MI6PrincessDiannaMurder1




                                                            INLNews.com  
                             Easy to Find...... Hard to Leave..see you there soon at your INLNews.com
                                                                                       International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year
                                                                          .com* $9.99 | .net* $9.99 | .org* $9.99 | .info* $9.99 | .us* $9.99 | .biz* $9.99 | .ws* $9.75 | .name* $7.95
                                                                                                                 Save even more on multi-year registrations!
                                                       INLNews YahooMail HotMail GMail AOLMailUSA MAILYahooMail HotMailGMail AOLMail MyWayMail CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs
                                                 INLNsNYTimes WashNs 
AustStockEx WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust 
                                                                                               WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs TasNews ABCTas DarwinNs 
USA MAIL






Your Daily Motivation from Inspiration Line Add Inspiring Daily Quotes to YOUR Website

Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
INLNews  YahooMail  HotMail  GMail  AOLMail USA MAILMyWayMail 
 CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNsNYTimes WashNs WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust 
WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs 
TasNews ABCTas DarwinNsUSA MAIL


ABC News Video  FOX News Video  FOXBusiness Video  CNN Video  AP Video  BBC News Video  Reuters Video  AFP Video  CNET Video
CNBC Video  Australia 7 News Video   Rocky Mountain News Elections Video  CBC.ca Video  NPR Audio  
Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone Video
Richard Bangs Adventures Video  Charlie Rose Video   Expanded Books Video  Assignment Earth Video 
ROOFTOPCOMEDY.com Video 
Guinness World Records Video  weather.com Video  AccuWeather Video  You Witness News User Video

NPR Audio BY CATEGORY Top Stories  Politics  World  Business  Sports 
 
Technology  Health & Science  Arts  U.S. 

VIEW LOCAL VIDEO KVUE-TV Austin  WJZ 13 Baltimore  WBZ Boston 
 
WCNC Charlotte  CBS 2 Chicago

Video by Category
 
U.S. Business  World  Entertainment  Sports  Tech  Politics Science 
Health Environment Weather Opinion  Odd 

Video by Topic Campaign '08   Wall Street  Iraq  Gas Prices  Mideast Conflict 
 
Climate Change 

More INL News Video !Finance Sports


Video by Category
 
U.S. Business  World  Entertainment  Sports  Tech  Politics Science 
Health Environment Weather Opinion  Odd 

Video by Topic Campaign '08   Wall Street  Iraq  Gas Prices  Mideast Conflict 
 
Climate Change 

More INL News Video !Finance Sports











http://www.whale.to/c/das_neue41.html

MI5  Diana

Das Neue, No. 41


Lady Diana was Killed by a Team of Specialists of the British MI-5

WIESBADEN, Oct. 9-- The cover story in issue No. 41, of the German illustrated weekly {Das Neue} hinted. The core of the story is an exclusive interview with "Glyn Jones", a former member of the elite military unit that observed Diana from 1985 to 1989, on orders from the MI-5.

After introducing the theme with a hint that Martine Monteil, the head of the Paris police investigation team, is looking into the case as an assassination case, and that the MI-5 is a suspect, Das Neue asks Jones about his 1985-1989 mission. He relates that he was with the "Royal Marines", then, and was operating upon directives coming from MI-5.

The job of his team "was not to spy on members of the Royal Family. Foreign agencies warned the MI-5 at that time, that there was a threat to Diana. That is why she was surveilled." "That implied: We would have had to kill her, if we were not able to prevent an abduction."

The main objective of the team was to protect the Royal House, the future King (Diana's son), and the Anglican Church. All of that was threatened by Diana's bad conduct, Jones said. When Das Neue asked, whether the "drunken" driver, Henri Paul, didn't play a role in the accident, Jones said: "Yes, in the end, it was a reason. But why did this accident occur, in the first place? Why is the French police not able to identify those two men, that stood on the bridge above the tunnel, who were firing shots on the car?" "Two shots were fired on the tires.

So far, this has not been made public. They are trying to cover it up." Jones said that traces of the shots would not necessarily be found, because "this depends on the angle at which the bullet hits--this can hardly be checked, if the tire is ripped into pieces.

This, at least, is how it is done in anti-terror measures in Northern Ireland, when any outside implication is to be covered up." Jones said that it is not French sloppiness which prevents a real investigation in Paris, but that it rather implies that "the French secret service is collaborating with the British secret service.

There are close contacts... [I]t would not be in the interest of the French government to let such things get out to the public." The interview was accompanied by a box, which explained how the sniper attack on Di's car could have occurred.

First of all, the British SAS is equipped with a special gun, the "Five-Seven" which is produced by the French firm, FN Herstal. This is an ultralight weapon, which works like a "heavy gun," however, because its ammunition can cut through steel and bullet-proof vests, from 200 meters away.

The special bullets, which have a weight of only 2 grams each, leave no visible tracks in the target.

Weapons expert "Bernard Sacrez" explained to Das Neue that "with this weapon, you can slice the tires of a car as if you used a razor blade. No tracks of the shot can be located, because the two-gram bullet disassembles completely, afterwards."

Al Fayed's security team included 8 former SAS agents, by the way, the Das Neue report said. Dodi's bodyguard Alexander Wingfield was one of them, and he switched shift with Trevor Rees-Jones (the body-guard that survived) that night. "Glyn Jones" said it looks like an orchestration, because the drivers also switched shifts that night.

http://www.public-interest.co.uk/diana/dimi5.htm

http://www.whale.to/b/james_andanson.html

[back] Diana murder

James Andanson worked for MI6 British Intelligence as an informant

Daily Express | Sep 3, 2007

The development could support the theory that Andanson was murdered by the security services.

By Cyril Dixon

THE mystery over Princess Diana’s fatal car crash took another twist yesterday when startling new evidence emerged about the death of a key witness.

The Daily Express has uncovered dramatic new information which undermines the French police claim that photographer James Andanson doused himself and his black BMW with petrol and set himself alight.

Andanson was found dead in his burnt-out car three years after the smash which killed Diana, her lover Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul.

Andanson, suspected of causing the crash by driving a white Fiat Uno into their Mercedes, was said officially to have committed suicide.

But investigators have uncovered a receipt which shows that although Andanson, 54, did buy a substantial amount of fuel on the day he died, it was diesel, not petrol.

Unlike petrol, diesel is not highly inflammable at normal temperatures and would not have ignited if he had struck a match.

You would not be able to set light to diesel with a match.

He used his credit card to buy more than 100 litres of diesel on a visit to a hypermarket near Nant, southern France.

Sceptics would say it is far more likely that the experienced paparazzo bought it to fill up his car for the 400-mile journey back to his home in central France.

They would also think it unlikely for him to prepare his car for a long trip if he planned to kill himself just a few miles away.

The development could support the theory that Andanson was murdered by the security services.

Dodi’s father Mohamed Al Fayed believes he was on the intelligence payroll and that he was killed to stop him exposing a plot to assassinate his son and the Princess.

The Harrods owner’s belief is supported by the evidence of a new witness, a policeman, who said he saw what looked like a bullet hole in the dead photographer’s head.

The officer backs up claims by Christophe Pelat, the fireman who discovered the body, that Andanson had been shot in the head.

Two months ago, Pelat said: “I saw him at close range and I’m absolutely convinced that he had been shot in the head.”

Yesterday’s revelation came just days after the police officer who ran the initial inquiry into how Diana died in Paris’s Alma tunnel blamed the Fiat driver.

Jean Claude Mules said he had compelling evidence that the black Mercedes collided with the Fiat seconds before it ploughed into a pillar. He said his officers would have “had their killer” if they had succeeded in tracing the driver.

Andanson was found dead on May 4 2000 in woodland alongside a country road near Nant, in the Aveyron region of France.

He had apparently left his wife Elizabeth, 45, at their farmhouse in Lignieres, 170 miles south of Paris, and driven 400 miles south to Nant.

A police spokesman said at the time: “He took his own life by dousing himself and the car with petrol and then setting light to it.”

But Andanson’s credit card records show he went into a Géant hypermarket just a few miles away from where he was found dead.

He bought more than 100 litres of diesel and spent almost 600 francs.

Investigators are not certain what he did with the fuel. But his BMW 3 series’ saloon would hold only 60 litres and he may have filled up and transported the surplus in cans. Critically, experts say that it is inconceivable that Andanson would buy diesel to set himself alight.

Ray Holloway, of the Petrol Retailers Association, said: “With petrol it is the vapour that is the risk. It’s very different with diesel.

“Diesel is warmed and compressed to make it fire. You wouldn’t be able to set light to diesel with a match. It would just go out.

“The flashpoint for diesel, that is the temperature it would need to get to, is something like 63C.

“You would need to warm diesel up with something like a blow torch to have any hope of igniting it, and even then you wouldprobably have to be in a confined space.

“People often get burned when using petrol because they try setting light to the liquid.   But what happens is the vapour ignites first.”

The riddle of Andanson’s death will be looked at by Lord Justice Scott Baker, the judge appointed to oversee Diana’s inquest. He has produced a list of 20 questions about the accident which most people assumed had been answered but which must now be re-examined.

Andanson, who worked for the Sipa agency, was famous for his celebrity portraits, including one of Greek shipping tycoon Aristotle Onassis on his death-bed.

But he is also rumoured to have been working for the security services. Former MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson once alleged they use the paparazzi because they are good at tracking the whereabouts of high profile “targets”.

In the summer before the accident, when Diana and Dodi cruised the Mediterranean on his father’s yacht Jonikal, they were plagued by paparazzi. Andanson was one of the biggest players on that scene and was never far away from the couple.

Mr Al Fayed believes Diana, 36, and Dodi, 42, were murdered in a conspiracy driven by the Royal Family and carried out by the security services in August 1997.

He claims they had fallen in love after spending the summer together and planned to marry.

Mr Al Fayed claims the Royals objected to their romance because they did not want Prince William to have a stepfather who was non-white and a Muslim.

http://www.whale.to/b/diana_crash_witness.html




Diana crash witness: I saw a dozen 'shady figures' in tunnel

Last updated at 23:22pm on 30.09.06
             Jacques Morel
Jacques Morel claims he saw 'shady figures' before Princess Diana's fatal car crash
A key eyewitness to the car crash that killed Princess Diana has broken his silence to tell how he saw a dozen people at the scene moments before her death.
Record producer Jacques Morel, 59, is convinced they expected to see her Mercedes brought to a halt by another car.
Detectives working on the inquiry into Diana's death, headed by former Scotland Yard chief Lord Stevens, considered his account so important that he was flown to London and interviewed for three days.
Mr Morel, who was driving home with his wife Moufida in Paris on the night of August 31, 1997, said: "As we entered the Alma tunnel I looked to my left and saw about a dozen shady figures on a tiny pavement by the side of the opposite carriageway.
"They were all standing in a long line. The sight was unforgettable.
"The pavement is less than 30cm (12in) wide and next to fast traffic. They would have been breathing in petrol fumes and it was very dirty down there. It was certainly not a sensible place to stand around."
If accurate, Mr Morel's recollections are significant because they suggest that the route Diana and Dodi Al Fayed were taking was known in advance.
Until now it has always been thought that chauffeur Henri Paul was following an unexpected route in order to shake off paparazzi photographers.
Mr Morel, who now lives in Tunisia, said: "There was an almighty bang and a great big flash of light. Immediately my wife and I realised there had been a crash.
"My first thought was that those inside the tunnel were connected with what had happened. This thought has never left me.
"We could see a car coming from the opposite direction had gone straight into a pillar. All of the other drivers stopped, so I did too.
"There was a symphony of car horns and then white smoke filled the tunnel. I got out of my car and rushed towards the crash scene.
"I was devastated when I saw the Princess in her white trousers in the back of the car. She was easily recognisable.
"She looked so serene and peaceful, but it was the end. It was one of the most heartbreaking scenes of my life. I will never forget seeing her face.
"Others were lying around Diana and I remember the driver looking as though he had his head in his hands. It was then that I also saw a white Fiat Uno being driven away."
The car was later reported to be registered to James Andanson, a paparazzi photographer who committed suicide in mysterious circumstances in 2000. However, the vehicle has never been found.
Mr Morel, who has written a book about his experiences, told British detectives Philip Easton and Mark Hodges that he believes Paul was in on the plot.
"I am certain he was paid to drive through the Alma tunnel. There was cash in Henri Paul's pocket when he was found dead,' said Mr Morel.
Blood tests revealed that Paul was three times over the French drink-drive limit when the crash took place. Traces of anti-depressant drugs were also found.
The inquiry headed by Lord Stevens, which has taken 1,500 witness statements, is expected to deliver its report by Christmas






DIANA

[Someone who was well  loved (see) gets a public (covert) execution (see), like Kennedy. Arizona Wilder mentions how she (Wilder) was impregnated yet still menstruated.  CCTV tapes unavailable, just like the ones outside the Murray building and the Pentagon (911).  Just one of the numerous red flags.]
[2012 Dec] WHAT WAS MI6 TEAM DOING IN PARIS THE NIGHT PRINCESS DIANA DIED?   RUSSIAN intelligence agents in France had become suspicious of the sudden arrival of three senior MI6 officers in Paris before Princess Diana’s death
[vid] Princess Diana Evidence of Assassination: Jon King on Edge Media TV Boston Brakes, Camilla car accident (20:00), Land mines (32) 200 Million land mines deployed around the world, 200 million stockpiled, 3 weeks after Diana died Clinton did a U turn on banning land mines, CCTV (35) turned inwards, 3 vehicles disappeared without trace (40), Anderson in tunnel (47), Professor DominiqueLecompte (50), Boston Brakes assassination (1:00:00), seat belt jammed (1:00:44), media primed (1:00:20), Tomlinson got at, Henri Paul MI6 agent, patsy (1:12:00), embalmed illegally, Keith Moss gave order who was Consul general at British embassy (1:20:00), Burrell ordered to burn her personal belongings, crucial forensic evidence (1:23:00), Charles had team of embalmers with him when he went to France incase French didn't get there first (1:24:00), engagement ring (1:25:00), DA Ministry of Defence notice to pull newspaper story around his book (1:34:00)

 Interview with princess Diana's confidant Christine Fitzgerald
[2011 May] Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see  Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.
[2009 Feb] Diana: Can You See The Real Me?: The Greatest Spiritual Energy Extraction Scam of the 20th Century By Matthew Delooze  Marilyn was another Serpent Cult symbolic Goddess. Same Scam, different time and different location
DIANA WAS NOT THE TARGET  by Rayelan Allan
 
Lady Diana was Killed by a Team of Specialists of the British MI-5   Why is the French police not able to identify those two men, that stood on the bridge above the tunnel, who were firing shots on the car?" "Two shots were fired on the tires. ..... Jones said that it is not French sloppiness which prevents a real investigation in Paris, but that it rather implies that "the French secret service is collaborating with the British secret service.

Media
[2007] 
James Andanson worked for MI6 British Intelligence as an informant
[2006] 
Diana crash witness: I saw a dozen 'shady figures' in tunnel 
[2006] Jeweler Was Told To Lie In Princess Diana Case 
[2006] Diana: The 18 missing witnesses in £4m inquiry 
[2006] Death-crash Paul "drank Diet Coke."

Author backs Diana conspiracy 


"..They are planning 'an accident' in my car so Charles can marry again...."... revealed note that will stun the world..... Daily Morror Newspaper.....

[2009] Princess Diana’s Death and Memorial: The Occult Meaning What is the purpose of elevating Diana to the level of goddess through mystic symbolism? Numerous theories state that one of Diana’s sons will eventually become the much prophesied Antichrist. Are we making Diana the Virgin Mary of the Antichrist? Is the assassination of Diana, the “Moon Goddess” the response to JFK, the “Sun God” ‘s death? Was she part of a blood ritual due to the royal status of her family’s genealogy? Is the Queen of England actually a reptilian creature that can shape-shift into a 6 foot tall lizard? You can google any of these theories and you’ll find more essays than you can read. I have no proof about any of them so I won’t give a definite answer. One thing is for sure, symbols do not lie. Diana has been surrounded with the world’s most powerful people, and these people have deep knowledge of the occult. Initiates are fully aware of the fact that symbolism is the only true language of humanity and it can only be understood by those who are worthy. Diana’s memorials are PACKED with blatant symbolism, all referring to the same concept of female divinity. The symbols presented in this report weren’t destined to the average population, who still think that Diana died in a car accident. These esoteric codes serve the purpose of the elite, who carry out its rituals according to the secret knowledge it possesses.
Quotes
Arizona Wilder says that the princess Diana death was a ritual public sacrifice to usher in the Age of Horus [Egyptian magical tradition - rebirth of the dead god Osiris]. Because the magicians like to mirror dates, the dark goddess Hecates number is 13, which was why the 31st august was chosen. It was a mirror of a Isis, Osiris, Horus ritual because 3 people died and the unborn baby Diana was carrying was the very special 3 months old. Apparently Baron Rothschild had to be in the tunnel at the 13th pillar where the accident happened to take the soul of Diana - and indeed an ambulance did arrive on the scene a minute after the crash. The driver henri paul was Mind Controlled and trained for the crash. Bits of Diana were then eaten by the hierarchy. Arizona Wylder has said that some Spencers were there at these Rituals, but that Diana would not attend - and that symptoms of Bolemia and Anorexia were mind control techniques used on her. A report from Andrew Hennessey on his observation of the tape he listened to produced by David Icke, The Arizona Wilder Video:
Most of the British Royal family are illegitimate, including Queen Victoria, Prince consort Albert, King Edward VII and his son Winston Churchill. Winston Churchill was first cousin with Adolf Hitler’s father and uncle to Anthony Blunt, King Edward VIII and King George VI. Adolf Hitler’s grandfather ran the Rothschild Bank, the Bank of England, and was the first Jewish MP in British Parliament. 
    
Prince Albert was also the son of a stable boy. Close to bankruptcy, the British Royal family were saved by another stable boy, John Brown, who went on to marry Queen Victoria after Albert ‘died’.
    The British Royal family are a subset of the Rothschild family and the Rothschilds control all the wars and finances of the British monarchy. The British Royal family declare war as soon as the Rothschilds have completed their preparations. This makes for huge profits.
    Many royals died of syphilis and many others died from the treatment of syphilis. When a British royal didn’t like his wife, he simply ordered her murder – on their coronation night. This was repeated again 166 years later with the murder of Princess Diana as covered up by Lord Stevens.   HOW TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD  A Right Royal Con by Greg Hallett.
Now, when Princess Diana died, in 1997, I was one of the first Black people to suspect that Princess Diana had been murdered, and I will tell you why this thing happened, sir.  Because, about a year or 8 months before Diana died, there died a king in Lesotho, King Moshoeshoe II.  King Moshoeshoe II’s death was detail-for-detail identical to Princess Diana’s death.  
    Consider this please, all of you who might find my words incredible:  Princess Diana died in a tunnel, but the king of Lesotho died in a ravine.  He had gone far away to investigate a problem in his cattle ranch.  It was found that he was overdue, and when the people went to search for him, they heard from various boys who were looking after the cattle in the Basotho-land mountains, that the boys had heard what sounded like a rifle shot, and when the men went to look where the rifle shot had sounded, they found the king’s car off the road and deep in the ravine.  They went down their and they found that the king of Lesotho was in his car.  He was strapped in a safety belt, but he had a terrible injury at the back of his head.  And they found that the king’s driver was dead at the steering wheel.  But, the two men who were the king’s bodyguards, who were riding in the king’s vehicle in the seat directly behind the king, had escaped without a scratch.  One of the men entered the car and pulled out the dying king.  The king apologized to them for messing-up their hands with his blood, which was a tradition, that a dying king must thank the people who are trying to get him out of where he is.  And he must apologize to them for putting them into trouble, because anyone who handles the sacred blood of the king is in spiritual trouble of some kind after that.  
    Then, when the king’s car was brought out of the ravine, it was found that there was a hole, like a bullet hole, in one of the tires of the car.  And that car’s tire was mysteriously removed, afterwards, when the king’s car was stored not in a safe place, but in a yard outside where anybody could get at it.  And, when an autopsy was conducted on the body of the driver of the king’s car, it was found that the man had been so drunk as to not have been able to drive the car at all.  And third, the man who had driven the king’s car and who died at the wheel had not been the man who usually drives the king’s car.  
    Now, sir, do you see this mystery now?  The death of the Lesotho king matched that of Princess Diana, which was to follow it.  In many other amazing details than I have detailed now, and so the nation of Lesotho was reduced to a retch after the king’s death, when rioting took place as a result of a general election which provisional party members prospected and controlled.  [Interview] CREDO MUTWA On Alien Abduction & Reptilians
A police spokesman said at the time: “He took his own life by dousing himself and the car with petrol and then setting light to it.” But Andanson’s credit card records show he went into a Géant hypermarket just a few miles away from where he was found dead. He bought more than 100 litres of diesel and spent almost 600 francs.  [2007] James Andanson worked for MI6 British Intelligence as an informant
"One such 'unnamed' source - a former SAS sergeant - reveals that the 'accident' in which Diana died bore all the tell-tail signs of a known special forces assassination technique known as the 'Boston brakes'. Agreed, on first hearing, this sounds a bit James Bond - contrived. But bear with it. Because then you go on to read the testimony of former SAS officer and world famous explorer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes, who confirms that the 'Boston brakes' is indeed a commonly employed assassination technique used by hired 'hit squads', and that it involves the use of a device which remotely controls the target-vehicle's steering and brakes. Fiennes goes on to say that this method has been used at least once in England, and in this regard describes in some detail the assassination of one Major Michael Marman, who was killed in a 'car crash' near Stonehenge in 1986. There's no doubt that the operation that killed Major Marman, as described by Fiennes, as well as by former Equerry to the Queen, Air Marshall Sir Peter Horsley, was chillingly identical to the series of events that killed Diana. Once again I have to say that the way the authors are able to continually corroborate their evidence in this way, throughout the book, is very impressive. " [Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence] Book review by Stephen Reid
But what is even more sensational is the suggestion that Diana had herself become part of the above-mentioned “counter-monarchy problem”. Following her ostracism from the Royal Family, the source claims, Diana was courted by supporters of the little-known Merovingian royal bloodline from which she herself descended, and which is today largely represented by Britain's forgotten Royal House of Stuart. As the authors discover, and despite media propaganda to the contrary, the Stuarts are still alive, well and politically active. And what's more, they still bear legitimate designs on the British Throne. 
    Anyway, the evidence strongly suggests that, in her not-so-private war with the Windsors, Diana became secretly involved in a “succession fight ... a fight over the structure of the future of the Monarchy”. It really is difficult to convey the full range of complexities here, given the space limitations. What I would say, though, is this: those still ignorant of the Stuarts' claim to the Throne; their ongoing struggle to be heard; and perhaps more to the point, Diana's own Stuart heritage, should read this book. At the very least it will cast the Princess in a new political light, one that reveals her as - potentially - a massive threat to the continued succession of the Windsors. And therefore as a prime target for 'removal'. [Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence] Book review by Stephen Reid
"Personally, following my own two year investigation, I am convinced that Diana Princess of Wales was murdered and equally confident that the evidence to prove it is in the files of the British Secret Intelligence Service and the CIA" - Noel Botham
"Anyone who looks at the facts of Diana's death, even stripped down to their bare essentials, cannot emerge without at least the suspicion that she was murdered.  More than eighty percent of British people believe that she was" - Noel Botham
This third scenario suggested that Milosevic could be assassinated by causing his personal limousine to crash. Dr Fishwick proposed to arrange the crash in a tunnel, because the proximity of concrete close to the road would ensure that the crash would be sufficiently violent to cause death or serious injury, and would also reduce the possibility that there might be independent, casual witnesses. Dr Fishwick suggested that one way to cause the crash might be to disorientate the chauffeur using a strobe flash gun, a device which is occasionally deployed by special forces to, for example, disorientate helicopter pilots or terrorists, and about which MI6 officers are briefed about during their training. In short, this scenario bore remarkable similarities to the circumstances and witness accounts of the crash that killed the Princess of Wales, Dodi Al Fayed, and Henri PaulMI6 and the Princess of Wales by Richard John Charles Tomlinson

























14 years after her death, new evidence has emerged that Diana was murdered by MI6 ‘Boston brakes’…

Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s Inquiry

By Jon King
The ‘Boston Brakes’
Fourteen years after her death, new evidence has emerged that Princess Diana was murdered in an MI6-organized ‘Boston brakes’ operation.
Following the 2008 Royal Inquest debacle, which ruled out MI6 involvement in Diana’s death, new evidence has come to light which challenges the ‘official verdict’.
 In their book, “Princess Diana: The Evidence”:http://www.amazon.co.uk/Princess-Diana-Evidence-Jon-King/dp/1561718882/ref=sr_11_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1235477992&sr=11-1_, authors Jon King and John Beveridge present evidence that a highly sophisticated assassination technique was used to cause the princess’s vehicle to crash as it drove through the Alma tunnel, Paris, in the early hours of August 31st, 1997.
The ‘Boston brakes’, they reveal, is the most favoured assassination technique employed by the West’s intelligence services due to its deniability.
For many years following the princess’s death, the authors delved the smoke-and-mirrors underworld of political assassination, gleaning what information they could from well-placed intelligence contacts and former special and elite forces—mercenaries, royal bodyguards, and on ocassion, hired assassins.
Some of these crack military freelancers disclosed details of prior operations in which the ‘Boston brakes’ had been successfully used. Others, who fought in Angola, home of Diana’s landmines campaign, threw light on the secret oil and diamond wars still raging in central Africa, and in particular the dirty arms-for-oil deals carried out by MI6, French DGSE, the CIA and the Bush-Cheney oil syndicate.
The authors were told that by focusing the light of the world’s media on Angola the princess was in danger of exposing these deals, and was thus placing herself “in grave danger”.
For obvious reasons some of the sources quoted in the book remain anonymous. But many are named.

Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s Inquiry

The SAS And The Clinic
Speaking of the ‘Boston brakes’ operation which he believed killed Princess Diana, former SAS sergeant, Dave Cornish, exclusively revealed:
“From the minute the decoy car left the Ritz to the moment the tail car closed in … it was obvious what was going down. Anyone who knows what they’re talking about’ll tell you the same.”
And former Royal bodyguard, Mike Grey, added:
“The operation bore all the classic hallmarks of a security service assassination …. I have no doubts whatsoever, given my twenty years experience in various sections of the security industry, that Diana was assassinated. The security service hallmarks are plain to see.”
But it was former SAS officer and world-famous explorer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes, who offered perhaps the most telling revelation of all.
The ‘Boston brakes’ method of assassination, Fiennes reveals, has been in use since at least the 1980s, and deploys a microchip transceiver which takes over the target vehicle’s steering and brakes at the critical moment.
The method, he says, was first deployed by the CIA in Boston, hence the name. But it has since been adopted by intelligence and security forces the world over, as well as by private security firms and their hit squads.
Fiennes also confirms that the death by ‘road traffic accident’ of SAS Major Michael Marman in England in 1986 was the result of a Boston brakes operation carried out by a private hit squad known as The Clinic.

Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s Inquiry

The Attempt To Assassinate Camilla
Further instances of the Boston brakes in action are also cited in the book, including the death by ‘road traffic accident’ of Diana’s former lover and bodyguard, Barry Mannakee, in 1987, and – staggeringly – the attempted assassination by ‘road traffic accident’ of Camilla Parker Bowles just two months prior to Diana’s own fatal crash.
The story of this never-before-disclosed incident is recounted in some detail in the book.
According to sources quoted by the authors, the attempt on Camilla Parker Bowles’s life was the result of a “constitutional crisis” engendered by Prince Charles’s desire to marry his long-term lover while Diana was still alive.
Indeed, according to Tony Wright, then parliamentary aide to the Lord Chancellor, the crisis was so severe it almost resulted in the disestablishment of the Church The Independent.
As the authors point out, such a move would have amounted to the biggest, most far-reaching constitutional reforms since Henry VIII. And we all know what happened to one or two of his wives…

Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s Inquiry

Seat Belt “Jammed In The Retracted Position”
Other revelations in the book include an interview with a well-known Harley Street specialist [named in the book] who became Diana’s nutritional guru.
Fearing she might have been pregnant, the authors reveal, Diana visited her nutritional guru for dietary advice prior to her final holiday with Dodi Fayed. Following her visit the specialist’s Harley Street clinic was broken into and his computer stolen.
And there are many other fresh concerns raised in this uncompromising cross-examination of the ‘accident theory’, in which the authors assume the roles of prosecuting counsels in what is in effect a ‘people’s inquiry’.
Not least among these concerns is the anomaly surrounding Diana’s seat-belt, which, the authors reveal, was found by the Operation Paget team to have been “jammed in the retracted position” and thus unusable—a fact, like so many others, brushed aside by the Royal Inquest.
Other challenges to the ‘accident theory’ include:
  • Grave concerns over the coroner’s decision to ignore crucial evidence regarding landmines;
  • The true identity of certain members of the paparazzi;
  • The Metropolitan Police cover-up of Diana’s recorded statements about perceived threats on her life;
  • Recorded communications between Diana, Prince Charles and Prince Philip;
  • Concerns about Diana’s illegal embalming, which the authors discover was carried out on the orders of a very high-ranking British ‘diplomat’ stationed at the British Embassy in Paris on the night of the crash [diplomat named in the book];
  • The ‘bullet hole’ found in paparazzo James Andanson’s head, discovered and reported by Police Chief Jean-Michel Lauzun at the scene of the MI6 agent’s mysterious ‘suicide’;
  • And Henri Paul’s spurious blood sample – on which the inquest’s verdict was ultimately based – which, the authors reveal, was never DNA-identified, was taken from a vial labelled ‘unknown male’ and contained a level of carbon monoxide so excessive six of the world’s most eminent forensic experts stated under oath that it could not possibly have belonged to Henri Paul.

Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s Inquiry

Also In ‘Princess Diana – The Evidence’
  • An unforgiving exposé on the “wholly flawed and contrived” Royal Inquest;
  • A comprehensive, 60,000-word critique of Lord Stevens’ Operation Paget investigation;
  • An extensive dossier on the mismanagement of the French Inquiry;
  • Plus compelling evidence of a plot to assassinate Diana dating back to November 1995.
Incredibly, “Princess Diana: The Evidence”:http://www.amazon.co.uk/Princess-Diana-Evidence-Jon-King/dp/1561718882/ref=sr_11_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1235477992&sr=11-1 also reveals foreknowledge of a prime-target assassination being planned by MI6 one week prior to Diana’s fatal crash.
The authors are calling for a ‘People’s Inquiry’ to be launched into the incident.
Little wonder this book is billed as ‘The Book the British Government Tried To Ban!’
● ● ●
  • See also: “William Suspects Conspiracy, Dodi Fayed’s Father Claims”:/news/william-suspects-conspiracy-dodi-fayeds-father-claims/
  • See also: “Diana Inquest – The Documents The Jury Never Saw”:/news/diana-inquest-the-documents-the-jury-never-saw/
  • See also: “Princess Diana Assassination – 14 Years Of Lies Spies And Cover-Ups”:/news/princess-diana-assassination-14-years-of-lies-spies-and-cover-ups//
  • See also: “Princess Diana And Jorg Haider Assassinated By ‘Boston Brakes’”:/news/princess-diana-and-jorg-haider-assassinated-by-boston-brakes/
  • See also: “Princess Diana Forum Topic”:http://forums.consciousape.com/index.php?showtopic=96
  • See also: “Princess Diana And MI6”:/news/new-evidence-diana-was-murdered-by-mi6/
  • See also: “Political Assassinations”:/discussion-topics/political-assassinations/
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
image sources: “Prison Planet”:http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/january2007/080107diana.jpg â€¢ “Royal Inquest Website”:www.scottbaker-inquests.gov.uk â€¢ “Cremation Of Care”:http://www.cremationofcare.com/images/diana/express040407.gif


Did former spy and whistleblower Richard Tomlinson retract evidence at Diana Inquest as part of MI6 deal…?

Princess Diana – Richard Tomlinson

Deal Done With MI6
In a dramatic turn of events, former MI6 spy and whistleblower, Richard Tomlinson, who spent more than a decade on the run from MI6, has finally been allowed back into Britain.
MI6 has dropped all charges against its former employee, unfrozen royalties from his whistleblowing book and apologized for its unfair treatment of him. The move comes as speculation mounts that Tomlinson has done a deal with MI6 over what he knows about the spy firm’s involvement in “Princess Diana’s death”:/discussion-topics/political-assassinations/.
In 1999 Richard Tomlinson signed an affidavit stating that MI6 had formulated a plan to assassinate former Serbian leader Slobodan Milosevic in a road traffic accident identical to the one which killed “Princess Diana”:/news/princess-diana-assassination-12th-anniversary-a-peoples-inquiry/ in August 1997.
He told the French Inquiry into Diana’s death that he believed MI6 was involved in the princess’s murder and that MI6 agents used a special forces-style ‘strobe gun’ to blind chauffeur Henri Paul moments before he crashed.
Tomlinson also blew the whistle on two ‘undeclared’ MI6 officers stationed in Paris on the night of the crash and disclosed that he had seen MI6 documents revealing Henri Paul as a part-time MI6 agent.
But in a stunning, last-minute U-turn at the Royal Inquest into Diana’s death last year, Tomlinson mysteriously retracted his claims and has more recently, during secret negotiations with MI6 officers in Spain, also agreed to keep shtum about his knowledge of MI6 operations and in particular about the death of Princess Diana.
In return, Tomlinson no longer faces the threat of prosecution and imprisonment.

Princess Diana – Richard Tomlinson

MI6 Agents
As well as identifying Henri Paul as a part-time MI6 agent, Tomlinson also disclosed other information to the French Inquiry.
Perhaps his most startling disclosure was that well-known French paparazzo, James Andanson, was also a paid informant of MI6. Andanson made his name taking some of the most famous tabloid photographs of British royals abroad, and was known to have followed Diana and Dodi Fayed to Monaco, St Tropez and Sardinia during the summer of 1997.
And despite official claims to the contrary, it has emerged that he also followed them to Paris on the night of the crash.
Indeed, Andanson boasted to friends that he was in the crash tunnel seconds after Diana’s fatal collision, and that he took ‘compromising’ photographs of the wreckage and immediate aftermath which he planned to publish in a book.
For the record, Andanson also owned a white Fiat Uno identical to the one involved the crash.
A statement from Richard Tomlinson’s 1999 affidavit reads:
“One of the “paparazzi” photographers who routinely followed the Princess of Wales was a member of “UKN”, a small corps of part-time MI6 agents who provide miscellaneous services to MI6, such as surveillance and photography expertise.”
Richard Tomlinson, former MI6 Officer, 1999.
Whether the paparazzo alluded to by Tomlinson was indeed James Andanson has never been formerly established. Whether the white Fiat Uno involved in the crash belonged to James Andanson, ditto.
And neither do we know the precise nature of the photographs Andanson took in the crash tunnel in the immediate aftermath—prior to the arrival of the emergency services.
But what we do know is that, in May 2000, Andanson’s entire photographic archive was stolen by an ‘armed gang’ from his offices at the Sipa Press Agency in Paris. We also know this:
A few days prior to the armed break-in, the French police announced that James Andanson had been found dead in his burnt-out car, 400 miles from where he should have been.
His car was locked from the inside. The keys were never found. He was discovered with a bullet hole in his head. His death was officially ruled as ‘suicide’.

Princess Diana – Richard Tomlinson

Undeclared MI6 Officers In Paris
 In their groundbreaking book, “Princess Diana: The Evidence”:/news/new-evidence-diana-was-murdered-by-mi6/, authors Jon King and John Beveridge recently added fuel to the fire when they revealed evidence of an MI6 assassination technique known as the “Boston brakes”:/news/princess-diana-and-jorg-haider-assassinated-by-boston-brakes/, effectively an assassination technique made to look like a ‘road traffic accident’.
Like Tomlinson, the authors cited other instances where the “Boston brakes”:/news/princess-diana-assassination-12th-anniversary-a-peoples-inquiry/ technique had be employed.
They also cast further light on the deal agreed between Tomlinson and MI6. Speaking of the Operation Paget Report, which published the findings of the British investigation into Diana’s death, King and Beveridge stated:
“While Diana is presented in the report as a paranoid neurotic who spends most of her time glancing back over her shoulder for signs of a government hit man, or an MI6 ‘mechanic’ intent on fixing her brakes, Richard Tomlinson is quite incontestably cast as a liar. We struggle to imagine what he must have been threatened with (or promised in return for completely changing his story), but virtually every word he has ever written or uttered regarding MI6 involvement in Diana’s death can now be pretty much discounted.”
Later in the book, King and Beveridge go on to reveal the following:
“A British Embassy leak reported that, on the night itself, there were at least six MI6 agents in Paris—more than comprise the entire (official) number of MI6 agents in Moscow.
“To add to this, former MI6 Officer Richard Tomlinson has told us that, not only was there an unusually high number of MI6 personnel in Paris on the night in question, but that those personnel included MI6 Chief David Spedding’s personal secretary.
“And what is more—in a statement released on 12th May 1999—Tomlinson revealed that, on the night Diana died, two senior MI6 Officers were in Paris on an “undeclared” basis, and that their directive was to liaise with MI6 informant, Henri Paul.
“Mr Tomlinson stated: ‘In Paris at the time of M. Paul’s death, there were two relatively experienced but undeclared MI6 officers. The first was Mr. Nicholas John Andrew LANGMAN, born 1960. The second was Mr. Richard David SPEARMAN, again born in 1960. I firmly believe that either one or both of these officers will be well acquainted with M. Paul, and most probably also met M. Paul shortly before his death. I believe that either or both of these officers will have knowledge that will be of crucial importance in establishing the sequence of events leading up to the deaths of M. Paul, Dodi Al Fayed and the Princess of Wales.’
“Further: ‘Mr Spearman in particular was an extremely well connected and influential officer because he had been, prior to his appointment in Paris, the personal secretary to the Chief of MI6, Mr. David SPEDDING. As such, he would have been privy to even the most confidential of MI6 operations. I believe that there may well be significance in the fact that Mr. Spearman was posted to Paris in the month immediately before the deaths.’”

Princess Diana – Richard Tomlinson

MI6 Spy’s Home Raided
And here’s the sting, again extracted from Princess Diana: The Evidence by Jon King and John Beveridge:
“In relation to these claims made by Richard Tomlinson, we should note an incident that occurred in July 2006…
…On July 3rd, 2006, the Daily Express carried the following front-page headline:
DIANAARREST DRAMA—Ex-MI6 Spy’s Home Is Raided.
The accompanying story proceeded to claim that the raid was “linked to the Princess Diana inquiry”, and revealed that the former MI6 spy in question was none other than Richard Tomlinson.
Evidently, the story revealed, agents from the French security service (DST), at the request of MI6, ransacked Tomlinson’s home in southern France and confiscated telephone and computer equipment, together with his personal organizer, personal papers and files (including his bank account details), and perhaps more to the point, both his passports, as well (Tomlinson bears duel British and New Zealand nationality).
This action was taken, we were told, because MI6 feared Tomlinson might be called to testify at the Royal Inquest in London, and as a result, information would be revealed implicating MI6 in Diana’s death.”
So there we have it. Whether these raids, together with Tomlinson’s ‘interviews’ with the Paget team, were behind the former spy’s decision to retract his testimony regarding Diana’s death, I’ll leave you to you own conclusions.
But it would certainly seem that Tomlinson’s decision not to pursue his claims against MI6 in relation to Diana’s death – to retract his entire sworn testimony – is the reason he is once again a free man.
One way or another, by threat or free will, Richard Tomlinson has done a deal with MI6 to keep quiet about the truth of Diana’s death. I know what that says to me.
● ● ●
  • See also: “William Suspects Conspiracy, Dodi Fayed’s Father Claims”:/news/william-suspects-conspiracy-dodi-fayeds-father-claims/
  • See also: “Princess Diana Assassination: 14 Years Of Lies Spies And Cover-Ups”:/news/princess-diana-assassination-14-years-of-lies-spies-and-cover-ups/
  • See also: “Princess Diana And Jorg Haider Assassinated By Boston Brakes”:/news/princess-diana-and-jorg-haider-assassinated-by-boston-brakes/
  • See also: “Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s Inquiry”:/news/princess-diana-assassination-a-peoples-inquiry/
  • See also: “Diana Inquest: The Documents The Jury Never Saw”:/news/diana-inquest-the-documents-the-jury-never-saw/
  • See also: “Princess Diana – Political Assassination”:/discussion-topics/political-assassinations/
  • See also: “Princess Diana Forum”:http://forums.consciousape.com/index.php?s=6aa09a1f35157e864864a8fa277d46a9&showforum=25_











Were Princess Diana and Jorg Haider victims of the ‘Boston brakes’?

Princess Diana And Jorg Haider Assassinated By Boston Brakes

By Jon King
Assassinated
When Austria’s far-right political leader, Jorg Haider, died in a car crash last October (2008), rumours that his death was no accident quickly emerged.
Within hours a semi-coherent theory was doing the rounds, suggesting Haider might have been assassinated by Mossad. His imminent appointment as Austria’s chancellor, the theory proposed, was unacceptable to Israel, who perceived Haider as a kind of latter-day Adolf Hitler.
Somewhat predictably, many were quick to jump on these rumours, but not everyone. Personally I was caught somewhere midstream.
While I harboured little ambition to involve myself in the argument publicly, I couldn’t help but notice that several stark similarities seemed to exist between Haider’s death and that of another, even more famous political icon, one I had come to know only too well: Princess Diana.
For the past eleven years I had been centrally involved in investigating Diana’s death, and had indeed written two books on the subject with my co-author John Beveridge—‘Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence’ (SPIBooks, New York, 2001 hardback), and the more recent and massively updated paperback, ‘Princess Diana: The Evidence’.
As a result of these endeavours I had naturally become familiar with every piece of evidence there is to be had regarding Diana’s death, even the minutest detail.
Which is why I was taken so aback when I stumbled on an article in the “London Times”:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/bronwen_maddox/article4938718.ece, detailing the death of Jorg Haider (see below).

Princess Diana And Jorg Haider Assassinated By Boston Brakes

Correlations
Before I proceed, I should perhaps explain that the reason I became involved in investigating Diana’s death in the first place was due to information I received a week prior to her fatal ‘accident’ in Paris. Not the place here to delve that information—for anyone interested it is all openly detailed in my book.
But the point is that part of the information I received concerned how the media would be primed to respond in the event of Diana’s death—how it is primed to respond in the event of any political assassination. This information turned out to be frighteningly accurate.
With that in mind, I refer you to the following media reports and the correlations they seem to bear, which quite frankly continue to haunt me.
In the days immediately following Princess Diana’s ‘accident’, media reports famously informed us that her car “crashed into a concrete pillar while overtaking another vehicle” (a white Fiat Uno).
We were also told that the “speedometer was stuck at 120 mph”, a claim later proven conclusively incorrect when Mercedes engineers revealed the speedometer was designed to revert to zero on impact.
In any event, check this paragraph taken from the “London Times”:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/bronwen_maddox/article4938718.ecearticle I mentioned above. It was penned just a few days after Haider’s death (my italics).
 â€œThe leader of Austria’s Far Right was driving alone in his black Volkswagen Phaeton on a little-travelled road in southern Austria and crashed into a concrete pillar while overtaking another vehicle. The speedometer of the wrecked sedan was stuck at 142kph (88mph), police said—more than twice the limit for that road.”
This paragraph could so easily have been lifted from reports detailing Diana’s death eleven years earlier. The wording is not only close, it is exact, word-for-word.
And here is something else to think about.

Princess Diana And Jorg Haider Assassinated By Boston Brakes

Drunk At The Wheel
On the news wires the following day I found a Reuters feed (later published in “The Guardian”:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/oct/15/austria-thefarright and the “New York Times”:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/16/world/europe/16austria.html) claiming that Haider was more than “three times over the legal drink-drive limit” when he lost control of his car.
Not many of us would need reminding that this is precisely the lie they tried to hang on Henri Paul, the Ritz security officer and French intelligence agent who was driving the Mercedes in which Princess Diana was killed.
For the record, even though the French and British inquiries both concluded that Henri Paul was drunk at the wheel, the blood sample on which this verdict was based has to this day never been DNA-identified.
In other words, the authorities who reached this conclusion still cannot be certain that the blood tested belonged to Henri Paul, much less that he was ‘drunk at the wheel’, as claimed.
Given that the sample was found also to contain a level of carbon monoxide poisoning sufficient to incapacitate a mountain gorilla, it is even more likely that the blood tested belonged to someone other than Henri Paul.
The official claim that Haider’s blood contained ‘excessive levels of alcohol’, then, should be taken with some caution.
Indeed, one has to wonder if it was Haider’s blood at all.

Princess Diana and Jorg Haider Assassinated By Boston Brakes

No Skid Marks
There is one further correlation I stumbled on in the “Austrian Times”:http://www.austriantimes.at/index.php?id=9073 (October 13th, 2008). The article read:
“Experts say there appears to be no trace Haider tried to avoid the crash once he lost control of his car.”
The article also included a quote from Max Lang, Head Technician with the Austrian Automobile Association (ÖAMTC), who said:
“With crashes like this one there are usually traces of how the driver tried to avoid crashing by steering away from the point of impact to rectify their mistake. Nothing of that can be seen here.
“I don’t think you can explain the accident just with excessive speed.”
What is of note here is that no skid marks revealing any kind of braking or correctional manoeuvre were found at the crash scene, suggesting Haider just ploughed headlong into the ‘concrete pillar’ without trying to brake or make some other attempt to avoid the collision. Strange enough in itself.
But what is even more strange is this precise same ‘skid mark’ anomaly emerged in Diana’s crash investigation as well.
Mysteriously, no skid marks, either from the Mercedes or the Fiat Uno, were found at Diana’s crash scene, suggesting that Henri Paul also failed to brake or make any kind of correctional manoeuvre as he ploughed headlong into the concrete pillar.
This really is very strange. One can only assume from this that neither Henri Paul nor Jorg Haider were in control of their vehicles immediately prior to impact.
So who was?

Princess Diana And Jorg Haider Assassinated By Boston Brakes

The Boston Brakes
According to former SAS officer and world-famous explorer, Sir Ranulph Feinnes, it is not beyond reason that both Princess Diana’s Mercedes and Jorg Haider’s Volkswagen were remotely hijacked.
 In his book, The Feather Men, Feinnes recounts in some detail a highly sophisticated assassination technique which he says has been employed by the world’s intelligence agencies for decades.
A microchip transceiver, he explains, is fitted to the target vehicle’s on-board computer, allowing the vehicle to be controlled remotely.
He says this technique was first deployed by the CIA in Boston, hence its name: the ‘Boston brakes’.
Feinnes also recounts an instance of the ‘Boston brakes’ being successfully deployed in England in 1986, which resulted in the assassination of SAS Major, Michael Marman, and the near-death of a former equerry to the Queen, Sir Peter Horsley.
According to Sir Ranuplh Feinnes, the ‘Boston brakes’ is all fact, no fiction.
Certainly evidence John and I present in our new book “Princess Diana The Evidence”:/news/new-evidence-diana-was-murdered-by-mi6/ shows clearly enough that Diana was almost certainly the victim of the ‘Boston brakes’.
And given the startling correlations presented above, one has to wonder if Jorg Haider might also have suffered this same premeditated fate.
● ● ●
  • See also: “William Suspects Conspiracy, Dodi Fayed’s Father Claims”:/news/william-suspects-conspiracy-dodi-fayeds-father-claims/
  • See also: “Princess Diana Assassination: A People’s Inquiry”:/news/princess-diana-assassination-a-peoples-inquiry/
  • See also: “Princess Diana Assassination – 14 Years Of Lies, Spies And Cover-Ups”:/news/princess-diana-assassination-14-years-of-lies-spies-and-cover-ups//
  • See also: “New Evidence Diana Was Murdered By MI6”:/news/new-evidence-diana-was-murdered-by-mi6/
  • See also: “Diana Inquest: The Documents The Jury Never Saw”:/news/diana-inquest-the-documents-the-jury-never-saw/
  • See also: “Political Assassinations”:/discussion-topics/political-assassinations/
  • See also: “Princess Diana Forum Topic”:http://forums.consciousape.com/index.php?showtopic=96
image source: main photo Princess Diana Inquest jorg haider phot by Dieter Zirnig at sugarmelon.com published under terms of Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 2.0

comment


  1. Web Forms
Keith Allen

[2011 May] Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see  Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.
Questions: Keith Allen's film explores the series of delays that have never been properly explained



Unlawful Killing
a video/film by Keith Allen

[2011 May] Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see  Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.



Diana  [film] Unlawful Killing

The director of a controversial Diana documentary says: There was a sinister conspiracy but it began AFTER the crash

12th May 2011
Calm down dears, it’s only a documentary.
The outrage generated by the announcement that Unlawful Killing (my film about the inquest into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed) is to be screened in Cannes today has been so heated that I’m fully expecting the phone to ring, and my daughter Lily to say to me: ‘Dad, what have you been up to this time? Are you halfway between East Ham and Upney? Are you Barking?’
I’ve even been attacked in this newspaper by the redoubtable A.N. Wilson, who expressed utter contempt for anyone who believes that Diana’s death might have been anything other than an accident.
That struck me as odd, because I’m an avid reader of his work, and remember that on September 8, 2009, while reviewing the memoirs of Michael Mansfield QC (the barrister who represented Mohamed Al Fayed at the inquest), he wrote: ‘Mansfield has persuaded me that, as a matter of fact, there is something extremely fishy about the death of Princess Diana in the Paris underpass.’
Or perhaps that was another A.N. Wilson?
What’s caused the most heat this week is the inclusion of a photograph of Diana, taken shortly after the crash. I’ve been accused of cheap sensationalism (and worse), and Mohamed Al Fayed has also been attacked, even though he’s just a backer who had nothing to do with the editorial decision to include it.
Incidentally, the only reason I needed a private backer at all was because, even though the inquest was the longest and most significant in British history, not one UK broadcaster would commission a documentary about it from me.
Usually I can get programmes commissioned without undue difficulty, but Channel 4, Channel 5, Sky, and many others all stared blankly when we suggested the idea.
And when my producer proposed (over lunch with the Director General) that the BBC might commission an investigative documentary about how the media had covered the inquest, and about how the coroner had conducted it (especially his extraordinary reluctance to call senior royals as witnesses, even though Diana had left letters stating that the Windsors were planning a car “accident” for her), the refusal was so powerful that it almost took the enamel off his teeth.
Questions: Keith Allen's film explores the series of delays that have never been properly explained
Questions: Keith Allen's film explores the series of delays that have never been properly explained
Anyway, before I get that call from Lily, let me explain why the producers and I decided to include that photograph. And I’ll rehearse the arguments in front of the toughest audience of them all: Daily Mail readers.
The photo is not used in the film for the purpose of shock. It is included as evidence, because it shows clearly that, although Diana had been injured in the crash, she was alert and very much alive. I repeat: it is not a picture of a dying woman.
As medical evidence presented at the inquest confirmed, if Diana had been taken promptly to hospital by Dr Jean-Marc Martino, she could well have survived.
Instead, due to a series of delays that have never been properly explained, it took one hour and 43 minutes to get her to a hospital just a couple of miles away, by which time her life was ebbing away.
We briefly use one photograph as part of a sequence which asks: why was she not taken to hospital more quickly? What took place within Dr Martino’s ambulance (inside which she remained for well over an hour)? Why is Dr Martino’s evidence greatly at variance with the known facts? And why did no official inquiry ever interview (or even name) most of other people in the ambulance?
Surely, if the inquest and police enquiries were as ‘thorough’ and ‘open’ as the voices of authority insist, that is the very least they would have done?
My film is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but about a conspiracy after the crash, culminating in a six-month inquest which (it is my contention) sought to bury the truth, rather than reveal it. I don’t know whether I’ll convince you or not, but I hope you’ll reserve judgement until you have seen it for yourselves.
Admittedly, that’s difficult at the moment, because the film cannot be shown in the UK (mainly because the questions it asks about the conduct of the coroner and police chiefs could lead to us all being imprisoned under contempt of court laws). But it will soon be showing widely throughout the world, so many of you will be able to see it elsewhere.
 
Accusations: Keith Allen denies he is trying to make money out of a much-loved woman's death
Accusations: Keith Allen denies he is trying to make money out of a much-loved woman's death
One final point. I’ve been accused of seeking to make money out of a much-loved woman’s death by making this documentary. That accusation is cheap, untrue and unworthy of those who make it.
I knew that I would be taking some flak by going public, but I made this film because I believe (as privately does A.N. Wilson and most of the British public) that there is something extremely fishy about Diana’s death, and that we have all been lied to by the authorities.
Frankly, if it was simply money I was after, then I wouldn’t have spent three long years making a documentary. I’d simply have signed up for another lucrative Hollywood blockbuster, or spent another three months in a forest in Hungary, pretending to be the Sheriff of Nottingham.
After all, my legs look lovely in tights.

Diana  [film] Unlawful Killing

Al-Fayed funded Diana movie alleges Prince Phillip is a 'Fred West-style psychopath' and labels Royal Family 'gangsters in tiaras'

14th May 2011
The Royal Family masterminded the car crash that caused Princess Diana’s death as a ‘warning’ to make her toe the line, a controversial new film premiered at Cannes yesterday claims.
The director, Keith Allen, said the House of Windsor had ‘got away with murder’ because no one had been held to account over the accident.
In the film, entitled Unlawful Killing, Prince Phillip is branded a 'Fred West-style psychopath' who 'orchestrated the murder' of Diana.
The Queen is dismissed as a 'gangster in a tiara'.
 Controversial: Keith Allen's new movie Unlawful Killing looks into Princess Diana's death and brands Prince Phillip a 'Fred West-style psychopath'
Controversial: Keith Allen's new movie Unlawful Killing looks into Princess Diana's death and brands Prince Phillip a 'Fred West-style psychopath'
Allen, who is trying to sell the film around the world, was bankrolled by  
Mohamed Al-Fayed, whose son Dodi also died in the car crash, to make the movie.
He invested £2.5 million to back the production after it was turned down by every broadcaster in the UK.
It will not be shown in UK cinemas because of strict laws on libel and contempt, but Allen believes the movie will make money in America.
'The crash was supposed to be a warning': Diana died in 1997
'The crash was supposed to be a warning': Diana died in 1997
Allen said: ‘I think Diana was in a position to rock a lot of boats. I think [the accident] was supposed to be a warning.
‘I believe there was a chance that she could have survived the accident. But I think the situation may have gone too far.'
In the film, the inquest in to her death is presented as a cover-up in which different arms of the British establishment - including the police, the Courts, and the Royal Family - as well as the French coroner and government had a hand.
Unlawful Killing opens with a details of a letter penned by Diana to her Butler, in which she claims that Prince Charles is planning to have her murdered in a car accident.
The production stated the 36-year-old could have been saved had she been taken to hospital quickly - and that the inquest failed to properly investigate why she wasn’t.
The film shows the graphic black and white close-up of Diana taken moments after the Mercedes carrying the couple crashed in a Paris underpass, for a few seconds.
The image, in which her blonde hair and features clearly visible, has never been publicly seen in this UK.
Allen said: ‘The photo is not used in the film for the purpose of shock. It is included as evidence, because it shows clearly that, although Diana had been injured in the crash, she was alert and very much alive. I repeat: it is not a picture of a dying woman.’
The film features Al-Fayed accusing the Royal Family of being racist.
Allen, who authors the documentary, suggests in it that the Establishment was unhappy with Diana’s relationship with Dodi, because he was a Muslim.
It also claims that her role in the anti-landmine campaign put her at risk from those in the arms industry, and those in power who had links to it.
'Gangsters in tiaras': The hugely controversial documentary makes some bold claims about the Royal Family's involvement in the accident
'Gangsters in tiaras': The hugely controversial documentary makes some outrageous claims about the Royal Family's involvement in the accident
Psychologist Oliver James is interviewed about his behaviour for the film - and despite having never treated the Duke of Edinburgh, he claims he displays classic ‘psychopath’ behaviour, likening him to a 'Fred West'.
In another bizarre sequence the House of Windsor is compared to the mafia, and Allen describes one picture of the Queen, Princess Margaret and Princess Anne all dressed in black as ‘gangsters in tiaras’.
The controversial premiere was met with ridicule from critics with many questioning how editorially independent the film could be when it was funded by Al-Fayed.
Writer Martyn Gregory, who penned Diana: The Last Days the last days, branded the the film ‘ludicrous’ and claimed that Allen had simply made a vehicle for Al-Fayed’s rants.
Crash: The wreck of the car in which Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed died in Paris
Crash: The wreck of the car in which Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed died in Paris
Critic Richard Friedman compared the ideas put forward in the film as like Mel Gibson in Conspiracy Theory.
He said: ‘It is misleading not to let the audience know that Al-Fayed is funding this film.’
Unlawful Killing features interviews with Piers Morgan, Lauren Booth, and Tony Benn.
Allen enlisted the help of freelance journalist Richard Wiseman, who went undercover to monitor how the press covered the tribunal.
However the only insight he gained was that the BBC’s Royal Correspondent Nicholas Witchell fell asleep during some of it.
Publicity: Allen and writer Paul Sparks attended the photocall in Cannes yesterday, but Mohamed Al-Fayed was absent
Publicity: Allen and writer Paul Sparks attended the photocall in Cannes yesterday, but Mohamed Al-Fayed was absent
The comedian said that he made the film to highlight the failings in the way he believed the death of Diana was investigated.
News of his documentary had been met with disgust with many close to Diana.
Close friend Rosa Monckton said: ‘The fact people are trying to make money – which is all that they are doing now – out of her death is quite frankly ... words fail me.’
A spokesman for St James’s Palace declined to comment.
Al-Fayed did not turn up for the screening amid rumours he was upset about the inclusion of the controversial crash picture.
His spokesman said he was 'delighted with the film' but it is understood that the tycoon had lobbied for the image to be taken out.
In 2008, after a six-month inquest, a jury concluded Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed were unlawfully killed as a direct result of grossly negligent driving by drunk chauffeur Henri Paul, who also died in the crash.

[2011 May] Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see  Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.

Diana  [film] Unlawful Killing

Unlawful Killing – the film the British won't get to see

My documentary about the Diana inquest will be shown everywhere but the UK. Here's why
7 May 2011
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/may/07/unlawful-killing-film-you-wont-see
The internet is a global lavatory wall, a Rabelaisian mixture of truth, lies, insanity and humour. I felt its power and madness this week, when an excerpt from my new film, Unlawful Killing, was leaked on to YouTube and seized on by US conspiracy theorists, who immediately began claiming that the CIA had murdered Princess Diana, thereby allowing others to dismiss my documentary as mad.
Deriding its critics as mad is an age-old British establishment trick. My "inquest of the inquest" film contains footage of Diana recalling how the royals wanted her consigned to a mental institution, and the inquest coroner repeatedly questioning the sanity of anyone who wondered if the crash was more than an accident. His chief target was Mohamed Al Fayed, a man I once profiled for a Channel 4 documentary. Before I met him, I'd half-believed the media caricature of him as a madman, driven nuts by the death of his son, and wildly accusing the Windsors of having planned the 1997 crash. However, I found a man who was sane and funny but frustrated that Britain wouldn't hold an inquest into his son's death. Michael Mansfield QC thought it unfair too, and fought for one to be held; which was why the longest inquest in British legal history eventually began in 2007.
Long before the inquest started, the eminently sane Mansfield had persuaded me that there were suspicious circumstances surrounding the crash, and signs of a cover-up by the authorities. Many journalists agreed, but as the inquest drew near, I noticed that British newspapers (several of which had regularly run "Was Diana Murdered?" pieces) suddenly fell into line, and started insisting that the inquest was a waste of time. They raised no protest when virtually all the key French witnesses refused to participate, nor did they find it odd that not one senior royal was ordered to appear, even though Diana had stated in a lawyer's note that the Windsors were planning an "accident" to her car. Nor did they raise the issue of possible bias when legal proceedings involving the integrity of the royal family were to be heard in the royal courts of justice before a coroner who'd sworn an oath of allegiance to the Queen.
I felt the need to raise it, so I asked every major UK broadcaster (BBC, ITV, C4, Five, Sky) to commission a TV documentary about the inquest. But they refused even to contemplate such a suggestion, so Associated Rediffusion and I began filming and financing it ourselves. Shortly before the inquest began, Fayed offered to fund our project, so we could make a feature-length cinema documentary instead. We agreed, on condition that we would report events in the way we saw them, and the deal was struck.
Unlawful Killing is not about a conspiracy before the crash, but a provable conspiracy after the crash. A conspiracy organised not by a single scheming arch-fiend, but collectively by the British establishment – judges, lawyers, politicians, police chiefs, secret services, even newspaper editors – all of whom have been appointed to their positions because they are "a safe pair of hands". Just as compass needles all point north without being told to, so these people instinctively know what is expected of them when the state's interests are under threat and they act accordingly, quietly suppressing uncomfortable evidence or undermining the credibility of witnesses whose evidence contradicts the official narrative.
Consider just a fraction of what transpired. Over 100 significant witnesses were not called to the inquest, or refused to appear. Blood tests allegedly proving the drunkenness of the driver Henri Paul were deemed "biologically inexplicable" by a toxicologist. A British crash expert found that Diana's seat belt had not been working. And so on.
Strangest of all was the media coverage of the verdict. Inquest evidence showed conclusively that the crash was caused by an unidentified white Fiat Uno and several unidentified motorcycles, vehicles that were certainly not paparazzi, because uncontested police evidence confirmed that the paparazzi were nowhere near the tunnel at the time of the crash. The jury understood this, bringing in a verdict of "unlawful killing" by unidentified "following vehicles"; yet within seconds, the BBC was misreporting that the jury had blamed the paparazzi, and the rest of the media meekly followed suit. Which is why – three years on – barely anyone realises what the jury's troubling verdict really was.
Why is the film being premiered next week at Cannes, three years after the inquest ended? Because British lawyers insisted on 87 cuts before any UK release could be contemplated. So rather than butcher the film, or risk legal action, we're showing it in France, then the US, and everywhere except the UK. Pity, because at a time when the mindless sugar rush of the royal wedding has been sending British Rrepublicans into a diabetic coma, it could act as a welcome antidote.



















15 years after her death new evidence has emerged that Diana was murdered by MI6 ‘Boston brakes’…

New Evidence Diana Was Murdered By MI6

By Richard Coleman
The ‘Boston Brakes’
Fifteen years after her death, new evidence has emerged that Princess Diana was murdered in an MI6-organized ‘Boston brakes’ operation.
Following the 2008 Royal Inquest debacle, which ruled out MI6 involvement in Diana’s death, new evidence has come to light which challenges the ‘official verdict’.
 In their book, Princess Diana: The Evidence , authors Jon King and John Beveridge present evidence that a highly sophisticated assassination technique was used to cause the princess’s vehicle to crash as it drove through the Alma tunnel, Paris, in the early hours of August 31st, 1997.
The ‘Boston brakes’, they reveal, is the most favoured assassination technique employed by the West’s intelligence services due to its deniability.
The authors were able to compile such a detailed and compelling case due to information gleaned from their well-placed intelligence and security contacts-mostly former special and elite forces members, mercenaries, royal bodyguards, and on occasion, hired assassins.
Some of these crack military contractors disclosed details of prior operations in which the ‘Boston brakes’ had been successfully used. Others, who fought in Angola, site of Diana’s landmines campaign, threw light on the secret oil and diamond wars still raging in central Africa, and in particular the dirty arms-for-oil deals carried out by MI6, FrenchDGSE, the CIA and the Bush-Cheney oil syndicate.
By focusing the light of the world’s media on Angola, the authors were told, the princess was in danger of exposing these deals, and was thus placing herself “in grave danger”. The fact that she was compiling a dossier containing the names of high-powered British politicians and businessmen involved in the deals, ditto.
It should be noted that, for obvious reasons, some of the sources quoted in the book remain anonymous. But many are named.

New Evidence Diana Was Murdered By MI6

The SAS And The Clinic
Speaking of the ‘Boston brakes’ operation which he believed killed Princess Diana, former SAS sergeant, Dave Cornish, exclusively revealed:
“From the minute the decoy car left the Ritz to the moment the tail car closed in … it was obvious what was going down. Anyone who knows what they’re talking about’ll tell you the same.”
And former Royal bodyguard, Mike Grey, added:
“The operation bore all the classic hallmarks of a security service assassination …. I have no doubts whatsoever, given my twenty years experience in various sections of the security industry, that Diana was assassinated. The security service hallmarks are plain to see.”
But it was former SAS officer and world-famous explorer, Sir Ranulph Fiennes, who offered perhaps the most telling revelation of all.
The ‘Boston brakes’ method of assassination, Fiennes reveals, has been in use since at least the 1980s, and deploys a microchip transceiver which takes over the target vehicle’s steering and brakes at the critical moment.
The method, he says, was first deployed by the CIA in Boston, hence the name. But it has since been adopted by intelligence and security forces the world over, as well as by private security firms and their hit squads.
Fiennes also confirms that the death by ‘road traffic accident’ of SAS Major Michael Marman in England in 1986 was the result of a Boston brakes operation carried out by a private hit squad known as The Clinic.

New Evidence Diana Was Murdered By MI6

The Attempt To Assassinate Camilla
Further instances of the Boston brakes in action are also cited in the book, including the death by ‘road traffic accident’ of Diana’s former lover and bodyguard, Barry Mannakee, in 1987, and – staggeringly – the attempted assassination by ‘road traffic accident’ of Camilla Parker Bowles just two months prior to Diana’s own fatal crash.
The story of this never-before-disclosed incident is recounted in some detail in the book.
According to sources quoted by the authors, the attempt on Camilla Parker Bowles’s life was the result of a “constitutional crisis” engendered by Prince Charles’s desire to marry his long-term lover while Diana was still alive.
According to Tony Wright, then parliamentary aide to the Lord Chancellor, the crisis was so severe it almost resulted in the disestablishment of the Church (see The Independent).
As the authors point out, such a move would have amounted to the biggest, most far-reaching constitutional reforms since Henry VIII. And we all know what happened to his wives…

New Evidence Diana Was Murdered By MI6

Seat Belt “Jammed In The Retracted Position”
Other revelations in the book include an interview with a well-known Harley Street specialist [named in the book] who became Diana’s nutritional guru.
Fearing she might have been pregnant, the authors reveal, Diana visited her nutritional guru for dietary advice prior to her final holiday with Dodi Fayed. Following her visit the specialist’s Harley Street clinic was broken into and his computer stolen.
And there are many other fresh concerns raised in this uncompromising cross-examination of the ‘accident theory’, in which the authors assume the roles of prosecuting counsels in what is effectively a ‘people’s inquiry’.
Not least among these concerns is the anomaly surrounding Diana’s seat-belt, which, the authors reveal, was found by the Operation Paget team to have been “jammed in the retracted position” and thus unusable – a fact, like so many others, brushed aside by the Royal Inquest.
Other challenges to the ‘accident theory’ include:
  • Grave concerns over the coroner’s decision to ignore crucial evidence regarding landmines;
  • The true identity of certain members of the paparazzi;
  • The Metropolitan Police cover-up of Diana’s recorded statements about perceived threats on her life;
  • Recorded communications between Diana, Prince Charles and Prince Philip;
  • Concerns about Diana’s illegal embalming, which the authors discover was carried out on the orders of a very high-ranking British ‘diplomat’ [named in the book] who was stationed at the British Embassy in Paris on the night of the crash;
  • The ‘bullet hole’ found in paparazzo James Andanson’s head, discovered and reported by Police Chief Jean-Michel Lauzun at the scene of the MI6 agent’s mysterious ‘suicide’;
  • And Henri Paul’s spurious blood sample – on which the inquest’s verdict was ultimately based – which, the authors reveal, was never DNA-identified, was taken from a vial labelled “unknown male” and contained a level of carbon monoxide so excessive six of the world’s most eminent forensic pathologists stated under oath that it could not possibly have belonged to Henri Paul.

New Evidence Diana Was Murdered By MI6

Also In ‘Princess Diana – The Evidence’
  • An unforgiving expose on the “wholly flawed and contrived” Royal Inquest;
  • A comprehensive, 60,000-word critique of Lord Stevens’ Operation Paget investigation;
  • An extensive dossier on the mismanagement of the French Inquiry;
  • Plus compelling evidence of a plot to assassinate Diana dating back to November 1995.
Incredibly, Princess Diana: The Evidence also reveals foreknowledge of a prime-target assassination being planned by MI6 one week prior to Diana’s fatal crash.

For more on ‘The Book the British Government Tried To Ban!’ watch author Jon King’s interview here:



Princess Diana Evidence of Assassination: Jon King on Edge Media TV



princess_diana_july_22_2011















Top Met Police officers wanted for questioning over allegations that they withheld crucial evidence about the car crash which killed Princess Diana…

Princess Diana Police Face Arrest

By “Cyril Dixon, Padraic Flanagan and Mark Reynolds ● Express”:http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/260394
TWO of Britain’s leading former police officers are wanted for questioning over allegations that they withheld crucial evidence about the car crash which killed Princess Diana.
A French judge wants to ask ex-Yard chief Lord Condon and Sir David Veness why they failed to disclose the existence of a note in which she predicted her assassination.
They could face international arrest warrants as suspects should they refuse to attend interviews in Paris, sources close to the investigation indicated last night.
The note, taken by Diana’s lawyer Lord Mishcon, was handed to the officers a few months after the 1997 Paris tunnel crash which also claimed the lives of Diana’s boyfriend Dodi Fayed, son of tycoon Mohamed Al Fayed, and the pair’s chauffeur Henri Paul.
The highly-respected lawyer’s document records the line: “Efforts would be made if not to get rid of her (be it by some accident in her car, such as a pre-prepared brake failure or whatever)…at least to see that she was so injured or damaged as to be declared unbalanced.”
It was more than three years later before it emerged that the officers had locked the note in Lord Condon’s safe at Scotland Yard. When Lord Condon stood down as the Metropolitan Police Commissioner his successor as Met Commissioner, Lord Stevens, continued to keep its existence a secret.
Under French law, “removing or concealing” evidence, which could “facilitate the discovery of a crime”, is punishable by three to five years in jail or a fine.
Now Paris-based Judge Gerard Caddeo is locked in a protracted battle with British authorities over his demand for interviews with Lord Condon and Sir David, a former assistant commissioner.
The explosive development means that the issue of whether the fatal crash in the Pont de l’Alma tunnel in Paris was an accident or murder is likely to be once more the subject of a controversial court case.
“Read Full Article HERE…”:http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/260394
● ● ●

Watch Jon King’s interview on Princess Diana assassination…

● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●














Royal Inquest website taken down and Diana Memorial Trust to close in 2014 – all part of the ongoing cover-up says John Morgan…

Princess Diana: Is Her Memory Being Airbrushed Out?

By John Morgan
Just weeks after what would have been Princess Diana’s 50th birthday, the Diana Memorial Fund announced that, after operating for only 14 years, it will be closing down in 2012.
Now, in a new development, the official website for the Scott Baker Inquest into her death has been effectively removed from public view.
A spokesman from the Royal Courts of Justice (RCJ) has stated that the Princess Diana inquest website has been closed down: “In line with UK government moves to decrease the number of .gov.uk websites and addresses, the Inquest site URL was not renewed this year.”
Although the spokesman went on to say that “the site will remain permanently available via the National Archives website”, there has been no automatic redirection set up to the new site. It is normal practice for a redirection to be placed when a website on the internet is shifted, but this has not occurred in the case of the Diana inquest website – despite repeated requests to officials at the RCJ.
When the RCJ was initially told about this, two weeks ago, a spokesman replied: “Thanks for pointing this out to us. We will arrange for a redirect to the National Archive url.”
After nothing happened, the RCJ was asked how long it would take for the problem to be remedied. We were then told by a spokesman from the Judicial Communications Office: “I will look into this again, however given the current government pressure to reduce websites and URLs I’m not certain we will be able to reinstate this URL link.”
No one has ever asked the RCJ to reinstate the website – all that is required is a simple redirection from the old website address.
Since then nothing has been done, even though just a click on a mouse at the RCJ would solve the problem.
It has also been discovered that a person searching on Google is unable to find the new Diana inquest website. Google was promptly notified. That was a fortnight ago, yet Google have ignored this problem and have done nothing to enable internet users to locate the buried Diana inquest.
It then turned out that a search on the National Archives (NA) website will also not reveal the existence of the Diana inquest. Instead the searcher is advised: “Access Conditions: Records Not Yet Transferred”.
The NA was asked about this and their spokesman replied: “We will … be updating our web archive search … in the coming weeks”.
Paul Sparks, the co-writer and co-producer of the controversial new film “Unlawful Killing”:http://www.consciousape.com/news/unlawful-killing-film-the-british-wont-get-to-see/ â€“ shown recently at both the Cannes and Galway festivals – said: “To allay suspicions of a cover-up, the British Establishment promised that the Diana inquest proceedings would remain available to the public in perpetuity, so that people could see they had nothing to hide. Yet now, after only three years … the inquest web site has disappeared into the recesses of the National Archives, where not even Google – or the National Archives’ own search engine – is able to locate it. Coincidence? Or yet another example of the ongoing non-attributable cover-up that the British Establishment has been engaged in for the past fourteen years?”
With recent books exposing the incredible level of cover-up by British authorities surrounding the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed, and the imminent worldwide – except UK – release of Unlawful Killing, the question is now being asked: Is this effort by the British Establishment to bury the Diana inquest website a continuation of that cover-up and an attempt to airbrush the memory of Princess Diana’s death out of the public record?
John Morgan
Author of the Diana Inquest series.
Relevant website addresses:
● ● ●

Das Neue, No. 41
Lady Diana was Killed by a Team of Specialists of the British MI-5
WIESBADEN, Oct. 9-- The cover story in issue No. 41, of the German illustrated weekly {Das Neue} hinted. The core of the story is an exclusive interview with "Glyn Jones", a former member of the elite military unit that observed Diana from 1985 to 1989, on orders from the MI-5.
After introducing the theme with a hint that Martine Monteil, the head of the Paris police investigation team, is looking into the case as an assassination case, and that the MI-5 is a suspect, Das Neue asks Jones about his 1985-1989 mission. He relates that he was with the "Royal Marines", then, and was operating upon directives coming from MI-5.
The job of his team "was not to spy on members of the Royal Family. Foreign agencies warned the MI-5 at that time, that there was a threat to Diana. That is why she was surveilled." "That implied: We would have had to kill her, if we were not able to prevent an abduction."
The main objective of the team was to protect the Royal House, the future King (Diana's son), and the Anglican Church. All of that was threatened by Diana's bad conduct, Jones said. When Das Neue asked, whether the "drunken" driver, Henri Paul, didn't play a role in the accident, Jones said: "Yes, in the end, it was a reason. But why did this accident occur, in the first place? Why is the French police not able to identify those two men, that stood on the bridge above the tunnel, who were firing shots on the car?" "Two shots were fired on the tires.
So far, this has not been made public. They are trying to cover it up." Jones said that traces of the shots would not necessarily be found, because "this depends on the angle at which the bullet hits--this can hardly be checked, if the tire is ripped into pieces.
This, at least, is how it is done in anti-terror measures in Northern Ireland, when any outside implication is to be covered up." Jones said that it is not French sloppiness which prevents a real investigation in Paris, but that it rather implies that "the French secret service is collaborating with the British secret service.
There are close contacts... [I]t would not be in the interest of the French government to let such things get out to the public." The interview was accompanied by a box, which explained how the sniper attack on Di's car could have occurred.
First of all, the British SAS is equipped with a special gun, the "Five-Seven" which is produced by the French firm, FN Herstal. This is an ultralight weapon, which works like a "heavy gun," however, because its ammunition can cut through steel and bullet-proof vests, from 200 meters away.
The special bullets, which have a weight of only 2 grams each, leave no visible tracks in the target.
Weapons expert "Bernard Sacrez" explained to Das Neue that "with this weapon, you can slice the tires of a car as if you used a razor blade. No tracks of the shot can be located, because the two-gram bullet disassembles completely, afterwards."
Al Fayed's security team included 8 former SAS agents, by the way, the Das Neue report said. Dodi's bodyguard Alexander Wingfield was one of them, and he switched shift with Trevor Rees-Jones (the body-guard that survived) that night. "Glyn Jones" said it looks like an orchestration, because the drivers also switched shifts that night.
James Andanson worked for MI6 British Intelligence as an informant
The development could support the theory that Andanson was murdered by the security services.
By Cyril Dixon
THE mystery over Princess Diana’s fatal car crash took another twist yesterday when startling new evidence emerged about the death of a key witness.
The Daily Express has uncovered dramatic new information which undermines the French police claim that photographer James Andanson doused himself and his black BMW with petrol and set himself alight.
Andanson was found dead in his burnt-out car three years after the smash which killed Diana, her lover Dodi Fayed and driver Henri Paul.
Andanson, suspected of causing the crash by driving a white Fiat Uno into their Mercedes, was said officially to have committed suicide.
But investigators have uncovered a receipt which shows that although Andanson, 54, did buy a substantial amount of fuel on the day he died, it was diesel, not petrol.
Unlike petrol, diesel is not highly inflammable at normal temperatures and would not have ignited if he had struck a match.
You would not be able to set light to diesel with a match.
He used his credit card to buy more than 100 litres of diesel on a visit to a hypermarket near Nant, southern France.
Sceptics would say it is far more likely that the experienced paparazzo bought it to fill up his car for the 400-mile journey back to his home in central France.
They would also think it unlikely for him to prepare his car for a long trip if he planned to kill himself just a few miles away.
The development could support the theory that Andanson was murdered by the security services.
Dodi’s father Mohamed Al Fayed believes he was on the intelligence payroll and that he was killed to stop him exposing a plot to assassinate his son and the Princess.
The Harrods owner’s belief is supported by the evidence of a new witness, a policeman, who said he saw what looked like a bullet hole in the dead photographer’s head.
The officer backs up claims by Christophe Pelat, the fireman who discovered the body, that Andanson had been shot in the head.
Two months ago, Pelat said: “I saw him at close range and I’m absolutely convinced that he had been shot in the head.”
Yesterday’s revelation came just days after the police officer who ran the initial inquiry into how Diana died in Paris’s Alma tunnel blamed the Fiat driver.
Jean Claude Mules said he had compelling evidence that the black Mercedes collided with the Fiat seconds before it ploughed into a pillar. He said his officers would have “had their killer” if they had succeeded in tracing the driver.
Andanson was found dead on May 4 2000 in woodland alongside a country road near Nant, in the Aveyron region of France.
He had apparently left his wife Elizabeth, 45, at their farmhouse in Lignieres, 170 miles south of Paris, and driven 400 miles south to Nant.
A police spokesman said at the time: “He took his own life by dousing himself and the car with petrol and then setting light to it.”
But Andanson’s credit card records show he went into a Géant hypermarket just a few miles away from where he was found dead.
He bought more than 100 litres of diesel and spent almost 600 francs.
Investigators are not certain what he did with the fuel. But his BMW 3 series’ saloon would hold only 60 litres and he may have filled up and transported the surplus in cans. Critically, experts say that it is inconceivable that Andanson would buy diesel to set himself alight.
Ray Holloway, of the Petrol Retailers Association, said: “With petrol it is the vapour that is the risk. It’s very different with diesel.
“Diesel is warmed and compressed to make it fire. You wouldn’t be able to set light to diesel with a match. It would just go out.
“The flashpoint for diesel, that is the temperature it would need to get to, is something like 63C.
“You would need to warm diesel up with something like a blow torch to have any hope of igniting it, and even then you wouldprobably have to be in a confined space.
“People often get burned when using petrol because they try setting light to the liquid.   But what happens is the vapour ignites first.”
The riddle of Andanson’s death will be looked at by Lord Justice Scott Baker, the judge appointed to oversee Diana’s inquest. He has produced a list of 20 questions about the accident which most people assumed had been answered but which must now be re-examined.
Andanson, who worked for the Sipa agency, was famous for his celebrity portraits, including one of Greek shipping tycoon Aristotle Onassis on his death-bed.
But he is also rumoured to have been working for the security services. Former MI6 officer Richard Tomlinson once alleged they use the paparazzi because they are good at tracking the whereabouts of high profile “targets”.
In the summer before the accident, when Diana and Dodi cruised the Mediterranean on his father’s yacht Jonikal, they were plagued by paparazzi. Andanson was one of the biggest players on that scene and was never far away from the couple.
Mr Al Fayed believes Diana, 36, and Dodi, 42, were murdered in a conspiracy driven by the Royal Family and carried out by the security services in August 1997.
He claims they had fallen in love after spending the summer together and planned to marry.
Mr Al Fayed claims the Royals objected to their romance because they did not want Prince William to have a stepfather who was non-white and a Muslim.
Diana crash witness: I saw a dozen 'shady figures' in tunnel
Last updated at 23:22pm on 30.09.06
 Jacques Morel
Jacques Morel claims he saw 'shady figures' before Princess Diana's fatal car crash
A key eyewitness to the car crash that killed Princess Diana has broken his silence to tell how he saw a dozen people at the scene moments before her death.
Record producer Jacques Morel, 59, is convinced they expected to see her Mercedes brought to a halt by another car.
Detectives working on the inquiry into Diana's death, headed by former Scotland Yard chief Lord Stevens, considered his account so important that he was flown to London and interviewed for three days.
Mr Morel, who was driving home with his wife Moufida in Paris on the night of August 31, 1997, said: "As we entered the Alma tunnel I looked to my left and saw about a dozen shady figures on a tiny pavement by the side of the opposite carriageway.
"They were all standing in a long line. The sight was unforgettable.
"The pavement is less than 30cm (12in) wide and next to fast traffic. They would have been breathing in petrol fumes and it was very dirty down there. It was certainly not a sensible place to stand around."
If accurate, Mr Morel's recollections are significant because they suggest that the route Diana and Dodi Al Fayed were taking was known in advance.
Until now it has always been thought that chauffeur Henri Paul was following an unexpected route in order to shake off paparazzi photographers.
Mr Morel, who now lives in Tunisia, said: "There was an almighty bang and a great big flash of light. Immediately my wife and I realised there had been a crash.
"My first thought was that those inside the tunnel were connected with what had happened. This thought has never left me.
"We could see a car coming from the opposite direction had gone straight into a pillar. All of the other drivers stopped, so I did too.
"There was a symphony of car horns and then white smoke filled the tunnel. I got out of my car and rushed towards the crash scene.
"I was devastated when I saw the Princess in her white trousers in the back of the car. She was easily recognisable.
"She looked so serene and peaceful, but it was the end. It was one of the most heartbreaking scenes of my life. I will never forget seeing her face.
"Others were lying around Diana and I remember the driver looking as though he had his head in his hands. It was then that I also saw a white Fiat Uno being driven away."
The car was later reported to be registered to James Andanson, a paparazzi photographer who committed suicide in mysterious circumstances in 2000. However, the vehicle has never been found.
Mr Morel, who has written a book about his experiences, told British detectives Philip Easton and Mark Hodges that he believes Paul was in on the plot.
"I am certain he was paid to drive through the Alma tunnel. There was cash in Henri Paul's pocket when he was found dead,' said Mr Morel.
Blood tests revealed that Paul was three times over the French drink-drive limit when the crash took place. Traces of anti-depressant drugs were also found.
The inquiry headed by Lord Stevens, which has taken 1,500 witness statements, is expected to deliver its report by Christmas.
Jeweler Was Told To Lie In Princess Diana Case 

December 6, 2006 - Maira Oliveira - All Headline News Reporter 

London, England (BANG) - A key witness in the inquiry into the death 
of Britain's Princess Diana recently claimed police threatened him to 
change his evidence.
 

Jeweler Alberto Repossi - who claims he sold Diana's lover Dodi Al Fayed  an engagement ring the day before the couple were killed in a car crash 
in Paris on August 31, 1997 - alleges he was put under pressure by  investigators to retract the statement he gave to Lord Stevens, who is 
leading the inquiry. 

There is speculation that investigators did not want evidence that Diana  and Dodi were to become engaged to be made public, as it would fuel 
conspiracy theories championed by Dodi's father Mohammed Al Fayed  that the princess was murdered as part of a secret plot to prevent her 
from marrying a Muslim. 

Repossi told Britain's Daily Express newspaper, "These are things which I  am absolutely certain about. They warned me if anyone lied to Lord 
Stevens - and anyone could include the prime minister or even the secret  service - then he had the power to get people sent to prison. 

He added, "They kept repeating the warnings of the risk to my reputation  and the bad press coverage I would get. But despite all this, I was not 
prepared to change what I'd said before because it was the truth." 

Repossi's testimony - backed up by receipts and CCTV footage - reveals  Dodi and Diana picked a $305,000 emerald and diamond ring from a 
range of engagement bands called "Did-Moi Oui" which means "Tell Me  Yes" at his Monte Carlo jewelry store in August 1997. 

Dodi - the son of Harrods owner, Mohammad Al Fayed - asked for the  ring to be sent to Repossi's Paris branch so he could collect it on August30. 

Repossi said, "
I strongly support any attempt to determine exactly what  caused this terrible tragedy. Until now I thought I could play my part by  co-operating fully with the inquiry. But my treatment during the  interviews has convinced me that they are not interested in establishing 
the truth.


He continued, "My real concern is that attempts were certainly made to  get me to change what I knew to be the truth. I believe they were doing 
this in order to support theories or conclusions they had already arrived  at before they saw me. They only seemed interested in trying to show 
me I was lying." 

The investigation is expected to conclude that the crash was an accident  due to driver Henri Paul being under the influence of alcohol and driving 
over the speed limit. 

http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7005768564
Diana: The 18 missing witnesses in £4m inquiry 

13/12/06 - By John Twomey UK Daily Express 

EIGHTEEN key witnesses have been ignored by the £4million Lord Stevens inquiry into the death of Princess Diana. 

Their evidence to French police had raised several questions about the fatal crash in Paris. 

But detectives working on the three-year inquiry – which will publish its findings tomorrow – didn’t interview them to gather fresh testimony. 

The revelations come after the Daily Express revealed disturbing allegations from a crucial witness in the Diana probe who claimed that British detectives tried to pressure him into changing parts of his evidence. 

The claims by jeweller Alberto Repossi – who insists Diana and Dodi were engaged when they died in the crash – have been dismissed by the Operation Paget squad. 

Lord Stevens’ inquiry was set up to finally discover the truth behind how Princess Diana’s Mercedes, driven by Henri Paul, came to crash in the Alma tunnel in Paris on August 31, 1997. 

Dodi’s father Mohamed Al Fayed has spent the past nine years mounting a determined campaign for the truth, spending millions of pounds uncovering fundamental flaws in the original French inquiry. 

He remains convinced that the pair were murdered in a plot organised by the British Establishment, including the intelligence services. 

One of the many theories put forward is that the Princess’s car was struck by another vehicle as it entered the tunnel under the River Seine. 

And yesterday it emerged that one family which gave detailed statements to French police – but not to their British counterparts – told how they saw two large cars heading at speed towards the Pont de L’Alma underpass in the shadow of the Eiffel Tower. 

Moments later, the vehicles disappeared into the tunnel and the family heard the screeching of brakes, the “scrunching” of metal, a first sickening impact and a louder bang followed by the haunting sound of a jammed horn. 

As the witnesses looked down into the underpass, they saw the wreckage of the Mercedes car which was carrying Diana and Dodi slewed across the carriageway. But there was no sign of the second car. 

The family also told how a taxi, following at a normal distance, stopped at the tunnel entrance but no-one got out. 

They also recalled seeing a mystery man running straight past them and into the tunnel. The family, which has declined to be named, was interviewed by Captain Eric Crosnier of the Paris crime squad shortly after the crash. The family says it has given no other interviews. 

Lord Stevens will present his findings at a press conference to the world’s media tomorrow. 

The former Metropolitan Police Commissioner is understood to have concluded that Diana and Dodi died because their chauffeur Henri Paul was drunk and driving too fast. 

Paul was also killed and Dodi’s bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, was seriously injured but survived. 

Harrods owner Mr Al Fayed suspects British intelligence officers were involved in “organising” the crash and covering up afterwards. 

He fears the deaths were ordered because the Establishment could not bear the thought of the mother of a future king being pregnant with a Muslim’s child. 

Last week, his lawyers forced the former senior judge in charge of the inquest to back down over plans to hold preliminary hearings in private. Lady Butler-Sloss said she was persuaded to reverse her decision because of “strong public interest in the case”. 

But Mr Al Fayed’s victory has only fuelled suspicions that a cover-up is being attempted. 

Statements made by the French family have been backed up by another witness, Clifford Gooroovado, 41. 

He said: “The Mercedes car was driving behind another car. The car in front of the Mercedes was probably running at normal speed. The consequence was that the Mercedes probably accelerated so hard in order to pull out and overtake this car.” 

Grigori Rassinier, who was also near the underpass, said in a statement: “There were a number of cars in the tunnel and it was certainly possible that there was one or more other cars travelling ahead of the Mercedes at the time of the crash.” 

Mr Rassinier said he had been contacted by the Operation Paget squad last year and offered to travel to London to give a statement. But he claims he never heard from them again. 

Last week, the Daily Express revealed how Monte Carlo-based jeweller Mr Repossi alleged he was put under pressure to change his story during lengthy interviews with officers from Lord Stevens’ squad. 

The jeweller claims – backed up by receipts and CCTV footage from his Monaco showroom – that Diana and Dodi picked out a £230,000 emerald and diamond band from a variety of engagement rings in a prestigious range called Dis-Moi Oui – Tell Me Yes. 

Dodi later asked for the ring to be sent to the Repossi store at the Place Vendome in Paris, which the jeweller opened especially so he could visit on August 30 – the day before the crash. 

The fabulous engagement ring was later left at Dodi’s Paris apartment where he had planned to present it to the princess. Detectives from Lord Stevens’ team interviewed Mr Repossi three times and his wife once. 

In the final meeting in July this year, officers told him that the jewellery was not an engagement ring. Mr Repossi said: “They warned me that if anyone lied to Lord Stevens then he had the power to get people sent to prison,” he said. 

“They kept repeating the warnings of the risk to my reputation and the bad press coverage I would get. But despite all this, I was not prepared to change what I’d said before because it was the truth.” 

The inquiry team vehemently denies any attempt to put pressure on any witness to tell anything other than the truth. 

Sources close to Lord Stevens’ investigation yesterday suggested that the 18 witnesses may not have been spoken to because their original statements were perfectly adequate and there was no need to interview them again

http://express.lineone.net/news_detail.html?sku=874
http://www.whale.to/b/deathcrash_paul.html

Death-crash Paul "drank Diet Coke."
04/09/06
A KEY new witness has come forward to confirm that the chauffeur who drove Princess Diana to her death "drank nothing but Diet Coke and the odd beer".

The Daily Express can reveal that 41-year-old Henri Paul, pictured, had started going out with a 25-year-old French-Moroccan girlfriend three weeks before the tragedy.

She has told police: "He was by no means an alcoholic but a decent man who solely enjoyed a social drink like everyone else."

The revelation follows a decision by French legal authorities to reinvestigate the circumstances surrounding Diana
's death after new doubts emerged over blood tests carried out on Paul. 

An original French inquiry concluded that he was high on a lethal cocktail of drink and prescription drugs when he drove a Mercedes into the wall of a Paris underpass, killing himself, Diana, and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed. 

Now, nine years after the crash, it appears all but certain that they got it terribly wrong. It has always been thought that Paul had no girlfriend since he split up with single mother Laurence Pujol, 32, just before the crash. This led to the French portraying Paul as a depressed bachelor who turned to strong spirits to control his mood swings. 

But he was actually at the start of a new relationship with a pretty Moroccan student from Casablanca. The young woman, for whom the French have requested anonymity, had a key to Paul
's flat, regularly slept there and had arranged to see him on the day before his death.

She was with him constantly as he visited bars and restaurants around Paris. Rather than order strong spirits 
 as some claim he chose nothing but beer and soft drinks. 

A French detective said: "She told us Paul had hardly drunk any alcohol and we see no reason to disbelieve her."

The woman enjoyed a first date with Paul in The Borgogne, a Paris bar, in early August 1997. Both drank Coke, although Paul also had a single Pelforth beer. 

The woman did not have any transport home so slept at Paul
's flat, close to the Ritz Hotel, where he was deputy head of security. In a statement to police, the woman revealed that on a later date they again went to The Borgogne. 

She said: "I drank tea and a Devil Mint cocktail and he had a beer or two." She again slept at Paul
's flat but, because it was early in their relationship, there were no sexual relations. She told police: "I also want to tell you that he acted like a very kind man."

Paris criminal brigade commander Jean-Paul Copetti has handed the woman
's statements to British detectives working on Operation Paget, the £4million inquiry into Diana's death. 

The new evidence strengthens the view that Paul
's inebriated state became a convenient cover story to explain away far more sinister goings-on. 

Although French police devoted 20 officers to Paul
's last hours, they found no explanation as to how he allegedly built up 173 milligrammes of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood  three times the legal limit. 

The conspiracy theorists, led by Dodi
's father, Harrods boss Mohamed Al Fayed, believe Diana and his son were murdered by British security services because they were expecting a Muslim baby  something which was not acceptable to the Royal Family.

Author backs Diana conspiracy 

View BBC Video RealPlayer 

Noel Botham is a former Royal correspondent who believes the crash that 
killed Diana, Princess of Wales, was no accident. The author of "The 
Murder of Princess Diana" spoke about the details that aroused his suspicions. 

Noel Botham: 
'The two bodyguards swore that Henri Paul was not drunk when he got in 
the car to drive Diana and Dodi. They said their job would have been on 
the line......' 

The French police checked to see if he’d been drinking in the bars close to 
his home near the hotel. 

Nicholas Davies: 
'There was no single witness come forward to say that he was drinking, 
and we also - we also know that only three days before he had had a 
rigorous pilot’s medical examination and there was no suggestion in that 
that he was a drinker, or a drunkard. ' Henri Paul had been a pilot for 
over 20 years and had clocked up 600 hours of flying time. 

Henri Paul’s blood samples contained unusually high levels of carbon 
monoxide. 

Mohamed Al Fayed: 
‘If you have carbon monoxide of 24% in the blood, you can’t walk, for I 
am certain there is foul play, I am certain it’s not Henri Paul’s blood, and 
straight away…drunken driver…it’s just unbelievable.’ 

Conspiracy theorists now fixed on the idea that the driver’s blood samples 
had been switched. 

Noel Botham: 
‘I was told there were twenty-two people who died in Paris that night 
which were investigable deaths, for one reason or another. One of them 
was a man who drank half a bottle or more of Vodka - who sat in his car, 
tied, having tied a hosepipe from the exhaust to the inside of the car and 
killed himself - with carbon monoxide poisoning….That man's blood, 
according to my police spokesman has, who I got in the pathologist's lab, 
that man's blood is the blood that was substituted for Henri Paul's. ‘ 

Martine Monteil, the head of the French Judicial Police who investigated 
the crash, is outraged at the suggestion: ‘These stories of switched test 
tubes are nonsense. Henry Paul’s blood samples have never been switched’ 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/spl/hi/programmes/if/transcripts/how_diana_died.txt


Family of Diana Crash Driver Speak of Their Legal Battle 

Listen to Audio 

by Adrian Addison and Angus Stickler 

The parents of Henri Paul - the chauffeur blamed for the death of Princess Diana are taking action in the French Courts to try and clear his name. The French Authorities say he was drunk at the wheel. But in their first ever interview - the parents told have told the Today Programme - that they believe the blood sample taken at the time of the accident was not their son's. They are taking legal action to try and force the French authorities to release the blood for an independent DNA test. 

It's five years this month since the death of Princess Diana and for five years the parents of the chauffeur Henri Paul have maintained their silence. But, they revealed in an exclusive interview with BBC Radio 4's Today Programme, they speak about how they've been forced to resort to the courts to obtain the blood samples taken at the time of the crash. They strongly refute allegations that their son was a heavy drinker, and believe that the blood tested possibly came from one of dozens of bodies held at the Paris morgue that night. 

They say that levels of carbon monoxide found in the blood sample would incapacitate an adult - that their son would have been unable to walk let alone drive a car. They point to the fact that three days earlier their son passed a medical for his pilots licence. If he was an alcoholic, they say, he would have failed. So far the French Authorities have refused to release the blood. The parents say they will accept the result of an independent DNA test if it proves that the sample came from their son. 

This is what they said: 

How did you hear about your son's death? 

Jean Paul: A telephone call at four in the morning. 

Giselle Paul: From one of his colleagues who worked at the Ritz and who was worried that we would be surprised, that we would learn on the radio that there had been an accident. We found out he was dead but they didn't tell us who he was with. We didn't know he was with Dodi and Diana. 

What went through your mind? 

Giselle Paul: I thought straight away that we would have a lot more problems than if he had been, say, with one of his friends , given that he was with Diana. We understood that. 

And there have been problems haven't there. The finger of blame points directly to your son. Do you accept this? 

Giselle Paul: No. Not at all. We want to know the truth. We're certain that our son wasn't drunk. We don't accept it. For us, he was a good man, a good son. People say parents are often biased and that can be true but everyone who knew him, who lived with him said the same. 

It's alleged he was a heavy drinker, that he was drunk the night of the accident. You're saying he wasn't. How can you prove that? 

Jean Paul: Because we knew him since he was born. 

Giselle Paul: Exactly. And, when you think about it, it would have been obvious if he was drunk. Dodi had another driver. He had his personal driver. Would have used a man who was drunk and who wasn't a professional driver? And also, there was a bodyguard there. you would have thought a bodyguard wouldn't let a drunk driver take them when there were other people around. 

But there were two separate blood tests. Both of those showed a high alcohol count. 

Jean Paul: We're not experts in pathology. 

Giselle Paul: We're not experts. But I suppose if there were two they would show the same thing. 

Jean Paul: There were 30 autopsies. 

Giselle Paul: On the same night, there were others. You can imagine how they might have been mixed up. There could have been a mistake. 

So you don't actually believe that this is your son's blood that they've tested? 

Giselle Paul: That could be the case. That could be one reason. It could be that. 

So what are you concerns about the investigation? 

Giselle Paul: Since the beginning we haven't made any progress. The only thing we want is our son's blood... to re-do the tests and see if what they say is right. But that's always been refused to us. Always. We've had no success. 

Surely this is your word against that of the authorities. How can you prove that your son wasn't drinking? 

Giselle Paul: We can't. We can't prove it. He's dead. It's easy to attack a dead man. They said his liver was in perfect condition. And we would have known, we would have seen if he'd been drinking. The 28th of August, he passed his medical exam for his pilot's licence. Everything was fine. And three days later he was labelled alcoholic. 

So you're saying it's ridiculous that he can be accused of being an alcoholic. But you also have concerns about the levels of carbon monoxide in his blood. 

Giselle Paul: Yes. Yes. As far as carbon monoxide is concerned... 

Jean Paul: It's inexplicable. 

Giselle Paul: They found 20% of carbon monoxide in his blood. We're not experts, obviously. But whenever we talk to people who know about this, they say it's impossible. He wouldn't have been able to stand with that level in his blood. 

So with this level of carbon monoxide in your son's blood you say that it's not his blood, that they've got the wrong blood. 

Giselle Paul: Yes, that's right. They could easily have made a mistake with 30 autopsies done on the same day...It's possible they made a mistake. 

So, what does this suggest to you? Do you think it was pure incompetence or something more sinister? 

Giselle Paul: We can't explain it. We know it can happen because everyone can make a mistake. 

Jean Paul: Incompetence maybe. Maybe ill will. Maybe both. But it must have been chaos that night, with 30 corpses on the table. 'I made a mistake'. No-one says that easily. Especially when important people are involved. 

Basically what you want to do though, if I understand correctly, is you just want to clear your son's name. 

Giselle Paul: Absolutely. That's the only thing. It's for his memory. No-one has the right to smear someone's name like that- and for what? We don't know why. We don't understand why anyone would want to say that my son was alcoholic. 

Jean Paul: Who profits from that? 

Giselle Paul: Who profits? Not me, not my son. And my son shouldn't leave the world like that - that image of him created by people when he wasn't anything like that. 

And is that the thrust of the legal action that you're taking? That you want his blood to do a DNA test on him. 

Giselle Paul: Yes, it's always been for that. It's always been to find that out. We're not pursuing anyone in particular. We're not accusing anyone of anything because we don't know. But it's always been about that, about getting his blood... 

What reason have the French government given to you for refusing to give you his blood. 

Giselle Paul: They don't give explanations. They don't say why. For us, it's as if we didn't exist. 

Jean Paul: It feels like we're completely shut out. A wall. 

Giselle Paul: We feel like.. if the President's dog was killed in an accident people would have cared more. 

Taking this legal action must be an expensive business. How much is it actually costing? 

Giselle Paul: It's not costing us anything because he had friends who look after us, fortunately. If not we couldn't have done anything. We haven't got the means. The state gives me a little over 600 euros a month. you do the maths! 

Has Mr Al Fayed had anything to do..had a part to play in your action? 

Giselle Paul: No. Not at all. 

This is a difficult question. But do you not feel in any way, shape or form that five years on it would be better for all the relatives, yourselves, Princes William and Harry just to let the matter rest? 

Giselle Paul: Only on condition that everyone else stops.... 

Jean Paul: Historically, the impression left is that our son was Princess Diana's assassin. It's false. 

Giselle Paul: Every day, people lose their children on the roads. But people don't smear their name, as they have with our son. Given that Diana was involved as well, people will always say she was killed by her drunk driver. That's what we don't want. We want to change that. That's why we're carrying on. 

If you get the blood and you get a DNA test and it turns out that it is your son's blood, what then? 

Giselle Paul: Then we couldn't do any more. It would be too late. But they should have listened to us right from the beginning when we asked. It's too late. They've deliberately let the matter drag on. 

Do you feel that you can properly grieve your son's death with all this going on? 

Giselle Paul: How can we grieve and get over it? No. When we're..when it's just us. We can't. It's not possible. No. 

Jean Paul: People seem to think you can close the door and that's it, you bounce back. But it's not like that. It eats us up, all the time. All our life...But I'm always hoping we'll make progress on the case. 

Giselle Paul: And we're forced to return to it all the time. It's why I've tried to not to talk about it too much. It's too difficult, we have to go back to the same place. 

Jean Paul: I sleep very badly. I've been an insomniac since it happened. And when I have nightmares I look for my son, my sons, all night. I try to get over it but there's always a part of me... 

Giselle Paul: I never saw my son come back..you know..in a state... or anything. Never. If I had I would say. But it never happened. Never... 
 


HOW DID DIANA PAPARAZZO DIE? 

By GREG SWIFT in Millau 
Daily Express June 9, 2000 

THE SHADY dealings and secret meetings that led to top paparazzi cameraman James Andanson being linked with Princess Diana's death may ultimately have caused his own. Andanson's barely-identifiable remains were found in his burned-out car in a French woodland last month. 

Initially, police believed that he had committed suicide; but now there is growing speculation that he may have been murdered. His widow Elizabeth, 45, was yesterday at their luxurious farmhouse in central France, still stunned by his death but unable to believe that he had killed himself. 

Meanwhile, confidential police forensic reports - seen by the Daily Express - about Andanson's possible role in the Diana tragedy potentially place him squarely at the centre of events. 

They indicate that paintwork and plastics from a white Fiat Uno owned by Andanson, 54, match exactly evidence recovered from Diana's Mercedes which had clipped a Uno before crashing in a Paris tunnel in August 1997. 

Those findings, coupled with question marks about an alibi Andanson gave to prove he was not in Paris on the night Diana died, have led to fears that his death may be connected to the Paris crash. For Elizabeth, the mystery surrounding his death has only added to the agonies she has suffered since losing her husband of more than 20 years. 

Reminders of him are everywhere in their home, built 10 years ago with the profits made from years of chasing stars and royals across Europe. 

On the edge of Lignieres village, the house called Le Manoir de la Bergerie has a Union flag fluttering in the garden, a symbol, his wife said, of Andanson's great affection for Britain. 

Mrs Andanson said she could not begin to understand the circumstances of his death and still waited for the police to provide some answers. 

The elegant, attractive widow said: "James came home on May 4 from a job in Paris and left almost at once for another job. That was not unusual and in all the years of our marriage I had got used to him dashing in and out without saying where he had been or where he was going. There were periods when we hardly saw each other. 

"I had assumed he was going back to Paris but the next day a gendarme came to see me and told me a body had been found inside a car in Nant, in southern France, and they thought it was James. 

"I was too shocked. My reaction was one of utter disbelief. There had been nothing unusual about James before he had left. Everything had been normal and now this awful news. 

"The next day the police came round once more and told me that they had identified the body in the car as being my husband's, from DNA results. The judge investigating the case in Millau has told me that she excludes no explanation for the tragedy but I have heard nothing for some time now. I am not sure what happened or why. My husband had been stressed for a while before he died but I put that down to the normal stresses of being a journalist. Did he have any enemies? There were none that I knew of but then, in his line of work, anything was possible." 

Andanson was well-known on the paparazzi circuit, which operates around the Mediterranean during the summer. Starting at St Tropez in southern France, it spreads round the coast to northern Italy, a haven for celebrities from May to August. 

While Andanson would photograph any celebrity, he had made a speciality of travelling around Europe snapping royals, in particular the British Royal Family, while working for the Sigma and lately the Sypa photographic agencies in France. 

It is rumoured that he once made GBP 100,000 from a picture of Prince Charles kissing royal nanny Tiggy Legge-Bourke while they were skiing with his sons in Klosters. 

Andanson was at the head of the paparazzi chasing Diana around the Mediterranean in the weeks before she died, but his wife insisted that he was doing no more than he would have done in any summer. 

"James travelled to St Tropez every summer, it was part of his routine," she said. "He would always be photographing on that circuit and I would often travel down to see him and stay with him there. 

"He was not hounding Diana during that period - he spent two months in that area every year. 

"But I didn't keep a track of his movements as he was always rushing in and out. When he was at home, he was at home. When he was off on a job, he was on a job. Police have given me no hard evidence and until they do, I will have no firm opinion. There is no point in my trying to guess if it was suicide or murder." 

It will now be the task of Alain Durand, the public prosecutor at the High Court of Millau, to run an investigation that will seek to establish the true cause of his death. 

The location of Andanson's death is suspicious in itself. Instead of driving the 190 miles north to Paris, Andanson's car travelled in the opposite direction, ending up almost 400 miles south of his home, on the Larzac plateau near Montpellier. Taking a narrow, unmarked road, his car was driven to a tiny hamlet called Les Lassiques Basses where it turned off on to a dusty, pot-holed farm track. 

Two miles later, and surrounded by empty countryside, his car turned off the track and bounced almost a mile uphill across a cow field before crashing through dense forest to a clearing that few locals knew existed. 

Yesterday a trail of melted metal led to the huge patch of scorched earth and trees that marks the spot where Andanson's body was found. 

Farmer Julian Christian, 37, who owns the land, was one of the first at the scene after the alarm had been raised by a nearby army base, whose sentries spotted smoke on the horizon. The isolation of the location meant that by the time anyone arrived, the fire had gone out. Mr Christian said: "I came into this clearing and the car was badly melted. The glass had shattered, you could still feel the heat and the driver's body, well, it was hardly there." 

Police and justice officials are still refusing to commit themselves to an opinion on Andanson's death. A court official said: "We are considering the evidence before making up our minds." 

Mrs Andanson would not be drawn on making a connection between her husband's death and the crash which killed Diana. She said: "When our Fiat Uno was impounded by the police I was very worried about what might happen but James stayed calm. Eventually, the police said they were satisfied that the car was not the one that was supposed to have been involved in the crash." 

BUT ACCORDING to the reports seen by the Daily Express - and which eventually ruled out Andanson's car being the one involved in the Diana tragedy - there are distinct matches between his car and the samples salvaged from Diana's crashed Mercedes. 

A report says: "The comparative analysis of the infra-red spectra characterising the vehicle's original paint, reference Bianco 210, and the trace on the rear view mirror of the Mercedes shows that their absorption bands are identical." It goes on: "The comparative analysis between the infra-red spectra characterising the black polymer taken from the vehicle's fender, and the trace taken from the door of the Mercedes, shows that their absorption bands are identical." 

Question marks have also been raised about the alibi used by Andanson to prove that he was not in Paris on the night of the crash. Andanson told detectives that he had been at home until 3.45am on August 31, when he travelled to Orly airport and caught a flight to Corsica. 

His son James, now 20 - his daughter Kimberley is 12 - told police he thought his father was grape harvesting in Bordeaux and had phoned home that morning at about 4.30am. 

By contrast, Elizabeth Andanson gave a statement saying that she had been at home with her husband and he had left at 4am. 

Yesterday, she explained the inconsistencies by saying: "It was always very difficult to recall James's precise movements because he was always coming and going. 

"The family was very used to that and so never paid a great deal of attention to the times he came and went." 

The doubts surrounding James Andanson's death have alerted Mohamed Al Fayed, whose son Dodi was killed in the Paris crash with Diana. 

Yesterday, the Harrods boss's head of security John Macnamara said: "Mr Al Fayed has never accepted that this was a simple traffic accident. 

"He believes that his son and the Princess of Wales were murdered and he is quite sure that the truth will emerge in the fullness of time. 

"Mr Andanson had for some time been a prime suspect who had relentlessly pursued Diana and Dodi prior to their arrival in Paris. 

"We have always believed that Andanson was at the scene and that more investigation should have been done into his possible involvement. 

"We believe that his death is no coincidence and that this is a line of inquiry which may help to discover the truth. Was Mr Andanson killed because of what he knew? That is a question we want answered." 

Copyright 2000 EXPRESS NEWSPAPERS 

http://web.archive.org/web/20051218141759/http://www.alfayed.com/details.asp?aid=57


Diana Inquest: Who Killed Princess Diana?
a book by John Morgan
2012 March

Product Description

This explosive, evidence-based book is the most shocking, revealing, yet factual work written on the 1997 Paris car crash that took the lives of Princess Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed. Diana Inquest: Who Killed Princess Diana? includes evidence showing the assassination of Princess Diana was carried out by the British intelligence agency, MI6, on orders from senior members of the British royal family.
Sensational new revelations include documentary and witness evidence which demonstrates that the top three MI6 officers in Paris were replaced by more senior officers in the days immediately prior to the Paris crash.
Analysis of testimony from MI6 officers reveals they lied repeatedly during their inquest cross-examinations.
There is strong evidence of MI6 involvement in two failed assassination plots against high-profile world leaders in the 18 month period leading up to the successful Diana assassination
This book also exposes Rosa Monckton – wife of former newspaper editor, Dominic Lawson – as an MI6 agent who spied on Princess Diana.
Who Killed Princess Diana? covers the role of the Queen and senior royals in the deaths. It reveals evidence of a special rescheduled meeting of the royal Way Ahead Group – chaired by the Queen – being held just 39 days before Princess Diana was assassinated. Analysis of the inquest testimony of the private secretaries of the Queen and Prince Philip shows they both lied about the nature and content of Way Ahead Group meetings.
This volume – the fifth in the Diana Inquest series – also includes evidence showing that British Prime Minister, Tony Blair, had prior knowledge of the assassination of Princess Diana.
The book reveals how the inquest judge, Lord Justice Scott Baker, deliberately prevented his jury from being able to piece together the evidence that could have allowed them to understand the roles played by MI6 and the royal family in the deaths of Diana and Dodi
The Diana Inquest series of books is based on forensic analysis of the testimony heard during the 2007-08 inquest, and also on evidence from the British police investigation that was withheld from the inquest jury. A leading UK QC, Michael Mansfield, who served throughout the six months of the London inquest, has stated “I have no doubt that the volumes written by [John Morgan] will come to be regarded as the ‘Magnum Opus’ on the crash ... that resulted in the unlawful killing of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed and the cover-up that followed.” Dodi’s father, Mohamed Al Fayed has said: “I believe that John Morgan has done more to expose the facts of this case than the police in France and Britain.”

About the Author

John Morgan, who is based in Brisbane, Australia, is an investigative writer with a diploma in journalism. Since 2005 he has carried out extensive full-time research into the events surrounding the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed. After studying the Paget report when it was published in December 2006, he was shocked by the content of it. He realised that the £4 million report which took three years to produce was littered with inaccuracies and poorly drawn conclusions -- John viewed it as a huge injustice to the memory of Princess Diana. The 2007 book, Cover-up of a Royal Murder, was the result of his subsequent investigation into the Paget report. John went on to closely follow and analyse the proceedings and transcripts of the London inquest into the deaths of Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed. The Diana Inquest series of books is the result of his thorough research and investigation into that process. John Morgan can be contacted at





The Murder of Princess Diana
a book by Noel Botham



Princess Diana: The Hidden Evidence
a book by Jon King & John Beveridge

The staggering new evidence contained in this book offers the most compelling argument yet that British and US Intelligence acted jointly to assassinate Princess Diana. Endorsed by HRH Prince Michael of Albany, plus many highly placed intelligence and government sources, this book reveals the frightening truth behind the death of the world's most adored princess.
� How British and US Intelligence monitored Diana's every move; and how, following her divorce from Prince Charles, MI5 chiefs resolved to 'remove' her in order to avert the biggest constitutional crisis in Britain since Henry VIII;
� Why MI5 chiefs were reluctant to assassinate Diana in Britain; thus why MI6 and the CIA resolved to kill her "on foreign soil"; and how Britain's BBC announced that Diana had been killed 'in a road traffic accident' before the crash in Paris occurred;
� How the secret services of both East and West favour the 'road traffic accident' as a deniable means of assassination; how this same method of assassination has been successful in previous 'deniable ops'; and thus why Diana died in a 'road traffic accident';
� How chauffeur Henri Paul worked for MI6; how his blood sample - which underpins the 'drink-drive accident' theory - was switched; and how all CCTV cameras at the crash scene were mysteriously switched off;
� How two secret letters written by Diana just before her death implicate the British Crown in "nefarious activities in Africa", specifically Angola; and how Diana threatened to expose the Crown's vested interests in Angola by pursuing her 'landmines campaign' in that country;
� How secret 'landmines' talks held at the White House precipitated the involvement of the CIA; and how these same talks engendered Bill Clinton's 'sex-at-work' problems and almost cost him the Presidency;
� Why Diana's love affair with Dodi Fayed simply could not be tolerated - why, according to a high-ranking British Foreign Office source, it was "the final nail in her coffin";
� How Diana's unique and hitherto unknown ancestry, together with her unprecedented popularity, almost toppled Britain's Monarchy; how the Royal Family finally ordered an MI6 action against Diana; indeed, how the British Royal Establishment conspired to have Diana assassinated.


Princess Diana’s Death and Memorial: The Occult Meaning

Apr 13th, 2009 | Category: Vigilant Reports

Why did Elton John dub Lady Di “England’s Rose”? Was it because she was beautiful or because the rose has a deep occult meaning? This article explores the numerous occult symbols used in the memorials to Diana’s memory. To occultists, Diana wasn’t simply a princess, she represents the Sacred Feminine.
diana_with_survivors2
Lady Diana was often considered by the media as the “People’s Princess”. Loving, caring and beautiful, she possessed all the attributes to become a subject of idolatry. And so she became. Images of her taking care of poor children in Africa or speaking against landmines have struck the imagination of the whole world. Time Magazine said about her:
“Diana was beautiful, in a fresh-faced, English, outdoors-girl kind of way. She used her big blue eyes to their fullest advantage, melting the hearts of men and women through an expression of complete vulnerability. Diana’s eyes, like those of Marilyn Monroe, contained an appeal directed not to any individual but to the world at large. Please don’t hurt me, they seemed to say. She often looked as if she were on the verge of tears, in the manner of folk images of the Virgin Mary.”
Similarly to the Virgin Mary, Diana had (and still has) legions of followers, worshipping her giving nature and her maternal energy. In other words, she seems to fulfil the almost inherent need in human beings to worship a female goddess, giver of life and filled with compassion. The media has been a key actor in the creation of this icon by documenting every detail of her fairytale wedding, her troubled marriage, her humanitarian activities and, finally, her untimely death. Was Diana picked and groomed to become a sort of a “modern day Goddess” to ultimately be sacrificed, in accordance with ancient pagan practices? This might sound preposterous to the average National Inquirer reader, but not to the connoisseur of the occult practices of the world elite. Furthermore, numerous clues and symbols have been placed by this group to subtly commemorate the occult nature of Lady Di’s death. We will not go into details concerning her assassination, there are tons of sites and books discussing it. We will rather focus on the symbols that have surrounded the events of her death and memorial, which are the signature of the occult elite. These are visible to everybody yet only recognizable by those who have “eyes to see and ears to hear”.
Diana has been elevated to the level of Goddess in order to become the object of ritual sacrifice. This practice has been carefully planed by a secret group of illuminated people, often referred to as the “Illuminati”.  It comprises world leaders such as the British Monarchy and they are known to be DEEPLY versed into dark occult rituals.  If you have difficulty believing this, remember that the Nazis were in full force less than 60 years ago, displaying everywhere the esoteric symbol of the swastika, organizing massive occult rituals and bringing back pagan Germanic imagery .

The Goddess Diana

In Roman mythology, Diana was the goddess of nature, childbirth, hunting and the protector of the weak. She is the equivalent of the Greek goddess Artemis and she represents the Sacred Feminine, the female aspect of deity. Princess Diana bore the same attributes by being a protector of the environment, taking care of the weak in her missions in third world countries and by giving birth to the future heirs of England’s throne. Oak tree groves were especially sacred to the Goddess Diana. In Roman times, Diana’s groves and sanctuaries were always in the wild, outside of the boundaries of the city. Such hidden temples were found all across Europe. To further the resemblance with the Goddess bearing her name, Lady Diana was buried in a grove in her home town (more on this later). The Goddess Diana is often depicted with deers and doves.
artemis2
The female principle is often represented by the moon, where the Moon goddess is opposite to the Sun god . The feminine energy is also commonly associated with the planet Venus, represented in symbolism by a five petal flower – the rose. The goddess figure appears unmistakably in all religions, even in Christianity as the Virgin Mary. These symbols representing the female deity exist since prehistoric times and were preserved and diffused through pagan mysteries and through mystic Judeo-Christian teachings. Today’s students of the occult easily recognize and interpret those symbols. We will later explain how they have been used to associate Lady Di with the concept of the sacred feminine.
 

Pont d’Alma Tunnel, the Sacrificial Site

As you might know, Princess Diana died in a limousine “accident” inside the Pont d’Alma tunnel, in Paris. Her vehicle was supposedly chased by paparazzi who caused the world-class chauffeur to lose control due to his inebriated state after consuming alcohol.   We can argue for days about the theories concerning these events, but this is not the purpose of this article. The truth lies in the symbols placed on purpose for the initiates to recognize. One of them is the actual site where Diana lost her life, the Pont D’Alma Tunnel.
The city of Paris was built by the Merovingians, a medieval dynasty which ruled France for numerous generations. Before converting to Christianity, the Merovingian religion was a mysterious brand of paganism.
“ …the Merovingian kings, from their founder Merovee to Clovis (who converted to Christianity in 496) were ‘pagan kings of the cult of Diana’.”
-Clive Prince, The Templar Revelation
The Pont D’Alma Tunnel was a sacred site dedicated to the Moon Goddess Diana, where they used to practice ritual sacrifices. During those ceremonies, it was of an utmost importance that the sacrificed victim died inside the underground temple. The assassination of Diana was a reenactment of this ancient pagan tradition. Shortly after Diana was killed, Rayelan Allan (a researcher of esoteric history since the early 1970′s, who was also married to Gunther Russbacher, a deep cover CIA/ONI operative) wrote an article called “Diana, Queen of Heaven”. The article was picked up by numerous newspapers across the United States and Europe. Several authors who have written books about the death of Princess Diana used Rayelan’s article as reference. However, no one fully understood the deeper meaning of the article. Therefore, Rayelan decided to expand it into a book. The book states that in pre-Christian times, the Pont d’Alma area had been the site of a pagan temple of the goddess Diana and a direct gateway to heaven. Mindful of this safety net, the place was chosen by the Merovingian kings (AD500-751) to fight their duels, with the loser going directly to paradise.  ”Pont” means “bridge” and “Alma” means “soul” and for Merovingians, the site was a bridge across the “river of souls”. So, Pont de L’Alma, the site of the accident which killed Princess Diana, means “Bridge of the Soul.”

The Memorial Torch of Pont d’Alma

ditorch
If you know a little about occult symbolism, a torch mounted on a black pentagram might make your radar go off. The torch is the ultimate symbol of the illuminated (people that have acquired the secret knowledge of the occult order). This torch is an exact replica of the one being held by the Statue of Liberty and was placed there in 1989 as a gift. So this wasn’t placed as a tribute to Princess Diana but it has become, over time, the unofficial memorial. The torch has reached this status because of its location, which is right on top of the Pont d’Alma Tunnel. After Di’s death, several memorial notes and flowers were placed, encouraging the general population to adopt this occult landmark as a memorial. Some even say that this torch was placed on purpose as an indicator of the location of this planned assassination. Whatever the case be, the symbol of the torch or the eternal flame has been used in other high profile killings, i.e. the JFK tombstone.
jfk_grave1

Lady Di Memorials and Rose Symbolism

Located in London, England, the park dedicated to Princess Diana contains an oval shaped fountain and a sanctuary. The most significant symbol can however be found on the ground:
407626786_97d0eaeaa9
We see here Diana represented by a five petal flower (rose) , the classic occult symbol to represent female energy. Here’s what Wikipedia has to say about it:
“The cinquefoil (from the french, five-part) is a five petalled rose found in Christian symbolism of the Middle Ages. The five-petalled rose is often found affixed to the tops of Gothic arches, the vesica pisces-shaped doorways and windows thought to represent the womb of Mary. Some historians have speculated that the rose in Gothic architecture is a secret symbol of the feminine principle, one of a multitude of hermetic symbols found in these churches.The symbol itself dates back to Roman times, where it was called the ‘Rose of Venus.’ The rose, with its characteristic five petalled shape
mimicked the pentagrammatic path traced by the planet Venus in the night sky. This, combined with the flower’s natural beauty, made it an obvious symbol of the Goddess of love.”
The five-petal flower, the rose, the five-pointed star, the moon and Venus can all represent the female principle when we study occult symbolism. The huge rose window of Notre-Dame de Chartres in Paris represents the Virgin Mary (Notre-Dame means “Our Lady”). The symbol of the planet Venus (♀) is also used to represent the female sex . The moon is also associated with the female principle because it absorbs light from the sun (receptacle) and it has an effect on the tides of water (humidity=femininity). Those associations have existed since the beginnings of time and take their roots in ancient paganism.
There is a blatant effort to associate Princess Diana with the symbols of female deity through the symbols used to commemorate her life. The rose is used to represent Diana in numerous instances:
Memorial coin from Royal Mint:
gb5pound1999
Memorial Garden in Paris
princess_diana_memorial_garden
February 14, 2001 — PARIS, France (CNN) — A garden dedicated to the memory of Britain’s Princess Diana has been officially opened in Paris. French officials say the flower beds — France’s official memorial to the Princess — will eventually bloom, providing a place for children to learn about flowers, plants, vegetables and respect for the environment. But critics have scoffed at the project, laid out in a school courtyard, dubbing it “1,000 square metres of leeks.” “Through this place I wanted to pay tribute to a woman whose generous heart showed her deep fondness for nature and human relations, particularly with children,” Paris mayor Jean Tiberi said as he opened the garden on Wednesday.
Diana — the former wife of Britain’s heir to the throne, Prince Charles — died in Paris in August 1997. She was in a car which crashed at high speed while being pursued by photographers. Her companion, Dodi Fayed, and their driver, Henri Paul, were also killed. But Diana’s name is the only one featured on a plaque outside the memorial garden, in the central Marais district of Paris. One local councillor complained that the princess deserved a grander honour than a “vegetable plot.” But British officials have enthusiastically endorsed the site. “There could be no better tribute to her memory than a garden where young children can play and learn about nature,” said Michael Jay, Britain’s ambassador to France.
Memorial Medallion
diana11diana2
So the association of Princess Diana’s memory with the rose, the occult symbol of female deity is used ad-nauseam. Maybe this is why Elton John has dubbed Lady Di “England’s rose”.  To regular-minded people, those associations are insignificant but to initiates of the occult, symbolism is EVERYTHING.

Diana’s Burial Site

The original plan was for Diana to be buried in the family vault at the local church in Great Brington but this was changed by her brother, Earl Spencer. He said he was concerned about public safety and security and wanted his sister to be buried where her grave could be looked after properly and visited in privacy by her sons. In actuality, Diana was buried in a grove to further her resemblance with the Goddess Diana.  The actual area for her burial is on an island in an ornamental lake known as The Oval within Althorp Park’s Pleasure Garden (is there any relation with the oval-shaped fountain in the Lady Di memorial Park?). An ancient arboretum stands nearby, which contains trees planted by Prince William and Prince Harry, other members of her family and the princess herself. Here are pictures of her burial site.
oval



diana1pa3108_468x702
Note the flaming torch on her tombstone. The burial site of Diana cements her association with the ancient Goddess Diana who was worshipped in recluse groves outside of urban areas.

Memorial at Harrod’s Store

This is the 1st memorial dedicated to the unfortunate couple, on display at Harrods – a huge department store located in London. The store also happens to be owned by Dodi’s father. The symbolism here is extremely esoteric and significant. It surely deserves an in-depth analysis.
800px-112407-harrods-diannadodimemorial2
The yoni and phallus were worshipped by nearly all ancient peoples as appropriate symbols of God’s creative power. The Garden of Eden, the Ark, the Gate of the Temple, the Veil of the Mysteries, the vesica piscis or oval nimbus, and the Holy Grail are important yonic symbols; the pyramid, the obelisk, the cone, the candle, the tower, the Celtic monolith, the spire, the campanile, the Maypole, and the Sacred Spear are symbolic of the phallus.
-Manly P. Hall
First, we see pictures of Lady Diana and Dodi Al-Fayed in two interlocking circles. In occultism, the name for the two interlocking circles is “vesica piscis” and represents feminine energy. John Yarker  interprets this ancient symbol in his book “The Arcane Schools”:
The Vesica Piscis, two interlinked circles, is also known as “the Yoni”. The name “yoni” refers to the middle portion of the interlocking circles, is derived from the Sanskrit meaning, “divine passage”. That the yoni is the feminine, the yoni should be viewed such that the divine passage becomes a correlation to sex, or male/female union. It is this correlation, and its relation to rebirth and regeneration that remains a basic truth at the very core of Occult structural foundations.
vulva
The pointed oval is a universal symbol of the Divine Feminine and in this context the vesica piscis is the vulva of the Goddess, surrounded by the crescents of the waxking and the waning moon. This is yet another powerful symbol to associate Princess Diana with the female goddess principle. The vesica piscis was used by ancient pagans to represent the goddess Venus and was found in churches.
Below the pictures we find a pyramid with a capstone flanked by two candles (pillars). Look closely inside the pyramid:
274823778kekxbe_fs
It contains the wine glass – still bearing lipstick traces – used by Lady Di on her last supper. The symbol of the empty vase within a pyramid is another powerful image representing the union of the masculine and feminine principles. The wine glass carries the same meaning as the Holy Grail: the sacred feminine.
What more feminine symbol is there than the image of the vessel, the sacred womb of the mother? In patriarchal times, the Grail legends speak to the deepest parts of our souls in an archetypal quest for the feminine aspects of divinity.
In more abstract symbolism, a triangle pointing upwards represents the phallus and masculinity while a triangle pointing downwards represents the vagina, the womb, the receptacle and femininity.  Therefore, in this memorial we have a feminine symbol within a phallic symbol. The Goddess Diana joining with the masculine  -  Dodi. This union is further represented by the engagement ring (given by Dodi the night before their death) placed underneath the wine glass.

Memorial Statue at Harrods

363px-112407-harrods-diannadodimemorial1
This bronze statue is very odd. If the official cause of death of Diana and Dodi is a car accident, why does it say “Innocent Victims”? What were they victims of? Drunk driving?  Or did we mean that they were innocent victims of a sick occult ritual? More probable. Notice under Dodi’s foot is a dead bird. What does it represent?
 

To Conclude

What is the purpose of elevating Diana to the level of goddess through mystic symbolism? Numerous theories state that one of Diana’s sons will eventually become the much prophesied Antichrist. Are we making Diana the Virgin Mary of the Antichrist? Is the assassination of Diana, the “Moon Goddess” the response to JFK, the “Sun God” ‘s death? Was she part of a blood ritual due to the royal status of her family’s genealogy? Is the Queen of England actually a reptilian creature that can shape-shift into a 6 foot tall lizard? You can google any of these theories and you’ll find more essays than you can read. I have no proof about any of them so I won’t give a definite answer. One thing is for sure, symbols do not lie. Diana has been surrounded with the world’s most powerful people, and these people have deep knowledge of the occult. Initiates are fully aware of the fact that symbolism is the only true language of humanity and it can only be understood by those who are worthy. Diana’s memorials are PACKED with blatant symbolism, all referring to the same concept of female divinity. The symbols presented in this report weren’t destined to the average population, who still think that Diana died in a car accident. These esoteric codes serve the purpose of the elite, who carry out its rituals according to the secret knowledge it possesses.
This article has very summarily covered very deep and intricate symbols, each of which can be further studied. If you are unfamiliar with concepts discussed here, do yourself a favor and learn the language of the powerful.
 
Tags: 

 1596 298 141 15.1K 

Comments (147)

+9
cherokeehippe· 215 weeks ago
It explains why the ambulance stayed in the tunnel for a long time. I remembr watching it live and thinking...when are they going to hte hosptial? Why the delay. I now know why! They wanted her to die in the tunnel as part of the ritual.
+1
esther· 214 weeks ago
oh my God.....this might mean that the royal family is in some kinda occult thing, at least that's what's in my head...i think that's why this country is messed up. This is some crazy good info God bless u guys man..abundantly..:)
+3
Salma· 213 weeks ago
You did not explain the dead bird under Dodi's foot. I watched an interview with Al Fayed ( the father) saying he strongly believes his son and Diana were murdered by the royal family, and i think this is why it says (innocent victims). The bird on the other hand, i don't get. Can u please explain ?
1 reply · active 13 weeks ago
0
carl jhonson· 212 weeks ago
rik clay talked alot about diana and dodi before he died.(or suicided?) just thought i'd point that out. i remember my mom crying when this happened, which was weird because we are american.
+3
Cat Callahan· 206 weeks ago
FYI-George W. Bush is the grandson of Aliester Crowley-famous British satanist! His grandmother went through an occult Ipssimus ritual with 'the beast' in October and then took the ship home. Barbara was born the next June and as Dean Morton says "do the math!" Better yet-look at the pictures of them both! She is a dead-ringer for him! And just as evil!
+1
i was wondering, does this mean that Diana knew about her death all along? and Dodi also know?
+1
Nelson .A· 202 weeks ago
u have done well,I ran into this site,trying to no the meaning of Diana,after reading the Bible( Jeremiah 44 vs 17 to 22) Here the children of GOD,mostly the women offer sacriefies to to the queen of heaven,The queen of heaven means Diana"The Goddess".Read ur Bible well
+1
AgainstInfamy· 200 weeks ago
Vigilant Citizen,

Very interesting and provocative post. You forgot one important piece of evidence that very much helps your argument ... that would be composer John Tavener's "Song for Athene." Athene is an alternate spelling of Athena, the Greek goddess of which you speak, also known as Diana by the Romans. The song was commissioned by the BBC and performed at Princess Diana's funeral service. The song wasn't written specifically for Diana, it was in honor of a Greek woman named Athene, but it goes to show you what kind of occultic/pagan meaning the global elites saw in Princess Dian's life and death. Just through I would share that with you and your audience. You should look into it and possibly add it to this page.

The Wikipedia entry for what I'm talking about is here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Song_for_Athene 

BTW, I just stumbled upon this website for great, unfiltered, REAL economic news that I encourage all your readers to visit: www.cbfe-econ.blogspot.com
1 reply · active 24 weeks ago
0
Bill Hicks is God· 198 weeks ago
In mythology, Diana was the Goddess of the Moon as well. Princess Diana also had the astrological sign Cancer, which is ruled by the moon. When combined with Alma meaning moon, that's some freaky coincidence...if indeed, that is what it is. I'm not so sure. When she died, the sun was in the astrological sign of Leo - ruled by the sun.
1 reply · active 1 week ago
0
Bill Hicks is God· 198 weeks ago
p.s. The sign Cancer is a feminine sign and Leo is masculine, btw.
1 reply · active 24 weeks ago
0
Lashanda· 198 weeks ago
Great article Vigilant!!

Speaking of symbols it might be of interest to find out about the emperor nero's antichrist symbol or a.k.a the "PEACE" symbol, the symbol looks like an upside down cross within a circle. The below link will show you the picture (its the first on the left)

http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=Emperor+nero+... 

Most people assume this symbol means peace as it was used around the 1960's hippie era of peace and love. However this symbol represents the first persecutor of Christians and the killer of the Apostles Peter and Paul, by the emperor nero.
+1
When Diana, Emad (Dodi ~ or "Do Die") and Henri 'died', the Sun (or Apollo) was in the astrological house of VIRGO, not Leo.

Speaking through only one of her mediums, 'Diana' said that, in a past life, she was the grandmother of 'Jesus' ~ that would be the maternal grandmother, called by Roman Catholics, "Saint Anne"... actual name, 'Hannah'.

Incredibly, that being true, 'she' is then seen with her daughter Mary (Miryam) and grandson Jesus (Yehoshuah bin Yuself ~ Joshua the son of Joseph) in the world-famous "cartoon" (finished drawing) by the Great Master Da Vinci, that one numbered among those very, very many "possessions" owned by the Queen of England... identified by spirit guide Matthew [messagesfrommatthew suzy ward] as a major illuminatus, one unusual in that she is highly visible.

St Anne? Could then The Rose also have been Mary Magdalene? (whom Christ Jesus had intended to be a church leader) ~ entirely feasible.... in an anonymous channelled message, wrapped around a potted plant and laid on the ground amongst the hundreds of tributes at the gates of Kensington Palace in Kensington Gardens, London – on the first anniversary of her passing to spirit – 'Diana' said that she had been a Walk-in soul, and was previously Marilyn Monroe.

Spirit guides, by the way, have said that the rose was seeded on Earth from planet Venus.

Yes, DIANA endured a sacrificial death... but will YOU let hers be in vain? A long-time secret brotherhood were wont to say, "May the rose bloom on your cross"... to which I append (they won't mind) "May The Rose bloom in YOUR Heart" 

One of Diana's sons The Antichrist? ~ EXTREMELY improbable!
0
Seeker· 196 weeks ago
While it would be unfair to deem anyone the antichrist, I do find the power struggle over her children interesting. Also if you look at the changes prince Charles made to coat of arms, very weird. Another interesting fact Diana called the royal family "lizards" to her friends.
+1
Caveat Lector· 196 weeks ago
Princess Diana’s “accident” was not just an assassination, but a ritual sacrifice.

Even the place where Diana’s accident took place seems to have been especially chosen. The accident took place in a tunnel called Pont d'Alma. This is a huge coincidence under the circumstances. The place on which the Pont d’Alma is built is an ancient, pagan sacrificial site - sacred to the moon goddess (DIANA). In the pagan Roman religion before Christ, Diana was the triple goddess, the “Queen of Heaven”.

Additionally, since about the 6th century A.D., the Pont d’Alma has been associated with the Merovingian dynasty. Remember, those Merovingian kings were the ones supposedly possessing the blood of Jesus flowing through their veins. During this Merovingian period (c. 500 - 751 A.D.) if two kings had a dispute over property, it had to be settled by combat at Pont d’Alma. Legend says that anyone killed there goes to heaven to sit at God’s right hand, being able to look down and see all that happened on the earth, even their enemies. Thus, the person killed was actually the victor, because they became God’s eyes on earth and could manipulate humanity from heaven. Isn't it interesting that this is where Diana just happened to be killed? 

It is especially interesting in the light of the fact that Merovaeus, the founder of the Merovingian dynasty, was a devotee of the goddess Diana! 

Additionally, to create the rebirth of King Arthur in young Prince William Arthur Philip Louis Windsor (born Summer Solstice 1982) would require some extremely powerful magickal energy indeed; which could only be raised by the ritual murder of a “divine king” or a “royal” substitute. In the light of all this, it is entirely possible that Diana was sacrificed in substitute for Charles’ ritual murder. Also telling in this regard is that for the vicarious sacrifice to be effective, it would have to be done near - but before - the Harvest Home feast. August 31, the day of Diana’s accident does qualify.
0
Caveat Lector· 196 weeks ago
There are oddly “coincidental Masonic” elements to Diana' death as well.

Royal Arch Masonry is obsessed with bridge symbolism – Princess Diana was murdered under a covered bridge. In Paris, Diana died when the Mercedes she was in ploughed into the 13th pillar in a tunnel called Pont d’Alma on August 31 1997. Thirteen is very significant, both in Masonry and witchcraft. 

Above Pont d’Alma tunnel is a replica of the torch from the Statue of Liberty – a Masonic idol, sculpted by a French Freemason. That torch actually symbolizes the “light” of Lucifer. 

A final grisly Masonic “coincidence” which has been pointed out by more than one writer is what was done the course of supposedly trying to save Diana’s life (after the torturously slow ride to the hospital – it took all of forty minutes to travel 3.8 miles). To work on and massage her heart, her chest was cut open from collarbone to navel. This is the penalty of second degree in Masonry, to have your chest ripped open and your heart taken out. 

Remember that both Prince Charles and his mother, the Queen, are – by virtue of their leadership in the Order of the Garter – the highest ranking Masons in the world – even though neither is actually known to be a Mason. The Most Noble Order of the Garter is the most prestigious “chivalraic” order in the British Isles. The British monarch is – by virtue of his or her office – automatically the sovereign of the order. Queen Elizabeth was installed as a “lady” of the Order of the Garter on April 23, 1948 (her birthday) while still a princess. When she became queen, she became the sovereign of the Order. On July 26, 1958, Prince Charles became a knight of the Order. 

To this day, the Order of the Garter remains one of the most elite societies and appears to be at pinnacle of English-speaking Freemasonry, if not all Masonry. The Garter itself appears on the coat of arms of both the Queen and Prince Charles. This is why the strange “Masonic overtones” to Diana’s death are so significant. Many high-ranking Masons in government and the military of the United Kingdom might feel it was their duty to eliminate Diana; just as 110 years ago, high-ranking Masons in the royal court created the “Jack the Ripper” murders to cover up another troublesome woman.
+1
Truthisevident· 193 weeks ago
Who else noticed that August is also the month (according to wikipedia) in which sacrifices were offered to Diana? Same month princess D died. Rumors floating around that there was a member of the Rothschild family in the tunnel at that particular time to "complete the sacrifice" - Diana was held in the tunnel for about 1.5 hours after the crash! She wasn't rushed to hospital, who stays 1.5 hours in a crash site unless its in a remote valley where nobody can access them? But even then there is emergency airlift! Sheesh.
0
Guenevere· 192 weeks ago
Diana a walk-in soul who was Marilyn Monroe previously? Do the math. Diana was born on July 1, 1961. Monroe died August 5, 1962. So, Diana asumed Monroe's soul even before Monroe died? Rubbish.

Diana was a lost soul, subject to many traumas born of the generations-old occultism of the royals. Her bloodline was actually far more royal than Charles'. Many of the hard truths would shock you to death and will never be revealed by the occultists who live by them. And it is not farfetched that the Antichrist prophesied inScripture will hail from the House of Windsor. Actually, when you study prophecy and the House of Windsor, it seems less kooky of an idea. Go to www.prophecyhouse.com...this is where you can find THE absolute seminal work on the relationship of The House of Windsor and Charles to the coming world ruler. The information is shocking, well documented, and a must read. The Diana issue is addressed. It is not written in the oftimes sensationalist style of David Icke, but is true, well researched scholarship on the subject.
0
Guenevere· 192 weeks ago
Please note that the word 'this' was accidentally added by my poor typing to the 
www.prophecyhouse.com 
website and will cause problems accessing the page. Just use the above address with out the ...with added.
0
John Kenneth· 192 weeks ago
the address to find that book mentioned above is
www.prophecyhouse.com 

The book is called 'The Antichrist and A Cup of Tea' and is a real shocker in what it reveals about the royals and Charles' role in world destiny.
Мне понравился сайт. Много интересных и адекватных мнений. Благодарю автора
+2
Anders· 190 weeks ago
I think it should be noticed that the festival day of goddess Diana in Rome was August 13 - Princess Diana died on August 31; 31 is the mirror image of 13. The car crashed on the 13th pillar so we also have that number associated with her death.
0
reynold· 190 weeks ago
"In more abstract symbolism, a triangle pointing upwards represents the phallus and masculinity while a triangle pointing downwards represents the vagina, the womb" 

Does anyone else notices,that if you join BOTH TRIANGLES TOGETHER, they now take form of THE CENTER of the INTERLOCKING CIRCLES....the " YONI "?? 

i find it rather interesting....keep up the GREAT WORK Vigilant....
0
Angry O'Brien· 188 weeks ago
Caveat Lector: "Remember, those Merovingian kings were the ones supposedly possessing the blood of Jesus flowing through their veins."

Can you cite some sources for this, besides 'The Da Vinci Code.'

I should also note than any history of the Merovingian Dynasty is quite sketchy. It'd probably be impossible to confirm any of the speculations being put forth here in regards to that subject. 

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merovingian_dynasty#...
0
Bystander· 188 weeks ago
Perhaps, all these signs and symbols used to Princess Diana's memorials have nothing to do with anything sinister. It is just as possible that her death was truly an accident, as it is that she were murdered, however the evidence which this article hinges upon can not be found anywhere but upon other sites which have the same copy and pasted information. Take this into consideration, because I have not be able to find any verification that the Pont D’Alma Tunnel was ever used for sacrifices.

Perhaps these really are memorials that simply are acknowledging Princess Diana's benevolence and similarities to the Goddess Diana. I agree that the symbolism is blatant, but shouldn't memorials be symbolic of how a person was revered in life?

And to answer your question, "Innocent victims of what?" I prefer to believe the theory that the Royal Family was trying to clear the way for Prince Charles to marry Camilla, and also spare the family the embarrassment of Diana marrying someone out of the family's race and having children with Dodi, as it was rumored Diana was pregnant at the time of her death.

0
+1
You are all paranoid.
+1
really· 186 weeks ago
^^^^^^^

spoken like an innocent BYSTANDER....you were going somewhere with the out of the family marriage...??

paranoid over what i can see with both of my eyes,

if your only looking with one, i guess you know what side your on.
0
Mr. Beck· 185 weeks ago
I do not understand why there seems to be a vilification of the old Pagan religions in Europe. What has Christianity done for mankind, nothing but cause war and conflict with the Jews and Muslims. Lets revert our ways back to the simple days.
http://www.wakeupproject.com/VList.asp?Series=1 
“I Warn You Against Him (the Dajjal Antichrist)

And There Was No Prophet But Warned His Nation Against Him…

But I Will Tell you Something of Which No Prophet Has Told His Nation Before Me… You Should Know That He is One Eyed” And Allah-God is Not One Eyed” as Quoted by: Prophet Mohammad (pbuh, peace be upon him)
0
spinner· 185 weeks ago
Great article. Just wanted to point out that the great cathedrals were built by the Knight's Templar & they were in dedication to Mary Magdalen NOT Blessed Virgin Mary. The Church attempted to & managed to cover-up that fact.
0
Angry O'Brien· 185 weeks ago
Can you religious folks keep your delusional bullshit out of the comments? If you ACTUALLY believe that God and/or Satan are genuinely real entities, you're out of your mind. Can you communicate with God? So can the homeless schizophrenic at the corner. Seriously, wake up. There is no God in Heaven - when you die, your consciousness expires, your mind stops, there is no more "you" - The TV turns off, for good. Accept that, and live, live how you'd like to, not how some ancient man-made scripture would dictate you do. When people speak of sheep, or "sheeple" - you guys are the perfect example.
0
Angry O'Brien· 185 weeks ago
Can we please keep the religious crap out of the comments and stick to discussing the articles? No one cares what God's plan is in the context of these events. God is rubbish, and so are all your ignorant comments. Perhaps you've heard of the term "sheeple" if you're familiar with sites similar to this one - well, it describes you religious folk perfectly. There is no God or Heaven. When you die, your consciousness expires, there is no more "you" - and there certainly is no goddamn fairyland in the sky to go and hang out in afterwards. The TV turns off, for good. No more no less. Accept that and live -- the way you'd like to -- not the way some ancient man-made (and thus prone to fallacy) scripture dictates you do.
+3
Kessbot· 183 weeks ago
@Angry; have you died before? You must have, since you know so much about the afterlife.

Anyway, I've also noticed that the phallus and yoni combined create the Masonic square and compass.
0
Kessbot· 183 weeks ago
Wow, also the star of David.
+1
i think the reason it says Innocent Victims on the Harrods memorial is cos Mohammed al fayed (Dodi's dad) has always, and still does belive they were murdered in a conspiracy by the Royal family (mohammed is the owner of harrods)
+1
truther· 182 weeks ago
But what has confused me for a long time is Mohammed Al Fayed's stance in all of this - his memorial to Dodi and Di is full of occult symbology yet he stands by his public proclamation that the Royal Family had a part to play in their deaths?! Is he trying to expose the truth or is he supposed to be the idiot loon figurehead for anyone who suspects anything other than the lies we are being fed?
0
Whitney· 182 weeks ago
Interesting. I'm surprised you haven't published anything regarding Michael Jackson's death. Or have you, and I just haven't found it?
+2
there is but only ONE GOD, the lord JESUSU CHRIST!! give ur lives to Him and be saved!!
+3
You said "The goddess figure appears unmistakably in all religions, even in Christianity as the Virgin Mary." CORRECTION: The goddess figure appears unmistakably in all religions, even CATHOLICISM (not true Biblical Christianity, which is following the Truth (Jesus, Jn 14:6) .......NOT A RELIGION! Religions are man's attempt to get to heaven on his own terms. Following the Truth who is Jesus Christ, the Word of God, is true Christianity. Huge difference! You also wrote "These symbols representing the female deity exist since prehistoric times and were preserved and diffused through pagan mysteries and through mystic Judeo-Christian teachings." "Mystic Judeo-Christian teachings" is GNOSTICISM, again NOT true Biblical Christianity. Please don't taint the precious name of the Lord Jesus Christ by lumping Him in the same category of man made religion which is all really Satan worship in disguise. Jesus said "I am the way, the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father (heaven) but by Me." John 14:6 That's a very narrow path. 

And last of all, a word to Angry O'Brien: "The fool hath said in his heart, 'there is no God." Psalm 14:1 You are in for a very rude awakening when you leave this present world, Angry.
1 reply · active 23 weeks ago
+2
LAURENT SORELL· 179 weeks ago
Is not this page a MEMORIAL? The way I read it, it is a place for the the most tender memories which we should only wisper. 

This one is the only shrine glorifying the love between a Christian and a Muslim, and as such, it is the only contemporary place dedicated to absolute peace and love.

Please, my Brothers and Sisters, understand that this is not the Hyde Park Speakers' Corner open for screaming all your frustrations and curses. 

You may think He is invented or real, but His commandment, that you love one another should be obeyed. At least during the few minutes of your stop in this place
+1
crystal9· 177 weeks ago
people.....!!!!!

i bet those who write stuff that is negative about God have actually looked around and not seen the marvelous creation He made-the wonderous acts that even science cannot explain.WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!!!!!

the life you have is but given to you by God, and He can as well take it back from you once you despise Him.atleast read the Bible and see what he did to people who desipised Him and learn from that. dont be the fool who learns from His own mistakes.....
0
to all those atheists out there. the greatest trick that satan ever pulled of was to convince the world that he doesnt exist, once satan is removed from the equation then the concept of God and angels fall away without any resistance.
0
Ohh! This makes sense know, I was wondering why the old Queen of England wanted to meet Lady Gaga, obviously is cause she is working for them!
i didnt get the point
I heard she was killed becoz she wanted to reveal secrets
0
Very interesting. I think the author of this site knows what they are talking about. I think people who read these articles he or she writes should continue and do their own research.
0
ha-ha!· 175 weeks ago
religion is a sign of neurosis- Sigmund Freud. 'Angry O'Brien' I take my hat off to you. 

Ah yes.. the Christian fundamentalists... always turning everything into a debate about whether or not Fairies and Goblins exist! I'm so bloody glad i'm NOT american!
+1
Use Google Maps to view Althorpe and it's apparent that The Oval lake is an all-seeing eye: the grove Diana is buried in forms the pupil.
0
?????· 174 weeks ago
interesting topic, however one thing matters only

that no matter what symbols are visible, diana was an angel period.
You should check out one of Gaga's new songs called "Dance In The Dark"

at the bridge of the song she sings: "You will never fall apart Diana, you're still in our hearts, we'll never let you fall apart, together we'll dance in the dark¨"









2009] Princess Diana’s Death and Memorial: The Occult Meaning What is the purpose of elevating Diana to the level of goddess through mystic symbolism? Numerous theories state that one of Diana’s sons will eventually become the much prophesied Antichrist. Are we making Diana the Virgin Mary of the Antichrist? Is the assassination of Diana, the “Moon Goddess” the response to JFK, the “Sun God” ‘s death? Was she part of a blood ritual due to the royal status of her family’s genealogy? Is the Queen of England actually a reptilian creature that can shape-shift into a 6 foot tall lizard? You can google any of these theories and you’ll find more essays than you can read. I have no proof about any of them so I won’t give a definite answer. One thing is for sure, symbols do not lie. Diana has been surrounded with the world’s most powerful people, and these people have deep knowledge of the occult. Initiates are fully aware of the fact that symbolism is the only true language of humanity and it can only be understood by those who are worthy. Diana’s memorials are PACKED with blatant symbolism, all referring to the same concept of female divinity. The symbols presented in this report weren’t destined to the average population, who still think that Diana died in a car accident. These esoteric codes serve the purpose of the elite, who carry out its rituals according to the secret knowledge it possesses.
Princess Diana’s Death and Memorial: The Occult Meaning
Apr 13th, 2009 | Category: Vigilant Reports
HOW TO TAKE OVER THE WORLD  A Right Royal Con
a book by Greg Hallett.

The media is a Counter-Intelligence organisation. The media backs every war. The role of the media and embedded historians is to surround the truth with a bodyguard of lies.
Extracts
Most of the British Royal family are illegitimate, including Queen Victoria, Prince consort Albert, King Edward VII and his son Winston Churchill. Winston Churchill was first cousin with Adolf Hitler’s father and uncle to Anthony Blunt, King Edward VIII and King George VI. Adolf Hitler’s grandfather ran the Rothschild Bank, the Bank of England, and was the first Jewish MP in British Parliament. 
    Prince Albert was also the son of a stable boy. Close to bankruptcy, the British Royal family were saved by another stable boy, John Brown, who went on to marry Queen Victoria after Albert ‘died’.
    The British Royal family are a subset of the Rothschild family and the Rothschilds control all the wars and finances of the British monarchy. The British Royal family declare war as soon as the Rothschilds have completed their preparations. This makes for huge profits.
    Many royals died of syphilis and many others died from the treatment of syphilis. When a British royal didn’t like his wife, he simply ordered her murder – on their coronation night. This was repeated again 166 years later with the murder of Princess Diana as covered up by Lord Stevens.
[Interview] Great Zulu Shaman and Elder CREDO MUTWA On Alien Abduction & Reptilians
A Rare, Astonishing Conversation
9/30/99 by Rick Martin
To order The SPECTRUM call (877) 280-2866.
www.spectrumnews10.com
It has often been said that the Native Elders of any given tribe hold the keys to knowledge.  This statement has never been more clearly confirmed than in the recent interview I had the great privilege to conduct with Zulu “Sanusi” (Shaman) Credo Mutwa, now nearing eighty years of age. 
Through the efforts and assistance of David Icke, I was able to establish contact with Dr. Johan Joubert, who graciously coordinated with Credo Mutwa, thus allowing the interview to take place by telephone, literally half-way around the world in South Africa.  We at The SPECTRUM would like to convey our deepest appreciation to both David Icke and to Dr. Joubert for their selfless efforts at getting this man’s Truth out to the world. 
I first heard about Credo Mutwa five years ago, only at that time it didn’t seem possible to speak with him directly by telephone, as he lives in a somewhat remote area with no phone.  When I heard from David Icke that he had spent time with Credo Mutwa and that he would be willing to speak with The SPECTRUM, well, that’s all it took.  Through the wonder of the international telephone lines, on August 13 we had what turned out to be a 4-hour session!  And no, we are not about to pare it down to “sound bite” size.  The words he has spoken will appear completely and in full context, as is our usual policy-a matter of respect for the speaker as well as simply being good, honest journalism! 
Credo Mutwa is a man whom David Icke describes as: “The most amazing and knowledgeable man it has been my privilege and honor to call a friend, a genius.”  After speaking with Credo Mutwa, I couldn’t agree more.
I would like to comment that Credo Mutwa, while not a man of formal education, was kind enough and conscientious enough to spell all of the Zulu or African words, proper names, etc. for this article.  Those of you who may be African scholars will find this level of accuracy more advantageous to your research than will the average reader, however such care taken by Credo is yet another facet of his honesty and precision. 
If you feel that you have read some material lately that stretches your thinking and challenges some belief systems, this interview will take you one step beyond.  As always, Truth is stranger than fiction.  As well, Truth-or pieces of Truth revealed to any one of us-are part of a larger mosaic, and thus it is up to each of us to arrive at our own conclusions concerning the Truth that others have to share with us.
We are honored to have this opportunity to present Credo Mutwa’s experiences and knowledge with you.  It is a most rare and much appreciated opportunity.
The astonishing information presented by Credo Mutwa is certainly thought provoking and far-reaching in both implications and scope.  Once you read this information you will more readily understand why there have been attempts to silence him.  Similarly, you will more deeply appreciate Credo’s courage for coming forth and speaking truth, no matter the consequences to self.
So, without further introductory commentary, let the interview begin.
 
Martin:  First of all, let me say it is an honor and a privilege to speak with you, and I would like to thank and acknowledge David Icke and Dr. Joubert, without whose help we would not be having this conversation today.
Our readers are aware of the existence of the shape-shifting reptilian extraterrestrials, and what I would like to discuss with you concerns the specifics of their presence, their leadership, their agenda, and their methods of operation at this time.
So, the first question I would like to ask you is: Can you confirm that shape-shifting reptilian extraterrestrials do, in fact, exist on our planet at this time?  And if they do, if you can confirm this, will you please be specific about them.  Where do they come from?
Credo Mutwa:  Sir, can your newspaper send people to Africa? 
Martin:  I’m sorry, can you repeat that?
Credo Mutwa:  Can your newspaper kindly send somebody to Africa in the near future? 
Martin:  We are financially not able to do that at this time, but that may change in the future. 
Credo Mutwa:  Because there are some things that I would, please, like your newspaper to check-out, independent of me. You have heard of the country called Rwanda, in Central Africa? 
Martin:  Yes.
Credo Mutwa:  The people of Rwanda, the Hutu people, as well as the Watusi people, state, and they are not the only people in Africa who state this, that their very oldest ancestors were a race of beings whom they called the Imanujela, which means “the Lords who have come”.  And some tribes in West Africa, such as a Bambara people, also say the same thing.  They say that they came from the sky, many, many generations ago, a race of highly advanced and fearsome creatures which looked like men, and they call them Zishwezi.  The word Zishwezi means the dival or the glidal-creatures that can glide down from the sky or glide through water. 
Everybody, sir, has heard about the Dogon people in Western Africa who all say that they were given culture by the normal beings, but they are not-the Dogon people are but ONE of many, many peoples in Africa who claim that their tribe or their king were first founded by the supernatural race of creatures that came from the sky.
Are you still with me, sir?
Martin:  Oh yes, very much so.  Please continue.
Credo Mutwa:  Sir, I can go on and on, but let me bring you to my people, the Zulu people of South Africa.
Martin:  Please.
Credo Mutwa:  The Zulu people, who are famous as a warrior people, the people to whom King Shaka Zulu, of the last century, belonged.  When you ask a South African White anthropologist what the name of Zulu means, he will say it means “the sky” (laughter), and therefore the Zulu call themselves “people of the sky”.  That, sir, is non-sense.  In the Zulu language, our name for the sky, the blue sky, is sibakabaka.  Our name for inter-planetary space, however, is izulu and the weduzulu, which means “inter-planetary space, the dark sky that you see with stars in it every night”, also has to do with traveling, sir.  The Zulu word for traveling at random, like a nomad or a gypsy, is izula.
Now, you can see that the Zulu people in South Africa were aware of the fact that you can travel through space-not through the sky like a bird-but you can travel through space, and the Zulus claim that many, many thousands of years ago there arrived, out of the skies, a race of people who were like lizards, people who could change shape at will.  And people who married their daughters to a walking (extraterrestrial), and produced a power race of Kings and tribal Chiefs, there are hundreds of fairy-tales, sir, in which a lizard female assumes the identity of a human princess and poses as her, and gets married to a Zulu Prince.
Every school child in South Africa, sir, knows about the story of a princess called Khombecansini.  Khombecansini was to have married a handsome Prince called Kakaka, a name which means “the enlightened one”.  Now, one day while Khombecansini was gathering firewood in the bush, she met a creature called an Imbulu.  And this Imbulu was a lizard which has the body and the limbs of a human being, but a long tail.  And this lizard spoke to Princess Khombecansini, “Oh, how beautiful you are, girl, I wish I could be like you.  I wish I could look like you.  Can I come close to you?” said the Imbulu lizard woman to the princess.
And the princess said, “Yes, you can.”
And as the lizard, which was a taller one, came close to the girl, she spat into the girl’s eyes and she began to change.  That is, the lizard suddenly changed into a human shape and this lizard began to look more and more and more and more like the girl, with the exception of her long, pointed tail.  And then, with her sudden burst of violence, the lizard woman sealed the princess and removed all her bangles and her beads and her wedding skirt off her, and she put them on.  Thus, the lizard became the princess.
Now there were two identical women in the bush, the shape-shifted lizard woman and the original woman.  And the lizard woman said to the original woman, “Now you are my slave.  Now you are going to accompany me to the marriage.  I will be you and you will be my slave, come-on!”  She took a stick and started beating up the poor princess.  And then she went, accompanied by other girls who were bride’s maids, according to Zulu custom, and she arrived at Prince Kakaka’s village.  But, before they reached the village she had to do something about her tail, that is, the shape-shifting woman had, somehow, to hide the tail.  So, she forced the princess to weave a net out of fiber and she tucked the tail in and she tied it tight to herself.  She now looked like a Zulu woman with attractive, very big buttocks, when seen from outside. 
And then, when she arrived and she became the wife of the prince, a strange thing started happening in the village.  All of the milk started disappearing because each night the shape-shifting princess, the false princess, used to release her tail, which used to suck in all of the sour milk through a hole at the tip of the tail.  And the mother-in-law said, “What is this?  Why is the milk disappearing?”  Then, she said, “No, I see, there is an Imbulu amongst us.” 
The mother-in-law, who was a clever old lady, said, “A hole must be dug in the front of the village and it must be filled with milk.”  And this was done.  And then, all of the girls who had come with the false princess were told to jump over this hole.  One after the other one, they jumped.  And when the shape-shifter was forced, at spear-point, to jump as well, as she jumped her long tail burst out of the net under her skirt and started slurping the milk through the hole, and the warriors killed the shape-shifter.  And thus, the real Princess Khombecansini became the wife of the king-of King Kakaka. 
Now, sir, this story has got many versions in it.  Throughout South Africa, amongst many tribes, you’ll find stories of these amazing creatures who are capable of changing from reptile to human being, and from reptile to any other animal of their choice.  And these creatures, sir, do really exist.  No matter where you go throughout Southern, Eastern, Western, and Central Africa, you’ll find that the description of these creatures is the same.  Even amongst tribes which never, throughout their long history, had contact with each other at all.
So, there ARE such creatures.  Where they come from, I will never claim to know, sir.  But they are associated with certain stars in the sky, and one of these stars is a large group of stars which is part of the Milky Way, which our people call Ingiyab, which means “The Great Serpent”.  And there is a red star, a redish star, near the tip of this huge rim of stars which our people call IsoneNkanyamba.
Now, this star called IsoneNkanyamba, I managed to find its English name.  It is the star called Alpha Centauri, in English.  Now, this, sir, is something that is worth investigating.  Why is it that well over 500 tribes in parts of Africa which I’ve visited in the last 40 or 50 years or so, all of them describe similar creatures?
It is said that these creatures feed on us human beings; that they, at one time, challenged God Himself to war, because they wanted full control of the universe.  And God fought a terrible battle against them and He defeated them, injured them, and forced them to hide in cities underground.
They hide in deep cavities underground,  because they are always feeling cold.  In these cavities, we are told, there are huge fires which are kept going by slaves, human, zombie-like slaves.  And, it is further said that these Zuswazi, these Imbulu, or whatever you choose to call them, are not capable of eating solid food.  They either eat human blood, or they eat that power, the energy that is generated when human beings, on the surface of the Earth, are fighting and killing each other in large numbers.
I met people who have fled from the early Masaki in Rwanda, from years ago, and these people were horrified by what was happening in their country.  They said that the slaughter of the Hutus by the Watusi, and the Watusi by the Hutus, is actually feeding the Imanujela, monsters.  Because the Imanujela like to inhale the energy that is generated by masses of people being terrified or being killed by other people. 
Are you still with me, sir?
Martin:  Yes, I’m completely with you.
Credo Mutwa:  Now, let me point out an interesting thing, sir.  If you study the languages of all African nations, you find within the languages of our people words which are similar to Oriental, Middle-Eastern, and even Native American words.  And the word Imanujela means “the Lord who came”.  A word that anyone can discover in Rwanda, amongst the Rwandan Hutu and Watusi people, is very similar to the Herbrew word Immanuel, which means “the Lord is with us”.  Imanujela, “the ones who came, the Lords who are here”. 
Our people believe, sir, that we, the people of this Earth, are not masters of our own lives, really, although we are made to think that we are.  Our people say, that is, Black people of all tribes, all of the initiated ones, all of the shamans everywhere in Africa, when they get to trust you and share their deepest secrets with you, they say that [with] the Imanujela, there is Imbulu.  And there is another name by which these creatures are known.  This name is Chitauli.  Now, the word Chitauli means “the dictators, the ones who tell us the law”.  In other words, “they who tell us, secretly, what we are to do”.  Now, it is said that these Chitauli did a number of things to us when they came to this planet. 
Please forgive me, but I must share this story with you.  It is one of the strangest stories that you find everywhere in Africa in shamanic secret societies and other places where the remnant of our ancient knowledge and wisdom are still preserved.  It is that, originally, the Earth was covered by a very thick blanket of fog or mist.  That people could not actually see the Sun in the sky, except as a nimble of light.  And they also saw the Moon at night as a gentle claw of light in the sky, because there was this heavy mist.  And the rain was always falling in a steady drizzle.  There was no thunder, however.  There were no storms. 
The world was thickly covered with great forests, great jungles, and people lived in peace on Earth at that time.  People were happy and it is said, at that time, we human beings did not have the power of speech.  We only made funny sounds like happy monkeys and baboons, but we did not have speech as we now have it.  And in those centuries, people spoke to each other through their mind.
A man could call his wife thinking about her, thinking about the shape of her face, the smell of her body, and the feel of hair as a woman.  That a hunter would go out into the bush and call out for animals to come, and the animals would select one of their number which was old and tired, and this animal would offer itself to the hunter so that he may kill it quickly and take it as meat to his cave.
There was no violence against animals.  There was no violence against Nature by human beings at that time.  Man used to ask for food from Nature.  He used to come to a tree and think about fruit, and the tree would allow some of its fruit to fall to the ground, and man would take it. 
And then it is said, however, that when the Chitauli came to Earth, they arrived in terrible vessels which flew through the air, vessels which were shaped like great bowls and which made a terrible noise and a terrible fire in the sky.  And the Chitauli told human beings, whom they gathered together by force with whips of lightning, that they were great gods from the sky and that from now on they would receive a number of great gifts from the god.  These so-called gods, who were like human beings, but very tall, with a long tail, and with terrible burning eyes, some of them had two eyes-yellow, bright eyes-some had three eyes, the red, round eye being in the center of their forehead.  These creatures then took away the great powers that human beings had: the power of speaking through the mind only, the power of moving objects with their mind only, the power of seeing into the future and into their past, and the power to travel, spiritually, to different worlds.
All of these great powers the Chitauli took away from human beings and they gave human beings a new power, now, the power of speech.  But, human beings found, to their horror, that the power of speech divided human beings, instead of uniting them, because the Chitauli cunningly created different languages, and they caused a great quarrel between people.  Also, the Chitauli did something which has never been done before: they gave human beings people to rule over them, and they said, “These are your kings, these are your chiefs.  They have our blood in them.  They are our children, and you must listen to these people because they will speak on our behalf.  If you don’t, we are going punish you very terribly.” 
Before the coming of the Chitauli, before the coming of the Imbulu creatures, human beings were spiritually one.  But when the Chitauli came, human beings became divided, both spiritually as well as by language.
And then, human beings were given strange new feelings by the Chitauli.  Human beings started to feel unsafe, and so they started making villages with very strong fences of wood around them.  Human beings started becoming country makers.  In other words, they started creating tribes and tribe lands, which had borders, which they defended against any possible enemy. Human beings became ambitious and greedy and they wanted to acquire wealth in the form of cattle, and sea shells. 
And, another thing the Chitauli forced human beings to do, they forced human beings to mine into the Earth.  The Chitauli activated human women and made them to discover minerals and metals of certain types.  Women discovered copper; women discovered gold; women discovered silver.  And, eventually, they were guided by the Chitauli to alloy these metals and to create new metals which had never existed in Nature before, metals such as bronze and brass and others.
Now, the Chitauli, further, removed the sacred rain-bringing mist from the sky and for the first time since creation, human beings looked up and saw stars, and the Chitauli told human beings that they have been wrong in believing that God dwelt under the Earth.  “From now on,” the Chitauli told people of this Earth, “the people of Earth must believe that God is in Heaven and they must do things here on Earth which would please this God who is in Heaven.” 
You see, originally, human beings had believed that God was underground, that she was a very great mother who dwelt under the Earth because they saw all the green things growing from under the Earth-the grass came from below ground, the trees grew from below ground, and the people had believed, therefore, that the dead people who died go underground.  But when the Chitauli turned humans’ eyes towards the sky, people started believing, now, that God is in the sky and that those who die from this Earth don’t go underground, but go up into the sky.
And to this day, sir, throughout Africa wherever you go as an investigator, you will find this amazing-these two amazing ideas which conflict with each other.
Many African tribes believe in what is called Midzimu or Badimo.  Now, the word Midzimu or Badimo means “them who are in the sky”.  But, in Zulu-land, amongst my people, you find this amazing schism going hand-in-hand.  There are Zulus who believe that the dead ones are the Abapansi, which means “the ones who are below, who are under the Earth”.  Then there is another idea which says Abapezulu.  The word Abapezulu means “those who are above”, and the word Abapansi, which is the oldest name for the spirits of the dead, means “they who are under the Earth”.  
So, even today, sir, all over Africa amongst hundreds of tribes, you find this strange double-belief that the dead go into the sky, and side-by-side with the belief that the dead die and go under the Earth.  This belief that the dead die and go under the Earth is said to date to the days when our people believed that God was a woman, the great Cosmic Mother.  And, it is contrasted by the Abapezulu belief that God is a man who dwells in the sky. 
Now, sir, another thing that the Chitauli told our people, it is said, is that we human beings are here on Earth to change the Earth and to make it suitable for “God” to come down one day and dwell in it.  And it is said that they who work to change this Earth and make it safe for the serpent god, the Chitauli, to come and dwell in it, will be rewarded with great power and with great wealth. 
Sir, as I have watched over many years of study, over many years of initiation of the mysteries of African shamanism, wisdom, and knowledge, I have found myself wondering why we human beings are actually destroying the Earth on which we live.  We are doing something which is only done by one other species of animal, namely, the African elephant, which utterly destroys every tree in the place in which it dwells.
We human beings are doing exactly this.  And wherever you go in Africa, where once there were great ancient civilizations, you find desert.  For example, there is the Kalahari desert in South Africa, and under the sands of that desert, I have found the ruins of ancient cities, which means that human beings turned this stretch of land, which was once green and fertile, into a desert.  And, in days when I was with explorers and safari people in the Sahara regions of Africa, I also found evidence of unbelievably ancient human habitation in places where there is nothing now but angry rock and whispering sand.
In other words, the Sahara Desert was once a fertile country and was turned into a desert by human beings.  Why?  I must ask myself, again and again, why are human beings being driven by insecurity, greed, and lust of power to turn the Earth into a desert in which, ultimately, no human being would ever be able to live?   Why?
Although we are all aware of the terrible dangers that this will bring about, why are we cutting huge areas of jungle in Africa?  Why are we on Earth carrying out the instructions which the Chitauli programmed into us?  Although my mind refuses to accept this, the answer is a terrible yes, yes, yes. 
Amongst the many people of wisdom who honor me with their friendship, is a man of great knowledge who lives in Israel, Dr. Sitchin.  [Editor’s note: This reference is to Dr. Zecharia Sitchin, author of many provocative books about the interaction of extraterrestrial peoples with Earth humans in very ancient times.]  According to the ancient books which were written by the people of Sumeria, out of clay, gods came out of the sky and forced human beings to work for them, to mine gold for them.  This story is confirmed by African legends throughout Africa, that gods came out of the sky and made us into their slaves, and they made us into slaves in such a way that we would never realize that we are slaves. 
One other thing that our people say is that the Chitauli prey upon us like vultures.  They raise some of us, they fill some of us with great anger and great ambition, and they make these people they’ve raised into great warriors who make terrible war.  But, in the end, the Chitauli do not allow these great leaders, these great war chiefs and kings, to die peacefully.  The warrior chief is used to make as much war as possible, to kill as many of his people, and those he calls enemies, as possible, and then, in the end, the warrior chief dies a terrible death, with his blood being spilled by others.
And this phenomenon I have seen in my people’s history, again and again and again.  Our great King Shaka Zulu, he fought over 200 great wars during the reign of some 30-something years.  And then, he was slaughtered and he died a violent death.  He died a broken man who, because of the death of his mother, had no longer the power to win any more battles.
And, before Shaka Zulu, there was another king who trained Shaka to become the great king that he was.  That king’s name was Dingiswayo.  Dingiswayo had fought great wars trying to unite the Zulu people into one great tribe.  He had seen the White people of the Cape and he thought that, by uniting his people into one huge nation, he would be able to repel the threat to his people which the White people posed.  But, what happened was, after winning many battles of uniting many tribes, King Dingiswayo suddenly became striken by an eye disease which made him almost blind.  And he hid this secret that he could no longer see.  But, that terrible secret was discovered by a woman, a queen of another tribe, called Ntombazi.  Ntombazi took a battle ax and beheaded Dingiswayo with one blow, after she had lured him into her hut and given him food and beer to drink. 
There is also a similar phenomenon with great White leaders:  Napoleon, in Europe, who died a miserable death on his lonely island in the Atlantic Ocean;  Hitler, also in Europe, who died a terrible death by putting the gun in the mouth and killing himself, we are told;  Attila the Hun, who was killed by a woman, and many other great leaders who came to a sticky end after giving as much death and misery to as many people as they could.
King Shaka was stabbed to death by his half-brother, who used on him the same type of spear that he had designed to kill people as quickly as possible.  And, Julius Caesar also met a similar fate after he, like our Shaka Zulu, had conquered many nations.
Always the warrior hero dies a death that he, really, should not die.  King Arthur, in England, was killed by his own son, Mordred  after a long and courageous reign.  I could go on and on and on.
Now, all these things, if you bring them together, they show that whether people laugh at this or not, whether people scoff at this or not, there is a certain power that is guiding we human beings toward the dark river of self-destruction.  And the sooner many of us become aware of this, the better, perhaps, we might be able to deal with it. 
Martin:  Do you believe that these beings are around the world equally, or are they primarily focused in Africa?
Credo Mutwa:  Sir, I believe that these creatures are everywhere on Earth, and with respect, sir, although I hate talking about myself so much, I am a person who has traveled to many parts of the world.  I have been to your country, the United States, sir.  I have been to Australia.  I have been to Japan, amongst other countries.
And no matter where I have gone, sir, I have found people telling me about creatures like this.  For example, in 1997, I visited Australia, sir, and I traveled a lot to try and find the Black people of Australia, the Aborigine.  And when I did find them, they told me a number of things that astonished me very, very much.  The same things that I’d found in Japan, I found in Taiwan.  Everywhere where there are still shaman and traditional healers, you find these amazing stories. 
Now, let me tell you, sir, what I found in Australia alone.  This, that the Australian Aborigine people, who call themselves Coorie, which means “our people”:  The Coorie people of Australia believe in a great creating god called Byamie, sir.  A Coorie shaman, in fact, several of them, drew me pictures of this Byamie, and one of them showed me a rock painting representing this strange creator god who came out of the stars.  And when they placed their drawing in front of me, what they showed was a Chitauli.  I recognized it from my African initiation.  It had a large head.  It had large eyes, which were stressed by the artist.  It had no mouth, and it had long arms and incredibly long legs.  Sir, this was a typical depiction of a Chitauli which I knew from my own people in Africa.
I asked myself “Why?”  Here I am in a country many thousands of miles away from Africa, and here I am seeing a being known as the Biamai or Bimi, who is a creature with which I, the African, am familiar. 
Amongst the Native American people, sir, I found, for example, amongst certain tribes in America, tribes such as the Hopi people, and those people who stay in those buildings called a pueblo, I found that these people-they have got what are called Katchina creatures, where people wear masks and disguise themselves as certain creatures.  And some of these Katchinas are very, very tall, with a huge round head.
Exactly as we have in Africa, I found similar creatures in America.  In Africa we call these creatures Egwugwu, or, we call them by another name, called Chinyawu.  The Katchina of the Native American people, and the Chinyawu of our people, are identical beings.  Now, why should this be?  When were American Native people and Africans in contact?  When?  This is one of the greatest mysteries of all time, sir.  It is one of many things that I found throughout the world which left me utterly amazed. 
There ARE such creatures, and the sooner skeptics amongst us face up to this fact, the better it shall be.  Why is human-kind not progressing?  Why are we running around in a great circle of self-destruction and mutual-destruction?
People are basically good; I believe this.  People don’t want to start wars.  People don’t want to destroy the world in which they stay, but there are creatures, or there is power that is driving we human beings toward self-annihilation.  And the sooner we recognize this, the better. 
Just now, I live in Africa.  Here are my people.  Here is my home.  But I see Africa being destroyed in wars that make no sense whatsoever to me as an African.  I look at India which, like Africa, suffered the scourge of colonialism by the French, the English, and other European powers.  But India, through her independence as a country, has achieved the things which we, Africa, have failed to achieve.  Why?
India has exploded the atomic bomb and is today one of the feared nations of this world.  India has launched satellites into orbit.  India, although she has the same problems as Africa has-a burgeoning population, religion as well as tribal strife-although India has got an incredibly poor section of her population, as well as an incredibly rich one, she has achieved things that Africa has failed to achieve.
Now, I ask myself “Why? Why?”  Because India was established by people from Africa, and I don’t think, sir, as the Black races about this.  This is a fact that, thousands of years ago, people from Africa laid the foundation of the greatest civilization of India, as well as other countries in Southeast Asia.  There is overwhelming archeological evidence of this.  But, why is Africa drowning in war, in disease, and in hunger?  Why? 
Many times, sir, I sit in my hut and I cry when I see diseases like AIDS destroying us; when I see senseless wars destroying those countries in Africa which had thrived for thousands of years.
Say, Ethiopia is a country that has been free for thousands of years.  Ethiopia was once the school of all of Africa.  Nigeria was once a great country with a long tradition of self-government-long, long before the White man came to Africa.  But today, all of these countries and many others are being destroyed. 
Today, sir, there are parts of Africa which have been totally depopulated by war and by the disease called AIDS, a disease which shows every sign of being a man-made disease.  I ask myself, “Who or what is destroying Africa, and why?”
Because there are tribes in those villages I lived in, who assisted my search for knowledge, before the Second World War and after.  But today these tribes no longer exist anymore.  They are gone, dispersed, totally exterminated in senseless wars that gain the Black people nothing. 
I am in South Africa now.  Here I was born, and here I was to die.  But I see my country falling apart like a rotting mango.  South Africa was once a powerful country.  She had a powerful army.  She had huge industries, which were producing everything from locomotives to little radios.  But today my country has become a drug-sodden, crime-ridden piece of rubbish.  Why?  A country doesn’t get destroyed almost overnight, unless there are definite forces which are determined to obliterate it. 
I recently saw, sir, the destruction of another country inside South Africa.  The country is Lesotho.  This country, Lesotho, is inhabited by some of the oldest and the wisest tribes in South Africa.  Amongst them is a tribe called the Bakwama.  The Bakwama people are so ancient that they actually describe to you a mysterious land of huge pointed mountains, a mysterious land ruled by a great god, who had the head of a human being and the body of the lion.  [One immediately thinks of the Sphinx in Egypt.
The Bakwama call this country Ntswama-tfatfi.  This land that they name Ntswama-tfatfi means “the land of the Sun-hawk”.  The hawk is the bird of prey in Heaven-you know?  Now, these Bakwama people did, in South Africa, know about the land of Egypt where they say their ancestors came from.  And they call this mysterious land of the gods, “the land of the Sun-hawk, or the Sun-eagle”, which is exactly how the Egyptians portrayed their country, sir.  They portrayed it as “the land of Hor”, the god Horus in Greece. 
Now, when Princess Diana died, in 1997, I was one of the first Black people to suspect that Princess Diana had been murdered, and I will tell you why this thing happened, sir.  Because, about a year or 8 months before Diana died, there died a king in Lesotho, King Moshoeshoe II.  King Moshoeshoe II’s death was detail-for-detail identical to Princess Diana’s death. 
Consider this please, all of you who might find my words incredible:  Princess Diana died in a tunnel, but the king of Lesotho died in a ravine.  He had gone far away to investigate a problem in his cattle ranch.  It was found that he was overdue, and when the people went to search for him, they heard from various boys who were looking after the cattle in the Basotho-land mountains, that the boys had heard what sounded like a rifle shot, and when the men went to look where the rifle shot had sounded, they found the king’s car off the road and deep in the ravine.  They went down their and they found that the king of Lesotho was in his car.  He was strapped in a safety belt, but he had a terrible injury at the back of his head.  And they found that the king’s driver was dead at the steering wheel.  But, the two men who were the king’s bodyguards, who were riding in the king’s vehicle in the seat directly behind the king, had escaped without a scratch.  One of the men entered the car and pulled out the dying king.  The king apologized to them for messing-up their hands with his blood, which was a tradition, that a dying king must thank the people who are trying to get him out of where he is.  And he must apologize to them for putting them into trouble, because anyone who handles the sacred blood of the king is in spiritual trouble of some kind after that. 
Then, when the king’s car was brought out of the ravine, it was found that there was a hole, like a bullet hole, in one of the tires of the car.  And that car’s tire was mysteriously removed, afterwards, when the king’s car was stored not in a safe place, but in a yard outside where anybody could get at it.  And, when an autopsy was conducted on the body of the driver of the king’s car, it was found that the man had been so drunk as to not have been able to drive the car at all.  And third, the man who had driven the king’s car and who died at the wheel had not been the man who usually drives the king’s car. 
Now, sir, do you see this mystery now?  The death of the Lesotho king matched that of Princess Diana, which was to follow it.  In many other amazing details than I have detailed now, and so the nation of Lesotho was reduced to a retch after the king’s death, when rioting took place as a result of a general election which provisional party members prospected and controlled. 
Today Lesotho is an economically moribund nation.  And Lesotho is a country which was the place of a strange experiment-an experiment which consisted of the building of a huge dam, whose purpose was to supply South Africa, and not Lesotho, with large quantities of water.  And we have recently heard ugly rumors emanating from that country, that somebody was bribed to facilitate the building of this huge dam where the water of a small nation is being used to supply, to supplement the water supplies of a highly industrialized nation. 
There are many strange things, sir, which have taken place in South Africa, and are taking place, as well as in other parts of Africa, which make no sense to me as an African.  There are wars which take place in Africa, where after an African country has gained its independence from the colonial power, then a force of rebels pick up weapons against that country’s government, but instead of the rebels fighting the government to the bitter end, what happens again and again is that the rebel forces split into various groups which end up fighting not only the government in power, but also each other.  And the result is that, in several African countries, the country is so destroyed that, no matter which party wins, the people lose.  The United Nations are caused to be called in, in order to create some semblance of peace.  In other words, Africans have now started fighting wars which bring about not victory, but the destruction of themselves, as well as their people. 
I would like to draw your attention, sir, to the senseless tide which is still raging in the Sudan, as well as other parts of Africa.  I would like to draw your attention, sir, to the longest and most terrible civil war which is destroying the southern parts of the Sudan.  I would like to draw your attention, and that of your readers, sir, to the terrible war which is destroying Angola.  And one part of the world, to the East of Southern Africa, has been so raped by many years of war that there are now places where you don’t even hear a bird-thing.  All living forms of life have been wiped-out in that place.  Now, why?
And then, I have found that these countries that are being destroyed by senseless wars which are totally out of character for us Africans, and I speak as an African, are those countries which, had they been left alone, could have supplied the whole of Africa with food, with water, and with valuable minerals.  I am told, sir, that under the surface of Angola, under the plains of Angola, are deposits of coal which are without equal in this world.  I am further told that in parts of Angola there are deposits of oil which are second only to those reserves of oil which are in the Middle East.
The Sudan is a country which I visited several times during, and even after, the Second World War.  In the Sudan there was so much food that you received free food from the villagers, as you traveled through the Sudan.  Today, southern Sudan is a starvation-torn, battle of rage hellhole where children die of diarrhea in the bush while the vultures and buzzards wait on the branches of trees to feast.  Africa is being systematically and deliberately destroyed by a power of such relentlessness that it is continuing the destruction even now.
But, this power is getting desperate. 
Martin:  Excuse me.  Did you say there was coal in Angola or gold?
Credo Mutwa:  Coal, sir, coal.  There are diamonds in Angola, sir.  And I have learned from reliable people that there is more oil under Angola, in certain places, than there is in certain parts of the Middle East.
Is this what Africa is being destroyed for?  Is this what our nations are being slaughtered for-for coal under the surface, for diamonds?  If so, who is this intelligence that is behind this?  Are people less valuable than minerals?  Are people less valuable than oil?
Because, sir, genocide, worse than anything that Hitler ever committed upon the Jewish people, is taking place in Africa NOW, and the people of America don’t seem to care a damn.  Why?  We are the best friends that the United States has got.  We are the best people.  We buy American products.  Our children want to look like American children.  Our kids wear jeans, sir, and they even speak with American accents, because you American people are our role model.  Why are you allowing us to be slaughtered?  Why?  Why? 
Not only are we being killed by war, sir, we are being killed by drugs.  There were no drugs in South Africa during the days of the apartheid government.  Now, under our democratic government, our country has become one drug-sodden cess pit.  Why?
Today, sir, and I speak as a traditional shaman, one of my purposes is to try and help people with a drug problem.  Sir, I can help a young African who is abusing marijuana or hashish.  I can help a young African who is dependent upon Dakwa.  But, sir, I am useless, my skills are rubbish and I fail again-and so do many like me-to help young Black people who are addicted to a new type of drug which is called “crack”.  It is a hard-looking drug.  It’s like hardened chocolate when you see it, and this thing is so addictive that no shaman can help a young victim of this drug. 
I am asking the people of the United States of America, I am asking my Black brothers and my Black sisters over there, why are you allowing the country which is your mother to be exterminated?
I don’t care what skeptics say, sir.  Please forgive me when I really get hot under the collar.  I don’t care what skeptics say, but there IS a force destroying Africa and I am not buying the nonsense that it is the bankers of the IMF and other big banks.  You don’t kill the goose that gives you the golden egg, so why would the bankers want to destroy Africa? There is another force behind these people, a terrible, alien force, which does things behind the scenes which-and the sooner we recognize this, the better-sir, it is very common for human beings who are in trouble to blame forces other than those inside themselves.
But, I have studied the situation in Africa since the end of the Second World War, and before, and I have evidence that points to an alien force at work in Africa. 
What, who is wiping out Africa’s oldest tribes? 
Please, sir, let me tell you a thing that cuts my soul.  May I please?
Martin:  Please, continue.
Credo Mutwa:  Please, I’m sorry to talk so much.  Please forgive me.  I belong to the Zulu nation, a nation of warriors, a nation of wise people.  My people, sir, have never been studied by White anthropologists thoroughly, but the Zulu people knew things that, if I were to share with your readers, they would be amazed.
Let me show you this.  The Zulu people KNEW, amongst many things, that it is the Earth which moves around the Sun, and not the other way around.  They said, to explain this thing to the initiated, that the Earth is a feminine creature and the Sun is a male creature, and, therefore, the Earth is the mobile one who dances around the Sun-the beautiful princess who dances around the fiery king who is the Sun.  Our people knew that the Earth was a sphere.  Our people knew about germs and their function.  When the White man came to Africa, where did this incredible knowledge come from?  I do not know. 
The people of America and the people of Europe say that it was Albert Einstein who came out with the idea that time and space are one and the same thing.  My answer to that is, “No!”
My people, the Zulus, knew that space and time was one thing.  In the language of the Zulu, one of the names for space is umkati.  And the Zulu name for time is isikati.  Now, our people knew that space and time were one and the same thing, hundreds of years before Einstein’s birth.
And furthermore, our people believed, like the Dogon people, that there are 24 planets in our part of space which are inhabited by intelligent creatures of various states.  And, this knowledge has never been recorded in any book, and I and my aunt are the only surviving high sanusi  [shaman] in South Africa who are the keepers of this knowledge.   My aunt is still alive.  She is about 90-something years old, and I am now close to dead, suffering from diabetes-a terrible killer of African people nowadays.
And, what I am trying to tell you is that, although my people had this tremendous knowledge, which has never been written down in any book, the Zulu people today, a huge percentage of them, are victims of HIV or outright AIDS.  And it has been calculated, sir, in the next 50 years, fully three-fourths of the Zulu people in Natal are going to die.  And I am the keeper of sacred objects which I inherited from my grandfather.  I am, from my mother’s side, a direct descendant of the last true Zulu king, Dingame.  And, my duty should be to protect my people from anything that threatens their existence. 
Look, please, sir.  Anyone who studies humanity with love, with understanding, and with care, recognizes the fact that there is a shining God which is struggling to be born within each and every one of us.  We are trying to fight back, although many of us are not yet aware of this.  We are developing an attitude of wanting to protect our planet, no matter who or what we are.
There are chiefs in Africa who fine you very heavily if they see you destroying a tree unnecessarily.  This thing was common in the past, but it disappeared with the coming of the White people; but now it has come back again.
Man is becoming, is struggling to become a more advanced, more caring being, and the aliens are not going to take this lying down.  They are going to cause us to kill each other, again.  And I am worried about what is going to happen.
Sir, I can show you many strange things that African people did to protect themselves against the Grey aliens.  The things that our people did were not the result of superstition.  They were the result of terrible personal experience.
One day I hope to share with you, sir, the story of how I got “taken”, we say.  We believe, sir, that the Mantindane (“the tormentor”), the Greys, are really servants of the Chitauli.  And that they, contrary to what White people think-White people think a wrong thing, sir, many-that the Mantindane are experimenting with us.  They are NOT.  I repeat, they are not.
Anyone who has been through the hells of these beings will tell you that there is nothing experimental in what they do.  There is a cold, cold, cold-blooded resolve, and they are not doing what they do to us for themselves, they are doing what they do to us for greater creatures than they are.  Please, sir, can you give me a little time to share with you, briefly, what happened to me?
Martin:  Oh yes, absolutely, please.  We have all the time you need.
Credo Mutwa: Sir, it was an ordinary day, like any other day.  It was a beautiful day in the eastern mountains of Zimbabwe, which are called Inyangani.  These are mountains to the East of Zimbabwe. 
Now, I had been instructed by my teacher to go and find a special herb which we were going to use in the healing of a certain initiate who was badly ill.  And my teacher, a woman called Mrs. Moyo, was Ndebele, from Zimbabwe, once known as Rhodesia.
I was looking for this herb, and I was not thinking about anything, and I had no belief whatsoever in these creatures.   I had never encountered them before, and although we African people believe in many things, I was mighty skeptical, even about certain entities that we believed in at that time, because I had never encountered anything like that before.
And all of a sudden, sir, I noticed that the temperature around me had dropped, although it was a very hot African day.  I suddenly noticed that it was now cold and there was, what appeared to be, a bright blue mist swirling all around me, getting between me and the eastern landscape.  I remember wondering, stupidly, what this thing meant, because I had just begun to dig one of the herbs I had found. 
Suddenly, I found myself in a very strange place, a place that looked like a tunnel lined with metal.  I had worked in mines before, and where I found myself appeared to be a mine tunnel which was lined with silver-greyish metal.
I was lying on what appeared to be a very heavy and very large working bench or a working table, sir.  But yet, I was not chained to the table.  I was just lying there and my trousers were missing, and so were the heavy boots that I always wore when I was out in the bush.  And all of a sudden, in this strange, tunnel-like room, I saw what appeared to be dull, heady-looking, grey, dull-like creatures which were moving toward me. 
There were lights in this place, but not lights as we know them.  They seemed to be patches of glowing stuff.  And there was something above the far entrance which looked like writing, that writing against the silver-grey surface, and these creatures were coming at me but I was hypnotized, just as if the witchcraft had been put upon my head.
But I watched the creatures as they were coming towards me.  I didn’t know what they were.  I was frightened, but I couldn’t move my arms or my legs.  I just lay there like a goat on a sacrificial altar.  And when the creatures came towards me, I felt fear inside me.  They were short creatures, about the size of African Pigmy.  They have very large heads, very thin arms, and very thin legs.
I noticed, sir, because I am an artist, a painter, that these creatures were built all wrong from an artist’s point of view.  Their limbs were too long for their body, and their necks were very thin, and their heads were almost as large as full-grown watermelons.  They had strange eyes, which looked like goggles of some kind.  They had no noses, as we have, only small holes on either side of the raised area between their eyes.  Their mouth had no lips, only thin cuts as if made by a razor. 
And while I was looking at these creatures, sir, in amazed fascination, I felt something close to my head, about my head.  And when I looked up, there was another creature, a slightly bigger one than the other, and it was standing above my head and was looking down at me.
I looked up into its eyes and I was totally hypnotized, and you know, I was spellbound.  I looked into the thing’s eyes and I noticed that the creature wanted me to keep looking into his eyes.  I looked and saw that, through these covers over their eyes, I could see the creature’s real eyes behind this black, goggle-like cover.  It’s eyes were round, with straight pupils, like those of a cat.  And the thing was not moving it’s head.  It was breathing; I could see that.  I could see little nostrils moving, closing and shutting, but sir, if anybody says to me that I smelled like that creature, really, I would konk him one on the face. 
Martin:  (Laughter)
Credo Mutwa:  The creature smelled like nobody’s business.  It had a strange smell, a throat-tightening, chemical smell, which smelled like rotten eggs, and also like hot copper [sulfur], a very strong smell.
And the creature saw me looking at it, and it looked down at me and, all of a sudden, I felt a terrible, awful pain on my left thigh, as if a sword had been driven into my left thigh.  I screamed in pain, horrible, calling out for my mother, and the creature placed it’s hand over my mouth.  You know, sir, it was like-if you want to know how that felt, please sir, take the leg of a chicken, a live chicken, and place it against your lips.  That was how the creature’s hand felt upon my mouth.
It had thin, long fingers, which had more joints than my human fingers have.  And the thumb was in the wrong place.  Each one of the fingers ended in a black claw, almost like certain African birds.  The thing was telling me to be quiet.  And how long the pain went on, sir, I don’t know.  I screamed and I screamed and I screamed, again.
And then, all of a sudden, something was pulled out of my flesh, and I looked down and saw my thigh covered with blood, and I saw that one of the creatures-there were four of them, other than the one standing over my head-they wore tight fitting overalls, which were silvery-grey in color, and their flesh resembled the flesh of certain types of fish that we find in the sea off South Africa.  And the creature standing above my head appeared to be a female.  It was somehow different than the others.  It was taller, bigger, although it didn’t have breasts like a woman, it appeared to be feminine.  And the others appeared to be afraid of it, I don’t know how I can describe this. 
And then, while this terrible thing was going on, another of the creatures came up to me-it walked sideways, in a slightly jerking way, as if it was drunk-it walked up along the table, to my right side, and it stood next to the one standing above my head.  And before I knew what was happening, this creature stuck something that was like a small, silver, ball-point pen with a cable at one end, it pushed this thing, coldly, into my right nostril.
Sir, the pain was out of this world.  Blood splattered all over.  I choked and tried to scream, but the blood got into my throat.  It was a nightmare.  Then, it pulled the thing out and I tried to fight and sit up.
The pain was terrible, but the other thing above my head placed it’s hand upon my forehead and kept me down with very little force.  I was choking and trying to spit out the blood, and then I managed to turn my head to the right to spit out the blood, which I did, and then what the creatures did to me, sir, I don’t know.
All I do know is that the pain went away, and in place of the pain, strange visions flooded my head, visions of cities, some of which I recognized from my travels-but, cities which were half-destroyed, the buildings having their tops blown away, with windows like empty eye-sockets in a human skull.  I saw these visions again and again.  All the buildings that I saw were half-drowned in a reddish, muddish water.
It was as if there had been a flood and the buildings were sticking up out of this great flood, partly destroyed by a disaster of some kind, and it was a terrible sight. 
And then, before I knew it, one of the creatures, the one standing next to my feet, drove something into my organ of manhood, but here there was no pain, just a violent irritation, as if I was making love to something or someone.
And then, when the creature withdrew the thing, which was like a small, black tube which it had forced into my organ of manhood, I did something which produced a strange result, and I did not do it intentionally.  I think it was-my bladder opened, and I urinated straight into the chest of the creature which had pulled the thing out of my organ.
And if I had shot the creature, it would never have reacted as it did.  It jerked away and nearly fell, and then it recovered and staggered away like a drunken insect, and left the room.  I don’t know whether my urine did it; I don’t know.  But that is what happened. 
Then, after a while, the other creatures went away, leaving me with a dull pain in my nostril, with blood on my thigh, and the table wet with urine.  And the thing standing above my head had not moved.  It just stood there with it’s right hand touching it’s left shoulder, in a strangely beautiful and feminine way.  It stood there looking at me.  There was no expression in its face.  I never saw any of the creatures talk or make any sound of any kind.  All I do know is that they appeared to be mute.
And then, out of somewhere there arrived two other creatures, one of which was made entirely out of metal.  Even in my worst nightmares, I still see this creature.  It was tall.  It was big.  And the area in which we were was too small for it.  It walked with a slight stoop, moving forward, and it was definitely not a living thing.  It was a metal creature, a robot of some kind.  And it came and it stood near my feet, its whole body clumsily bent, looking down at me.  There was no mouth.  There was no nose.  There were just two bright eyes, which seemed to change color, and seemed to move somehow, like the crackling of an electrical device. 
And then, behind this huge, bent creature, came a creature which surprised me.  It was very, very, very, very swollen, sir, in appearance.  It had pink skin.  It had a blondish, very human body.  It had very bright, blue, slanting eyes.  It had hair which looked like nylon fiber of some kind.  It had high cheek-bones and an almost human mouth, with full lips and a small, pointed chin.  The creature, sir, was definitely a female but like an artist and a painter, which I am, and also a sculptor, I noticed that the creature was totally out of proportion.  It was wrong.
First, its breasts were thin and pointed, and set too high upon its chest, not where a normal woman’s breasts would be.  Its body was powerful, almost fat, but its legs were too short and its arms were too short in proportion to the rest of its body.  And it came towards me, looked down at me, and before I knew what it was doing, somehow it mated with me.  It was a horrible experience, sir, even worse than what had been done to me before.  But even now, the trauma of that day had affected my life even now, exactly 40 years later. 
And after that, when the creatures had gone, leaving only the one creature which had been standing about my head, the creature standing about my head shook me by the hair, it gripped me by the head and forced me to stand off the table and to get off the table.  I did that, and such was the state that I was in, that I fell onto my knees and hands, onto the floor.
And I noticed that that floor was strange.  It had moving patterns in it, which kept on changing and shifting-purple, red, and greenish patterns, on a metal-grey background.  And the creature pulled me by the hair, again, forcing me to stand up, and it pushed me roughly and made me follow it.
Sir, it would take too long for me to describe what I saw in that strange place, as the creature pushed me, roughly, from room to room.  Even now my mind can’t grasp what it was that I saw.  Amongst many things that I saw were huge cylindrical objects, made of what appeared to be glass of some kind.  And in these object, cylinders, which reached from the roof to the floor of the place we were going through, was what appeared to be a sort-of a greyish-pink liquid.  And in this liquid I saw small editions of the alien creatures floating round and round, like disgusting little frogs, inside this liquid. 
I couldn’t understand what it was that I was being shown.  But then, in the last room I was led through, I saw people, and other strange creatures, which, even now, my mind can’t make head or sense out of, lying on the table.
And I passed a White man, a real White man, who smelled like a human being, was smelling of sweat, urine, excrement, and fear.  This White man was lying on a table like the one I had been lying on, and I looked into his eyes and he looked into mine as I went by. 
And then I found myself out in the bush.  I found that my trousers were missing.  There was a terrible pain in my left thigh.  There was a pain in my penis which was starting to swell, and when I tried to pass water, the pain was excruciating.  I took off my shirt and I used it as a loin-cloth and I walked through the bush. 
I first met a group of young Rhodesian Black people who guided me to my teacher’s village.  And when I arrived outside that village, I smelled so horribly that every dog in the village came yapping and snarling to tear me to pieces.  And it was only my teacher and her other students and the villagers who saved me on that day.  My teacher and the villagers were not at all surprised by what I had to tell them.  They accepted it, sir.  They said to me that what had happened to me had happened to many other people before, and that I was lucky to return alive, because many people have disappeared in that part of the land, never to be seen again-White people, Black people, and so on. 
Sir, I’m cutting a very long story short.  In the year following, 1960, I was delivering parcels in the city of Johannesburg.  You see, I was working in a curio shop, when a White man shouted at me to stop.
I assumed that the White man was a secret policeman who wanted to look into my identity documents.  And when I tried to produce the documents, he told me, angrily, that he didn’t want to see my stinking documents.
Sir, he asked me this question: “Listen, where the hell have I seen you before?  Who are you?” 
I said, “I am nobody, sir; I am just a working man.”
He said, “Don’t bullshit me, man; who the hell are you?  Where did I see you before?” 
And then I looked at him.  I recognized him-his long, straggly, golden-brown hair, his ridiculous mustache and beard.  I remembered him-his blue eyes blood-shot and naked-terror, shining upon his eyes, and his skin as pale as that of a goat.
I said, “Meneer”, which is the African’s way.  “Meneer-I saw you in Rhodesia in a certain place underground.”  And if I had hit that White man with my fist, he wouldn’t have reacted the way he did, sir.   He turned away and walked with a terrible expression, and he disappeared on the other side of the street. 
Now, roughly, this is what happened to me, sir, but it is not a unique experience at all. 
Since that time I met many, many, many people who have had the identical experience that I said, and most of them were traditional Black men and women who can neither read nor write.  They were coming to me to seek my help as a shaman, but I was, myself, looking for somebody wiser than I to tell me what had happened to me, exactly.  Because, sir, when I get caught by the Mantindane, you become so traumatized, your life becomes so changed, you become so embarrassed and ashamed of yourself, you develop a self-hatred which you cannot understand, and there are subtle changes in your life which make no sense to you. 
One: You develop a strange love for humankind.  You want to shake everybody by the shoulders and say,  “Hey, wake-up people; we are not alone.  I know we are not alone!” 
And, you develop a feeling that your life is no longer your own; and furthermore, you become compelled with a strange edge to move from place to place, to travel.  You become worried about the future; you become worried about people.
And another thing, sir, which I hoped one day you would send people to me to see for their own self: you develop knowledge which doesn’t belong to you.  You develop an understanding of space, an understanding of time and creation which makes no sense to you as a human being-it is a state, after your terrible torture, after substances have been removed from you, some kind of exchange takes place where you suddenly know things that the Mantindane would know, which ordinary human beings do not know. 
But, sir, I know that this sharing of God often happens even when-for example, at one time, in 1966, in South Africa, sir, I was arrested and rather savagely interrogated by the security police.  It was that time when every Black intellectual, no matter who he or she was, had a visit from these really nasty guys, who put you to torture, sometimes, who used to put electrical devices on you, and ask you questions, and so on.
Sometimes, when these “human beings” were torturing you, you often used to sense what they were thinking.  Somehow, when you are being tortured by human beings, not by Mantindane only, there is a transference of thought.  For example, when a particularly nasty secret policeman was coming to beat you, you KNEW what he was thinking, even before he burst into the room in which you were held.  You knew that he was coming, and you knew exactly what he was thinking and what he intended to do to you. 
So, this is why I say the strange things that flood my mind.  And what flooded my mind on that day were visions from the mind of the Mantindane.
Since that time-I am a man of only very limited education-I found it hard to speak, let alone to write English.  I take long to say things which people of better English would say in few words.  But, my hands are capable of making things which nobody ever taught me.
I make engines, rocket engines that actually work.  I make guns, of any type I wish, and all people who know me will tell you this and, Mr. David Icke, sir, might show you pictures of what I’ve done around my new home.  I have made large robots out of scrap iron, and some of these robots are going to work.  I don’t know where I acquired this knowledge from.  And since that terrible day, the visions I have seen since I was a child, and the ordinary impressions which I have as a shaman, have grown much more intense. 
I don’t know why, and I want to know the reason why.  But I can tell you, sir, that these creatures, which people wrongly call aliens, are not aliens at all. 
Over many years of looking into this thing, trying to understand it, I can tell you this: that the Mantindane, and the other kinds of alien beings that our people know about, are sexually compatible with human beings.  The Mantindane are capable of impregnating African women.
And I have come across many cases of this during the last 30 years or so.  For example, according to our culture, abortion is regarded as worse than murder.  And if a tribal woman from a rural area in South Africa is found to be pregnant by some unknown person, and then her pregnancy disappears, that, sir, relative to that woman, accuses her of having committed abortion, and yet she denies this, of course.
And because of the fight that results between her and her relatives, the husband’s relatives, then she challenges these people who are accusing her to take her to a sangoma; that is a person like myself.  The sangoma will sometimes examine the woman and, if the sangoma finds that the woman had been pregnant, and had somehow had her fetus removed-a thing which, when it is done by the Mantindane, results in specific injuries to the woman which anyone with experience can recognize-then, the sangoma knows that the woman is telling the truth. 
Also, the smell which clings to people who have been through the hands of the Mantindane, that meticulous man which is unforgetable, always clings to all women who have been impregnated by the Mantindane, no matter how much perfume or powder they try to use. 
So, that is why many such cases land on the doorstep of my life.  Sangomas bring such people to me in large numbers, because they think I am the best one to help in such problems. 
So, in the last 40 years or so, I have received many women who have actually been impregnated by the Mantindane and their pregnancies mysteriously terminated, leaving the woman feeling defiled, feeling guilty, and rejected by her family.  It becomes my duty to convince the family of the woman’s innocence, to try and heal the terrible spiritual and mental-as well as physical-trauma that the woman has undergone, and to otherwise help her and her members of the family, and forget what happened. 
No, sir; if these aliens are from a far away planet, why are they able to impregnate women?  And why did that strange creature, which was naked, with red pubic hair, which climbed over me on that working table, why did it have an organ which, though slightly different from that of a normal woman, was still a recognizable female organ?
The creature’s organ was in the wrong place.  It was slightly more in the front, where that of normal woman is between the legs.  But it was recognizable, and it looked like a female organ.  It had hair like a woman’s organ. 
So, sir, I believe that these so-called aliens don’t come from far away at all.  I believe that they are here with us, and I believe that they need substances from us, just as some of us human beings use certain things from wild animals, such as monkey glands, for certain selfish purposes of our own.
I believe, sir, that we should study this dangerous phenomenon very, very, clearly and with objective minds. 
Far too many people fall into the temptation of looking upon these “aliens” as supernatural creatures.  They are just solid creatures, sir.  They are like us; and, furthermore, I’m going to make a statement here which will come as a surprise: the Grey aliens, sir, are edible.  Surprised?
Martin:  Please continue.
Credo Mutwa:  I said, sir, the Grey aliens are edible.
Martin:  Yes, I heard that and I’m anxious to....
Credo Mutwa:  Their flesh is protein, just as animal flesh on Earth is, but, anyone who ingests Grey alien flesh comes very, very close to death.  I nearly did.
You see, in Lesotho there is a mountain called Laribe; it is called the Crying Stone mountain.   On several occasions, in the last 50 years or so, alien craft have crashed against this mountain.
And one last incident was reported in the newspapers not so long ago.  An African who believes that these creatures are gods, when they find the corpse of a dead Grey alien, they take it, put it in a bag, and drag it into the bush, where they dismember it and ritually eat it.  But some of them die as a result of ingesting that thing. 
About a year before I had the experience from the Inyangani Mountains, I had been given, by a friend of mine in Lesotho, flesh from what he called a sky god.  I was skeptical.
He gave me a small lump of grey, rather dry stuff, which he said was the flesh.  And he and I and his wife ritually ate this thing, one night.  After we had eaten this thing, sir, on the following day, exactly, our bodies erupted into a rash which was like nothing I had experienced in my life before.
Our bodies were so full of the rash and urticaria, it was as if we had small pox.  We itched, the itching was horrible, especially under the arm-pits and between the legs, and the buttocks.  Our tongues began to swell.  We could not breathe.  And for a number of days, my friend, his wife and I were totally helpless, secretly attended by initiates who were studying under my friend, who was a shaman. 
I came very close to death.  There was bleeding from nearly every orifice in our body.  We passed blood, much blood when we went to the toilet.  We could barely walk, barely breathe.  And after about 4 or 5 days, the rash subsided, then the pealing of the skin took its place now.  Our skins began to peal, in scales like that of a snake shedding it’s skin. 
Sir, it was one of the most terrible experiences I had undergone.  In fact, when I began to feel better, I think that my being abducted by the Mantindane was the direct result of my having ingested flesh from one of these creatures.  I had not believed that what my friend was giving me was flesh from a creature.  I assumed it was some kind of root or herb or whatever.  But, afterwards, I recalled the taste of the thing.  It had a coppery taste, and had the same type of smell that I was to encounter in 1959. 
And, after the rash went down-while I was still peeling and we were smeared from head to foot with coconut oil by the initiates,  every day-a strange change came over us, sir, which I am asking all people of knowledge who would read this in your country to try and explain to me.  We went crazy, sir, utterly crazy.
We started laughing like real loony tunes.  It was ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha, day after day-for the slightest things we started laughing our heads off, for hours, until you were nearly exhausted.
And then the laughing went away; and then a strange thing happened, a thing which my friend said was the goal which those who ate the flesh of a Mantindane wanted to achieve.
It was as if we had ingested a strange substance, a drug, a drug like no other on this Earth.  Suddenly, our feelings were heightened.
When you drank water, it was as if you had drunk a wine of some kind.  Water became as delicious as a man-made drink.  Food began to taste amazingly.  Every feeling was heightened, and it’s indescribable-it was as if I was one with the very heart of the universe.  I cannot describe it any other way.
And this feeling of amazing intensity of feeling lasted for over 2 months.  When I listened to music, it was as if there was music behind the music, behind the music.  When I painted pictures-which is what I do for a living-and when I was holding a particular color on the tip of my brush, it was as if there were other colors in that color.  It was an indescribable thing, sir.  Even now I cannot describe it.  But let me now, sir, go to something else.
The Mantindane are not the only alien beings that we Africans have seen and know about, and have got stories to tell about.
Many, many, many centuries ago, before the first White-man came to Africa, we African people encountered a race of alien beings which looked exactly like the European White-man who were going to invade Africa in our future.
These alien creatures are tall.  Some of them are rather well built, like athletes, and they have slightly slanting blue eyes and high cheek-bones.  And they have got golden hair, and they look exactly like the Europeans of today, with one exception: their fingers are beautifully made, long and like those of musicians and artists. 
Now, these creatures came to Africa out of the sky, in craft which looked like the boomerang of the Australian people.  Now, when one of these craft comes down to land, it creates a whirlwind of dust, which makes a very large sound indeed, like that of a tornado.  In the language of some African tribes, a whirlwind is zungar-uzungo. 
Now, our people gave several names to these White-skinned aliens.  They called them Wazungu, a word which loosely means “god” but literally means “people of the dust-devil or the whirlwind”.
And, our people were familiar with these Wazungu from the start.   They saw them, and they saw that some-in fact, many-of these Wazungu carry what appears to be a sphere made of crystal or glass, a sphere which they always playfully bounce like a ball in their hands.  And when a force of warriors tries to capture a Wazungu, the Wazungu throws this ball into the air, catches it in his hands, and then disappears.
But, some Wazungu were captured by Africans in the past and forcibly kept prisoner in the villages of chiefs, and in the caves of shamans.  The person who had captured the Muzungu, as he is called in singular, had to make sure that he kept the glass-globe well-hidden from the Wazungu.  So long as he kept the globe hostage, the Muzungu could not escape.
And when Africans saw the real Europeans, the White men from Europe, they transferred to them the name Wazungu.  Before we met the people from Europe, we Africans, we had met White-skinned Wazungu, and we transferred the name Wazungu to the real Europeans, from the aliens. 
Now, in the Zulu language, we call a White man Umlungu.  Now, the word Umlungu means exactly the same as Wazungu, “a god or a creature which creates a big whirlwind underground”. 
In Zaire, called now the Democratic Republic of the Congo, White people are called Watende or Walende.  This, again, means “a god or a White creature”.  And, the word Watende not only is used to refer to the pink-skinned alien, but is also used to refer to the field Chitauli.  In Zaire, when shamans talk fearfully about the lords who control the Earth, they refer to them not as Chitauli, but they refer to them euphemistically as Watende-wa-muinda-that is, “the White creature which carries a light” because at night the Chitauli’s forehead eyes glow like red lights in the dense bush.  They glow like the rear lights of an automobile in the dense bush.  So, a Watende-wa-muinda “the White creature of the light”, that is what the Chitauli are called in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. 
There are over 24 other alien creatures, sir, that we Africans know about, but I will tell you briefly, now, about only two. 
 --------------------------------------------------------------
Sir, in the country called Zimbabwe, where I had my encounter in 1959, there is also another creature.  This is the most amazing creature, and I saw it once, and so did several other people, some Black and some White, who were with me.  This creature is a huge creature, and shaped exactly like a gorilla, but it is unlike a gorilla, which often walks on its feet, as well as on its knuckles.  The creature I'm talking about, sir, stands about 8 feet or 9 feet high, and is built exactly like a gorilla, but its body is very powerful.  Its shoulders are very wide, it's neck is very thick.  It is covered with thick, rough fur, like no other wild animal in Africa.
It is a humanoid creature, with thighs and legs and feet, as well as arms and hands which look exactly like those of a human being, only covered with a heavy mat of dark-brown fur.  This creature, sir, is known as Ogo by the people of Zimbabwe.  And schools of people have seen this creature,  hundreds over the many generations.  Some of these creatures have been seen right here in South Africa, in isolated bushy and mountainous places.  And these Ogo are, detail for detail, exactly like what the Native American people of the Northwestern United States call a Sasquatch or Bigfoot.
In fact, I say it is the same creature and we have it right here in southern Africa.  It is also exactly the same creature, but with a totally different skin color, as the one that is seen by the people of Nepal on the slopes of the Himalaya mountains, the creature that is called a Yeti. 
Now, then, the last creature, sir, a creature which is so well known in South Africa, and elsewhere in Africa, that if you mention its name, people smile.  It is called a Tokoloshe.  Every African knows what aTokoloshe is.  Some call it Tikoloshe.
It looks like a very nasty looking teddy-bear in appearance, in that it's head is like that of a teddy-bear, but it has got a thick, sharp, bony ridge on top of its head.  The ridge goes from above its forehead to the back of its head, and with this ridge it can knock down an ox by butting it with its head.
This creature causes the Black people in certain places to raise their beds on bricks, one brick laid on top of the other one, about 3 feet above the ground.  And you find this all over South Africa.  ThisTokoloshe likes to play with children, and has been seen hundreds of times by school children, in various parts of South Africa, even in recent times.
Sometimes it will terrorize children by scratching them as they sleep, leaving long, parallel scratches on a child's back and upon a child's thighs, scratches that become infected and itch terribly. 
About two years ago, a creature like this terrorized a whole school of children in Soweto, near Johannesburg.  And the school children called it pinky-pinky.  Now, this creature is not only known in South Africa amongst Black people, it is also known, sir, amongst Polynesian people of Hawaii, and other islands in the Pacific.  These people lift their huts, their grass houses, on stilts, to the height exactly that Africans lift their bed.  When you ask a Polynesian, 'Why do you built your huts like this?'  The Polynesian will say, 'We want to protect ourselves from Tiki.'
Now, this is interesting, sir-that a creature exactly like the one seen in South Africa is also seen on some Pacific islands, and the name by which it is known in the Pacific, Tiki, is very close to the African wordTikiloshe, or Tokoloshe. 
One day I hope to share more of this information with your readers, but my appeal, again, is this:  Please investigate!  Please, let us investigate!  Let us stop being too skeptical.  Excessive skepticism is just as dangerous and as evil as gullibility. 
Nobody can tell me that aliens don't exist.  Let someone tell me, what is the meaning of this hole in my side?  Let someone tell me, why is it that after I had been mated to that strange creature, in that strange place, my organ of manhood swelled horribly, and for many years after that I couldn't make love to an ordinary woman, properly.  Why?  If that was a figment of my imagination, how can a figment of one's imagination leave you with scars and cracks on your male organ, some of which have not healed to this date?  Let such people answer me that question. 
We must investigate, sir, because there is every sign that the alien creatures sharing this planet with us are getting desperate.  Why?  Because, you see, there is a great fight shaping up, and anyone who thinks deeply about such things can see this fight coming.
What am I talking about?  Sir, until 30 or 40 years ago, very few people cared about the environment.  Very few people were concerned about the destruction of the rain forests in Africa and elsewhere.  Very few people were concerned when White hunters, who, at that time were regarded as heroes, massacred Africa's animals in the thousands.  Very few people were concerned when the great nations of the world, such as the United States, Russia, Britain, and France, openly tested nuclear weapons in many parts of the world.
Today there are people who would spit at a big-game hunter if he showed himself in a hotel and announced what he was.  Today a big-game hunter is no longer looked upon as a hero, but rather as a murderer.  Today there are men and women, Black and White, who are prepared to risk their lives to save trees, to save animals, and to stop the insanity of testing nuclear weapons.
Sir, what does this tell you?  It tells you that, after many thousands of years of being dominated by alien creatures, human beings are starting to fight back.  Human beings are starting to care about the world in which they live and in which they find themselves.  But, the aliens, the Chitauli, the Mantindane-call them what you will-are not going to take that lying down.  They are going to punish us, as they did centuries before. 
The aliens once destroyed a nation whose name has come down to us Africans as the nation of Amariri.  It is said that the kings of Amariri, this fabulous country which we believed lay beyond the setting of the Sun, were refusing to do what the Chitauli were telling them to do.
The kings, at that time, were refusing to sacrifice their children to the Chitauli.  They were refusing to make war on fellow human-beings, in order to sustain the Chitauli, with their god's image.
It is said that the Chitauli brought down a fire from Heaven.  They took fire from the Sun itself and they used it to burn that great civilization away.  They caused earthquakes and tidal waves and destroyed the great civilization of the Red people of the long green hair, who are said to have been the first people ever to be created on this Earth.  It is said that the Chitauli allowed only a few surviving people to escape the destruction of Amariri, and that they are prepared to do this again in the very near future.
I'm worried about what is going to happen in other countries in the world.  All these earthquakes, which have caused the destruction of human life in the Middle East and in parts of Africa and India, why does my heart feel frightened when I read about all this?  These earthquakes are happening with unnatural regularity now, in Egypt, in Armenia, and one of these earthquakes was so powerful, it went right through the planet Earth and caused a very sacred rock in Namibia, a rock known as the Finger of God, which has been standing for tens of thousands of years, to collapse in a heap of rubble.  And when that rock collapsed, I received many worried letters from sangomas who believed that because this rock had fallen, then the end of the world was very, very near. 
Is there a question, please?
Martin:  I read your poem, your pledge.  In your pledge you mention the name Jabulon.  Can you explain who that is?
Credo Mutwa:  Jabulon, sir, is a very strange god.  He is supposed to be the leader of the Chitauli.  He is a god, to my great surprise, which I find certain groups of White people, especially, worshipping.  We have known about Jabulon for many, many centuries, we Black people.  But I am surprised that there are White people who worship this god, and these people, amongst them are people whom many have blamed for all the things that have happened on this Earth, namely, the Freemason people.  We believe that Jabulon is the leader of the Chitauli.  He is the Old One.  And one of his names, in the African language, sir, is Umbaba-Samahongo-'the lord king, the great father of the terrible eyes'-because we believe that Jabulon has got one eye which, if he opens it, you die if he looks at you.
It is said, sir, the Umbaba ran away from an eastern land during a power struggle with one of his sons, and he took refuge in Central Africa, where he hides in a cave, deep underground.  And it is an amazing thing, sir-it is said that under the Mountains of the Moon in Zaire is this great city of copper, of many thousands of shining buildings.  There dwells the god Umbaba or Jabulon.  And this god is waiting for the day when the surface of the Earth will be cleared of human beings so that he, and his children, the Chitauli, can come out and enjoy the heat of the Sun. 
And, one day, sir, I had a very unexpected visit while I was living in Soweto, near Johannesburg.  I was visited by priests from Tibet.
One of these priests, I'm sure you have met him or you know of him.  His name is Akyong Rinpochce.  He is one of the leading Tibetan priests in England who was exiled with the Dalai Lama, and he visited me one day while I was in my medicinal village in Soweto.  And one of the things that Akyong Rinpochce asked me was, 'Do I know of a secret city which is somewhere in Africa, a city made of copper?' 
I said, 'But, Akyong, you are describing the city of Umbaba, the city of the unseen god, the god who hides underground.  How do you know about this?'  And Akyong Rinpochce, who is a very serious investigator of strange phenomena, told me that at one time the great Lama left Tibet with a group of followers and came to Africa searching for this city.  And the Lama, and his followers, were never seen again.  They never returned back to Tibet.
Now, sir, we have got stories in central and southern Africa about little Yellow men who came to Africa looking for the city of Umbaba, the city from which you cannot return alive.  What is amazing, sir-I don't know whether this falls within the orbit of your newspaper, but-there are very, very disturbing stories which I have followed-up here in South Africa, stories which make no sense to me. 
(Break for a few minutes.)
Credo Mutwa:  Hello.
Martin:  Yes, Credo.  May I just say that I am very appreciative of your taking this time to talk with me, and I realize it's difficult.
Credo Mutwa:  I appreciate the honor that you are doing me, much more than you realize.  And I know how White people often treat anyone who talks on the subject that I am talking about, as weird. 
Sir, I really shouldn't be exposing myself to public ridicule, as I am, but, our people ARE DYING!  Not only do we have problems with drugs in southern Africa, not only do we have problems with crime in my country, which is getting a thousand times more vicious than it ever was before, not only do we have problems with AIDS, sir, but we also have got weird problems which often come our way-problems which, when you study them together, show you that something unearthly is going on in southern Africa.  Can I share this thing with you, sir?
Martin:  Yes, please.
Credo Mutwa:  Sir, according to my culture it is very rude for one man simply to talk to another man without giving that other man the chance to talk back to him.  So, out of respect of your paper and of you, I would like to ask you, in your country, the United States, do you have strange stories about underground structures which are built-because we are having similar stories in South Africa, and with us they are having very strange results, indeed.
Martin:  Yes, there are many stories of underground-we call them underground bases, actually, and, in fact, in the newspaper I was associated with earlier, we published an entire edition on exposing the locations of those underground bases.  Not only that....
Credo Mutwa:  There is exactly the same thing here in South Africa, and there has been for a number of years.  I was able to confirm one to my own satisfaction, but I have failed to confirm others.  You see, sir, a man like me, who walks two worlds-the African mystical world, as well as the modern, down-to-Earth world-must be careful of what he says.  But, about 5 years ago, I was living in the little town of Masikeng, a very historical town which was the site of a famous siege by the Boors, in the war of 1899-1902.
It was in this town, sir, that the Scout movement, the Boy Scout movement, was founded by Captain Powell.  I'm sure you've heard about him.  But, while I was living in Masinkeng, a number of people came to me, ordinary tribesmen and women, sir, some of them totally illiterate.  These people complained to me that their relatives had mysteriously disappeared.  They wanted me to divine where their relatives have gone to.  And, I asked these people, all of whom did not know each other, where did your relatives disappear?
These people had told me an incredible story, and it was this:  Not far from Masikeng there is a famous place which I'm sure you have heard about, a place which we call the Las Vegas of South Africa.  This is the famous casino/hotel complex called Sun City.
Martin:  Yes.
Credo Mutwa:  I was told that under Sun City strange mining operations were in progress, deep underground, and that many of the Africans who worked in those mines disappeared and never returned home again, although their paychecks kept on being sent to their family.  The men never returned home, as ordinary miners do.
Now, I looked into this phenomenon, sir, and, like a fool, I refused to believe it.  And then more stories came my way, because when an African is in deep trouble, he or she always looks for a sangoma to find the reason behind the trouble. 
Sir, the other story was this, and this one I found to be a shocking truth-that there was construction across the border from South Africa, in the land known as Botswana.  There, the Americans were working with African labor, who had been sworn to secrecy.  The Americans were building there a secret airport which can take modern jet fighters.  Now, I couldn't believe this.  Again, I was told that many had mysteriously disappeared there-ordinary tribesmen, sir, not even educated Black people; ordinary workers have gone missing.  And when their relatives try to find out where they had gone, they are met with stone-cold silence. 
Now, I wanted to have a look at this thing, and one thing that made me act was that a strange story swept through South Africa, that a South African jet aircraft, a jet fighter, had shot down a flying saucer.  And the jet fighter had been scrambled from this secret base.
Now, sir, I decided to investigate because my credibility as a shaman and as a sangoma was at stake.  I went to Botswana.  It was very easy.  You can still cross through the wire and get into that country.  The borders are not as heavily sealed in certain places as many people would think.
I went there with some friends and I found that there was such a base in Botswana, not underground, but on the surface.  It is an aircraft base, but Black people are afraid of even being seen near there because it is said that you will disappear if you get too close to the place, and the man who took us there didn't want to come near that place.  I studied it from far away, and it does exist, and the man said if we got any nearer to the place, we would disappear.  Which is a very odd thing, sir, because there are many military bases all over South Africa, and in Botswana, but this particular one fills the local people with deep terror.  Why this would be so, I'm still struggling to find out, even now, because there are too many strange things going on in my country, and they are affecting the lives of many of our people very badly indeed. 
Now, there is another thing, sir:  It is that one of the things that the Chitauli like to do in their underground caves, where many fires are always kept ablaze, we are told, is that when a Chitauli gets sick and starts to lose a large area of skin on his body, it is said that there is a disease that the Chitauli suffer from which causes them to lose large areas of their skin, leaving only raw flesh.
When the Chitauli gets sick this way, a young girl, a virgin, is usually kidnapped by the servant of the Chitauli and is brought to the underground place.  There the girl is bound, hand and foot, and wrapped in a golden blanket, and is forced to lie next to the Chitauli, the sick Chitauli, week after week, being well fed and well cared for, but kept bound hand and foot, and only released at certain times to relieve herself.   It is said that after the sick Chitauli shows signs of getting better, then the human girl is manipulated into trying to escape.  She is given a chance to escape, a chance which is really not a chance.  Then, when the girl escapes, she runs, but she is pursued over a long distance underground by flying creatures which are made of metal, and she is recaptured when she reaches the height of fear and exhaustion.
Then she is laid on an altar, usually a rough rock, flat on top.  Then, she is cruelly sacrificed, sir, and her blood is drunk by the sick Chitauli, which then recovers.  But, the girl must not be sacrificed until she is very, very, very frightened, because if she is not frightened, it is said that her blood will not save the sick Chitauli.  It must be the blood of a very frightened human being, indeed. 
Now, this habit of chasing a victim was also practiced by ordinary African cannibals, sir.  In Zulu-land, in the last century, there were cannibals who used to eat people, and their descendants, even today, will tell you, if they trust you, that the flesh of the human being who has been frightened and made to run over a great distance, while trying to escape, tastes far better than the flesh of someone who was simply killed. 
Now, sir, some time ago here in South Africa-and it is still an ongoing process-5 White girls disappeared.  They were school-girls, sir.  These school-girls were, every one of them, a highly talented child-either a child who showed signs of developing spiritual power, or a child who was a leader of her class in one particular thought or subject of learning.  Five such children disappeared in South Africa.  It was a very big story in the newspaper and, at one time, White people came to me and persuaded me to try and trace these children.
And one day a White man brought to me a rubber toy belonging to a White child who had disappeared.  And I took the rubber toy in my hands and I noticed that the creature's eyes appeared to move.  It was as if the rubber toy, a toy dinosaur, was about to burst into tears.  I felt very bad, as if I could stand up and run away.  And then I told this White man, 'Listen to me: The child who held this toy is dead.  What are you trying to do to me?  This child is dead.  I feel it.'
And the White man, who was a television producer, took the toy, the school books, and the jersey, and he went away.  And, sure enough, the White school child was found dead, buried in a shallow grave next to a road.
Now, other people came to me asking for my help in finding their missing children.  Are they dead?  Are they alive?  Before I could do anything, sir-at that time I still had a telephone in my home-my telephone started ringing and people with very angry voices, White people voices, shouted at me and told me to stop helping those people.  They told me that if I don't stop, acid would be thrown into my wife's face, and that my children would be murdered, one after the other.
And, sure enough, sure enough, my youngest son was brutally stabbed, almost to death, one day, by mysterious people whom his friends later told me had been White-skinned people.  And so, I stopped, sir.
I am told, reliably, that over 1,000 children disappear in South Africa, almost every month.  And they disappear, never to be seen again.  Many people, especially in the newspaper field, think that this is the result of child prostitution rackets.  But I do not think so.  The children-if you check the history of many of these children, they were not ordinary street children, sir.  They are school children who stand out in their class, because of certain subjects at which they are good, or, who stand out in their class because of thoughts which they are good at.
Not only that, sir, but ordinary women have disappeared this way, in Masikeng, also, at more or less the same time that the 5 White children disappeared.  In Masikeng, two Black school teachers, female school teachers, disappeared in their car and were never seen again.  But I don't want to burden you, sir, with this terrible story.
But let me tell you one last thing:  After the disappearance of the 5 White school children, the police arrested a priest, a reverend of the White Reform Church, Reverend Van Rooyen.  It was said that it was Van Rooyen who was responsible for the disappearance of these poor White school kids.  And, he had been assisted by his girlfriend, who hand-picked these children.  Before Van Rooyen could appear in court, a very strange thing happened.  He and his girlfriend were shot in their little vehicle, a little 4x4 truck.  And, after they had been shot, the truck managed to come to a stop-a thing that a moving truck never does-and I was told, afterwards, by a White woman who knew Van Rooyen, that Van Rooyen and his woman had not committed this crime as the police had said to the newspapers.
They had actually been murdered.  Why?  Because Van Rooyen was found with a gunshot wound in his right temple, and yet, all of the people who knew him knew that he had been a left-handed man.  So, who murdered Van Rooyen and his woman?  It is one of the biggest and the ugliest mysteries in South Africa to date. 
There is more, much more along these lines, but I won't waste your time with it. 
Martin:  When we were talking about the Greys, you talked about the Chitauli.  You had described them, the reptilians-now correct me if I'm wrong-were you describing them as tall, thin, large-headed, large-eyed beings?
Credo Mutwa:  Yes, sir.  They are tall.  They walk with a-you see, the Grey aliens walk with a jerking motion, sir, as if there is something wrong with their legs.  But, the Chitauli walk very gracefully, like trees gently swaying in the wind.
They are tall.  They have large heads.  Some of them have got horns all around their heads.   Now, let me express amazement, there exists-that in one of the films that recently appeared in South Africa, a Star Wars film, the latest one, shows a character EXACTLY like a Chitauli, exactly!  It's got horns all around it's head.  These are the warrior Chitauli.
The royal Chitauli have got no horns around their head, but have got a darker ridge reaching from above their forehead to their back.  They are very graceful creatures, we are told, sir, but they have got-their little finger is a claw which is a very sharp, straight claw, which they use to punch into human noses, in order to drink human brains in one of their rituals.
Martin:  Now, are they fair skinned?
Credo Mutwa:  They are not pink skinned.  They are white-skinned, like paper, almost like certain types of cardboard.  Their skin is like that, it is the skin, definitely, of scaly, reptile-like creatures.  Their foreheads are very large, bulging, and they look highly, highly intelligent. 
Martin:  Now, it's been said-I've heard that these beings are very controlling and they thrive on 'divide and conquer'.
Credo Mutwa:  Yes, they do, sir.  They set human being against human being.  I could give you many amusing examples, using some African language, how the Chitauli are said to have divided human beings.  They like-do you know who they like, sir?  They like religious fanatics.
Martin:  (Laughter)
Credo Mutwa:  Ones who are burdened by too much religion are very popular with the Chitauli
Martin:  Well, now, I can't help but wonder if the Chitauli are prevalent in the United States because of the large number of underground bases.  In the United States, alone, the numbers of missing children are so astronomically high that the White-slave trade does not answer those questions.
Credo Mutwa:  Yes, sir, I agree.  But, I'm sorry, sir, I feel that it is in Africa that something very funny is designed to happen.  Let me tell you what happened to me, recently, sir.  We still have a little time.  I won't be long, one minute or less. 
Martin:  No, no-that's fine. 
Credo Mutwa:  When I started talking to Mr. David Icke, and it was (when) Mr. Icke started speaking about me in Cape Town, I received a visit from 3 White people who pretended to be from South America.  These people told me that something is going to happen on the 9th of this month, on 9-9-99.  They said that this was going to happen in Lake Titicaca, a place which I once visited about 2 years ago.
Martin:  A very special place.
Credo Mutwa:  Yes, sir.  And then, these people told me, when we were speaking-these people, sir, speaking through an interpreter-told me that Africa is the country where something is going to happen soon which will decide the fate of all humankind. 
And then, we parted on very friendly words, sir, but these people had left me a letter which I did not open until a few hours after they had left.  And in this letter was written that I should not attend David Icke's talk, and that a strange person called Alia Czar was watching me.  I don't know who Alia Czar is.
And they said to me-these people had said to me when we met-that they were under a great lord called Melchizedek.  And, after I'd read this threatening letter, which threatened that if I talked, my wife, who is sick of cancer in hospital, is going to die if I talked.  Then, I began to wonder.  Who were these people?
Then, because I've been to South America before, I found that the Spanish language with which they were speaking was different from the language, the Spanish which is spoken in South America.  These people were using Spanish from Spain, and not the slightly weakened Spanish from South America. 
Even now, sir, that threat is still hanging over my head and, may I point out, sir, a strange thing which whoever you will send to me one day will see for themself: my wife is sick of cancer in the hospital, which is the largest hospital in South Africa, sir.  And in one of the x-rays taken of my wife's womb, a strange metal device was seen-of a kind which has puzzled doctors.  I spoke to my wife.  I asked her, 'Who put this object, which the x-rays have seen, in her womb.' 
My wife said nobody had ever touched her, and nobody had ever inserted anything into her.  But this artifact, sir, which is clearly marked in the x-ray, and is clearly indicated with an arrow, is first seen in one x-ray plate, disappears for the next 2 plates, and is seen on the 4th plate again.  I've been wondering very, very much about this. 
No matter what we may think, sir, there are strange things going on in this world and they require an agent, investigation, and explanation.  What is this strange device, which the doctors cannot identify, doing inside the uterus of a 65-year-old woman?  My wife is suffering, and I can lose her at any time now, because I can't even get her out of hospital.   Who put this device in her uterus, and why?  I will never know the answer, not in this world. 
Martin:  I'm very sorry to hear about your wife having cancer.  I just lost my mother last year to cancer and I know that is a very painful struggle. 
Credo Mutwa:  Yes, sir, it is.
Martin:  So, I am very sorry that you are going through that.
Credo Mutwa:  Through the training as a Zulu step-son warrior, we have got something like the Japanese Samuri which we call the Kaway, which is a Sun warrior.  When a Sun warrior, who is trained like I am, undergoes a terrible experience, he must channel the pain caused by that experience into cold, battle anger, in order to overcome the grief he feels.
And, at this moment, sir, I am aggrieved about what is happening in my country; about what's happening to my people; about what's happening to my wife, who is also my half-sister.  You see, ours is what was called a sacred marriage between a man, a sanusi, a shaman, and his half-sister.  And, the wife I'm about to lose is my half-sister.  Our father is one man, although our mothers were different.
You know, sir, I feel a cold rage that Africa is being destroyed.  I feel, sir, a cold rage that my people are being destroyed by forces which, when you study them, you find are totally alien.  And, here, let me share with you, sir, one last thing, please, which will make your readers understand why I am feeling what I am feeling now. 
As you know, sir, there is AIDS going like a silent fire through South Africa.  And, last year, I found, to my horror, that one of my six children, my 21-year-old daughter, is HIV positive.  Sir, I feel a cold rage in my heart that we are allowing an alien disease that came from we know not where, a disease which anyone, with any thought, realizes was manufactured somewhere in order to destroy large swaths of humankind.
When I look into my daughter's eyes, sir, I feel a chill.  I've got two daughters, grown-up, young women, and she is the last.  The other one is short and dumpy, and a loving-a lovely African girl with a big backside and big breasts.  But this girl, who is dying of this disease, is slender, dark-skinned like my mother, and she is very beautiful, even by European standards-and I cannot look into my child's eyes and see what I read there: a resignation, a why?  Why?
If AIDS was a natural disease, sir, I would accept it, because man must live side-by-side with illness in this world.   But a child, you spend years educating and bringing-up, suddenly being snuffed-out before your eyes, by a disease made by evil people, I want to tear somebody's eyes out for what I've seen happening.  I'm sorry, sir.
Martin:  I understand.
Credo Mutwa:  We must look into this thing.  Is there one last question you would like to ask?
Martin:  Yes.  I would like to go back to the copper city for a moment.  It would seem that this Jabulon would be the equivalent of what, in the West, we call Satan.  Would you say that?
Credo Mutwa:  I think so, yes, sir.  He is the chief of the Chitauli.  And, like Satan, he lives in a house underground where great fires are always lighted, to keep him warm.  Because, we are told, that after the great war they fought with God, they became cold in their blood and they cannot stand freezing weather, which is why they require human blood, and also they require fire always to be kept working where they are.
Martin:  Well it's been said, in the recent video tape that David Icke has put out, that the shape-shifting reptilians, in order to maintain their facade, their cover, their human-like appearance, they must drink human blood.  And there is something about the blond gene, apparently.  Now, I don't know what...
Credo Mutwa:  Yes.  Mr. David Icke shared that a little with me, sir.  He told me that, repeatedly, golden-haired people get sacrificed by the Chitauli , and then I told him, in my turn, what I know from Africa.
You see, sir, not all Africans have got black hair.  There are Africans who are regarded as very holy, as very sacred.  These are Africans who are born with natural red hair.  These Africans are believed to be very spiritually powerful.  Now, in Africa, such people, albeamers or red-headed Africans, were the most victims of sacrifice, especially when they were just entering maturity-whether they were males or females.
Martin:  Now, when you were able to see the eyes beneath the Grey alien's exterior, would you say that those were reptilian beings underneath that cover? 
Credo Mutwa:  Yes, sir, exactly.  I will tell you why.  There is a snake here in South Africa which is called a Mamba.
Martin:  Yes, very deadly.
Credo Mutwa:  It is one of the most poisonous snakes that you can find.  It has got eyes EXACTLY like those of a Chitauli and of a Mantindane.  And so has a Python, sir.  A crocodile's eyes are very ET-looking, and they don't look as hypnotic and as piercing as those of a Mamba or a Python.  If you can image, sir, the eye of a Python, magnified about 10 times, then you have got exactly what a Chitauli'seyes look like. 
Martin:  Well, it is said, and I believe this to be true, that there is a-for lack of a better way of putting it-there is a war between Light and Dark, Good and Evil, on this planet.
Credo Mutwa:  Yes.  Yes, sir.  Yes, sir.  Yes.
Martin:  And there certainly is a God in His Universe, a God of Light and Justness.
Credo Mutwa:  Yes, sir.
Martin:  How does your culture, how do you view the intervention of God through His Hosts, through His Representatives?  In all things there must be a balance, and that includes on planet Earth-as above, so below.  How do you see-for many readers, they can read about this all, and it sounds very frightening and very, almost, hopeless-and yet, there certainly is hope.  So, I would like to end this interview on a message of hope.
Credo Mutwa:  Yes.  Please, sir, there IS hope!  Look, first of all, there IS a God above us.  And this God is more real than most of us believe.  God is not a figment of someone's imagination.  God is not something dreamt-up by old men and old women in prehistoric times.  God exists, sir.  But standing between us and God are creatures who claim to be gods.  And these creatures we must get rid of in order to get closer to God. 
Sir, I have lived a long and very strange life, and I can tell you that there is a God, and He is intervening.  However, we see God's intervening as slow, but wait:  Who would have thought that less than 30 years ago, not one person cared about the environment.  Who put this sudden Godliness within all of us?
Today, sir, people everywhere in the world are standing up and fighting for the rights of women and for the rights of children.  Who has put these ideas into our minds?  Not the Chitauli, not any demonic entity, it is God acting in the shadow and making us strong and able to resist these ugly creatures. 
You see, sir, God seems to work slowly in our eyes, because God lives in a time-sphere totally different from our own.  God is there.  God is working.  And it is God, sir, who, for the first time in our existence, is making us aware of these things, making us aware that on this world we are not alone, and that we must be soul-ly and solely responsible for our actions, and we must neutralize these alien beings who for years have led us around in circles.
Human beings have never known any real progress, sir, because there have been forces that have been stopping us from reaching our rightful position in the universe, and I mean the Chitauli, I mean theMantindane, I mean the Midzimu.  We must stop regarding these creatures as super-human creatures.  They are just parasites who need us more than we need them.  And only a fool will ever deny the fact that we are not the only intelligent species of being that this planet has produced. 
All over Africa there is overwhelming evidence that once there were gigantic human beings who walked this planet, in the days of the dinosaur.  There are footprints in granite, each one 6 foot long by 3 ' wide, footprints of mature human beings, sir, which date back thousands of years, millions of years.  Where did these giants go to?  Who knows; the dinosaurs may have produced an intelligent race, a race which deceives us into thinking that it comes from the stars, when in fact it is part of this planet on which we live. 
There is hope, and the hope is very bright.  A Christ-child is being born in all of us, but like all deaths, the death of the Light-child (the death of the old-self prior to transformation into 'Christness') is going to be attended by great danger, as the enemy is going to be driven into desperation.  The enemy will make mistakes and we will conquer him in God's sacred name.  That is what I believe, sir, and that is what I'm going to hold-on believing until my last breath.
Martin:  And that is a perfect place to end this-on that thought, on that note. 
Now, let me just say, just for you, since 1974, I have seen many, many spaceships, close-up (though not inside nor by abduction).  I have experienced-in the mountains of southern Oregon-I have come across Bigfoot footprints...
Credo Mutwa:  Ah-hah!
Martin:  ...by a river where I was camping.  I have heard the Bigfoot in the mountains at night.  I have heard their cries...
Credo Mutwa:  Ya-ya!  You see?
Martin:  ...from one mountain to another.  These are things I have experienced.  I KNOW these things are real! 
Credo Mutwa:  Yes, sir.  Then, I speak to a fellow warrior, and I say, 'We shall overcome', as the American Marines used to sing during the Second World War.
Martin:  Yes, and during the Vietnam War.
Credo Mutwa:  We will overcome, we will overcome, but skeptics must stop laughing, and fools must stop calling these aliens, god.  There is only ONE God, and He or She or It is the One who created us, and not some impostor who came from somewhere else to hide behind us and to drink our children's blood.  Amen, sir.
Martin:  Yes, absolutely right.  Credo, please know that I deeply appreciate what you have done and the courage of just speaking frankly.  It's past time to hold onto these things, and its time to just speak The Truth.  And for those who don't believe or even consider possibilities, well, it's just too bad.  
Credo Mutwa:  Exactly, and also to confront people with the fact that there is no reason to fear anything.  If we go from a perspective of making information available that should be available to every single person on this blooming planet, why the hell are they trying to threaten you to keep quiet?  If it's so ridiculous, let it be.  Stop assassinating and ridiculing and destroying people by churning-up fear.  This is the perspective I come from, and I'm sure David, as well, and obviously you, as well, do too.  I don't have fear anymore.
It's time that we speak out and that we acquire a consciousness-a global, common consciousness-and get this thing to the front.  Thank you, so much, I really appreciate it.
Martin:  Absolutely right.  Thank you.
[Editor's note:  Rick Martin may be reached directly at the email address rickm@tminet.com  or by writing to: Rick Martin c/o The SPECTRUM Newspaper, 9101 West Sahara Ave., PMB 158, Las Vegas, NV  89117


HE DIANA ASSASSINATION
JUNE 2012 UPDATE: Please see the new website: -


Our dossier on the assassination of Princess Diana - whom was professionally and coldly murdered in Paris on the 31st August 1997.
As the evidence was covered up within minutes of the crash, it is difficult in our limited capacity to 'prove' anything definitive.
Our job with this archive is to simply do our best to put this into perspective and perhaps ask the right questions.
We know that Diana was a rebel, someone with an axe to grind against the oligarchs of the New World Order (NWO) establishment.  This, coupled with her ability to take any issue and put it under public scrutiny - such as the landmines situation - we feel was primarily, but not the only motive behind her murder.  For example, just consider what a voice of dissent she would have been against global events that transpired in the years after 1997. The war on terror in the Middle East would be top of her list I am sure.
We hope that with this archive we have put together something sp