http://www.gamingharbor.com/go.do?a=1805&l=4019
Welcome to Gaia | Gaia Onlinehttp://www.gaiaonline.com/
The Official Site of Major League Baseball: Events: 2009 All-Star Game Sprint Final Vote
http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/events/all_star/y2009/fv/ballot.html
Make Money At Home Onlinehttp://www.howimadecash.com/a/
Read Free Manga Online at One Manga. Online manga scans reader.http://www.onemanga.com/
www.world-job-news.com http://www.world-job-news.com/finance/?t202id=89559&t202kw=lppop-1
Mozilla Firefox Start Page//www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...
Inspirational Quote "The beginning of love is to let those we love be perfectly themselves, and not to twist them to fit our own image. Otherwise we love only the reflection of ourselves we find in them.? Thomas Merton"
//www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...
CBS 11 Dallas CBS4 Denver 13 News, WVEC Hampton Roads 11 News Houston
CBS 2 / KCAL 9 Los Angeles
WHAS TV11 Louisville CBS4 Miami WCCO Minneapolis WWL-TV,
Channel 4 New Orleans CBS 2 New York
CBS 3 Philadelphia KTVK 3TV Phoenix KDKA Pittsburgh
KGW NewsChannel 8 Portland, Ore. WRAL.com Raleigh
CBS 13 / CW 31 Sacramento KENS 5 - TV San Antonio Channel 8 San Diego
CBS 5 San Francisco
KING5 Seattle KREM.com Spokane/Coeur d'Alene KMOV
Channel 4 St. Louis FOX 11 Tucson
Hi there.welcome to YahooRealEstate.com.au Yahoo!!!!!!!Click here for the cheapest real estate advertising on the internet
STUNTMAN: Jon Templeton will act as Hugh Jackman's stunt double in the film Australia. Picture: MEGAN RAYLE
Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
USAWeeklyNews.com
http://usaweeklynews.com/Home_Page.html
USADailyNews http://www.usatoday.com/
USNews.com http://www.usnews.com/ USWeekly.com http://www.usweekly.com/
USANews.net http://www.usanews.net/
More Great World News Links
NEWS NBA NHL Tennis Golf NFL Soccer NASCAR WORLD LOCAL FINANCE
//www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...
ABC News Video FOX News Video FOXBusiness Video CNN Video AP Video BBC News Video Reuters Video AFP Video CNET Video
CNBC Video Australia 7 News Video Rocky Mountain News Elections Video CBC.ca Video NPR Audio
Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone Video
Richard Bangs Adventures Video Charlie Rose Video Expanded Books Video Assignment Earth Video CBS 11 Dallas CBS4 Denver 13 News, WVEC Hampton Roads 11 News Houston WHAS TV11 Louisville CBS4 Miami WCCO Minneapolis WWL-TV, CBS 3 Philadelphia KTVK 3TV Phoenix KDKA Pittsburgh CBS 13 / CW 31 Sacramento KENS 5 - TV San Antonio Channel 8 San Diego KING5 Seattle KREM.com Spokane/Coeur d'Alene KMOV STUNTMAN: Jon Templeton will act as Hugh Jackman's stunt double in the film Australia. Picture: MEGAN RAYLE NEWS NBA NHL Tennis Golf NFL Soccer NASCAR WORLD LOCAL FINANCE More Popular Buzz News HottestWebNews http://www.gamingharbor.com/go.do?a=1805&l=4019 The Official Site of Major League Baseball: Events: 2009 All-Star Game Sprint Final Vote http://mlb.mlb.com/mlb/events/all_star/y2009/fv/ballot.html Make Money At Home Onlinehttp://www.howimadecash.com/a/
Read Free Manga Online at One Manga. Online manga scans reader.http://www.onemanga.com/ Mozilla Firefox Start Page//www.google.com/firefox?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:o...
More Popular Buzz News
ROOFTOPCOMEDY.com Video
Guinness World Records Video weather.com Video AccuWeather Video You Witness News User Video
NPR Audio BY CATEGORY Top Stories Politics World Business Sports
Technology Health & Science Arts U.S.
VIEW LOCAL VIDEO KVUE-TV Austin WJZ 13 Baltimore WBZ Boston
WCNC Charlotte CBS 2 Chicago
CBS 2 / KCAL 9 Los Angeles
Channel 4 New Orleans CBS 2 New York
KGW NewsChannel 8 Portland, Ore. WRAL.com Raleigh
CBS 5 San Francisco
Channel 4 St. Louis FOX 11 TucsonVideo by Category
U.S. Business World Entertainment Sports Tech Politics Science
Health Environment Weather Opinion Odd
Video by Topic Campaign '08 Wall Street Iraq Gas Prices Mideast Conflict
Climate Change
More INL News Video !Finance Sports
Hi there!!!!! welcome to YahooRealEstate.co.uk
the cheapest real estate advertising on the Internet http://yahoorealestate.co.uk/
More Great World News Links
ALL THINGS ARIANNA:
COLUMNISTS:
Blog Web Discovery Machine In Time for Summer, Top Travel Sites Jun 30, 2009 Posted by Geoffrey Mack
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
GamingHarbor, Download Games to get 1000’s of Games!
Welcome to Gaia | Gaia Onlinehttp://www.gaiaonline.com/
www.world-job-news.com http://www.world-job-news.com/finance/?t202id=89559&t202kw=lppop-1
Blog Web Discovery Machine In Time for Summer, Top Travel Sites Jun 30, 2009 Posted by Geoffrey Mack
www.INLNews.com Real Informative Entertaining News http://www.inlnews.com/
www.au1.us For hundreds of daily world news links and headlines from every media outlet in the world see http://au1.us/
www.EdinburghFringeFest.com Offical website for Edinburgh Fringe Festival Ltd the largest arts festival in the worldhttp://edinburghfringefest.com
FringeShowsHaveTalent.com Offical website for Fringe Shows Have Talent TV http://www.fringeshowshavetalent.com/
Email answers to: fringeshowshavetalent@gamil.com
International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year com* $9.99 .net* $9.99 .org* $9.99 .us* $9.99 .biz* $9.99 .ws* $9.99 .name* $9.9
International News Limited's Domain Pricing Per Year com* $9.99 .net* $9.99 .org* $9.99 .us* $9.99 .biz* $9.99 .ws* $9.99 .name* $9.9
with free 5 page web hosting and web building software for dumies video picture music up loading and much more
International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year com* $9.99 .net* $9.99 .org* $9.99 .us* $9.99 .biz* $9.99 .ws* $9.99 .name* $9.9
with free 5 page web hosting and web building software for dumies video picture music up loading and much more
Hi!! I'm Mr Wijat! Please get your own corner of the Web today for under $10 for domain name cost with free 5 page hosting
and web building software for dummies like me and
make money from google adsense by placing gooogle adds on your web pages...
then just sit back and relax while the cheques roll in..
I have given up my day job helping a friend run his internet shop ,
and now have more time to do what I love best..
that are not doing the right thing...don't get me wrong, I get on with most of this in authority,,
you can dance with a Wijat, play with a Wijat..but do not stand on a Wijat's toes....
"Provocative, frightening, informative, humorous- Your view and knowledge of the way the legal, police, political, public trustee business circles operate in Western Australia will never be the same.. after reading these volumes...A must real for present and budding legal eagles, police, politicians, litigants in person, anyone interested in and/or studying the law or the legal system, high school students, also anyone wanting to search for the truth and/or just interested in a book that is about a unique situation where one takes on City Hall which has unlimited resources and gives them a run for it's money - with little and very little resources to fight City Hall with. It has been described as a real David V Goliath affair, and also described by Ian Wilson, Western Australian solicitor, as one of the greatest legal debacles he has ever seen in his legal practice. Ian Wilson tried to negotiate an amicable settlement many years ago without success. The Public Trustee and the Western Australian Government felt there were simply too powerful and untouchable to bother with negotiating in a reasonable manner. Now they are among 69 respondents, including judges, magistrate, senior police, senior prosecutors, senior politicians, well known lawyers and barristers, public trustee accountants and managers, court officers etc., being sued in The Australian Federal Court for conspiracy to defraud the Carew-Reid Family, who are asking $100 million in damages.. Volume 2-Edition 3 is about 1,100 pages plus photos........" Australian Weekend News publishers of The Triumph of Truth (Who's Watching The Watchers?)
The Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching The Watchers?) by Stephen Carew-Reid volumes one to nine, original manuscripts of the first 8 volumes stolen by Queensland Police in Australia to try and cover up the information in these volumes
and illegally removed from the Western Australian Batye Resource Library without any court order from pressure from State Government Law Office
http://usaweeklynews.com/TriumphOfTruth_Book.php http://www.usaweekendnews.com/TriumphOfTruthBookStolen.html
Click here to check the strange justice in Australia http://usaweeklynews.com/Mickleberg_Conspiracy.php
I must have upset some in powerful places when I help investigation corruption in the Australian Political, Freemason, Legal, Court, Prosecution, Police, Prison, Public Trustee, media and business world when I helped Stephen Carew-Reid with his nine volumes of The Triumph of Truth (Who's Watching The Watchers?) when the firtst eight volumes were illegally and wrongly removed destroyed from the Western Australian Batre Library after being purchased with public money, without any court action or court order and also the original manuscripts were stolen by Queensland Detectives Gregrory Stormont and Barry Zerner on behalf of the the powerful people in the Australian Political, Freemason, Legal, Court, Prosecution, Police, Prison, Public Trustee, media and business world and Queensland Government ..at the same tried tried to lock up the author Stephen Carew-Reid ina menal institution to stop him speaking out and destroy the creditabity of what was written in his books..then after I sent it my investition reports tot he Queensland Government..25 police were sacked which I thought was a great idea as this will save the Queensland Governmen $1 million a year in paying salaries to corrupt police that are committting more crimes than they are solving... and now the Queensland Government faces a $100 millin wirt for damages..unless they take the oppportnity selttle out of court with a resonable offer before the court action commences.
See You All Soon in My Favourite USA Newspaper
USA WEEKLY NEWS Great world news links, hard hitting news and features
USA Weekly News Easy To Find Hard to Leave
Click here for usaweeklynews.com Informative, Intertesting, Entertaining and Real News http://usaweeklynews.com/Home_Page.php USAWeeklyNews Easy To Find and Hard To Leave
International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year com* $9.99 .net* $9.99 .org* $9.99 .us* $9.99 .biz* $9.99 .ws* $9.99 .name* $9.9
Madeleine McCann must be found!
Please place this statement everywhere you can..all emails, websites posters, blogs, message boards etc
This is what Madeline McCann is likely ot look like now in 2009..
Please help find Maddy the world's favourite girl
Missing Madeleine! Madeleine McCann was abducted from Praia Da Luz, Portugal on 3rd May, 2007anyone with any information and/or ideas how to find Madeline please go to your nearest police station
Click here to view the Video to help find Maddy at http://usaweeklynews.com/Home_Page.php
Please Help to bring this family together again with Maddy back in the family's arms...
If you have any ideas at all how to find Maddy please contact your nearest police station.
Click here ot find out more about Maddy's Disapearance.. the more you know the more you may be able to help find Maddy
USA Weekly News Easy To Find Hard to Leave
Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
USAWeeklyNews.com
http://usaweeklynews.com/Home_Page.php
USADailyNews http://www.usatoday.com/
USNews.com http://www.usnews.com/ USWeekly.com http://www.usweekly.com/
USANews.net http://www.usanews.net/
More Great World News Links
International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year
.com* $9.99 | .net* $9.99 | .org* $9.99 | .info* $9.99 | .us* $9.99 | .biz* $9.99 | .ws* $9.75 | .name* $7.95
Save even more on multi-year registrations!
Visit International News Limited for the best values on: domain names, domain transfers and more!
Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
INLNews YahooMail HotMail GMail AOLMailUSA MAILYahooMail HotMailGMail AOLMail MyWayMail CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNsNYTimes WashNs AustStockEx
WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs
TasNews ABCTas DarwinNsUSA MAIL
Click here for email login for YahooRealEstate.com.au
all from $9.99CBS 11 Dallas CBS4 Denver 13 News, WVEC Hampton Roads 11 News Houston CBS 2 / KCAL 9 Los Angeles
WHAS TV11 Louisville CBS4 Miami WCCO Minneapolis WWL-TV, Channel 4 New Orleans CBS 2 New York
CBS 3 Philadelphia KTVK 3TV Phoenix KDKA Pittsburgh KGW NewsChannel 8 Portland, Ore. WRAL.com Raleigh
CBS 13 / CW 31 Sacramento KENS 5 - TV San Antonio Channel 8 San Diego CBS 5 San Francisco
KING5 Seattle KREM.com Spokane/Coeur d'Alene KMOV Channel 4 St. Louis FOX 11 Tucson
Hi There...Welcome to Yahoo Real Estate Click here for the cheapest real estate advertising on the internet http://yahoorealestate.co.uk/
STUNTMAN: Jon Templeton will act as Hugh Jackman's stunt double in the film Australia. Picture: MEGAN BRAYLE
YahooMail HotMailGMail AOLMail MyWayMail CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNs NYTimes WashNs
AustStockEx WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNs ABCAust WANs NZNews QldNs
PROJECT BLUE BEAM Project Blue Beam will work on a hybrid of media and the holographs and such use Hollywood SFX. The central hub of Blue Beam is Hollywood, CA. One of the top guys in Project Blue Beam is Rupert Murdoch who owns News Corps. He is one of the highest ranking Illuminati guys there is and outranks the top Rothschild or Rockefeller or Bush members. President Obama is also involved in Blue Beam and his election was engineered by The Illuminati. |
The point of Blue Beam is twofold: to create a new world religion, and to place power in the hands of giant multi-national corporations, of which there will be two major ones. The World Government will be secondary in power to both the World Bank and the Giant Omni-Corps like Corporation that will form. The political leaders of tomorrow will only be stooges to this corporation.
|
Blue Beam will involve many aspects including the fulfillment of the Book of Revelation, aliens, and even reported time travelers. Most of it will be faked.
|
MAIN THING PEOPLE HAVE WRONG ABOUT BLUE BEAM:
Project Blue Beam is not designed to 'trick people' into thinking it is real like some people think. Instead, it turns the whole world into Entertainment and the idea is just to 'market' the new world religion like you were marketing Star Wars. They are planning to just make it an entertainment thing that people buy or watch for fun like they would The Simpsons or Star Wars or The Matrix, but it will use real people as Divine Figures. |
Nobody is going to know how to fight it because it uses entertainment and comedy and a lot of the times it is designed to make fools out of anyone who protests against it by turning the joke on them.
|
Some of the top key pawns in the plan will be playing outrageous characters like Borat, Sacha Baron Cohen's character, and nobody really knows how to fight against something like Borat.
|
ENGINEERING OF SECOND COMING OF CHRIST:
The Second Coming of Christ is supposed to be engineered for 2012. It is a baby that will be born. They have already selected the mother for this child. They will pass it off that the mother is from the bloodline of the original Jesus Christ, what some call the Merovingian Bloodline, and promote the birth as the fulfillment of Divine Prophecy. Their goal is to get people to see this child as the Messiah when he is just a baby. The mother is from a rich and wealthy and powerful family. She does not know what is being planned. |
THE HEAD OF THE ILLUMINATI I know who the head of The Illuminati is. He is very young and is only like 26 or 27. He is also Jewish. Rupert Murdoch works under him, even though Murdoch is much older than him, and he is using News Corp as part of his plan. He is reportedly like a boy genius or something. He is from New Jersey and went to Harvard.
|
I will not say his name. He is not that famous so you might no have ever heard his name. However you can Google him and there is info on him on the internet.
|
He is the guy who is going to try to be the father of the child as well and his plan is to pass his son off as The Messiah. The mother is much more famous than him because her family is a very well known family
|
Re: Mind Control, Freemasonry and Illuminati Texts: FAMOUS FREEMASONS | Quote | ||||||||||||
US-PRESIDENTS: George Washington, James Monroe, Andrew Jackson, James Polk, James Buchanan, Andrew Johnson, James Garfield, William McKinley, Theodore Roosevelt, William Howard Taft, Warren G. Harding, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Harry S. Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson, Gerald R. Ford. POLITICAL LEADERS WORLD WIDE: Winston Churchill, Simon Bolivar, Edmund Burke, Benito Juarez, Edward VII, Geroge VI, Bernardo O'Higgins, José de San Martin, Francisco de Paula Santander, José Rizal, José Marti, Pandit Nehru, Lajos Kossuth, Jonas Furrer, Guiseppe Mazzini, Eduard Benes, John A. MacDonald, Aaron Burr, George McGovern, Barry Goldwater, Estes Kefauer, Thomas E. Dewey, Alf Landon, Hubert H. Humphrey, Wendel Wilke, W.E.B. DuBois, William Jennings Bryant, King Hussein of Jordan, Yasser Arafat, Francois Mitterand, Helmut Kohl, Gerhard Shroeder, Tony Blair, Yikzak Rabbin, Cecil Rhodes, Sir John J.C. Abbott, Stephen F. Austin, John G. Diefenbaker, Samuel J. Ervin Jr. (Watergate committee), Benjamin Franklin, John Hancock, Patrick Henry, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Sam Nunn, Lowell Thomas (brough Lawrence of Arabia to pub. not.), Gov. George C. Wallace, Strom Thurman, Jesse Helms, Robert Dole, Jack Kemp, Al Gore, Prince Phillip (GB), Zbigniew Brzezinski, Lord Peter Carrington, Andrew Carnegie, W. Averell Harriman, Henry Kissinger, Richard D. Heideman, Robert McNamara. MILITARY LEADERS: Omar Bradley, John J. Pershing, Douglas McArthur, General Winfield Scott, Captain Eddie Rickenbacker, Jimmy Doolittle, General Mark Clarkem General George C. Marshall, General Henry "Hap" Arnold, John Paul Jones, Afred von Tirpitz (submarine warfare) ARTISTS AND ENTERTAINERS: W.A. Mozart, Leopold Mozart, Ludwig van Beethoven, Jean Sibelius, Franz Liszt, Josef Haydn, Irving Berlin, Gutzon Borglum, Charles Peale, Alfons M. Mucha, Richard Wagner, John Philip Sousa, Gilbert & Sullivan, George Gershwin, George M. Cohen, Count Basie, Louise Armstrong, Nat King Cole, Giacomo Meyerbeer, Sigmund Romberg, John Wayne, Red Skelton, Clarke Gable, W.C. Fields, Will Rogers, Burl Ives, Roy Rogers, Danny Thomas, Ernest Borgnine, Oliver Hardy, Tom Mix, Audie Murphy, Gene Autry, Wallace Beery, Eddie Cantor, Roy Clarke, George M. Cohan, Walt Disney, Duke Ellington, Douglas Fairbanks, Leonardo da Vinci, Arthur Godfrey, Bob Hope, Harry Houdini, Al Jolson, Elmo Lincoln (Tarzan), Harold C. Lloyd,.jr, Tom Mix, Ronald Reagan, Will Rogers, Peter Sellers, William Shakespeare, Charles "Tom Thumb" Stratton, Paul Whiteman (King of Jazz), William Wyler (dir. of Ben Hur), Cecil B. DeMille, Sir Arthur Sullivan, John Zoffany. MOVIE INDUSTRY: Jack Warner, Louise B. Mayer (MGM), Darryl F. Zanuck (20th Century Fox) INDUSTRY, TRADE, BANKING AND LABOR: Henry Ford, Samuel Gompers, Walter P. Chrysler, John Wanamaker, S.S. Kresge, J.C. Penney, John Jacob Astor, John L. Lewis, Pehr G. Gyllenhammar (Volvo), Percy Barnevik (ABB), André Citroën, Samuel Colt (Colt revolver), Edwin L. Drake (oil), Rockefeller family, Rothschild family, King C. Gillette (Razors), Charles C. Hilton (Hilton hotels), Sir Thomas Lipton (Tea), Harry S. New (Airmail), Ransom E. Olds (Oldsmobile), David Sarnoff (father of TV), John W. Teets, Dave Thomas (Wendy's Rest.), Edgar Bronfman Jr. (Seagram Whiskey), Rich DeVos (Amway), Alan Greenspan (Fed. Reserve), Giovanni Agnelli (FIAT), Peter Wallenberg (SE-Bank Sweden) ADVENTURERS: Lewis & Clarke, Charles A. Lindbergh, Kit Carson, Roald Amundsen, Admiral Richard Byrd, Commodore Robert Peary, Kit Carson, Casanova, William "Buffalo Bill" Cody, Davy Crockett, Meriwether Lewis, Robert E. Peary (Northpole) PHILOSOPHERS: Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Gotthold E. Lessing, Voltaire ASTRONAUTS: Buzz Aldrin, Leroy Gordon Cooper, Donn Eisele, Virgil I. Grissom, Edgar D. Mitchell, Walter Schirra Jr., Thomas P. Stafford, Paul Weitz, James Irvin, John Glenn WRITERS: Mark Twain, Sir Walter Scott, Rudyard Kipling, Robert Burns, Wassily I. Maikow, Heinrich Heine, Jean P.C. de Florian, Leopoldo Lugoner, Antonio de Castro Alves, James Boswell, Alexander Pushkin, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Jonathan Swift, Oscar Wilde, Jules Verne, H.G. Wells, Robert Burns, Carlo Collodi (Pinoccio), Edward Gibbon, Francis Scott Key (US NAtional Anthem), Rudyard Kipling, Felix Salten (Bambi), Lewis Wallace (Ben Hur), Alexander Pope MEDICINE: Alexander Fleming (Penicillin), Jules Bordet, Antoine DePage, Edward Jenner, Charles & William Mayo, Karl & William Menninger, Karl A. Menninger (psychiatrist), Andrew T. Still (Osteopathy) SCIENCE: Carl Sagan, Hans C. Orsted, J.J Frk. von Berzelius, Alfred Edmund Brehms, Luther Burbank, Johan Ernst Gunnerus, Albert Abraham Michelson (measured speed of light), Gaspard Monge, C.F.S. Hahnemann, Pedro N. Arata, Alexandre Gustave Eiffel, Jame Smithson, John Fitch (Steamboats), Joseph Ignance Guillotin (inventor of the Guillotin), Edward Jenner (vaccin), Simon Lake (submarine), Franz Anton Mesmer (Hypnotism), Albert Einstein, A.J. Sax (saxophone) LAW: Henry Baldwin, Hugo L. Black, John Blair Jr., Samuel Blatchford, Harold H. Burton, James F. Byrnes, John Catton, Thomas C. Clarke, John H. Clarke, William Cushing, Willis van Devanter, William O. Douglas, Oliver Ellsworth, Stephen J. Field, John M. Harlan, RObert H. Jackson, Joseph E. Lamar, Thurgood Marshall, Stanley Matthews, Sherman Minton, Tom Mix, William H. Moody, Samuel Nelson, William Paterson, Mahlon Pitney, Stanley F. Reed, Wiley B. Rutledge, Potter Stewart, Noah H. Swayne, Thomas Todd, Robert Trimble, Frederick M. Vinson, Earl Warren, Levi Woodbury, William B. Woods OTHERS: Frederic A. Bartholdi (designed the Staue of Liberty), Daniel Carter Beard (founder of Boy Scouts), Cornelius Hedges (Yellowstone Nat.Park), James Hoban (architect U.S Captial), James Naismith (basketball), Paul Revere (famous American), Rupert Murdoch (media mogul) EDUCATION: Robert E.B. Baylor, Leland Stanford (Railroads & Stanford University) RELIGIOUS LEADERS: Father Francisco Calvo (Jesuit Cat. Priest), Geoffrey Fisher (Canterbury), Billy Graham, Rev. Jesse Jackson, Joseph Fort Newton, Robert Shuller, Oral Roberts, Louise Farrahkan (Nation of Islam), G. Bromley Oxman (friend of Billy Graham), Joseph Smith (Mormon cult), Hyrum Smith (Brother), Brigham Young (2nd leader of Mormon cult), Sidney Rigdon (early Mormon), Heber C. Kimball, Spencer Kimball, Aleister Crowley (Satanist), Gerald B. Gardner (Wiccan), Wynn Westcott (Golden Dawn) ORGANIZATIONS: Jean Henry Dunant (Red Cross), Melvin Jones (Lions Int.), Giuseppe Mazzini (Ital. Illuminati leader), Albert Pike (Ku Klux Klan) INTELLIGENCE: J. Edgar Hoover, William Casey [link to www.illuminati-news.com] Official 2012 Countdown: Welcome to the World's Biggest Party!!! [link to www.maya12-21-2012.com] in5D: [link to www.in5d.com] New YouTube Channel: [link to www.youtube.com] 2012 The Online Movie: [link to www.youtube.com
|
Re: Mind Control, Freemasonry and Illuminati Texts: FAMOUS FREEMASONS | Quote |
Deeper Insights into the Illuminati Formula small exceprt full version is available online at: [link to educate-yourself.org] IF THERE IS ANY CHANCE you the reader have had mind-control done to you, you must consider the following book to be DANGEROUS. If you are consulting a therapist for DID (also known as MPD), it is recommended that you consult your therapist before reading this book. The complications that could result for those under mind control learning the truth--could be fatal. The co-authors take no responsibility for those who read or misuse this information. The reader’s mind is like a garden. It may not be time to plant the truth in your mind. Perhaps you need some weeding or ground preparation, before the garden of your mind is ready. Perhaps the weather is too stormy to plant the truth. Pray to the Lord of the Harvest. The blessings that flow from planting the information of this book in your mind, will require the presence of living waters of love. If you do not have love in your heart, this book is not for you. The information contained in this book is the biggest news-story of the 20th century, and still the biggest secret. It will challenge you, shock you, horrify you and hopefully motivate you to redouble your efforts to humble yourself and seek strength from God Almighty. INTRODUCTION by Fritz There are many dangers to the human race, some real and some imagined. I believe that the trauma-based mind control which this book exposes is the greatest danger to the human race. It gives evil men the power to carry out any evil deed totally undetected. By the time the astute reader finishes this book, they will be as familiar with how to carry out trauma-based mind-control as some of the programmers. Ancient and more recent secrets will no longer be secrets. Over the years, I have spent thousands of hours studying the Illuminati, the Intelligence agencies of the world, and the occult world in general. The centerpiece of these organizations is the trauma-based mind control that they carry out. Without the ability to carry out this sophisticated type of mind-control using MPD, drugs, hypnosis and electronics and other control methodologies, these organizations would fail to keep their dark evil deeds secret. When one of the mind-control programmers of the Church of Scientology, who has left Scientology, was asked about MPD, he said, "It’s the name of the game of mind control." Research into this subject will never be complete. This book has tried to give a comprehensive view of how the programming is done. The basic techniques were developed in German, Scottish, Italian, and English Illuminati families and have been done for centuries. Some report that some of the techniques go back to ancient Egypt and ancient Babylon to the ancient mystery religions. The Nazis are known to have studied ancient Egyptian texts in their mind control research. The records and secrets of the generational Illuminati bloodlines are very-well guarded secrets. Even when I’ve learned about the location of secret depositories of some of the Illuminati’s secrets in Europe, America, and Asia, their records and secrets are too well-guarded to be examined. The intelligence agencies, such as MI-6 began investigating these mind-control techniques early this century, but their records have been routinely destroyed and tampered with. There are some survivors and professionals who know that the British used programmed trauma-based MPD (DID) agents in W.W. I. In Jan., 1987, Richard Kluft submitted an article to the American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis about 8 MPD patients who were between 60 and 72 years of age. Traugott Konstantin Oesterreich (1880-1949), who was professor of philosophy at Tubingen University, Germany studied MPD and demonic possession and wrote a classic study of it in 1921 entitled Possession Demonical & Other, which was translated into english in 1930. His classic work on this subject provides documented cases which reveal that the basic trauma-based mind-control was going on in Germany, France & Belgium long before the 20th century. Although he is unable to put together all the pieces and the clues for what they are, the reader of this book might enjoy reading the 1930 English translation of his classic work after they finish this book. Oesterreich’s research in early 1900s was the type of research that the Nazi mind-control programmers were very aware of. In 1921, the Germans such as Oesterreich would describe personality switches, by the term "somnambuliform [hypnotic states] possession" or "demonical somnambulism" or what might be called "Besessenheit von Hypnotismus und bösen Geistern." The ability to study both the spiritual & psychological aspects of mind-control phenomena, is often lacking today. There are exceptions such as Dr. Loreda Fox’s book The Spiritual Dimensions of MPD. In the 1920s, the Germans also were aware that the human mind has a variety of ego-psycho-psysiological states rather than one unified mind, which they termed "Sub jecklose Psychologie" or the psychology of having correlated psychological states rather than the concept of a single ego. The Germans and Italians under the Nazi and Fascist governments began to do serious scientific research into trauma-based mind control. Under the auspices of the Kaiser Wilhelm Medical Institute in Berlin, Joseph Mengele conducted mind-control research on thousands of twins, and thousands of other hapless victims. Himmler supervised genetic research. The Nazi research records were confiscated by the Allies and are still classified. A trip can be made from downtown Washington D.C. on a gray-government van which serves as a shuttle to the Suitland Annex where the government’s secrets are buried including research papers captured from the Nazi Mind-Control research. Most of Mengele’s concentration camp research is still classified. Much of it dealt with mind control. A researcher can visit the top floor, but underground below the top floor are the real secrets. The real secrets are lying in millions of sheets of classified documents hidden behind blast proof doors. There they have vault after vault, and row after row of top-secret files that only a few privileged persons with security clearances above COSMIC--such as with a "C3" or "MJ" security clearance can visit. Everyone with these high security clearances which I have identified is connected to the Illuminati. Each underground area at Suitland Annex has its own subset of secret access words, known only to the initiated. Most of the OSS records have been destroyed, a few have been left, the important ones have been misfiled or remade. (This is according to a reliable British intelligent agent.) Also according to reliable inside sources the CIA is working night and day to remake old records, to expunge all the real dirty secrets from their records. The basement of CIA HQ is known as "the Pit," In the Pit documents are being shredded and burned on a round the clock basis. The large remains of these secrets are sold for landfill. The Illuminati have developed secrecy to a fine art. They train their people in the art of secrecy from the time they are born. Most everything they do, is done orally. They are trained not to write rituals and other things down. There is very little paper trail left by the Illuminati. The creation of slaves with photographic memories facilitates this secrecy. But this book is not about how they have managed to keep their trauma-based Monarch Mind-Control a secret. They have managed only to keep it a secret to the general public. They have not been able to completely cover-up the millions of wasted lives that their programming has ruined. For many years, they were able to shut-up and quietly discard their programmed multiples by labelling them Paranoid Schizophrenics. But therapists are now correctly identifying these people as programmed multiples and are not only diagnosing them better but giving them better treatment. After Candy Jones’s husband deprogrammed her enough that she could participate in writing a book exposing some of what had been done to her, the secret was out. (See The Control of Candy Jones Hypnotism and the CIA by Donald Bain.) Ever since then, the intelligence agencies and the Illuminati have been carrying out damage control. Their biggest damage control campaign has enlisted the power of Hollywood and the controlled Media. This campaign is known as the False Memory Syndrome campaign, or as those of us who know the facts like to call it ""the false memory spin-drome." The headquarters of the False Memory Spin-drom Foundation is located at 3401 Market St., Suite 130, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Some of the original founders were doctors of the University of Pennslyvannia. The inside story about these early FMS doctors of the University of Pennslyvannia is that they practiced Satanic Rituals during their work days. What is unusual about this--is that generally satanic rituals are performed at night, but these doctors did their coven work during the day. I know about these men. Now you can see why these men started the FMS! They started it to cover their own sins, because many of them were abusers themselves. In other words many of the EMS people are abusers of trauma-based mind-controlled slaves, or the victims of abuse who are in denial about their own abuse from trauma-based mind-control. Martin T. Orn (the person credited with founding the FMS) had ties to the CIA. Two members of the EMS advisory board, Ralph Underwager, Ph.D. and theologian, along with Hollida Wakefield, M.A. let the cat out of the bag when they publicly supported pedophilia (that is adults having sex with children). Their support of pedophilia came in an interview with a Dutch magazine Paidika, The Journal of Paedophilia (Winter, 1993). Although the False Memory Syndrome Foundation gets upset at any mention that there might be a conspiracy by the perpetrators of mind-control, because conspiracies supposedly don’t and can’t happen, they want us to believe that all therapists are conspiring together to implant false memories of abuse into their clients, which could not be further from the truth. Monarch slaves typically run into a great deal of denial by their therapists that anything like this could be happening. The bottom line is that Multiple Personality Disorder (now refered to as Dissociative Identity Disorder) is a recognized bona fide diagnosis. False Memory Syndrome is not a recognized medical or psychological diagnosis and does not appear in the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual III-R nor the recently released DSM-IV. Those who followed Fritz’s writings have learned about the close working relationship between the Mondavi’s and the Rothschilds (see his article about the Mondavi/Rothschild Napa Valley winery). Guess who got the court precedence which gives the EMS some legal ground to attack therapists? The precidence was supposedly a wife who went to a doctor who told her she had syphilis. The wife assumes she got it from her husband and divorces him. Then she learns she doesn’t have syphilis. The husband then sues the doctor. Upon this bizarre case rests the legal precedence for a third party to sue a person who gives advice, such as family members suing a therapist. Upon this weak precidence, an abusive father who worked for Monday in a winery in California successfully destroyed a legitimate therapist who was trying to save his daughter who was a programmed Monarch victim. Supposedly the therapist had implanted false memories of rape in his daughter, when the record shows that the daughter’s mother told the therapist the girl had been raped by the father. When a valid case of SRA and repressed memories went to trial in Washington state involving a police officer whose family was MPD, Dr. Richard Ofshe of the False Memory Spindrom showed up to cause mischief. And mischief he did work. The case involved the children of a ""Christian"" police officer named Ingram who had satanically ritually abused his family for years. The daughter won in court, but Ofshe of the EMS was not above writing a book full of lies and distortions about the case. Lynn Crook, who was the abused daughter in the case wrote up a paper exposing what EMS person Richard Ofshe did to her, The controlled media is giving full license and great coverage to the EMS people. Rather than fighting the government for scraps of declassified documents which have had their secrets marked out, and which may even be fake documents manufactured by the CIA, I have decided that there is a much better approach to expose the Monarch Mind Control to the world. If a person could never go to Nepal, he can see pictures of it and believe it exists. If a person can not get into the top secret records of the CIA and Office of Naval Intelligence and MI6, they can be given the exact RECIPE for creating a Monarch slave. I believe that by giving the step by step recipe, people will see that A. all the ingredients are available, B. it is possible to combine the ingredients, C. all it takes is the motive to do it, and that motive is self-evident. We’ll even provide some of the names and places as we go along. This book will provide the step-by-step recipe for making a Monarch Mind-Controlled slave, It is a trauma-based mind control which programs multiple personalities using every known technique of mind-control. Every type of mind-control technique has been combined into a group package which makes the total package almost impossible to break. It is this ability to synthesize all these methods into a group package which is so powerful. Edward Hunter, author of Brainwashing In Red China, testified in 1958 before a U.S. Congressional House Committee on Un-American Activities: "Since man began, he has tried to influence other men or women to his way of thinking. There have always been these forms of pressure to change attitudes. We discovered in the past thirty years, a technique to influence, by clinical, hospital procedures, the thinking processes of human beings. Brainwashing is formed out of a set of different elements ... hunger, fatigue, tenseness, threats, violence, and in more intense cases...drugs and hypnotism. No one of these elements alone can be regarded as brain washing, any more than an apple can be called apple pie. Other ingredients have to be added, and a cooking process gone through. So it is with brainwashing..." Hunter said brainwashing was a Red Chinese threat. He said that the chinese were the ones using these tactics. In reality, this mind control was being done in the U.S. and Hunter was a pawn to help justify the criminal activities of the programmers should they ever be found out behind their cover of "National security." The handlers of mind-controlled slaves carry around a black or grey 3 ring notebook or a lap top computer with the access codes and triggers. Some of the programmers and handlers have this all memorized. The deepest parts, core/gems/executive committee, false trinity etc. are charted in esoteric language such as Enochian, Hebrew (which is considered magical), and Druid symbols. I have never gotten the opportunity to look at one of these, although a number of the slaves who I’ve talked with have while they were being programmed. These notebooks have color-coded graphs showing the arrangement of alters, the structure of the system, the training of the alters, the history of the alters and other details. All the primary tortures carried out on a slave are coded using dates/no.s so that the memories can be pulled up by the programmers. There is a standard set of hand signals, gestures, and codes that allow a handler to work with someone else’s slave, but the accepted code among the handlers is to leave another man’s slave alone. As one leading psychiatrist put it, "Different ideologies use the same methodologies of mind control." The Illuminati have secretly put in base programming that allows them ultimate control over many of the other groups’ slaves. This will be described within this book. For both the ease of reading and the ease of writing, I have dispensed with most footnotes. To provide my sources would double the size of the book, and many of them are confidential. (In the past, when I have attempted crediting information, some people have gotten bruised feelings for having been passed over or for being named. When information comes in from several sources, it becomes difficult to pass out credit.) I have made conservative judgement calls about what material I could use. Most of this information has been verified by several reliable sources. Confidential eyewitnesses are often the only source, when there is such a powerful conspiracy to keep this vast NWO mind control secret. Paper trails were not left or are not available. Programmed slaves who have worked for the military as mind-controlled slaves have witnessed their files expunged and sanitized. The New World Order in 1981 made training films for their novice programmers. Monarch slave Cathy O’Brien was used to make both the film "How to Divide a Personality" and "How To Create a Sex Slave." Two Huntsville porn photographers were used to help NASA and the NWO create these training films. Undoubtedly, other porn training films exist too. In others words, there is film evidence of the Monarch Total Mind-control but these porn films are kept in very secure sites. During the last few years, I have visited with ex-programmers, I have visited with hundreds of victims of the Monarch type programming. I have gone to programming sites, I have visited with therapists who work with the victims of this mind-control, and I have met several of the programmers of the CIA/Illuminati face to face in the adventures of trying to save people from their programming. I hope that God gives me the strength and the opportunity to get the information I have learned out to the world in general. When this information gets out, hopefully it will help lift some of the secrecy of the Monarch Programming. The Monarch Programming is a foundation rock of the New World Order that when pulled up, will reveal the most evil two-legged bugs and slimy critters. When their rock is lifted, they will have to scurry to hide. Because the authors know what the programmers do, they must honestly record several areas of programming that will be controversial. The programmers are very much into demonology. Before therapists close their minds to this subject, the authors would like to point out, that they personally know of cases where Monarch slaves whose Christian personalities & other alters didn’t believe in demonology were talked into participating in real deliverance, and the slaves discovered much to their surprise that work they had unsuccessfully tried to do for years with their therapist was accomplished in a day or two. Some prestigious researchers have decided the subconscious doesn’t exist because they can’t find it--its mysterious. To the man in the street the concept "subconscious" is as mysterious as the concept "demon". Both have been the objects of intense research by U.S./Brit./Ger. Intelligence groups. In fact, many of the concepts in this book have been purposely obscurred by the Illuminati’s control over the media and universities. These obscurred concepts include M.P.D. (DID), recovered memories, hypnosis, demonic possession, aliens, mind-control, the subconscious, a conspiracy to bring in a NWO, truth, etc. The smokescreens of controversy will continue; but those who love the truth, if they seek it, will realize the importance of this book. It’s on public record that MK ULTRA, the mind control research which CIA director Admiral Stansfield Turner admitted to in 1977 spent millions of dollars studing Voodoo, witchcraft, and psychics. On August 3, 1977, at a Senate hearing the then CIA director Admiral Stansfield Turner disclosed that the CIA had been conducting mind control on countless numbers of unsuspecting victims for years, without their knowledge or consent. These CIA mind-control operations were carried out with the participation of a least 185 scientists and at least 80 American institutions, including prisons, pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, and 44 medical colleges & universities. Many of America’s most prestigious institutes of medical research, had cooperated with the CIA. as well as numerous big name corporations. Casey admitted that day that the CIA did mind-control consisting of drugs, hypnosis & electro-shock. A few of the victims of the Monarch Project were even awarded financial compensation for their misery. But what was admitted was admitted in the spirit of covering up the extent of the full truth. The compensation was actually hush money, because victims were given "gag orders" by judges not to talk about what had happened to them. It’s been a disaster for Monarch victims that so many ministers have ignored those words of their Scripture, "For we are not ignorant of the devil’s devices." 2 COR 2:11 This book is a must for those ministers who seriously believe "Having therefore these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God." 2 COR 7:1. In 2 TIM 2: 19-21, believers who "nameth the name of Christ" are asked to purge themselves of their uncleanliness ( unclean spirits). There are many top notch Christians in the churches today who are under mind-control, incl. many of the Christian leadership. I would like to remind Christian ministers that Isaiah the great prophet said, "The Lord GOD hath given me the tongue of the learned that I should know how to speak a word in season to him that is weary: he wakeneth morning by morning; he wakeneth mine ear to hear as the learned." Ignorance is not godliness. Isaiah learned to speak with the great learned men of his day, just as Paul the great apostle could speak to the learned men of his time. One of the character traits of God is that He is all-knowing. WHO says it is godly to be ignorant? The prophet Daniel said Yahweh God "reveals the deep and secret things." (Dan. 2:22a) God’s instruments will do this revealing. Jesus’ advice to his disciples was in effect to "Be wise as serpents, and gentle as a lamb". This advice certainly applies in helping the victims of trauma-based mind-control. Paul in his letter to the Thessalonians (1 Thes 5:14) says that in effect that different people need different counseling, but they all need to be treated with patience. The first step in suggesting a cure is to find out what happened. That is what this book is about. This book is about how the Occult Network creates the problem that therapists and a few ministers try to deal with. But the keys to open doors to healthy solutions for the victims of trauma-based total mind control will reveal themselves in this book for the reader as this book reveals the nitty-gritty of how the total mind-control happens. Christ came to free the captives (Isaiah 61:1). Satanic ritual abuse has a history that is almost as old as history itself. Good King Hezekiah was a victim as a child of SRA. (2 Chr. 29) who got free. Moses confronted the satanic magic of Pharoah’s magicians who could create live snakes from sticks. The Apostle Paul had to deal with Simon Magus, a leader of what is now known as Satanism. Solomon, one of the greatest men of faith, backslide and became one of the greatest satanists of all history. We have "no fellowship with unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them" (as per EPH 5:11). While we have no fellowship with evil, the mind-control programmers are counting on us being so ignorant of their devices that they can hide their control devices behind perversion & filth that many people shy away from. We must be strong enough to face evil and not shy away from it. The victims of mind-control must look evil in the face & not look away to gain their freedom. We, who want to help them, must be courageous & strong enough to do this too. This book is written for that divine goal "till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ." Eph. 4:13 If the body of Christ is to attain fullness, we need this book to weed out the hidden terrible cancer that is consuming the body from within. This book is written for ministers, secular and Christian therapists, and truth lovers of all kinds. If you love the truth this book is for you. If you see something good in the human race so that our species should be preserved as well as the spotted owl and the sand flea, then this book is for you. IF YOU LOVE THE TRUTH, this BOOK is for YOU. Official 2012 Countdown: Welcome to the World's Biggest Party!!! [link to www.maya12-21-2012.com] in5D: [link to www.in5d.com] New YouTube Channel: [link to www.youtube.com |
Barely a day passes in which a story doesn't emerge about Rupert Murdoch'sdetermination to charge for content. If he isn't speaking about it himself, his senior executives are doing so
Richard Branson, founder of the Virgin Group, has attacked Rupert Murdoch's dominance, through BSkyB, of the UK's pay television market
News Corp boss says US television site Hulu could stage an abrupt turnaround and begin charging viewers to watch online
John McQuaid: Instead of defending Fox News as one of their own, the US media should join the White House's war against the network
Media companies may be suffering from recessionary woes, but there is no shortage of bidders for the Travel Channel, the satellite and cable network
Far-right party leader claims Question Time appearance will be 'a stage-managed farce'
A survey among 2,000 Britons found that paid content has not much of a chance in the UK
There are, naturally enough, all sorts of rumours about Rupert Murdoc
h's exact plans for erecting paywalls on his Wapping newspaper websites
Rupert Murdoch is clearly determined to ensure that nothing produced by his media group is going to be free. He said that News Corporation would be seeking fees from American cable and satellite operators to carry his Fox TV network
16 Oct 2009:
Though I am late in pointing to these pieces they deserve as wide an audience as possible within the media world
Michael Tomasky: Fox News is clearly an arm of the Republican party. Obama is right to throw caution to the wind and treat it as such
Seen from the outside the saga of the London newspaper war over the past couple of years looks decidedly odd. That's reflected well in an excellent piece by Philip Stone
Rupert Murdoch's daily business newspaper, the Wall Street Journal, is expected to be named as the largest US paper by weekday circulation when the latest ABC figures are released in a couple of weeks time
Rupert Murdoch is determined to make search engines pay for content. Along with Associated Press chief Tom Curley, he called for online outlets using editorial material to pay for it
Has Rupert Murdoch lost the plot? As absurd as it may to suggest that one of the world's most successful media moguls may be in any kind of danger I argue in my London Evening Standardcolumn today that his News Corporation business is facing a genuine crisis
Has Rupert Murdoch lost the plot? As absurd as it may to suggest that one of the world's most successful media moguls may be in any kind of danger I argue in my London Evening Standardcolumn today that his News Corporation business is facing a genuine crisis
Plan to offer special benefits for a £50 annual fee marks shift from growing audience to making money from regular readers. By Chris Tryhorn
Financial Times, Radio Times and Spectator join the race to make money out of 'apps'. By Richard Wray
What can David Cameron do for Rupert Murdoch in return for the media mogul granting him support by The Sun?
Jonathan Freedland: Conference season 09: Politicians should expect press scrutiny and tough questions. But this sledging of Gordon Brown is ugly and undemocratic
Brighton conference reacts with standing ovation as Tony Woodley rips up newspaper headlined 'Labour's lost it'
Harriet Harman launches angry attack on Rupert Murdoch's tabloid for declaring support for David Cameron
With brutish timing, the sleepy old rottweiler of Wapping gnashes its yellow teeth
PaidContent: Rupert Murdoch claims that readers are 'happily' willing to pay, if publishers get the system right
Watch this Fox News clip. A Florida law professor, Jeremy Levitt, argues with the right-wing presenter Bill O'Reilly over a claim that the channel has fomented racial tensions in its reports onPresident Obama
The market research revelation that only 5% of UK web users would pay for online news doesn't surprise me in the least. But I doubt that it will stopRupert Murdoch in his tracks
Read Media Monkey's diary from the Monday section
Media Monkey's Diary
?The biter, it seems, has been bit. It is only a few short weeks since the BBC came under fire for scheduling Strictly Come Dancing against ITV1's The X Factor, only for the celebrity dance show to take a drubbing in the ratings. Now Top Gear is back on BBC2 but – what's this? – an hour later than its normal 8pm start time on a Sunday night, to avoid a clash with the ratings behemoth that is ... The X Factor. "We had no choice really," said Top Gear producer Andy Wilman. "X Factor on at the same time with the results show, Cowell on storming form, the whole nation glued – we know when to bravely bugger off and wait until the storm passes." If only they had thought of that with Strictly Come Dancing.
?BBC trustee David Liddiment may as well tear up his review of Radio 2 and go home, after the station's star DJ, Chris Evans, had the last word on complaints from commercial radio that the station was targeting too young an audience. Evans, who will take over the breakfast slot in the new year – around the same time that Liddiment is due to publish his findings – bemoaned the "obvious unhealthy lazy arguments from certain members of the media" that Radio 2 had gone too young. "Anybody who works in radio knows that we are not chasing the younger listener, we are chasing the family. Whether you are seven years old or 107 years old ... we're not chasing, that's who we've always aimed Radio 2 at, and I'm very happy to be part of that armoury." Targeting seven-year-olds? It's even worse than commercial radio thought.
?Among the many BBC executives' expenses claims was the £19.13 put through by Richard Deverell, chief operating officer for the BBC's new northern base in Salford, spent on external hospitality "trying to persuade him to join the BBC". We know not who it was, or whether it was successful, but we wonder whether Deverell could have tried a bit harder.
?The London Evening Standard's list of the 1,000 most influential Londoners is not entirely ruthless when it comes to defining a "Londoner", it would appear, containing as it does the likes of Rupert Murdoch, David Beckham, Madonna and California-based Apple designer Jonathan Ive. They are many things, but not necessarily what you would call London-based.
?Monkey has just got over Charles Spencer's review of Anna Friel in Breakfast at Tiffany's ("long stretches of the action in her underwear … a thrilling frisson of eroticism"), only to find the Daily Telegraph theatre critic has been at it again. Spencer, you'll recall, coined the phrase "theatrical Viagra" for Nicole Kidman's performance in The Blue Room. The new object of his affection is Kelly Brook in the theatre version of Calendar Girls. "It's true that Miss Brook seems to find it pretty tricky to walk and talk at the same time," wrote Spencer. "But my, what a delightful eyeful Kelly Brook is, shaking her great mane of golden hair like a proud lioness and covering her modesty with iced buns." Is that a theatre review in your pocket or are you just pleased to see me?
?To the British Society of Magazine Editors awards at the Park Lane Hilton, where the host and resident BBC1 standup comic Michael McIntyre enjoyed lots of fun at the expense of Fabulous magazine until informed it was part of the News of the World. "Oh," he said. "That's my life ruined then." The NME-turned-Top Gear editor, Conor McNicholas, organised the bash and said the next edition of Top Gear will feature the top 10 songs to drive to, admitting it would be made up of the top 10 he was playing in his car. You can take the editor out of NME ...
?Monkey's number of the week: 666,000. The peak audience for Sky1's unfortunate attempts to contact Michael Jackson from beyond the grave with the help of Derek Acorah on the entirely taste-free Michael Jackson: The Live Seance. We always thought it was a bad idea.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
John Naughton: Content is already available free - and consumers never paid a realistic price for it anyway
Les Hinton, now departed for Dow Jones, would never have allowed the paper to make such intemperate attacks on Gordom Brown
Bloggers unite in their dim view of Rupert Murdoch and his views on Google, but further job losses at Lloyds reset the dividing line
As the BBC gets more transparent, so do its enemies' motives The BBC has real questions to answer about the salaries of its top executives. But that's not why it's under attack
The BBC's Mark Thompson: unlikely to jump ship for ITV. Photograph: Richard Sake
The BBC gets a serious kicking today over the salaries of senior executives – not surprisingly led by the Murdoch press. The Times splashes: "37 BBC staff earn more than the Prime Minister."The Sun adds: "Oceans of BBC exes." (See what they did there? Mark Thompson stayed in the Las Vegas hotel featured in Ocean's Eleven). The Telegraph weighs in with: "BBC pays its 100 most senior staff £20m a year." And the Daily Mail adds: "The bloated Beeb: BBC pays out £20m to top 100 'decision-making' executives including the 'outreach boss' (so that's where the licence fee goes)." (The Mail, of course, pictures Jay Hunt because, counter-intuitively, there is nothing the Mail hates more than a successful woman). In these straitened times, with media organisations cutting back all around, it is easy to target BBC salaries. Thompson argues that the corporation must pay "market rates". That might have been true a few years ago. But it certainly isn't true now. Very few of these execs are likely to jump ship to ITV. And the digital revolution companies may have created some billionaires but, on the whole, they are leaner, smaller organisations than the traditional media behemoths. But once salaries have risen, it is hard to claw them back. Not many people like taking a pay cut. And now, with the economic meltdown sapping the BBC's commercial rivals, and a Tory government on the horizon, this makes the corporation vulnerable. The "even greater transparency" offered by the BBC in the interests of accountability has just been made into a new stick to beat them with. And allowing Tory MP Philip Davies to say: "It illustrates probably better than anything else than we have ever seen why the BBC's funding needs to be radically reduced to enable it to focus on what it should be doing." And therein lies the rub. Some BBC salaries may be unnecessarily high. It is ridiculous that 37 BBC staff are paid more than the prime minister. Although maybe that is a reflection of the peculiarly low pay grade afforded the chief executive of UK plc. The BBC is a big organisation that does require a lot of managing. But the real reason it is getting a caning here is because the Tories have realised that there is a lot of political support to be gained by attacking the BBC. Not as a straightforward votewinner, but by ensuring the support of papers from an organisation with an inbuilt desire to weaken the BBC. Rupert Murdoch wants to make money from the web. The free nature of the web is his biggest problem. But the fact that there is an enormous news organisation in Britain providing for free a lot of the things that he thinks News Corp should be paid for is also a pretty big stumbling block. The BBC should be accountable. Perhaps some of its executives are paid too much. But the BBC is also a national asset that shouldn't be beaten up for everything that it does. And although of course they aren't funded by the licence-payer, it would still be interesting to know how many News Corp executives are paid more than the prime minister.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
Prime minister and media tycoon spoke after paper's coverage of 'misspelt' letter to Jacqui Janes
The Sun goes to town on Gordon Brown. Plus, Melvyn Bragg returns to BBC television. And which columnist would you pay to read online? With Matt Wells, Maggie Brownand Steve Ackerman
David Banks was one of the first print journalists to grasp both the theory and practice of digital journalism
It makes them look unprincipled and probably won't help them win elections either, saysAlexander Chancellor
Lola Adesioye: By backing Glenn Beck's wild rant that Barack Obama is racist, Rupert Murdoch is as incendiary as his Fox News pundits Forbes power list puts Mexican drug lord ahead of presidents
I generally admire the writings ofChrystia Freeland, the US managing editor of the theFinancial Times, but I haven't much time for her statement applauding the "end of the oversupply of journalism."
Jack Shafer, Slate's excellent media commentator, has seen through the charging-for-content smokescreen erected by Rupert Murdoch in a piece headlined Read between the lies
Prime minister phoned News Corp chief to complain about paper's campaign against the government's handling of the Afghanistan war. By Roy Greenslade
Sandra Guzman alleges that Rupert Murdoch's US newspaper fostered a 'hostile work environment'
"Give Brown a break"... "Whilst I have every sympathy with Mrs Janes for the loss of her son, personally I would have been more touched that Mr Brown took the time to personally write to her to offer his condolences"... "I hate to say this, BUT, well done Mr Brown for at least writting a letter, right spelling or not"...
In using Jacqui Janes's grief in this way, the newspaper is harnessing its traditional pro-squaddie stance to its Labour-bashing campaign
News Corp chief says prime minister is a friend, but his government has been a 'disappointment'. By Chris Tryhorn
Last week I ran a posting headlined A newspaper lesson for Gordon Brown - Murdoch is not your friend. I argued that the prime minister was fooling himself if he thought the News Corporation chairman was still his mate after agreeing that The Sun should back the Tories
Further to yesterday's story about Rupert Murdoch's search engine sabre-rattling, Murdoch could block Google searches entirely, he also launched yet another assault on the BBC
Rupert Murdoch says he may block Google News from displaying News Corp content to persuade people to pay for his newspaper sites. Who will win this corporate battle?
Rupert Murdoch says he will remove stories from Google's search index as a way to encourage people to pay for content online
When I posted an item on Friday that mentioned the closure of London Lite, a commenter (courtstown) took me to task for a lack of empathy towards staff who will lose their jobs
Yet another digital headache for Rupert Murdoch. His News Corporation is paying more than $1m (£600,000) a month to rent an empty office complex in Los Angeles that it has been unable to sub-lease since scrapping an ambitious plan to moveMySpace and its other digital businesses there
Can Murdoch make a paywall work?
As Murdoch hesitates, there are no simple solutions over charging for digital content
Lord Rothermere, owner of the Daily Mail & General Trust, once rejected launching a free newspaper in partnership with the Norwegian media conglomerate Schibsted because
When I posted yesterday on the remarkable candour of Rupert Murdoch in admitting that he was holding discussions with Telegraph Media Group about website paywalls, some commenters suggested that The Guardian might be involved too
Talks with other publishers to introduce charging on news websites will undoubtedly attract the attention of competition authorities, warns UK expert
Rupert Murdoch's statement about the likelihood of his
newspapers missing the deadline to charge for content reveals the difficulties he is having in convincing rival news companies to join his paywall construction company
UK's largest news aggregator publishes open letter denying it is undermining publishers' businesses. By Mercedes Bunz
So the prime minister thinks The Sun, in trying "to become a political party", has made "a terrible mistake". Where has Gordon Brown been living all his life?
Culture secretary warns of threat to arts sector's independence and encroaching influence of Rupert Murdoch
The headline on the press release, "News International to stop distributing 'bulks'", may not be quite what it says on the tin
Rupert Murdoch has today reiterated his belief that internet users will pay for content, saying they would be happy to shell out for "information they need to rise in society".
Murdoch, the chairman and chief executive of News Corporation, gave a wide-ranging address to US media regulators that attacked internet news aggregation as "theft" and claimed that advertising-only business models were dead.
"From the beginning on, newspapers have prospered for one reason: giving readers the news that they want," he said. He said newspapers should not blame technology if they failed. "If we fail, we fail like a restaurant that makes meals that no one wants to eat." His company's customers were "smart enough" to know they had to pay for news, Murdoch told a US Federal Trade Commission workshop on the future of journalism in the internet age. Referring to his much-criticised plans to put his newspaper sites behind a paywall, Murdoch said he had succeeded before when nobody had believed he would, adding: "We started Fox when everyone said it couldn't be done." One News Corporation newspaper, The Wall Street Journal, already charges for content and has 1 million subscribers. "We will expend to extend this model to all our news organisations such as the Times in London. At The Times, there are journalists who invested days and weeks into their stories, and our customers are smart enough to know that they can't get something for nothing," he said. "Producing journalism is expensive. We invest tremendous resources in our project from technology to our salaries. To aggregate stories is not fair use. To be impolite, it is theft. "Without us, the aggregators would have blank slides. Right now content producers have all the costs, and the aggregators enjoy [the benefits]. But the principle is clear. To paraphrase a great economist, [there is] no such thing as a free news story." Murdoch said that making the reader pay was the only way to create future revenue streams: "The business model that relies on advertising-only is dead. Online advertising is increasingly only a fraction of what is being lost from print advertising, and it is under constant pressure." Murdoch, who read his speech from printouts and not his laptop at the FTC workshop, announced that News Corporation had worked on a two-year project to spread news content from TV and newspapers to mobile devices, because "today's news consumers do not want be chained to boxes in their homes". He attacked plans to protect newspapers with public funds, saying it could damage democracy. It would lead to "papers giving up their rights to endorse politicians". "In other words, it subsidies their failures. The press is the only institution that is truly accountable. The founding fathers put the first amendment first for a reason." Murdoch ended his speech with a plea to adhere to a series of clear principles in the digital world. "Let them innovate when they want and how they want. Let consumers pay. Let aggregators desist and start employing their own journalists. "When we think of the future of newspapers, we think of the future of democracy. It doesn't matter if we are reading our news from paper or on another device, but the basic truth is that to make informed decisions free man and women need news. If they come on electrons or dead trees is not that important. Therefore the news industry should remain free and competitive." Two men heckled Murdoch as he ended his speech, shouting from the audience: "Do you agree that Obama is a racist?" This was a reference to the controversy surrounding Glenn Beck, the presenter on News Corp-owned Fox News, and his controversial criticism of the US president. Murdoch did not reply as he left the stage at the FTC event and the two men were ushered out quickly.
• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000.
"How will journalism survive in the internet age?" is no ordinary workshop: it's held by the Federal Trade Commission and attended by Rupert Murdoch and Arianna Huffington. By Mercedes Bunz
Michael Binyon's valedictory piece forThe Times today, after 38 years with the paper, gives a candid insight into journalism past with several entertaining anecdotes
The Daily Mirror has been running an investigation this week entitled "Tory cash - the truth". On Tuesday, it was right on the money by accusing shadow chancellor George Osborne of a dodgy expenses claim, eliciting a later response through gritted teeth that it was "a submission error".
Imagine for a moment that a bank employee in the City of London was awarded £800,000 for unfair dismissal after a lengthy period of bullying by his or her boss. I haven't the slightest doubt that it would be a major news item in every newspaper - from the Financial Times to the Daily Star
Dan Kennedy: In cosying up to Google's main competitor, Bing, Rupert Murdoch proves once again that he can't be dismissed so easily
Rupert Murdoch's talks with Microsoftabout removing his newspapers' stories from Google, and giving index rights to Bing instead could be a pivotal moment in internet economics, writes John Gapper
Alexandros Stavrakas: The argument over file sharing is redundant: creative businesses must change, and the social value of free must be recognised
Steve Busfield: As News Corp talks to Microsoft over Bing deal, how can the publisher ensure only paying customers see its online content?
The talks with Microsoft, which are at an embryonic stage are part of Rupert Murdoch's drive to create new online revenue streams
Emily Bell,Richard Bacon, Benjamin Cohen, and Josh Hallidayjoin Matt Wells to talk about the future of print, broadcast and online media. Is there any hope for an industry in crisis?
Ever since The Sun switched its allegiance from Labour to the Tories there has been an assumption of some kind of deal between Rupert Murdoch and David Cameron
On the eve of the bill determining Britain's digital future, Ben Bradshaw attacks the Tory leader's 'pact' with the Murdochs and defends the BBC, if not its Trust, from its 'circling enemies'. He speaks to James Robinson
James Murdoch's speech to investors in Barcelona the other day revealed the direction thatNews Corporation plans to take in the coming years. His key quote:
Monkey reports that movie director Edgar Wright is unhappy that The Times ran his blogged tribute to the actor Edward Woodward without his permission as if it were an article written for the paper. How dos this square with Rupert Murdoch's intense dislike for the theft of online content, I wonder?
Charging to read news content is like 'putting genie back in bottle', says Biz Stone
Labour colleagues are concerned business secretary could set precedent that would allow Tories to help Murdoch take on Google
Steve Bell's If ...
Hardly a day goes by without a poll saying how many people will or will not pay for access to online news. Today's survey, courtesy of Forrester Research polled 4,000 people in the US and found that 80% will not pay for online newspapers or magazines
On this day 40 years ago I was a small cog in what proved to be a giant wheel of change in the British newspaper trade. At 22, I was a raw down-table news sub on the first issue of a tabloid newspaper,The Sun
The backlash against The Sun for its treatment of the Gordon Brown letter to Jacqui Janesabout the death of her soldier son in Afghanistan was clear in the weekend newspapers
Steve Bell's If ...
Emily Bell: Rupert Murdoch's threats to block the search engine and build a paywall signal to politicians that he wants something done
On the eve of the relaunch of Wall Street Journal Europe, its new editor-in-chief explains why she returned to journalism and how she will take on Google
Sources: PaidContent/Media Guardian
Here
is the problem: newspaper circulations and ad revenues are in freefall.
Millions of people prefer the online versions and – a bit like Kim
Fletcher and his wife Sarah Sands – prefer their papers in aggregate.
Sadly, the digital titles generate very little cash. Readers who used
to consider it obvious that news came at a price – a cover price – now
want it for free. Murdoch
has read the runes and has decided that the old rules should still
apply: if you want to read his stuff, you're going to have to pay him
for the privilege. Will
it all work out? I don't know. Young people read less real news than
they used to. My son and his friends – all graduates – hardly read news
at all. But it seems to me that Murdoch at least has logic on his side.
If his model fails, then I have no idea what will happen. You
disagree, Herr Professor. Presumably you don't receive cash for
anything you do and are kept afloat by advertisers who support your
many platforms. Or have I got that wrong?
What
journalist is going to want to write for papers who lose 95% of their
readers overnight? Journalists need reach, it's their oxygen.
Please, Roy, it's people's, not peoples'. Sub, anyone? Anecdotal
evidence indicates that in-depth news and comment is becoming
increasingly peripheral to the lives of generation Y, or Z, or whatever
it is these days. Younger twentysomethings are already out of the habit
of reading anything more demanding than special-interest blogs and
their mates' Facebook entries. Do we really want to drive them - as
well as older generations - further away from "serious" sites?
i
gave up newspapers some years ago. I thought I rediscovered news
recently online but I didn't, I rediscovered the discussion. The
problem with offering news is that people will be selective in what
they read. I f i were to subscribe to a guardian site I would expect a
good coverage of those things that interest me or I would stop using
it. I would also stop if I felt the site was being apologist for any
group. I have been in France for two years and the cost of reading any
english paper is extortionate so I read the french Midi-Libre in the
bar. A genuine free press in every sense of the word. I
remember my Dad taking me to the Library to read the papers when I was
little. The internet will be used in the same way. The only solution
would be a paywall for everything. I suppose when the paywall hits the
western press then we will all watch al-jazeera.
Murdoch
should at least be congratulated for attempting to create a more viable
delivery model in respect of the established newspaper titles than
existed before. The question is to what extent readers value content
which has been shaped to confirm a very specific world view. This issue
does not have to be faced nearly as starkly by sites which offer
specialised content e.g. the FT. There
exists also the question of whether much of what passes for journalism
offers any essential added value rather than a mere distraction which
could be obtained from innumerable free sites. What value can be placed
on the opinions or reportage of an English graduate when operating well
outside their sphere of competence? On
the web there exists specialist sites where the content and
journalistic endeavour is highly focused. These potentially must be
attractive to advertisers and cohorts of readers. This raises the
question as to whether general news media have a future per se. Lastly
there is the issue of censorship: it has been very noticeable, for
example, how poor the reporting on the 'War on Terror' has been from
9/11 onwards. It is also very noticeable that when a major newspaper
attempts to dangle its toes in the water, they are met with a solid
wall of anger from a select group. So the question is to what extent
should newspapers be constrained by the opinions of a self-important
minority when there are so many blogs that put up two fingers and
discuss freely areas where others fear to tread? How much longer can
you get away with reporting casualty figures or suggesting the war is a
mistake without examining the question 'why' until a satisfactory
answer is given.
@emilybell,
'curtailing the delivery system' has worked extremely well as a model
for lots of other successful information-based businesses - all of them
in fact! and the idea that online news delivery has a billion potential
business models floating around, is severely limited if you want to
remain a quality news organisation. this will always cost a lot of money i
know it's easy to claim that a cranky old man like Murdoch doesn't
understand the rules of the intertubes (personally I think he might),
but what about the whizz kids at Google? they have recently announced a
content-payment structure ... i think they're a much better chance to
do it successfully (despite the fact about 95% of their ideas fail) as
they're in a strong position to leverage news providers to partner with
them
There
is another factor to consider. The existence of web based news services
has changed the relationship between writer and reader. It was a clear
one way transfer with the old paper based systems (if you ignore
readers letters). Now its has become much more bothway. For example, Roy's original article ATL is 462 words long including headings. The
comments BTL so far up to Harbinger at 8.51am are 3622 words. This
means that, purely in numbers of words, in this isolated case 89% of
this part of the Guardian has been contributed free by the readers. I
make no allowance or adjustment for quality either way! If
Murdoch's papers have a similar arrangement then setting up a paywall
will cut his publications off from a large amount of content which they
get for free at the moment.
The
bottom line is that Murdoch has tried this before and quietly dropped
the scheme. Why he thinks it's going to work a second time around beats
me.
@AlanRusbridger - The
Guardian unlike every other newspaper trusts its readers and allows
them as much freedom as possible. And furthermore as Alan here
demostrates is prepared to join in the discussion. The
contrast with Murdoch's empire is very stark. It is run on autocratic
lines where only those opinions that broadly conform to those of the
newspapers are allowed. Some criticism gets through for the sake of
face saving, but in reality commenting on Murdoch's websites is a bit
like offering a comment to the old Pravda. The Mail group is just as bad, probably worse when it comes to censorship and complete disdain for what readers actually think. The
Telegraph is a bit of an eye popper. Either the only people who read
the Telegraph are Colonel Blimps, or they are the only ones allowed
through, or God forbid the world is full of Jingoists!
@AlanRusbridger - The
Guardian unlike every other newspaper trusts its readers and allows
them as much freedom as possible. And furthermore as Alan here
demostrates is prepared to join in the discussion. The
contrast with Murdoch's empire is very stark. It is run on autocratic
lines where only those opinions that broadly conform to those of the
newspapers are allowed. Some criticism gets through for the sake of
face saving, but in reality commenting on Murdoch's websites is a bit
like offering a comment to the old Pravda. The Mail group is just as bad, probably worse when it comes to censorship and complete disdain for what readers actually think. The
Telegraph is a bit of an eye popper. Either the only people who read
the Telegraph are Colonel Blimps, or they are the only ones allowed
through, or God forbid the world is full of Jingoists!
Mr
Greenslade, Mr Rusbridger, the EU could use its own cartel law and ban
Murdoch from using OUR taxpayer-funded satellites for his transmissions
and then having the chutzpah to double- or triple-charge EU citizens
for using their own satellites for his TV and web content. (We still
boycott Murdoch at our house; its feasible). What about lobbying the EU on behalf of the independent media and their supporters?
My
morning routine used to involve reading the Guardian Newspaper either
on my way to work or during lunch break. Since the advent of the
digital version and as I now work from home, I dip into it during the
day and every now and again I feel compelled to add my thoughts on
emotive subjects or to cheer on columnists such as Hadley Freeman,
Marina Hyde or Charlie Brooker. Would
I pay for the privilege? - absolutely not. I'd find another
distraction. The reason is, I don't really come here much for 'news' I
come to be entertained when I'm bored or the work is at a lull period. The
web is a big place... start erecting digital turnstiles and people like
me who don't really care much whether you exist or not will merely
drift away to find other things to pass the time.
Emily
Bell - I'm no Luddite when it comes to online opportunities to spread
news to a wide audience and make money out of it. I don't want to
uninvent the internet, so apologies if my earlier contribution
suggested otherwise.
Let
Murdoch and others charge for their news content and go out of
business. I see only a bunch of regurgitated PR material and week-old
blogger stuff there anyway. The real news is on the blogs - like Guido
Fawkes - and low budget sites like IndyMedia and Holy Moly - way before
it ever gets to established media. Take last week's tube map
'river-gate' as an example. It was all over the blogs days before any
print journalists picked it up. All
a lot of traditional print titles are doing now is acting as
aggregators and editors for news content that's already out there -
some may think there's value in that, but it's exactly what twitter,
facebook, delicious and others are doing in a much more automated and
faster way. And the kids just aren't reading tabloids any more. If
RM wants to make money from selling internet content in this world,
it's going to have to be pretty special content. I'm thinking less
news, more exclusive interviews. To sell, you have to provide content
you can't get anywhere else; like the sports on Sky.
Newspapers
and their ilk will always get a small slice of total ad revenue as long
as Google dominate so dramatically the placement of ads across the
internet. If they wanted to make more they would invest jointly in a
competitor and then cease buying from Google en-masse.
As
much as I hate the vile Murdoch Empire and everything it stands for, I
think caution is required when assuming charging for online news will
fail. Here is a vicious media group who can swing a general election
with a biased newspaper cartel. News International now provide all
commercial radio news in the UK (and beyond). Who would have thought in
1988 that we would have to pay to watch most sport on TV? - This group
has a history of getting its way - I wouldn't be surprised if it owned
the worldwide web in a few years
i
gave up newspapers some years ago. I thought I rediscovered news
recently online but I didn't, I rediscovered the discussion. The
problem with offering news is that people will be selective in what
they read. I f i were to subscribe to a guardian site I would expect a
good coverage of those things that interest me or I would stop using
it. I would also stop if I felt the site was being apologist for any
group. I have been in France for two years and the cost of reading any
english paper is extortionate so I read the french Midi-Libre in the
bar. A genuine free press in every sense of the word. I
remember my Dad taking me to the Library to read the papers when I was
little. The internet will be used in the same way. The only solution
would be a paywall for everything. I suppose when the paywall hits the
western press then we will all watch al-jazeera.
Murdoch
is just going to add the Times to one of his Sky packs - so people will
not actively be choosing to pay for it but their overall subscription
will go up £2 a month and it will be included. Since Sky is a monopoly
they can do that.
The simple reason that the Murdoch clan want the BBC to charge is to create another monopoly for themselves in the UK. The
demise of newspapers is near because of censorship of contributors. It
will be the blogs that will win if newspapers charge for onine content.
I
think one problem is, is that the product (news) is in many cases
non-essential or not good enough. As someone with an interest in
economics I find the blogs (and often their comments) more useful and
better than the pay for sites (a lot of which insisted there would be
no crisis). Non-essential would be the celebrity and much of the sports
journalism. I think in the future there will some paid for news sites,
and these will be of high quality (e.g. the FT) but the weaker ones (I
can't see a valid online model for the Sun), will go back to being
print only and the rest won't survive. It's partly the media's and
Murdoch's fault for dumbing down over the past 30 years. Murdoch is
part of the problem and not part of the solution.
indeed
- the idea that there are only two models to monetise content is short
sighted - i don't think the world is going to change back to the way it
was because Murdoch is a recidivist ;-) I wrote a piece about this for Contagious Magazine: http://farisyakob.typepad.com/ @faris
The
essential problem here as I see it is the Murdoch sites, in the UK at
least, aren't ones that are worth paying for. The Times has dull
regurgitated articles and a style that seems to have missed any of the
advances in website design over the last few years. The Sun is The Sun
and offers little compelling reason to pay for sensationalist showbiz
gossip and over the top football coverage when superior versions can be
found elsewhere. To convince people to change, there needs to be carrot as well as stick.
harbinger "commenting on Murdoch's websites is a bit like offering a comment to the old Pravda." You can say that again! during
the Gaza massacre i left a mild-mannered comment on a Danny Finkelstein
article supporting the Israelis. Not only was it never posted, but
after 36 hours there were only 16 posts. All of them supporting Israel. Disgraceful. Thank god for the Guardian
The
comments have run on without my being able to respond until now. There
is an obvious forecasting split between those who believe paywalls will
work and those who don't. We shall, of course, see about that. I
note that <strong>Alan Rusbridger</strong> and
<strong>Emily Bell</strong> have dealt with Guardian
online's losses and revenue. So I've no need to add to that, except to
say that GMG's financial numbers are transparent. And,
lest the point did not get across,
<strong><em>ALL</em></strong> media companies
are in trouble. I spoke about this last week in an interview with
<strong>Rory McLeod</strong>. Hear it at http://www. @<strong>Waltroon</strong>, I am a paid contributor to The Guardian, online and print (as you probably well know). @<strong>ClaireinOz</strong>,
I plead guilty to the subbing error. Your other point is one that I am
pursuing all the time. There is a profound change in interest in news,
and not only from the emerging generation. @<strong>SidSmith1</strong>, an interesting idea. Google will like that one. @<strong>newsinusacom</strong> I
did benefit from my university fees being paid but, as a mature
student, I paid for everything else (by casual subbing at weekends on
the <strong>Sunday Mirror</strong> and
<strong>Reveille</strong>). I
am not a media Trustafarian ring fenced from this current economic
downturn. I am in the same perilous boat as all working journalists. I
most certainly am concerned about the levels of debt run up by the
government, as every citizen should be. My children and my children's
children may well suffer in future. If
there is only one show in town providing news, whether the BBC or
BBC/Google, it is plainly not plural and definitely not in the best
interests of democracy. (By the way, the BBC agrees). Finally,
I have never owned any Google shares, directly or indirectly. The only
shares I own, or have have ever owned, are some 200 Trinity Mirror
shares. I bought them during the post-Maxwell period specifically to
enable me to attend annual meetings and obtain early copies of annual
reports and accounts. They are, in financial terms, worthless. And they
have not stopped me from being critical of Trinity Mirror when I felt
it necessary.
I
make a point of never knowingly paying for anything connected with
Rupert Murdoch, if I can help it. The exception being Fox Films.
@Landice Guardian's digital revenues have grown ten fold in eight years, to approaching £30m There are examples of youtube, amazon and others
News
reporting has historically been a losing proposition, more often than
not. That fact hasn't always been seen as an impossible situation,
either. We've
had people buying a newspaper simply as a platform for their own views
(Col. McCormick at the Chicago Tribune, Hearst) - if you want to make a
small fortune in newspapers, start with a large fortune. Of course that
meant the playing field wasn't level, because the (losing) newspapers
were being subsidized by other sources of income. Remember when Murdoch
did his price wars to destroy his competition? Same thing. That's what
people do when they hold the public in contempt - they don't believe in the free market of ideas, but try to emulate the old robber barons of industry by making themselves the only game in town. TV
news used to be subsidized by the more popular, cheaper-to-produce
entertainment programs (watch "Good Night and Good Luck"), same as
local phone service was once subsidized by long-distance. For better or
worse, those days are gone. Now everything's supposed to be its own
profit center. The
US has PBS (TV) and NPR (radio) and I would guess those are getting
more popular for news as network news gets shorter and fluffier, and
cable news gets more partisan and less reliable. Americans also have
access, through the internet, to news media from around the world -
including the Guardian. Obviously that means the Guardian is much more
influential now, as are their commentators. Remember
when the NYT put all their columnists behind the pay wall? Krugman
suddenly went from being read by everyone to being read by relatively
few - and this in the middle of the economic debacle. What Murdoch
defines as 'good' is what the rest of us define as 'bad'. The
current problem seems to be that advertising isn't working as a
subsidy. Either advertising techniques have to improve, or another
subsidy has to be found or invented. I just don't think online
subscriptions are going to work.
I for one praise The Guardian for its digital content and further more its editorial attitude and guidelines.
I for one praise The Guardian for its digital content and further more its editorial attitude and guidelines.
My
interest is content quality, not the medium of delivery. Elsewhere on
this site I've been castigated by posters for apparently wanting to
flush all papers down the plughole right now.
I agree these are still early days, horribly exciting days, if you like.
However,
it's a fact that if you going to charge for viewing, or to make your
money from advertisers impressed by the passing eyeball numbers, then
you will need good content to lure an audience. And that has a price.
It's
great that the Guardian is open about the current gap between accrued
revenue on this excellent site against operating and Capex costs. It's
still a sound investment for the future.
I
think the real danger is to the big regional groups as they belatedly
try to gear up for the adventure. Many are already running their
limited lifespan print operations on an editorial shoestring and their
content will not have the gravitas to hold an audience.
What
a dilemma.... their weakened newspapers are losing a dying or
disinterested readership too quickly, and not making enough money to
properly fund website development or sustain editorial operations
capable of changing up a gear and producing dynamic content for print
or online.
Some
are turning themselves inside out to solve this and, as the internet
adventure settles down into a more lucrative future, they will face two
further threats to their online revenue streams.
Firstly,
start-up costs and overheads for a website are much lower than those
for a print operation. I reckon a couple of good, commercially aware
journalists and a part-time ad rep will be able to give them a run for
their money in some markets.
The
regional media operations also face losing a chunk of their bread and
butter advertising because web-savvy small businesses are picking up
customers directly through their own online sites. They don't need a
middleman, at least not one that wants to charge what the traditional
newspaper groups will need to do to make their required profit margins.
This
week, having had to break into my home following a lost key fiasco, I
simply put the name of my small town and 'odd job man' into Google. Up
came names within a 10 miles radius, mostly on 'homemade' off-the-shelf
websites. A phone call later I had a guy living three street away
willing to come round the next day to fix my door.
I
didn't even need to go to the local newspaper website, and he hadn't
paid to advertise. He told me he stopped 'using the papers' about a
year ago and relied on his 'page' and people passing on his website
address and mobile number via email and social networks.
He
provided an excellent service. Unless media businesses do the same they
will have wasted online investment money while not making the maximum
out of their print offerings in the meantime.
22 Sep 09, 3:12pm
I wonder what they'd be holding it (their nerve) for? As @emilybell has said
http://www.guardian.co.uk/
or maybe Guardian will become official Google partner, break even and remain free!
22 Sep 2009, 12:43PM
I think it might work.
Google is talking about administering such a set-up. It needs to operate as follows:
A known company (eg, Google) runs a one-stop registration process. You get access to every major newspaper in the world. It's cheap.
If it became popular, you might even find sites that are currently free, including blogs, opting to move inside the system on the basis that tuppence a month is better than now.
Rupert
Murdoch already has an exceptionally well proven business model for
charging for content that used to be free. It's called the Sky Sports
Pack, Children's Pack, News & Events Pack etc. As
Film 4 found out, it's true that very few people are interested in
paying to subscribe to individual channels/publications. But Sky has
proved that people are perfectly happy to pay for a combination pack of
services that appeal to their particular interests. Ask
consumers if they would pay for a package of internet services (say a
'current affairs pack', a 'music pack' or a 'sports pack' that included
the leading publications in the field as well as video content and
access to comment from the leading experts) and, I think, you'll get a
rather different answer.
I am sorry about thelondonpaper journalists losing their jobs, of course. Stefano Hatfield and his team are not to blame for what has happened.
But I cannot mourn the closing of a paper that should never have been launched in the first place. It has accomplished nothing of benefit for London (despite my colleague, Stephen Brook's belief that it punctured the London Evening Standard's relentless negativity and Simon Fletcher's argument about
it challenging a monopoly).
In truth, it was a quasi-paper, a worthless article that made no positive impact of any kind, on London or on journalism. It looked fine enough.
There were occasional articles of interest. But the overall package, with its repurposed agency copy and accent on entertainment trivia, was wholly unmemorable.
Then again, it did not purport to be anything else. It was published to be discarded. It was journalistic sleight of hand, the culmination of the British popular
newspaper trend throughout the last 40 years - a paper with content to amuse and not a paper with content to use. It interested the public
(well, it diverted some of them) without concerning itself with the public interest. Like almost all free newspapers (with honourable exceptions)
it was designed to turn a profit - from advertising revenue - and the editorial content was nothing more than a superficial dressing.
Of course, the difference with thelondonpaper is not only that it never did turn a profit, it never had a hope of doing so.
It was published specifically to spike DMGT's guns and to make life impossible for the Standard. It certainly achieved that. It was a war of
attrition launched by a media mogul who could not bear to see that another media outfit had managed to put one over on him by making money
from the morning free, Metro. Much as I admire Murdoch, I think his strategy stank. He has crippled DMGT and forced it into a sale of the Standard.
He has suffered losses himself, but the big loser is undoubtedly Lord Rothermere's company.
On Murdoch's part, it has been a disgraceful business from pointless start to humbling finish.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/aug/24/thelondonpaper-rupert-murdoch-news-international
Why Murdoch closed the London Paper
Rupert Murdoch last week pulled the plug on his London freesheet, ending a bitter rivalry with Associated Newspapers
Rupert Murdoch and Financial Times CEO John Ridding sure like talking about why newspapersshould charge for content—
but few papers have followed FT.com in charging and none are yet as squarely behind Murdoch. Ridding appears in yet another newspaper
today (NYTimes.com), talking up the paid content paradigm. But what's in it for them if other titles follow their lead?
FT.com MD Rob Grimshaw told me in an interview earlier this month: "We have been the black sheep of the industry for seven or eight years
but we believe very passionately that it was the right thing to do…. We would like other publishers to join up".
He continues: "Our experience has been so positive—we can't understand why they have been so reluctant." But why does the FT want to stop feeling like
an outsider as the sole UK national newspaper to charge online? Put simply - if other, general-interest titles start asking for money, FT.com's existing,
high-end paid-for news might also seem worth handing over cash for. That would make it easier for FT.com to build on its current 117,000 paying subscribers.
Likewise, the normally less open Murdoch is trying to soften up rivals to follow him in charging, fearing that, if he raised the wall alone, he might find readers
knocking on other doors. I asked Grimshaw whether the forthcoming Sundaytimes.co.uk could make a success of charging for content. No comment on that one,
but he added: "In general, we don't see any reason why paid content has to be confined to niche marketplaces." It's an uncomplicated plea to publishers to boost
their revenues—and the FT's—by supporting a single paid model. But Ridding and Murdoch are well aware that if publishers clubbed together to so much
as discuss an industry-wide willingness to charge—let alone a shared technology or cartel—the UK's Competition Commission might express displeasure.
So what better way to side-step that problem than by having the debate in public… ?
Trinity Mirror (LSE: TNI) CEO Sly Bailey and Guardian Media Group CEO Carolyn McCall told the Culture and Media Select Committee in June that competition
laws banned them from meeting to talk about how to tackle "superdominant Google (NSDQ: GOOG) News". Publishers in the US had to meet in private
to escape the attention of anti-trust authorities. By making public statements, rather than agreeing private strategies, they escape risk of antitrust action
The Australian tycoon may head a $33bn (£20bn) global newspaper and television empire, but even billionaires can do with a little extra pocket money now
and then. It has emerged that the News Corporationchairman has made his yacht, Rosehearty, a 183ft (56-metre) "aluminium masterpiece", available for
holiday rents – although of course only those with quite a few million of their own need apply. The charter company CharterWorld.com is listing the three-year-old
yacht for hire in the Mediterranean or Caribbean, boasting "magnificent" performance and "a stunning interior by famous French designer Christian Liaigre" that
includes "full beam owner's suite with king bed and sitting area". The yacht's two tenders, reportedly named Grace and Chloe after Murdoch's young twin daughters,
are included, along with two dinghies complete with instructor, six sets of dive gear, and nine plasma TVs. Photographs on the company's site of the interior
reveal the 78-year-old to have a minimalist taste in interior design that one might suggest (though not in any outlet owned by NewsCorp) borders on the bland.
The spacious main salon features a large sofa in beige, the same colour as featured in the internal reception rooms, and, for the sake of consistency,
the bedrooms. A similar approach to colour characterises its exterior – hull and masts are a brilliant, uninterrupted white. Hugo Andreae, editor-in-chief
of the magazine Superyacht World, said at 56 metres the Rosehearty was certainly "up there" in terms of luxury and scale, but was by no means among
the flashiest of vessels favoured by the super-rich. "A few years ago that would have been a pretty sizeable yacht, but these days you regularly build up to
100 metres." With even Murdoch's relative tiddler costing an estimated €30m, however, Andreae said it was not unusual for the super-wealthy to offer their
yachts for charter "to offset the enormous costs. There are certainly bigger and more luxurious boats available." He added that those hiring a boat would
not be made aware of its owner's identity. "It's a very discreet world, for obvious reasons." According to enthusiasts who have posted sightings on the web,
the Rosehearty has recently sailed around Alaska, where Murdoch has reportedly been holidaying with the actor Mel Gibson, according to Gawker.com.
One spotter on the site yachts.monacoeye.com reported that she arrived two days ago in British Columbia, Canada, commenting: "What a beauty!"
Others who have first-hand experience of the Rosehearty are the Conservative leader, David Cameron, who in October took a private jet to the Greek island
of Santorini where the yacht was moored in order have drinks on board with the NewsCorp chairman. Singer Billy Joel, a sailing enthusiast, has also reportedly
spent time on board with Murdoch and his wife, Wendi Deng. The billionaire has been a yachting fan for some time, marrying Deng on board the Morning Glory
in New York harbour in 1999. At 48 metres, however, that boat was evidently not large enough for his growing second family; happily, Murdoch found another
media tycoon on whom to offload it – the Italian prime minister, Silvio Berlusconi.
Richard Branson's private island, Necker, is available for private hire for $51,000 (£30,000) a night, with a minimum stay of five nights. The 74-acre island,
part of the British Virgin Islands, can accommodate up to 28 people. The £80m Maltese Falcon yacht of Tom Perkins, a Silicon Valley billionaire, can be hired
for £300,000 a week, and comes with four dinghies, two windsurfers and a jet ski. It can accommodate 16 guests, with 18 crew. Musha Cay, a group of 11
islands in the Bahamas owned by David Copper–field can be rented from $37,500 for 12 people to $46,500 for 24 people. The islands have five guest houses,
40 beaches, a gym, and other facilities. Mick Jagger lets out his oceanfront villa, Stargroves, in Mustique. The six-bedroom Japanese-style villa comes with
a large koi pond, a freshwater swimming pool and croquet court. There is also a cook, butler and gardener. It is available for £6,500 a week between May
and December. Goldeneye, an 18-acre estate in Jamaica, was originally owned by Ian Fleming, creator of James Bond, and is where he wrote 17 of his novels.
It is now owned by Chris Blackwell, founder of Island Records. The estate and its three villas can be rented, with the main villa costing from $2,500 a night.
Help Rupert - rent his yacht Fancy chartering a yacht? Then why not enjoy a week aboard Rupert Murdoch's 184ft (56m) Rosehearty, described
as an "aluminium masterpiece" with a "stunning interior by famous French designer Christian Liangre". It isn't exactly cheap. Gir just one ween the rental charge
is $310,00 (£200,000). Still, a media mogul running a loss-making corporation has to make ends meet somehow. Sources (plus pictures :Cityfile/monacoey
Rupert Murdoch and Financial Times CEO John Ridding sure like talking about why newspapersshould charge for content—but few papers have followed FT.com MD Rob Grimshaw told me in an interview earlier this month: "We have been the black sheep of the industry for seven or eight years but So what better way to side-step that problem than by having the debate in public… ? Trinity Mirror (LSE: TNI) CEO Sly Bailey and Guardian Media Group CEO Carolyn McCall told the Culture and Media Select Committee in June that competition laws banned them from meeting to talk about how to tackle "superdominant Google (NSDQ: GOOG) News". Publishers in the US had to meet in private to escape the attention of anti-trust authorities. By making public statements, rather than agreeing private strategies, they escape risk of antitrust action
FT.com in charging and none are yet as squarely behind Murdoch. Ridding appears in yet another newspaper today (NYTimes.com), talking up the paid
content paradigm. But what's in it for them if other titles follow their lead?
we believe very passionately that it was the right thing to do…. We would like other publishers to join up". He continues: "Our experience has been so
positive—we can't understand why they have been so reluctant." But why does the FT want to stop feeling like an outsider as the sole UK national newspaper to charge online? Put simply - if other, general-interest titles start asking for money, FT.com's existing, high-end paid-for news might also seem worth handing over cash for. That would make it easier for FT.com to build on its current 117,000 paying subscribers. Likewise, the normally less open Murdoch is trying to soften up rivals to follow him in charging, fearing that, if he raised the wall alone, he might find readers knocking on other doors. I asked Grimshaw whether the forthcoming Sundaytimes.co.uk could make a success of charging for content. No comment on that one, but he added: "In general, we don't see any reason why paid content has to be confined to niche marketplaces." It's an uncomplicated plea to publishers to boost their revenues—and the FT's—by supporting a single paid model. But Ridding and Murdoch are well aware that if publishers clubbed together to so much as discuss an industry-wide willingness to charge—let alone a shared technology or cartel—the UK's Competition Commission might express displeasure.
At least 15% of coverage in the national press on a daily basis comes from SWNS. Based in the heart of the South West, with key regional reporters working for both The Sun and the Daily Telegraph in-house and a team 72 Point - Why PR?
of dedicated news reporters, photographers and features writers - SWNS has been producing stories and pictures for the national press for over 40 years. Most importantly - what makes in print leads the news agenda for all
other types of media on any given day, be it online, radio or TV, with stories generated by SWNS fining their way literally around the world. 72 Point is the only PR agency in the UK that works hand in hand with a national
news agency and the only PR agency specialising in national news. Take a look at some 'Frequently Asked Questions' below: Q: Why is PR important?
72 Point - About Us 72 Point is part of the SWNS Group ? the UK?s largest independent press agency and newswire service.
Our relationship with SWNS secures our position as national news PR specialists. No other agency has: Direct access to a newswire which every media organisation in the
country subscribes to., A news desk which takes daily calls from editors on the hunt for stories - it could be yours on our list, Journalists from the Sun, Daily Telegraph and
women's magazines working in the same building, Over 100 trained journalists, photographers and feature writers, Direct access to Onepoll.com - the UK's leading supplier
of survey-based national news
Click on the following links to see information about SWNS, 72 Point, Onepoll.com and the other parts of our company?
SWNS South West News Service, the largest independent press agency in the UK http://www.swns.com
72 Point Ltd National News PR Specialists 72 Point Plus Ltd Specialist Media Relations, Communication Consultancy, Issues Management, Public Affairs,
Event Management and more
OnePoll.com Global Market Research Specialists http://www.onepoll.com/ YoungPoll Youth based Market Research Specialists (soon to come)
Ventutec Ltd Specialists in Website Design and Development, SEO (Search Engine Optimisation) and PPC (Pay Per Click)
http://www.ventutec.com/ Click here to enquire about any of our Services Or simply call us on 0117 9066 555.
72 Point's Finance Clients include:
Click to read more What he does: As News Editor, Andy has played a major role in the development of scores of young journalists' careers. He has also overseen many major stories, including the Fred West story and numerous Royal exclusives. Before 72 Point: Andy has ink is his veins, as the son of the great Daily Mirror journalist Syd Young, he became one of the UK's youngest ever staff reporters when he landed a job on Eddy Shah's ground-breaking Today newspaper in the mid-80s. After three years with Today and having turned down a number of lucrative offers within the industry Andrew took up the offer of a partnership with SWNS. Likes: Beer, cigarettes and pressure. Dislikes: Fluffy PR Bunnies.
Clients: Oversees all accounts. What he does: Internet, PR, marketing and helping people with problems.
Before 72 Point: John began his career with ICL, before being headhunted by Siemens to manage new business. After five years with the company he became involved as an Equity Partner with Exepos Software Solutions, a specialist software company. Within its first year John negotiated a £500,000 software order with ASDA supermarkets. This was to launch the company towards a successful trade sale in 1996 for £3.6M to Lynx Plc, who were listed on the main London stock market.
After a two-year Sabbatical during which John helped raise his young family, he formed Phase 8, a company which specialised in investing in internet start-up ventures. Following the acquisition of a small number of internet infrastructure companies and after just 14 months trading, Phase 8 was sold to Namesco Ltd for £3.4M. He then approached SWNS to form 72 Point Ltd. Likes: His kids, the internet, coffee, Redbull, Karaoke and George Best. Dislikes: Decaffeinated coffee, the tube and museums.
Joined 72 Point: Sept 07 Click to read more Clients: Works on all accounts. What he does: Specialises In - Creative idea generation, copywriting, news generation and training.
Before 72 Point: Doug joined SWNS from college in 1994. During his six years as a reporter with the agency he broke a string of world exclusives including the divorce of Camilla and Andrew Parker Bowles. He also worked on huge news stories such as the death of Diana Princess of Wales and the House of Horrors murders in Gloucester. He moved to The Sun in January 2001 and in 2002 was head-hunted to run Safeway's Pro-Active PR operation. He later became senior reporter at Closer magazine before taking over as news editor of lad's mag Zoo. In May 2005 was made news editor on The National Enquirer in the United States. After a year at the Enquirer and six months as deputy news editor at Splash News and Picture Agency in Los Angeles he returned to England as assistant news editor at The Sun. He left The Sun in September to join 72 Point. Likes: The buzz of a big news story, good food, Rioja and my family and friends. Dislikes: Taxes, sarcasm, speed cameras and Marmite.
Clients: Debenhams, Travelodge, WAYN (Where Are You Now?), Cornhill Direct, Cheltenham and Gloucester, Toyota, Green Flag and Thomas Cook. Ad-hoc clients include some of the UK's largest PR agencies such as Weber Shandwick, Taylor Herring, Freud Communications, Ann-Summers, Asda and Fleishman-Hillard. What she does: Web based clients, Finance, Health and Beauty and Fashion. Before 72 Point: Completed a degree in Public Relations and Media Studies in 2003 before working in the Press Office for a large technology company in Bristol. Likes: G & T's, fast food, songs that have a dance routine, anything strangely small and a genuine love of killer heels. Dislikes: Sport of any kind, people that call their cars names and queuing for anything.
Joined 72 Point: September 2002 Clients: Boots, Imperial Leather, Weight Watchers, Toys'R' Us, Ann Summers, Cheltenham and Gloucester and Coors. What she does: Specialises in Health and Beauty, Insurance, Retail and Food and Drink. Before 72 Point: 7 years In-house PR experience - having joined Hill House Hammond Press Office after University Emma quickly became responsible for generating coverage in national, regional and trade press. She also became the face of the company internally; writing and running a successful internal communications course - teaching more than 3,000 staff members. Emma was head-hunted by 72 Point in 2002 and is now the company's longest serving account manager. Likes: Singing, Coronation Street, big men, my children, cake, pyjama bottoms and mascara. Dislikes: Coughing, Champagne and snobs.
Clients: Clerical Medical, Churchill and Travelodge (assisting Account Directors). Ad-hoc clients have included PR agencies such as Kavanagh Communications, Philips, BSkyB, Co-Operative Bank, Biss Lancaster and Seal Communications.
What he does: New business development, campaign research, data analysis and Account Management. Before 72 Point: BA Honours PR degree at Bournemouth University with a placement year at 72 Point and sponsorship for the final year.
Likes: Current affairs, cycling, running and all things sporty. Dislikes: Sitting down for too long, slow walkers and unnecessary noise.
Specialises in: Generating new business and providing database support to the sales team. Clients: Waitrose, Choices Videos, Halifax, Co-op Financial Services, MBNA, CLS, Skipton Building Society, SKY, Jamjar cars, Weber Shandwick (Manchester), Green Flag, Chelsea Building Society, Airtours,Littlewoods, Asda What she does: Initially brought on to develop new accounts, Mary now heads up the company's northern division. She is responsible not only for business development but ensuring ongoing accounts run smoothly. She regularly travels up and down the country in search of new and challenging briefs from small web based companies to large Corporates, Financial Institutions being just one of her favorites! Before 72 Point: After completing a BA Hons from London University in History, Mary worked in Sales/ Marketing and PR or KP Foods in London. She was then promoted to HQ United Biscuits working in National Accounts. Moving on to Esselte Letraset to work in International Publicity, after 3 years she joined WH Smith Group working in Sales and Marketing where she continued to be successful. After taking time out to have three beautiful boys, Mary resumed her career in 2001 when she joined 72 Point. Likes: Jewelry; especially diamonds and pearls (shame she can't afford them) wine, James Bond movies, politics, shoes and handbags. Dislikes: Pretentious intellectuals, Big Brother, bad language and bad manners.
Kathy De Mattia Job Title: PR Account Director Joined 72 Point: February 2008 Click to read more Clients: Aston Manor, the National Association of Cider Makers, Distell Wines and Bristol Rugby. What she does: Working in the PR department, Kathy manages campaigns for various national clients. Her role is to make her clients famous through both the trade and consumer media. Before 72 Point: Kathy worked in London for various high profile brands, including Pepsi, Mars and O2 Mobile. Likes: Alan Carr, playing golf, New York and the fall of Kerry Katona! Dislikes:Meetings about meetings, people who don't say thank you or sorry and lime chutney.
What he does: As Picture Editor, Paul has overseen this department's phenomenal period of progress and success over the last decade.
Before 72 Point: Joined the Bath Chronicle in 1988 as a photographer before carrying out shifts for every national newspaper. Likes: Checking bank statements. Dislikes: Fluffy PR Bunnies.
Clients: Works on all client accounts. What he does: Creative idea generation, copywriting, news generation and training. Before 72 Point: Jay's career in journalism began in 1981 when he landed the job of assistant news editor on the legendary music magazine Sounds. In 1985 he moved into mainstream journalism, running the Newcastle bureau of CNA News Agency where he was one of the first reporters on the scene of the 1988 Lockerbie air disaster. Jay joined SWNS in 1990 and was quickly promoted to Chief Reporter. After heading the reporting team which broke the Fred West story amongst numerous others, he was made SWNS Partner in 2000 and later went on to set up 72 Point Ltd with John Sewell. Likes: Elvis, and his son Alfie's band Phoenix Cult - "the best unsigned band in the UK". Dislikes: Stalkers, surly non-smokers who make him step off the pavement, Richard Gere, wine bars.
What she does: Harriet manages 72 Point's highly driven business development team. She is responsible for sales, marketing and business relations. As a founding member of 72 Point, Harriet has contributed significantly to the company's growth.
Before 72 Point: Completed a degree in Media Studies at Edinburgh University. Likes: Jon Snow, weird movies and Stella Artois. Dislikes: Corporate spiel and Keira Knightly.
Specialises in: Fashion, Travel and Leisure, Health and Beauty and Event Management. Clients: La Senza, Toni and Guy, Debenhams, Travelodge, Thomas Cook, Julian Graves Alberto Culver and GE Money. Ad-hoc clients include some of the UK's largest PR agencies such as Trimedia Harrison Cowley, Biss Lancaster, BMA Communications and Bray Leino. Before 72 Point: 8 years In-house PR experience. Annabel started working life in the luxury travel industry before re-locating to Bristol in 2001 to join At-Bristol, the city's new Landmark visitor attraction. She initially set-up the brand communication for the corporate events division before being appointed PR Manager - achieving continual national, regional and trade coverage for the attraction as well as organising regular high profile film/exhibition launches, royal visits, photo shoots and national TV/radio campaigns. Likes: Johnny Wilkinson, champagne, log fires and the great outdoors. Dislikes: Baked beans, tequila and Smart cars.
Specialises in: Copywriting Clients: Hi-Tec, Quorn, Jobs2view, Yourpropertyclub, Family Relatives and Legoland Windsor Before 72 Point: Gemma worked as a local newspaper reporter where she went on to complete a Diploma in Journalism. As the only reporter on a weekly newspaper in Somerset she was solely responsible for chasing stories and writing page-ready news copy to strict deadlines. Likes: Take That, Speedway and vodka and lemonade. Dislikes: Flying and multi-storey car parks
Clients: Debenhams, Thomas Cook, HMV and Superdrug. What she does: As a senior member of the sales department, Nicky is highly involved in all sales and marketing processes. She is our first point of contact for new business calls. Before 72 Point: Managed a small telemarketing company in Bristol. Likes: Poker, Reggae and Cosmopolitans. Dislikes: Horses and men that wear flip-flops.
Specialises in: Administration, Accounts and Event Management. What he does: Jo deals with financial management, recruitment and HR issues. Before 72 Point: Engineering and Management Consultancy background. Likes: Thailand, running, wine and her dog. Dislikes: Pete Doherty, rude shop staff and people who mumble.
Specialises in: Generating new business and providing database support to the sales team Clients: Legoland, Lego, Seddons Solicitors, ZPR, Momentum Pictures Before 72 Point: Career break to raise children, prior to that worked in executive support functions at Cisco Systems and Psion PLC. Likes: Wine, yoga, films of Anthony Minghella, good jokes and wine. Dislikes: Big Brother contestants, yob culture, public transport