BushHadPrior911Knowledge

HottestWebNews
Twitter http://twitter.com/following
Comcast.net: News, Sports, Video, TV listings, Email and more!http://www.comcast.net/d/
www.facebook.com
Facebook is a social utility that connects people with friends and others who work, study and live around them. People use Facebook to keep up with friends,
http://www.facebook.com/login.php
www.myspace.com/fringeshowshavetalent for entertaining fringe video clips
USA WEEKLY NEWS  EASY TO FIND HARD TO LEAVE 
Visit International News Limited for the best values on: 
domain names-domain transfers 
INLNews 
YahooMail  HotMail   GMail   AOLMail USA MAIL 

Click here to get you daily dose of  Real  Independent USA News with Amy Goodman at Domocracy Now
 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

GamingHarbor, Download Games to get 1000’s of Games!

http://www.gamingharbor.com/go.do?a=1805&l=4019

Welcome to Gaia | Gaia Onlinehttp://www.gaiaonline.com/

The Official Site of Major League Baseball: Events: 2009 All-Star Game Sprint Final Vote

http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/events/all_star/y2009/fv/ballot.html

Make Money At Home Onlinehttp://www.howimadecash.com/a/

Read Free Manga Online at One Manga. Online manga scans reader.http://www.onemanga.com/

www.world-job-news.com http://www.world-job-news.com/finance/?t202id=89559&t202kw=lppop-1

Mozilla Firefox Start Pagehttp://www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...


Inspirational Quote
"The beginning of love is to let those we love be perfectly themselves, and not to twist them to fit our own image. Otherwise we love only the reflection of ourselves we find in them.? Thomas Merton"

http://www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...

Your Daily Motivation from Inspiration Line Add Inspiring Daily Quotes to YOUR Website

Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
INLNews  YahooMail  HotMail  GMail  AOLMail USA MAILMyWayMail 
 CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNsNYTimes WashNs WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust 
WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs 
TasNews ABCTas DarwinNsUSA MAIL


ABC News Video  FOX News Video  FOXBusiness Video  CNN Video  AP Video  BBC News Video  Reuters Video  AFP Video  CNET Video
CNBC Video  Australia 7 News Video   Rocky Mountain News Elections Video  CBC.ca Video  NPR Audio  
Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone Video
Richard Bangs Adventures Video  Charlie Rose Video   Expanded Books Video  Assignment Earth Video 
ROOFTOPCOMEDY.com Video 
Guinness World Records Video  weather.com Video  AccuWeather Video  You Witness News User Video

NPR Audio BY CATEGORY Top Stories  Politics  World  Business  Sports 
 
Technology  Health & Science  Arts  U.S. 

VIEW LOCAL VIDEO KVUE-TV Austin  WJZ 13 Baltimore  WBZ Boston 
 
WCNC Charlotte  CBS 2 Chicago

CBS 11 Dallas  CBS4 Denver  13 News, WVEC Hampton Roads  11 News Houston  
CBS 2 / KCAL 9 Los Angeles

WHAS TV11 Louisville  CBS4 Miami  WCCO Minneapolis  WWL-TV, 
Channel 4 New Orleans
  CBS 2 New York

CBS 3 Philadelphia KTVK 3TV Phoenix  KDKA Pittsburgh  
KGW NewsChannel 8 Portland, Ore.  WRAL.com Raleigh

CBS 13 / CW 31 Sacramento  KENS 5 - TV San Antonio  Channel 8 San Diego 
 
CBS 5 San Francisco

KING5 Seattle  KREM.com Spokane/Coeur d'Alene  KMOV 
Channel 4 St. Louis
  FOX 11 Tucson

Video by Category
 
U.S. Business  World  Entertainment  Sports  Tech  Politics Science 
Health Environment Weather Opinion  Odd 

Video by Topic Campaign '08   Wall Street  Iraq  Gas Prices  Mideast Conflict 
 
Climate Change 

More INL News Video !Finance Sports


Hi there.welcome to
 YahooRealEstate.com.au  Yahoo!!!!!!!Click here for the cheapest real estate advertising on the internet

STUNTMAN: Jon Templeton will act as Hugh Jackman's stunt double in the film Australia. Picture: MEGAN  RAYLE

Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
USAWeeklyNews.com
http://usaweeklynews.com/Home_Page.html
USADailyNews http://www.usatoday.com/ 
USNews.com
 http://www.usnews.com/ USWeekly.com http://www.usweekly.com/
USANews.net http://www.usanews.net/

More Great World News Links

AP WORLD
AP NATIONAL
AP WASHINGTON
AP BUSINESS
AP ENTERTAINMENT
AP ON THE HOUR
AP HEADLINES
AP BREAKING
AP REUT PHOTO WIRE
AP AUDIO 
ABCNEWS 
ABCNEWS THE NOTE
AD AGE DEADLINE
BBC
BBC AUDIO
C-SPAN 
CHICAGO TRIB
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE
CNN
CNN POLITICAL TICKER
DAILY SWARM
DAILY VARIETY
ECONOMIST
EDITOR & PUBLISHER
BILLBOARD 
BOSTON GLOBE
BOSTON HERALD 
BREITBART
CBS NEWS 
EMIRATES TODAY
FINANCIAL TIMES 
FORBES
FOX NEWS
FREE REPUBLIC
HOT AIR
HILL
HUMAN EVENTS
IAFRICA
INTERNATIONAL HERALD
INVEST BUS DAILY
JERUSALEM POST
JEWISH WORLD REVIEW
LA DAILY NEWS
LA TIMES 
MEDIA WEEK 
MSNBC
MSNBC FIRST READ 
NATIONAL REVIEW
NEW REPUBLIC
NEW YORK
NY DAILY NEWS
NY OBSERVER
NY POST
NY SUN 
NY TIMES
NEW YORKER
NEWSBUSTERS
NEWSBYTES 
NEWSMAX
NEWSWEEK
N. KOREAN NEWS
PHILLY INQUIRER
PHILLY DAILY NEWS 
POLITICO
R & R
RADAR 
REAL CLEAR POLITICS
REASON MAG
ROLL CALL
SAN FRAN CHRON 
SKY NEWS
SLATE
SMOKING GUN
SPLASH NEWS
SYDNEY HERALD
U.K. DAILY MAIL 
U.K.DAILY MIRROR
DAILY RECORD
UNDER THE RADAR
U.K.EVENING STANDARD
U.K.EXPRESS
U.K.GUARDIAN
U.K.INDEPENDENT 
U.K.LONDON PAPER 
U.K.NEWS OF THE WORLD
U.K.SUN
U.K.TELEGRAPH
U.K.TIMES
US NEWS
USA TODAY
VILLAGE VOICE
WASH POST
WASH TIMES
WEEKLY STANDARD
WORLDNETDAILY


 

World Liberal News Links
MARC AMBINDER
JONATHAN ALTER

PAUL BEDARD
GLORIA BORGER

DAVID BRODER

DAVID BROOKS
ELEANOR CLIFT
MARIE COCCO
RICHARD COHEN
JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
DE BORCHGRAVE
MAUREEN DOWD
KEVIN DRUM
SUSAN ESTRICH
HOWARD FINEMAN
GEORGIE GEYER
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARK HALPERIN
PAUL KRUGMAN 
BILL PRESS
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
AL KAMEN



Conservative News
BRENT BOZELL III 
PAT BUCHANAN
HOWIE CARR 
MONA CHAREN
LINDA CHAVEZ
ANN COULTER
LOU DOBBS
LARRY ELDER 
JOSEPH FARAH 
SUZANNE FIELDS 
JOHN FUND 
MAGGIE GALLAGHER
BILL GERTZ
JONAH GOLDBERG 
SEAN HANNITY 
HUGH HEWITT  
LARRY KUDLOW
DAVID LIMBAUGH 
RUSH LIMBAUGH 
HAL LINDSEY
RICH LOWRY
MICHELLE MALKIN
JOHN McCASLIN
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER

BOB NOVAK
MARVIN OLASKY
GREG PIERCE
JIM PINDERTON 
WESLEY PRUDEN 
BILL O'REILLY
ROBERTS/ARGETSINGER
DICK MORRIS
MICHAEL SNEED 
JOE SOBRAN 
THOMAS SOWELL
MARK STEYN 
CAL THOMAS 
GEORGE WILL
WALTER WILLIAMS
PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY

 

  NEWS   NBA   NHL  Tennis   Golf   NFL   Soccer  NASCAR WORLD   LOCAL FINANCE    

More  Popular   Buzz  News 

Web Directory Listings of the top sites in each category.


 

 

 

 

 

  

Blog Web Discovery Machine

















































BushHadPrior911Knowledge
HottestWebNews
Twitter http://twitter.com/following
Comcast.net: News, Sports, Video, TV listings, Email and more!http://www.comcast.net/d/
www.facebook.com
Facebook is a social utility that connects people with friends and others who work, study and live around them. People use Facebook to keep up with friends,
http://www.facebook.com/login.php
www.myspace.com/fringeshowshavetalent for entertaining fringe video clips
USA WEEKLY NEWS  EASY TO FIND HARD TO LEAVE 
Visit International News Limited for the best values on: 
domain names-domain transfers 
INLNews 
YahooMail  HotMail   GMail   AOLMail USA MAIL  

Click here to get you daily dose of  Real  Independent USA News with Amy Goodman at Domocracy Now
 

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/

GamingHarbor, Download Games to get 1000’s of Games!
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/events/all_star/y2009/fv/ballot.html
Make Money At Home Onlinehttp://www.howimadecash.com/a/
Mozilla Firefox Start Pagehttp://www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...

Inspirational Quote
 "The beginning of love is to let those we love be perfectly themselves, and not to twist them to fit our own image. Otherwise we love only the reflection of ourselves we find in them.? Thomas Merton"
http://www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...
Your Daily Motivation from Inspiration Line Add Inspiring Daily Quotes to YOUR Website

Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
INLNews  YahooMail  HotMail  GMail  AOLMail USA MAILMyWayMail 
 CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNsNYTimes WashNs WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust 
WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs 
TasNews ABCTas DarwinNsUSA MAIL


ABC News Video  FOX News Video  FOXBusiness Video  CNN Video  AP Video  BBC News Video  Reuters Video  AFP Video  CNET Video
CNBC Video  Australia 7 News Video   Rocky Mountain News Elections Video  CBC.ca Video  NPR Audio  
Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone Video
Richard Bangs Adventures Video  Charlie Rose Video   Expanded Books Video  Assignment Earth Video 
ROOFTOPCOMEDY.com Video 
Guinness World Records Video  weather.com Video  AccuWeather Video  You Witness News User Video

NPR Audio BY CATEGORY Top Stories  Politics  World  Business  Sports 
 
Technology  Health & Science  Arts  U.S. 

VIEW LOCAL VIDEO KVUE-TV Austin  WJZ 13 Baltimore  WBZ Boston 
 
WCNC Charlotte  CBS 2 Chicago

Video by Category
 
U.S. Business  World  Entertainment  Sports  Tech  Politics Science 
Health Environment Weather Opinion  Odd 

Video by Topic Campaign '08   Wall Street  Iraq  Gas Prices  Mideast Conflict 
 
Climate Change 

More INL News Video !Finance Sports


Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
USAWeeklyNews.com
http://usaweeklynews.com/Home_Page.html
USADailyNews http://www.usatoday.com/ 
USNews.com
 http://www.usnews.com/ USWeekly.com http://www.usweekly.com/
USANews.net http://www.usanews.net/

More Great World News Links
AP WORLD
AP NATIONAL
AP WASHINGTON
AP BUSINESS
AP ENTERTAINMENT
AP ON THE HOUR
AP HEADLINES
AP BREAKING
AP REUT PHOTO WIRE
AP AUDIO 
ABCNEWS 
ABCNEWS THE NOTE
AD AGE DEADLINE
BBC
BBC AUDIO
C-SPAN 
CHICAGO TRIB
CHICAGO SUN-TIMES
CHRISTIAN SCIENCE
CNN
CNN POLITICAL TICKER
DAILY SWARM
DAILY VARIETY
ECONOMIST
EDITOR & PUBLISHER
BILLBOARD 
BOSTON GLOBE
BOSTON HERALD 
BREITBART
CBS NEWS 
EMIRATES TODAY
FINANCIAL TIMES 
FORBES
FOX NEWS
FREE REPUBLIC
HOT AIR
HILL
HUMAN EVENTS
IAFRICA
INTERNATIONAL HERALD
INVEST BUS DAILY
JERUSALEM POST
JEWISH WORLD REVIEW
LA DAILY NEWS
LA TIMES 
MEDIA WEEK 
MSNBC
MSNBC FIRST READ 
NATIONAL REVIEW
NEW REPUBLIC
NEW YORK
NY DAILY NEWS
NY OBSERVER
NY POST
NY SUN 
NY TIMES
NEW YORKER
NEWSBUSTERS
NEWSBYTES 
NEWSMAX
NEWSWEEK
N. KOREAN NEWS
PHILLY INQUIRER
PHILLY DAILY NEWS 
POLITICO
R & R
RADAR 
REAL CLEAR POLITICS
REASON MAG
ROLL CALL
SAN FRAN CHRON 
SKY NEWS
SLATE
SMOKING GUN
SPLASH NEWS
SYDNEY HERALD
U.K. DAILY MAIL 
U.K.DAILY MIRROR
DAILY RECORD
UNDER THE RADAR
U.K.EVENING STANDARD
U.K.EXPRESS
U.K.GUARDIAN
U.K.INDEPENDENT 
U.K.LONDON PAPER 
U.K.NEWS OF THE WORLD
U.K.SUN
U.K.TELEGRAPH
U.K.TIMES
US NEWS
USA TODAY
VILLAGE VOICE
WASH POST
WASH TIMES
WEEKLY STANDARD
WORLDNETDAILY


 

World Liberal News Links
MARC AMBINDER
JONATHAN ALTER

PAUL BEDARD
GLORIA BORGER

DAVID BRODER

DAVID BROOKS
ELEANOR CLIFT
MARIE COCCO
RICHARD COHEN
JOE CONASON
DAVID CORN
CRAIG CRAWFORD
STANLEY CROUCH
DE BORCHGRAVE
MAUREEN DOWD
KEVIN DRUM
SUSAN ESTRICH
HOWARD FINEMAN
GEORGIE GEYER
ELLEN GOODMAN
MARK HALPERIN
PAUL KRUGMAN 
BILL PRESS
CARL HIAASEN
NAT HENTOFF
PEREZ HILTON
CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS
AL KAMEN



Conservative News
BRENT BOZELL III 
PAT BUCHANAN
HOWIE CARR 
MONA CHAREN
LINDA CHAVEZ
ANN COULTER
LOU DOBBS
LARRY ELDER 
JOSEPH FARAH 
SUZANNE FIELDS 
JOHN FUND 
MAGGIE GALLAGHER
BILL GERTZ
JONAH GOLDBERG 
SEAN HANNITY 
HUGH HEWITT  
LARRY KUDLOW
DAVID LIMBAUGH 
RUSH LIMBAUGH 
HAL LINDSEY
RICH LOWRY
MICHELLE MALKIN
JOHN McCASLIN
CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER

BOB NOVAK
MARVIN OLASKY
GREG PIERCE
JIM PINDERTON 
WESLEY PRUDEN 
BILL O'REILLY
ROBERTS/ARGETSINGER
DICK MORRIS
MICHAEL SNEED 
JOE SOBRAN 
THOMAS SOWELL
MARK STEYN 
CAL THOMAS 
GEORGE WILL
WALTER WILLIAMS
PHYLLIS SCHLAFLY
 
  NEWS   NBA   NHL  Tennis   Golf   NFL   Soccer  NASCAR WORLD   LOCAL FINANCE    
More  Popular   Buzz  News 

Web Directory Listings of the top sites in each category.


 
 
 
 
 
  

Blog Web Discovery Machine

  • In Time for Summer, Top Travel Sites
    Jun 30, 2009 Posted by Geoffrey Mack
  • Facebook Juggernaut Overtakes YouTube
    Jun 10, 2009 Posted by Geoffrey Mack
  • Don't forget the Grads... Top Used Car Sites

    MORE NEWS LINKS

    • GLOBE-INTEL
      ***NEWS*****ANALYSIS**** COMMENTARY
      EDITORS: GORDON THOMAS ***MARTIN DILLON***KEVIN DOWLING
      ------------------------------ ------------------------------ --------------------
      NUMBER :- 104 DATE :- 21/05/02
      BUSH: THE IGNORED WARNING THAT WILL COME TO HAUNT HIM
      By Gordon Thomas.
      Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon authorised the leak of sensitive documents which reveal America's spy agencies were warned about a terrorist strike weeks before September 11. The controversial move has now directly embroiled President George Bush in the 'how-much-did-he-know?' debate over the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
      Sharon's reaction is a calculated response to growing claims that Mossad has been running spy operations within the United States and also reveals a split in the special relationship between the two leaders.
      Mossad chiefs insist the Israeli spy agency was tracking Osama Bin-Laden's terrorists in America before September 11 and that that the information was passed on to the CIA on Five separate occasions before the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon. As late asAugust 24, less than two weeks before the attacks, a Mossad warning, confirmed by German intelligence, BND, said that "terrorists plan to hijack commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of American and Israeli culture." The warning alert was passed to the CIA. 

      • The warning was also passed to MI6. The agency made its own checks and also informed the CIAFrustrated by its inability to alert the CIA to an impending attack, Mossad arranged on September 1, according to Tel Aviv sources last week, for Russian intelligence to warn Washington "in the strongest possible terms of imminent assaults on airports and government buildings." Mossad's fury at the failure of the US intelligence community to act has been compounded by the revelation that the Bush administration had ordered the FBI Only a Week Before the September attacks to curtail investigations on two of Osama Bin-Laden's close relatives living in the US


      state of Virginia at the time.

      • Sharon's decision to allow the story of Bush's prior knowledge of the attack to be leaked comes at a time when Israel is smarting over what Sharon sees as Bush pressurising the Jewish state into an accommodation with Arafat.


      • The feeling in Tel Aviv is that Bush's much hyped war on terrorism does not actually fit into the aggressive policy Israel wants to pursue.


      • Sharon has already suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of his archrival, former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as the central committee of their Likud Party ruled out the establishment of a Palestinian state last Sunday.


      • The party's decision, formalized in a resolution backed by Netanyahu, directly contradicted Sharon's own stated acceptance of a Palestinian state as the eventual conclusion of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. It came as Sharon faces mounting domestic and international pressure to find a way to stop more than 19 months of bloodshed and launch talks with the Palestinians. 

        • The support he was expecting from America failed to materialise, said a source close to Mossad. "Ariel Sharon is furious because he thinks Bush has not supported him as fully as he could. His coalition is falling apart, Netanyahu has sneaked ahead of him and the Israelis are generally fed up of living in fear. Sharon is quite clear where the blame lies - in the White House. "Now he has really stirred things up byputting Bush right at the centre of this storm by actively allowing these sensitive documents to be leaked to the world. He feels he needs to teach Bush a lesson and this will certainly complicate America's peace efforts in the region," he said. 

          • According to similar documents shown to the Sunday Express, Mossad was running a round-the-clock surveillance operation on some of the September 11 hijackers.  

        • The details, contained in classified papers, reveal that a senior Mossad agent tipped off his counterpart in America's Central Intelligence Agency that a massive terrorist hit was being planned in the US. A handful of the spies had infiltrated the Al-Qaeda organisation while a staggering 120 others, posing as overseas art students, launched massive undercover operations throughout America.  

        • Other documents leaked to the Sunday Express from several intelligence agencies including the Drugs Enforcement Agency show that two Mossad cells of six Egyptian and Yemeni born Jews, trained at a secret base in Israel's Negev Desert on how to penetrate Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda network.


        • One team flew to Amsterdam and were under the control of Mossad's Europe Station. This is based at Schipol Airport within the El Al complex.They later made contact in Hamburg with Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker on September 11.


      • The second group flew directly to New York. From there they travelled South to Florida and infiltrated the Bin laden organisation.


      • In August last year, the Mossad team in Europe flew with some of the Hamburg terrorists into Boston, a month before the attack on the twin towers.


      • By then the Mossad team had established an attack on the US was "imminent". It reported this to its Tel Aviv controller through the Israeli Embassy in Washington using a system of secure communications. In early September Mossad Chief Efraim Halevy sent a warning to the CIA of the possibility of such an attack. The warning was noted and acknowledged. But CIA chief George Tenet is understood to have described it as "too non-specific." The FBI was also informed.


      • Halevy sent a second alert to the CIA that reached Washington on or around September 7.


      • A spokesman for the FBI refused to discuss specific details of the Mossad operation but said: "There are Congressional hearings with regard to possible intelligence failures arising from September 11. We can't verify your information because it is part of an ongoing investigation."


      • Neither the DEA or the CIA would comment on the record, but a senior US intelligence source said: "Anyone can be wise after the event but it was extremely difficult to act on a non specific threat given in a couple of tips from Israeli intelligence. It would be interesting to know if they could have been more specific with their information.


      • ''Their surveillance teams must have observed Atta and his accomplices going to flying schools. I guess we might never know the real truth." 


      • The spying operations first came to the attention of the DEA in January 2001 according to a classified 90-page dossier which has been seen by the Sunday Express. The names, passport details and other personal records of some of the Israeli-born spies are also detailed in the dossier. 

      (ends)
      he sure does cover for Mossad.....
      they were trying to help us right? by organizing a film crew to watch the towers collapse and cheering?.
      The above article is a dynamite example of how foreign intelligence agencies insert moles into US Government power seats and use them to carry out operations.

      • This guy really blows. Here he "covers" for the Mossad for spying on us. Oh right, that was a GOOD thing. Too bad WE didn't listen to them....
        http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/ gordonthomas.htm
        The report below was published 21 May 2002 by the GLOBE-INTEL web site run by Gordon Thomas.
        http://www.canadafreepress. com/writers/gordon-thomas.htm
        Thomas is a recognised authority on the Israeli intelligence service Mossad, to which he is considered to have had exceptional journalistic access over the years. Thomas is the author of the book 'Gideon's Spies - The Secret History of the Mossad', which susequently became a major documentary for the UK's Channel 4 TV station. Thomas writes on intelligence subjects for the Sunday Express.
        The URL of the 21 May 2002 report below by GLOBE-INTEL was http://www.gordonthomas. ie/104.html at the time of publication. The report is, however, no longer available at that address on the GLOBE-INTEL site. A mhtl copy dowloaded from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (archive date Jun 15, 2007) is available here.
        The Israeli spy-ring within the United States referred to by Thomas has been separately reported on by Fox News and the intelligence journal Jane's Security News (further references are available from the Antiwar.com web site and History Commons, 'The Complete 9/11 Timeline').- The Daily Telegraph has separately reported that Israeli intelligence had visited the CIA in August 2001 to warn of imminent terrorist attacks on America. An extract of this report is provided at the bottom of this page. A full copy of the GLOBE-INTEL report is also provided below -More information about the warnings the CIA received from the Israelis and Russians is available here.
        http://www.btinternet.com/~ nlpwessex/Documents/ WATTenetsilence.htm

    nternational Intelligence
    On Saturday night's program, Gordon Thomas, author of Secret Wars and Gideon's Spies, joined Ian for a discussion on international intelligence matters.

    Thomas shared breaking news from Britain's MI5 and MI6 intelligence agencies about the possibility of attacks by terrorists during the upcoming G20 summit. Thomas said the threats against the UK are at the "top end of severe," which means an "attack is coming." According to Thomas, Britain is home to the largest number of homegrown jihadists in the world, trained and ready to launch Mumbai-style attacks when the G20 nations meet on April 2 in London. Preventing the attack may prove difficult, Thomas explained, as MI5 officials have been bogged down by spies from France and Germany sent into the country to bribe key workers in sensitive jobs who are having financial troubles.

    Thomas reported on a ruthless group of government assassins known as Company 14, who he said are hunting down members of the IRA responsible for killing two British soldiers and a policeman in Northern Ireland. He also commented on the death of Dr. David Kelly. The position of his body, suspicious phone calls, and other puzzling details surrounding his apparent suicide suggest the weapons expert may have been murdered for his assessment of Iraq's WMD program, Thomas noted.
    hat got me about this show was that he covered the relationships of MI5 - CIA and the MOSSAD and made it sound like a very cozy relationship. No reference to the Israeli spy ring in the U.S. following the "hijackers" and the DEA. or Amdoc's and NICE Systems.

    Nor did he cover the spying and continuing attempts of the U.K. for over 100 years to control and subjugate the U.S.A.

    Evidence points to breakdown in US / UK Relations 

    Related Link on the history of the "Special Relationship"

    Webster G. Tarpley Debunks Pearl Harbor Myths (Amongst Other Things) 

    Something interesting : British Security Coordination (Propaganda) Spy Ring in the U.S. prior to Pearl Harbor

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/ 2006/aug/19/military. secondworldwar

    It was 1940, the Nazis were in the ascendant, the Blitz at its deadliest, and Britain's last hope was to bring a reluctant United States into the war. So it was that the largest covert operation in UK history was launched. William Boyd sheds light on a forgotten spy ring.

    William Boyd
    The Guardian, Saturday 19 August 2006

    "British Security Coordination". The phrase is bland, almost defiantly ordinary, depicting perhaps some sub-committee of a minor department in a lowly Whitehall ministry. In fact BSC, as it was generally known, represented one of the largest covert operations in British spying history; a covert operation, moreover, that was run not in Occupied France, nor in the Soviet Union during the cold war, but in the US, our putative ally, during 1940 and 1941, before Pearl Harbor and the US's eventual participation in the war in Europe against Nazi Germany.
    ...
    One easily forgets this, in the era of our much-vaunted, so-called "special relationship", but at the nadir of Britain's fortunes, polls in the US still showed that 80% of Americans were against joining the war in Europe. Anglophobia was widespread and the US Congress was violently opposed to any form of intervention.
    .... read the rest..
    http://www.larouchepub.com/ other/2005/3232aipac_indict. html

    This article appears in the August 12, 2005 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.

    Larry Franklin Case:
    AIPAC Leaders Snared 

    by Jeffrey Steinberg

    On Aug. 4, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Paul McNulty, announced the indictment of two former top officials of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), on charges of "conspiracy to communicate national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it." The same indictment included new espionage charges against Pentagon desk officer and Air Force Reserve Colonel Lawrence Franklin, who has already been indicted in the Eastern District, as well as in West Virginia.

    The two "ex"-AIPAC officials are Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman. Since 1982, Rosen has been AIPAC's Director of Foreign Policy Issues. Since 1993, Weissman has been Senior Middle East Analyst at AIPAC.

    Before coming to work for AIPAC, Rosen had been employed from 1978-82 at the RAND Corporation. During that period, he worked on contract projects for the Central Intelligence Agency, and had top-level security clearances. Thus, Rosen signed written secrecy agreements with the U.S. government that remained binding after he went to work for AIPAC.

    Far-Flung Espionage Network
    The new indictments, which have been anticipated for several months, unveil an Israeli espionage network that has been functioning since at least April 1999, involving a number of Pentagon officials beyond Franklin, as well as at least three officials of the Israeli Embassy and a former senior Mossad officer, Uzi Arad, who now heads Israel's premier national security think-tank, the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center.[/color]
    U.S. intelligence officials have told EIR that the AIPAC/Franklin case reveals a new modus operandi, adopted by Israel intelligence, in the aftermath of the disastrous Jonathan Pollard spy scandal of the mid-1980s. Pollard, a Naval intelligence analyst, was caught pilfering thousands of classified Pentagon and CIA documents and passing them on to an Israeli intelligence unit headed by former Mossad European operations director Rafi Eytan, a close ally of current Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.
    As the result of the blowback from the Pollard affair, according to the U.S. intelligence sources, Israel shifted its espionage operations targetted at the United States to think-tanks and lobbying organizations like AIPAC, which have ongoing "legitimate" contacts with American government officials.
    What the Israelis and the AIPAC spooks did not anticipate was that their operations would be closely scrutinized by the FBI and other U.S. agencies, for at least the past six years, revealing numerous instances where the "legitimate" contacts crossed over into hard espionage.
    The 26-page indictment is, in fact, a catalogue of scores of instances of classified information being passed from Pentagon officials to the two AIPAC men, on to Israeli Embassy personnel.
    Franklin apparently walked into an ongoing FBI counterintelligence surveillance of Rosen and Weissman, when he held his first meeting with the two men on Feb. 12, 2003. According to the indictment, phone conversations that Rosen had en route to the first meeting with Franklin, were monitored by the FBI. From Feb. 12, 2003 until July 9, 2004, Franklin had dozens of phone discussions and meetings with the two AIPAC officials, and on at least one occasion, faxed a document from his Pentagon office to Rosen's home.
    In June 2004, FBI agents confronted Franklin with evidence of his espionage activities, and Franklin agreed to cooperate with the government. His subsequent meetings with the two AIPAC officials were all controlled by the FBI, until Aug. 3, when the FBI visited both Rosen and Weissman. According to the indictment, even after the FBI visits, Rosen and Weissman continued to pass classified data provided by Franklin to select U.S. journalists and even to Israeli embassy officials.
    Franklin's Network
    Lawrence Franklin had his own problems with his dealings with Israeli intelligence officials, even before his assignment to the Pentagon in early 2001 as Iran desk officer at the Near East South Asia policy office, under Assistant Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith and Deputy Assistant Secretary William Luti, a transplant from the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney.
    Back in the late 1990s, as an Air Force Reserve officer, Franklin had done two tours of duty at the U.S. Embassy in Israel, in the Air Attaché's Office. On his second tour, Franklin was kicked out of the country by the Air Attaché after a few months, after repeated incidents in which he held unauthorized meetings with Israeli intelligence officials.
    It may have been these Israeli connections that landed Franklin his job at NESA—or perhaps his ties to then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who was Dean of Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, D.C. when Franklin was a graduate student there.
    Whatever his pathway to the Pentagon, Franklin, according to eyewitness sources, became a fixture at regular "brown bag lunches" at the private office of Doug Feith attended by leading Pentagon neo-cons, including Harold Rhode, Luti, Abraham Shulsky, Richard Perle, and occasionally Wolfowitz. Franklin's NESA boss, Luti, boasted frequently that he was working for "Scooter," a reference to Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff, Lewis Libby. (Libby, when he was not working for the government, was the personal attorney for Mossad frontman and international swindler Marc Rich. Well-informed U.S. intelligence officials believe that Rich, a Zug, Switzerland-based metal trader, was set up in business with Mossad funds.)
    Franklin was also a traveling companion of Iran-Contra figure and self-professed "universal fascist" Michael Ledeen, in December 2001. Ledeen, Franklin, and Harold Rhode travelled to Rome for secret meetings with Iranian con-artist Manucher Ghorbanifar, another prominent Iran-Contra scandal figure who brokered Israeli missile sales to Iran in exchange for efforts to free American hostages in Lebanon.The scheme led to criminal indictments against a number of Reagan-Bush Administration officials and CIA officers, including Elliott Abrams and Duane Claridge.
    The latest Franklin indictment threatens to snare some of these other leading neo-cons. The court papers filed in the Eastern District of Virginia identify several other Pentagon officials, along with at least three Israeli Embassy officials and Uzi Arad, as players in the extended Franklin spy operation.
    The indictment of "Mr. AIPAC," Steven Rosen, also raises serious questions about the future of "America's Pro-Israel Lobby," as AIPAC's website describes the group. According to sources close to the Franklin probe, AIPAC may be forced, as a result of the Franklin case, to register as a foreign agent organization, thus losing its tax-exempt status and forcing much closer accounting of its finances and activities.
    The Franklin case has not even come close to fully unraveling. And many leading Pentagon neo-cons are losing sleep over where this case will go next.
    What makes matters even worse, the same basic cast of characters is tied up in the Valerie Plame Wilson leak probe, headed by independent counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, and a separate probe, headed by U.S. Attorney McNulty, into who was behind the forging of Niger government documents which purported to show that Iraq sought to buy "yellowcake" uranium from the African state to build nuclear weapons. The forged documents were used by Vice President Cheney and other Administration war hawks to win Congressional and public support for the invasion of Iraq. Plame's husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, was dispatched to Niger in 2002 to assess the validity of the Niger yellowcake charge, and returned to report that it was a hoax. His report was covered up, and the train of events was set into motion which led to his wife's "outing" as a covert CIA operative, by top Administration officials—a criminal offense.

    There are allegations that the Ledeen-Rhode-Franklin trip to Rome in 2001 may have played a role in the circulation of the forged documents
    http://www.larouchepac.com/ node/9423
    Netanyahu Slaps U.S. in the Face with Spymaster Uzi Arad
    March 6, 2009 (LPAC)--Israel's Prime Minister-designate Bibi Netanyahu brought the notorious spymaster Uzi Arad into the meetings with Hillary Clinton and George Mitchell, this week, reports the Israeli newspaper, Ha'aretz. Uzi Arad, is persona non grata in the United States because of his involvement with Pentagon spy, Larry Franklin, an analyst with the Office of Special Plans (OSP), the Dick Cheney-neo-conservative unit in the Pentagon that manufactured false intelligence to justify the Iraq war. Franklin was convicted in January, 2006, in a plea bargain, of stealing classified documents on Iran and other subjects from the Pentagon, and passing them on to Israeli government officials, in meetings arranged by the two top officials of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman). Arad, who is unable to come to the U.S. because of his involvement with Franklin, is reportedly going to be head of the Israeli National Security Council, Ha'aretz wrote.
    Not only did Bibi include Arad in his first meeting with the top U.S. officials, but he kicked the Israeli Ambassador to the U.S., Sallai Meridor out the meeting. Ha'aretz reported that this insult from Netanyahu was the reason that Meridor resigned today.
    Lyndon LaRouche said today that what Netanyahoo did was "a slap in the face to the U.S. And that if Netanyahoo breaks from the U.S., that represents Netanyahoo's plans for leaving earth."
    So, does the Pentagon really have a great relationship with Mossad? i dont think so.
    And who is really behind Netanyahu? a group of fascists in London that put Dick Cheney into office.
    "Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate … It will purge the rottenness out of the system..." - Andrew Mellon, Secretary of Treasury, 1929.
    One thing the Brit's love is to have THEIR historians write THEIR history. And I think we can label Gordon Thomas one of THEIR's and a propagandist TOOL.

    http://intelligencenews. wordpress.com/2009/03/21/01- 107/

    The other two are an authorized history (from 1909 to 1949) of MI6 by Professor Keith Jeffery, of Queen’s University, Belfast, andGordon Thomas’ Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence, which intelNews has received and will be reviewing shortly. .
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Gordon_Thomas
    Thomas was born in Wales, in a cemetery keeper’s cottage where his grandmother lived. He had his first story published at nine years old in a Boys Own Paper competition. With his father in the RAF, he travelled widely and was educated at the Cairo High School, the Maritz Brothers in Port Elizabeth and, finally, at Bedford Modern.
    His first book, completed at the age of seventeen, is the story of a British spy in Russia during World War Two, titled Descent Into Danger.He turned down the offer of a place at university in order to accompany a travelling fair for a year: those experiences became Bed of Nails. Since then his books have been published worldwide. He has been a foreign correspondent beginning with the Suez Crisis and ending with the first Gulf War. He was a BBC writer/producer for three flagship BBC programmes: Man Alive, Tomorrows World and Horizon. He is a regular contributor to Facta, the respected monthly Japanese news magazine, and helectures widely on the secret world of intelligence. He also provides expert analysis on intelligence for US and European television and radio shows.[1]
    His Gideon’s Spies: Mossad’s Secret Warriors became a major documentary for Channel Four that he wrote and narrated: The Spy Machine. It followed three years of research during which he was given unprecedented access to Mossad’s key personnel. The documentary was co-produced by Open Media and Israfilm[2].
    Gideon’s Spies: Mossad’s Secret Warriors has so far been published in 16 languages. The main source for this book is Ari Ben-Menashe, a self-described former Mossad agent. According to Charles Foster in Contemporary Review: "Writers who know their place are few and far between: fortunately Mr Thomas is one of them. By keeping to his place as a tremendous storyteller without a preacher's pretensions, he has put his book amongst the important chronicles of the state of Israel." [2]
    Well, what he appears to be doing is scapegoating Mossad when everyone knows London built the Nation of Israel, hence their intelligence agencies are linked.
    So he highlights what Mossad really did, but neglects to highlight the relationship of the Crown, MI6 and Mossad, and their potential Moles in the United States.
    No one mentions Sykes - Picot EITHER, which is the main force behind the destabalization of the middle east right now and was the primary reason for World War I;
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_ depth/middle_east/2001/israel_ and_the_palestinians/key_ documents/1681362.stm
    undefined

    The Sykes-Picot agreement is a secret understanding concluded in May 1916, during World War I, between Great Britain and France, with the assent of Russia, for the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire.
    The agreement led to the division of Turkish-held Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine into various French and British-administered areas. The agreement took its name from its negotiators, Sir Mark Sykes of Britain and Georges Picot of France.
    Some historians have pointed out that the agreement conflicted with pledges already given by the British to the Hashimite leader Husayn ibn Ali, Sharif of Mecca, who was about to lead an Arab revolt in the Hejaz against the Ottoman rulers on the understanding that the Arabs would eventually receive a much more important share of the territory won. 

    US history is an interesting thing, and no one really highlights the REASON many intelligent souls traveled to the U.S.
    The Reason was, Europe was infested with feudalist corruption and the idea was, the United States would be built up as a nation to keep Europe from destroying itself. Read about Benjamin Franklin, these people wanted to create a Nation free of Oligarchs and the European monetary system (Which in reality is dependence on Royal Gold Supplies for economic expansion). The European monetary system was controlled by the various royalties until the 1600's when the British Empire began to dominate more and more of Eurasia.
    With the British ability to contract and limit Gold supplies, they had the ability to limit world wide growth hence, the ability to CONTROL the WORLD, by preventing any (NAVAL) force to grow stronger then theirs. Remember, in the 1700's there were no railways, NAVAL power was supreme...... So we can fastfoward to the mid 1800's when Lincoln took office, revived the Greenback and built the intercontintental railway......... what did this accomplish? it DESTROYED British control over US Trade routes by nullfying their NAVAL POWER. This lead to the industrialization of the United States into a power that even the British Empire could not tackle via conventional warfare.
    The Continental Congress issued fiat currency for that exact reason as well, because the European Royalty could strangle the Nation of Currency if we were to use Gold as a currency.
    This is what got my ear's up and my suspicion that there is something going on in the U.K. and the G20 coming up , plus the recent "IRA?" attack....
    Ian p. asked no hard questions that I could discern and the callers were almost praising MI5 and the UK as being our beast friends... 
    With this guy some of his lies are true.


    http://snardfarker.ning.com/ profiles/blog/show?id=2649739% 3ABlogPost%3A37858&page=2# comment-2649739_Comment_37912
    GREAT BRITAIN ON HIGHEST TERRORIST ALERT POSSIBLE!!!!
    3-22-09 Critical Red Alert in Great Britain
    Talk show Host Ian Punnett of Coast to Coast announced that sources have revealed that Britain is on highest-ever terror alert! This information was confirmed by Gordon Thomas who checked with his sources in the British Intelligence who spoke of information of a mumbi attacks.He was on the air speaking with Author Gordon Thomas who was discussing the history of the British Intelligence Services when this information came in as who has ties to British MI5 agents.
    Gordon Thomas wrote the book: Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence inside MI5 and MI6 (US Edition) Inside British Intelligence: 100 Years of MI5 and MI6 (UK Edition) These agencies rank as two of the oldest and most powerful in the world, and Thomas’s recounts the roles that British intelligence played with insider information more startling than anything out of James Bond.
    Gordon Thomas also wrote the book: Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of The Mossad
    which was republished to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. Updating the data on events leading to the 9/11 Attacks and the aftermath.
    In this book Gordon Thomas claims that; Bibi, Netanyahu's first wife, actually spied on Bill Clinton, and that Mossad had wire tapped the White House. Also that Princess Diana's driver Henry Paul was a Mossad agent.
    More information to come with updates....

    http://www.gordonthomas- author.com/
    This guy really blows. Here he "covers" for the Mossad for spying on us. Oh right, that was a GOOD thing. Too bad WE didn't listen to them....
    http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/ gordonthomas.htm
    The report below was published 21 May 2002 by the GLOBE-INTEL web site run by Gordon Thomas.
    http://www.canadafreepress. com/writers/gordon-thomas.htm
    Thomas is a recognised authority on the Israeli intelligence service Mossad, to which he is considered to have had exceptional journalistic access over the years. Thomas is the author of the book 'Gideon's Spies - The Secret History of the Mossad', which susequently became a major documentary for the UK's Channel 4 TV station. Thomas writes on intelligence subjects for the Sunday Express.
    The URL of the 21 May 2002 report below by GLOBE-INTEL was http://www.gordonthomas. ie/104.html at the time of publication. The report is, however, no longer available at that address on the GLOBE-INTEL site. A mhtl copy dowloaded from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (archive date Jun 15, 2007) is available here.
    The Israeli spy-ring within the United States referred to by Thomas has been separately reported on by Fox News and the intelligence journal Jane's Security News (further references are available from the Antiwar.com web site and History Commons, 'The Complete 9/11 Timeline').- The Daily Telegraph has separately reported that Israeli intelligence had visited the CIA in August 2001 to warn of imminent terrorist attacks on America. An extract of this report is provided at the bottom of this page. A full copy of the GLOBE-INTEL report is also provided below -More information about the warnings the CIA received from the Israelis and Russians is available here.
    http://www.btinternet.com/~ nlpwessex/Documents/ WATTenetsilence.htm

    GLOBE-INTEL
    ***NEWS*****ANALYSIS**** COMMENTARY
    EDITORS: GORDON THOMAS ***MARTIN DILLON***KEVIN DOWLING
    ------------------------------ ------------------------------ --------------------
    NUMBER :- 104 DATE :- 21/05/02
    BUSH: THE IGNORED WARNING THAT WILL COME TO HAUNT HIM

    By Gordon Thomas.

    Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon authorised the leak of sensitive documents which reveal America's spy agencies were warned about a terrorist strike weeks before September 11. The controversial move has now directly embroiled President George Bush in the 'how-much-did-he-know?' debate over the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

    Sharon's reaction is a calculated response to growing claims that Mossad has been running spy operations within the United States and also reveals a split in the special relationship between the two leaders.

    Mossad chiefs insist the Israeli spy agency was tracking Osama Bin-Laden's terrorists in America before September 11 and that that the information was passed on to the CIA on Five separate occasions before the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon. As late asAugust 24, less than two weeks before the attacks, a Mossad warning, confirmed by German intelligence, BND, said that "terrorists plan to hijack commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of American and Israeli culture." The warning alert was passed to the CIA. 

    The warning was also passed to MI6. The agency made its own checks and also informed the CIAFrustrated by its inability to alert the CIA to an impending attack, Mossad arranged on September 1, according to Tel Aviv sources last week, for Russian intelligence to warn Washington "in the strongest possible terms of imminent assaults on airports and government buildings."Mossad's fury at the failure of the US intelligence community to act has been compounded by the revelation that the Bush administration had ordered the FBI Only a Week Before the September attacks to curtail investigations on two of Osama Bin-Laden's close relatives living in the US
    state of Virginia at the time.

    Sharon's decision to allow the story of Bush's prior knowledge of the attack to be leaked comes at a time when Israel is smarting over what Sharon sees as Bush pressurising the Jewish state into an accommodation with Arafat.

    The feeling in Tel Aviv is that Bush's much hyped war on terrorism does not actually fit into the aggressive policy Israel wants to pursue.

    Sharon has already suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of his archrival, former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as the central committee of their Likud Party ruled out the establishment of a Palestinian state last Sunday.

    The party's decision, formalized in a resolution backed by Netanyahu, directly contradicted Sharon's own stated acceptance of a Palestinian state as the eventual conclusion of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. It came as Sharon faces mounting domestic and international pressure to find a way to stop more than 19 months of bloodshed and launch talks with the Palestinians.

    The support he was expecting from America failed to materialise, said a source close to Mossad. "Ariel Sharon is furious because he thinks Bush has not supported him as fully as he could. His coalition is falling apart, Netanyahu has sneaked ahead of him and the Israelis are generally fed up of living in fear. Sharon is quite clear where the blame lies - in the White House. "Now he has really stirred things up byputting Bush right at the centre of this storm by actively allowing these sensitive documents to be leaked to the world. He feels he needs to teach Bush a lesson and this will certainly complicate America's peace efforts in the region," he said.


    According to similar documents shown to the Sunday Express, Mossad was running a round-the-clock surveillance operation on some of the September 11 hijackers. 

    The details, contained in classified papers, reveal that a senior Mossad agent tipped off his counterpart in America's Central Intelligence Agency that a massive terrorist hit was being planned in the US. A handful of the spies had infiltrated the Al-Qaeda organisation while a staggering 120 others, posing as overseas art students, launched massive undercover operations throughout America. 

    Other documents leaked to the Sunday Express from several intelligence agencies including the Drugs Enforcement Agency show that two Mossad cells of six Egyptian and Yemeni born Jews, trained at a secret base in Israel's Negev Desert on how to penetrate Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda network.


    One team flew to Amsterdam and were under the control of Mossad's Europe Station. This is based at Schipol Airport within the El Al complex. They later made contact in Hamburg with Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker on September 11.

    The second group flew directly to New York. From there they travelled South to Florida and infiltrated the Bin laden organisation.

    In August last year, the Mossad team in Europe flew with some of the Hamburg terrorists into Boston, a month before the attack on the twin towers.

    By then the Mossad team had established an attack on the US was "imminent". It reported this to its Tel Aviv controller through the Israeli Embassy in Washington using a system of secure communications. In early September Mossad Chief Efraim Halevy sent a warning to the CIA of the possibility of such an attack. The warning was noted and acknowledged. But CIA chief George Tenet is understood to have described it as "too non-specific." The FBI was also informed.

    Halevy sent a second alert to the CIA that reached Washington on or around September 7.

    A spokesman for the FBI refused to discuss specific details of the Mossad operation but said: "There are Congressional hearings with regard to possible intelligence failures arising from September 11. We can't verify your information because it is part of an ongoing investigation."

    Neither the DEA or the CIA would comment on the record, but a senior US intelligence source said: "Anyone can be wise after the event but it was extremely difficult to act on a non specific threat given in a couple of tips from Israeli intelligence. It would be interesting to know if they could have been more specific with their information.

    ''Their surveillance teams must have observed Atta and his accomplices going to flying schools. I guess we might never know the real truth." 

    The spying operations first came to the attention of the DEA in January 2001 according to a classified 90-page dossier which has been seen by the Sunday Express. The names, passport details and other personal records of some of the Israeli-born spies are also detailed in the dossier.

    (ends)
    he sure does cover for Mossad.....

    they were trying to help us right? by organizing a film crew to watch the towers collapse and cheering?.

    The above article is a dynamite example of how foreign intelligence agencies insert moles into US Government power seats and use them to carry out operations.


    Rothchild involved with MI5 CIA and Mossad part 3
    ROTHSCHILD, Lord Nathanial Mayer Victor
    Name: ROTHSCHILD, Lord (Nathaniel Mayer Victor)
    NationalityBritishOccupation:BankerBorn:1910Died: 1990
    The startling accusations against Rothschild is that he is the 'Fifth Man', not John Cairncross. According to Roland Perry's book 'The Fifth Man' published in 1994. That he is the dominant member of the Cambridge Spy Ring, not Philby, Blunt, Burgess of Maclean. That he is possibly the most important Soviet Spy of all. Soviet intelligence officer, Yuri Modin added. 'Just as the Three Musketeers were four, so the Cambridge five were six.'

    Rothschild was the British head of the famous banking dynasty, which apart from prolific achievements in art, science, wine and charity. It had shaped recent history by such acts as the financing of the British army at the Battle of Waterloo and the purchasing of the Suez Canal for Great Britain and Prime Minister Disraeli. He was on intimate terms with many of the most senior members of the intelligence and security services Guy Liddell, Roger Hollis, Dick White, Stewart Menzies Maurice Oldfield, Robert Vansittart, the Permanent Under-secretary of State in the Foreign Office and many others.

    It's largely accepted among MI5 officers that during the 1945 to 1963 period, the Soviets were receiving vital information which enabled them to thwart British operations run against the Soviet Embassy and the Intelligence service. MI5 had apparently been penetrated by someone. The inference was always that it had to be an insider. However, one of the leading Soviet double agents working for SIS (MI6), Oleg Gordievsky, who defected to Britain in 1985, denied that the Soviets had anyone of importance on the inside of M15 in the contentious years from around 1950 to 1963.

    Rothschild had been in MI5 during World War Two and had been awarded a medal for outstanding bravery for disfusing a new type of German explosive munitions. The argument is that he was recruited for the Soviet cause in pre-war years by playing on his undoubted commitment to a future homeland for the Jews and his anti-Nazi beliefs. Later the fact that he had spied for the Soviets would have been used to blackmail him into continuing to do so, long after it became obvious that Jews were little better treated in the USSR as Nazi Germany. Fear of publicity was to be perhaps the driving force behind his supposed treachery and his later involvement in the Spycatcher affair.

    In 1958, Rothschild's fostering of Peter Wright turned quickly to patronage on the basis that they were scientists who understood each other. Wright could have been an easy prey for the sophisticated peer. Although talented, Wright was not Oxbridge educated and therefore an outsider in a service which was run by the old-school ties. For the first time in his professional life, Wright felt wanted, understood and appreciated. In this atmosphere, Wright may have spilled everything of importance in his section of MI5. Rothschild offered help. He was in the oil group Shell overseeing scientific development. He seconded staff to MI5. Wright told him about every piece of espionage technology under development. Rothschild offered ideas of his own and actually devised some new technology himself. He made introductions to heads of major British organizations like the AWRE (Atomic Weapons Research Establishment), which led to further expansion of MI5's R & D.

    Later when Wright was deeply involved in 'mole' hunting there were two Soviet code names, which in particular interested him: DAVID and ROSA. The messages decoded indicated that they had worked together, most likely as a married couple. The Soviet defector Golitsyn asked for the files of all MI5 officers who had been working for British Intelligence at the time of the Venona traffic. He studied the files and after a week asked Wright to come and see him in Brighton. Golitsyn pointed to two files on the desk in the study. 'I've discovered DAVID and ROSA,' he said 'My methodology has uncovered them.' Wright knew the names on the files well. They belonged to Victor and Tess Rothschild., both of whom had served in MI5. Wright told him not to be absurd, Rothschild, he informed the Russian, was one of the best friends this Service ever had. Golitsyn, however, was emphatic

    Fortunately for Rothschild, his close companion and confidant, Wright had been the one informed and there was no further investigation.. Golitsyn had earlier informed Wright about a file marked 'Technics' in a safe at the Moscow Centre. It was basically a file on all the MI5 technical operations which Wright and his team had initiated. This proved to him that a mole had indeed been spying directly upon him and his activities. Wright never discussed with Golitsyn what he had told Rothschild. If he had, the Russian would have realized that his 'methodology' might have been accurate. According to an MI5 source, Rothschild was later fed information, which ended up 'in the wrong place' However, just as Philby had survived for so long, because his colleagues and the establishment simply couldn't accept his treachery, so the argument goes, Rothschilds charmed life continued.

    Later, when Rothschild feared that journalists might link him to his close friend Anthony Blunt, he put a by now retired Wright and journalist Chapman Pincher in touch. The resulting series of collaborative books, 'Their Trade is Treachery;' and 'Too Secret Too Long' neatly deflected suspicion onto Roger Hollis and away from Rothschild. Wright's own book 'Spycatcher' would later reinforce the image that Hollis was the damaging 'mole'. Rothschild apparently quite alarmed about being implicated begged Wright to "write down every single point he could recall of the ways Rothschild had helped MI5" he added, "Things are starting to get rough" Rothschild also secretly channelled cash to Wright via a Swiss bank.

    Rothschild was thought by many to be more loyal to his Jewish heritage than anything English. According to both CIA and Mossad sources, Rothschild was very useful to the Israelis in 'mending fences' with some neighbours in the Middle East after the disruption of the Six-Day conflict. For instance, he called on his old friend the Shah of Iran and suggested several 'crop breeding' ventures, which had been perfected in Israel and elsewhere. Some were adapted in Iran. To many observers Rothschild may have been an unwilling Soviet asset after the war until 1963, but their can be no doubt that he would have willingly spied for Israel. In fact Philby claims that on leaving MI5 in 1947, Rothschild had seized or copied all the six by four file cards listing known or supposed Soviet agents in Europe and elsewhere.

    Rothschild must have certainly come under suspicion for it is believed that he was investigated and interviewed no less than eleven times by MI5, and when in 1986 he wrote a very public letter avowing his innocence, Mrs Thatcher's response was the famously terse "we have no evidence he was ever a Soviet agent". As a clearance it was less than fulsome. Though when Rothschild died in 1990, Thatcher attended the memorial. The publication of 'The Fifth Man' was greeted in dignified silence by Rothschilds family.

    Rothschilds role in MI5 and within the scientific community is considerable, his role with Shell and later as Head of Prime Minister Edward Heath's 'Think Tank' in the early seventies makes him an important player in post war history. If eventually sufficient information became available to prove beyond doubt Roland Perry's belief in his treachery, then Rothschild will certainly have created history for himself, as the most important Soviet Spy in history.
    CommentsThe original 2000 and 2002 Workbooks for Spy School were based on the information in "Spy Book, The Encyclopedia of Espionage, by Norman Polmar and Thomas B. Allen." and"Espionage, An Encyclopedia of Spies and Secrets by Richard Bennett ".
    DISCLAIMER: THE POSTING OF STORIES, COMMENTARIES, REPORTS, DOCUMENTS AND LINKS (EMBEDDED OR OTHERWISE) ON THIS SITE DOES NOT IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, IMPLIED OR OTHERWISE, NECESSARILY EXPRESS OR SUGGEST ENDORSEMENT OR SUPPORT OF ANY OF SUCH POSTED MATERIAL OR PARTS THEREIN.

    BLOG ARCHIVE


    ABOVE ALL ALL MEMBERS OF THE EVIL CRIMINALLY INSANE ROTHSCHILD FAMILY WHICH INCLUDE BARRON NATHAN ROTHSCHILD, BARRON ADOLPH ROTHSCHILD, BARRON ALOLPH HITLER-ROTHSCHILD AND BARRON LIONEL ROTHSCHILD


    SUNDAY, OCTOBER 18, 2009

    DO JEWS RUN THE SECURITY SERVICES?Britain's security service, MI6

    On 8 October 2009, MI5's Jewish terrorism fear was reported on by The Jewish Chronicle

    The Jewish Chronicle tells us that in his new book about Britain's security services, The Defence of the Realm, Professor Chistopher Andrew quotes one MI5 section head, John Marriot, as saying in 1955 that "our policy is to avoid recruiting Jews if possible." Andrew's book has one chapter on the threat from Jewish terrorists, such as the Irgun and Stern Gang which carried out attacks on British troops in Palestine. In 1947 the Colonial Office in London was targeted by a Stern Gang bomb. In 1947, the Stern Gang sent letter bombs to British politicians. In 1947, grenades and detonators were discovered, by his chauffeur, in the boot of the car of Harry Isaac Presman of north London.
    Professor Andrew relates how British spy Kim Philby, one of the five Cambridge spies who worked for Russia, was recruited for the KGB by Arnold Deutsch, a Jew. In the 1970s MI5 was worried about the Jewish business cronies of Prime Minister Harold Wilson, Joseph Kagan, Rudy Sternberg and Harry Kissin. Kagan was linked to a KGB officer.

    Victor Rothschild joined MI5 during the Second World War. In 1940 Rothschild suggested that Anthony Blunt should be invited to join the secret service. He also rented a house to his friend Guy Burgess. After the liberation of France Rothschild worked withDick WhiteKim Philby and Malcolm Muggeridge at theMI6offices established at the Rothschild family mansion in Paris.Edward Heath, in 1970, appointed him head of the government's Central Policy Review Staff. Later Margaret Thatcher appointed Rothschild as her unofficial security adviser.

    In The Defence of the Realm, by Christopher Andrew we are told that until 1997 recruitment for the UK security services was based on personal recommendation. That could mean fascists choosing their fascist friends; or Zionists choosing their Zionist friends. We are led to believe that "right up to the mid-1970s, the post-war Service refused to recruit Jews on the grounds that a dual loyalty to both Britain and Israel might create a conflict of interest." (The Defence of the Realm by Christopher Andrew ) This is misleading. In 1951, the security services discovered that five of their top employees, recruited at Cambridge University in the 1930s, were spies for the Soviet Union, a country which exchanged secrets with Israel. At least one of the 'Cambridge Five' had links to Israel.

    Reportedly, Kim Philby was assisted in obtaining safe haven in the Soviet Union by the Israeli Mossad (cf. Sunday Telegraph, April 16, 1989) CachedLord Victor Rothschild was allegedly one of the Cambridge spies;Guy Burgess was close to Rothschild.

    According to ex-KGB Colonel 'F' and KGB officer Yuri Modin, Victor Rothschild was the key to most of the Cambridge ring's penetration of British Intelligence. According to Roland Perry, in his book The Fifth Man: "Burgess, at MI6 (and still on a retainer from Rothschild) recommended Philby for a job in Section D of MI6. "Rothschild, who had helped nudge Burgess into his position before the war, had been in turn recommended to MI5 by Burgess." "'Rothschild had the contacts,' Modin noted. 'He was able to introduce Burgess, Blunt and others to important figures in Intelligence such as Stewart Menzies, Dick White and Robert Vansittart, the Permanent Under-secretary of State in the Foreign Office, who controlled MI6.'" According to Perry, Rothschild "made sure Russia's scientists had the basics of every secret project from biological warfare to radar and the various types of potential nuclear bomb."



    Soon after Israel was formed, Rothschild was allegedly involved with Chaim Weizmann in setting up a special nuclear physics department in a scientific institute in Rehovoth. In 1957, French engineers began building a nuclear reactor at Dimona on the edge of the Negev Desert. Perry believes that while "MI5 inventions and technical advances went on, Rothschild kept in contact with the key figures and digested the reports.
    "This, coupled with his close contact with Dick White, other intelligence chiefs, Wright and the heads of the key research facilities in everything from weapons to radar, meant that Rothschild understood better than anyone in MI6 or MI5 every aspect of British Intelligence, from technical developments to their application in the field..."

    In 1972, Rothschild played a major part in choosing the new head of MI5, Michael Hanley.According to the controversial Eustace Mullins (CHAPTER FIVE - The CIA - 3):

    While CIA station chief in Rome, the CIA's Angleton "worked closely with the Zionist terrorists Teddy Kollek and Jacob Meridor, and later became chief of the Israeli desk at the CIA, helping Philby to set up the lavishly funded international Mossad espionage operation, all paid for by American taxpayers. "A senior CIA security official, C. Edward Petty, later reported that Angleton might be a Soviet penetration agent or mole, but President Gerald Ford suppressed the report. "Top secret files of the CIA and FBI were opened to Philby, despite widespread claims that he was a Soviet agent. "Although he helped Burgess and MacLean defect to Russia in 1951, he continued to work for SIS until 1956, under the protection of Harold MacMillan, who defended him publicly in parliamentary debate. "In 1962 and Englishwoman at a party in Israel said, “As usual Kim is doing what his Russian Control tells him. I know that he always worked for the Reds.” "Miles Copeland says that Philby placed a mole in deep cover in the CIA known as “Mother”. Philby was quoted as saying, “Foreign agencies spying on the U.S. Government know exactly what one person in the CIA wants them to know, no more and no less.”"Philby was finally exposed by a defector, Michael Goleniewski. "On Jan. 23, 1963, Philby left Beirut and defected to Moscow, where he became a Lt. Gen. in the KGB. "On June 10, 1984, Tad Szulc wrote in the Washington Post that Philby was never a Soviet agent, according to CIA memoranda introduced in a lawsuit, but that he was a triple agent. "This explains curious paradoxes in the supposed rivalry between the CIA and the KGB, when certain charmed souls float easily back and forth between the two services. "Agents of either service are “eliminated” when they find out more than is good for them about this odd arrangement."

    Eustace Mullins - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia POSTED BY ANON AT 5:30 AM
    DISCLAIMER: THE POSTING OF STORIES, COMMENTARIES, REPORTS, DOCUMENTS AND LINKS (EMBEDDED OR OTHERWISE) ON THIS SITE DOES NOT IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM, IMPLIED OR OTHERWISE, NECESSARILY EXPRESS OR SUGGEST ENDORSEMENT OR SUPPORT OF ANY OF SUCH POSTED MATERIAL OR PARTS THEREIN

    SUNDAY, JANUARY 23, 2005

    MI5 and MI6

    Britain's MI5 has been infiltrated.

    Who now controls Britain? Or America? Or the world?

    PART ONE - INFILTRATION BY RUSSIANS ONLY?
    Peter Wright and Chapman Pincher pointed out that vast numbers of Britain's secrets ended up in the hands of the Soviets. Wright and Pincher even suggested that Roger Hollis, onetime head of MI5, was a spy for Russia.

    Russia has turned out to be a country with an almost Third World economy and military.

    Soviet defector Viktor Suvorov, in his book 'The Liberators: inside the Soviet Army', 1981, portrayed the Soviet armed forces as an "inefficient, cynical, farcical army of conscripts, skiving off at the first opportunity and doing their best to stay permanently smashed on anything they could smoke, drink or inject - the mirror image of wider Soviet society, in short; and about as threatening to NATO as the girl guides."

    But, in the days of the Nazi-Soviet Pact and the Berlin Blockade, Russia was a dangerous enemy. So what about infiltration?

    In 1961 high-ranking KGB officer Anatoli Golitsin defected to the West. Golitsin confirmed that the Soviets had agents within the British secret service, although Golitsin knew them only by their code names.

    In 1968 Golitsin travelled to Britain and was shown documents which contained the code names of unidentified Soviet agents.

    Two code names- David and Rosa - particularly interested Golitsin.

    Golitsin studied the files of MI5 officers, picked out two, and then declared to MI5 Officer Peter Wright: "Your spies are here."

    The files bore the names of Victor and Tess Rothschild.

    Wright told Golitsin that he thought he had got it wrong as Rothschild was one of the best friends MI5 had ever had.

    Wright, MI5's chief scientist and a personal friend of Rothschild, wrote in his book 'Spy catcher' (Heinemann, Australia, 1987) : 'Rothschild was fascinated by my plans for the scientific modernization of MI5...I soon realized that he possessed an enormous appetite for the gossip and intrigue of the secret world, and we were soon swapping stories about some of the more bizarre colleagues he remembered from the war.'

    According to Wright's book, Rothschild, the former very close friend of Russian spies Philby, Burgess and Blunt, had access to most secrets and most of the top people in the Secret service.

    Wright wrote: 'I doubt I have ever met a man who impressed me as much as Victor Rothschild. He is a brilliant scientist, a Fellow of the Royal Society, with expertise in botany and zoology, and a fascination for the structure of spermazotoa. But he has been much, much more than a scientist. His contacts, in politics, in intelligence, in banking, in the Civil Service, and abroad are legendary.'

    In the book 'The Fifth Man', (by Roland Perry, Pan Books London 1994) Roland Perry puts the case that Ted Rothschild was a major spy for Russia and Israel, not the spy known as 'David' but one of the notorious 'ring of five.'

    Ted Rothschild was Nathaniel Mayer VICTOR Rothschild (1910 to 1990), the third Lord Rothschild. He was the British head of the famous banking dynasty, which had financed the British army at the Battle of Waterloo and financed the purchase of the Suez Canal for Great Britain.

    The Rothschilds had their own 'spy network' and knew that Napoleon had been defeated at Waterloo before this was known to the governments of Britain or France. The first Lord Rothschild, had been 'a powerful back-room manipulator of late Victorian politics.' He had taken an interest in the extension of Cecil Rhodes diamond empire and the attempts to destroy the Liberal Party.

    The Rothschilds were perhaps seen as being the chief representatives of Zionism. In the famous Balfour Declaration of 1917, Britain's Foreign Secretary wrote the 'declaration' to Lord Walter Rothschild, Victor's uncle: "Dear Lord Rothschild,... His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object."

    Why might Victor Rothschild have spied for foreign powers?

    It has been speculated that Rothschild was "more loyal to his Jewish heritage than anything English."

    In the 1930's one of his main concerns was how to help Jews who were being persecuted in Germany. He allegedly saw the Soviets as the only people who could ensure Hitler's defeat. Some have suspected that he helped the Soviet spy machine and did so because it was the enemy of Nazi Germany.

    After World War II, Rothschild assisted in the creation of a homeland for the Jews. According to one critic: "When the British tried to thwart the birth of Israel, which would have upset its power base in the Middle East, Rothschild intrigued against British interests."

    When Israel was established Rothschild allegedly helped Israel to gain the spy technology and nuclear weaponry which would defend it.

    It has been suggested by Roland Perry that Rothschild was recruited by the soviet agent known as Otto. "Philby, Blunt and Burgess had warned Otto that Rothschild had to be reeled in on the Jewish, anti-Hitler line."

    Rothschild was not a fan of Stalin; he knew that Russia also had its pogroms. But Otto could have pointed out to Rothschild that there was a danger that Britain might team up with Germany in order to defeat Stalin and communism.

    In the 1930's there were many fans of Hitler among right-wing people in the City of London, in the British media and in parliament.

    "Otto spoke of the financial, military and trade deals on-going between Germany and Britain."

    According to ex-KGB Colonel 'F' and KGB officer Yuri Modin, Rothschild was the key to most of the Cambridge ring's penetration of British Intelligence.

    According to Perry, "Burgess, at MI6 (and still on a retainer from Rothschild) recommended Philby for a job in Section D of MI6. Rothschild, who had helped nudge Burgess into his position before the war, had been in turn recommended to MI5 by Burgess."

    'Rothschild had the contacts,' Modin noted. 'He was able to introduce Burgess, Blunt and others to important figures in Intelligence such as Stewart Menzies, Dick White and Robert Vansittart, the Permanent Under-secretary of State in the Foreign Office, who controlled MI6.'

    In a Lords' debate on 'The Situation in Palestine' on 31 July 1946, Victor Rothschild indicated that "He would put the same fervour into setting up Israel as he had done in defeating Hitler.' Rothschild hoped that the powerful Jewish lobby in the USA, with which he had good contacts, would gain US support for a homeland.

    But Rothschild may also have been hoping for some help from the Russians. According to Perry, 'The KGB were hoping that Rothschild could still help them as they geared up their efforts to steal Western bomb intelligence. He was secretly anti-American when it came to their drive to be the biggest military power and, like Oppenheimer, he was keen to do what he could to create a 'balance of terror', where each of the superpowers had the bomb as a deterrent to each other's aggression."

    In 1946 Rothschild was lobbying with some success for more Jews to be allowed to travel from Russia to Palestine.

    According to Perry, Rothschild "made sure Russia's scientists had the basics of every secret project from biological warfare to radar and the various types of potential nuclear bomb."

    Soon after Israel was formed, Rothschild was allegedly involved with Chaim Weizmann in setting up a special nuclear physics department in a scientific institute in Rehovoth.

    In 1956, Britain, France and Israel secretly worked out plans to invade Egypt so as to get back control of the Suez Canal from President Nasser.

    It was after the Suez Affair that the French promised to supply Israel with a nuclear reactor and some uranium.

    The secret deal was only known to about a dozen individuals, induding Rothschild.

    In 1957, French engineers began building a nuclear reactor at Dimona on the edge of the Negev Desert.

    Perry believes that while "MI5 inventions and technical advances went on, Rothschild kept in contact with the key figures and digested the reports. This, coupled with his close contact with Dick White, other intelligence chiefs, Wright and the heads of the key research facilities in everything from weapons to radar, meant that Rothschild understood better than anyone in MI6 or MI5 every aspect of British Intelligence, from technical developments to their application in the field...... Thanks to Rothschild the KGB knew of every development and were able to take steps to counter them. Furthermore, they used the technology themselves against Western agents."

    And what about the CIA?

    According to Wright, American top spook James Angleton "was already suspicious of Rothschild. He had first annoyed Jim on his patch. Jim had special connections with Israel and he felt the British [Intelligence] through Rothschild were interfering..."

    Angleton also took note of Rothschild's support of Israel. In the 1940s it ran contrary to British interests. He was serving both MI5 and (what was to become) Mossad. If he was capable of serving two agencies, could he secretly serve a third? Angleton 'worried about Israel's left-wing politics when it was formed. He was concerned that some of the British agents [including Rothschild] had been happy with that. But not Jim. He wanted them to be a wholesome [laughs] anti-communist US satellite. That took a little time [laughs].'

    In 1962, the year after Golitsin defected, Russian spy Kim Philby was working in the Middle East as a journalist for the Observer. His articles on Israel were seen as being 'anti-Israel' and did not please top friends of Israel such as Rothschild.

    At a party at Weizmann's house in Israel, Rothschild met Flora Solomon, 'a Russian emigre Zionist', former close friend of Philby's, and executive of Marks and Spencer.

    According to Wright, Solomon 'had obviously been in the thick of things in the mid-1930s, part inspiration, part fellow accomplice, and part courier for the fledgling Ring of Five, along with her friends Litzi Philby, and Edith Tudor Hart.'

    Now Solomon and Rothschild suddenly announced that Solomon had decided to denounce Philby. "The reason? Philby's pieces in the Observer about Israel. She was saying that their anti-Israel slant had 'angered' her."

    According to Perry: "In August 1962, a few months after British Intelligence planned to move against Philby but not put him on trial, Rothschild was in Rehovoth, Israel. He made contact with a fellow Mossad agent, who was despatched to Beirut to contact Philby and brief him on the latest attitude of White and Hollis towards him. They were now planning to interrogate him in Beirut. He would probably be offered immunity in exchange for a full confession."

    According to Perry, it wasn't just Philby who was in difficulty.

    Rothschild was interrogated by MI5 eleven times. Rothschild said, "I was questioned very extensively. The authorities, as I call them, said that they wished to talk to me and they talked in quite a friendly way. I have a feeling that they believed in me."

    According to former MI6 agent James Rusbridger, Peter Wright and another MI5 source, Rothschild was fed information in 1962, which ended up 'in the wrong place' - namely with the KGB.

    Perry writes: "This did not prove he had spied, for the data just conceivably could have been stolen from him. Yet it raised suspicions. However, Rothschild still managed to convince people that he and Tess were victims by association. Their friends Guy, Anthony, Kim, Michael, Leo and so on, with whom they dined, drank, studied, lived and worked, had duped them."

    Rothschild was able to continue his links with MI5.

    Wright did not suspect that Rothschild was a spy for Russia, but Wright did suspect that MI5 boss Hollis and prime minister Harold Wilson might be spies for the enemy.

    In the US, the CIA.s Angleton was becoming yet more suspicious that Rothschild was a spy for the enemy. However, Rothschild improved his image with Angleton by emphasising his Mossad (Israeli secret service) links; Angleteon was always in favour of close CIA links to Mossad.

    Rothschild also improved his image by doing work for MI6 induding running agents in China in the late 1960's.

    In 1972, Rothschild played a major part in choosing the new head of MI5, Michael Hanley, a man whom Wright considered to be a disappointment.


    PART TWO WHO CONTROLS BRITAIN?

    In the 1960's, leading CIA agent James Angleton was worried about Harold Wilson and his links to Eastern European businessmen who might have had links to Russia and Israel.

    An Israeli spy had suggested that Labour leader Gaitskell had been murdered by the KGB so that Wilson could become PM.

    In 1965 Angleton, and President Johnson, decided to commission a report on Britain's secret services.

    This report recommended sending more spies to Britain It seemed that the CIA was going to treat Britain like Indonesia or Pakistan.

    In order to ensure that there was an elite which would support US interests, the CIA would try to gain control of MI5 and MI6, use dirty tricks to get rid of anti-American politicians, and place pro-American puppets into positions of power.

    In 1996, in the Guardian, Martin Kettle suggested that New Labour was all about Britain being in with the Americans.

    In a talk to Labour Party branches in 1996, Robin Ramsay (Lobster Magazine) pointed out some interesting links between New labour and the USA.

    Jonathan Powell, Blair's top man in Downing Street, used to work in Britain's Washington embassy and is suspected by some of having been our spook liaising with the CIA.

    Top Blair aid David Milliband did a degree at the USA's MIT and Brown's top aid Edward Balls went to Harvard.

    Gordon Brown spent his holidays in the library at Harvard.

    The US encouraged large numbers of Labour MPs to take free trips to America (Israel also invited a large number of Labour MPs to Israel).

    In 1986 Tony Blair went on a US-sponsored trip to America and came back a supporter of the nuclear deterrent.

    In 1993 Blair attended a Bilderberg Group meeting (secretive right wing organisation) and not long afterwards became Labour leader.

    Four of the Blair cabinet have been members of the Anglo-American elite group the British American Project; three of the Blair cabinet have attended Bilderberg meetings.

    Peter Mandelson become Chair of British Youth Council which began as the British section of the World Assembly of Youth, which was set up and financed by MI6 and then taken over by the CIA in the 1950s. By Mandelson's time in the mid1970s the British Youth Council was said to be financed by the Foreign Office or MI6. According to Ramsay, 'Peter Mandelson has been around MI6 since his early 20s'. Old Labour is the domestic economy; New Labour is the overseas British economy. In other words, the multinationals, the City of London, and the Foreign Office which represents their interests.'

    And the unions?

    According to Ramsay: "The CIA also ran the anti-communist international trade union movement, the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions, the ICFTU..By the mid 1950s nearly a quarter of the TUC's annual budget was going to the ICFTU, a CIA operation.

    And the press?

    According to Ramsay, the security services may be planting disinformation in the media. "Tomlinson told us about the 20-strong I/Ops - Information Operations - unit in that shiny building on the Thames."

    And sometimes the information is confusing. Ramsay writes: "does Gaddafi have Taiwanese Scuds (MI5 story planted in the Sunday Times) or North Korean missiles (MI6 story planted in the Sunday Telegraph.... The Sunday Times was a serious, respectable newspaper until Andrew Neil became its editor in the mid-1980s and turned it into a mouth-piece for MI5 and the MOD to run their rubbish through. The Sunday Telegraph shows all the signs of going down the same dangerous path."

    It looks like the Anglo-American-Israeli elite are in charge.

    Now here is an interesting quote about what may be happening: 'There has been a gradual erosion of civil liberties, an increase in the influence of the army, and an acceptance of corruption among public servants. Vast fortunes have been accumulated by a small group who use their wealth to control the Senate.' That was a description of the Roman Empire, but it could equall y be a description of the present-day Britain, or the US Empire or the former Soviet Empire. It is conspiracies from within, rather than conspiracies from without, which often lead to the collapse of empires.

    PART THREE - WHO RUNS AMERICA AND THE WORLD?

    "We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it."-- Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, October 3, 2001, to Shimon Peres, as reported on Kol Yisrael radio.

    When Clinton was about to step down, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak asked President Clinton to grant a pardon to Marc Rich. Clinton granted the pardon. Marc Rich had been indicted in a US federal court of evading more than $48 million in taxes. He was also charged with 51 counts of tax fraud and with running illegal oil deals with Iran during the hostage crisis. He had also traded with Libya, South Africa and the USSR when there were embargos, with Iraq when there was conflict....

    Is Israel in charge? No. But it could be the people who trade in oil, in guns, in drugs....

    In 1991, Paul Henderson, managing director of machine tools company Matrix Churchill, was in court facing a seven year jail sentence for selling to Iraq materials that could be used for military purposes. Government ministers tried to prevent the court from discovering the truth - that Paul Henderson had been working for the British government as a secret agent for 17 years.

    Eventually the truth about Henderson came out.

    But why had we been helping Iraq? The July 29, 1991 issue of TIME MAGAZINE stated :"B.C.C.I. is the largest corporate criminal enterprise ever... the most pervasive money-laundering operation ...ever created for the likes of Manuel Noriega, Ferdinand Marcos, Saddam Hussein and the Columbian drugs lords." B.C.C.I. Got into the U.S. banking industry by secretly buying the shares of First American Bank, whose chairman is Clark Clifford- a founder of the CIA According to sources, "B.C.C.I. was engaged in international bribery, blackmail, and assassination of government officials at the highest levels.
    The CIA used B.C.C.I. to facilitate funding of the Contras, illegal arms sales to Iran and Iraq as well as the arms supply to the Afghan resistance. The Justice Department began by obstructing the investigation. "B.C.C.I. maintained accounts for Contra leader Adolfo Calero and Sandanista leader, Daniel Ortega, as well as such disparate figures as Noriega, Saddam, Marcos, Adnan Khashoggi, the PLO, the Mossad and the governments of China, Argentina, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Syria and Peru."

    The bank was seemingly financing both sides in a number of conflicts. Who gained? The arms and drugs industries. Cynics might say that wars help the ruling elites to stay in power. And here are some strange 'facts' picked up from various sources: The U.S. sold $50 billion dollars worth of weapons to Iraq before the gulf war. Libya was supplied with hundreds of Green Beret trainers and 42,000 lbs of C-4 plastic explosives prior to U.S. attacks on Libya.

    The U.S financed the Kama River truck plant which produced the trucks for Russia's Afghanistan invasion and built the highways used by the Russian tanks. The day General McArthur signed the peace treaty with Japan half the weapons stored on Okinawa were shipped to Ho Chi Minh and General Giap who met these shipments at the docks of Hai Phong harbor with Lucien Conein, the CIA case officer for Diem. Jonathan Kwitny's book, The Crimes of Patriots, a True Tale of Dope, Dirty Money and the CIA, (Simon & Shuster 1987) is an expose of th e alleged role of the CIA in the drugs business. Kwitny refers to the Nugan-Hand Bank- an Australian money laundering operation set up to facilitate Golden Triangle heroin trafficking. Major officers of the bank "included Admiral Buddy Yates (President), General Erle Cocke, General Edwin Black, General LeRoy Manor, and ex-CIA Director, William Colby with other CIA affiliated persons too numerous to mention."
    POSTED BY ANON AT 6:59 PM
    nternational Intelligence
    On Saturday night's program, Gordon Thomas, author of Secret Wars and Gideon's Spies, joined Ian for a discussion on international intelligence matters.

    Thomas shared breaking news from Britain's MI5 and MI6 intelligence agencies about the possibility of attacks by terrorists during the upcoming G20 summit. Thomas said the threats against the UK are at the "top end of severe," which means an "attack is coming." According to Thomas, Britain is home to the largest number of homegrown jihadists in the world, trained and ready to launch Mumbai-style attacks when the G20 nations meet on April 2 in London. Preventing the attack may prove difficult, Thomas explained, as MI5 officials have been bogged down by spies from France and Germany sent into the country to bribe key workers in sensitive jobs who are having financial troubles.

    Thomas reported on a ruthless group of government assassins known as Company 14, who he said are hunting down members of the IRA responsible for killing two British soldiers and a policeman in Northern Ireland. He also commented on the death of Dr. David Kelly. The position of his body, suspicious phone calls, and other puzzling details surrounding his apparent suicide suggest the weapons expert may have been murdered for his assessment of Iraq's WMD program, Thomas noted.
    hat got me about this show was that he covered the relationships of MI5 - CIA and the MOSSAD and made it sound like a very cozy relationship. No reference to the Israeli spy ring in the U.S. following the "hijackers" and the DEA. or Amdoc's and NICE Systems.

    Nor did he cover the spying and continuing attempts of the U.K. for over 100 years to control and subjugate the U.S.A.

    Evidence points to breakdown in US / UK Relations 

    Related Link on the history of the "Special Relationship"

    Webster G. Tarpley Debunks Pearl Harbor Myths (Amongst Other Things) 

    Something interesting : British Security Coordination (Propaganda) Spy Ring in the U.S. prior to Pearl Harbor

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/ 2006/aug/19/military. secondworldwar

    It was 1940, the Nazis were in the ascendant, the Blitz at its deadliest, and Britain's last hope was to bring a reluctant United States into the war. So it was that the largest covert operation in UK history was launched. William Boyd sheds light on a forgotten spy ring.

    William Boyd
    The Guardian, Saturday 19 August 2006

    "British Security Coordination". The phrase is bland, almost defiantly ordinary, depicting perhaps some sub-committee of a minor department in a lowly Whitehall ministry. In fact BSC, as it was generally known, represented one of the largest covert operations in British spying history; a covert operation, moreover, that was run not in Occupied France, nor in the Soviet Union during the cold war, but in the US, our putative ally, during 1940 and 1941, before Pearl Harbor and the US's eventual participation in the war in Europe against Nazi Germany.
    ...
    One easily forgets this, in the era of our much-vaunted, so-called "special relationship", but at the nadir of Britain's fortunes, polls in the US still showed that 80% of Americans were against joining the war in Europe. Anglophobia was widespread and the US Congress was violently opposed to any form of intervention.
    .... read the rest..
    http://www.larouchepub.com/ other/2005/3232aipac_indict. html

    This article appears in the August 12, 2005 issue of Executive Intelligence Review.

    Larry Franklin Case:
    AIPAC Leaders Snared 

    by Jeffrey Steinberg

    On Aug. 4, the U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Paul McNulty, announced the indictment of two former top officials of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), on charges of "conspiracy to communicate national defense information to persons not entitled to receive it." The same indictment included new espionage charges against Pentagon desk officer and Air Force Reserve Colonel Lawrence Franklin, who has already been indicted in the Eastern District, as well as in West Virginia.

    The two "ex"-AIPAC officials are Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman. Since 1982, Rosen has been AIPAC's Director of Foreign Policy Issues. Since 1993, Weissman has been Senior Middle East Analyst at AIPAC.

    Before coming to work for AIPAC, Rosen had been employed from 1978-82 at the RAND Corporation. During that period, he worked on contract projects for the Central Intelligence Agency, and had top-level security clearances. Thus, Rosen signed written secrecy agreements with the U.S. government that remained binding after he went to work for AIPAC.

    Far-Flung Espionage Network
    The new indictments, which have been anticipated for several months, unveil an Israeli espionage network that has been functioning since at least April 1999, involving a number of Pentagon officials beyond Franklin, as well as at least three officials of the Israeli Embassy and a former senior Mossad officer, Uzi Arad, who now heads Israel's premier national security think-tank, the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Center.[/color]

    U.S. intelligence officials have told EIR that the AIPAC/Franklin case reveals a new modus operandi, adopted by Israel intelligence, in the aftermath of the disastrous Jonathan Pollard spy scandal of the mid-1980s. Pollard, a Naval intelligence analyst, was caught pilfering thousands of classified Pentagon and CIA documents and passing them on to an Israeli intelligence unit headed by former Mossad European operations director Rafi Eytan, a close ally of current Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

    As the result of the blowback from the Pollard affair, according to the U.S. intelligence sources, Israel shifted its espionage operations targetted at the United States to think-tanks and lobbying organizations like AIPAC, which have ongoing "legitimate" contacts with American government officials.

    What the Israelis and the AIPAC spooks did not anticipate was that their operations would be closely scrutinized by the FBI and other U.S. agencies, for at least the past six years, revealing numerous instances where the "legitimate" contacts crossed over into hard espionage.

    The 26-page indictment is, in fact, a catalogue of scores of instances of classified information being passed from Pentagon officials to the two AIPAC men, on to Israeli Embassy personnel.

    Franklin apparently walked into an ongoing FBI counterintelligence surveillance of Rosen and Weissman, when he held his first meeting with the two men on Feb. 12, 2003. According to the indictment, phone conversations that Rosen had en route to the first meeting with Franklin, were monitored by the FBI. From Feb. 12, 2003 until July 9, 2004, Franklin had dozens of phone discussions and meetings with the two AIPAC officials, and on at least one occasion, faxed a document from his Pentagon office to Rosen's home.

    In June 2004, FBI agents confronted Franklin with evidence of his espionage activities, and Franklin agreed to cooperate with the government. His subsequent meetings with the two AIPAC officials were all controlled by the FBI, until Aug. 3, when the FBI visited both Rosen and Weissman. According to the indictment, even after the FBI visits, Rosen and Weissman continued to pass classified data provided by Franklin to select U.S. journalists and even to Israeli embassy officials.

    Franklin's Network
    Lawrence Franklin had his own problems with his dealings with Israeli intelligence officials, even before his assignment to the Pentagon in early 2001 as Iran desk officer at the Near East South Asia policy office, under Assistant Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith and Deputy Assistant Secretary William Luti, a transplant from the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney.

    Back in the late 1990s, as an Air Force Reserve officer, Franklin had done two tours of duty at the U.S. Embassy in Israel, in the Air Attaché's Office. On his second tour, Franklin was kicked out of the country by the Air Attaché after a few months, after repeated incidents in which he held unauthorized meetings with Israeli intelligence officials.

    It may have been these Israeli connections that landed Franklin his job at NESA—or perhaps his ties to then-Deputy Secretary of Defense Paul Wolfowitz, who was Dean of Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, D.C. when Franklin was a graduate student there.

    Whatever his pathway to the Pentagon, Franklin, according to eyewitness sources, became a fixture at regular "brown bag lunches" at the private office of Doug Feith attended by leading Pentagon neo-cons, including Harold Rhode, Luti, Abraham Shulsky, Richard Perle, and occasionally Wolfowitz. Franklin's NESA boss, Luti, boasted frequently that he was working for "Scooter," a reference to Dick Cheney's Chief of Staff, Lewis Libby. (Libby, when he was not working for the government, was the personal attorney for Mossad frontman and international swindler Marc Rich. Well-informed U.S. intelligence officials believe that Rich, a Zug, Switzerland-based metal trader, was set up in business with Mossad funds.)

    Franklin was also a traveling companion of Iran-Contra figure and self-professed "universal fascist" Michael Ledeen, in December 2001. Ledeen, Franklin, and Harold Rhode travelled to Rome for secret meetings with Iranian con-artist Manucher Ghorbanifar, another prominent Iran-Contra scandal figure who brokered Israeli missile sales to Iran in exchange for efforts to free American hostages in Lebanon.The scheme led to criminal indictments against a number of Reagan-Bush Administration officials and CIA officers, including Elliott Abrams and Duane Claridge.

    The latest Franklin indictment threatens to snare some of these other leading neo-cons. The court papers filed in the Eastern District of Virginia identify several other Pentagon officials, along with at least three Israeli Embassy officials and Uzi Arad, as players in the extended Franklin spy operation.

    The indictment of "Mr. AIPAC," Steven Rosen, also raises serious questions about the future of "America's Pro-Israel Lobby," as AIPAC's website describes the group. According to sources close to the Franklin probe, AIPAC may be forced, as a result of the Franklin case, to register as a foreign agent organization, thus losing its tax-exempt status and forcing much closer accounting of its finances and activities.

    The Franklin case has not even come close to fully unraveling. And many leading Pentagon neo-cons are losing sleep over where this case will go next.

    What makes matters even worse, the same basic cast of characters is tied up in the Valerie Plame Wilson leak probe, headed by independent counsel Patrick Fitzgerald, and a separate probe, headed by U.S. Attorney McNulty, into who was behind the forging of Niger government documents which purported to show that Iraq sought to buy "yellowcake" uranium from the African state to build nuclear weapons. The forged documents were used by Vice President Cheney and other Administration war hawks to win Congressional and public support for the invasion of Iraq. Plame's husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, was dispatched to Niger in 2002 to assess the validity of the Niger yellowcake charge, and returned to report that it was a hoax. His report was covered up, and the train of events was set into motion which led to his wife's "outing" as a covert CIA operative, by top Administration officials—a criminal offense.

    There are allegations that the Ledeen-Rhode-Franklin trip to Rome in 2001 may have played a role in the circulation of the forged documents
    http://www.larouchepac.com/ node/9423

    Netanyahu Slaps U.S. in the Face with Spymaster Uzi Arad

    March 6, 2009 (LPAC)--Israel's Prime Minister-designate Bibi Netanyahu brought the notorious spymaster Uzi Arad into the meetings with Hillary Clinton and George Mitchell, this week, reports the Israeli newspaper, Ha'aretz. Uzi Arad, is persona non grata in the United States because of his involvement with Pentagon spy, Larry Franklin, an analyst with the Office of Special Plans (OSP), the Dick Cheney-neo-conservative unit in the Pentagon that manufactured false intelligence to justify the Iraq war. Franklin was convicted in January, 2006, in a plea bargain, of stealing classified documents on Iran and other subjects from the Pentagon, and passing them on to Israeli government officials, in meetings arranged by the two top officials of AIPAC (American Israel Public Affairs Committee), Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman). Arad, who is unable to come to the U.S. because of his involvement with Franklin, is reportedly going to be head of the Israeli National Security Council, Ha'aretz wrote.

    Not only did Bibi include Arad in his first meeting with the top U.S. officials, but he kicked the Israeli Ambassador to the U.S., Sallai Meridor out the meeting. Ha'aretz reported that this insult from Netanyahu was the reason that Meridor resigned today.

    Lyndon LaRouche said today that what Netanyahoo did was "a slap in the face to the U.S. And that if Netanyahoo breaks from the U.S., that represents Netanyahoo's plans for leaving earth."
    So, does the Pentagon really have a great relationship with Mossad? i dont think so.

    And who is really behind Netanyahu? a group of fascists in London that put Dick Cheney into office.
    "Liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers, liquidate real estate … It will purge the rottenness out of the system..." - Andrew Mellon, Secretary of Treasury, 1929.
    One thing the Brit's love is to have THEIR historians write THEIR history. And I think we can label Gordon Thomas one of THEIR's and a propagandist TOOL.


    http://intelligencenews. wordpress.com/2009/03/21/01- 107/

    ...

    The other two are an authorized history (from 1909 to 1949) of MI6 by Professor Keith Jeffery, of Queen’s University, Belfast, and Gordon Thomas’ Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence, which intelNews has received and will be reviewing shortly. ...

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Gordon_Thomas

    Thomas was born in Wales, in a cemetery keeper’s cottage where his grandmother lived. He had his first story published at nine years old in a Boys Own Paper competition. With his father in the RAF, he travelled widely and was educated at the Cairo High School, the Maritz Brothers in Port Elizabeth and, finally, at Bedford Modern.

    His first book, completed at the age of seventeen, is the story of a British spy in Russia during World War Two, titled Descent Into Danger.He turned down the offer of a place at university in order to accompany a travelling fair for a year: those experiences became Bed of Nails. Since then his books have been published worldwide. He has been a foreign correspondent beginning with the Suez Crisis and ending with the first Gulf War. He was a BBC writer/producer for three flagship BBC programmes: Man Alive, Tomorrows World and Horizon. He is a regularcontributor to Facta, the respected monthly Japanese news magazine, and he lectures widely on the secret world of intelligence. He also provides expert analysis on intelligence for US and European television and radio shows.[1]

    His Gideon’s Spies: Mossad’s Secret Warriors became a major documentary for Channel Four that he wrote and narrated: The Spy Machine. It followed three years of research during which he was given unprecedented access to Mossad’s key personnel. The documentary was co-produced by Open Media and Israfilm[2].

    Gideon’s Spies: Mossad’s Secret Warriors has so far been published in 16 languages. The main source for this book is Ari Ben-Menashe, a self-described former Mossad agent. According to Charles Foster in Contemporary Review: "Writers who know their place are few and far between: fortunately Mr Thomas is one of them. By keeping to his place as a tremendous storyteller without a preacher's pretensions, he has put his book amongst the important chronicles of the state of Israel." [2]
    Well, what he appears to be doing is scapegoating Mossad when everyone knows London built the Nation of Israel, hence their intelligence agencies are linked.
    So he highlights what Mossad really did, but neglects to highlight the relationship of the Crown, MI6 and Mossad, and their potential Moles in the United States.

    No one mentions Sykes - Picot EITHER, which is the main force behind the destabalization of the middle east right now and was the primary reason for World War I;
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_ depth/middle_east/2001/israel_ and_the_palestinians/key_ documents/1681362.stm
    undefined

    The Sykes-Picot agreement is a secret understanding concluded in May 1916, during World War I, between Great Britain and France, with the assent of Russia, for the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire.
    The agreement led to the division of Turkish-held Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, and Palestine into various French and British-administered areas. The agreement took its name from its negotiators, Sir Mark Sykes of Britain and Georges Picot of France.

    Some historians have pointed out that the agreement conflicted with pledges already given by the British to the Hashimite leader Husayn ibn Ali, Sharif of Mecca, who was about to lead an Arab revolt in the Hejaz against the Ottoman rulers on the understanding that the Arabs would eventually receive a much more important share of the territory won. 





    US history is an interesting thing, and no one really highlights the REASON many intelligent souls traveled to the U.S.

    The Reason was, Europe was infested with feudalist corruption and the idea was, the United States would be built up as a nation to keep Europe from destroying itself. Read about Benjamin Franklin, these people wanted to create a Nation free of Oligarchs and the European monetary system (Which in reality is dependence on Royal Gold Supplies for economic expansion). The European monetary system was controlled by the various royalties until the 1600's when the British Empire began to dominate more and more of Eurasia.

    With the British ability to contract and limit Gold supplies, they had the ability to limit world wide growth hence, the ability to CONTROL the WORLD, by preventing any (NAVAL) force to grow stronger then theirs. Remember, in the 1700's there were no railways, NAVAL power was supreme...... So we can fastfoward to the mid 1800's when Lincoln took office, revived the Greenback and built the intercontintental railway......... what did this accomplish? it DESTROYED British control over US Trade routes by nullfying their NAVAL POWER. This lead to the industrialization of the United States into a power that even the British Empire could not tackle via conventional warfare.

    The Continental Congress issued fiat currency for that exact reason as well, because the European Royalty could strangle the Nation of Currency if we were to use Gold as a currency.
    This is what got my ear's up and my suspicion that there is something going on in the U.K. and the G20 coming up , plus the recent "IRA?" attack....

    Ian p. asked no hard questions that I could discern and the callers were almost praising MI5 and the UK as being our beast friends... 

    With this guy some of his lies are true.


    http://snardfarker.ning.com/ profiles/blog/show?id=2649739% 3ABlogPost%3A37858&page=2# comment-2649739_Comment_37912

    GREAT BRITAIN ON HIGHEST TERRORIST ALERT POSSIBLE!!!!

    3-22-09 Critical Red Alert in Great Britain
    Talk show Host Ian Punnett of Coast to Coast announced that sources have revealed that Britain is on highest-ever terror alert! This information was confirmed by Gordon Thomas who checked with his sources in the British Intelligence who spoke of information of a mumbi attacks.He was on the air speaking with Author Gordon Thomas who was discussing the history of the British Intelligence Services when this information came in as who has ties to British MI5 agents.

    Gordon Thomas wrote the book: Secret Wars: One Hundred Years of British Intelligence inside MI5 and MI6 (US Edition) Inside British Intelligence: 100 Years of MI5 and MI6 (UK Edition) These agencies rank as two of the oldest and most powerful in the world, and Thomas’s recounts the roles that British intelligence played with insider information more startling than anything out of James Bond.

    Gordon Thomas also wrote the book: Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of The Mossad
    which was republished to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the state of Israel in 1948. Updating the data on events leading to the 9/11 Attacks and the aftermath.
    In this book Gordon Thomas claims that; Bibi, Netanyahu's first wife, actually spied on Bill Clinton, and that Mossad had wire tapped the White House. Also that Princess Diana's driver Henry Paul was a Mossad agent.

    More information to come with updates....

    http://www.gordonthomas- author.com/
    This guy really blows. Here he "covers" for the Mossad for spying on us. Oh right, that was a GOOD thing. Too bad WE didn't listen to them....

    http://www.nlpwessex.org/docs/ gordonthomas.htm

    The report below was published 21 May 2002 by the GLOBE-INTEL web site run by Gordon Thomas.
    http://www.canadafreepress. com/writers/gordon-thomas.htm

    • Thomas is a recognised authority on the Israeli intelligence service Mossad, to which he is considered to have had exceptional journalistic access over the years. Thomas is the author of the book 'Gideon's Spies - The Secret History of the Mossad', which susequently became a major documentary for the UK's Channel 4 TV station. Thomas writes on intelligence subjects for the Sunday Express. 

      • The URL of the 21 May 2002 report below by GLOBE-INTEL was http://www.gordonthomas. ie/104.html at the time of publication. The report is, however, no longer available at that address on the GLOBE-INTEL site. A mhtl copy dowloaded from the Internet Archive Wayback Machine (archive date Jun 15, 2007) is available here.


    • The Israeli spy-ring within the United States referred to by Thomas has been separately reported on by Fox News and the intelligence journal Jane's Security News (further references are available from the Antiwar.com web site and History Commons, 'The Complete 9/11 Timeline').


    • The Daily Telegraph has separately reported that Israeli intelligence had visited the CIA in August 2001 to warn of imminent terrorist attacks on America. An extract of this report is provided at the bottom of this page. A full copy of the GLOBE-INTEL report is also provided below


    • More information about the warnings the CIA received from the Israelis and Russians is available here.


    http://www.btinternet.com/~ nlpwessex/Documents/ WATTenetsilence.htm
    GLOBE-INTEL***NEWS*****ANALYSIS**** COMMENTARY
    EDITORS: GORDON THOMAS ***MARTIN DILLON***KEVIN DOWLING
    ------------------------------ ------------------------------ --------------------
    NUMBER :- 104 DATE :- 21/05/02
    BUSH: THE IGNORED WARNING THAT WILL COME TO HAUNT HIM
    By Gordon Thomas.
    Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon authorised the leak of sensitive documents which reveal America's spy agencies were warned about a terrorist strike weeks before September 11. The controversial move has now directly embroiled President George Bush in the 'how-much-did-he-know?' debate over the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
    Sharon's reaction is a calculated response to growing claims that Mossad has been running spy operations within the United States and also reveals a split in the special relationship between the two leaders.
    Mossad chiefs insist the Israeli spy agency was tracking Osama Bin-Laden's terrorists in America before September 11 and that that the information was passed on to the CIA on Five separate occasions before the attacks on the WTC and Pentagon. As late asAugust 24, less than two weeks before the attacks, a Mossad warning, confirmed by German intelligence, BND, said that "terrorists plan to hijack commercial aircraft to use as weapons to attack important symbols of American and Israeli culture." The warning alert was passed to the CIA. 

    • The warning was also passed to MI6. The agency made its own checks and also informed the CIAFrustrated by its inability to alert the CIA to an impending attack, Mossad arranged on September 1, according to Tel Aviv sources last week, for Russian intelligence to warn Washington "in the strongest possible terms of imminent assaults on airports and government buildings." Mossad's fury at the failure of the US intelligence community to act has been compounded by the revelation that the Bush administration had ordered the FBI Only a Week Before the September attacks to curtail investigations on two of Osama Bin-Laden's close relatives living in the US


    state of Virginia at the time.

    • Sharon's decision to allow the story of Bush's prior knowledge of the attack to be leaked comes at a time when Israel is smarting over what Sharon sees as Bush pressurising the Jewish state into an accommodation with Arafat.


    • The feeling in Tel Aviv is that Bush's much hyped war on terrorism does not actually fit into the aggressive policy Israel wants to pursue.


    • Sharon has already suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of his archrival, former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, as the central committee of their Likud Party ruled out the establishment of a Palestinian state last Sunday.


    • The party's decision, formalized in a resolution backed by Netanyahu, directly contradicted Sharon's own stated acceptance of a Palestinian state as the eventual conclusion of Israeli-Palestinian negotiations. It came as Sharon faces mounting domestic and international pressure to find a way to stop more than 19 months of bloodshed and launch talks with the Palestinians. 

      • The support he was expecting from America failed to materialise, said a source close to Mossad. "Ariel Sharon is furious because he thinks Bush has not supported him as fully as he could. His coalition is falling apart, Netanyahu has sneaked ahead of him and the Israelis are generally fed up of living in fear. Sharon is quite clear where the blame lies - in the White House. "Now he has really stirred things up byputting Bush right at the centre of this storm by actively allowing these sensitive documents to be leaked to the world. He feels he needs to teach Bush a lesson and this will certainly complicate America's peace efforts in the region," he said. 

        • According to similar documents shown to the Sunday Express, Mossad was running a round-the-clock surveillance operation on some of the September 11 hijackers.  

      • The details, contained in classified papers, reveal that a senior Mossad agent tipped off his counterpart in America's Central Intelligence Agency that a massive terrorist hit was being planned in the US. A handful of the spies had infiltrated the Al-Qaeda organisation while a staggering 120 others, posing as overseas art students, launched massive undercover operations throughout America.  

      • Other documents leaked to the Sunday Express from several intelligence agencies including the Drugs Enforcement Agency show that two Mossad cells of six Egyptian and Yemeni born Jews, trained at a secret base in Israel's Negev Desert on how to penetrate Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaeda network.


      • One team flew to Amsterdam and were under the control of Mossad's Europe Station. This is based at Schipol Airport within the El Al complex.They later made contact in Hamburg with Mohammed Atta, the lead hijacker on September 11.


    • The second group flew directly to New York. From there they travelled South to Florida and infiltrated the Bin laden organisation.


    • In August last year, the Mossad team in Europe flew with some of the Hamburg terrorists into Boston, a month before the attack on the twin towers.


    • By then the Mossad team had established an attack on the US was "imminent". It reported this to its Tel Aviv controller through the Israeli Embassy in Washington using a system of secure communications. In early September Mossad Chief Efraim Halevy sent a warning to the CIA of the possibility of such an attack. The warning was noted and acknowledged. But CIA chief George Tenet is understood to have described it as "too non-specific." The FBI was also informed.


    • Halevy sent a second alert to the CIA that reached Washington on or around September 7.


    • A spokesman for the FBI refused to discuss specific details of the Mossad operation but said: "There are Congressional hearings with regard to possible intelligence failures arising from September 11. We can't verify your information because it is part of an ongoing investigation."


    • Neither the DEA or the CIA would comment on the record, but a senior US intelligence source said: "Anyone can be wise after the event but it was extremely difficult to act on a non specific threat given in a couple of tips from Israeli intelligence. It would be interesting to know if they could have been more specific with their information.


    • ''Their surveillance teams must have observed Atta and his accomplices going to flying schools. I guess we might never know the real truth." 


    • The spying operations first came to the attention of the DEA in January 2001 according to a classified 90-page dossier which has been seen by the Sunday Express. The names, passport details and other personal records of some of the Israeli-born spies are also detailed in the dossier. 

    (ends)
    he sure does cover for Mossad.....
    they were trying to help us right? by organizing a film crew to watch the towers collapse and cheering?.
    The above article is a dynamite example of how foreign intelligence agencies insert moles into US Government power seats and use them to carry out operations.

     
    Rothchild involved with MI5 CIA and Mossad
     
    ROTHSCHILD, Lord Nathanial Mayer Victor
     
     
     
    Name: ROTHSCHILD, Lord (Nathaniel Mayer Victor)
    Nationality British Occupation:Banker Born:1910 Died: 1990
     
    The startling accusations against Rothschild is that he is the 'Fifth Man', not John Cairncross. According to Roland Perry's book 'The Fifth Man' published in 1994. That he is the dominant member of the Cambridge Spy Ring, not Philby, Blunt, Burgess of Maclean. That he is possibly the most important Soviet Spy of all. Soviet intelligence officer, Yuri Modin added. 'Just as the Three Musketeers were four, so the Cambridge five were six.'

    Rothschild was the British head of the famous banking dynasty, which apart from prolific achievements in art, science, wine and charity. It had shaped recent history by such acts as the financing of the British army at the Battle of Waterloo and the purchasing of the Suez Canal for Great Britain and Prime Minister Disraeli. He was on intimate terms with many of the most senior members of the intelligence and security services Guy Liddell, Roger Hollis, Dick White, Stewart Menzies Maurice Oldfield, Robert Vansittart, the Permanent Under-secretary of State in the Foreign Office and many others.

    It's largely accepted among MI5 officers that during the 1945 to 1963 period, the Soviets were receiving vital information which enabled them to thwart British operations run against the Soviet Embassy and the Intelligence service. MI5 had apparently been penetrated by someone. The inference was always that it had to be an insider. However, one of the leading Soviet double agents working for SIS (MI6), Oleg Gordievsky, who defected to Britain in 1985, denied that the Soviets had anyone of importance on the inside of M15 in the contentious years from around 1950 to 1963. 

    • Rothschild had been in MI5 during World War Two and had been awarded a medal for outstanding bravery for disfusing a new type of German explosive munitions. The argument is that he was recruited for the Soviet cause in pre-war years by playing on his undoubted commitment to a future homeland for the Jews and his anti-Nazi beliefs. Later the fact that he had spied for the Soviets would have been used to blackmail him into continuing to do so, long after it became obvious that Jews were little better treated in the USSR as Nazi Germany. Fear of publicity was to be perhaps the driving force behind his supposed treachery and his later involvement in the Spycatcher affair.


    • In 1958, Rothschild's fostering of Peter Wright turned quickly to patronage on the basis that they were scientists who understood each other. Wright could have been an easy prey for the sophisticated peer. Although talented, Wright was not Oxbridge educated and therefore an outsider in a service which was run by the old-school ties. For the first time in his professional life, Wright felt wanted, understood and appreciated. In this atmosphere, Wright may have spilled everything of importance in his section of MI5. Rothschild offered help. He was in the oil group Shell overseeing scientific development. He seconded staff to MI5. Wright told him about every piece of espionage technology under development. Rothschild offered ideas of his own and actually devised some new technology himself. He made introductions to heads of major British organizations like the AWRE (Atomic Weapons Research Establishment), which led to further expansion of MI5's R & D. 

      • Later when Wright was deeply involved in 'mole' hunting there were two Soviet code names, which in particular interested him: DAVID and ROSA. The messages decoded indicated that they had worked together, most likely as a married couple. The Soviet defector Golitsyn asked for the files of all MI5 officers who had been working for British Intelligence at the time of the Venona traffic. He studied the files and after a week asked Wright to come and see him in Brighton. Golitsyn pointed to two files on the desk in the study. 'I've discovered DAVID and ROSA,' he said 'My methodology has uncovered them.' Wright knew the names on the files well. They belonged to Victor and Tess Rothschild., both of whom had served in MI5. Wright told him not to be absurd, Rothschild, he informed the Russian, was one of the best friends this Service ever had. Golitsyn, however, was emphatic



    Fortunately for Rothschild, his close companion and confidant, Wright had been the one informed and there was no further investigation.. Golitsyn had earlier informed Wright about a file marked 'Technics' in a safe at the Moscow Centre. It was basically a file on all the MI5 technical operations which Wright and his team had initiated. This proved to him that a mole had indeed been spying directly upon him and his activities. Wright never discussed with Golitsyn what he had told Rothschild. If he had, the Russian would have realized that his 'methodology' might have been accurate. According to an MI5 source, Rothschild was later fed information, which ended up 'in the wrong place' However, just as Philby had survived for so long, because his colleagues and the establishment simply couldn't accept his treachery, so the argument goes, Rothschilds charmed life continued.
    Later, when Rothschild feared that journalists might link him to his close friend Anthony Blunt, he put a by now retired Wright and journalist Chapman Pincher in touch. The resulting series of collaborative books, 'Their Trade is Treachery;' and 'Too Secret Too Long' neatly deflected suspicion onto Roger Hollis and away from Rothschild. Wright's own book 'Spycatcher' would later reinforce the image that Hollis was the damaging 'mole'. Rothschild apparently quite alarmed about being implicated begged Wright to "write down every single point he could recall of the ways Rothschild had helped MI5" he added, "Things are starting to get rough" Rothschild also secretly channelled cash to Wright via a Swiss bank.
    Rothschild was thought by many to be more loyal to his Jewish heritage than anything English. According to both CIA and Mossad sources, Rothschild was very useful to the Israelis in 'mending fences' with some neighbours in the Middle East after the disruption of the Six-Day conflict. For instance, he called on his old friend the Shah of Iran and suggested several 'crop breeding' ventures, which had been perfected in Israel and elsewhere. Some were adapted in Iran. To many observers Rothschild may have been an unwilling Soviet asset after the war until 1963, but their can be no doubt that he would have willingly spied for Israel. In fact Philby claims that on leaving MI5 in 1947, Rothschild had seized or copied all the six by four file cards listing known or supposed Soviet agents in Europe and elsewhere.
    Rothschild must have certainly come under suspicion for it is believed that he was investigated and interviewed no less than eleven times by MI5, and when in 1986 he wrote a very public letter avowing his innocence, Mrs Thatcher's response was the famously terse "we have no evidence he was ever a Soviet agent". As a clearance it was less than fulsome. Though when Rothschild died in 1990, Thatcher attended the memorial. The publication of 'The Fifth Man' was greeted in dignified silence by Rothschilds family.
    Rothschilds role in MI5 and within the scientific community is considerable, his role with Shell and later as Head of Prime Minister Edward Heath's 'Think Tank' in the early seventies makes him an important player in post war history. If eventually sufficient information became available to prove beyond doubt Roland Perry's belief in his treachery, then Rothschild will certainly have created history for himself, as the most important Soviet Spy in history.
     
    Comments The original 2000 and 2002 Workbooks for Spy School were based on the information in "Spy Book, The Encyclopedia of Espionage, by Norman Polmar and Thomas B. Allen." and"Espionage, An Encyclopedia of Spies and Secrets by Richard Bennett ".
     
     





Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores

Yahoo Money Converter into any currency

Click here to watch great I Player Features from the BBC 

including 
The American Future: A History, by Simon Schama:

 What is an American?


While the 2008 presidential campaign is in full swing, Simon Schama travels through America to dig deep into
 the conflicts of its history to understand what is at stake right now,,,,

International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year
.com* $9.99 | .net* $9.99 | .org* $9.99 | .info* $9.99 | .us* $9.99 | .biz* $9.99 | .ws* $9.75 | .name* $7.95
Save even more on multi-year registrations!
Visit International News Limited for the best values on: domain names, domain transfers and more!

Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores

INLNews YahooMail HotMail GMail AOLMailUSA MAILYahooMail HotMailGMail AOLMail MyWayMail CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNsNYTimes WashNs AustStockEx 
WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs 
TasNews ABCTas DarwinNsUSA MAIL

USA Economist 
also see 
www.YahooUSANews.com and www.YahooUKNews.com 
for world-USA-UK historical Video News for September and October 2008 

Click here for email login for YahooRealEstate.com.au

Visit International News Limited for the best values on:                     domain names, domain transfers and more!
all from $9.99


International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year
.com* $9.99 | .net* $9.99 | .org* $9.99 | .info* $9.99 | .us* $9.99 | .biz* $9.99 | .ws* $9.75 | .name* $7.95
Save even more on 
multi-year registrations!
Visit 
International News Limited for the best values on: domain names, domain transfers and more!
FULL COVERAGE  News 
Iraq  Zimbabe  Myanmar Radovan KaradzicChina  » All Full Coverage 

ABC News Video  FOX News Video  FOXBusiness Video  CNN Video  AP Video  BBC News Video  Reuters Video  AFP Video  CNET Video
CNBC Video  Australia 7 News Video   Rocky Mountain News Elections Video  CBC.ca Video  NPR Audio  
Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone Video
Richard Bangs Adventures Video  Charlie Rose Video   Expanded Books Video  Assignment Earth Video 
ROOFTOPCOMEDY.com Video 
Guinness World Records Video  weather.com Video  AccuWeather Video  You Witness News User Video

NPR Audio BY CATEGORY Top Stories  Politics  World  Business  Sports  Technology  Health & Science  Arts  U.S. 

VIEW LOCAL VIDEO KVUE-TV Austin  WJZ 13 Baltimore  WBZ Boston  WCNC Charlotte  CBS 2 Chicago

CBS 11 Dallas  CBS4 Denver  13 News, WVEC Hampton Roads  11 News Houston  CBS 2 / KCAL 9 Los Angeles

WHAS TV11 Louisville  CBS4 Miami  WCCO Minneapolis  WWL-TV, Channel 4 New Orleans  CBS 2 New York

CBS 3 Philadelphia KTVK 3TV Phoenix  KDKA Pittsburgh  KGW NewsChannel 8 Portland, Ore.  WRAL.com Raleigh

CBS 13 / CW 31 Sacramento  KENS 5 - TV San Antonio  Channel 8 San Diego  CBS 5 San Francisco

KING5 Seattle  KREM.com Spokane/Coeur d'Alene  KMOV Channel 4 St. Louis  FOX 11 Tucson

Video by Category
 
U.S. Business  World  Entertainment  Sports  Tech  Politics Science Health Environment Weather Opinion  Odd 

Video by Topic Campaign '08   Wall Street  Iraq  Gas Prices  Mideast Conflict  Climate Change 

More INL News Video !Finance Sports

Hi There Welcome to www.YahooRealEstate.co.uk and www.YahooREalEstate.Org
For the Cheapest Real Estate Advertising on the Planet

STUNTMAN: Jon Templeton will act as Hugh Jackman's stunt double in the film Australia. Picture: MEGAN BRAYLE


YahooMail  HotMailGMail  AOLMail  MyWayMail  CNNWorld  IsraelVideoNs  INLNs  NYTimes WashNs

  AustStockEx  WorldMedia  JapanNs  AusNs  World VideoNs  WorldFinance  ChinaDaily IndiaNs  USADaily  BBC  EuroNs  ABCAust  WANs  NZNews  QldNs  

MelbAge  AdelaideNs TasNews  ABCTas  DarwinNs USA MAIL 



Saddam Hussein Died 1999 not on on December 30, 2006.
 when Wikipedia and the other main stream media owned by the same people that are behind the New World Order  told you he died-Why did they lie to the world -  Video one



Saddam Hussein Died 1999 not on on December 30, 2006.
 when Wikipedia and the other main stream media owned by the same people that are behind the New World Order  told you he died-Why did they lie to the world -  Video Two

Unfortunately,e ven though a lot of the information in Wikipedia is true, there is a lot of information in Wikipedia, that is false, misleading. hald truthand ofer also withholds materila facts,
because  often
Wikipedia artilces are actually written by proffesional writers paid by those who want history ot be wirttent he way they want it written, and not the actual truth..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Execution_of_Saddam_Hussein

The execution of Saddam Hussein took place on December 30, 2006. He was sentenced to death by hanging, after being found guilty and convicted of crimes against humanity

 by the Iraqi Special Tribunal for the murder of 148 Iraqi Shi'ites in the town of Dujail in 1982, in retaliation for an assassination attempt against him.

Saddam Hussein was President of Iraq from July 16, 1979 until April 9, 2003, when he was deposed during the 2003 invasion of Iraq by U.S.-led Allied Coalition. After his capture in ad-Dawr, near his hometown Tikrit, he was incarcerated at Camp Cropper. On November 5, 2006, he was sentenced to death by hanging.

On December 30, 2006, he was taken to the prison to be executed. The Iraqi government released an official videotape of his execution, showing him being led to the gallows, and ending after his head was in the hangman's noose. International public controversy arose when an unauthorized cell phone recording of the hanging showed him falling through the trap door of the gallows. The audio, which was not in the official video, revealed taunts between Saddam and the executioners, many of whom were strong supporters of Muqtada Al-Sadr, an Iraqi political leader and militia commander who is a strong opponent of the Coalition Provisional Authority, the succeeding (and current) Shiitedominated Iraqi government and the overall idea of the presence of the United States in Iraq. The unprofessional and undignified atmosphere of the execution drew criticism around the world from nations that both oppose and support capital punishment, including the Bush Administration.

On December 31, 2006, Saddam Hussein's body was returned to his birthplace of Al-Awja, near Tikrit, and was buried near the graves of other family members.

this video proves that the Iraq war was planned a long time before the 911 attack on the World Trade Centre in New York on 11th September, 2001

This video shows David Rockefeller explaininf the New World Order

Zbigniew Brzezinski, says in the old says it was easier ot control one million peopple that ot kill one million people, however in the modern world it is easier to kill one million people that control one million people

Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's national security advisor, who says that Obama offers 'a new definition of
America's role in the world'. As author Holly Sklar has noted,
“In 1973 the Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller, Chase Manhattan Bank chairman, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carter’s national security advisor, and other like-minded ‘eminent private citizens (like George H.W.Bush)’
Some 300 members (up from about 200 members in 1973) are drawn from international business and banking, government, academia, media, and conservative labor. The Commission’s purpose is to engineer an enduring partnership among the ruling classes of North American, Western Europe, and Japan—hence the term ‘trilateral’—in order to
safeguard the interests of Western capitalism in an explosive world. The private Trilateral Commission is attempting to mold public policy and construct a framework for international stability in the coming decades. Throughout this book, trilateralism’ refers to the doctrine of world order advanced by the Commission” 89
Since Obama has included in his camp, the same Brzezinski who created the Illuminati's Trilateral Commission with David Rockefeller in 1973, this raises significant questions regarding his role in the construction of a global government since it is common knowledge of the Illuminati’s quest for a
global government run by a super elite where national borders and boundaries are blurred. Brzenski heads the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). The Council on Foreign Relations is an organization whose mission is to redefine American policy and slide this republic into a one-world
government – a nightmare beyond what most Americans can't even imagine. Brzezinski's foreign 'policy' has known to be an apocalyptic controversial stance, for instance during the Carter administration, his aim as he has since admitted without regret, was to entice the Soviet
Union to invade Afghanistan in December, 1979. The idea, he said, was to weaken a rival superpower and the result was a ten-year occupation that cost the lives of an estimated 1.3 million Afghans and spawned the Mujahedin, Taliban and Osama bin Laden.
Most dangerous of all is that Brzezinski is the mastermind of the massive destabilization of China now ongoing, starting with the CIA/MI-6 Tibet insurrection, which has placed the US on a collision course with China, a superpower with 1.4 billion people and thermonuclear weapons which can strike US
cities. Brzezinski's goal it is said, is a confrontation with the Shanghai Cooperation Organization,90 the main world center for resistance to US-UK global domination. Anti-war activists are still fixated on Iran, but not Brzezinski - his target is China, twenty times bigger than Iran, with ICBMs ready to
launch, followed by Russia, the world's biggest nuclear power. Brzezinski states in his book, "The Grand Chessboard"214 in that for the US New World Order to succeed, China must be defeated. Brzenski, calls it the "Grand Chessboard". The "Grand Chessboard"
is the world stage and all the countries in the world that are to become consolidated into Unions. Rear Adm. Chester Ward was a member of the CFR for 16 years and later warned the American people as to the true intentions of this treasonous operation:
The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common – they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world-banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government. 212.
The appointment of Brzezinski has also elicited much dismay among supporters of Israel since Brzezinski is well known for his aggressive dislike of Israel. He has been an ardent foe of Israel for over three decades and newspaper files are littered with his tirades against Israel. Brzezinski has publicly defended the Walt-Mearsheimer thesis that the relationship between America and Israel is based not on shared values and common threats but is the product of Jewish pressure. Brzezinski also signed a letter demanding dialogue with Hamas-a group whose charter calls for the destruction of Israel and is filled with threats to Jews around the world. Brzezinski's son, Mark, is also on Obama's foreign policy team. Evidently the apple does not fall far from the tree. Mark recently co-wrote an oped advocating that America forge ties with Iran.

Exact of  INLNews report PART III: UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA  THE NEW WORLD ORDER:ORCHESTRATED BY THE ORDER OF THE ILLUMINATI
A MASONIC BLUEPRINT TO LAUNCH THE WORLD ORDER THROUGH WAR
5. CONTROL OF JERUSALEM AND KING SOLOMONS TEMPLE
Mother of All mind control organizations:
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London.
The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people react
with disbelief and scepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with scepticism by institutional and media influences that were created by the
Mother of All mind control organizations: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London. Author and de-programmer Fritz Springmeier says that most people have built in "slides" that short
circuit the mind's critical examination process when it comes to certain sensitive topics. "Slides", Springmeier reports, is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which dead ends a person's
thinking and terminates debate or examination of the topic at hand. For example, the mention of the word "conspiracy" often solicits a slide response with many people. Springmeier has co-authored
three books on trauma-based programming which detail how the Illuminati employs highly tuned and extremely sophisticated Mind Control (MC) training programs that begin the programming process
while the intended victim is still within the womb. Mind Control is a much greater problem than most people realize.
What most Americans believe to be "Public Opinion" is in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public. Public opinion polls are
really taken with the intent of gauging the public's acceptance of the Illuminati's planned programs. A strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that the programing is "taking", while a poor showing
tells the NWO manipulators that they have to recast or "tweak" the programming until the desired response is achieved. While the thrust and content of the propaganda is decided at Tavistock,
implementation of the propaganda is executed in the United States by well over 200 'think tanks' such as the Rand Corporation and the Brookings Institute which are overseen and directed by the top
NWO mind control organization in the United States, the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California.
The general principles of the New World Order is that is a worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an extremely powerful and influential group of genetically-related individuals (at least at the highest echelons) which include many of the world's wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate elite, as well as members of the so-called Black Nobility of Europe (dominated by the British Crown) whose goal is to create a One World (fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and total control over every human being on the planet and to dramatically reduce the world's population by 5.5 Billion people.
While the name New World Order is a term frequently used today when referring to this group, it's more useful to identify the principal organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.
The Illuminati is the oldest term commonly used to refer to the 13 family bloodlines (and their offshoots) that make up a major portion of this controlling elite (also known as the black nobility). The black nobility are wealthy European families that have ruled vast financial empires for the past fifteen hundred years. 'They are called the 'Black' nobility because of their constant use of dirty tricks, terrorism and unethical methods which they never hesitate to use against anyone who would dare to
stand in their way. These people are very closely allied to the "German Marshall Fund" which organizes and finances most of the work of the Club of Rome.
Most members of the Illuminati are also members in the highest ranks of numerous secretive and occult societies which in many cases extend straight back into the ancient world. The upper levels of the tightly compartmentalized (need-to-know-basis) Illuminati structural pyramid include planning committees and organizations that the public has little or no knowledge of. The upper levels of the Illuminati pyramid include secretive committees with names such as: the Council of 3, the Council of 5, the Council of 7, the Council of 9, the Council of 13, the Council of 33, the Grand Druid Council, the Committee of 300 (also called the "Olympians") and the Committee of 500 among others. In 1992, Dr John Coleman published Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300.
With laudable scholarship and meticulous research, Dr Coleman identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control. On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr Coleman accurately summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of 300 as follows:
"A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population. There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."
The image below shows that the power structure of the New World Order is based on an incredible
network of masonic groups and secret societies which encompasses banking and finance, politics,
education and the environment and religion.
The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations
involved in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people react
with disbelief and scepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned
(brainwashed) to react with scepticism by institutional and media influences that were created by the
Mother of All mind control organizations: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London.
Author and de-programmer Fritz Springmeier says that most people have built in "slides" that short
circuit the mind's critical examination process when it comes to certain sensitive topics. "Slides",
Springmeier reports, is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which dead ends a person's
thinking and terminates debate or examination of the topic at hand. For example, the mention of the
word "conspiracy" often solicits a slide response with many people. Springmeier has co-authored
three books on trauma-based programming which detail how the Illuminati employs highly tuned and
extremely sophisticated Mind Control (MC) training programs that begin the programming process
while the intended victim is still within the womb. Mind Control is a much greater problem than most
people realize.
What most Americans believe to be "Public Opinion" is in reality carefully crafted and scripted
propaganda designed to elicit a desired behavioral response from the public. Public opinion polls are
really taken with the intent of gauging the public's acceptance of the Illuminati's planned programs. A
strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that the programing is "taking", while a poor showing
tells the NWO manipulators that they have to recast or "tweak" the programming until the desired
response is achieved. While the thrust and content of the propaganda is decided at Tavistock,
implementation of the propaganda is executed in the United States by well over 200 'think tanks'
such as the Rand Corporation and the Brookings Institute which are overseen and directed by the top
NWO mind control organization in the United States, the Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo
Park, California.

4. A MASONIC BLUEPRINT TO LAUNCH THE WORLD ORDER THROUGH WAR
One of the problems facing bible prophecy today is modern surface level bible prophecy research
that does not properly distinguish the fact that the Zionism concept has a deep sinister and demonic
core to its true essence. Many bible prophecy evangelists such as John Hagee have done much to
popularize the belief that by standing for Israel and a Zionist state that this provides you with favor in
the eyes of God and fulfils the required obligation to support Israel as prophesied. Many end time
prophecy insights make reference to the special relationship between the United States, Britain and
Israel and the fact that there is an inherent spiritual obligation of the so called Christian nations to
support the Jewish people. Reference is given to the need to help the Jews rebuild their temple as
this is a significant requirement not only in the end time calendar but also because such a temple
would become a major icon within the Millennial reign of Christ on earth.
However the truth is that by a more in-depth and deeper understanding of global government
policies uncovers definitive proof of a Jewish Masonic elitist goal to establish dictatorial Illuministic
Communism and to enslave all of mankind under the thumb of a Jewish master race led by a world
messiah of Jewish ancestry who is to rule from Jerusalem. This is not an anti-semetic stance but
rather one that differentiates between Godly Jews from the line of Abraham and those Jews whose
apostasy has caused them to be an integral part of a major demonic plan.
The New World Order plan is historically known to have begun its implementation with Albert Pike in
his monumental Freemasonry teaching guide entitled, "Morals And Dogma of the Ancient And
Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry".113 Pike was the Grand Commander of North American
Freemasonry from 1859-1891 and was an extremely gifted intellectual.
• He was a certified genius
• He spoke 16 languages fluently
• He graduated from Harvard University
• He achieved rank of Brigadier General of Confederate Army in Civil War
• He was thoroughly familiar with the Jewish occult system known ad the Cabala
During his tenure, Pike caught a global vision of what Freemasonry could achieve, and so he turned
his immense intellect toward achieving this vision. Consequently, he received a demonic vision,
described below. On January 22, 1870, Pike and one of his international co-conspirators, Guiseppe
Mazzini, published the Plan which would establish the New World Order. This Plan was kept very
secret, only within Freemasonry circles since the time of its inception, known only to fellow occult
Illuminist conspirators.
The secret Pike plan to control the world foresaw the need for three world wars. Note the date of this
prediction: January 22, 1870. This date is 44 years before the beginning of World War I. Once you
understand the facts we are about to share with you and realize the length of time between this
prediction and the beginning of its fulfillment, you can understand how supernatural forces were
truly in command.
The Masonic plan to overthrow the Judeo-Christian-Islamic Old World Order, and establish the
Satanic New World Order foresaw the need for war. However, this war was not the type of warfare
the world had seen historically. This war was to be on a much larger scale than history had ever
recorded. This war was to be global, or world-wide.
The details of this Pike Plan {January 22, 1870} for three World Wars to establish the New World
Order is as follows: (As you are reading this demonic prophecy, remember the occult concept of
Thesis battling Antithesis to produce the new system, Synthesis. World Wars I & II were fought to
establish Antithesis, to set up the Cold War, that "controlled conflict or threat of conflict" that would
produce the new system, Synthesis).
I. The First World War was designed to enable the Czarist Government in Russia to be finally and
completely overthrown. The new Russian government was foreseen to be atheistic and militaristic.
Further, Pike specified that this new Russian Government was to be Communistic. Karl Marx had
published his Communist Manifesto in 1848, exactly 22 years before this occultic prophecy through
Albert Pike. Isn't it interesting that the occultic number 22 keeps popping up? The multiplier
numbers, 44 and 66 also keep appearing, as you will see in a few moments. History records that this
First World War did, indeed, occur just as listed, above. The Western powers in Europe, in
conjunction with the United States, financed Lenin's expedition into Russia, they financed his
government consistently, and we have financed Russian Communism at least once per decade since
then.
II. The Second World War was foreseen to originate between Great Britain and Germany. However,
one of the planned results of this war was to strengthen the new Communist Russian government, so
that it could weaken and destroy other governments and religions. History again records that the
Second World War did, indeed, accomplish this objective. The war started when Germany invaded
Poland, causing Great Britain to declare war on Germany. Very soon, the troika (3's) of powers were
set up to wage this war. The Black Magic occultists allied themselves when Germany linked with Italy
and Japan; the White Magic occultists allied themselves together as Great Britain linked with the
United States and Russia. Do not be deceived.
This war was fought between two New World Order forces, the "evil" alliance of the Axis Powers or
the "good" alliance of the Allied Powers; the war was between the Black Magic forces against the
White Magic forces. But, we shall return to this subject in more depth at a later time. Certainly, the
Pike vision of the Second World War building Russian Communism into a super power was fulfilled to
a startling degree. Historians have always been mystified as to how Churchill and Roosevelt could
have given away all of Eastern Europe to the Soviets, when the preponderance of power was clearly
against the Soviets. Clearly, when Roosevelt and Churchill ceded all of Eastern Europe to Russia, the
Communist Government of Russia, now known as the U.S.S.R. {Union of Soviet Socialist Republics)
completed its transition to a super power, exactly as Pike's vision had foretold. And, let us not forget
that the Second World War had given Russia capabilities it had not possessed before the War. Not
only did we build up the Russian military to a frightful degree, but we had also built entire factories
East of Moscow that gave Russia an instant manufacturing base. Even though Russia had paid dearly
in human lives during the War, they came out of the conflict a superpower. Thanks to Roosevelt,
Russia now had a kingdom to go along with its new military and industrial base.
III. The Third World War was foreseen to be between Judaism and Islam. This prophecy is incredible
in many ways, beginning with the understanding that this prophecy of a third world war occurred in
1870, a time when Israel did not exist as a nation, and when no one except Fundamentalist,
Bible-believing Christians believed it would ever exist again. The demonic 'guiding spirits' of
Freemasonry, and of the leaders of the New World Order Plan, are planning a final, definitive Third
World War, which will begin between Israel and her Arab neighbors and spread to the entire world.
Now, here is the most interesting aspect of this demonic plan; it fits with Scripture!! God foretold
Last Day's Judgment on the Arabs in several places, listed below!
In Obadiah, God foretells the destruction of the House of Esau, particularly the people of Edom, in
the Last Days. God is promising this deliverance for the way in which these Arabs treated His chosen
People. While severe judgment did fall upon the nation of Edom in 70 A.D., they were not wiped out
as a people, nor was the destruction at the hands of Israel, as Verse 18 foretells, nor was it the
fulfillment of the final days' judgment, which the Bible consistently labels the "Day Of The Lord"
{Verse 15}
Joel 2:18-3:21, God foretells tremendous judgment of all nations in the world, starting with the
Arabs, beginning when God "reverses the captivity" and "restores the fortunes" of Israel, a date we
know as May 14, 1948. Read this passage carefully, and you will see the hand of God foretelling
judgment swirling all around Israel after she is restored to her land. Joel 2:30-31 seem to foretell
nuclear war at this time.
While Israel will escape physical destruction by the miraculous power of God, she will be in so much
danger that God Himself will supernaturally protect her. In Daniel 12:1, we see that, in the time of the
End, Israel will be in such danger that "Michael shall arise to defend your [Daniel's] people [Israel]."
Therefore, we can place great emphasis and credibility in this demonic vision of the Third World War.
Out of the smoke and destruction of this War, Antichrist will stride triumphantly, to put an end to the
War, to finally give the embattled world "Peace and Safety". But, as 1 Thessalonians 5:1-4 foretells,
when people are saying this, the world will explode in destruction.
The current events in Israel, where she is giving up "land for peace" makes no sense any other way.
Israel's leaders, some of whom are former generals in the Army, have lent their support to this idiotic
plan. Militarily, this plan is a disaster, for it allows the Arabs a permanent home so deep within Israel
that the military might not be able to successfully defend Israel if the attack comes from within the
Palestinian State.
The Jewish Orthodox community is overwhelmingly of the opinion that this "Peace Plan" is a recipe
for war, not peace. They are right; that is the plan. Why, you ask, are so many Israeli leaders, who
should know better, creating and supporting this plan of giving the Palestinians a state, and giving up
the Golan Heights? There are three reasons:
1. They are Humanists, and therefore, are capable of being deceived by Satan
2. They have been given "concrete" assurances by the Western Powers that their security will be
"guaranteed" if they agree to this plan.
3. Many of them are Freemasons and follow the Talmud and Jewish Cabala
Isaiah alludes to these covenants by the leaders of Israel as covenants with death. In Isaiah 28:18
“And your covenant with death shall be disannulled., and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the
overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.”

5. CONTROL OF JERUSALEM AND KING SOLOMONS TEMPLE
In the classic treatise of the Masons, “Morals and Dogma”, authored by the late Sovereign Grand
Commander of the Scottish Rite, Albert Pike, 113 we discover the revelation that the Jewish cabala is
the very basis of Masonic practice and ritual and that the cabalistic "Theology of the Sephiroth" is at
the root of all Masonic knowledge. This, admits Pike, is "high magic," the "Sacerdotal Art," and the
"Royal Art.  In “Morals and Dogma” Albert Pike also details a specific Masonic agenda to blow up and to utterly
destroy and remove from the Temple mount both the Islamic Mosque of Omar and the Goldendomed
structure known as the "Dome of the Rock" despised by Orthodox Jewish rabbis and the secularist Masonic Illuminists alike. It is planned that these two Islamic religious edifices will be brought down by Israeli defense forces possibly by missiles, sapper bombs, laser bursts, or other means. Naturally, this atrocity will be planned in the chaotic midst of an ongoing war, and the disaster will be scandalously blamed on the Arabs. It will be said that an errant Arab missile or bomb is responsible. The end goal is to clear the Dome of the Rock and make space for the establishment of Solomon’s Temple. "Of all the objects which constitute the Masonic science of symbolism, the most important, the most cherished, by the Mason, and by far the most significant, is the Temple of Jerusalem. The spiritualizing of the Temple is the first, the most prominent and the most pervading, of all symbols of Freemasonry ... Take from Freemasonry its dependence on the Temple; leave out of its ritual all references to that sacred edifice, and to the legends and traditions connected with it,
and the system itself would at once decay and die ... "
Therefore, the first understanding to grasp is that Freemasonry is absolutely, completely, 100%
devoted to the Solomon Temple, without which the entire structure and foundation of Freemasonry
would die! Thus does Masonry stand in stark contrast to genuine, Biblical Christianity. In other words,
Freemasonry is rooted at its deepest foundation to the First Covenant of the Old Testament, while
Biblical Christianity is rooted to the Second Covenant of Jesus Christ as delineated in the New
Testament. In the Masonic Bible, the author of the Foreword sheds some further light upon the
importance of Solomon's Temple to Freemasonry. "The traditions and romance of King Solomon's Temple are of great interest to everyone who reads the Bible. They are of transcendent importance to Masons. The Temple is the outstanding symbol in Masonry, and the legendary story of the building of the Temple is the fundamental basis of the Masonic rule and guide for conduct in life ... The cream of Masonic historical and philosophical writing has been drawn upon for his description of the Temple and its relation to Masonic ritual."
Then shall come a prophesied Masonic Temple of All Religions to be built on the very spot from where the debris and ashes of the Moslem structures will be bulldozed off and cleared. Through its golden portals shall pass the New Zionist Messiah, King of Planet Earth. Before its evil altar he shall announce to all the world, via television, that their Universal Savior has finally come, a man knowledgeable of "the Holy Kabbalah, the exclusive heritage of the people of Israel.”
The pretext for the First Crusade—recovery of the Temple treasures and sacred sites—concealed the real motive of the Merovingians, which was to rebuild the ancient Temple of Solomon. In the Chapter
“Knight Kadosh” of Morals and Dogma, Albert Pike wrote of the Crusader Knights of the Temple: "In 1118, nine Knights Crusaders in the East, among whom were Geoffroi de Saint-Omer and Hugues de Payens, consecrated themselves to religion, and took an oath between the hands of the Patriarch of Constantinople, a See always secretly or openly hostile to that of Rome from the time of Photius. The avowed objective of the Templars was to protect the Christians who came to visit the Holy Places: their secret object was the re-building of the Temple of Solomon on the model prophesied by Ezekiel.”
“This re-building, formally predicted by the Judaizing Mystics of the earlier ages, had become the secret dream of the Patriarchs of the Orient. The Temple of Solomon, re-built and consecrated to the Catholic worship would become, in effect, the Metropolis of the Universe; the East would prevail over the West, and the Patriarchs of Constantinople would possess themselves of the Papal power.”  “The Templars, or Poor Fellow-Soldiery of the Holy House of the Temple intended to be rebuilt, took as their models, in the Bible, the Warrior-Masons of Zorobabel, who worked, holding the sword in one hand and the trowel in the other.
Therefore it was that the Sword and the Trowell were the insignia of the Templars, who subsequently, as will be seen, concealed themselves under the name of Brethren Masons. [This name, Freres Macons in the French, adopted by way of secret reference to the Builders of the Second Temple, was corrupted in English into Free-Masons, as Pythagore de Crotone was into Peter Gower of Groton in England. Khairum or Khur-um, (a name mis-rendered into Hiram) from an artificer in brass and other metals, became the Chief Builder of the Haikal Kadosh, the Holy House, of the Temple,... and the words Bonai and Banaim yet appear in the Masonic Degrees, meaning Builder and Builders.)”
"The trowel of the Templars is quadruple, and the triangular plates of it are arranged in the form of a cross, making the Kabalistic pantacle known by the name of the Cross of the East. The Knight of the East, and the Knight of the East and West, have in their titles secret allusions of whom they were at first the successors." 113
The rise of Masons to political power in Israel dates back to 1948 and to Israel's founding as a modern-day nation. David Ben-Gurion, its first Prime Minister, was both a Mason and an avowed Marxist-Leninist and Communist. Since that time, every single Prime Minister has been a high-level Mason, including Golda Meier, who was a member of the women's organization, the Co-Masons. In The Jerusalem Post (November 1994) was an advertisement placed by "The Grand Lodge of the State of Israel." The display ad was addressed "To the Masons of Peace," and listed: "The Honorable Yitzak Rabin, Prime Minister of Israel," "His Majesty, King Hussein of Jordan," and "The Honorable Bill Clinton, President of the United States."
The ad closed with these fascinating words "With warm fraternal congratulations on the signing of the peace agreement between Israel and
Jordan." Signed - Ephraim Fuchs, President of the Israel Order of Masons."
In 1993 in Jerusalem, a celebration of political Masons was held. According to the respected Italian newspaper La Republica (October 1993), in an article entitled, "Israel: There is a Pact Between
Politicians and Masons," the ceremony was attended by the Mayor of Jerusalem, Teddy Kollek, as well as by the Ashkenazi Chief Rabbi, Israel Meier Lau. Kollek told the gathered Masons, "You do a great honor to Jerusalem.” This is natural, considering that King Solomon was the great builder of the temple, which is at the roots of the Masonic idea." At that same ceremony, sponsored by the "Grand Lodge of the State of Israel," Rabbi Lau stated that, "The principles of Freemasonry are all contained in the Book of Books of the Jewish people." Former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has publicly stated (see the Israeli publication Shishi, Spring 1994) that he was initiated into the Masonic Lodge while in the United States. The La Republica newspaper stated that Prime Minister Yitzak Rabin was active in Masonry and estimated there are 4,000 Israeli Freemasons, divided into 76 lodges. Most Israeli judges and religious figures are Masons. Rothschild-supported Hebrew University in Israel has erected an Egyptian obelisk, symbol of Freemasonry, in its courtyard, and inside the new Israeli Supreme Court building is a law library architecturally designed in the shape of an Egyptian pyramid.
Once you understand that Middle Eastern events are being driven by this fervent Masonic desire to rebuild Solomon's Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, then you will be able to make sense of what is occurring over there today. To finally realize this dream, control of Jerusalem generally, and of the Temple Mount, especially, must pass from Israeli control; but it must not pass to Arab control.
Rather, control of Jerusalem must pass to the Illuminized International Community. Once you understand this it then changes your whole perception on understanding who the antichrist is. The Masonic "preoccupation" with Jerusalem is pulling all the nations of the world together against Jerusalem. Literally, out of the smoke, devastation, and terror of the planned World War III, The apostate Christ shall come striding, just as Peter Lemesurier indicated in his book, "The Armageddon Script".116 Islam and Arabs need to understand that they are targeted for extinction, as their strongly monotheistic religion is not compatible with the coming world government philosophy of governance.
In the masonic hallmark "Morals and Dogma", Grandmaster Free Mason of the Scottish Rite, Albert Pike defines the New World Order as emerging after an apocalyptic World War III which will see a
major clash between the forces of Islam and the Zionist West. It is likely that such a war will be triggered or influenced by an attempt whether successful or unsuccessful to remove the Muslim
Dome of the Rock and the Al Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. It has long been known that the Jesuit Order has been planning to accomplish a feat through a
number of secret covert masonic zionist intelligence agencies such as Mossad. The Jesuit Order is closely integrated with the masonic lodges and both are fully aware that Solomon's Temple could
never be built without significant hostility from the Muslim world should the Dome of the Rock still exist whilst trying to build the Jewish third temple only a matter of a few hundred yards away.
Unfortunately many bible prophecy scholars have showed tremendous excitement at seeing any evidence of the rebuilding of the Jewish Temple because this is a significant prophetical requirement
to fulfil Daniel 9:27 which indicates that the Levitical priesthood and temple sacrifices will commence.
However many do not realise that there is a parallel objective here and neither do they distinguish between "Torah" following Jews and "Apostate Jews" who follow the Kabbala, Babylonian Talmud
and who fulfil Isaiah 28:18. The rebuilding of Solomon’s Temple ties into the several references that the Bible makes to a future event called the "abomination of desolation" in which it is likely that the conservative Jews (who follow the Torah) will have their role stripped as the masonic apostate Jews and the global elite (who follow the Talmud) will seize full control in which their own world leader dictator and false messiah will be revealed. "... In all the rich symbolism of Ancient Craft Masonry two symbols, or symbolic themes, predominate. One is the search for light; the other is the labor of building. The source of light is the Holy Bible, and the grand representation of the builder's art is King Solomon's Temple .... It was natural that imaginative stone Masons, long before the development of anything like our modern fraternity, should have felt a kinship with the great builders of all ages. It was natural also that they should have acknowledge a peculiar attraction for the most famous and glorious of all building enterprises, King Solomon's Temple and Citadel. Interest and attraction for the wonderful structure on Mt. Moriah have increased rather than diminished ... until today the Temple of Solomon is the spiritual home of every Mason." [Masonic Holy Bible, Temple Illustrated Edition, A.J. Holman Co., 1968, p. 11-14]Once you understand that Middle Eastern events are being driven by this fervent Masonic desire to rebuild Solomon's Temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem, then you will be able to make sense of what is occurring over there today. To finally realize this dream, control of Jerusalem generally, and
of the Temple Mount, especially, must pass from Israeli control; but it must not pass to Arab control. Rather, control of Jerusalem must pass to the Illuminized International Community under the control
of the black nobility families who control the world.


Every one is dancing at

 72Point.com

getting ready for the 2009 New Year
 
after a successful 2008 year as

the leading PR company in the United Kingdom


Click here to enquire about any of our Services
Or simply call us on 0117 9066 555.



Press Coverage

Want to achieve national or regional press coverage for your product or brand?

72 Point achieves more press coverage than any other PR agency and we have packages to suit both large and small companies.

For as little as £1,500, 72 Point will:

  • Draft a full, branded press release for you - incorporating all your KEY PR messages
  • Use our unrivalled relationship with the national and regional press to actively sell in your story
  • Distribute your release to all the national and key regional press via our exclusive in-house newswire (established 40 years)
  • Send you full cuts when your brand appears in the press

We can help achieve wide-spread awareness of your brand.

Fill in our contact form for further information.

0845 6384200

http://www.72point.com/


72 Point - Clients

Over the years, 72 Point has worked with literally hundreds of clients, working on sustained awareness of huge corporate household names, through to new business start-ups wanting to break into already competitive markets.

We have also worked with PR Agencies of all sizes to support them with their own clients' activity - either as part of a larger campaign or sometimes simply to help out on a difficult brief or previously unsuccessful project.


 

72Pooint.com - Client List

Charity

 

 

  • Meningitis Trust
  • Texas Red
  • Friends of the Earth
  • Rethink Rubbish
  • Unite Group
  • Institute of Cancer Research



 

8. Extracts of INL News Report on New World Order - Barrack Obama- 2008 BANKING COLLAPSE ESCALATES WORLD GOVERNMENT FORMATION

UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA - EMERGENCE OF REGIONAL CURRENCIES - A “NEW WORLD ORDER” IN BANKING

 

"International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic.” an adviser to French President Nicolas Sarkozy Rachman

 

In February of 2009, the Times Online reported that a  “New world order in banking [is] necessary,” and that,  “It is increasingly evident that the world needs a new banking system and  that it should not bear much resemblance to the one that has failed so spectacularly.”  But of course, the ones that are shaping this new banking system  are the champions of the previous banking system.  The solutions that will follow are simply the extensions of the current system,  only sped up through them necessity posed by the current crisis.

 

In November of 2008, The National, a prominent United Arab Emirate newspaper, reported on Baron David de Rothschild accompanying Prime Minister Gordon Brown on a visit to the Middle East, although not as a “part of the official party” accompanying Brown. Following an interview with the Baron, it was reported that, “Rothschild shares most people’s view that there is a new world order. In his opinion, banks will deleverage and there will be a new form of global governance.”

 

In April of 2009, Robert Zoellick, President of the World Bank, said that, “If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernizing multilateralism to empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.”  David Rothkopf, a scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, former Deputy Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade in the Clinton administration, and former managing director of Kissinger and Associates, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, recently wrote a book titled, Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They are Making, of which he is certainly a member. When discussing the role and agenda of the global “superclass”, he states that, “In a world of global movements and threats that don’t present their passports at national borders, it is no longer possible for a nation-state acting alone to fulfill its portion of the social contract.” He writes that, “even the international organizations and alliances we have today, flawed as they are, would have seemed impossible until recently, notably the success of the European Union – a unitary democratic state the size of India. The evolution and achievements of such entities against all odds suggest not isolated instances but an overall trend in the direction of what Tennyson called “the Parliament of Man,” or ‘universal law’.”  He states that he is “optimistic that progress will continue to be made,” but it will be difficult, because it “undercuts many national and local power structures and cultural concepts that have foundations deep in the bedrock of human civilization, namely the notion of sovereignty.”

He quoted an adviser to French President Nicolas Sarkozy as saying, “Global governance is just a euphemism for global government,” and that the “core of the international financial crisis is that we have global financial markets and no global rule of law.” However, Rachman states that any push towards a global government “will be a painful, slow process.” He then states that a key problem in this push can be explained with an example from the EU, which “has suffered a series of humiliating defeats in referendums, when plans for “ever closer union” have been referred to the voters. In general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters.

 

"International governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic.” an adviser to French President Nicolas Sarkozy Rachman

 

A NEW BRETTON-WOODS

In October of 2008, Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of the UK, said that we “must have a new Bretton Woods - building a new international financial architecture for the years ahead.” He continued in saying that, “we must now reform the international financial system around the agreed principles of  transparency, integrity, responsibility, good housekeeping and co-operation across borders.” An article in the Telegraph reported that Gordon Brown would want “to see the IMF reformed to become a ‘global central bank’ closely monitoring the international economy and financial system.” 252 On October 17, 2008, Prime Minister Gordon Brown wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post in which he said, “This week, European leaders came together to propose the guiding principles that we believe should underpin this new Bretton Woods: transparency, sound banking, responsibility, integrity and global governance. We agreed that urgent decisions implementing these principles should be made to root out the irresponsible and often undisclosed lending at the heart of our problems. To do this, we need cross-border supervision of financial institutions; shared global standards for accounting and regulation; a more responsible approach to executive remuneration that rewards hard work, effort and enterprise but not irresponsible risk-taking; and the renewal of our international institutions to make them effective early-warning systems for the world economy.”

 

In early October 2008, it was reported that, “as the world's central bankers gather this week in Washington DC for an IMF-World Bank conference to discuss the crisis, the big question they face is whether it is time to establish a global economic "policeman" to ensure the crash of 2008 can never be repeated.” Further, “any organization with the power to police the global economy would have to include representatives of every major country – a United Nations of economic regulation.” A former governor of the Bank of England suggested that, “the answer might already be staring us in the face, in the form of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS),” however, “The problem is that it has no teeth. The IMF tends to couch its warnings about economic problems in very diplomatic language, but the BIS is more independent and much better placed to deal with this if it is given the power to do so.”

UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA A GLOBAL CURRENCY The Phoenix

In 1988, The Economist ran an article titled, Get Ready for the Phoenix, in which they wrote, “THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let's say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today's national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the late twentieth century.” The article stated that, “The market crash [of 1987] taught [governments] that the pretence of policy cooperation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (ie, until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.” Amazingly the article states that, “Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice. This points to a muddled sequence of emergency followed by patch-up followed by emergency, stretching out far beyond 2018-except for two things. As time passes, the damage caused by currency instability is gradually going to mount; and the very trends that will make it mount are making the utopia of monetary union feasible.” Further, the article stated that, “The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate-and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate-would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit.” The author admits that, “This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.” The article concludes in stating that, “The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.” The last sentence states, “Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.”

A “NEW WORLD ORDER” IN BANKING

In March of 2008, following the collapse of Bear Stearns, Reuters reported on a document released by research firm CreditSights, which said that, “Financial firms face a ‘new world order’,” and that, “More industry consolidation and acquisitions may follow after JPMorgan Chase & Co.” Further, “In the event of future consolidation, potential acquirers identified by CreditSights include JPMorganChase, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America.” In June of 2008, before he was Treasury Secretary in the Obama administration, Timothy Geithner, as head of the New York Federal Reserve, wrote an article for the Financial Times following his attendance at the 2008 Bilderberg conference, in which he wrote that, “Banks and investment banks whose health is crucial to the global financial system should operate under a unified regulatory framework,” and he said that, “the US Federal Reserve should play a "central role" in the new regulatory framework, working closely with supervisors in the US and around the world.” In November of 2008, The National, a prominent United Arab Emirate newspaper, reported on Baron David de Rothschild accompanying Prime Minister Gordon Brown on a visit to the Middle East, although not as a “part of the official party” accompanying Brown. Following an interview with the Baron, it was reported that, “Rothschild shares most people’s view that there is a new world order. In his opinion, banks will deleverage and there will be a new form of global governance.”  In February of 2009, the Times Online reported that a “New world order in banking [is] necessary,” and that, “It is increasingly evident that the world needs a new banking system and that it should not bear much resemblance to the one that has failed so spectacularly.” 306 But of course, the ones that are shaping this new banking system are the champions of the previous banking system. The solutions that will follow are simply the extensions of the current system, only sped up through the necessity posed by the current crisis.

AN EMERGING GLOBAL GOVERNMENT

A recent article in the Financial Post stated that, “The danger in the present course is that if the world moves to a “super sovereign” reserve currency engineered by experts, such as the “UN Commission of Experts” led by Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, we would give up the possibility of a spontaneous money order and financial harmony for a centrally planned order and the politicization of money. Such a regime change would endanger not only the future value of money but, more importantly, our freedom and prosperity.” 307 Further, “An uncomfortable characteristic of the new world order may well turn out to be that global income gaps will widen because the rising powers, such as China, India and Brazil, regard those below them on the ladder as potential rivals.” The author further states that, “The new world order thus won't necessarily be any better than the old one,” and that, “What is certain, though, is that global affairs are going to be considerably different from now on.”  In April of 2009, Robert Zoellick, President of the World Bank, said that, “If leaders are serious about creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernizing multilateralism to empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.”  David Rothkopf, a scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, former Deputy Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade in the Clinton administration, and former managing director of Kissinger and Associates, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations, recently wrote a book titled, Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They are Making, of which he is certainly a member. When discussing the role and agenda of the global “superclass”, he states that, “In a world of global movements and threats that don’t present their passports at national borders, it is no longer possible for a nation-state acting alone to fulfill its portion of the social contract.” He writes that, “even the international organizations and alliances we have today, flawed as they are, would have seemed impossible until recently, notably the success of the European Union – a unitary democratic state the size of India. The evolution and achievements of such entities against all odds suggest not isolated instances but an overall trend in the direction of what Tennyson called “the Parliament of Man,” or ‘universal law’.” He states that he is “optimistic that progress will continue to be made,” but it will be difficult, because it “undercuts many national and local power structures and cultural concepts that have foundations deep in the bedrock of human civilization, namely the notion of sovereignty.”

 

Following the 2009 G20 summit, plans were announced for implementing the creation of a new global currency to replace the US dollar’s role as the world reserve currency. Point 19 of the communiqué released by the G20 at the end of the Summit stated, “We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity.” SDRs, or Special Drawing Rights, are “a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund.” As the Telegraph reported, “the G20 leaders have activated the IMF's power to create money and begin global "quantitative easing". In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.” 251 The article continued in stating that, “There is now a world currency in waiting. In time, SDRs are likely to evolve into a parking place for the foreign holdings of central banks, led by the People's Bank of China.” Further, “The creation of a Financial Stability Board looks like the first step towards a global financial regulator,” or, in other words, a global central bank. It is important to take a closer look at these “solutions” being proposed and implemented in the midst of the current global financial crisis. These are not new suggestions, as they have been in the plans of the global elite for a long time. However, in the midst of the current crisis, the elite have fasttracked their agenda of forging a New World Order in finance. It is important to address the background to these proposed and imposed “solutions” and what effects they will have on the International Monetary System (IMS) and the global political economy as a whole.

A NEW BRETTON-WOODS

In October of 2008, Gordon Brown, Prime Minister of the UK, said that we “must have a new Bretton Woods - building a new international financial architecture for the years ahead.” He continued in saying that, “we must now reform the international financial system around the agreed principles of transparency, integrity, responsibility, good housekeeping and co-operation across borders.” An article in the Telegraph reported that Gordon Brown would want “to see the IMF reformed to become a ‘global central bank’ closely monitoring the international economy and financial system.” 252 On October 17, 2008, Prime Minister Gordon Brown wrote an op-ed in the Washington Post in which he said, “This week, European leaders came together to propose the guiding principles that we believe should underpin this new Bretton Woods: transparency, sound banking, responsibility, integrity and global governance. We agreed that urgent decisions implementing these principles should be made to root out the irresponsible and often undisclosed lending at the heart of our problems. To do this, we need cross-border supervision of financial institutions; shared global standards for accounting and regulation; a more responsible approach to executive remuneration that rewards hard work, effort and enterprise but not irresponsible risk-taking; and the renewal of our international institutions to make them effective early-warning systems for the world economy.”

In early October 2008, it was reported that, “as the world's central bankers gather this week in Washington DC for an IMF-World Bank conference to discuss the crisis, the big question they face is whether it is time to establish a global economic "policeman" to ensure the crash of 2008 can never be repeated.” Further, “any organization with the power to police the global economy would have to include representatives of every major country – a United Nations of economic regulation.” A former governor of the Bank of England suggested that, “the answer might already be staring us in the face, in the form of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS),” however, “The problem is that it has no teeth. The IMF tends to couch its warnings about economic problems in very diplomatic language, but the BIS is more independent and much better placed to deal with this if it is given the power to do so.”  On January 1, 1999, the European Union established the Euro as its regional currency. The Euro has grown in prominence over the past several years. However, it is not to be the only regional currency in the world. There are moves and calls for other regional currencies throughout the world. In 2007, Foreign Affairs, the journal of the Council on Foreign Relations, ran an article titled, The End of National Currency, in which it began by discussing the volatility of international currency markets, and that very few “real” solutions have been proposed to address successive currency crises. The author poses the question, “will restoring lost sovereignty to governments put an end to financial instability?” He answers by stating that, “This is a dangerous misdiagnosis,” and that, “The right course is not to return to a mythical past of monetary sovereignty, with governments controlling local interest and exchange rates in blissful ignorance of the rest of the world. Governments must let go of the fatal notion that nationhood requires them to make and control the money used in their territory. National currencies and global markets simply do not mix; together they make a deadly brew of currency crises and geopolitical tension and create ready pretexts for damaging protectionism. In order to globalize safely, countries should abandon monetary nationalism and abolish unwanted currencies, the source of much of today's instability.”

The author explains that, “Monetary nationalism is simply incompatible with globalization. It has always been, even if this has only become apparent since the 1970s, when all the world's governments rendered their currencies intrinsically worthless.” The author states that, “Since  economic development outside the process of globalization is no longer possible, countries should abandon monetary nationalism. Governments should replace national currencies with the dollar or the euro or, in the case of Asia, collaborate to produce a new multinational currency over a comparably large and economically diversified area.” Essentially, according to the author, the solution lies in regional currencies. In October of 2008, “European Central Bank council member Ewald Nowotny said a ``tri-polar'' global currency system is developing between Asia, Europe and the U.S. and that he's skeptical the U.S. dollar's centrality can be revived.”

The Union of South American Nations

The Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) was established on May 23, 2008, with the headquarters to be in Ecuador, the South American Parliament to be in Bolivia, and the Bank of the South to be in Venezuela. As the BBC reported, “The leaders of 12 South American nations have formed a regional body aimed at boosting economic and political integration in the region,” and that, “The Unasur members are Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay and Venezuela.”  The week following the announcement of the Union, it was reported that, “Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said Monday that South American nations will seek a common currency as part of the region's integration efforts following the creation of the Union of South American Nations.” He was quoted as saying, “We are proceeding so as, in the future, we have a common central bank and a common currency.”

The Gulf Cooperation Council and a Regional Currency

In 2005, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), a regional trade bloc among Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), announced the goal of creating a single common currency by 2010. It was reported that, “An economically united and efficient GCC is clearly a more interesting proposition for larger companies than each individual economy, especially given the impediments to trade evident within the region. This is why trade relations within the GCC have been a core focus of late.” Further, “The natural extension of this trend for increased integration is to introduce a common currency in order to further facilitate trade between the different countries.” It was announced that, “the region's central bankers had agreed to pursue monetary union in a similar fashion to the rules used in Europe.”  In June of 2008, it was reported that, “Gulf Arab central bankers agreed to create the nucleus of a joint central bank next year in a major step forward for monetary union but signaled that a new common currency would not be in circulation by an agreed 2010 target.” 260 In 2002, it was announced that the “Gulf states say they are seeking advice from the European Central Bank on their monetary union programme.” In February of 2008, Oman announced that it would not be joining the monetary union. In November of 2008, it was announced that the “Final monetary union draft says Gulf central bank will be independent from governments of member states.”

In March of 2009, it was reported that, “The GCC should not rush into forming a single currency as member states need to work out the framework for a regional central bank, Saudi Arabia's Central Bank Governor Muhammad Al Jasser.” Jasser was further quoted as saying, “It took the European Union 45 years to put together a single currency. We should not rush.” In 2008, with the global financial crisis, new problems were posed for the GCC initiative, as “Pressure mounted last year on the GCC members to drop their currency pegs as inflation accelerated above 10 per cent in five of the six countries. All of the member states except Kuwait peg their currencies to the dollar and tend to follow the US Federal Reserve when setting interest rates.”

An Asian Monetary Union

In 1997, the Brookings Institution, a prominent American think tank, discussed the possibilities of an East Asian Monetary Union, stating that, “the question for the 21st century is whether analogous monetary blocs will form in East Asia (and, for that matter, in the Western Hemisphere). With the dollar, the yen, and the single European currency floating against one another, other small open economies will be tempted to link up to one of the three.” However, “the linkage will be possible only if accompanied by radical changes in institutional arrangements like those contemplated by the

European Union. The spread of capital mobility and political democratization will make it prohibitively difficult to peg exchange rates unilaterally. Pegging will require international cooperation, and effective cooperation will require measures akin to monetary unification.” 263 In 2001, Asia Times Online wrote an article discussing a speech given by economist Robert A. Mundell at Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University, at which he stated that, “[t]he "Asean plus three" (the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations plus China, Japan, and Korea) ‘should look to the European Union as a model for closer integration of monetary policy, trade and eventually, currency integration’.”

On May 6, 2005, the website of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) announced that, “China, Japan, South Korea and the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) have agreed to expand their network of bilateral currency swaps into what could become a virtual Asian Monetary Fund,” and that, “[f]inance officials of the 13 nations, who met in the sidelines of the Asian Development Bank (ADB) annual conference in Istanbul, appeared determined to turn their various bilateral agreements into some sort of multilateral accord, although none of the officials would directly call it an Asian Monetary Fund.”  In August of 2005, the San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank published a report on the prospects of an East Asian Monetary Union, stating that East Asia satisfies the criteria for joining a monetary union, however, it states that compared to the European initiative, “The implication is that achieving any monetary arrangement, including a common currency, is much more difficult in East Asia.” It further states that, “In Europe, a monetary union was achievable primarily because it was part of the larger process of political integration,” however, “There is no apparent desire for political integration in East Asia, partly because of the great differences among those countries in terms of political systems, culture, and shared history. As a result of their own particular histories, East Asian countries remain particularly jealous of their sovereignty.” Another major problem, as presented by the San Francisco Fed, is that, “East Asian governments appear much more suspicious of strong supranational institutions,” and thus, “in East Asia, sovereignty concerns have left governments reluctant to delegate significant authority to supranational bodies, at least so far.” It explains that as opposed to the steps taken to create a monetary union in Europe, “no broad free trade agreements have been achieved among the largest countries in the region, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and China.” Another problem is that, “East Asia does not appear to have an obvious candidate for an internal anchor currency for a cooperative exchange rate arrangement. Most successful new currencies have been started on the back of an existing currency, establishing confidence in its convertibility, thus linking the old with the new.”

The report concludes that, “exchange rate stabilization and monetary integration are unlikely in the near term. Nevertheless, East Asia is integrating through trade, even without an emphasis on formal trade liberalization agreements,” and that, “there is evidence of growing financial cooperation in the region, including the development of regional arrangements for providing liquidity during crises through bilateral foreign exchange swaps, regional economic surveillance discussions, and the development of regional bond markets.” Ultimately, “East Asia might also proceed along the same path [as Europe], first with loose agreements to stabilize currencies, followed later by tighter agreements, and culminating ultimately in adoption of a common anchor—and, after that, maybe an East Asia dollar.”  In 2007, it was reported that, “Asia may need to establish its own monetary fund if it is to cope with future financial shocks similar to that which rocked the region 10 years ago,” and that, “Further Asian financial integration is the best antidote for Asian future financial crises.”

In September of 2007, Forbes reported that, “An East Asian monetary union anchored by Japan is feasible but the region lacks the political will to do it, the Asian Development Bank said.” Pradumna Rana, an Asian Development Bank (ADB) economist, said that, “it appears feasible to establish a currency union in East Asia -- particularly among Indonesia, Japan, (South) Korea, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand,” and that, “The economic potential for monetary integration in Asia is strong, even though the political underpinnings of such an accord are not yet in place.” Further, “the real integration at the trade levels 'will actually reinforce the economic case for monetary union in Asia, in a similar way that real-sector integration did so in Europe,” and ultimately, “the road to an Asian monetary union could proceed on a 'multi-track, multi-speed' basis with a seamless Asian free trade area the goal on the trade side.” 268 In April of 2008, it was reported that, “ASEAN bank deputy governors and financial deputy ministers have met in Vietnam's central Da Nang city, discussing issues on the financial and monetary integration and cooperation in the region.”

African Monetary Union

Currently, Africa has several different monetary union initiatives, as well as some existing monetary unions within the continent. One initiative is the “monetary union project of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS),” which is a “regional group of 15 countries in West Africa.” Among the members are those of an already-existing monetary union in the region, the West African Economic and Monetary Union (WAEMU). The ECOWAS consists of Benin, Burkina Faso, Cote d’Ivoire, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo, Cape Verde, Liberia, Ghana, Gambia, and Nigeria.  The African Union was founded in 2002, and is an intergovernmental organization consisting of 53 African states. In 2003, the Brookings Institution produced a paper on African economic integration.In it, the authors started by stating that, “Africa, like other regions of the world, is fixing its sights on creating a common currency. Already, there are projects for regional monetary unions, and them bidding process for an eventual African central bank is about to begin.” It states that, “A common currency was also an objective of the Organization for African Unity and the African Economic Community, the predecessors of the AU,” and further, that, “The 1991 Abuja Treaty establishing the African Economic Community outlines six stages for achieving a single monetary zone for Africa that were set to be completed by approximately 2028. In the early stages, regional cooperation and integration within Africa would be strengthened, and this could involve regional monetary unions.

The final stage involves the establishment of the African Central Bank (ACB) and creation of a single African currency and an African Economic and Monetary Union.” The paper further states that the African Central Bank (ACB) “would not be created until around 2020, [but] the bidding process for its location is likely to begin soon,” however, “there are plans for creating various regional monetary unions, which would presumably form building blocks for the single African central bank and currency.”  In August of 2008, “Governors of African Central Banks convened in Kigali Serena Hotel to discuss issues concerning the creation of three African Union (AU) financial institutions,” following “the AU resolution to form the African Monetary Fund (AMF), African Central Bank (ACB) and the African Investment Bank (AIB).” The central bank governors “agreed that when established, the ACB would solely issue and manage Africa's single currency and monetary authority of the continent's economy.”

On March 2, 2009, it was reported that, “The African Union will sign a memorandum of understanding this month with Nigeria on the establishment of a continental central bank,” and that, “The institution will be based in the Nigerian capital, Abuja, African Union Commissioner for Economic Affairs Maxwell Mkwezalamba told reporters.” Further, “As an intermediate step to the creation of the bank, the pan- African body will establish an African Monetary Institute within the next three years, he said at a meeting of African economists in the city,” and he was quoted as saying, “We have agreed to work with the Association of African Central Bank Governors to set up a joint technical committee to look into the preparation of a joint strategy.” The website for the Kenyan Ministry of Foreign Affairs reported that, “The African Union Commissioner for Economic Affairs Dr. Maxwell Mkwezalamba has expressed optimism for the adoption of a common currency for Africa,” and that the main theme discussed at the AU Commission meeting in Kenya was, “Towards the Creation of a Single African Currency: Review of the Creation of a Single African Currency: Which optimal Approach to be adopted to accelerate the creation of the unique continental currency.”

A North American Monetary Union and the Amero

In 1999, the Fraser Institute, a prominent and highly influential Canadian think tank, published a report written by Economics professor and former MP, Herbert Grubel, called, The Case for the Amero: The Economics and Politics of a North American Monetary Union. He wrote that, “The plan for a North American Monetary Union presented in this study is designed to include Canada, the United States, and Mexico,” and a “North American Central Bank, like the European Central Bank, will  have a constitution making it responsible only for the maintenance of price stability and not for full employment.” He opined that, “sovereignty is not infinitely valuable. The merit of giving up some aspects of sovereignty should be determined by the gains brought by such a sacrifice,” and that, “It is important to note that in practice Canada has given up its economic sovereignty in many areas, the most important of which involve the World Trade Organization (formerly the GATT), the North American Free Trade Agreement,” as well as the International Monetary Fund and World Bank.  Also in 1999, the C.D. Howe Institute, another of Canada’s most prominent think tanks, produced a report titled, From Fixing to Monetary Union: Options for North American Currency Integration. In

this document, it was written that, “The easiest way to broach the notion of a NAMU [North

American Monetary Union] is to view it as the North American equivalent of the European Monetary

Union (EMU) and, by extension, the euro.” 277 It further stated that the fact that “a NAMU would

mean the end of sovereignty in Canadian monetary policy is clear. Most obviously, it would mean

abandoning a made-in-Canada inflation rate for a US or NAMU inflation rate.”

In May of 2007, Canada’s then Governor of the Central Bank of Canada, David Dodge, said that,

“North America could one day embrace a euro-style single currency,” and that, “Some proponents

have dubbed the single North American currency the ‘amero’.” Answering questions following his

speech, Dodge said that, “a single currency was ‘possible’.

In November of 2007, one of Canada’s richest billionaires, Stephen Jarislowsky, also a member of the

board of the C.D. Howe Institute, told a Canadian Parliamentary committee that, “Canada should replace its dollar with a North American currency, or peg it to the U.S. greenback, to avoid the exchange rate shifts the loonie has experienced,” and that, “I think we have to really seriously start thinking of the model of a continental currency just like Europe.” Former Mexican President Vicente Fox, while appearing on Larry King Live in 2007, was asked a question regarding the possibility of a common currency for Latin America, to which he responded by saying, “Long term, very long term. What we propose together, President Bush and myself, it's ALCA, which is a trade union for all of the Americas. And everything was running fluently until Hugo Chavez came. He decided to isolate himself. He decided to combat the idea and destroy the idea.” Larry King then asked, “It's going to be like the euro dollar, you mean?” to which Fox responded, “Well, that would be long, long term. I think the processes to go, first step into is trading agreement. And then further on, a new vision, like we are trying to do with NAFTA.”

In January of 2008, Herbert Grubel, the author who coined the term “amero” for the Fraser Institute report, wrote an article for the Financial Post, in which he recommends fixing the Canadian loonie to the US dollar at a fixed exchange rate, but that there are inherent problems with having the US Federal Reserve thus control Canadian interest rates. He then wrote that, “there is a solution to this lack of credibility. In Europe, it came through the creation of the euro and formal end of the ability of national central banks to set interest rates. The analogous creation of the amero is not possible without the unlikely co-operation of the United States. This leaves the credibility issue to be solved by the unilateral adoption of a currency board, which would ensure that international payments imbalances automatically lead to changes in Canada's money supply and interest rates until the imbalances are ended, all without any actions by the Bank of Canada or influence by politicians. It would be desirable to create simultaneously the currency board and a New Canadian Dollar valued at par with the U.S. dollar. With longer-run competitiveness assured at US90¢ to the U.S. dollar.”

In January of 2009, an online publication of the Wall Street Journal, called Market Watch, discussed the possibility of hyperinflation of the United States dollar, and then stated, regarding the possibility of an amero, “On its face, while difficult to imagine, it makes intuitive sense. The ability to combine Canadian natural resources, American ingenuity and cheap Mexican labor would allow North America to compete better on a global stage.” The author further states that, “If forward policy attempts to induce more debt rather than allowing savings and obligations to align, we must respect the potential for a system shock. We may need to let a two-tier currency gain traction if the dollar meaningfully debases from current levels,” and that, “If this dynamic plays out -- and I've got no insight that it will - - the global balance of powers would fragment into four primary regions: North America, Europe, Asia and the Middle East. In such a scenario, ramifications would manifest through social unrest and geopolitical conflict.”

A GLOBAL CURRENCY The Phoenix

In 1988, The Economist ran an article titled, Get Ready for the Phoenix, in which they wrote, “THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let's say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today's national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the late twentieth century.” The article stated that, “The market crash [of 1987] taught [governments] that the pretence of policy cooperation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (ie, until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.” Amazingly the article states that, “Several more big exchange-rate upsets, a few more stockmarket crashes and probably a slump or two will be needed before politicians are willing to face squarely up to that choice. This points to a muddled sequence of emergency followed by patch-up followed by emergency, stretching out far beyond 2018-except for two things. As time passes, the damage caused by currency instability is gradually going to mount; and the very trends that will make it mount are making the utopia of monetary union feasible.”

Further, the article stated that, “The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate-and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate-would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit.” The author admits that, “This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.” The article concludes in stating that, “The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.” The last sentence states, “Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.”

Recommendations for a Global Currency

In 1998, the IMF Survey discussed a speech given by James Tobin, a prominent American economist,

in which he argued that, “A single global currency might offer a viable alternative to the floating

rate.” He further stated that, “there was still a great need” for “lenders of last resort.”

In 1999, economist Judy Shelton addressed the US House of Representatives Committee on Banking

and Financial Services. In her testimony, she stated that, “The continued expansion of free trade, the

increased integration of financial markets and the advent of electronic commerce are all working to

bring about the need for an international monetary standard---a global unit of account.” She further

explained that, “Regional currency unions seem to be the next step in the evolution toward some

kind of global monetary order. Europe has already adopted a single currency. Asia may organize into

a regional currency bloc to offer protection against speculative assaults on the individual currencies

of weaker nations. Numerous countries in Latin America are considering various monetary

arrangements to insulate them from financial contagion and avoid the economic consequences of

devaluation. An important question is whether this process of monetary evolution will be intelligently

directed or whether it will simply be driven by events. In my opinion, political leadership can play a

decisive role in helping to build a more orderly, rational monetary system than the current free-for-all

approach to exchange rate relations.”

She further stated that, “As we have seen in Europe, the sequence of development is (1) you build a

common market, and (2) you establish a common currency. Indeed, until you have a common

currency, you don’t truly have an efficient common market.” She concludes by stating, “Ideally, every

nation should stand willing to convert its currency at a fixed rate into a universal reserve asset. That

would automatically create a global monetary union based on a common unit of account. The

alternative path to a stable monetary order is to forge a common currency anchored to an asset of

intrinsic value. While the current momentum for dollarization should be encouraged, especially for

Mexico and Canada, in the end the stability of the global monetary order should not rest on any

single nation.”

Paul Volcker, former Governor of the Federal Reserve Board, stated in 2000, that, “If we are to have a

truly global economy, a single world currency makes sense.” In a speech delivered by a member of

the Executive Board of the European Central Bank, it was stated that Paul Volcker “might be right,

and we might one day have a single world currency. Maybe European integration, in the same way as

any other regional integration, could be seen as a step towards the ideal situation of a fully

integrated world. If and when this world will see the light of day is impossible to say. However, what I

can say is that this vision seems as impossible now to most of us as a European monetary union

seemed 50 years ago, when the process of European integration started.”

In 2000, the IMF held an international conference and published a brief report titled, One World, One

Currency: Destination or Delusion?, in which it was stated that, “As perceptions grow that the world

is gradually segmenting into a few regional currency blocs, the logical extension of such a trend also

emerges as a theoretical possibility: a single world currency. If so many countries see benefits from

currency integration, would a world currency not maximize these benefits?”

It outlines how, “The dollar bloc, already underpinned by the strength of the U.S. economy, has been

extended further by dollarization and regional free trade pacts. The euro bloc represents an

economic union that is intended to become a full political union likely to expand into Central and

Eastern Europe. A yen bloc may emerge from current proposals for Asian monetary cooperation. A

currency union may emerge among Mercosur members in Latin America, a geographical currency

zone already exists around the South African rand, and a merger of the Australian and New Zealand

dollars is a perennial topic in Oceania.” The summary states that, “The same commercial efficiencies, economies of scale, and physical

imperatives that drive regional currencies together also presumably exist on the next level—the

global scale.” Further, it reported that, “The smaller and more vulnerable economies of the world—

those that the international community is now trying hardest to help—would have most to gain from

the certainty and stability that would accompany a single world currency.” 288 Keep in mind, this

document was produced by the IMF, and so its recommendations for what it says would likely “help”

the smaller and more vulnerable countries of the world, should be taken with a grain – or bucket – of

salt.

Economist Robert A. Mundell has long called for a global currency. On his website, he states that the

creation of a global currency is “a project that would restore a needed coherence to the international

monetary system, give the International Monetary Fund a function that would help it to promote

stability, and be a catalyst for international harmony.” He states that, “The benefits from a world

currency would be enormous. Prices all over the world would be denominated in the same unit and

would be kept equal in different parts of the world to the extent that the law of one price was

allowed to work itself out. Apart from tariffs and controls, trade between countries would be as easy

as it is between states of the United States.”

Renewed Calls for a Global Currency

On March 16, 2009, Russia suggested that, “the G20 summit in London in April should start

establishing a system of managing the process of globalization and consider the possibility of creating

a supra-national reserve currency or a ‘super-reserve currency’.” Russia called for “the creation of a

supra-national reserve currency that will be issued by international financial institutions,” and that,

“It looks expedient to reconsider the role of the IMF in that process and also to determine the

possibility and need for taking measures that would allow for the SDRs (Special Drawing Rights) to

become a super-reserve currency recognized by the world community.”

On March 23, 2009, it was reported that China’s central bank “proposed replacing the US dollar as

the international reserve currency with a new global system controlled by the International Monetary

Fund.” The goal would be for the world reserve currency that is “disconnected from individual

nations and is able to remain stable in the long run, thus removing the inherent deficiencies caused

by using credit-based national currencies.” The chief China economist for HSBC stated that, “This is a

clear sign that China, as the largest holder of US dollar financial assets, is concerned about the

potential inflationary risk of the US Federal Reserve printing money.” The Governor of the People’s

Bank of China, the central bank, “suggested expanding the role of special drawing rights, which were

introduced by the IMF in 1969 to support the Bretton Woods fixed exchange rate regime but became

less relevant once that collapsed in the 1970s.” Currently, “the value of SDRs is based on a basket of

four currencies – the US dollar, yen, euro and sterling – and they are used largely as a unit of account

by the IMF and some other international organizations.”

However, “China’s proposal would expand the basket of currencies forming the basis of SDR

valuation to all major economies and set up a settlement system between SDRs and other currencies

so they could be used in international trade and financial transactions. Countries would entrust a

portion of their SDR reserves to the IMF to manage collectively on their behalf and SDRs would

gradually replace existing reserve currencies.”

On March 25, Timothy Geithner, Treasury Secretary and former President of the New York Federal

Reserve, spoke at the Council on Foreign Relations, when asked a question about his thoughts on the

Chinese proposal for the global reserve currency, Geithner replied that, “I haven't read the governor's

proposal. He's a remarkably -- a very thoughtful, very careful, distinguished central banker.

Generally find him sensible on every issue. But as I understand his proposal, it's a proposal designed

to increase the use of the IMF's special drawing rights. And we're actually quite open to that

suggestion. But you should think of it as rather evolutionary, building on the current architectures,

than -- rather than -- rather than moving us to global monetary union [Emphasis added].”

In late March, it was reported that, “A United Nations panel of economists has proposed a new global

currency reserve that would take over the US dollar-based system used for decades by international

banks,” and that, “An independently administered reserve currency could operate without conflicts

posed by the US dollar and keep commodity prices more stable.”

A recent article in the Economic Times stated that, “The world is not yet ready for an international

reserve currency, but is ready to begin the process of shifting to such a currency. Otherwise, it would

remain too vulnerable to the hegemonic nation,” as in, the United States. Another article in the

Economic Times started by proclaiming that, “the world certainly needs an international currency.”

Further, the article stated that, “With an unwillingness to accept dollars and the absence of an

alternative, international payments system can go into a freeze beyond the control of monetary

authorities leading the world economy into a Great Depression,” and that, “In order to avoid such a

calamity, the international community should immediately revive the idea of the Substitution

Account mooted in 1971, under which official holders of dollars can deposit their unwanted dollars in

a special account in the IMF with the values of deposits denominated in an international currency

such as the SDR of the IMF.”

Amidst fears of a falling dollar as a result of the increased open discussion of a new global currency, it

was reported that, “The dollar’s role as a reserve currency won’t be threatened by a nine-fold

expansion in the International Monetary Fund’s unit of account, according to UBS AG, ING Groep NV

and Citigroup Inc.” This was reported following the recent G20 meeting, at which, “Group of 20

leaders yesterday gave approval for the agency to raise $250 billion by issuing Special Drawing Rights,

or SDRs, the artificial currency that the IMF uses to settle accounts among its member nations. It also

agreed to put another $500 billion into the IMF’s war chest.” In other words, the large global

financial institutions came to the rhetorical rescue of the dollar, so as not to precipitate a crisis in its

current standing, so that they can continue with quietly forming a new global currency.

 

 

 

 

CREATING A WORLD CENTRAL BANK

In 1998, Jeffrey Garten wrote an article for the New York Times advocating a “global Fed.” Garten

was former Dean of the Yale School of Management, former Undersecretary of Commerce for

International Trade in the Clinton administration, previously served on the White House Council on

International Economic Policy under the Nixon administration and on the policy planning staffs of

Secretaries of State Henry Kissinger and Cyrus Vance of the Ford and Carter administrations, former

Managing Director at Lehman Brothers, and is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. In his

article written in 1998, he stated that, “over time the United States set up crucial central institutions -

- the Securities and Exchange Commission (1933), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (1934)

and, most important, the Federal Reserve (1913). In so doing, America became a managed national

economy. These organizations were created to make capitalism work, to prevent destructive business

cycles and to moderate the harsh, invisible hand of Adam Smith.”

He then explained that, “This is what now must occur on a global scale. The world needs an

institution that has a hand on the economic rudder when the seas become stormy. It needs a global

central bank.” He explains that, “Simply trying to coordinate the world's powerful central banks -- the

Fed and the new European Central Bank, for instance -- wouldn't work,” and that, “Effective

collaboration among finance ministries and treasuries is also unlikely to materialize. These agencies

are responsible to elected legislatures, and politics in the industrial countries is more preoccupied

with internal events than with international stability.”

He then postulates that, “An independent central bank with responsibility for maintaining global

financial stability is the only way out. No one else can do what is needed: inject more money into the

system to spur growth, reduce the sky-high debts of emerging markets, and oversee the operations

of shaky financial institutions. A global central bank could provide more money to the world economy

when it is rapidly losing steam.” Further, “Such a bank would play an oversight role for banks and

other financial institutions everywhere, providing some uniform standards for prudent lending in

places like China and Mexico. [However, t]he regulation need not be heavy-handed.” Garten

continues, “There are two ways a global central bank could be financed. It could have lines of credit

from all central banks, drawing on them in bad times and repaying when the markets turn up.

Alternately -- and admittedly more difficult to carry out -- it could be financed by a very modest tariff

on all trade, collected at the point of importation, or by a tax on certain global financial transactions.”

Interestingly, Garten states that, “One thing that would not be acceptable would be for the bank to

be at the mercy of short-term-oriented legislatures.” In essence, it is not to be accountable to the

people of the world. So, he asks the question, “To whom would a global central bank be accountable?

It would have too much power to be governed only by technocrats, although it must be led by the

best of them. One possibility would be to link the new bank to an enlarged Group of Seven -- perhaps

a ''G-15'' [or in today’s context, the G20] that would include the G-7 plus rotating members like

Mexico, Brazil, South Africa, Poland, India, China and South Korea.” He further states that, “There

would have to be very close collaboration” between the global bank and the Fed, and that, “The

global bank would not operate within the United States, and it would not be able to override the

decisions of our central bank. But it could supply the missing international ingredient -- emergency

financing for cash-starved emerging markets. It wouldn't affect American mortgage rates, but it could

help the profitability of American multinational companies by creating a healthier global environment

for their businesses.”

In September of 2008, Jeffrey Garten wrote an article for the Financial Times in which he stated that,

“Even if the US’s massive financial rescue operation succeeds, it should be followed by something

even more far-reaching – the establishment of a Global Monetary Authority to oversee markets that

have become borderless.” He emphasized the “need for a new Global Monetary Authority. It would

set the tone for capital markets in a way that would not be viscerally opposed to a strong public

oversight function with rules for intervention, and would return to capital formation the goal of

economic growth and development rather than trading for its own sake.”

Further, the “GMA would be a reinsurer or discounter for certain obligations held by central banks. It

would scrutinize the regulatory activities of national authorities with more teeth than the IMF has

and oversee the implementation of a limited number of global regulations. It would monitor global

risks and establish an effective early warning system with more clout to sound alarms than the BIS

has.” Moreover, “The biggest global financial companies would have to register with the GMA and be

subject to its monitoring, or be blacklisted. That includes commercial companies and banks, but also

sovereign wealth funds, gigantic hedge funds and private equity firms.” He recommends that its

board “include central bankers not just from the US, UK, the eurozone and Japan, but also China,

Saudi Arabia and Brazil. It would be financed by mandatory contributions from every capable country

and from insurance-type premiums from global financial companies – publicly listed, government

owned, and privately held alike.”

In October of 2008, it was reported that Morgan Stanley CEO John Mack stated that, “it may take

continued international coordination to fully unlock the credit markets and resolve the financial

crisis, perhaps even by forming a new global body to oversee the process.”

In late October of 2008, Jeffrey Garten wrote an article for Newsweek in which he stated that,

“leaders should begin laying the groundwork for establishing a global central bank.” He explained

that, “There was a time when the U.S. Federal Reserve played this role [as governing financial

authority of the world], as the prime financial institution of the world's most powerful economy,

overseeing the one global currency. But with the growth of capital markets, the rise of currencies like

the euro and the emergence of powerful players such as China, the shift of wealth to Asia and the

Persian Gulf and, of course, the deep-seated problems in the American economy itself, the Fed no

longer has the capability to lead single-handedly.”

He explains the criteria and operations of a world central bank, saying that, “It could be the lead

regulator of big global financial institutions, such as Citigroup or Deutsche Bank, whose activities spill

across borders,” as well as “act as a bankruptcy court when big global banks that operate in multiple

countries need to be restructured. It could oversee not just the big commercial banks, such as

Mitsubishi UFJ, but also the "alternative" financial system that has developed in recent years,

consisting of hedge funds, private-equity groups and sovereign wealth funds—all of which are now

substantially unregulated.” Further, it “could have influence over key exchange rates, and might lead

a new monetary conference to realign the dollar and the yuan, for example, for one of its first

missions would be to deal with the great financial imbalances that hang like a sword over the world

economy.”

He further postulates that, “A global central bank would not eliminate the need for the Federal

Reserve or other national central banks, which will still have frontline responsibility for sound

regulatory policies and monetary stability in their respective countries. But it would have heavy

influence over them when it comes to following policies that are compatible with global growth and

financial stability. For example, it would work with key countries to better coordinate national

stimulus programs when the world enters a recession, as is happening now, so that the cumulative

impact of the various national efforts do not so dramatically overshoot that they plant the seeds for a

crisis of global inflation. This is a big threat as government spending everywhere goes into overdrive.”

300

In January of 2009, it was reported that, “one clear solution to avoid a repeat of the problems would

be the establishment of a "global central bank" – with the IMF and World Bank being unable to

prevent the financial meltdown.” Dr. William Overholt, senior research fellow at Harvard's Kennedy

School, formerly with the Rand Institute, gave a speech in Dubai in which he said that, “To avoid

another crisis, we need an ability to manage global liquidity. Theoretically that could be achieved

through some kind of global central bank, or through the creation of a global currency, or through

global acceptance of a set of rules with sanctions and a dispute settlement mechanism.” 301

Guillermo Calvo, Professor of Economics, International and Public Affairs at Columbia University

wrote an article for VOX in late March of 2009. Calvo is the former Chief Economist of the Inter-

American Development Bank, and is currently a Research Associate at the National Bureau of

Economic Research (NBER) and President of the International Economic Association and the former

Senior Advisor in the Research Department of the IMF.

He wrote that, “Credit availability is not ensured by stricter financial regulation. In fact, it can be

counterproductive unless it is accompanied by the establishment of a lender of last resort (LOLR) that

radically softens the severity of financial crisis by providing timely credit lines. With that aim in mind,

the 20th century saw the creation of national or regional central banks in charge of a subset of the

capital market. It has now become apparent that the realm of existing central banks is very limited

and the world has no institution that fulfils the necessary global role. The IMF is moving in that

direction, but it is still too small and too limited to adequately do so.”

He advocates that, “the first proposal that I would like to make is that the topic of financial regulation

should be discussed together with the issue of a global lender of last resort.” Further, he proposed

that, “international financial institutions must be quickly endowed with considerably more firepower

to help emerging economies through the deleveraging period.” 302

 

A “NEW WORLD ORDER” IN BANKING

In March of 2008, following the collapse of Bear Stearns, Reuters reported on a document released

by research firm CreditSights, which said that, “Financial firms face a ‘new world order’,” and that,

“More industry consolidation and acquisitions may follow after JPMorgan Chase & Co.” Further, “In

the event of future consolidation, potential acquirers identified by CreditSights include

JPMorganChase, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America.”

In June of 2008, before he was Treasury Secretary in the Obama administration, Timothy Geithner, as

head of the New York Federal Reserve, wrote an article for the Financial Times following his

attendance at the 2008 Bilderberg conference, in which he wrote that, “Banks and investment banks

whose health is crucial to the global financial system should operate under a unified regulatory

framework,” and he said that, “the US Federal Reserve should play a "central role" in the new

regulatory framework, working closely with supervisors in the US and around the world.”

In November of 2008, The National, a prominent United Arab Emirate newspaper, reported on Baron

David de Rothschild accompanying Prime Minister Gordon Brown on a visit to the Middle East,

although not as a “part of the official party” accompanying Brown. Following an interview with the

Baron, it was reported that, “Rothschild shares most people’s view that there is a new world order. In

his opinion, banks will deleverage and there will be a new form of global governance.”

In February of 2009, the Times Online reported that a “New world order in banking [is] necessary,”

and that, “It is increasingly evident that the world needs a new banking system and that it should not

bear much resemblance to the one that has failed so spectacularly.” But of course, the ones that

are shaping this new banking system are the champions of the previous banking system. The

solutions that will follow are simply the extensions of the current system, only sped up through the

necessity posed by the current crisis.

AN EMERGING GLOBAL GOVERNMENT

A recent article in the Financial Post stated that, “The danger in the present course is that if the world

moves to a “super sovereign” reserve currency engineered by experts, such as the “UN Commission

of Experts” led by Nobel laureate economist Joseph Stiglitz, we would give up the possibility of a

spontaneous money order and financial harmony for a centrally planned order and the politicization

of money. Such a regime change would endanger not only the future value of money but, more

importantly, our freedom and prosperity.”

Further, “An uncomfortable characteristic of the new world order may well turn out to be that global

income gaps will widen because the rising powers, such as China, India and Brazil, regard those below

them on the ladder as potential rivals.” The author further states that, “The new world order thus

won't necessarily be any better than the old one,” and that, “What is certain, though, is that global

affairs are going to be considerably different from now on.”

In April of 2009, Robert Zoellick, President of the World Bank, said that, “If leaders are serious about

creating new global responsibilities or governance, let them start by modernizing multilateralism to

empower the WTO, the IMF, and the World Bank Group to monitor national policies.” 309

David Rothkopf, a scholar at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, former Deputy

Undersecretary of Commerce for International Trade in the Clinton administration, and former

managing director of Kissinger and Associates, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations,

recently wrote a book titled, Superclass: The Global Power Elite and the World They are Making, of

which he is certainly a member. When discussing the role and agenda of the global “superclass”, he

states that, “In a world of global movements and threats that don’t present their passports at

national borders, it is no longer possible for a nation-state acting alone to fulfill its portion of the

social contract.”

He writes that, “even the international organizations and alliances we have today, flawed as they are,

would have seemed impossible until recently, notably the success of the European Union – a unitary

democratic state the size of India. The evolution and achievements of such entities against all odds

suggest not isolated instances but an overall trend in the direction of what Tennyson called “the

Parliament of Man,” or ‘universal law’.” He states that he is “optimistic that progress will continue to

be made,” but it will be difficult, because it “undercuts many national and local power structures and

cultural concepts that have foundations deep in the bedrock of human civilization, namely the notion

of sovereignty.”

He further writes that, “Mechanisms of global governance are more achievable in today’s

environment,” and that these mechanisms “are often creative with temporary solutions to urgent

problems that cannot wait for the world to embrace a bigger and more controversial idea like real

global government.”

In December of 2008, the Financial Times ran an article written by Gideon Rachman, a past Bilderberg

attendee, who wrote that, “for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world

government is plausible,” and that, “A ‘world government’ would involve much more than cooperation

between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of

laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could

be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service

and the ability to deploy military force.”

He then asks if the European model could “go global,” and states that there are three reasons for

thinking that may be the case. First, he states, “it is increasingly clear that the most difficult issues

facing national governments are international in nature: there is global warming, a global financial

crisis and a ‘global war on terror’.” Secondly, he states that, “It could be done,” largely as a result of

the transport and communications revolutions having “shrunk the world.” Thirdly, this is made

possible through an awakening “change in the political atmosphere,” as “The financial crisis and

climate change are pushing national governments towards global solutions, even in countries such as

China and the US that are traditionally fierce guardians of national sovereignty.”

He quoted an adviser to French President Nicolas Sarkozy as saying, “Global governance is just a

euphemism for global government,” and that the “core of the international financial crisis is that we

have global financial markets and no global rule of law.” However, Rachman states that any push

towards a global government “will be a painful, slow process.” He then states that a key problem in

this push can be explained with an example from the EU, which “has suffered a series of humiliating

defeats in referendums, when plans for “ever closer union” have been referred to the voters. In

general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been agreed by technocrats

and politicians – and then pushed through without direct reference to the voters. International

governance tends to be effective, only when it is anti-democratic.”

 

 

In November of 2008, the United States National Intelligence Council (NIC), the US intelligence

community’s “center for midterm and long-term strategic thinking,” released a report that it

produced in collaboration with numerous think tanks, consulting firms, academic institutions and

hundreds of other experts, among them are the Atlantic Council of the United States, the Wilson

Center, RAND Corporation, the Brookings Institution, American Enterprise Institute, Texas A&M

University, the Council on Foreign Relations and Chatham House in London.

The report, titled, Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World, outlines the current global political and

economic trends that the world may be going through by the year 2025. In terms of the financial

crisis, it states that solving this “will require long-term efforts to establish a new international

system.” It suggests that as the “China-model” for development becomes increasingly attractive,

there may be a “decline in democratization” for emerging economies, authoritarian regimes, and

“weak democracies frustrated by years of economic underperformance.” Further, the dollar will

cease to be the global reserve currency, as there would likely be a “move away from the dollar.”

It states that the dollar will become “something of a first among equals in a basket of currencies by

2025. This could occur suddenly in the wake of a crisis, or gradually with global rebalancing.” The

report elaborates on the construction of a new international system, stating that, “By 2025, nationstates

will no longer be the only – and often not the most important – actors on the world stage and

the ‘international system’ will have morphed to accommodate the new reality. But the

transformation will be incomplete and uneven.” Further, it would be “unlikely to see an overarching,

comprehensive, unitary approach to global governance. Current trends suggest that global

governance in 2025 will be a patchwork of overlapping, often ad hoc and fragmented efforts, with

shifting coalitions of member nations, international organizations, social movements, NGOs,

philanthropic foundations, and companies.” It also notes that, “Most of the pressing transnational

problems – including climate change, regulation of globalized financial markets, migration, failing

states, crime networks, etc. – are unlikely to be effectively resolved by the actions of individual

nation-states. The need for effective global governance will increase faster than existing mechanisms

can respond.”

The report discusses the topic of regionalism, stating that, “Greater Asian integration, if it occurs,

could fill the vacuum left by a weakening multilaterally based international order but could also

further undermine that order. In the aftermath of the 1997 Asian financial crisis, a remarkable series

of pan-Asian ventures—the most significant being ASEAN + 3—began to take root. Although few

would argue that an Asian counterpart to the EU is a likely outcome even by 2025, if 1997 is taken as

a starting point, Asia arguably has evolved more rapidly over the last decade than the European

integration did in its first decade(s).” It further states that, “movement over the next 15 years toward

an Asian basket of currencies—if not an Asian currency unit as a third reserve—is more than a

theoretical possibility.”

It elaborates that, “Asian regionalism would have global implications, possibly sparking or reinforcing

a trend toward three trade and financial clusters that could become quasi-blocs (North America,

Europe, and East Asia).” These blocs “would have implications for the ability to achieve future global

World Trade Organization agreements and regional clusters could compete in the setting of transregional product standards for IT, biotech, nanotech, intellectual property rights, and other ‘new

economy’ products.”

Extract of INLNews Report of the New World Order _ Barrack Obama Report  PART III:
UNDERSTANDING THE WORLD GOVERNMENT AGENDA

"Obama would be the man tapped to realize the one-world slave labor and control grid..."....Henry Kissinger

The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit surrounding the individuals and organizations involved in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most astute among us. Most people reactwith disbelief and scepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with scepticism by institutional and media influences that were created by the Mother of All mind control organizations: The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in London

Please note there is no doubt on the evidence that the Jihadist crisis,the rapidly unfolding economic depression and accompanying misery for billions of people and the financial crisis the Henry Kissinger talks about, was no accident or natural set of events that the Rothschild-Rockefeller controlled mainstream media have tried desperately to get the average person to believe.. and have been very cleverly abd calculatedly panned, created,manipulated, financed, orchestrated and carried out under orders of those elite pushing for a new world order... Just by the words Henry Kissinger usses and the tone of his words leaves no doubt that he and his other corporate, financial and banking elite are more thatr happy that the world is in such a mess, as they have planned all this. along with the planned reduction of the world's population to under one billion, by various means,...war...starvation, man made earth quakes, Tsamies