• Home Page
  • INL_WorldNewsSummary1
  • INL_WorldNews_Summary2
  • INL_News_Features1
  • INL_Movie_News
  • June_July07_News
  • June_JulyA_07_News
  • JUne_July0_NewsC
  • BabyBlackSwanStudy
  • MollyMeldrum_M_Gudinski
  • Ellen_DeGeneres_TV_Show
  • WorldVideoNews_Oct07
  • WorldNews_June-July07D
  • World_News_Nov_2007
  • Bridget's_Daily_TV_Squad
  • Mooly_Bloom_James_Joyce
  • Guestbook
  • YouTube_VideoClips1
  • My_Space-The_Musical
  • InternationalTheatreShow
  • USA_Weekly_News_History1
  • USA_Weekly_News_History2
  • NewYork_What'sNew_Views
  • NewYorkTimesSquare_WebCa
  • SanFranciso-What's-On
  • Freemasonry?_History
  • Live_Leake_Great_Videos
  • Rupert_Murdoch_MediaBarr
  • AustNews_RealEstate
  • Feature-Art_Work
  • INLWorldNews_Dec08
  • INLWorldNews_Jan09
  • Canada_NPRNews
  • EyeWitness_LocalNews
  • USA_Video_News
  • Business_News
  • World_Video_News
  • Entertainment_NewsP1
  • Google's_Best_Videos
  • End_Game_NewWorldOrder
  • USA_2008_Elections
  • CorruptPolice_Queensland
  • WorldNewsHistory1
  • Dublin_Fringe_Festival
  • EdinburghFringe_Festival
  • USAWeeklyNews_Awards
  • Australian_Opera
  • NewsHistory2008-P1
  • WorldNewsHistory2008_P2
  • WorldHistoryNews2008_P3
  • WorldNewsHistory2008_P4
  • WordlHistoryNews2008_P5
  • Walter_Moreira_Salles
  • RippOffClaims
  • Phil_Spector_On_Trial
  • BBC_Video_IPlayer_News
  • DIANA_PRINCESSOFWALES
  • USA_2008_ELECTIONS_P2
  • WorldNews_Nov2008
  • USA_News_November2008
  • Obama_USA_President
  • SCOTLAND'S_CRIMEGANGS
  • MAG_Lloyds_HBOS_FIGHT
  • LiverpoolFC_HicksGillett
  • AustWeekendNews2001
  • White_Gold_Cover_Up
  • Iain_Gunn_Speaks_Out
  • Liverpool_Football_Club
  • Flickr_Christmas_Photos
  • INL_SAUDI_ARABIA_NEWS
  • BrokeBackMountain_Ledger
  • Confucius_Quotations
  • 72Point.com_Best_UKPR
  • saddam_hussein_world
  • INLNewsNewYear_2009
  • BorisJohnson_LondonMayor
  • Gaza_Israel_Hamas_War
  • What Is_The_GazaStrip?
  • World_Protests _Gaza
  • Nov-December08News
  • Photos_Israel _Gaza
  • Gaza_Israel-ConflictNews
  • INLNews_Jan_Feb_2009
  • American_In_Gaza
  • INLWorldNewsJan_Feb2
  • BERRBusinessEnterpriseUK
  • Gaza_Israel_Ceasefire
  • USAWeeklyNews2007_08_P1
  • Give Peace a Chance
  • Yoko_Ono_Life Story
  • John_Winston_Lennon
  • Jonathan_Ross_BBC
  • Russell_Brand
  • Melbourne_2009BushFires
  • INLNews_March09P2
  • Dar_Williams_USAFolkRock
  • INLNews_Hot_Topics
  • INLMarch09News_P3
  • INL_January09_News
  • INLNewsJan_Feb2009_P2
  • INL_MarchNews_P4
  • INLNews_March09_P5
  • INLNews_March09_P6
  • INL News_March09_P7
  • USA_IndependentMedia
  • Bob_Dylan_Story
  • NewYork'sEasterParade
  • UnitedPeaceJusticeMarch
  • Susan_Boyle_Singer
  • INL_WorldNews_April09
  • Naked_Ambition?
  • Sabastian_Diaz_Director
  • NightToRememberNewYork
  • Lloyd_Carew-Reid_Justice
  • FremantleMedia.com
  • PippenDrysdale_FineArts
  • INL's_Croatia_News
  • Austin_Texas_News
  • USA_Festival_Directory
  • Diabetes_News
  • MAY09_INLWorldNews
  • MaliWomen'sPerformingArt
  • INLNov08HistoryNews
  • MichaelJacksonStory1
  • MichaelJacksonMurdered?
  • AmericanUnionMade?
  • DeathofMichaelJackson2
  • MichaelJacksonHistory3
  • HottestWebNews
  • TopMichaelJacksonNews1
  • BloomergBusinessNews
  • FansSuicideOverJackson
  • MackennalEdgarBertram
  • allmichaeljackson
  • INLNewsMarch09P8
  • INLNewsMarch09P9
  • MichaelJacksonMurdered?2
  • INLNewsMarch09P10
  • RunningOfTheBulls
  • MichaelJacksonVideoNews
  • BBC_INLVideoNews
  • AP_INLVideoNews
  • Reuters_INLNewsVideo
  • FOX _INLNewsVideo
  • Fox_INLBusinessNews
  • AFP_INL VideoNews
  • Australia_INLNewsVideo
  • CBC.ca_INLNewsVideo
  • INLJuly09NewsP1
  • INLNewsSept09
  • BrookAstor_AnthonyAstor
  • BNP_UK_NIckGriffin
  • FindMadeleineMcCann.com
  • WorldsMostPowerfulMen
  • AdolfHitler_EvaBrownFilm
  • MurdochToBuyBBCDebate
  • MurdochSaysNoFreeNews
  • MurdochToSueBBCForLosses
  • ABCSlamsMurdochBBCAttack
  • MurdochPapersOpenFireBBC
  • GoogleMurdochDivorcing
  • GoogleCorporateHistory
  • MurdochBuyingUKElection
  • MurdochBuyingUKElection
  • UKWeeklyWorldNewsNov09
  • INLWorldNewsDec2009
  • INLWorldNewsNov2009
  • BilderbergGroupHistory
  • USAFreemasonPresidentsP1
  • USA_PresidentsListP1
  • USA_PresidentsListP2
  • BilderbergGroupHistoryP2
  • BilderbergGroupHistoryP3
  • IlluminatiNewWorldOrder2
  • IlluminatiNewWorldOrder4
  • SurvivalOfElitePyramid
  • CodexAlimentarius
  • JFK_KennedyAssasination
  • RothschildWorldControl1
  • RothschildMurderHistory1
  • WhoRothschildsMurdered2
  • RothschildMoneyControl
  • ObamaAntiChristIdentity
  • RothschildsNewWorld2
  • RothschildsNewWorld3
  • RothschildsNewWorld4
  • RothschildsNewWorld1
  • RothschildsNewWorld2
  • RothschildsNewWorld3
  • RothschildsNewWorld4
  • RothschildsNewWorld6
  • WorldPressTVNewsJan2010
  • RothschildsNewWorld5
  • HitlerWasABritishAgent1
  • WorldGovernmentAgenda1
  • NWOPlanBankingCollapse1
  • USA_Past-Present_Future1
  • USA_Past-Present_Future1
  • AdolfHitler_EvaBrownFilm
  • WikiLeaksJulianAssange
  • IlluminatiNewWolrdOrder1
  • LeoZagami_RealIlluminati
  • Leo_Zagami_Illuminati_P2
  • Leo_Zagami_Illuminati_P3
  • Leo_Zagami_Illuminati_P4
  • Leo_Zagami_Illuminati_P4
  • Leo_Zagami_Illuminati_P6
  • Leo_Zagami_Illuminati_P7
  • Nebra_Astronomical_Clock
  • INLNews_DailyWorldNews_1
  • PeterMoonAussieCommedian
  • AllanBond_DiBliss_WAust
  • Marie-Claire_Bleasdale
  • DidThurmonHaveFairTrial?
  • RebekahBrooks_Arrested
  • MadeleineMcCann_NewProbe
  • VisionWatchReports_2012
  • WorldVisionReportsJune12
  • Scotlands-IndepenceFight
  • HiddenHIstoryOfLondonP_1
  • MicklebergStitchWestAust
  • WhyWasNickClayMurderedP1
  • WhyWasSeanHoareMurdered
  • WhoMurderedThomasAllwood
  • YahooMoviesEntertainment
  • Rebekah_Brooks_Arrested1
  • CIASellDrugs_MediaLiesP1
  • HiddenHistoryOfLondonP_2
  • MrX_InsideFileDisclosure
  • MrWijatsFav_GooglePhotos
  • Assange_FearsMurderInUSA
  • CovertDepopulationTactic
  • WeaponizedWeatherExposed
  • JapaneseEarthquakeDebate
  • GiseldaBlanco_Concaine
  • LakeAnnecyFranceShooting
  • CyberCrimeCyberCriminals
  • RocketKIlledUSAmbassador
  • USCoversUpPolishMassacre
  • FaceBookIsWatchingYouNow
  • DuchessofCambridge_Kate
  • Mash_Before&AfterPhotos
  • AntiDepressantsNightmare
  • JimmySavileBBCdiedAged84
  • JimmySavile_GuradianNews
  • RothschildsMossadMI5_CIA
  • WhoIsZbigniewBrzezinski
  • BillClintons_BodyCountP1
  • RothschildsSpyAgenciesP1
  • BushHadPrior911Knowledge
  • SirFrancisBoyle_Lawyer
  • GlobalResearchWarOnDrugs
  • NATO_OperationGladio
  • RothschildMI5SovietAgent
  • Ostrovsky_WayOfDeception
  • CatarinaMiglioriniBrazil
  • ToKnow_InfiniteAwareness
  • GaryGlitter_PaulGlad_BBC
  • ObamaVRomney_USA_Debate2
  • INLNewsHistory3rdOct2012
  • DailyWorldNews_INLNewsP1
  • ObamaWins2012USAElection
  • ChrisSpiveyWorldPutRight
  • NimbinMardiGrassParade
  • ChippingAwayTheBullSh_t
  • TheSecretTeamLeroyProuty
  • HowTheCIAIsRunSecretTeam
  • PaulaBroadwell_DPetraeus
  • MikeMorrell-CIADirector
  • INLNewsCIAKGBSpyPhotosP1
  • AssassinationBigBusiness
  • MaxwellFrankClifford
  • SandyHookSchoolShooting
  • WhoRunsTheUK_MI5_orThePM
  • SchapelleCorby_SetUp_Why
  • CIA_MindControl_MKULTRA
  • ProjectPaperClip_NaziCIA
  • MI6_GlobalDrugTradeLords
  • HitlersNaziPsychiatrists
  • CIASellsDrugsMediaLies
  • TriumphOfTruthBookStolen
  • CIAMI6ControlDrugDealing
  • MontgomeryClan_Scotland
  • WorldHungerScandal
  • UnfilteredINLWorldNewsP1
  • MeetPrudenceMurdoch
  • IceAgeArt_BritishMuseum
  • FLOURIDEandDEMOCRACY
  • DialMForMurdoch_Hacking
  • ForbesRichList-2013
  • Oxford-LegalAncecdotes
  • LeadBellyBlues1888to1949
  • ScotlandsFreePressAtRisk
  • ScotlandNewPoliceInChaos
  • FutureSpaceSettlementsP1
  • MegaFloods-PastandFuture
  • GeorgeCarlinFamousQuotes
  • HitlerWasABritish
  • EarthPastFutureGlenKealy
  • MargaretThatcherIronLady
  • Lady_MargaretThatcher
  • MadMagazine-History
  • FreemasonHistoryExposed1
  • INL_EntertainmentNews_P1
  • CorruptionHighCourtJudge
  • Freemason-TheBrotherhood
  • BehindSecretClosedDoors
  • Jabobite-MasonControlWar
  • Lord_PatrickStewartHodge
  • MostDangerousMen_History
  • WoolwichAttack-LeeRigby1
  • MI5-behindWoolwichMurder
  • Woolwich-RigbyTerrorNews
  • WhoReallyRunsTheWorld?
  • Murdoch_WendiDengDivorse
  • EdwardSnowden_CIA-Prism
  • HowCIACreatedBinLaden-GL
  • MI6PrincessDiannaMurder1
  • PrincessDiana-MI6Murder
  • LadyGaGa-IlluminatiQueen
  • Psychiatry_DeathIndustry
  • MurderOfPrincessDianaP1
  • CorruptPoliceInAustralia
  • DroneTechnology_Effects1
  • EffectsOfDroneTechnology
  • CorruptPolice_BlueMurder
  • IndianFunnyBlogsPictures
  • IndianInterestingStories
  • WikiLeaks-MIrrors-Cables
  • Assange-AustralianSenate
  • PrinceGeorge_UKRoyalBaby
  • LadyDieFilm_DianaMurder1
  • EdFringe.com2013EdFringe
  • EdFringe.com_2013Fringe2
  • EdFringe.comJustTheTonic
  • EdFringe.comAssembly2013
  • EdFringe.comUnderbelly13
  • WomenWhoWank_FoolishPlay
  • UKLandRegistryCorruption
  • SyriaConflict_IsWarRight
  • MafiaWars_INLNews
  • JusticeForRaymondMcCord4
  • BulgarianMafia-InControl
  • LenWalterBuckeridge_BGC
  • ChineseTriadsInAustralia
  • LenBuckeridgeDiesAged_77
  • MoneyLaundering-Ireland
  • HitlersWarMachine-Farben
  • RothchildsWorldControl3
  • MarkZuckerberg_Zuckerman
  • MarinaKeeganDied-22Years
  • TheDarkAlliance-GaryWebb
  • MoneyChangersHistoryP1
  • TriumphOfTruth-TheBookP1
  • TheGreatAmericanNovel_P1
  • TheGreatAmericanNovel_P2
  • TheGreatAmericanNovel_P3
  • BlueMurder_CorruptPolice
  • ValerieVisitsMateraItaly
  • arcticbeacon.com-radioP1
  • arcticbeacon.com-radioP2
  • Australian_Drug_Busts_P1
  • DrsDie_ForSavingChildren
  • NewAgeGlobalistAgenda_P1
  • Page 372
  • BCCI_Criminal_Network
  • HillaryClintonReport_P.1
  • USElection_TrumpVHillary
  • ClaremontSerialMurdersWA
  • ClaremontSerialKillings2
  • WestAustralianElections
  • DrKarlO'Callaghan-Police
  • MafiaAustraliaDrugMurder
  • DonaldTrump_USAPresident
  • Gus_McCann_Irish_Singer
  • JimMorrisonRidersInStorm
  • Jim_Morrison_TheDoors_P1
  • Khashoggi_Slaying_ News
  • WestAustralianCorruption
  • Storm_DocumentariesP1
  • celebritieswhomarriedfan
  • MostExpensiveProperties
  • Expensivehomesforsale_P1
  • MovieStarsWhoHatedtoKiss
  • Google_Bias_Investigated
  • Glen_Kealy_The Sculptor1
  • JulianAssange_Arrest_P.1
  • JulianAssangeSnowdenFile
  • globalelitetvdocumentary
  • AnnieJacobsen_USA_Author
  • PerthMintSwindleTheMovie
  • TheGreatAmericanNovel4
"...I Love INLNews.com.......INLnews.com is easy to find but hard to leave...."..
Mr Wijat's friend Magic Rabbit 
  http://www.easterlingentertainment.net

INLNews YahooMail HotMail GMail AOLMai

lUSA MAIL YahooMail  HotMailGMail AOLMail MyWayMail CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs
 INLNsNYTimes WashNs AustStockEx WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust 
WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs TasNews ABCTas DarwinNsUSA MA


 
Stories Video/Audio  Reuters AP AFP The Christian Science Monitor U.S. News & World Report AFP Features Reuters Life! NPR The Advocate Pew Daily Number Today in History  Obituaries Corrections Politics   LocalNews BBC News  
 
 
Your Subtitle text

UKLandRegistryCorruption



    International News Limited Domain Pricing Per Year
.com* $9.99 | .net* $9.99 | .org* $9.99 | .info* $9.99 | .us* $9.99 | .biz* $9.99 | .ws* $9.75 | .name* $7.95
Save even more on multi-year registrations!
Visit International News Limited for the best values on: domain names, domain transfers and more!

INLNews YahooMail HotMail GMail AOLMailUSA MAIL
YahooMail HotMailGMail AOLMail MyWayMail CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs
 INLNsNYTimes WashNs 
AustStockEx WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust 
WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs TasNews ABCTas DarwinNs
USA MAI
L


http://www.inlnews.com/Lord_PatrickStewartHodge.php

Your Daily Motivation from Inspiration Line Add Inspiring Daily Quotes to YOUR Website

Click Here For Your Up To Date World Live Sports Scores
INLNews  YahooMail  HotMail  GMail  AOLMail USA MAILMyWayMail 
 CNNWorld IsraelVideoNs INLNsNYTimes WashNs WorldMedia JapanNs AusNs World VideoNs WorldFinance ChinaDaily IndiaNs USADaily BBC EuroNsABCAust 
WANs NZNews QldNs MelbAge AdelaideNs 
TasNews ABCTas DarwinNsUSA MAIL


ABC News Video  FOX News Video  FOXBusiness Video  CNN Video  AP Video  BBC News Video  Reuters Video  AFP Video  CNET Video
CNBC Video  Australia 7 News Video   Rocky Mountain News Elections Video  CBC.ca Video  NPR Audio  
Kevin Sites in the Hot Zone Video
Richard Bangs Adventures Video  Charlie Rose Video   Expanded Books Video  Assignment Earth Video 
ROOFTOPCOMEDY.com Video 
Guinness World Records Video  weather.com Video  AccuWeather Video  You Witness News User Video

NPR Audio BY CATEGORY Top Stories  Politics  World  Business  Sports 
 
Technology  Health & Science  Arts  U.S. 

VIEW LOCAL VIDEO KVUE-TV Austin  WJZ 13 Baltimore  WBZ Boston 
 
WCNC Charlotte  CBS 2 Chicago
CBS 11 Dallas  CBS4 Denver  13 News, WVEC Hampton Roads  11 News Houston  
CBS 2 / KCAL 9 Los Angeles
WHAS TV11 Louisville  CBS4 Miami  WCCO Minneapolis  WWL-TV, 
Channel 4 New Orleans
  CBS 2 New York
CBS 3 Philadelphia KTVK 3TV Phoenix  KDKA Pittsburgh  
KGW NewsChannel 8 Portland, Ore.  WRAL.com Raleigh
CBS 13 / CW 31 Sacramento  KENS 5 - TV San Antonio  Channel 8 San Diego 
 
CBS 5 San Francisco
KING5 Seattle  KREM.com Spokane/Coeur d'Alene  KMOV 
Channel 4 St. Louis
  FOX 11 Tucson

Video by Category
 
U.S. Business  World  Entertainment  Sports  Tech  Politics Science 
Health Environment Weather Opinion  Odd 

Video by Topic Campaign '08   Wall Street  Iraq  Gas Prices  Mideast Conflict 
 
Climate Change 

More INL News Video !Finance Sports


Video by Category
 
U.S. Business  World  Entertainment  Sports  Tech


http://www.inlnews.com/WoolwichAttack-LeeRigby1.php

'The true value of a human being can be found in the degree to which he has attained liberation from the self...' Albert Einstein ...
 Click on the below link to read and see more on Infinite Awareness

http://inlnews.com/ToKnow_InfiniteAwareness.html


The information on page is with compliments from: AWN.bz

Haywicks Farm was to be used as a film set for a new film
that is being written by the INL News Screen Play writer called
                                                     "Fraud and Murder in Haywicks Lane"
staring:
against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice.


The concept of the names used in the film is based on the way the series of books the Triumph of Truth (Who is watching The Watchers?) written by Stephen Carew-Reid and published by the Australian Weekend News a subsidiary of the INL News Group, have been written in that the real name of those mentioned in the books are used to expose the guilty. So the real names of those involved of the fraud and murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the conspiracy to defraud his only child Valerie Ann Butler of her lawful rights to Haywicks Farm will be used in the film to expose the guilty. The film as the books are based on the truth so any attempt to sue for civil or criminal defamation will be vigorously defended by the INL News Group based on the fact the information is the truth and it is in the public interest to show the world of the wrongful actions of those involved in the fraud and murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the conspiracy to defraud his only child Valerie Ann Butler of her lawful rights to Haywicks Far, which includes the wrongful way the High Court of Justice and the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and the masters, clerks, adjudicators, judges  and the staff at Treasury Solicitors and HM Land Registry involved have operated in a wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt way to help their Freemason brothers Peter Urquhart and is Freemason legal and investment partners end up with thetitle of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart by fraudulent, wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt means.

Assistant to Gloucester HM Land Registrar, Katharine Brothers, HM Land Regsitrar Julie Jenkins and top property dispute London Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang .........................................
that started in 1983 with the Murder of the Late Henry Herbert Butler and the forging of his will by well known Freemason solicitor Simon James Fisher at the time working for Freemason Eggleton Solicitors who were struck off from being solicitors by the Legal Complaints Tribunal, who then handed their legal files to Madge Lloyd Gibson, who knowing the will was a forgery presented the false will to the Probate Office for as fraudulent Grant of Probate to be issued, all with the long term aim of defrauding the Later Herbert Henry Butler and his only child, Valerie Ann Butler of their legal right to ownership of their 25 acres and farm house known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and have Haywicks farm fraudulently transferred into two of the fraud conspirators names Peter Leslie Urquhart and his wife Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, who had been legal clients of Eggletons solicitors and Madge Lloyd Gibson for over 30 years, who planned to hold the property as a front for all the other Freemason solicitors and ex-solicitors who are based in the Gloucester area including the Eccleton Family and their family development company Egdon Estates and Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington solicitors who are commonly known as Gloucestershire's Legal Mafia (GLM).
 

                                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Chancery Division                          
                                      Chancery Appeal Ref: CH/2011/0567 and Claim No: HC11C00473
John Carew-Reid                                          Claimant and Apellant
And
Gary Roger Jouai and Ors   Defendants and Respondents
________________________________________________________________________________
Statement of Truth of Andrew May dated 24th May 2012
________________________________________________________________________________
  1. I,  Andrew May, investigator for the INL News Legal and Investigation Team, based at 15 Home Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9JR
  2. I have been authorised to make this statement on behalf of the claimants and appellants in Chancery Appeal Ref: CH/2011/0567 Claim No: HC11C00473
  3. On the evidence the  INL News Legal and Investigation Team, that has been collected and gathered covering the period 1980 t0 2012 there seems no doubt that there has been a serious criminal and civil conspiracy to defraud , conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, , along with serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice,  malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers committed by the following in different ways and levels that have been for the main purpose of helping well know Freemason Peter Leslie Urqhuart and Jacqueline Urquhart their Freemasons legal and business partners defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood of their lawfuls rights to the ownership, equity ad possession of the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE:.
against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others..
  1. It is noted that judges, masters and/or adjudicators have been accused of playing a wrongful part of these civil and criminal wrongs. Please note that in a judicial journal that is fully quoted and referenced in the series of books called The Triumph of Truth ( Who Is Watching The Watchers?) written by Stephen Carew-Reid and published by the Australian Weekend News a subsidiary of the INL News Group, the previous Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, the highest court in Australia which has a similar and/or higher legal standing as Supreme Court in England states:
“If judges and magistrates think the law of contempt of court is there to protect themselves from criticism., then they are ignorant of the law....” Justice Mann for example has ignored the law set and confirmed by Justice Morgan in HC11C00580 whereby Justice Mann has approved the issue of a high court claim by Janice Pritchard  as trustee for Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid when Justice Morgan is fully aware that not only is Janice Pritchard not a qualified lawyer or attorney, but is also  a mentally unwell and unstable woman with no legal knowledge or experience. So Justice Morgan hs set a solid legal precedent in English Law in his rulings in HC11C00580 and Justice Mann can not say he did not have knowledge of this case,  because Justice Mann admitted in court on the 22nd March, 2012  that he had studied HC11C00580,  in detail because he wanted to use this case in support of Justice Mann desperately wanting to find a way of having  a legal excuse to issue orders of a civil restraint order against John Carew-Reid  from being able to issue any further applications and/or claims concerning legal arguments as to the ownership of Haywicks Farm to try and help his Freemasons Brothers Peter Leslie Urquhart and his Freemason legal and business partners to illegally, fraudulently, corruptly and wrongly obtain the title deed of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, because Justice Mann’s sworn oath to Freemasonary is more important to him that his oath to apply to law in a fair, honest and proper way as a judge in the High Court of Justice. That is why all judges, magistrates and adjudicators presiding in any court or hearing have to before they start the hearing openly declare if their a freemason and if they are, and if either of the parties involved in the litigation and/or legal representatives are Freemasons, and/or any of the parties have been involved in publicly or privately campaigning against the wrongful use of the Freemasonary Brothership etc, then they have to immediately resign form hearing the case because of an obvious and potential bias. The court is reminded that the law has to be fair and just but also seen to be fair and just, and when there is the possibility of any possible bias, and/or even the belief of a possible bias, then a judges, magistrates and adjudicators presiding in any court or hearing will have to immediately resign from dealing with the case to keep the law seen to be fair And just in the eyes of the general public.
  1. The full evidence and details of serious criminal and civil conspiracy to defraud , conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, , along with serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice,  malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers committed by the following in different ways and levels that have been for the main purpose of helping well know Freemason Peter Leslie Urqhuart and Jacqueline Urquhart their Freemasons legal and business partners defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood of their lawfuls rights to the ownership, equity ad possession of the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE:.
against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others.., will be made available by the INL News group at a full trial of this action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567
  1. Annexed hereto and marked with the letters  “AM1” is a true copy of a page on the www.awn.bz website that has been published worldwide taken from the www.awn.bz website on the 24th May, 2012. It is my understanding that none of the information on this webpage and other web pages has been disputed by anyone to the webpage publishers and none has even written to the publishers of the webpage to even complain about the statements and information on published worldwide on this web page., even after the INL News Legal and Investigation Team have emailed this information to some of the main conspirators being attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, Katharine Brothers of HM Land Registry, Owen Rhys Acting ad Adjudicator for H Land Registry, Peter Leslie Urquhart, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Justice and others with no objection coming back to say any of them object this information being published on the world internet after been warned that it was to be published on the world internet.
  2.  It is important that Justice Mann or any other judge dealing with any application, judgement, and/or any proposed orders concerning action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 and/or any other court hearing concerning Haywicks Farm before making any judgement or order.
  3. It is noted that there is an application that has been listed in action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 which due to be heard at 10.30 am on the 24th July, 2012 in Court 10 in the Rolls Building, London requesting orders be made that the orders made by Justice Mann in action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 on the 22nd March, 2012 be set aside and/or deemed null and void and of no legal effect and for Justice Mann be removed from dealing with any proposed extended civil restraint order application due to be listed in action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 as ordered by Justice Mann. I  maintain that it is highly inappropriate for the listings office of the High Court of Justice to have listed  proposed extended civil restraint order application inaction HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 as ordered by Justice Mann, prior to the hearing set down for the 24th July, 2012 as aforementioned and state that the hearing listed on the 25th May, 2012 should be vacated and be relisted for hearing at 10/30 am in court 10 in the Rolls Building on the 24th July, 2012.  It is also noted that there are other matters also listed concerning Mr carew-Reid and the INL News Group also listed on the 24th July, 2012 and an attorney will be present to argue and present the claimant’s and appellents case and argument and it would be highly inappropriate, unfair and wrong as well a be a travesty of justice of the hearing set down for the 25th May, 2012 for the issue of a proposed extended civil restraint order application due to be listed in action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 as ordered by Justice Mann, without Mr Carew-Reid having the opportunity to have an attorney present to argue his case, who has been booked to attend the hearing on the 24th July, 2012. So I request that the court vacate the hearing on the 25th May, 2012 and relist it for 10.30am on the 24th July, 2012 in court 10 Rolls building London.
  4. I  believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true.
 
....................................................................
Andrew May       24th May 2012

25th May, 2012

Urgent attention; Susan Papworth (Ms) Assistant Land Registrar,
Guarantee and Litigation Group, Direct line 01733 288919
GTN 7 3557 8619
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk

Please see the below email and attachments sent to Katharine Brothers.

As we now are fully aware and understand that it has been you that has
been helping katharine Brothers to prepare and write all her letters
with many deliberate false and misleading facts and legal concepts we
expect as answer from you direct over these points raised as well as
all the factual and legal issues raised in the statement filed with
the High Court of Justice of Andrew May dated the 24th May, 2012 and
the attachment to that statement which is a copy of the web lage from
www.awn.bz

http://awn.bz/HMLandRegistryCorruption.html

taken from the web on the 24th July, 2012 so it is all in the public domain and these factual and legal points
and issues have to be dealt with and responded to by yourself and HM
Land Registry,

Please also be on notice that you are also going to to may a party of  any future damages claimed in any new legal actions issued against
HM Land Registry and its staff as you are the one that has prepared letters for Katharine Brothers to put her and HM Registry's name to
and sign which you knew at the time were full of false, misleading and fraudulent facts, information and legal arguments and missing material
facts. You have illegally, wrongly, immorally and corruptly advised Katharine Brothers to write letters full and false and misleading facts and legal arguments and also advised Katharine Brothers to allow HM Registry to by pass the determination of High Courts orders and High Court actions that have not yet been fully determined by the courts and had a long way before they were properly determined.

You have personally allowed and being involved with a serious civil and criminal conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to pervert the
course of justice along with other criminal and civil offences committed by yourself and other staff in the HM Land Registry in
Gloucester which are legally described as Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.


War won't serve Australia's cause

Melbourne Age Newspaper_ Date- August 31, 2013 - Julian Assange
http://www.theage.com.au/comment/war-wont-serve-australias-cause-20130830-2swb2.html
 
The horrors witnessed in Damascus last week are a painful reminder of the abuses that take place when the flow of information is shut down. Both the Assad regime and the anti-Assad forces have made Syria a hostile environment for journalists. As a result there is still no clarity about why this toxic chemical release happened.
Going to war is a very serious business with very serious repercussions, and must not be undertaken until the facts are in. Australia's federal election must not be used as a cover for taking our country into war.
The prospect of regime change in Damascus has long appealed to the US. For the Americans to be able to assert effective influence over Syria would serve US geopolitical interests in at least three ways. It would push back the last extended limb of Russian hard power and cement US victory in its long-term cold-war project to isolate Russian influence globally. It would strengthen Israel's hand by removing one of Hezbollah's main sources of support in Lebanon. And it would complete the encirclement of Iran, whose Shiite Islamist government US hawks have long been looking to overthrow.
Advertisement
The only thing holding the US back in its goal of regime change in Syria has been the difficulty in identifying a sufficiently strong and ''reliable'' partner in this endeavour. The Syrian opposition is kaleidoscopic. It includes extremist Sunni militant groups such as al-Nusra, which is affiliated to al-Qaeda, and has been reported to be in possession of sarin gas. As this civil war has progressed, it has increasingly become a Sunni-Shiite proxy war, which threatens to embroil the entire Middle East region, with all the major players aligning themselves with one side or another.
Meanwhile, Syria's traditional No. 1 foe Israel is ever at the ready with its own powerful arsenal of missiles.
In 2011, the Obama administration laid down its ''red line'' for intervention - any use of any chemical weapons. There is no doubt that there was a large-scale toxic chemical release in Damascus last week. And there is no denying the horror this has inflicted on innocents. It remains far from clear, however, who used it, and with what motivation. Was this an authorised deployment of chemical weapons by the Syrian government or something else? In whose strategic interest would such an attack be? The Syrian government, which has gained the upper hand in the conflict in recent months, stands to gain nothing by the use of chemical weapons.
Internal documents from the US intelligence contractor Stratfor, which were released by WikiLeaks, reveal that US-led military intervention in Syria has been on the US military agenda since at least December 2011. The document describes how special operations forces were ''already on the ground'' at that time, and were focused on ''training opposition forces''. The document states: ''They [the Pentagon] don't believe air intervention would happen unless there was enough media attention on a massacre, like the Gaddafi move against Benghazi.''
In May 2012, the English-speaking media fell over themselves to attribute the Houla massacre to the Assad government. WikiLeaks cautioned at that time that the reality might be more complex. We were right. The UN commission of inquiry into the massacre was inconclusive. It also showed that there had been significant misreporting in the Western press, and that semi-autonomous militias were likely responsible for many of the deaths.
In an eerie reminder of the lead-up to the disastrous Iraq war, the US government is once again pre-empting the findings of the UN fact-finding mission, declaring that its mind is already made up and that the Assad government is responsible. And the Australian Labor government, personified by the pro-Washington Bob Carr, is dutifully toeing the line, saying a UN mandate is not necessary for legitimate intervention.
But look again. The humanitarian case is weak. Despite the misleading euphemistic rhetoric of the US ''striking across the bow'', it is a dead certainty that missile strikes will kill innocent civilians. It is no less certain that any kind of intervention will intensify the conflict and create even greater refugee flows. More than 1.2 million refugees have already fled the conflict and these migrations are destabilising the whole region.
We must remember the lessons of Iraq - when Australia was led into war by the US/British war machine masquerading its propaganda as ''intelligence''. Then, as now, we were fed on a diet of fear mongering about chemical weapons. And then, as now, the war machine is pre-empting the fact-finding missions of the UN, rendering its job impossible.
What Australian interests are served by going along with a US-led intervention in Syria? The answer is none. The case for intervention has not been made.
Julian Assange is the editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks and a candidate for the Senate.


Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/comment/war-wont-serve-australias-cause-20130830-2swb2.html#ixzz2dXq4AfFx#
 
  • Federal Election 2013 coverage
  • Have your say on YourView
CNN Video as @CNNVideo

.@tomforemancnn explores Bashar al-Assad's preparation plans as the U.S. continues to contemplate striking #Syria: http://t.co/C2Si6MgXc0

http://inagist.com/all/373565983807397888/

10 simple points to help you understand the Syria conflict

  • by: ANTHONY SHARWOOD
  • From: news.com.au
  • August 27, 2013 4:31PM
  • 45 comments
  • Chemical attack: Warning graphic images
  • Syria: case for intervention
  • Syrian Electronic Army attacks Western media


Read more: http://www.news.com.au/world-news/simple-points-to-help-you-understand-the-syria-conflict/story-fndir2ev-1226705155146#ixzz2dY3MYIdu


http://www.news.com.au/world-news/simple-points-to-help-you-understand-the-syria-conflict/story-fndir2ev-1226705155146

THIS is a complicated war. This is a messy, cruel war where neither side has much regard for civilian casualties.

This war is not black-and-white. You might think it's the brave rebels versus the evil dictatorial regime, and that's part of the story. But it's not all of it. Not by a long way.

Confused about Syria? Us too. But this quick 10-point explainer will help. To help us navigate this tragic conflict, we spoke to two Australians with a unique view on the troubled nation.

We spoke to Dr Rodger Shanahan, former peacekeeper in Syria and non-resident Fellow at the Lowy Institute for International Policy.

And we spoke to Father David Smith, a Sydney Anglican priest who this year travelled to Syria on a humanitarian mission. You can read his blog here at prayersforsyria.com.

1. Syria

A country smaller than the state of Victoria with almost the exact same population as Australia (22.5 million to our 23 million) which borders Turkey, Iraq, Jordan, Israel and Lebanon. Syria has both deserts and fertile areas and is steeped in history dating back to biblical times.

2. The Syrian regime

Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. AFP PHOTO/SANA

Syrian president Bashar al-Assad. AFP PHOTO/SANA Source: AFP

 

The Syrian Civil war is a conflict between its long-serving government and those seeking to boot it out of office. The Assad family has held power in Syria since 1971. First it was Hafez al-Assad, then Bashar al-Assad.

Unlike many regime leaders in the middle east middle, The Assad family is not religiously extreme. They are Alawites - a relatively obscure branch of Islam which is not particularly hard-line. So the people have not been protesting against hard-line Islamists, as happened in other countries which participated in the Arab Spring uprisings.

But people are still angry at their government. As Rodger Shanahan points out, what they're angry about is the failure of long-promised economic and political reforms.

3. The Civil War begins

Rodger Shanahan says the catalyst was the jailing on March 6, 2011, of some children who painted anti-regime graffiti. Some were killed in detention, and this led to public protests which spread around the country - fuelled by the failure of the government to punish the perpetrators.

Another theory says the war started with demonstrations which mirrored those in neighbouring countries, and which soon led to a security crackdown. In April 2011, the Syrian Army fired on demonstrators and the protests became a full-scale armed rebellion.

Window on the world, Syria style. AFP PHOTO/STR

Window on the world, Syria style. AFP PHOTO/STR Source: AFP

 

4. The rebellion grows…

By July 2011, the Free Syrian Army (FSA) had formed. As Dr Shanahan explains, the FSA never existed before that. "Local areas formed their own militias with the aim of toppling the government without any co-ordination or centralised command or control," he says.

"The militias were a combination of local area tribal groups, deserters from the military [who had been conscripted despite holding anti-government beliefs] and disaffected locals."

Then a combination of Jihadists, some from Syria and some from elsewhere, joined the FSA. Some even came from the faraway Caucasus region - where accused Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev originally hailed from.

So in other words, you had genuine Syrian freedom fighters joined by people with their own Islamist agendas. But because the FSA was underarmed and undermanned, they had little choice but to form a loose coalition with these volatile new kids on the revolutionary block.

5. And pretty soon, bad guys on both sides are killing civilians…

There are good and bad people on both sides. (AP Photo/Shaam News Network, SNN)

There are good and bad people on both sides. (AP Photo/Shaam News Network, SNN) Source: AP

 

As Father Dave Smith says, "the way it's been depicted the last couple of years, you get the impression the rebels are Robin Hood and his band of merry men, and that all they want is freedom and justice for all. But that couldn't be further from the truth."

Father Dave illustrates his point with a communication he had with a Syrian woman which he published on his blog. The woman's name is Ghinwa and she wrote by text:

"The situation is very bad now in Latakia province. 7 Alawite villages were massacred. We know about the killing of 136 villagers all killed on sectarian bases. A friend of mind lost 21 member of his relatives.

"All of my friends who were documenting the name and the events of massacres in Latakia against Alawites are now being threatened to be killed by FSA and Al Nusra terrorists … On TV we are shown something different. It is only a propaganda. They're trying to say that Alawites are not being killed or displaced. The truth is being hidden by mass media. .. This is sick… My sister now is very ill … I guess a part of her illness is caused by sadness … we are afraid."

A quick recap. Alawites are the ethnicity of the ruling family. The fact they were allegedly being killed by rebel groups suggests the rebels are not all angels.

6. Civilian casualties

Her bedroom was ruined, but this woman was one of the lucky ones.

Her bedroom was ruined, but this woman was one of the lucky ones. Source: AP

 

"There are accusations of atrocities on both sides," Rodger Shanahan confirms. We should believe some of them, absolutely. There's no accurate confirmation, but it's a nasty horrible civil war with people on both sides getting killed.

Dr Shanahan says there is evidence that opposition car bombs have killed countless civilians in the name of taking out a government target. But there are equally distressing reports that government soldiers executed civilians. Others, shockingly, were executed for taking a moral stance and failing to follow orders to execute civilians.

Like we said, it's a bloody mess. Literally. The death toll in the war is now said to be well over 100,000.

7. The president's wife

 Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his wife Asma al-Assad. AFP PHOTO / Gerard Cerles

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his wife Asma al-Assad. AFP PHOTO / Gerard Cerles Source: Supplied

 

Allow us to break up this tale with a story of the president's wife. Her name is Asma al-Assad and she was raised in Britain by Syrian parents. She's smart, glamorous and she worked as an investment banker before meeting her future husband in Britain in 2000 - just months before he became president.

In March 2011, the American version of Vogue magazine ran a long, glowing profile of Asma al-Assad. Talk about bad timing. The story was soon removed from Vogue's website and the journalist who wrote it tried to cover her tracks by penning a separate story elsewhere entitled "First Lady of Hell".

Even as the Civil war rages, the Assad family remains popular with many middle class Syrians, especially urbanised Sunni Muslims, says Dr Rodger Shanahan. "They still prefer him to the opposition," he says.

8. Refugee hell

No queue-jumping here. AP Photo/Hadi Mizban

No queue-jumping here. AP Photo/Hadi Mizban Source: AP

 

The United Nations estimates that more than 1.5 million refugees have now fled Syria. Father David Smith visited several camps across the border in Lebanon - a country whose population of 4.3 million is bulging with the influx of a total of nearly 2 million Palestinian and Syrian refugees.

"The camps I saw were deeply impressive," Father Dave says. "Every Palestinian family took in two, maybe three Syrian families. These included polygamous families which presented a whole new problem. The wives often lived in separate houses in Syria but now they were not just under the same roof but sleeping on the same floor. The domestic violence and rape problems are enormous. I was deeply impressed with camp and people running it."

9. Chemical weapons

Just who unleashed the chemical weapons attack which killed hundreds of children and other civilians last week - and why? UN weapons inspectors arrived yesterday with a mandate to find that out. And when they do, it will affect what the world does next.

"They have a mandate to say whether a chemical attack occurred but not to apportion blame," Dr Shanahan cautions. "First, they have to establish whether an incident occurred [it is still disputed by some] and at what level the action was authorised. It is plausible that Assad didn't authorise it but a local commander did."

10. What happens next

The world waits. "You would think the way diplomatic manoeuvrings are going that if there is some kind of military strike it would be quite limited," Dr Shanahan says. "It would be punitive, not designed to tip the military balance."

In other words, no Iraq-style invasion or prolonged Western intervention.

And Father Dave's opinion of what comes next? He doesn't know. But he's praying. He speaks of a man he met in Syria who said he's gone "from unemployment to slavery". That's his way of saying the revolution has so far achieved a whole bunch of nothing except bloodshed and dislocation.

"I see the faces of all those beautiful people and I pray," he says.

Continue the conversation @antsharwood @newscomauHQ @GhinwaMaia @fatherdave



Read more: http://www.news.com.au/world-news/simple-points-to-help-you-understand-the-syria-conflict/story-fndir2ev-1226705155146#ixzz2dY3VxjKk


Syria conflict: as it happened

John Kerry, the US secretary of state, has effectively set out the case for missile strikes on Syria, as he says the US cannot stand idly by as the Assad regime uses chemical weapons. The day's developments as they happened.
Paulflynnmp
Paul Flynn Paddy Ashdown & other strutting make-believe Napoleons mourn loss of UK World Policeman role that cost UK £50bn & 623 lives in last 10 years
About one day agovia web
 
Syria conflict: latest
John Kerry on Syria 
By Chris Irvine, Bruno Waterfield and Matthew Holehouse
11:55PM BST 30 Aug 2013
 Kerry: history will judge us if we turn a blind eye
• Obama: US consider 'limited, narrow act'

• BBC Panorama films 'napalm' attack
• Francois Hollande: France is ready to act
• Britons told to avoid Lebanon
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10270342/Syria-conflict-as-it-happened.html
 
 


By Chris Irvine, Bruno Waterfield and Matthew Holehouse
11:55PM BST 30 Aug 2013
Comments2837 Comments
• Kerry: history will judge us if we turn a blind eye
• Obama: US consider 'limited, narrow act'
• BBC Panorama films 'napalm' attack
• Francois Hollande: France is ready to act
• Britons told to avoid Lebanon

Latest

00.00 We are going to wrap up today's live blog for now. For all the developments in Syria, check the Telegraph's world news page.
23.55 Here are all of tomorrow's newspaper front pages, with Syria dominating.
23.50 In tomorrow's paper our US team Peter Foster, Jon Swaine and Raf Sanchez report that the US is planning an attack on Syria with the help of France.
23.30 Here is our wrap of the story of the day: John Kerry says the world must act after Assad's gas attack.

Related Articles

  • The world is not a better place for this country taking a back seat
    30 Aug 2013
  • The finger of blame for the Commons defeat
    30 Aug 2013
23.00 UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has told the five permanent Security Council members that it may be two weeks before for final results are ready of an analysis of samples experts collected at the site of a chemical weapons attack last week in Syria are ready.
22.45 Here's more from the Syrian foreign ministry statement: “What the US administration describes as irrefutable evidence... is nothing but tired legends that the terrorists have been circulating for more than a week, with their share of lies and entirely fabricated stories."
22.40 The White House has released details of the most recent phone call between Mr Obama and Mr Cameron:
The President spoke with Prime Minister Cameron today as part of their continuing consultations on the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons on August 21, which they agree is unacceptable and cannot be tolerated. As always, the United States values the special relationship with the United Kingdom, a close ally and friend. The President and Prime Minister agreed to continue to consult closely on Syria and the broad range of security challenges that our two countries face together.
22.30 Foreign Secretary William Hague tweets:
Twitter Spoke to Secretary Kerry. He thanked me for the UK's steadfast friendship. United on ending #Syria conflict and use of chemical weapons.
22.20 Now some reaction from Syria: the foreign ministry has said that accusations by US Secretary of State John Kerry that it has used chemical weapons were "lies and baseless."
The ministry said in a statement that Mr Kerry's claims were a "desperate attempt" to justify a military strike against Syria.
22.14 The French presidency has put out a new statement saying Francois Hollande and Barack Obama want to send the Syrian regime a "strong message" to condemn the alleged use of chemical weapons.
"Both heads of state agreed that the international community cannot tolerate the use of chemical weapons, that it should hold the Syrian regime accountable for it and send a strong message," the statement said.
21.53 The Sun has declared the death of the "special relationship" on its front page. Funeral to be held in France.
21.40 The Washington Post's London correspondent, Anthony Faiola, has asked how the "Churchillian spirit of a nation suddenly turned into a Chamberlain moment, appeasing a tyrant".
20.55 David Cameron says he has spoken to Barack Obama and that the two leaders had agreed that US-UK cooperation will continue, despite Britain's decision not to support military intervention in Syria.
Mr Cameron said that the US President emphasised his appreciation of the strong friendship between the two leaders and the "strength, durability and depth of the special relationship between our two countries".
"They agreed that their co-operation on international issues would continue in the future and both reiterated their determination to find a political solution to the Syrian conflict by bringing all sides together," a spokesman for Mr Cameron said in a statement.
That doesn't quite take the sting out of John Kerry's snub, though.
20.40 Tayyip Erdogan, the Prime Minister of Turkey, says any intervention in Syria should be aimed at ending Assad's rule. Perhaps unsurprisingly, Syria's rattled northern neighbour wants the US to go further in its use of force than envisaged by Washington, which has said that strikes would not be aimed at regime change but at deterring further use of chemical weapons.
20.18 In case you missed Obama's statement, watch it here on Telegraph TV:
19.38 The US has also released a map accompanying their intelligence assessment.
19.35 In brief remarks at the White House Barack Obama said Assad's use of chemical weapons threatened US interests and endangered its allies such as Israel and Jordan.
Claiming still to have made no final decision on whether to intervene, Mr Obama said he was considering a "limited narrow, act" and would continue consulting with Congress.
"This kind of offence is a challenge to the world," Mr Obama said.
He adds that the attacks threaten US national security.
19.10 If you missed John Kerry's statement, and fancy watching it, here are the best bits, captured by Telegraph TV.
18.51 Barack Obama is reportedly preparing to speak at 2.15pm EDT - or 7.15pm BST, according to ABC News.
18.28 If there was any doubt to how America feels about the Parliamentary vote in Britain last night, then John Kerry's words, or rather lack of them, say it all. Peter Foster says:
The extent of the damage to that relationship was most obvious by the glaring omission of Britain when John Kerry listed the countries prepared to act against Assad. France, by contrast, was referred to as "our oldest ally". Even by the standards of diplomatic code, it was a crushing omission.
18.26 On preparation for the attack, the US intelligence report says that chemical weapons personnel were in the Damascus suburb of Adra from August 18 until August 21.
On August 21, a Syrian regime element prepared for a chemical weapons attack in the Damascus area, including through the utilization of gas masks. Our intelligence sources in the Damascus area did not detect any indications in the days prior to the attack that opposition affiliates were planning to use chemical weapons.
18.24 Some takeaways from the US intelligence report, some oints of which were made by John Kerry.
A preliminary US government assessment determined that1,429 people were killed in the chemical weapons attack, including at least 426 children, though this assessment will certainly evolve as we obtain more information.
We assess with high confidence that the confidence that the Syrian government carried out the chemical weapons attack against opposition elements in the Damascus suburbs on August 21...
We assess that the scenario in which the opposition executed the attack on August 21 is highly unlikely.
18.17 John Kerry has wrapped up where he concludes by saying:
18.05 He says that Assad troops were told in advance of an attack and told to prepare.
He says they saw "rows of dead" lined up.
"We saw rows of children lying side by side, sprawled on a hospital floor, all of them dead from Assad's gas, and surrounded by parents and grandparents that suffered the same fate."
He says he knows at least 1,429 were killed in the attack, including 426 children.
Even the first responders, he says, became victims themselves. "We saw them gasping for air, terrified for their own lives".
"We also know many disturbing details about the aftermath. We know that a senior regime official that knew about the attack confirmed that chemical weapons were used by the regime, reviewed the impact and was afraid they would be discovered.
He says he personally contacted the Syrian foreign minister and said if they have nothing to hide, they should let the UN in immediately. Instead, for four days they shelled the neighbourhood in order to destroy the evidence.
"When the UN inspectors finally gained access, that access was restricted and controlled."
The American intelligence community has "high confidence... this is common sense.. this is evidence. These are facts".
The question, he asks is what "we collectively are going to do about it."
18.00 Kerry says the findings are as "clear as they are compelling". He tells people to read for themselves - evidence they have gathered from "thousands of sources".
He says they have reviewed and rereviewed information regarding the attack, and says they have done so with Iraq in mind. "We will not repeat that moment", he declares.
17.57 John Kerry is finally up.
17.55 British Typhoon fighters will stay in Cyprus despite David Cameron's decision not to join attacks on Syria, because military chiefs believe retaliation against UK bases remains a possibility, according to Ben Farmer, the Telegraph's Defence correspondent.
An RAF source said:
We have no plans to move them. The thinking is we may have said we are not doing anything, but we can't speak for our international partners. Cyprus is where it is and it makes sense to keep them there.
17.44 We are still waiting for John Kerry. The UN meanwhile has said the chemical experts in Syria have completed collecting their samples, but all analysis must be completed before conclusions are drawn.
17.33 More on UN weapons inspectors leaving, it is being widely reported that UN disarmament envoy Angela Kane has left Damascus and is on her way to Istanbul.
17.31 David Blair, meanwhile, has spoken to Telegraph TV via Skype about what action the US might take next on Syria.
17.28 John Kerry, the US secretary of state, is minutes from delivering a statement on Syria.
17.23 Jack Straw, the former Labour Foreign Secretary, has dismissed Lord Ashdown's comments on Syria. Lord Ashdown said he was "ashamed" of what happened in Parliament last night. In an article for the Guardian though, Mr Straw says:
On the six occasions since I entered the Commons in 1979 when it has been asked to endorse UK involvement in military action, there's been an overwhelming, bipartisan majority. What was different last night was not that MPs had suddenly decided pacifism was the answer, that we should retreat from a dangerous world; nor even that the consequences of Iraq had paralysed the capacity of parliamentarians to make decisions.
What was different was, to quote Fraser Nelson, editor of the Spectator, that "Mr Cameron lost due to the simple weakness of his case ... [H]e had no answer... Normally those advocating action offer a plan – of sorts. In Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya the plan was to replace a dictatorship with a democracy – and while you could disagree passionately, you could see what they had in mind. Not this time".
17.00 The BBC are reporting that UN inspectors have now left Syria.
16.50 The chemical weapons attack in Syria demands an international response but Nato will not take part, Anders Fogh Rasmussen the Alliance's secretary general has told Denmark's Politiken newspaper
I see no Nato role in an international reaction to the regime.
16.30 MPs feared they'd create another Iraq disaster. Their actions may give them another Rwanda, argues David Skelton of the Conservative campaign group Renewal.
Many point to the ghost of the Iraq War in order to explain the result. They’re reaching for the wrong analogy. As the Prime Minister pointed out yesterday, the debate was not about use of ground troops, but about making clear that the use of chemical weapons and vile atrocities committed by Assad are entirely unacceptable and should be met with a strong response.
Instead of the spectre of Iraq, hanging over the debate should have been the ghost of our non-intervention in Rwanda and Bosnia.
16.20 The Syrian military is preparing for an imminent attack on the country, moving soldiers and weapons supplies into schools and other public buildings, eyewitnesses tell the Telegraph’s Ruth Sherlock reports in Beirut.
As expectations increase of a US strike at the weekend, the Syrian government is moving weaponry and troops out of the country's military installations, and into urban areas where any attack would cause mass civilian casualties.
"I watched as the military buses moved troops from a security building to a schools," one Syrian businessman from Damascus told the Telegraph, refusing to give his name. "There are tanks and soldiers all over Mezze district of Damascus."
Several other residents of Damascus told the Telegraph, speaking by Skype, that they had witnessed large 'troop movements' around the city. Two local journalists said they had seen 'large military trucks' going into a school in Mezze district.
Whilst troops and weaponry is being moved, prisoners have been left in the military installations that the regime believes could be targets of the strikes, local activists said. They accused the regime of using the detainees as 'human shields', to deter the US from attacking the areas.
"There are several thousand prisoners in a detention centre in Mezze military airport. The regime has removed the troops and the weapons from the base, but has left them there." said an activist in Damascus calling herself Alexia Jade. "Then they move the troops to live among civilians. One way or another they are using all of us as human shields".
16.00 The Washington Post reports that there are "serious reservations" in the overstretched US military over President Obama's plans for a military strike against Syria.
Lt. Gen. Gregory S. Newbold, who served as director of operations for the US joint chiefs of staff during the run-up to the Iraq war, tells the newspaper that many senior American officers share his fears
There’s a broad naivete in the political class about America’s obligations in foreign policy issues, and scary simplicity about the effects that employing American military power can achieve.
15.45 President Obama is holding taks with America's National Security Council.
The meeting is chaired by the president and attended by the vice-president, secretaries of state and defence, the national security adviser along with chairman of the joint chiefs of staff and the director of national intelligence.
15.30 The Telegraph’s Tim Stanley has interviewed John Bolton, former US ambassador to UN who tells him that the Commons vote “won't be much of an impact [on the special relationship] much more a devastating defeat for David Cameron domestically”.
Fairly astonishing that the Coalition would go ahead with a vote on something this critical… that they would allow it to happen.
If the President had been doing his job it would have been easier for Prime Minister Cameron to do his job.
Syria crisis another example of the US leading from behind
15.15 John Kerry, the US Secretary of State, is expected to make a statement on Syria in Washington at 12:30 local time (17:30 BST). The US is due to release a declassified dossier on the Syrian chemical weapons attacks that will claim intercepted communications between "high-level" Syrian officials prove there is "no doubt" that the Assad regime was responsible.
14.58 Nearly 80 per cent of Americans believe that Obama should get congressional approval before using force in Syria, according to a new poll conducted by NBC news. Half think that the US should not intervene in the wake of the attacks.
14.52 Turkey's foreign minister has said intelligence has left no doubt that Assad were responsible for the chemical weapons attack.
14.49 Barack Obama's predecessors have weighed in to offer their views on the pending military action.
George W Bush, who of course dragged America into two wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, has told Fox News that Mr Obama has a "tough choice to make", but:
If he decides to use our military, he'll have the greatest military ever backing him up.
He also says he is "not a fan" of Assad. "He's an ally of Iran, he's made mischief", he adds.
Jimmy Carter, the former Democrat president, meanwhile said unilateral action would be a mistake.
A punitive military response without a UN Security Council mandate or broad support from NATO and the Arab League would be illegal under international law and unlikely to alter the course of the war...
All should seek to leverage the consensus among the entire international community, including Russia and Iran, condemning the use of chemical weapons in Syria and bringing under UN oversight the country's stockpile of such weapons.
It will only harden existing positions and postpone a sorely needed political process to put an end to the catastrophic violence.
Barack Obama with the living former Presidents earlier this year, from left to right, George W Bush, Bill Clinton, George HW Bush and Jimmy Carter
14.30 So with Britain out of the picture, the US is once again at the spearhead of a possible lightning strike. But what does the US have in the region?
Five US destroyers carrying hundreds of cruise missiles between them are believed to be readying launches against Syrian munitions depots and command and control hubs.
The USS Stout has been deployed to join sister ships Mahan, Ramage, Barry and Gravely, a US defence official said on Thursday.
The flagship of the US Sixth Fleet, the USS Mount Whitney, is based in Gaeta, Italy.
US forces are also stationed at air bases in Izmir and Incirlik, Turkey, and long-range bombers could eventually be sent from bases in North America.
Ships attached to the 26th Marine Expeditionary Unit are now in port in the United Arab Emirates, and two aircraft carrier battle groups built around the USS Truman and USS Nimitz are cruising in the northern Indian Ocean.
The only European nation prepared to intervene at this point is France, which has ships and aircraft standing by.
French aircraft can be equipped with Scalp missiles that could reach targets in Syria.
In Djibouti, France has positioned seven Mirage 2000 combat jets and six Rafales are stationed in Abu Dhabi.
Naval assets include frigates, submarines and the aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle, which is based in Toulon, southern France.
Meanwhile, one of Syria's neighbours is Turkey, which has the second biggest NATO ground force after the United States and could play a major role if an intervention extended beyond limited air strikes.
The Turkish army has a total of 510,000 troops and the air force has 354 combat aircraft, essentially US-built F-16s.
Patriot anti-missile batteries have also been positioned in southern Turkey and are manned by troops from the United States, Germany and the Netherlands under a NATO mandate to protect the country from any spillover of the fighting in Syria.
14.19 Labour sources have told the Guardian that when David Cameron found out that Labour would not back the Syria motion, the prime minister told Ed Miliband that "you are letting down America".
Cameron earlier today said that he did not think he would have to apologise to Barack Obama.
14.00 Vladimir Putin currently has no plans for a one-to-one meeting with President Barack Obama at the G20 summit in Russia next week but will greet him and “shake his hand”.
Yury Ushakov, President Putin’s foreign policy adviser, noted “we and the Americans planned a full-scale state visit (by Obama) to Moscow, which, as you know, is not happening”.
That meeting was cancelled earlier this month by the US president after Mr Putin offered asylum to Edward Snowden, the US intelligence defector.
The G20 meeting in St Petersburg next Thursday and Friday will be pretty frosty amid the Syria crisis and in the possible aftermath of US military strikes.
Putin will naturally greet Obama among other leaders, shake his hand and then we will see.
A meeting with Obama is not planned. Whether it will be standing up or in chairs, I do not know.
13.55 Bernard Jenkin, chairman of the Public Administration Select Committee, is in favour of intervention in Syria but told the Telegraph that David Cameron failed to make his case properly. The SIGINT he refers to are the telephone intercepts that the US is expected to release later today.
It is entirely understandable that the House of Commons voted as it did last night.
There was not sufficient preparation of expectations in the Conservative Party for a recall. The case was not well presented.
I got far more intelligence about why Assad was culpable from a friendly journalist than ministers for the JIC assessments.
We know that there is some command SIGINT which has been reported in the newspapers to which the government did not refer. What was this signals intelligence? This really underlines the limitations of trying to inform the HoC of making a decision of this kind on a limited intelligence briefing.
I do not think the legal basis was properly explained. The Attorney General should have made a statement to the House of Commons and cross-examined, so there was no doubt where the Government's legal case lay. Against the background of the legacy of Iraq, it is not suprising the House voted so strongly to reflect public opinion."
Obama's policy was an almost impossible sell - we are going to drop bombs on Syria but we are not going to get involved in the conflict. It is disastrously incoherent.
13.50 A bit later today we're expecting the US to release a declassified dossier on the Syrian chemical weapons attacks that will claim intercepted communications between "high-level" Syrian officials prove there is "no doubt" that the Assad regime was responsible.
13.40 Al Arabiya is reporting that the Syrian regime is moving government offices to schools and universities to seek safe haven in the event of a military attack.
President Bashar al-Assad’s armed forces have also moved their scud missiles and launchers from a military base in northern to Damascus to unidentified regions, said opposition sources.
13.30 Last night’s debate revealed how little faith politicians have in Britain’s intelligence services. Ten years after Iraq, MPs simply do not trust our spies, blogs Matthew Holehouse.
13.25 Senior Russia foreign policy officials are suggesting that the US will launch three days of air strikes against Syria this weekend regardless of Britain’s rejection of military action, the Telegraph's Roland Oliphant reports from Moscow.
Alexei Pushkov, the chairman of the Russian Duma’s International Affairs Committee, said that he believed America still has enough allies, in the form of France, Turkey, Saudi Arabia and some members of the Arab League, to support strikes.
He also insisted that an alleged US demand for UN inspectors to return from Syria by Saturday indicated Washington intended to go ahead with strikes as planned.
The refusal of the British parliament to support David Cameron’s burning desire to become the next Tony Blair is quite a serious blow to the anti-Syrian coalition, and a painful blow to the United States
We also know that Obama is inclined to get strikes out of the way before he leaves for the G20 summit in St. Petersburg [on Sep 5-6]
We’ve heard talk: the military operation will last three days. In this case the Obama administration is sticking to the timetable it set itself.
13.15 David Horovitz, founding editor of The Times of Israel, is not pulling his punches in a comment article headlined, “Perfidious Albion hands murderous Assad a spectacular victory”.
As a consequence of Cameron’s absolutely staggering defeat in the House of Commons on Thursday night, an already hesitant US administration — which has been wobbling for days about how to make plain to Assad that he can’t massacre his people with weapons of mass destruction, but to do so without embroiling the US in another muddy, bloody, unwinnable Middle East conflict — has lost its key ally in the unenviable, vital task of reining in the murderous tendencies of global, and especially Middle Eastern, despots.
In Syria, Assad must be delightedly flabbergasted.
Syrians search under rubble in Idlib to rescue people from houses that were destroyed by a Syrian government warplane (AP)
13.05 Paul Flynn, the Labour MP for Newport West, is unimpressed with Lord Ashdown's argument.
 
13.00 Paddy Ashdown, the former leader of the Liberal Democrats said he is “ashamed” of Britain’s decision not to take action following the chemical weapons attack in Syria which saw hundreds killed and thousands more injured.
12.45 Is it or isn’t it? There is Facebook post out there purporting to be written by Hafez al-Assad, the 11-year-old son of the Syrian president.
As the New York Times notes “it is impossible to confirm whether the Facebook account does, in fact, belong to the son” but it is “liked or commented on by several people who appear to be the children and grandchildren of other senior members of Mr. Assad’s government”.
So it is either “a glimpse into the defiant worldview of the Syrian elite” – or it ain’t.
Here is an extract of the post.
12 hours we waited… 48 hours they said, we're waiting… I just want them to attack sooo much, because I want them to make this huge mistake of beginning something that they don't know the end of it, just like Hezbollah defeated Israel and the Nato and by what? What did Hezbollah have back then? Some street fighters and some small rockets and a pile of guns, but they had belief, In theirselves and in their country and that's exactly what's gonna happen to America if it chooses invasion because they don't know our land like we do, no one does, victory is ours in the end no matter how much time it takes
Syria forever and everr
12.35 AFP reports that te head of the Western-backed Syrian opposition says the British parliament's failure to endorse military action in Syria isn't enough to hold back strikes by other allies.
Ahmad al-Jarba said on France-Inter radio on Friday that he wasn't surprised by the vote that effectively removes Britain from a coalition of Western allies looking to punish Bashar Assad with military strikes for his regime's alleged responsibility in an apparent chemical attack.
Al-Jarba said that strikes contemplated by the United States, France, and, originally, Britain are a moral responsibility that can level the playing field militarily.
He said that "strikes can paralyze a large part of the regime and raise morale" within the opposition.
As for Britain's vote, he said it wouldn't stop allies of the Syrian people "from ending injustice."
12.25 Peter Dominiczak, Telegraph Political Correspondent has more on what Mr Cameron was saying.
Asked whether he felt that Mr Miliband had been “dishonourable” Mr Cameron said:
It’s a matter for him to defend the way he behaved and his conduct. Look, my only regret is that it wasn’t possible to build a consensus of all parties. I worked hard to try to do that by making clear how we would go to the UN, listen to the inspectors, hold a second vote. But in the end Opposition leaders have to make choices just as Prime Ministers make choices. I made my choice about how to handle this issue doing the right thing in the right way, learning the lessons of the past but I regret it wasn’t possible to have that consensus in the House. The real issue is the House of Commons spoke and the Government will listen.
He also said that Justine Greening, the International Development Secretary, and Mark Simmonds, a foreign office minister, had apologised to him for failing to vote because they did not hear the division bell sounding in Parliament. He said the Whips “did do a good job” despite not convincing so many backbenchers to back the Government.
As for the two ministers who missed the vote this was a technical issue. They had made it for the first vote. They were in a room in the House of Commons where they didn’t hear the division bell, they missed the vote. They’ve apologised profoundly. I’ve accepted that apology but it wouldn’t have changed the result.
David Cameron was forced to abandon plans for Britain to participate in military strikes against Syria after suffering an unprecedented Parliamentary defeat (PA/Reuters)
12.15 Jeevan Vasagar, the Telegraph’s man in Berlin reports that Germany has no plans to participate in a military strike against Syria.
In an interview with the "Neue Osnabrücker Zeitung”, to be published tomorrow, Guido Westerwelle the German foreign minister, said Germany’s participation has “neither been sought nor are we considering it.”
Following a ruling by its constitutional court, Germany can only deploy its armed forces in operations – including overseas deployments - that are under the scope of Nato or the UN, and with the explicit consent of the Bundestag.
“We urge the United Nations Security Council to find a common stance,” he said, calling for the work of UN inspectors to be completed as quickly as possible.
Government spokesman Steffen Seibert told reporters in Berlin on Friday that "we haven't considered any German military participation and still aren't doing so."
12.00 There's more from the Prime Minister on the Commons defeat last night.
I was faced with three things I wanted to do right and do in the right way.
First of all, to condemn absolutely and respond properly to an appalling war crime that took place in Syria.
Secondly, to work with our strongest and most important ally who had made a request for British help.
Thirdly, to act as a democrat, to act in a different way to previous prime ministers and properly consult Parliament.
I wanted to do all those three things. Obviously politics is difficult - that involved going to Parliament, making an argument in a strong and principled way but then listening to Parliament.
I think the American public, the American people and President Obama will understand.
i haven't spoken to him since the debate and the vote but I would expect to speak to him over the next day or so. I don't think it's a question of having to apologise.
11.50 David Cameron, the Prime Minister, has been speaking in Downing Street about the aftermath of the Commons vote.
I think it's important we have a robust response to the use of chemical weapons and there are a series of things we will continue to do.
We will continue to take a case to the United Nations, we will continue to work in all the organisations we are members of - whether the EU, or Nato, or the G8 or the G20 - to condemn what's happened in Syria.
It's important we uphold the international taboo on the use of chemical weapons.
But one thing that was proposed, the potential - only after another vote - involvement of the British military in any action, that won't be happening.
That won't be happening because the British Parliament, reflecting the great scepticism of the British people about any involvement in the Middle East, and I understand that, that part of it won't be going ahead.
11.45 More from Roland Oliphant in Moscow where a Russian military official, the former commander of Russia's air defence forces, is quoted by Interfax saying Syria has about 1000 missile units able to respond to Western air strikes.
Syrian air defences are capable of an adequate response to strikes by the United States and its allies in the anti-Syrian coalition in the even of war. Damascus today has about a thousand units of anti-aircraft rocket systems, and more than 5000 anti aircraft artillery systems of various types.
The official did not rule out the possibility that Syria's arsenal already includes S-300 missiles, which could pose a serious threat to a western air campaign.
If Russia did not deliver them, Belarus or China could have done it without publicity in 2010 or 2011.
11.28 Back to the reality of the cvil war in Syria. Footage has emerged which reportedly shows the aftermath of an incendiary bomb being dropped on a school playground in northern Syria, leaving children with napalm-like burns over their bodies.
(Youtube)
11.20 Russia has welcomed the British parliament's rejection of military action against the Syrian regime.
Yury Ushakov, President Vladimir Putin's chief foreign policy aide, has been briefing the press.
This reflects the opinion of the majority of British and Europeans. It seems to me that people are starting to understand how dangerous such scenarios are.
Russia is working actively to avoid the use of force in Syria,” Presidential aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters.
I would not like us to find ourselves in a situation where one country or a group of countries take it upon themselves to pass judgement and impose their own sentence
Roland Oliphant reports form Moscow for the Telegraph.
It is generally accepted here that Russia's UN Security Council veto would mean nothing in the face of consolidated western support for intervention, so the British vote is in an unexpected victory for Russia's position.
11.00 Matthew Holehouse reports on the scale of the rebellion by Tory MPs. Thirty voted against the Government. Another 33 failed to show up. Guido has the full list.
Among the no shows were some rising stars: Adam Afriyie, Priti Patel, David Gauke at the Treasury, Charlotte Leslie, Jesse Norman from the PM's policy unit, and Rory Stewart - who worked in Iraq and is highly knowledgeable about the Middle East and who would have been expected to contribute last night. And most striking of all - Justine Greening, the Development Secretary, and her deputy Alan Duncan. Greening has a seat on the National Security Council which called for military action in the first instance. There's a reshuffle around the corner.
So it amounts to a crisis of discipline in the Tory party - these are not the usual suspects who have been sore about the Coalition, have little prospects of promotion and giving Cameron a hard time as a result. Was it that they simply couldn't tear themselves from their sunloungers for a vote they assumed the Government was going to win?
10.45 The New York Daily News is shocked by the Commons vote. Britain is now in the German camp and the French, once decried as "surrender monkeys" over Iraq are stepping up to the plate.
President Obama's attempts to form a coalition of nations willing to attack Syria appear to be splintering.
The biggest blow was dealt by the normally reliable Brits, whose Parliament stunned Obama on Thursday by voting down Prime Minister David Cameron’s proposal to join the attack on Bashar Assad’s government.
With Germany already saying no, the President was left with France, whose president, Francois Hollande, said its troops “have been put in a position to respond."
President Hollande flies the flag (Reuters)
10.30 Asked by Le Monde about the Commons vote on Syria strike, President Hollande said he would be stepping into the breach.
Each country is sovereign to participate or not in the operation. This applies to the United Kingdom and for France. I will today have an in-depth exchange with Barack Obama.
If the Security Council is unable to act , a coalition will form. It should be as broad as possible. It will rely on the Arab League. It will have the support of the Europeans. But there are only a few countries that have the capacity to impose a sanction by the appropriate means. France is one. She is ready. She will decide her position closely with her allies.
10.20 The French president has told Le Monde today that military strikes by the US and France could begin on Wednesday – without Britain. Bonjour à la relation spéciale.
Francois Hollande tells the newspaper that he will to go ahead with plans to strike Syria despite the vote blocking military action in the British parliament.
The chemical massacre of Damascus cannot and must not remain unpunished.
10.10 Reuters is also reporting on Mr Obama’s troubles with Congress and the “patchy relationship” Susan Rice, his national security adviser has with American legislators.
She was pilloried by opposition Republicans for saying that a September 2012 attack on a US diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, was the work of a spontaneous crowd rather than Islamist militants. Critics charged it was part of an attempt to protect Obama during his re-election campaign, which the White House vigorously disputed.
10.05 The White House's push to win Congressional support for a military strike on Syria is meeting resistance because of bitterness over President Obama’s to bypass Capitol Hill when the US intervened in Libya two years ago.
The Cable blog reports on the uphill struggle.
With the prospect of an imminent US military intervention into Syria looming, 140 members of Congress, including 21 Democrats, signed onto a letter demanding that the White House seek formal Congressional approval before using force there. Failing to do so, they say, would be unconstitutional.
10.00 The British vote against military action could prove contagious and give President Obama problems in the Republican US Congress.
Representative Howard (Buck) McKeon, Republican chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, said Mr Obama needed to convince both Congress and a “war weary” country.
If he doesn’t, I think he could have a real problem with the Congress and the American public. He’s got a big sell. It’s a very tough situation with no good options.
More US reaction to the Commons vote here
09.50 David Blair, the Telegraph's Chief Foreign Correspondent, reports from Lebanon on the latest sign that military strikes against Syria are imminent.
Here in Beirut, the Foreign Office has issued a travel warning telling Britons to stay out of Lebanon except on "essential business". The border with Syria is off-limits entirely. This is another sign that US military action against Syria is probably imminent. The Foreign Office fears a possible backlash against Westerners in Lebanon. One point might be worth highlighting: the fact that Britain will not join any strike on Syria has evidently not reduced the possible threat to British citizens. If anyone thought we might be safer if we stayed out of US campaigns in the Middle East; well, today's travel warning suggests you should think again.
09.40 The bookies at William Hill have cut the odds for David Cameron no longer being leader of the Conservative Party when the next general election takes place.
Odds are from 5/1 to 3/1 following the Government’s defeat in parliament over military action in Syria last night.
09.35 George Osborne, the Chancellor, has said that there needs to be "national soul-searching" over Britain's role in the world following the Commons defeat.
I think there will be a national soul-searching about our role in the world and whether Britain wants to play a big part in upholding the international system, be that big, open and trading nation that I like us to be, or whether we turn our back on that.
I understand the deep scepticism that many of my colleagues in Parliament, many members of the public, have about British military involvement in Syria. I hope this doesn't become a moment where we turn our back on all of the world's problems.
09.32 The head of the Syrian opposition says that Parliament's failure to endorse military action in Syria will not be enough to hold back strikes by other allies.
Ahmad al-Jarba said on France-Inter radio said that strikes contemplated by the United States, France, and, originally, Britain are a moral responsibility that can level the playing field militarily.
"This won't (stop) Syria's allies from ending injustice," he said, regarding Britain's vote.
09.30 Dozens of Conservative MPs openly defied Mr Cameron to criticise his plans for military action, siding with Ed Miliband.
In a bid to quell the growing rebellion, writes The Telegraph's Peter Dominiczak, Mr Cameron had at lunchtime attempted to persuade his MPs to back him by holding a meeting with backbenchers in Parliament.
Sources close to the Prime Minister claimed that MPs left the meeting satisfied and were prepared to support the Government.
However, as MPs debated the Government motion in the Commons it became clear that a large number of backbenchers were preparing to flout Mr Cameron’s authority.
This morning's Telegraph View says that the Government defeat leaves British policy on Syria and Mr Cameron's own leadership mired in the deepest uncertainty.
The Iraq war scarred the reputation of one prime minister – and now it has poisoned the authority of another. Make no mistake. David Cameron was not defeated yesterday by Ed Miliband: not only did Labour’s amendment go down, but their respective performances made it clearer than ever that the incumbent is palpably better suited to his station than the pretender. Rather, Mr Cameron confronted the legacy of Iraq head-on, attempting to persuade the country, as he said in his peroration, that “we must not let the spectre of previous mistakes paralyse our ability to stand up for what is right”. For good or ill, he failed.
09.25 The morning after the night before. David Cameron may be waking up with a massive political and diplomatic headache, and Barack Obama's "coalition of the willing" has suffered a huge blow.
Mr Cameron has been forced to drop plans for Britain to participate in military strikes against Syria following a humiliating Parliamentary defeat of only 13 votes. Britain's summary of intelligence was not enough to convince 285 MPs it seems.
After it is all said and done, Mr Obama is facing the prospect of effectively going it alone.
Chuck Hagel, the US Secretary of Defence, says America would respect the British decision, but press on with building an alliance against Bashar al-Assad's regime. Likewise, the State Department says that the US "make[s] our own decisions and our own timeline".
Demonstrators gather for a rally against a possible US attack on Syria in front of the White House in Washington
09.20 BST London, 11.20 EEST Damascus, 04.20 EDT Washington Good morning and welcome to our live rolling coverage of the Syria conflict.
Syria conflict and Commons vote: at it happened
Syria: August 28 as it happened




Haywicks Farm was to be used as a film set for a new film
that is being written by the INL News Screen Play writer called
                                                     "Fraud and Murder in Haywicks Lane"
staring:
against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice.


The concept of the names used in the film is based on the way the series of books the Triumph of Truth (Who is watching The Watchers?) written by Stephen Carew-Reid and published by the Australian Weekend News a subsidiary of the INL News Group, have been written in that the real name of those mentioned in the books are used to expose the guilty. So the real names of those involved of the fraud and murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the conspiracy to defraud his only child Valerie Ann Butler of her lawful rights to Haywicks Farm will be used in the film to expose the guilty. The film as the books are based on the truth so any attempt to sue for civil or criminal defamation will be vigorously defended by the INL News Group based on the fact the information is the truth and it is in the public interest to show the world of the wrongful actions of those involved in the fraud and murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the conspiracy to defraud his only child Valerie Ann Butler of her lawful rights to Haywicks Far, which includes the wrongful way the High Court of Justice and the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and the masters, clerks, adjudicators, judges  and the staff at Treasury Solicitors and HM Land Registry involved have operated in a wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt way to help their Freemason brothers Peter Urquhart and is Freemason legal and investment partners end up with thetitle of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart by fraudulent, wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt means.

Assistant to Gloucester HM Land Registrar, Katharine Brothers, HM Land Regsitrar Julie Jenkins and top property dispute London Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang .........................................
that started in 1983 with the Murder of the Late Henry Herbert Butler and the forging of his will by well known Freemason solicitor Simon James Fisher at the time working for Freemason Eggleton Solicitors who were struck off from being solicitors by the Legal Complaints Tribunal, who then handed their legal files to Madge Lloyd Gibson, who knowing the will was a forgery presented the false will to the Probate Office for as fraudulent Grant of Probate to be issued, all with the long term aim of defrauding the Later Herbert Henry Butler and his only child, Valerie Ann Butler of their legal right to ownership of their 25 acres and farm house known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and have Haywicks farm fraudulently transferred into two of the fraud conspirators names Peter Leslie Urquhart and his wife Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, who had been legal clients of Eggletons solicitors and Madge Lloyd Gibson for over 30 years, who planned to hold the property as a front for all the other Freemason solicitors and ex-solicitors who are based in the Gloucester area including the Eccleton Family and their family development company Egdon Estates and Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington solicitors who are commonly known as Gloucestershire's Legal Mafia (GLM).
 

                                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Chancery Division                          
                                      Chancery Appeal Ref: CH/2011/0567 and Claim No: HC11C00473
John Carew-Reid                                          Claimant and Apellant
And
Gary Roger Jouai and Ors   Defendants and Respondents
________________________________________________________________________________
Statement of Truth of Andrew May dated 24th May 2012
________________________________________________________________________________
  1. I,  Andrew May, investigator for the INL News Legal and Investigation Team, based at 15 Home Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9JR
  2. I have been authorised to make this statement on behalf of the claimants and appellants in Chancery Appeal Ref: CH/2011/0567 Claim No: HC11C00473
  3. On the evidence the  INL News Legal and Investigation Team, that has been collected and gathered covering the period 1980 t0 2012 there seems no doubt that there has been a serious criminal and civil conspiracy to defraud , conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, , along with serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice,  malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers committed by the following in different ways and levels that have been for the main purpose of helping well know Freemason Peter Leslie Urqhuart and Jacqueline Urquhart their Freemasons legal and business partners defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood of their lawfuls rights to the ownership, equity ad possession of the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE:.
against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others..
  1. It is noted that judges, masters and/or adjudicators have been accused of playing a wrongful part of these civil and criminal wrongs. Please note that in a judicial journal that is fully quoted and referenced in the series of books called The Triumph of Truth ( Who Is Watching The Watchers?) written by Stephen Carew-Reid and published by the Australian Weekend News a subsidiary of the INL News Group, the previous Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia, the highest court in Australia which has a similar and/or higher legal standing as Supreme Court in England states:
“If judges and magistrates think the law of contempt of court is there to protect themselves from criticism., then they are ignorant of the law....” Justice Mann for example has ignored the law set and confirmed by Justice Morgan in HC11C00580 whereby Justice Mann has approved the issue of a high court claim by Janice Pritchard  as trustee for Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid when Justice Morgan is fully aware that not only is Janice Pritchard not a qualified lawyer or attorney, but is also  a mentally unwell and unstable woman with no legal knowledge or experience. So Justice Morgan hs set a solid legal precedent in English Law in his rulings in HC11C00580 and Justice Mann can not say he did not have knowledge of this case,  because Justice Mann admitted in court on the 22nd March, 2012  that he had studied HC11C00580,  in detail because he wanted to use this case in support of Justice Mann desperately wanting to find a way of having  a legal excuse to issue orders of a civil restraint order against John Carew-Reid  from being able to issue any further applications and/or claims concerning legal arguments as to the ownership of Haywicks Farm to try and help his Freemasons Brothers Peter Leslie Urquhart and his Freemason legal and business partners to illegally, fraudulently, corruptly and wrongly obtain the title deed of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, because Justice Mann’s sworn oath to Freemasonary is more important to him that his oath to apply to law in a fair, honest and proper way as a judge in the High Court of Justice. That is why all judges, magistrates and adjudicators presiding in any court or hearing have to before they start the hearing openly declare if their a freemason and if they are, and if either of the parties involved in the litigation and/or legal representatives are Freemasons, and/or any of the parties have been involved in publicly or privately campaigning against the wrongful use of the Freemasonary Brothership etc, then they have to immediately resign form hearing the case because of an obvious and potential bias. The court is reminded that the law has to be fair and just but also seen to be fair and just, and when there is the possibility of any possible bias, and/or even the belief of a possible bias, then a judges, magistrates and adjudicators presiding in any court or hearing will have to immediately resign from dealing with the case to keep the law seen to be fair And just in the eyes of the general public.
  1. The full evidence and details of serious criminal and civil conspiracy to defraud , conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, , along with serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice,  malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers committed by the following in different ways and levels that have been for the main purpose of helping well know Freemason Peter Leslie Urqhuart and Jacqueline Urquhart their Freemasons legal and business partners defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood of their lawfuls rights to the ownership, equity ad possession of the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE:.
against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others.., will be made available by the INL News group at a full trial of this action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567
  1. Annexed hereto and marked with the letters  “AM1” is a true copy of a page on the www.awn.bz website that has been published worldwide taken from the www.awn.bz website on the 24th May, 2012. It is my understanding that none of the information on this webpage and other web pages has been disputed by anyone to the webpage publishers and none has even written to the publishers of the webpage to even complain about the statements and information on published worldwide on this web page., even after the INL News Legal and Investigation Team have emailed this information to some of the main conspirators being attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, Katharine Brothers of HM Land Registry, Owen Rhys Acting ad Adjudicator for H Land Registry, Peter Leslie Urquhart, the Chief Justice of the High Court of Justice and others with no objection coming back to say any of them object this information being published on the world internet after been warned that it was to be published on the world internet.
  2.  It is important that Justice Mann or any other judge dealing with any application, judgement, and/or any proposed orders concerning action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 and/or any other court hearing concerning Haywicks Farm before making any judgement or order.
  3. It is noted that there is an application that has been listed in action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 which due to be heard at 10.30 am on the 24th July, 2012 in Court 10 in the Rolls Building, London requesting orders be made that the orders made by Justice Mann in action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 on the 22nd March, 2012 be set aside and/or deemed null and void and of no legal effect and for Justice Mann be removed from dealing with any proposed extended civil restraint order application due to be listed in action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 as ordered by Justice Mann. I  maintain that it is highly inappropriate for the listings office of the High Court of Justice to have listed  proposed extended civil restraint order application inaction HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 as ordered by Justice Mann, prior to the hearing set down for the 24th July, 2012 as aforementioned and state that the hearing listed on the 25th May, 2012 should be vacated and be relisted for hearing at 10/30 am in court 10 in the Rolls Building on the 24th July, 2012.  It is also noted that there are other matters also listed concerning Mr carew-Reid and the INL News Group also listed on the 24th July, 2012 and an attorney will be present to argue and present the claimant’s and appellents case and argument and it would be highly inappropriate, unfair and wrong as well a be a travesty of justice of the hearing set down for the 25th May, 2012 for the issue of a proposed extended civil restraint order application due to be listed in action HC11C004673 and/or a full appeal of this appeal CH/2011/0567 as ordered by Justice Mann, without Mr Carew-Reid having the opportunity to have an attorney present to argue his case, who has been booked to attend the hearing on the 24th July, 2012. So I request that the court vacate the hearing on the 25th May, 2012 and relist it for 10.30am on the 24th July, 2012 in court 10 Rolls building London.
  4. I  believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true.
 
....................................................................
Andrew May       24th May 2012

25th May, 2012

Urgent attention; Susan Papworth (Ms) Assistant Land Registrar,
Guarantee and Litigation Group, Direct line 01733 288919
GTN 7 3557 8619
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk

Please see the below email and attachments sent to Katharine Brothers.

As we now are fully aware and understand that it has been you that has
been helping katharine Brothers to prepare and write all her letters
with many deliberate false and misleading facts and legal concepts we
expect as answer from you direct over these points raised as well as
all the factual and legal issues raised in the statement filed with
the High Court of Justice of Andrew May dated the 24th May, 2012 and
the attachment to that statement which is a copy of the web lage from
www.awn.bz

http://awn.bz/HMLandRegistryCorruption.html

taken from the web on the 24th July, 2012 so it is all in the public domain and these factual and legal points
and issues have to be dealt with and responded to by yourself and HM
Land Registry,

Please also be on notice that you are also going to to may a party of  any future damages claimed in any new legal actions issued against
HM Land Registry and its staff as you are the one that has prepared letters for Katharine Brothers to put her and HM Registry's name to
and sign which you knew at the time were full of false, misleading and fraudulent facts, information and legal arguments and missing material
facts. You have illegally, wrongly, immorally and corruptly advised Katharine Brothers to write letters full and false and misleading facts and legal arguments and also advised Katharine Brothers to allow HM Registry to by pass the determination of High Courts orders and High Court actions that have not yet been fully determined by the courts and had a long way before they were properly determined.

You have personally allowed and being involved with a serious civil and criminal conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to pervert the
course of justice along with other criminal and civil offences committed by yourself and other staff in the HM Land Registry in
Gloucester which are legally described as Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.

 We understand that you claim to be a qualified lawyer, but from everything we have seen so far your legal advice to Katharine Brothers in HM Land Registry Katharine Brothers, HM Land Registry staff if landing yourself and  them all.into that much civil and criminal issues and encouraging everyone at HM Land Registry to continue to commit civil and criminal wrongs which will all end up on serious criminal charges as well as HM Land Registry and yourselves being personally jointly and severally liable for hundreds of millions in damages

Good luck for the future.. you will need all the luck you can get from now on..

Yours Kindly

Valerie Ann Butler

for and on behalf of myself and

Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood

Rightful owners of Haywicks Farm


25th May 2012


--------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Papworth, Sue <Sue.Papworth@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:04 PM
Subject: Haywicks Farm: GR351346
To: valerieannbutler@gmail.com

from:  "Papworth, Sue" <Sue.Papworth@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>

to: valerieannbutler@gmail.com

date:  Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:04 PM

subject: Haywicks Farm: GR351346


Dear Madam

I refer to your various emails relating to Haywicks Farm.  This matter
is now being dealt with by me, as a lawyer in the Land Registry’s
Guarantee and Litigation Group. Any emails letters or documents sent to Land Registry Gloucester office will simply beforwarded to me. Land Registry does not accept that you have any claim against it.  Any proceedings thatyou commence will be defended robustly by Land
Registry and costs will be sought in the event of Land Registry being successful.

Yours faithfully

Susan Papworth (Ms) Assistant Land Registrar,
Guarantee and Litigation Group, Direct line 01733 288919
GTN 7 3557 8619
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk


If you have received this e-mail and it was not intended for you, please let us know, and then delete it. Please treat our communications in confidence, as you would expect us to treat yours. Land Registry checks all mail and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.

Dear Madam

Further to my earlier email I clarify, for the sake of completeness, that not only does Land Registry refute that you have any grounds for
making a claim against Land Registry, but also that any allegations of personal wrongdoing or misfeasance made against Katharine Brothers, Julie Jenkins or any other member of Land Registry in connection with this matter are entirely refuted, and will be defended robustly should they form the basis of any litigation.

Yours faithfully

Susan Papworth (Ms), Assistant Land Registrar, Guarantee and Litigation Group, Direct line 01733 288919
GTN 7 3557 8619
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk


If you have received this e-mail and it was not intended for you, please let us know, and then delete it. Please treat our
communications in confidence, as you would expect us to treat yours. Land Registry checks all mail and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any attachments at your own risk. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored
and/or recorded for legal purposes.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:46 AM
Subject: Fwd: Damages for Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Reg & Ors
Your Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, Marie-Claire
Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William Moffett
(Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,
p.urquhart29@btinternet.com, "Gifford, Suzanne"
<suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>

24th May 2012

Urgent Attention:
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
  "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"Adjudicator HM" <alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
CC:"Peter Urquhart" <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>,
"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
24th  May, 2012

CC: Chief Justice, High Court of Justice
Andrew Morrett ace of his clerk: "Gifford, Suzanne"
<suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,

TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref N/A
Our ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346. Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick

Re: One Billion damages claimed by the INL News Group and its shareholders, partners and financiers, Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen
Carew-Reid, Thomas Allwood,  against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge
Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attroney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry
lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire
Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys
Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks
Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion
and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney
and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of
Justice which will no doubt lead to the removal of her license to practice as a barrister in the United Kingdom.

Please see attached letter from the INL News Legal and Investigation Team making it clear that myself, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas
Allwood are putting  HM Land Registry on clear notice are claiming in excess of 20 million pounds damages which are increasing at 30,000
pounds a day HM Land Registry wrongly keep the title deed of Haywicks Farm in the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urqhuart and do
not obey the orders of Justice Iyer made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 to order that HM Land Registry register the title of Haywicks
Farm in the name of Valerie Ann Butler. Also the HM Land Registry are on notice that they must allow the registration of the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged by Stephen Carew-Reid on the 17th May, 2012 against Haywicks Farm to protect the interests
and/or ownership in Haywicks Farm of Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Butler and Thomas Allwood and it would be illegal, wrongful and/or
corrupt for them not to do so. HM Land Registry are well aware from the court order of Justice Iyer made the 29th December, 2012 as
attached states that I ( Valerie Ann Butler) and the rightful sole administrator and executor of the estate of my Late father Herbert
Henry Butler and the owner of my Late Fathers interests in Haywicks Farm which can be now divided into two sections:
(a) The part right to possession and ownership of Haywicks Farm that Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart claim to have purchased for
660,000 pounds
(b) the part right to possession and ownership that is set out in the overage agreement and restriction that has been placed over the title
of Haywicks Farm by the said Gary Roger Jouai.

We appreciate the HM Land Registry and the Urquharts are arguing that the UN1 and RX1 notices lodged by Stephen Carew-Reid over part
(a)should not be allowed to be registered, which we do not agree is correct, however in the light of the order made by Justice Iyer on the
29th December, 2011 in 1MA3045 as attached, that there can be no dispute or doubt that the UN1 and RX1 Notices from HM Land Registry
and Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart are rightfully lodged to protect my and my two partners, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood
ownership and interests in Haywicks Farm that relates to part
 (b) being the part right to possession and ownership that is set out in the overage agreement and restriction that has been placed over the title of Haywicks Farm by the said Gary Roger Jouai.

Please also see attached my updated medical certificate showing I am unfit to travel to the UK until August, 2012 to attend court hearing
regarding Haywicks Farm.

Yours kindly

Valerie Ann Butler
Stephen Carew-Reid, Thomas Allwood

CC: Chief Justice, High Court of Justice
Andrew Morrett ace of his clerk:
"Gifford, Suzanne" <suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <news@inlnews.com>
Date: Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:21 AM
Subject: RE: Damages for Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Reg & Ors Your
Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, Katharine Brothers
<Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office"
<gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, Adjudicator HM
<alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, Marie-Claire Bleasdale
<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, Peter Urquhart
<urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>, "Gifford, Suzanne"
<suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: stephen carew-reid <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>, David Rosen
<davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, news@inlnews.com, Valerie Butler
<valerieannbutler@gmail.com>



24th May, 2012
From:  David Rosen, INL News Groups Legal and Investigative Team
Email: "David Rosen" news@inlnews.com

Urgent Attention:
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
  "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"Adjudicator HM" <alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
CC:"Peter Urquhart" <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>,
"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
24th  May, 2012

CC: Chief Justice, High Court of Justice
Andrew Morrett ace of his clerk: "Gifford, Suzanne"
<suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,

TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

Re: One Billion damages claimed by the INL News Group and its shareholders, partners and financiers, Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen
Carew-Reid, Thomas Allwood,  against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge
Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attroney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry
lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys
Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks
Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion
and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney
and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of
Justice which will no doubt lead to the removal of her license to practice as a barrister in the United Kingdom.

Please see attached letter

24th May, 2012
From:  David Rosen, INL News Groups Legal and Investigative Team
Email: "David Rosen" news@inlnews.com

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Damages for Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Reg & Ors Your Ref:
N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
From: <news@inlnews.com>
Date: Thu, May 24, 2012 1:00 am
To: "Valerie Butler" <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, "Katharine Brothers"
<Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office"
<gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "Adjudicator HM"
<alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, "Marie-Claire Bleasdale"
<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "Peter Urquhart"
<urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>
Cc: "stephen carew-reid" <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>, "David Rosen"

<davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>

24th May, 2012
From:  David Rosen, INL News Groups Legal and Investigative Team
Email: "David Rosen" news@inlnews.com#

Urgent Attention:
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
  "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"Adjudicator HM" <alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
CC:"Peter Urquhart" <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>,
"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
24th  May, 2012

TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

Re: One Billion damages claimed by the INL News Group and its shareholders, partners and financiers, Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen
Carew-Reid, Thomas Allwood,  against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge
Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attroney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry
lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire
Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys
Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks
Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion
and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney
and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of
Justice which will no doubt lead to the removal of her license to practice as a barrister in the United Kingdom.

You are well aware of the details and particulars of the serious civil and criminal wrongs you all have been involved with a conspiracy to
pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale
breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and
misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice.

Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood have obviously suffered direct damages for the loss of the potential value
of the property known as Haywicks Farm as a result of your criminal and civil wrongs committed against them, which is estimated over 20
million pounds sterling because of the long term potential development of the property. However there is another substantial loss because
Haywicks Farm was ot be used as a film set for a new film that is being written by the INL News Screen Play writer called
                                                     "Fraud and Murder in Haywicks Lane"
staring:
against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David
Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers,
Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar
clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction
of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for
serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice.

The concept of the names used in the film is based on the way the series of books the Triumph of Truth (Who is watching The Watchers?)
written by Stephen Carew-Reid and published by the Australian Weekend News a subsidiary of the INL News Group, have been written in that the
real name of those mentioned in the books are used to expose the guilty. So the real names of those involved of the fraud and murder of
the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the conspiracy to defraud his only child Valerie Ann Butler of her lawful rights to Haywicks Farm will be
used in the film to expose the guilty. The film as the books are based on the truth so any attempt to sue for civil or criminal defamation
will be vigorously defended by the INL News Group based on the fact the information is the truth and it is in the public interest to show
the world of the wrongful actions of those involved in the fraud and murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the conspiracy to defraud
his only child Valerie Ann Butler of her lawful rights to Haywicks FarM, which includes the wrongful way the High Court of Justice and the
office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and the masters, clerks, adjudicators, judges  and the staff at Treasury Solicitors and HM Land
Registry involved have operated in a wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt way to help their Freemason brothers Peter Urquhart and is
Freemason legal and investment partners end up with the title of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart
by fraudulent, wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt means.

So the unfortunate thing is that because you helped Freemason Peter Urquhart and is Freemason legal and investment partners end up with
the title of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart by fraudulent, wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt
means, this has meant that the INL News Group can not use Haywicks Farm as the film set for the film that is being written by the INL News Screen Play writer called
                                                     "Fraud and Murder in Haywicks Lane"
and thus the film can not go-ahead as planned which will cause in excess of one million pounds sterling in damages. The INL News Group
had agreed to pay Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood 100 million pounds for the use of the farm and for them to be
in the film living at Haywicks Farm after legal possession had finally been obtained by them. However, you all have acted is wrongful,
illegal, immoral and corrupt way to help their Freemason brothers Peter Urquhart and is Freemason legal and investment partners end up
with the title of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart by fraudulent, wrongful, illegal, immoral and
corrupt means, which means that Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood will not longer be paid the 100 million pounds
sterling for the use of Haywicks Farm which included them being filmed living in the house after winning their court cases to obtain  the
title deed and possession of Haywicks Farm So please be on notice that unless HM Land Registry immediately place
the title deed in the name of Valerie Ann Butler pursuant to the orders of Judge Iyer of the Manchester Registry of the High Court of
Justice Chancery Division made 29th December, 2011 which orders HM Land Registry to register the title of Haywicks Farm into the name of
Valerie Ann Butter, Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court
Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney
Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah
Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrarclerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart,
Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud
the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to
pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and serious criminal contempts of court for
knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice, will be sued for damages for in excess
of one billion pounds sterling by the INL News Group, its shareholders, partners and financiers and sued by Valerie Ann Butler,
Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood for in excess of 100 million pounds in damages, also for 50,000 pounds sterling a day in damages
for every day the property title of Haywicks Lane stays in the name of Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and not put in the name of
Valerie Ann Urquhart,

We also note this copy of a letter send to you by Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood demanding that the UN1 and RX1
Notices lodged against the title deed of Haywicks Farm over both or either the new of old  title number and that it would be illegal,
corrupt and wrongful for HM Land Registry to reject the registration of these UN1 and RX1 Notices as per the reason provided and many other
legal reasons

“ We noted from the new title search for Haywicks Farm, that the said Gary Roger Jouai has lodged a restriction notice pursuant to the
overage agreement in the contracts between the Urquharts and the said# Gary Roger Jouai, whch say that for 20 years any increase in value
over the purchase price of £660,000 has to be paid to the vendor. Now because of the court order dated the 29th December 2011 in 1MA3045
whereby the original grant of probate in favour of the said Gary Roger Jouai for my late father Herbert Henry Butler is null and void and of
no legal effect, and I am, the the rightful administrator of the well and the rightful owner of Haywicks Farm, then I and my two partners in
Haywicks Farm who we claim have the right to be the registered owners of Haywicks Farm, regardless of the dispute about the registration of
the title deed between us and the Urquharts, there is no doubt in law and in fact that myself, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood own all
the rights to right retristcion notice, not the said Gary Roger Jouai, so the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over Haywicks Farm by Stephen
Carew-Reid using both the news and old title numbers are validly lodged and should not be rejected or removed by HM Land Registry, even
though the property has now been ( we say quite illegally and wrongly) registered in the name of the Urquharts, however in the mean time
before this is sorted put in court to get the title into the correct names of Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood,
Stephen Carew-Reid's UN1 and RX1 notices should have to stay registered over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to at lease if nothing
else from the titles office point of view to protect out interests in the restriction notice lodged on the title deed at present with consent
of the Urquharts
WE also put you and HM Land Registry on notice that unless HM Land Registry put  the title into the correct names of Valerie Ann Butler,
Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood, an amount over over £100 million damages will be demanded from yourself and HM Land Registry
and other involved in the conspiracy to defraud our rights to ownership of Haywicks Farm

your kindly
Valerie Ann Butler
Thomas Allwood
Stephen Carew-Reid “


Yours sincerely


David Rosen
INL News Groups Legal and Investigative Team
Email: "David Rosen" <news@inlnews.com>


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Registry & Ors Your Ref:
N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 23, 2012 11:41 am
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, stephen carew-reid
<stephencarewreid@gmail.com>, David Rosen
<davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>


23rd  May, 2012

TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick


Dear Ms Brothers

Further to our earlier emails,

We noted from the new title search for Haywicks Farm, that the said
Gar Roger Jouai has lodged a restriction notice pursuant to the
overage agreement in the contracts between the Urquharts and the said
Gary Roger Jouai, whch say that for 20 years any increase in value
over the purchase price of £660,000 has to be paid to the vendor.
Now because of the court order dated the 29th December 2011 in 1MA3045
whereby the original grant of probate in favour of the said Gary Roger
Jouai for my late father Herbert Henry Butler is null and void and of
no legal effect, and I am, the the rightful administrator of the well
and the rightful owner of Haywicks Farm, then I and my two partners in
Haywicks Farm who we claim have the right to be the registered owners
of Haywicks Farm, regardless of the dispute about the registration of
the title deed between us and the Urquharts, there is no doubt in law
and in fact that myself, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood own all
the rights to right retristcion notice, not the said Gary Roger Jouai,
so the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over Haywicks Farm by Stephen
Carew-Reid using both the news and old title numbers are validly
lodged and should not be rejected or removed by HM Land Registry, eve
though the property has now been ( we say quite illegally and wrongly)
registered in the name of the Urquharts, however in the mean time
before this is sorted put in court to get the title into the correct
names of Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood,
Stephen Carew-Reid's UN1 and RX1 notices should have to stay
registered over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to at lease if nothing
else from the titles office point of view to protect out interests int
he restriction notice lodged on the title deed at present with consent
of the Urquharts
WE also put you and HM Land Registry on notice that unless HM Land
Registry put  the title into the correct names of Valerie Ann Butler,
Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood, an amount over over £100
million damages will be demanded from yourself and HM Land Registry
and other involved in the conspiracy to defraud our rights to
ownership of Haywicks Farm

your kindly
Valerie Ann Butler
Thomas Allwood
Stephen Carew-Reid

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:56 PM
Subject: Fwd: Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Registry & Ors Your Ref:
N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>,
p.urquhart29@btinternet.com, Marie-Claire Bleasdale
<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>




---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:55 PM
Subject: Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Registry & Ors Your Ref: N/A
Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William
Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)"
<clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Cc: David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen
<news@inlnews.com>, stephen carew-reid <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>


22nd May, 2012

TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

22nd May, 2012

Dear Ms Brothers

Further to our earlier emails,
I have now decided ot give a ful statement to the INL News Group and
help them in anyway with information for their next volume of Triumph
of Truth -Who Is Watching the Watchers
and will do everything to help them have to and Marie Clair Bleasdale
to be criminally prosecuted lose your positions as in HM Land Registry
and as barrister in the case of MC Bleasdale and make sure she  has
her legal license as well as you removed on a permamant basis and bed
publicly shared for generations to come for what you have done to me
and my late father Herbert Henry Butler

Kindest regards

Valerie Ann Butler



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:47 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William
Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)"
<clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
<ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen
<news@inlnews.com>, Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>,
stephen carew-reid <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>




22nd May, 2012

TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

22nd May, 2012

Dear Ms Brothers

Further to our earlier emails,

You and HM Land Registry known full well that Claim HC12C00678 has been properly and formally served on HM Land Registry and  the office
of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and in fact Treasury Solicitors have lodged a notice and submissions in relation to this claim which
the whole claim is requesting a stay and set aside orders on the orders of Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry made on the 16th February, 2012, and you and HM Land Registry are deliberately and knowingly lying in your letters including the last one this afternoon when you say that
"...Your application for a stay of the order of the Adjudicator dated 16 February 2012 has not been properly issued by the court and served on Land Registry....''

The application has been sealed by the High Court the fees have been paid on the claim in cash and HM Land Registry and the Adjudicator to
HM Land Registry have been served with a sealed copy of the claim andmTreasurer Solicitors have acknowledged service on behalf of  HM Land
Registry and the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry.

So your attempts to that effect of the orders of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry dated the 16th February, 2012 is illegal, fraudulent,
corrupt and aids and abets a serious conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and You and the other HM
Land Registry Staff continue to act in an illegal, wrongful and corrupt way and continue to commit criminal and civil offences of
staff in the HM Land Registry in Gloucester which are legally described as Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.

Yours kindly

Valerie Ann Butler

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:12 PM
Subject: Your Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: valerieannbutler@gmail.com


The document attached is an official requisition, reminder or letter
from Land Registry.  It is not a circular and relates either to an
application you have lodged with us or a property in which you have an
interest.  No paper copy of the item of correspondence will be sent to
you.
The document is in 'Portable Document Format'(PDF) which replicates
the appearance of the hard copy version. You will need Adobe Acrobat
Reader to open the document.  If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat Reader it can be installed free from www.adobe.com.  Please note that
as the document is in PDF format you cannot add text to any document that you need to complete and return to Land Registry.  You will have
to return any such completed document by post.
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk
If you have received this e-mail and it was not intended for you, please let us know, and then delete it. Please treat ourcommunications in confidence, as you would expect us to treat yours. Land Registry checks all mail
and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open anyattachments at your own risk.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless
Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
9 attachments — Download all attachments   View all images   Share all images  
HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011.JPG HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011.JPG
878K   View   Share   Download  
ValerieAnnJouai_MedicalCertificate_UnfitTo Travel_May-August-2012.jpg ValerieAnnJouai_MedicalCertificate_UnfitTo Travel_May-August-2012.jpg
148K   View   Share   Download  
INLNews_K_Brothers_HMLandReg_DamagesClaims_24thMay2012.docx INLNews_K_Brothers_HMLandReg_DamagesClaims_24thMay2012.docx
31K   View   Download  
HaywicksLaneTitleDeed_6.18pm_18-05-2012_GR327583.pdf HaywicksLaneTitleDeed_6.18pm_18-05-2012_GR327583.pdf
10K   View   Download  
HaywicksFarm_RegisterGR351346_T_Search5.20PM_22-5-2012_PL_JA_Urquhart.pdf HaywicksFarm_RegisterGR351346_T_Search5.20PM_22-5-2012_PL_JA_Urquhart.pdf
9K   View   Download  
VA_Butler_K_Brothers_HMLandRegistry-HaywicksFarmFraud_24th May 2012(1).docx VA_Butler_K_Brothers_HMLandRegistry-HaywicksFarmFraud_24th May 2012(1).docx
43K   View   Download  
VA-Butler_Susan Papworth_Assistant Land Registrar_5th May2012.docx VA-Butler_Susan Papworth_Assistant Land Registrar_5th May2012.docx
27K   View   Download  
AndrewMay_Statement_24-5-2012_HC11C004673_CH_2011_0567.docx AndrewMay_Statement_24-5-2012_HC11C004673_CH_2011_0567.docx
19K   View   Download  
AWN.bz_HMRegistryCorruptionPage_TakenFromInternet_24-05-2012.docx AWN.bz_HMRegistryCorruptionPage_TakenFromInternet_24-05-2012.docx
354K   View   Download  

24th May 2012
 
Urgent Attention:
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
  "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"Adjudicator HM" <alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
CC:"Peter Urquhart" <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>,
"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
24th  May, 2012
 
CC: Chief Justice, High Court of Justice
Andrew Morrett ace of his clerk: "Gifford, Suzanne" <suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, 
TO: Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790, Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk
 
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346 Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick
Your ref: N/A
Our ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
 
Re: One Billion damages claimed by the INL News Group and its shareholders, partners and financiers, Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid, Thomas Allwood,  against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attroney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice which will no doubt lead to the removal of her license to practice as a barrister in the United Kingdom.
 
Please see attached letter from the INL News Legal and Investigation Team making it clear that myself, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas  Allwood are putting  HM Land Registry on clear notice are claiming in excess of 20 million pounds damages which are increasing at 30,000 pounds a day HM Land Registry wrongly keep the title deed of Haywicks Farm in the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urqhuart and do not obey the orders of Justice Iyer made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 to order that HM Land Registry register the title of Haywicks Farm in the name of Valerie Ann Butler.
Also the HM Land Registry are on notice that they must allow the registration of the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged by Stephen Carew-Reid on the 17th May, 2012 against Haywicks Farm to protect the interests and/or ownership in Haywicks Farm of Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Butler and Thomas Allwood and it would be illegal, wrongful and/or corrupt for them not to do so. HM Land Registry are well aware from the court order of Justice Iyer made the 29th December, 2012 as attached states that I ( Valerie Ann Butler) and the rightful sole administrator and executor of the estate of my Late father Herbert Henry Butler and the owner of my Late Fathers interests in Haywicks Farm which can be now divided into two sections:
(a) The part right to possession and ownership of Haywicks Farm that Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart claim to have purchased for 660,000 pounds
(b) the part right to possession and ownership that is set out in the overage agreement and restriction that has been placed over the title of Haywicks Farm by the said Gary Roger Jouai.
 
We appreciate the HM Land Registry and the Urquharts are arguing that the UN1 and RX1 notices lodged by Stephen Carew-Reid over part (a) should not be allowed to be registered, which we do not agree is correct, however in the light of the order made by Justice Iyer on the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA3045 as attached, that there can be no dispute or doubt that the UN1 and RX1 Notices from HM Land Registry and Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart are rightfully lodged to protect my and my two partners, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood ownership and interests in Haywicks Farm that relates to part (b) being the part right to possession and ownership that is set out in the overage agreement and restriction that has been placed over the title of Haywicks Farm by the said Gary Roger Jouai.
 
Please also see attached my updated medical certificate showing I am unfit to travel to the UK until August, 2012 to attend court hearing regarding Haywicks Farm.
 
Yours kindly
 
Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid, Thomas Allwood
 
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <news@inlnews.com>
Date: Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:21 AM
Subject: RE: Damages for Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Reg & Ors Your Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, Adjudicator HM <alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, Peter Urquhart <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>, "Gifford, Suzanne" <suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: stephen carew-reid <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>, David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, news@inlnews.com, Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>

 
24th May, 2012
From:  David Rosen, INL News Groups Legal and Investigative Team
Email: "David Rosen" news@inlnews.com
Urgent Attention: "Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
  "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"Adjudicator HM" <alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
CC:"Peter Urquhart" <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>,
"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
24th  May, 2012
 
CC: Chief Justice, High Court of Justice
Andrew Morrett ace of his clerk: "Gifford, Suzanne" <suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, 
 
TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790, Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ, DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050, gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk, www.landregistry.gov.uk
 
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346, Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick
Your ref N/A
Our ref GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart, Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
 
Re: One Billion damages claimed by the INL News Group and its shareholders, partners and financiers, Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid, Thomas Allwood,  against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attroney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice which will no doubt lead to the removal of her license to practice as a barrister in the United Kingdom.
 
Please see attached letter
 
24th May, 2012
From:  David Rosen, INL News Groups Legal and Investigative Team
Email: "David Rosen" news@inlnews.com
 
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Damages for Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Reg & Ors Your Ref:
N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
From: <news@inlnews.com>
Date: Thu, May 24, 2012 1:00 am
To: "Valerie Butler" <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, "Katharine Brothers"
<Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office"
<gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "Adjudicator HM"
<alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, "Marie-Claire Bleasdale"
<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "Peter Urquhart"
<urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>
Cc: "stephen carew-reid" <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>, "David Rosen"

<davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
24th May, 2012
From:  David Rosen, INL News Groups Legal and Investigative Team
Email: "David Rosen" news@inlnews.com#
Urgent Attention:
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
  "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"Adjudicator HM" <alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
CC:"Peter Urquhart" <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>,
"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
24th  May, 2012
 
TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk
 
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04. 
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart, Title number GR351346, Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick
 
Re: One Billion damages claimed by the INL News Group and its shareholders, partners and financiers, Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid, Thomas Allwood,  against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attroney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice which will no doubt lead to the removal of her license to practice as a barrister in the United Kingdom.
 
You are well aware of the details and particulars of the serious civil and criminal wrongs you all have been involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice.
 
Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood have obviously suffered direct damages for the loss of the potential value of the property known as Haywicks Farm as a result of your criminal and civil wrongs committed against them, which is estimated over 20 million pounds sterling because of the long term potential development of the property. However there is another substantial loss because Haywicks Farm was to be used as a film set for a new film that is being written by the INL News Screen Play writer called
                                                     "Fraud and Murder in Haywicks Lane"
staring:
against Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale breaching her sworn duties and obligations as an attorney and for serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice.


The concept of the names used in the film is based on the way the series of books the Triumph of Truth (Who is watching The Watchers?) written by Stephen Carew-Reid and published by the Australian Weekend News a subsidiary of the INL News Group, have been written in that the real name of those mentioned in the books are used to expose the guilty. So the real names of those involved of the fraud and murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the conspiracy to defraud his only child Valerie Ann Butler of her lawful rights to Haywicks Farm will be used in the film to expose the guilty. The film as the books are based on the truth so any attempt to sue for civil or criminal defamation will be vigorously defended by the INL News Group based on the fact the information is the truth and it is in the public interest to show the world of the wrongful actions of those involved in the fraud and murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the conspiracy to defraud his only child Valerie Ann Butler of her lawful rights to Haywicks Far, which includes the wrongful way the High Court of Justice and the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and the masters, clerks, adjudicators, judges  and the staff at Treasury Solicitors and HM Land Registry involved have operated in a wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt way to help their Freemason brothers Peter Urquhart and is Freemason legal and investment partners end up with the title of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart by fraudulent, wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt means.
So the unfortunate thing is that because you helped Freemason Peter Urquhart and is Freemason legal and investment partners end up with the title of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart by fraudulent, wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt means, this has meant that the INL News Group can not use Haywicks Farm as the film set for the film
that is being written by the INL News Screen Play writer called
                                                     "Fraud and Murder in Haywicks Lane"
and thus the film can not go-ahead as planned which will cause in excess of one million pounds sterling in damages. The INL News Group had agreed to pay Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood 100 million pounds for the use of the farm and for them to be in the film living at Haywicks Farm after legal possession had finally been obtained by them. However, you all have acted is wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt way to help their Freemason brothers Peter Urquhart and is Freemason legal and investment partners end up with the title of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqeline Ann Urquhart by fraudulent, wrongful, illegal, immoral and corrupt means, which means that Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood will not longer be paid the 100 million pounds sterling for the use of Haywicks Farm which included them being filmed living in the house after winning their court cases to obtain  the title deed and possession of Haywicks Farm
So please be on notice that unless HM Land Registry immediately place the title deed in the name of Valerie Ann Butler pursuant to the orders of Judge Iyer of the Manchester Registry of the High Court of Justice Chancery Division made 29th December, 2011 which orders HM Land Registry to register the title of Haywicks Farm into the name of Valerie Ann Butter,
Owen Rhys Actions as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, High Court Master Teverson, High Court Judge Mann, High Court Judge David Richards, Master Price,HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale, HM Land Registry lawyer Katharine Brothers, Gloucester Land Registrar Julie Jenkins, HM Land Registrar clerk Sarah Canipel, HM Land Registrar clerk Claire Francis, HM Land Registrar clerk David Hodges, Peter Leslie Urquhart, Jaqueline Ann Urquhart, Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, Attorneys Langley Wellington, Julie Williams, and others for being involved with a conspiracy to defraud the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and well as being involved with a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers and serious criminal contempts of court for knowingly presenting false and misleading facts, information and law to the High Court of Justice, will be sued for damages for in excess of one billion pounds sterling by the INL News Group, its shareholders, partners and financiers and sued by Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood for in excess of 100 million pounds in damages, also for 50,000 pounds sterling a day in damages for every day the property title of Haywicks Lane stays in the name of Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and not put in the name of Valerie Ann Urquhart,
 
We also note this copy of a letter send to you by Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood demanding that the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged against the title deed of Haywicks Farm over both or  either the new of old  title number and that it would be illegal, corrupt and wrongful for HM Land Registry to reject the registration of these UN1 and RX1 Notices as per the reason provided and many other legal reasons
 
“ We noted from the new title search for Haywicks Farm, that the said Gar Roger Jouai has lodged a restriction notice pursuant to the overage agreement in the contracts between the Urquharts and the said Gary Roger Jouai, whch say that for 20 years any increase in value over the purchase price of £660,000 has to be paid to the vendor. 
Now because of the court order dated the 29th December 2011 in 1MA3045 whereby the original grant of probate in favour of the said Gary Roger Jouai for my late father Herbert Henry Butler is null and void and of no legal effect, and I am, the the rightful administrator of the well and the rightful owner of Haywicks Farm, then I and my two partners in Haywicks Farm who we claim have the right to be the registered owners of Haywicks Farm, regardless of the dispute about the registration of the title deed between us and the Urquharts, there is no doubt in law and in fact that myself, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood own all the rights to right retristcion notice, not the said Gary Roger Jouai, so the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over Haywicks Farm by Stephen Carew-Reid using both the news and old title numbers are validly lodged and should not be rejected or removed by HM Land Registry, eve though the property has now been ( we say quite illegally and wrongly) registered in the name of the Urquharts, however in the mean time before this is sorted put in court to get the title into the correct names of Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood, Stephen Carew-Reid's UN1 and RX1 notices should have to stay registered over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to at lease if nothing else from the titles office point of view to protect out interests int he restriction notice lodged on the title deed at present with consent of the Urquharts
WE also put you and HM Land Registry on notice that unless HM Land Registry put  the title into the correct names of Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood, an amount over over £100 million damages will be demanded from yourself and HM Land Registry and other involved in the conspiracy to defraud our rights to ownership of Haywicks Farm

your kindly
Valerie Ann Butler
Thomas Allwood
Stephen Carew-Reid “
 
Yours sincerely
David Rosen, INL News Groups Legal and Investigative Team, Email: "David Rosen" <news@inlnews.com>
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Registry & Ors Your Ref:
N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 23, 2012 11:41 am
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, 
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, stephen carew-reid
<stephencarewreid@gmail.com>, David Rosen
<davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>
 
23rd  May, 2012
 
TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk
 
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart, Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick
Your ref:N/A
Our refGR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346, Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick
 
 
Dear Ms Brothers
 
Further to our earlier emails,

We noted from the new title search for Haywicks Farm, that the said Gar Roger Jouai has lodged a restriction notice pursuant to the overage agreement in the contracts between the Urquharts and the said Gary Roger Jouai, whch say that for 20 years any increase in value over the purchase price of £660,000 has to be paid to the vendor. 
Now because of the court order dated the 29th December 2011 in 1MA3045 whereby the original grant of probate in favour of the said Gary Roger Jouai for my late father Herbert Henry Butler is null and void and of no legal effect, and I am, the the rightful administrator of the well and the rightful owner of Haywicks Farm, then I and my two partners in Haywicks Farm who we claim have the right to be the registered owners of Haywicks Farm, regardless of the dispute about the registration of the title deed between us and the Urquharts, there is no doubt in law and in fact that myself, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood own all the rights to right retristcion notice, not the said Gary Roger Jouai, so the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over Haywicks Farm by Stephen Carew-Reid using both the news and old title numbers are validly lodged and should not be rejected or removed by HM Land Registry, eve though the property has now been ( we say quite illegally and wrongly) registered in the name of the Urquharts, however in the mean time before this is sorted put in court to get the title into the correct names of Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood, Stephen Carew-Reid's UN1 and RX1 notices should have to stay registered over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to at lease if nothing else from the titles office point of view to protect out interests int he restriction notice lodged on the title deed at present with consent of the Urquharts
WE also put you and HM Land Registry on notice that unless HM Land Registry put  the title into the correct names of Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood, an amount over over £100 million damages will be demanded from yourself and HM Land Registry and other involved in the conspiracy to defraud our rights to ownership of Haywicks Farm

your kindly
Valerie Ann Butler
Thomas Allwood
Stephen Carew-Reid
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:56 PM
Subject: Fwd: Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Registry & Ors Your Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, p.urquhart29@btinternet.com, Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:55 PM
Subject: Haywicks Farm Fraud by HM land Registry & Ors Your Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Cc: David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>, stephen carew-reid <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>

22nd May, 2012
 
TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk
 
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref: N/A
Our ref: nGR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346, Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick
 
22nd May, 2012
 
Dear Ms Brothers
 
Further to our earlier emails, I have now decided ot give a ful statement to the INL News Group and help them in anyway with information for their next volume of Triumph of Truth -Who Is Watching the Watchers
and will do everything to help them have to and Marie Clair Bleasdale to be criminally prosecuted lose your positions as in HM Land Registry and as barrister in the case of MC Bleasdale and make sure she  has her legal license as well as you removed on a permamant basis and bed publicly shared for generations to come for what you have done to me and my late father Herbert Henry Butler
 
Kindest regards
 
Valerie Ann Butler
 
 
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:47 PM
Subject: Fwd: Your Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>, Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, stephen carew-reid <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>

 
 
22nd May, 2012
 
TO: Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar, Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ, DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk
 
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346, Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick
Your ref: N/A
Our ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346, Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwick
 
22nd May, 2012
 
Dear Ms Brothers
 
Further to our earlier emails,
 
You and HM Land Registry known full well that Claim HC12C00678 has been properly and formally served on HM Land Registry and  the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and in fact Treasury Solicitors have lodged a notice and submissions in relation to this claim which the whole claim is requesting a stay and set aside orders on the orders of Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry made on the 16th February, 2012, and you and HM Land Registry are deliberately and knowingly lying in your letters including the last one this afternoon when you say that
"...Your application for a stay of the order of the Adjudicator dated 16 February 2012 has not been properly issued by the court and served on Land Registry....''
 
The application has been sealed by the High Court the fees have been paid on the claim in cash and HM Land Registry and the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry have been served with a sealed copy of the claim and Treasurer Solicitors have acknowledged service on behalf of  HM Land Registry and the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry.
 
So your attempts to that effect of the orders of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry dated the 16th February, 2012 is illegal, fraudulent, corrupt and aids and abets a serious conspiracy to defraud and conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and You and the other HM Land Registry Staff continue to act in an illegal, wrongful and corrupt way and continue to commit criminal and civil offences of staff in the HM Land Registry in Gloucester which are legally described as
Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.
 
Yours kindly
 
Valerie Ann Butler
 
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:12 PM
Subject: Your Ref: N/A Our Ref: GR351346/A/034/KB
To: valerieannbutler@gmail.com

The document attached is an official requisition, reminder or letter from Land Registry.  It is not a circular and relates either to an application you have lodged with us or a property in which you have an interest.  No paper copy of the item of correspondence will be sent to you.    
The document is in 'Portable Document Format'(PDF) which replicates the appearance of the hard copy version. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to open the document.  If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat Reader it can be installed free from www.adobe.com.  Please note that as the document is in PDF format you cannot add text to any document that you need to complete and return to Land Registry.  You will have to return any such completed document by post.
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk


If you have received this e-mail and it was not intended for you, please let us know, and then delete it. Please treat our communications in confidence,
as you would expect us to treat yours. Land Registry checks all mail and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any
attachments at your own risk.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.
 

Assistant to Gloucester HM Land Registrar, Katharine Brothers, HM Land Regsitrar Julie Jenkins and top property dispute London Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang .........................................
that started in 1983 with the Murder of the Late Henry Herbert Butler and the forging of his will by well known Freemason solicitor Simon James Fisher at the time working for Freemason Eggleton Solicitors who were struck off from being solicitors by the Legal Complaints Tribunal, who then handed their legal files to Madge Lloyd Gibson, who knowing the will was a forgery presented the false will to the Probate Office for as fraudulent Grant of Probate to be issued, all with the long term aim of defrauding the Later Herbert Henry Butler and his only child, Valerie Ann Butler of their legal right to ownership of their 25 acres and farm house known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and have Haywicks farm fraudulently transferred into two of the fraud conspirators names Peter Leslie Urquhart and his wife Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, who had been legal clients of Eggletons solicitors and Madge Lloyd Gibson for over 30 years, who planned to hold the property as a front for all the other Freemason solicitors and ex-solicitors who are based in the Gloucester area including the Eccleton Family and their family development company Egdon Estates and Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington solicitors who are commonly known as Gloucestershire's Legal Mafia (GLM).

Assistant to HM Land Registrar Katharine Brothers, Gloucester HM Land Registrar  Julie Jenkins  and top property dispute London Barrister
Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang


22nd May 2012

TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

22nd May, 2012

Dear Ms Brothers

Further to our earlier emaIl we need to make the following points:

1. The INL News Investigation Team have obtained  a copy of about 20
internal HM Land Registry memos and records  created by the Gloucester
HM Land Registry Office dated from 6th January, 2011 till 17th May,
2012 which we are placing in an investigation file to be handed to the
Major Crime Squad of Scotland Yard.
These internal HM Land Registry memos and records  created by the
Gloucester HM Land Registry Office dated from 6th January, 2011 till
17th May, 2012  show conclusive evidence of  conspiracy to defraud and
conspiracy to pervert the course of justice along with other criminal
and civil offences committed by yourself and other staff in the HM
Land Registry in Gloucester which are legally described as
Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.
Some of the application reference numbers we have in our possession
are as follows:


1. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: 1740CZK
Applicants Name: Valerie Ann Jouai Priority Date: 6Jan 2011 - 12 Jan 2011
Priority Time: 18:19:47 By: Simons Muirhead Burton Reason: Unilateral Notice

2. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: C990FZK Applicants Name: .......
Priority Date: 11 Jan 2011 By: Claire Francis Hasten Code: Red Hasten
Date 11 Jan 2011 Group: 304, Location Date 20 January, 2011
Customer Name: STEPHEN REID B COM


3. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: C919FZK
Applicants Name: Valerie Ann Jouai Priority Period 12 Jan 2011 By:
David Hodges Reason: Unilateral Notice

4. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: Y750JZK
Applicants Name: .......... Priority Date: 17 Jan 2011, By: Claire Francis
Customer Name: Gloucester District Land Registry Chief Land Registrar
Reference: SR:VAJ: GR327583 DX7599 GLOUCESTER3, Tel: 0300-006-1111
Key Number: 0300-006-0050 Payment Method: NF - NO FEE


5. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: X046KZK
Applicants Name:......... Priority Date: 18 Jan 2011 Prority Time: 11:45:22,
By David Hodges Hasten Date: 18 Jan 2011
Customer Name: Simmons Muirhead & Burton Reference: MAS/JOUAI, Payment
Method: PP-Pre-PAID


6. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: C646KZK
Applicants Name:.......  Priority Time: 11:48:34, By: David Hodges
Hasten Date: 18 Jan 2011
Customer Name: Simmons Muirhead & Burton Reference: MAS/JOUAI, Payment
Method: PP-Pre-PAID

7. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: FB55B6F
Applicants Name:......... Priority Date: 19 JAN 2011 Priority Time:
09:13:56 By: David Hodges
Customer Name: MADGE LLOYD & GIBSON Reference: AKB/SJB?N1245/1
Customer Address: DD Account 34 Brunswick Road Gloucester GL1 1JJ DX
Address: DX7505 Telephone Number: 01452-520224 Key Number: 1518438 Fax
Number: 01452- 306866 Payment Method; DD Direct Debit Fee Payable: 50
pounds Fee Quoted 50 pounds

8. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: FB55C72
Applicants Name:........  Priority Date: 27 Jan 2011 Priority Time:
12:02:59 Last Activity: PC Reg. Creation Update By: Julie Williams
Location Information: GL LWR KB S/O
Customer Name: MADGE LLOYD & GIBSON Reference: AKB/SJB/U1018/4
Customer Address: DD Account 34 Brunswick Raod Gloucester GL1 1JJ DX
Address: DX7505 Telephone Number: 01452-520224 Key Number: 1518438 Fax
Number: 01452- 306866 Payment Method; DD Direct Debit Fee Payable: 550
pounds Fee Quoted 550 pounds


9. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: U299RZK
Applicants Name:........  Priority Date: 27 Jan 2011 Priority Time:
14:17:04 Last Activity: Data Captured  By: Claire Francis Location
Date: 20 JAN 2012
Customer Name: STEPHEN REID Reference: MAS/JOUAI
Customer Address: Reid and Associates, 3 Debra Court, Urangan, hervey
Bay, Queensland, Australia, 4655
Payment Method: PP- PRE-PAID

10. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: M599RZK
Applicants Name:...........................
Priority Date: 14:19:05 Last activity: Data Captured By: Claire Francis
Location Information: S/O adjudication, Location Group: 304 Location
Date: 20 JAN 2012
Customer Name: STEPHEN REID Reference: MAS/JOUAI
Customer Address: Reid and Associates, 3 Debra Court, Urangan, hervey
Bay, Queensland, Australia, 4655
Payment Method: PP- PRE-PAID

11. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: C346VML
Applicants Name:...........................
Priority Date: 21 FEB 2012 Priority Time: 08:54:06 Last activity: Data
Captured By: Sarah Canipel
Location Information: PB ADJ SO , Location Group: 1.100 Location Date:
22 March 2012 *case exported to Peterborough* Application method: Not
recorded
Customer Name: VALERIE ANN BUTLER
Reference: HAYWICKS FARM -VA BUTLER
Customer Address: View Point Banwell Road Hutton Avalon S24 9TZ


12.  Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: V446VML
Applicants Name:...........................
Priority Date:21 FEB 2012 Priority Time: 08:55:45 Last activity: Data
Captured By: Sarah Canipel
Location Information: PB L:GLG S/O SP, Location Group: 1.100 Location
Date: 27 FEB 2012
*case exported to Peterborough* Application method: Not recorded
Customer Name: VALERIE ANN BUTLER
Reference: HAYWICKS FARM -VA BUTLER
Customer Address: View Point Banwell Road Hutton Avalon S24 9TZ
Payment Method: PP- PRE-PAID

13. ......

You will no doubt be called as a witness when this all comes to a full
trial. civil and criminal to explains the full meaning of these  ans
other application references.
The factual reality that you and the other HM Land Registry Staff and
the Treasury Solicitors involve din advising you and HM Land Registry
in this matter are well aware of is that application notices were
lodged over the title deed of Haywicks Farm from the 6th January, 2011
by Valerie Butler/Jouai's London Solicitors Simmons Muirhead & Burton
and two different sets of UNI and RX1 Notices were also lodged with HM
Land Registry which arrived at HM Land Registry on the 12th January,
2011 which were deliberately lost by HM Registry Staff and the second
set arriving on the 18th January, 2011.. which were corruptly withheld
from being placed on the day list on the 27th January, 2011 at14:17:04
being very conveniently till two hours after the transfer lodged on
the 27th January, 2011 at 12:02:59 by Madge Lloyd Gibson attempting to
have Haywicks Farm transferred from the name of the said Gary Roger
Jouai to Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, as a favour to the
two most powerfully connected Freemason controlled and owned legal
firms in Gloucester, being Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington,
who are well known in Gloucester as the Gloucester Legal Mafia, so
that they try corruptly,illegally and wrongly with the help of
yourself and HM Land Registry Staff to push through the registration
of the transfer of Haywicks Farm title deed to defraud Valerie Ann
Butler/Jouai and her partners of their rightful ownership in Haywicks
Farm, by falsely pretending that a priority interest had not been
lodged over the title deed of Haywicks Farm prior to such transfer
being lodged.

Please note that if what you say is true, that you have on the 21st
May, 2012 completed the processing of the transfer to have Haywicks
Farm transferred from the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai to Peter
Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, without waiting for the outcome of
the stay and setaside applications inn HC12C00678 and the orders
sought in HC11C004156 declare the contracts between the said Gary
Roger Jouai and Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, null and
void and of no legal effect, and the outcome of the set aside
application in HC11C00473 which has been set down for hearing on the
24th July, 2012 in the High Court of Justice and have deliberately
ignore the court order made by Justice Iyer in 1MA3045 on the 29th
December, 2011 ordering HM Land Registry to amend the title deed of
Haywicks Farm from showing the registered owner as being the said Gary
Roger Butler to showing Valerie Ann Butler and have ignored the new
UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over the title deed of Haywicks Farm on the
17th May, 2012 by Stephen  Carew-Reid to protect the interests of
Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood in Haywicks
Farm, then what you and HM Land Registry have done is move your
criminal offences already committed of attempted Conspiracy to Pervert
to Course of Justice and Attempted Conspiracy to Defraud, to a
successful and completed Conspiracy to Pervert to Course of Justice
and  Conspiracy to Defraud, which increase the severity of your crimes
which means when you are all convicted of these crimes, which no doubt
you will be, the length of your prison terms will be a lot long and
what ever other punishment the courts hand out will me a lot more
harsh and of course ever worse the public perception and opinion of
your crimes will be a lot worse as the general public will see clearly
that you ignored all the warnings because you thought, like Rebecca
Brooks and her husband thought, that the power of the Freemasons and
the London Jewish Mafia would protect them from being exposed and/or
prosecuted  of the serious crimes that have now being accused and
charged for. The general public will have no sympathy for you at all
and will say he deserves the most harshest punishment the courts are
prepared to hand out as a warning and lesson to others you think they
can abuse their powers in senior positions in HM Government bodies.
We at the INL News Group certainly have no sympathy for your
deliberate willingness to be involved and help the other conspirators
who have been working on their plan to murder the Late Herbert Henry
Butler and forging his will and presenting this forged will for
probate, all with the end aim of defrauding him and his only child
Valerie Ann Butler of their rightful ownership of a valuable
development property in Gloucester that consists of about 25 acres on
two sides of Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester and a two story farm
house which has the potential for a development profit in the next 20
years to the conspirators of over 20 million pounds.

Good luck for the future.. you will need all the luch you can get from now on..

Yours  sincerely

INL News Legal, Editorial and Investigative Team


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Fwd: Our Ref: GR351346/A/223/JW
From: <news@inlnews.com>
Date: Mon, May 21, 2012 3:45 pm
To: "Valerie Butler" <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, "Katharine Brothers"
<Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office"
<gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "Adjudicator to HM Land
Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: "David Rosen" <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>,
davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com, "Marie-Claire Bleasdale"
<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "David Rosen"
<david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>



TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

22nd May, 2012

Dear Ms Brothers

By the looks of things your legal career with HNM Land Registry is all but over
You have become a complete liability to HM Land Registry and have
destroyed the good name that HM Land Registry ever had.
It is time you started looking for a new job, may be best in another
country that doe snot have extradition proceedings with England,
before you are carted away in hand cuffs by the police from the
Gloucester Offices of HM land Registry to join the ranks of Rebecca
Brooks in the Royal Courts of Justice on conspiracy to defraud and
conspiracy to pervert the course of justice along with other criminal
and civil offences committed by yourself and other staff in the HM
Land Registry in Gloucester which are legally described as
Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.

Good luck for the future.. you will need all the luch you can get from now on..

Yours  sincerely

INL News Legal, Editorial and Investigative Team

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Our Ref: GR351346/A/223/JW
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, May 21, 2012 3:30 pm
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, David Rosen
<davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>

To:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

22nd May, 2012

Dear Ms Brothers

You and the other HM Land Registry Staff continue to act in an
illegal, wrongful and corrupt way and continue to commit criminal and
civil offences of staff in the HM Land Registry in Gloucester which
are legally described as
Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.
You have also joined in with barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale, Owen
Rhys and Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart is a
conspiracy to defraud me and my partners of your lawful rights to
ownership Haywicks Farm and also joined together in a conspiracy to
pervert the course of Justice which are all civil and criminal wrongs
which you all are guilt5y of and along with HM Land Registry as well
as yourselves can be civilly sued as well a criminally charges, which
no doubt you eventually will once a complete police and judicial
inquiry is completed.

Your actions have also also helped bring the International Media's
attention and HM Land Registry, yourself. Barrister Marie Clair
Bleasdale and other corrupt judges, masters and adjudicators who have
helped such an Owen Rhys, Master Teverson, Justice Mann, Justice
Morgan, Justice David Richards Master Price,have now been made famous
on the world Internet and will be recorded in the shame files of the
INL News next publication of The Triumph of Truth (Who is Watching The
Watchers?) which all volumes are help permanently in the National
Library in Canberra for generations to come to read.

Please see:
http://awn.bz/HMLandRegistryCorruption.html

http://awn.bz/HMLandRegistryCorruption.html

Assistant to HM Land Registrar Katharine Brothers, Gloucester HM Land
Registrar  Julie Jenkins  and top property dispute London Barrister
Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang


Also you have no reply to my request to acknowledge the UN1 and RX1
Notices filed by Stephen Carew-Reid on the 17th May, 2012 at HM Land
Registry which attaches a copy of the seal court application for a
stay and a copy of the payment to the court for such stay application.
You in your letters dated the 21st and 22nd February, 2012 stated that
if HM Land Registry have been noticed that a stay on the orders of
Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, that HM Land
Registry would refrain from giving effect to such orders.

Please look forward to further international publicly of your  and the
other HM Land Registry staff's illegal, wrongful and corrupt actions,
a full police and judicial inquiry and HM Land Registry and yourself
and other HM Land Registry staff members being sued for millions of
pounds in damages and be publicly shamed in the world media for ever.

Kindest regards

Valerie Ann Butler
"Valerie Butler" <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>,

CC:
"David Rosen" <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>,
"David Rosen" <news@inlnews.com>,

Date: 21 May 2012

From:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

To:
"Valerie Butler" <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>

Valerie Ann Butler
C/O View Point
Banwell Road
Hutton
Avon
BS24 9TZ

Dear Ms Butler,
I refer to previous correspondence and your email sent at 12:17 on
17 May 2012. I confirm that the application for registration of the
transfer dated 13 December 2012 in favour of Mr and Mrs Urquhart
has now been completed and the other applications which were
lodged on your behalf and referred to in my letter dated 3 May 2012
have been cancelled.
Your application for a stay of the order of the Adjudicator dated 16
February 2012 has not been properly issued by the court and
served on Land Registry. Accordingly in the absence of a stay we
are entitled to proceed with the application for registration of the
transfer.

Yours sincerely,
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:18 PM
Subject: Our Ref: GR351346/A/223/JW
To: valerieannbutler@gmail.com



The document attached is an official requisition, reminder or letter
from Land Registry.  It is not a circular and relates either to an
application you have lodged with us or a property in which you have an
interest.  No paper copy of the item of correspondence will be sent to
you.
The document is in 'Portable Document Format'(PDF) which replicates
the appearance of the hard copy version. You will need Adobe Acrobat
Reader to open the document.  If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat
Reader it can be installed free from www.adobe.com.  Please note that
as the document is in PDF format you cannot add text to any document
that you need to complete and return to Land Registry.  You will have
to return any such completed document by post.
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk


If you have received this e-mail and it was not intended for you,
please let us know, and then delete it. Please treat our
communications in confidence,
as you would expect us to treat yours. Land Registry checks all mail
and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you
open any
attachments at your own risk.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless
Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
 
Friday 18th May 2012

Urgent Attention:
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk May, 2012
 
Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke
 
Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers


"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
 
Please see attached High Court Application for your urgent attention that was sent to you yesterday and a copy also attached to the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged by me Stephen Carew-Reid yesterday (17th May 2012) with HM Land Registry, at the West Croyden Office, which should arrive by DX today from HM Registry West Croyden Office.
It would be much appreciated if you could email me to confirm you have received them at the Gloucester HM Land Registry Office,.

Yours sincerely

Stephen Carew-Reid
email: "stephen carew-reid" <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>,


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:54 PM
Subject: UN1-RX1 Notices lodged by SCarew-Reid 17th May 2012 HM Land Registry,
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>, Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, stephencarewreid@gmail.com


Friday 18th May 2012

Urgent Attention:
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk May, 2012
 
Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke
 
Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers


"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <
MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <
Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <
ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
 
Please see attached High Court Application for your urgent attention
we are asking the High Court to grant a formal stay on the orders Owen Rhys  the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry made on the 16th February, 2012 concerning Haywicks Farm title deed without  a hearing, however it may well be that the High Court may insist that a formal open oral hearing where all parties have the opportunity to have their say and present verbal and written submissions, and in that case we are asking the court to list this application for a formal oral open hearing on the 24th July, 2012 in court 10 in the Rolls Building, Fetta Lane, London. when we already have a hearing set down before a judge to argue setting aside the orders of Justice Mann who made orders refusing to grant leave to appeal the orders made by Master Teverson in the original High Court action taken out on me behalf of John Carew-Reid as trustee and power of attorney for me being HC11C00473
The only reason why Master Teverson struck out HC111C00473 was because he felt that English Law did not allow a non solicitor to be a claimant on behalf of another person in the capacity as trustee and/or power of attorney. However, Master Teverson is absolutely wrong on this legal point, because  High Court Judge, Justice Paul Morgan has allowed an action to continue involving the other High Court claim Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale is involved with between Janice Pritchard as trustee for Robert Carter and Janice Pritchard as trustee for John Carew-Reid against Fineland Investments Limited and others. Justice Morgan has also gone one step further by granting leave to Fineland Investments Limited and its solicitors Bude Natham Iwanier and their counsel Marie Clair Bleasdale to issue a counter claim against Janice Pritchard as trustee for Robert Carter and Janice Pritchard as trustee for John Carew-Reid, thus further cementing the English Law in the High Court of Justice whereby it has become legally acceptable for a non solicitor is be a claimant as trustee and/or power of attorney for another person. Plus there has been so many other false and misleading facts and points of law that has been used by Justice Mann as a basis of his orders, that there is no doubt that his orders refusing leave to appeal the orders made by Master Teverson in HC11C00473 striking out that action will be set aside in due course. No that that makes any real difference as far as sorting out the legal arguments with the rightful ownership and who should be the rightful registered owner of  Haywicks Farm, because the other High Court claims and orders made since HC11C00473 was stuck out have taken over from HC11C00473 and really y passed HC11C00473, so the outcome of HC11C00473 has become irrelevent, other than the facts, that you and the Treasury solicitors that are working behind the scenes on this case for you preparing all your letter to me. are well aware of that Owen Rhys made his wrongful orders on the 16th February, 2012 on a false fact presented by Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale on behalf of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart to Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012 that the leave to appeal oral hearing had been heard and determined. You will notice that the hearing before Justice Mann was in March, 2012 after the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 so this is clear evidence that the adjudicator's ruling was based on a false claim that the leave to appeal oral hearing had been fully determined by the High Court of Justice.

As you are well aware, the internal records of the Gloucester HM Land Registry Office clearly show a conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers by yourself, HM Land Resgistrar for Gloucester Julie Jenkins, and HM Land Registry Clerks Claire Francis,  David Hodges, Julie Williams and others by the clear provable and undisputeable fact that every effort was made by the afforementioned and/or others so clandestinely, wrongly, corruptly and/or illegally lost, mislaid etc the first set of UN1 and RX1 notices set over to Gloucester HM Land Registry to be lodged over Haywicks Farm title deed to protect my claims over the property, by a clerk in HM Land Registry Gloucester Office falsely pretending they were set of to my London Solicitors Simon Muirhead and Burton, which was never received by  my London Solicitors Simon Muirhead and Burton,and thus obviously never sent too them by Gloucester HM Land Registry, so that this would help give a window of opportunity for the two sets of solicitors involved Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson to have the transfer from Gary Roger Jouia to the Urquharts lodged with HM Land Registry and logged on to the day list in at a priority dated when there was no prior notices of claim against the title deed of Haywicks Farm. Their obviously corrupt contacts in the Gloucester Office of HM Land Registry were keeping them informed about any other claims and/or applications against the title deed of Haywicks Farm  and were obviously well aware of the application notices which were lodged against Haywicks Farm title deed by  my London Solicitors Simon Muirhead and Burton, with the first one being lodged on the 6th January, 2011 and renewed three times thus keeping a constant and continued notice of claim over the Haywicks Farm title deed for me until my UN1 and RX1 Notices were formerly lodged, with the first ones lodged on the 12th January, 2012 as per Gloucester HM Land Registry Internal Records, ( which were deliberately made to disappear by HM Land Registry clerks, never to be seen again) and the second lot of UN1 and RX1 notices arriving at HM Land Registry on the 18th January, 2011, while the application notice lodged by  my London Solicitors Simon Muirhead and Burton, were still current against the Haywicks Farm Title deed and second lot of fees provided with the second lot of UN1 and RX1 Notices. So a master plan had to be divided to  help create  a window of opportunity for the two sets of solicitors involved Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson for have the transfer from Gary Roger Jouia to the Urquharts lodged with HM Land Registry and logged on to the day list in at a priority dated when there was no prior notices of claim against the title deed of Haywicks Farm. The plan had worked well with organising the first lot of UN1 and RX1 Notices to disappear, and eventually the application notices would run out of time and there would be no prior claim from me or my representatives over Haywicks Farm title deed so the transfer could be logged onto the day list with no prior claim. However, along came the second lot of UN1 and RX1 Notices which arrived on the 18th January, 2011 at Gloucester HM Land Registry Office from Australia by special courier mail with a second lot of lodging fees attached which should have been immediately logged onto the day lost on the 18th January at the hour, minute and second they arrived at the Gloucester Office of HM Land Registry, however . So what was illegally oranised by public officers by yourself, HM Land Resgistrar for Gloucester Julie Jenkins, and HM Land Registry Clerks Claire Francis,  David Hodges, Julie Williams and others  in a clear  conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers, was for the second lot of UN1 and RX1 Notices to e put in a cupboard and not logged onto the day list as they should have been on the 18th January, 2011, and instead they were corruptly and wrongly shown as being logged onto the day list at 14:17:04 on the 27th January, 2011, conveniently about two hours after  Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson orgainsed for have the transfer from Gary Roger Jouia to the Urquharts logedd with HM Land Registry  and logged onto the day list at 12:02:59 on the 27th January, 2011. This creating to on paper window of opportunity for  Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson to have the transfer from Gary Roger Jouia to the Urquharts lodged with HM Land Registry logged onto the day list without showing any prior claims on the title of Haywicks Farm
This is clear cut corruption, involving a conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers, and you and treasury solicitors, even if not directly involved in doing this illegal wrongful and/or corrupt behaviour, are definately involved in helping to cover it up., by trying to quickly have Haywicks Farm transferred to Mr and Mrs Urquhart and by passing and ignoring the court order made the 29th December, 2011 by Justice Iyer of the High Court ordering HM Land Registry to remove the name of Gary Roger Jouai from the title deed of Haywicks Farm and replace it with my name Valerie Ann Butler, and ignoring the other various High Court claims and applications that are still pending concerning the rightful ownership of Haywicks Farm, in the hope by quickly but illegally and wrongly transferring the title deed from the name of Gary Roger Jouai to the Urquharts, the problem will all get buried and go away.
Please understand that the only way this problem is going to go away for the Gloucester office of HM Land Registry and its staff is for the  HM Land Registry to obey the court order made the 29th December, 2011 by Justice Iyer of the High Court ordering HM Land Registry to remove the name of Gary Roger Jouai from the title deed of Haywicks Farm and replace it with my name Valerie Ann Butler.

Kindest regards

Valerie Ann Butler
Email: 


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Fwd: Appl_Joinder-Stay_ContemptCourt_HC12C00678_Made-16-05-2012(WOutCoveringLetter)
To: David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, stephencarewreid@gmail.com

David  hello,
Thanks for your comprehensive e-mail - I hope we have cleared a few misunderstandings.
First of all say "hello" to Janice from me.
 

You are right in the work you have done could not have been done by any solicitor - you have stuck your neck out in a big way, so do not think I do not appreciate your will-power and dedication to this sad and sordid case!!

As I understand it to-day from the extraction of the Deeds of Title THE TWIRP still has the Deeds in his name, as you have blocked it onwards.
You are right -  the Adjudicator Owens in our February sessions was very embarrassed and put out that we had gone through Manchester Court - like where did this come from 
A long, and as you know a very corrupt story - as you read from his report I told him if you do not adjourn this case here and now I have no alternative to take this matter to the police - as I was advised to do by very trust-worthy solicitors (I worked for David Hickey) editor of "The Sun Herald" in Sydney and Alex Morrow knew about my case and that is how I came in touch with Simon Muirhead & Burton who were solicitors in London for the newspaper.
 
All in all David, if you can see any way fit to continue on the massive job you started on that would be great.!
 
I will send you a further medical certificate to-morrow.

.
Close for now.
Regards,
Valerie.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Appl_Joinder-Stay_ContemptCourt_HC12C00678_Made-16-05-2012(WOutCoveringLetter)
To: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>


Urgent Attention:
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk May, 2012
 
Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke
 
Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers


"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <
MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <
Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <
ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
 
Please see attached High Court Application for your urgent attention:
 
Any attempt by yourselves and/or any staff member of HM Land Registry and/or HM Land Registry to attempt to  be in any way involved with  giving effect to the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, will be seen as further attempts by you all to conspire to pervert the course of Justice, conspirsacy to defraud,contempt of court and malefiance of public officers which are serious civil and criminal wrongs which one of the lost powerful people in the United Kingdom Rebecca Brooks and her husband and helpers have now been charged with, So so not think for a second that anyone in the Treasury Solicitors Office and the powerful Freemasons,
( which my son in law is a member of in Australia, so I know who they are and how they work and the power base they have), will protect you in the end as a female non Freemason solicitor in the Crown Solicitors Office will end up having no fear in prosecuting you all if they feel that this is necessary
 
yours kindly
 
Thomas Allwood for the claimants in HC12C00678 Being Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Jouai and Thomas Allwood
Address for service for the Claimants:15 Home Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9JR
In the High Court of Justice Chancery  Division
Claim Number: HC12 C00678
                              and HC11C04156 and HC11C00473
Claimants
Stephen Carew-Reid
Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai
Thomas Allwood
Defendants
HM Land Registry
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart
Antonia Alfresdo Maria Nicolosi and Ruth Helen Nicolosi
Gary Roger Butler/Jouai
Application for Joinder, Application to consolidate claims, contempt of court against Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale, application for stay of order made by Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012, application to vacate hearing before Master Price in Claim Number: HC11C04156 on the 5th July, 2012 for application to strike out and re-list before a High Court Judged in Chambers on the 24th July, 2012 in Court 10, Rolls Building, Fetta Lane London.
 
Orders Sought:
1.       To have the following parties joined to HC12C00678 for acting in a way that they have conspired to pervert the course of justice and in a conspiracy to defraud the  claimants being Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Butler and Thomas Allwood of the lawful rights in a property  know as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE  and also know as Title Number GR327583 and also known as Title Number GR351346:
 (a) Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale
(b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester
(c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester
(d) Treasury Solicitors. 
                        Particulars of Conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers
 Particulars of the parts played in the conspiracy to defraud will exceed three folios and bet set out at trial of this action, however it is noted that some of the wrongful acts they have committed is to deliberately with wilful intent to harm the claimants have presented false and misleading facts , information and legal arguments in letters and submissions (written and verbal) that have been presented to the High Court of Justice and to the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and other letters to the claimants  and as basis for wrongfully claiming they can by pass a number of current court actions and applications that are pending in the courts in HC12C00678, HC11C04156 and HC11C00473 concerning the rightful ownership and who should rightfully ne registered on the title deed as the registered owner of the property known as Haywicks Farm and a court order made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA3045 by High Court Judge Iyer  which states that HM Land Registry should remove the name of “the said Gary Roger Jouai” from the title deed of the property known as Haywicks Farm, and replace it with Valerie Ann Butler. One of the most serious deliberate false statements made (a)  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors is that  HC12C00678 is not a live action because the lodging fees have not been paid, when they all know from the High Court records that the lodging fee was paid for in cash and that the false story that the lodging fee had not been paid was deliberately made up by (a) Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors as a way of arguing that there was no stay and/or set aside order applied against the orders made by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, because  Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester , Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester , Sarah Canipel acting as Objections Clerk for HM Land Registry had in letters dated 21st and 22nd February, 2012 as authorised agents , servants, and/or otherwise made undertakings on behalf of HM Land Registry that as soon as HM Land Registry are notified that  there is a stay application to stay the orders of Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry made in the court, that HM Land Registry not to give effect to the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart. The main aim of the conspiracy being to make sure that well known Freemason Peter Leslie Urquhart and his well known Freemason Partners who have a great power and influence in the English Legal System , The High Court of Justice, Treasury Solicitors, the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and the Office of the Land Registry end up with control of the title deed of Haywicks Farm in the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart as trustee for their various silent Freemason Partners so they can complete a multi million pound luxury residential development of Haywicks Farm within  the next 20 years with a expected net profit of over 20 million pounds to be shares amongst Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart and their various silent Freemason Partners who include powerful and well connected English solicitors and their families. So, because the issue of HC12C00678 which has asked for a stay and set aside orders against the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, meant that HM Land registry had to honour their undertaking not to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, made in the letters written by   Sarah Canipel acting as Objections Clerk for HM Land Registry on the 21st February, 2012 and Katharine Brothers acting a Assistant to Julie Jenkins the HM Land Registrar for Gloucester on the 22nd February, 2012, HM Land Registry could not legally process  a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, unless they could make up the false claim that the lodging fees for HC12C00678 had not been paid, which if this was true, the HC12C00678 would be stayed until these fees were paid. The making up of the false claim that the court  fees of HC12C00678 had not been paid by the claimants is one of the most serious examples of a conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice and conspiracy to defraud made by HM Land Registry and Treasury Solicitors staff and one of the most well respected property dispute barristers in London, that the English Legal System has seen for long time. It is also noted that Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester , Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester  and  Treasury Solicitor   have committed a common law tort of maleficance of public officers and this can be sued personally for damages as well as in their office as representing HM Land Registry owned by the Government of the United Kingdom and  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale has committed a serious contempt of court as  barrister for knowingly presenting false and misleading information to the court and has breach many of the oaths, rules, undertakings and obligations a barrister in the United Kingdom has to abide by and thus should be struck off from being allowed to practice law in the United Kingdom as wel as pay damages that have been causes y such deliberate and calculated wrongdoing.  For all these reasons there in no doubt that (a)  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors should be joined to  HC12C00678 as defendants to be made to account for such wrong doing and also for the reason that they must be immediately restrained from using their power in HM Land Registry to wrongfully and for an illegal and/or wrongful purpose from being able to give effect to  the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart.
2.       To join and/or consolidate High Court Claims HC12C00678, HC11C04156, and HC11C00473 and 1MAC00473.
3.       Application for a stay to  the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, until the full determination and/or carrying out of all applications and claims for orders sought and/or made in HC12C00678, HC11C00415, HC11C00473 and 1MA3045, and/or until further order.
4.       Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry, Julie Jenkins Acting asHM  Land Registrar and HM Land Registrty be restrained from  processing a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart until the full determination and/or carrying out of all applications and claims for orders sought and/or made in HC12C00678, HC11C00415, HC11C00473 and 1MA3045, and/or until further order.
5.       Application lodged by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Urquhart in HC11C004156 to strike out HC11C004156 that has been listed before Master Price on the 5th July, 2012 be vacated and re-listed before High Court Judge in Chambers on the 24th July, 2012 in Court 10, Rolls Building, Fetta Lane, London at the same time as an application to set aside the orders made by Mann J in HC11C00473 has already been listed.
6.       The orders made by Master Price in HC11C04156 on the 10th May, 2012 be set aside on a number of grounds including that fact that the claimant was not served and/or had knowledge of the application that was argued on the 10th May, 2012 in HC11C04156 and was not in attendance in person and/or by legal representative at the hearing before Master Price on the 10the May, 2012in HC11C04156.
7.       That 28 days for service on Valerie Ann Butler of the strike out application by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Urquhart in HC11C004156 to strike out HC11C004156 and all supported statements of truth and submissions be allowed because Valerie Ann Butler is currently in Australia because she is too sick to return to the United Kingdom at present.
8.       Costs of this application be in the cause.
9.       Any further orders the court feels are just and fair to make.
Dated: 16th May, 2012
Signed
...............................................................................................
Thomas Allwood for the claimants in HC12C00678 






NEWS RELEASE
Morgan J of the High Court of Justice in london has be voted the most corrupt judge in english legal history by the INL News Legal investigative team 
see inlnews.com  to read the full story


Simon Jackson
Solicitor, Fishburns LLP, 60 Fenchurch Street
London EC3M 4AD
Direct dial: +44 (0)20 7280 8944

Dear Simon

Please see attached submissions please print out and add to a new folder for the court to make ssure all information is before the court today

 I am away on filming project and you as l knew, that  this hearing had been set down at a time that we could attend.
We also understand that Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter have been evicted from their bed site this morning and they believe that it was the powerful Justice Paul Morgan and the powerful defendants and their barrister and solicitors are behind their latest eviction to put them back on the street with no where ot live by using their powerful corrupt conenctions with the Sutton Council to have them evected from their temporary bed sit after the were worngly evicted omn the 1st April, 2011  from their home a 1 Garratt Close, Beddingto, Surrey, in the Sutton  Borough of London where they havd been living for over 16 years and had a life tenancy there.

Please inform Justice Paul Morgan of this fact


Kindest regards

Claimants in HC11C00580
Janice Pritchard and Others v Nathan Tietelbaum and Others


On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Simon Jackson <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com> wrote:
 <<04-07-11-1.pdf>> Dear Sir/ Madam,

Plese find attached our client's statement of costs for the hearing this
morning.

Yours faithfully
Simon Jackson
Solicitor
Fishburns LLP
60 Fenchurch Street
London EC3M 4AD
Direct dial: +44 (0)20 7280 8944
Fax: +44 (0)20 7280 8899
Email:
jacksons@fishburnslaw.com

In The High Court of Justice - Chancery Division
HC06C02639 Fineland Investments Limited v Pritchard
And
HC11C00580 Pritchard and Ors v Tietelbaum and Ors
Further Submissions in support of having Strike Out –Summary Judge
ment-Civil Restraint Applications in HC11C00580 heard at the same hearing as the set aside application in HC06C02639 on the 8th November, 2011 for application dated 2nd June, 2011 to be heard 27th June, 2011 and for adjournment of HC11C00580
 
Dated 25th June , 2011

Urgent Attention:
Johnathan Barry Kandler

"JKandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, Jono Kandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, MCB

"JKandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, Jono Kandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, MCB <mcbleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "Mooney, Eamon" <E.Mooney@kennedys-law.com>, Simon Jackson <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>, Vikki Courtney <VCourtney@blg.co.uk>, Sophie Ruffles <SRuffles@blg.co.uk>, "Hibbert, Nick" <N.Hibbert@kennedys-law.com>,jbk@bnilaw.co.uk <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk> 

 
To: Simon Jackson; Sophie Ruffles; JKandler; Hibbert,Nick; Vikki Courtney; Eamon Mooney (Kennedys - Birmingham); Marie-Claire Bleasdale; david.rosen@inlnews.com; admin@jamison.biz; Watson, Heather (HMCS-RCJ, RCJ-Chancery); info@iwg.co.uk; geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk; William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers); Ravi Nayer; Tony Nurse-Marsh; Francis Bacon (Hailsham Chambers); Meny Bude; Elizabeth Bell; Hailsham Chambers; Gaby Kaiser; Helen Jenkins; Robin Lambert; Gifford, Suzanne
 

Further information and submissions for Judge and Defendants to asscess and comprehend and refer to in consideratioon of any orders made in HC11C00580 and HC06C02639

Dated 24-06-2011

Filed by Complainants in HC11C00580

1. There is ample evidence that seems to have been deliberately withheld from the trial judge on the 11th and 12th October, 2010 in HC06C02639 and withheld from Justice Paul Morgan at various hearings of  HC11C00580 and HC06C02639  from  the files of solicitors Denniss Mathews, Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier  (please see full files of solicitors Denniss Mathews, Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier which will be produced of full discovery- some have been produces more to come)  and further supporting information that came to light at the trial on the 11th and 12th October, 2010 in HC06C02639 before Acting Deputy Judge Alison Foster QC that show before the 1st August 2004 (rough date of Janice Pritchard appounting Denniss Matthews to look after her interests in the proposed Fineland Transactions) and after the 19th August, 2004 (being the date that Janice Pritchard sacked Denniss Matthews form prepresenting her anymore-see letter of Janice Pritchard on files of Dennis Mattews-such letter was not before the Trial Judge on the 11th and 12th October 2004-deliberately withheld by Denniss Mathews, Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier form trial judge), that Denniss Matthews  had been acting for Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies for along time before August 2004 in relation to purchase by the Fineland Group of right to buy Council houses and other matters, and acting formt he 19th August 2004 onwards and still acts for the interests of Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies, and is in fact very dependant on regular income from Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies and without such income Denniss Matthews would have severve financial problems and would have had sever financila problems int helast few years in an economic environment where many solicitors are going into bacnkrupty, losing their jobs and/or closing down their practices and/or down sizing because of the recssion.
One part of the devious and clandistine conspiracy to defraud committed by the Defendants in HC11C00580 including Denniss Mathews, Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier and Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies, was to try and faslely pretend Dennis Matthews was not working for Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies, by using Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier to do a lot of the instructing rather than coming directly from Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies, with the same situation happening between Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier, to falsely make out Ingram Winter Green  was no longer working for Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies when they toopk over the upfront running of HC06C02639,, so that when needed
Denniss Mathews and Ingram Winter Green can say that..." Oh we do not work for Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies..." and in particular with Denniss Matthews they wanted to a false impression "... that at no time did we accept any direct instructions from Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies..." when in fact all the instructions came through either Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier... There is plenty of obvious undisputed evidence to show the  "In bed together Link between Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies Denniss Mathews andIngram Winter Green.."
The link between Denniss Mathews, Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies  and Bude Nathan Iwanier is still there but a lot cleverly covered up..however can be show by the way Denniss Matthews always defends the Fineland Contracts on the side of Fineland and when Nigek Matthews was supinered to court on the 11-12th October, 2010 his father came willingly instead of Nigel Matthews... to protect his sone and tell the strory tot he court int he light that Fineland and Nathan Tietelbaum wanted to present to the court.. to help them get the orders of posesison and title ownership of 1 Garratt Close Beddington, Surrey they required.
It is lcera in the evidence that Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies were from before 2004 and after 2004 and continuing till today ar ethe overall paymaster for Denniss Mathews, Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier...Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies  seem to have unlimietd cash money in official and black monery to pay who ever and when ever they want something done to make sure one way or anothe rthey ghet their own way in the end. For example Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies are paying about cash £1,000 to 2,000 abd other benefits (no taxation paid on this money and fringe benefits) a week to Hengarian Thugs armed iwth shovels and baseball bats to bash anyone that comes near 1 Garratt Close Beddington, Surrey  not authorised by Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies  and/or his agentds, solcitors, enforcement people etc.
From the 19th August onwards Denniss Mathews and Ingram Winter Green worked togetehr underinstructions from Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies to try and obtaint he £126,000 paid to the Sutton Council back to Fineland and paid the £20,000 that was the proposed depsot to go to Janice Pritchard, back to Fineland. This £20,000 as evidenced in varuious letter between Denniss Mathews and Ingram Winter Green betwwen 19th August, 2004 and October, 2004 and tghe transcripts of the 11th-12th October, 2010.
This showed that any alleged contract was clearly recinded on the request of the alleged purchaser Fineland and/or its agents and that no contrcat can be alleged from September 2004 onwards,
Please also note th eletter dated 19-10-2004 from Denniss Mathews to Ingram Winter Green plus othwe rletetrs around that time showing the £20,000 deposit was requesed to be returned to Fineland and was returned to Fineland around the end of September, 2004.
Also see the email form IWG to Nathan Tietelbaum dated 27th September, 2005 stateing that the contract was void and that all attemots should be made ot obtain the the £126,000 back form the council and the £20,000 back from Denniss Matthews. There wa sno issue about getting the £20,000 back from Denniss Matthews, it was just amatter of transfereing the funds to another of of the Fineland Property transactions Denniss Matthews was handling for Fineland and Nathan Tietelbaum, howeve rthe council rfefused ot return the £126,000 and Dennis Matthew and IWG continued to jointly try and obtain this £126,000 back from the Sutton council and then the council continuely refused a joint decision as made by solicitors Denniss Mathews, Ingram Winter Green and Bude Nathan Iwanier and Nathan Tietelbaum and his Fineland Group of companies to threaten, push sue etc Janice Pritcard and Robert Carter to vacante the property at 1 Garratt Close Beddington, Surrey instead of suing the Surtton council for the £126,000 back
Also see article dated 13th October 2002 in the Sunday Mirrow entitles Landlords in £10million Right to Buy Scam
They lure council tenants with £15K payouts—masterminds behind £30 million council home rip off….housing experts fear many will fritter away the cash and be forced into expensive private rental sector… with most back being support with a bed sit paid by the council with the money going to private landlords who have brought the home of the council..who have to pay the new landlords very high commercial rent to re-house the same council tenants that sold their like tenancies worth over £1 million to then for £15,000 to £20,000….”
Filed for Claimants in HC11C00580


HC11C00580 Pritchard and Ors v Tietelbaum and Ors
 Attention:
 rcjchancery.judgeslistings@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk
ccSimon Jackson <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>,
Francis Bacon <francis.bacon@hailshamchambers.com>,
"Watson, Heather (HMCS-RCJ, RCJ-Chancery)" <heather.watson@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
Sophie Ruffles <SRuffles@blg.co.uk>,
Tony Nurse-Marsh <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>,
Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,
geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk,
info@iwg.co.uk,
JKandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>
 
Please note the film being made called
 
Nighmare in Garratt Close
 
Staring
High Court of Justice-Judge Paul Morgan
Jonathan Barry Kandler
Nathan Tietelbaun.
Bude Nathan Iwanier Attorneys
Marie Clair Bleasdale Barrister
and others
the real  names have kept to expose the guilty
 
Yours Faithfully
IN
INL News Group
 
Urgent Attention:
Submissions of behalf of Defendant in HC06C03629
 
Francis Bacon <francis.bacon@hailshamchambers.com>,  Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,  "Watson,  Heather (HMCS-RCJ,  RCJ-Chancery)" <heather.watson@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,  Simon Jackson <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>,  JKandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>,  geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk,  "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,  Tony Nurse-Marsh <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>,  Sophie Ruffles <SRuffles@blg.co.uk>,  admin@jamison.biz,  admin@inlnews.com,  suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
 Please note article published on the world internet
http://awn.bz/CorruptHighCourtJudges.html
 
 Morgan J of the High Court of Justice in london has be voted the most corrupt judge in english leghal history by the INL News Legal investigative team 
Please see Australian Weekend News
awn.bz
here
 
 to read the full story
Being Fineland Investments Limited Claimant v Janice Vivien Pritchard Defendant in opposition for Injunction application dated 12th May, 2011 and in support of Morgan J setting aside his own orders made the 12th May, 2011 in HC06C02639
1.                   Morgan J must immediately set aside his own orders made 12th May, 2011 because of the facts
listed below in items (a) to (e).
(a)    The statements submitted by the claimant are based on evidence that does not exist such as the so-called non-existent witness statement of Mr JB Kandler that was meant to be dated 12th May, 2011.  The two orders made by Morgan J in HC06C02639 dated the 12th May, 2011 were both according to Morgan J’s signed and sealed orders, based “UPON reading the draft application notice and witness statements of Mr KB Kandler and Mrs TJ Wright both dated 12th May, 2011”. The only witness statements that were provided by  Mr JB Kandler of Bude Nathan Iwanier solicitors in support of the orders sought by Fineland Investments Limited before Morgan J on the 12th May, 2011 were two witness statements by Mr Nathan Tietelbaun which was dated May, 2011 but had no actual day of signing such statement and by Ms Tracey Julia Wright, the head of property and security services for Sherforce Limited dated the 12th May, 2011 and their enforcement services section Sherbond.
(b)   The two statements of Mr Nathan Tietelbaun and Mrs TJ Wright that were provided to Morgan J on the 12th May 2011 were full of false and misleading information and facts that have been deliberately wrongly assumed and/or deliberately just made up and not based on any real provable evidence against the defendant
(i)                  The  was no breaking and entering of the property by the Defendant at any time
 
(ii)                The defendant never took possession of the property as it was the caretaker for
Mr.Carew-Reid the new owner of the property that took possession of the property and Mr Carew-Reid is not a party to this action HC06C02639, so no orders made in this action HC06C02639 can be binding and/or enforceable on Mr Carew-Reid
 
(iii)               The caretaker for Mr Carew-Reid the new owner of the property that took possession of
the property at about 6pm on Monday the 9th may, 2011, not 5am as deliberately falsely stated in the statements of truth filed by the claimant
 
(iv)              The defendant never had possession of any keys to the property after the 1st April, 2011
 
(v)    Any attendance of the property by the defendant from the 9th May 2011 onwards would
have only been on the invitation of Mr Carew-Reid who claimed to the Defendant that the claimant’s representatives had given him possession of the property and they had willingly given up the legal fight for possession of the property and not in any way in the defendant’s personal capacity as claiming possession of the property
 
(c)    As the order were based on only one statement by Mrs TJ Wright, and the statement of Mr JB Kandler  simply does not even exist, so the mention of it is a deliberate false claim and statement signed by a Judge of the high Court of Justice in the Chancery Division and sealed for and on behalf of the Lord Chancellor of the High Court of Justice the Honourable Kenneth Clerk QC.  The statement of Mrs TJ Wright is not enough to support the initial orders of restitution and the other orders granted by Morgan J at the urgent exparte hearing without notice heard at 1.45 pm during Morgan J’s lunch hour as a special favour for powerful barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale, powerful Mr JB Kandler and his well connected and powerful legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier and their even more powerful clients Nathan Tietelbaum and his company Fineland Investments Limited under instructions from the Lord Chancellor of the High Court of Justice Kenneth Clerk.
 
(d)   Because of the misleading statements made in the claimant’s submission the court is
requested to award costs and damages in favour of the defendant and her agent
Mr. John Carew-Reid
 
2.                   Statement by Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale in her skeleton argument dated  14th May, 2011 but emailed to johncarewreid@gmail.com the 15h May, 2011 is a deliberate distortion if the truth. Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale’s skeleton argument dated  14th May, 2011 is meant to be a true summary of the facts sworn to by the witnesses. The witness Mr Nathan Tietelbaum in his statement dated May, 2011 (no actual day date) only states that the next door neighbour  Linda McIntyre, who lives at 2 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, told him “the defendant had moved back into the Property” and does not mention that there was any break in.
3.                   It is completely denied that anyone broke into the property and in fact none of the witness statements state there was a break in. In fact all the witness statements produced in support of the Claimant’s order indicated that in fact there was no break-in and that in fact the way the bearded man must have entered the property was having the keys handed to him and thus there was no need for anyone to break in, and in fact the locks were changed with permission from Sherforce and while Sherforce were in attendance at the property.  This is a deliberate attempt by a Barrister to misrepresent the truth to the court and is a clear contempt of court by Barrister  Marie Claire Bleasdale.
4.                   It is completely denied by the Defendant that she or anyone else she knew was involved in anyway in any break in of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 or any other date and there is no evidence whatsoever presented to the court that the defendant and/or anyone else the Defendant knows  was involved with any break in of at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 or any other date.
5.       The Defendant denies to have taken possession of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 or any other date since being evicted by representatives of the Claimant on 1st April, 2011.
6.       As far as the Defendant is aware and understands that it was a person whom she knows a ‘Rob of the Little Family’ who took possession of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 at around 6pm under the authority of Mr John Carew-Reid who claims to be the new legal owner of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey who the Defendant believed was handed legal possession of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 201 by authority of the claimant’s representative by being handed the keys to the property in the afternoon of the 9th May, 2011.
7.       It is the Defendants belief that the keys to the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 from an representative of the claimant based on barristers Marie Claire Bleasdale’s  submission on the 13th April, 2011 to Morgan J that Mr Carew-Reid’s prior claim dated the 4th June, 2004 to the property  was legally correct in that Mr Carew-Reid’s agreement with Mrs Janice Vivien Pritchard dated the 4th June, 2004 to purchase Mrs Pritchard’s right and interests in at I Garratt Close, Beddington, is a clear legal prior claim to the ownership of the property rather than the Claimant’s purported contract dated 9th August, 2011. It was understood by the Defendant that the Claimant’s representatives had realized  there was no need to continue the legal fight and had willingly handed  over possession of the property at at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 to Mr Carew-Reid. Any attendance at the property by the defendant from 6pm the 9th May, 2011 onwards and any letters handed to the next door neighbour about the cutting of trees would have been done on instructions of Mr Carew-Reid as the new owner of the property, and not done under the Defendants’ own authority. The Claimants and it’s legal representatives in including barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale and her instructing solicitors Mr JB Kandler and his legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier and the Morgan J all aware of the written statements of truth filed by Mr Carew-Reid that Mr cardew-Redi has appointed Janice Vivien Pritchard and her son Robert carter as life time caretakers of the property on his behalf and thus any actions the Defendant has taken in relation to attending the property and/or protecting the property, and/or maintenance of the property has been done in the Defendant’s capacity as caretaker of the property on behalf of Mr Carew-Reid and not on the Defendants own behalf.
8.       Keys were used in a legitimate way by Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker Rob of the Little Family to enter the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Monday the 9th May, 2011 at about 6pm to open the door of the property.
9.       The Defendant denies that the time of entry to the property was 5am on Monday morning the 9th May, 2011. In fact as far as the defendant has been told by Rob of the Little Family, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey that the date of entry of the property was around 6pm Monday the 9th May, 2011. This can be verified by Sutton Police Records. The Defendant maintains that the truth of the matter is that only under instructions by Mr Carew-Reid, ‘Rob of the Little Family’  who was given the keys entered the property at about 6pm on Monday 9th May, 2011 and was keen to have the police come around to further the police crime report number CAD 363 on behalf of the Claimant sin HC11C00580 for things that were stolen by the claimant Fineland Investments Limited  in HC06C02639 and /or Nathan Tietelbaum   and/or the claimant’s other representatives, agents, servants or otherwise during the period of the 1st April, 2011 and the 6th May, 2011. So when the next door neighbor Linda McIntyre under instructions from her boss Nathan Tietelbaum rang the police to try and convince the police to have ‘Rob of the Little Family’, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey arrested by the police for being on unlawfully on the premises, Rob of the Little Family, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey was very pleased to see the police arrive. The Defendant clearly maintains as an undisputable fact that Rob of the Little Family, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, went outside and met the police and spoke to the police at length and after about an hour and a half after the police did all their normal enquiries and checking shook the hand of Rob of the Little Family, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, saying they agreed that this was a civil matter and had no rightful police authority to take any action against ‘Rob of the Little Family’, Mr Carew-Reid’s other caretaker of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey for being in possession of the property at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey as a caretaker  for the new owner Mr John Carew-Reid.
10.   The Defendant Mrs Janice Vivien Pritchard denies she was at any time on or after 6pm on the 9th May, 2011 intending, or did return to the house at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey to live at the house as she was already been re-housed by Social Security with alternative accommodation after spending a couple of days homeless when the Defendant , her son and Mr Carew-Reid were evicted from  I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey by the Claimant in HC06C02639 and/or its appointed agents, servants, representatives or otherwise on the 1st April, 2011. Any attendance the Defendant had at I Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on or after 6pm on the 9th May, 2011was only to show the new caretaker appointed by the new registered owner Mr John Carew-Reid the various house facilities and house they work etc.
11.   The timing of the emergency hearing at 1.45pm without adequate notice and the exparte orders granted by Morgan J to grant “the Claimant permission to issue a writ of restitution to enforce the possession order made in these proceedings on 31.01.2011”  is unprecedented in English law and is not in accordance with the Magna Carta 1297, clause XXIX Administration of Justice which says  “ No Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be desiesed of his freehold but by lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land. Wel sell to no man, we will not deny or defer to any man either justice or right”  In modern times the word man applies to woman.
12.   The defendant does not admit that the person Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale refers to in a statement by the next door neighbour who lives at 2 Garratt Close, Beddington, Linda McIntyre has made, that has not been served on the defendant and/or Mr Carew-Reid who has been given leave by Briggs J to represent the defendant Mrs Janice Vivien Pritchard in HC06C02639,  was at any time a squatter. In fact as far as defendant is aware, the person she suspects is in the photo was at the property as a caretaker for Mr John Carew-Reid the rightful new registered owner. However, regardless if this person is deemed and/or accused by the court and/or the claimant and/or the claimant’s representatives to be a squatter, and/or a representative of Mr Carew-Reid, there is no way this person is acting under any orders and/or instructions of the Defendant Mrs Janice Vivien Pritchard.
13.   The Defendant denies that the Bailiffs acted correctly in removing the caretaker appointed by the rightful registered owner of the property being Mr Carew-Reid because among other reasons: (a) they could not have obtained a writ possession in the time available by the morning of the 13th May, 2011 (b) they removed the caretaker without showing any evidence of any writ of possession and in fact showed the caretaker no paperwork from the court whatsoever, and in fact no paper work whatsoever before forcibly removing the caretaker at about 11am on the 13th May, 2001 after drilling the old locks out and placing new locks into the doors of the property.
14.   It is also noted that it is rather odd that after the claimant’s witness Tracey Julia Wright in her statement dated 12th May, 2011 stated in paragraph 11 “when the locks had been changed one set was given to the man who was in occupation on site for the claimant who Mr Bushnell believes was Czechoslovakian. The other set of keys was retained by the locksmith….” Then why would there be any need to apply for a new writ of possession and/or forcibly break into the property by drilling out the new old locks and placing new locks into the property.  Why didn’t the representative of the Claimant who had a set of keys simply just use his keys to enter the property at anytime he liked on behalf of the Claimant. In fact the statement of the claimant’s witness Tracey Julia Wright goes on to say…” Mr Bushnell and Mr Ferrier left the property at 18.00 hours. Mr Bushnell’s recollection is that when he left, the Defendant and her son were outside the property with the boxes of goods. And the Czechoslovakian man remained in the Property…” This Czechoslovakian man was left inside the property and had a copy of the new keys, and obviously had orders by the claimant and/or by one of the claimant’s appointed representatives to vacate the property and allow Mr Carew-Reid and his appointed representatives to take possession of the property. The Claimants own witnesses, clearly admit willingly vacating the property and allowing the locks to be changed and allowed the new registered owner Mr John Carew-Reid to have himself and/or his appointed representatives to  take lawful possession of the property at around 6pm on Monday 9th May, 2011 and allowed Mr Carew-Reid and/or his appointed representatives stay in lawful possession until the 12th May, 2011 without any complaint to either the occupiers of the property and/or the courts. The claimants have therefore in law deemed to have willingly vacated the property  and handed over legal possession of the property to Mr Carew-Reid on the 9th May, 2011.
15.   The evidence is clear that this whole thing now seems that the Claimants application and orders sought and obtained on the 12th May, 2011 is a very devious and well planned fraud on the Court and on the Defendant in HC06C02639 with no legal and/or factual basis whatsoever, and in fact seems to have been planned to try and set up the defendant is a very devious and deliberate way using a lot of false and misleading facts and information being presented to the court by the claimants and the claimant’s agents, representatives, servants including the claimant’s legal representatives to try and obtain the orders sought on the 12th May, 2011 form Morgan J at a hearing without proper notice falsely pretending to Morgan J that there was some urgency about needing to have the hearing without notice and without having to serve the defendant the application and/or any of the supporting statements in support of the application.
16.   The Defendant denies that that the caretaker appointed by Mr Carew-Reid was offering any resistance to the baillifs and was courteous at all times to them even after being threatened by the  enforcement officer Mr Stephen Ferrier that he would smash his head against a steel garage door if he did not leave the property and the street immediately. Mr Carew-Reid’s caretaker was quite willing to leave once he was shown a court enforcement writ of possession that shows that he should leave pursuant to a court order issued against him.
17.   The Defendant claims that the bailiffs action was not in accordance with normal legal requirements. The bailiffs and enforcement officers wrongly and illegally threatened the caretaker with violence and also breached confidentiality by discussing the matter with the next door neighbor Linda McIntyre.
18.   Mr Nathan Tietelbaum’s statement also showed court disrespect by discussing the matter with Ms Linda McIntyre. A High Court case is a confidential matter between the claimants and the defendants and is not a subject that is propper to make into neighbourhood gossip and is none of the neighbour’s business. It is clear that there is a business relationship between the next door neighbor Ms Linda McIntyre, which actually was admitted by Linda McIntyre to the Defendant some time ago when Linda McIntyre bragged she was working for a powerful property investor Nathan Tietelbaum and also admitted to Mr John Carew-Reid that she was working for Natham Tietelbaum and that she was fully protected from any criminal investigations and/or complaints to the local council, as she said that Mr Natham Tietelbaum was that powerful he has the local Sutton council, the police, politicians and certain judges such as Morgan J  in the courts under his payroll.
19.   Ms Linda McIntyre was heard by two different witnesses to be libeling Mrs Vivien Pritchard by calling her crazy. The defendant refers to the recent chancery judgment given by Mr Justice Eady in a libel case where a neighbour was called a perv and an order was given for 1,600 pounds damages and costs against the defendant who committed the libel.
20.   The defendant denies that all statements were received by Mr Carew-Reid, quite contrary to Briggs J’s order that Mr Carew-Reid could appear at any subsequent hearing and was also an interested party in any proceedings concerning 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey. By 12 noon on Monday 16th May 2011 no posted court notices have been received by Mr Carew-Reid or by the defendant.
 
The Defendant has pointed out a mass of false and/or misleading statements in the dated May 2011 being statement of truth signed by Nathan Tietelbaun and the statement of truth dated the 12th May, 2011 signed by Tracy Julia Wright who is head of property and security services for Shergroup Limited who has claims to have been responcible for the day to day management of the eviction process in the proceedings HC06C02639 against Janice Vivien Pritchard, and has been instructed by Bude Natham Iwanier Attorneys, who instructed Sherbond (who are the enforcement services section of Shergroup) to have herself along with two other Sherbond employees Mr Richard Bushnell and Mr Stephen Ferrier to attend 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, CR0 4PW on 1st April, 2011, 6th May, 2011 and 13th May 2011.
In these statements a lot of third hand false and/or misleading information provied by the next dorr nieghbour Linda who has admitted to Janice Pritchard and Mr Carew-Reid as being in the payroll of Natham Tietelbaum ( who himself has admitted in his statement that he regularily obtains information form Linda the next dorr neighbour) has been supplied to Morgan J to convince Morgan J to signed and sealed two quite clearly fraudulent High Court orders in HC06C02639 dated the 12th May, 2011 under direct instructions to do so my the Chancellor of the High Court Kenneth Clerk.
Morgan J who has been personally appointed by Chancellor of the High Court Kenneth Clerk as the only judge that is allowed to deal with the two court actions HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 from now on, even for set adie and appeal applications, has no choice but to adjourn the application for an injunction to a special appointment for hearing for at least two days,to be issued against Janice Vivien Pritchard made by barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale, Jonathan Barry Kandler on behalf of attorneys Bude Natham Iwanier, Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and his attorney firm Ingram Winter Green, Sophie Ruffles and Barrister Francis Bacon and their legal firm Barlow Lyde Gilbert and Simon Jackson and his attorney firm Finsbury and Fineland Investments Limited, and at such hearing the following will have to orderd by the coiurt to be put on the witness stand for cross examination on their witness statements and/or to inform the court everything they knpw about this matter:

1. Attorney Jonathan Barry Kandler
2. Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale
3. Attorney Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
4. Attorney Sofie Ruffles
5. Nathan Tietelbaum
6. Linda ( next door neighbour living at 2 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey) who is in the payroll of Nathan Tietelbaum and who has supllied a lot of false information to Nathan Tietelbaum to place in Nathan Tietelbaum.
7. The four other young men who also live in Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey who also are in the payroll of Nathan Tietelbaum to make violent threats to Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter, Mr Carew-Reid and anyone else that looks like being connected with either of Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and/or Mr Carew-Reid.
8. Tracy Julia Wright who is head of property and security services for Shergroup Limited
9. Sherbond employee/agent Mr Richard Bushnell.
10. Sherbond employee/agent Mr Stephen Ferrier.
11. The two police officers who attended 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey at  5pm to 7pm on Monday the 9th May, 2011 as a result of Nathan Tietelbaun getting the next door neighbour at 2 Garratt Close, Linda to ring the local Sutton London Met Police to try and have Mr Carew-Reid arrested for being at the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, after Nathan Tietelbaum originally organising for Mr Carew-Reid to be given the key of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington through his agent Joseph on Monday the 9th April, 2011and telling Mr Carew-Reid that all the security people had been removed from the property, the locks have been changed and Mr Carew-Reid was free to move into the property and take full possession of the propery and all objections to Mr Carew-Reid's transfer with the titles office of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington by Fineland Investments Limited's attorney's willl be withdrawn by Ingram Winter Green.
12. The Police reports and files that attended 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey at  5pm to 7pm on Monday the 9th May, 2011 as a result of Nathan Tietelbaun getting the next door neighbour at 2 Garratt Close, Linda to ring the local Sutton London Met Police to try and have Mr Carew-Reid arrested for being at the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, will have to be ordered to be brouhgt into the court fo examination by the court.
13. The four London Met police officers in two Met Police Squad care that attended 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Friday afternoon the 13th April, 2011 on orders of Nathan Tietelbaun to threaten, intimidate and/or scare Mr Carew-Reid's caretaker Robert of the Little Family and others will have to be ordered to attend this court hearing for cross examination and be alos ordered to bring all their police reocrds and reports associated with their attendance at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on Friday afternoon the 13th April, 2011 on orders of Nathan Tietelbaun.
14. Morgan J on behalf of High Court will have to order all London Met Police records from the 1st Apri, 2011 until the 17th May, 2011concerning anything that has to do with the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey.

Tex messages dated 15th may, 2011 from Janice Pritchard settng you important information relavent to the injunction application issued by the Claimants Fineland Investments Limited controlled soley by Nathan Tielelbaum in HC06C02639 on behalf of his  solicitors and barrister Marie Claire Beasdale, and solcitors Jonathan Barry Kandler and theer legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier

" I can’t deal with all the hatred and abuse against me.  Anymore. I can’t cope anymore. I have not being able to cope for sometime now, and have since July 2004 when I was first threatened with physical violence against me and my son Robert by Nathan Tietelbaum that if I did not sign the papers that Nigel, Matthews and his solicitor firm Denniss Matthews where trying to force me to sign in July, 2004. I did not want to sign them as I did not want to have anything to do with Nathan Tietelbaum and his gang of what I am told is a very powerful gang called the London Jewish Mafia who would have no hesitation of carrying out their threats to kill my son if I did not sign the documents that they told  Denniss Matthews to get me to sign. I signed these documents without reading them and signed them because I was too scared not to sign them because if I did not sign them I believed that my son Robert Carter would be killed under orders of Nathan Tietelbaum whom I was told has had many people ordered to be murdered and or physically harmed in difference ways like having their knees capped with a sludge hammer, or having one of their fingers cut off etc. I was also told that if I ever spoke about these threats of violence by Nathan Tietelbaum to anyone, then my son will be murdered. John, I was in a very difficult situation having already signed an agreement with yourself to sell you all my rights and entitlements to 1 Garratt Close, Beddington on the 4TH June,, 2004, I now had threats of having my son murdered by Nathan Tietelbaum’s gang called the London Jewish Mafia if I did not sign the documents he wanted me to sign that he had given to Denniss Matthews Solicitors for me to sign. I was also told that it was no good going to the police to complain about these threats of the murder of my son and/or other physical types harm to my son Robert, because I was told that Nathan Tietelbaum and his other even more powerful connections of people he works for and with control and pay the police as they are all senior Freemasons and/or jewish and in fact they  have enough senior and lower ranked police that are all part of their London Jewish/Freemason Mafia gang that any complaints to the police will be covered up and the fact that I have told the police about the threats will get back to Nathan Tietelbaum and his the other members of the London Jewish Mafia and that will cause the Nathan Tietelbaum to carry out his threats to have my son murdered and/or some other serious physical harm done to my son Robert Carter. I was told that did does not matter what crime Nathan Tietelbaum and any members of his London Jewish Mafia gang commit including murder, that there will never be any serious police investigation into any of then as they are all completely protected by people as senior as the head of the London Met Police, the Mayor of London, the prime minister of the United Kingdom, the Lord Chancellor of the High Court who also are far to scared not to do what they are told because they too are frightened of physical violence against their family members by those even more powerful people in the shadows whom Nathan Tietelbaum and all of them work for,  that never get named or exposed, charged or prosecuted in any way because the powerful people in the shadows effectively control the whole legal, political, banking and financial system and have trillions of pounds in assets behind them, have large violent criminal networks working form them that control their illegal drug, prostitution, human slavery operations etc and can have anyone just disappear without a trace and without fear of any investigation and/or prosecution including having prime ministers, presidents etc and their families killed and/or harmed in anyway they like. I am told these people recently had the leader of Hamus murdered by the world Jewish Mafia using Mossad Agents using false Australian and United Kingdom passports and this matter was never seriously investigated by any Government and/or police organization and they simply got away with the open and blatant murder of apolitical leader. So what chance would I and my son Robert Carter have against the criminal gang that I believe are called the London Jewish Mafia.
John I can not cope anymore with all this.. I may have to end my life to escape from all this.. but I am scared of what will happen to my son Robert. Who will take care of Robert if I end my life right now… otherwise I would…right now end my life. Why doesn’t all this stop? What have I done? I’ve had enough of this life. Each day gets worse. Nathan Tietelbaum, solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler, Sherwins and Sherforce, Justice Morgan, the Chancellor Kenneth Clerk, solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Solicitors Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and his legal firm Ingram Winter Green, Nigel Matthews and his legal firm Solicitors Denniss Mathews, Solicitors Barlow Lyde Gilbert, Barrister Marie Clare Bleasdale, barrister Francis Bacon, Simon Jackson and his legal firm Finsbury, the whole criminal network of the London Jewish Mafia which has a large gang of violent Hungarian Criminals run by their head man Joseph who reports personally to  Natham Tietelbaun, my next door neighbor Linda who has bragged to me that she and another gangs of boys living in other council houses in Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey have for years been personally employed by Nathan Tietelbaum to harass and threaten and blacken my name and my son Robert Carter and now anyone else that is seen to be associated to me, and/or helping me in any way to obtain my things from the house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington and or are seen in any way to be trying to protect mine or my son Robert carter’s interests in any way. John Your life is now in danger. I did not want to have to tell you all this and I am sorry you ever got to know me in 2004 at our chance meeting at an art gallery in London, and you then agreed to purchase all my rights and interests in my right to buy and my life tenancy of my council house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey. But I have to know tell you the whole story and my advice to you is to get away from these dangerous people as soon as possible and stay as far away from them as you can.. they are protected by corrupt judges, magistrates, politicians, police, bailiffs, bankers, financiers, violent criminal Hungarian gangs ..these people are untouchable and can get away with murder without any fear whatsoever..they are likely to already have a contract out on your life already… I am sure of that…These wnt you and Robert dead and now also want you dead….for standing up for me and Robert..John you are in great danger now.. all because of me…These people think I am not Human… They make me feel I am not Human…I am not human..an I? I am ad my son Robert now beggers on the street with nowhere to live….now Jonathan Barry Kandler and his legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier and Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and his legal firm Ingram Winter Green and Sally Ruffles and Francis Bacon and their legal firm Barlow Lyde and Gilbert and Simon Jackson and his legal firm Finsbury have organised someone to speak to the people in charge of my temporary council accommodation and have told them a lots of lies so that I have now been thrown out of the temporary accommodation that was provided to me a couple of days after being homeless on the 1st April, 2011 for a few days after myself and my son Robert Carter were forcably removed by Sherwins and the London Met Police acting on behalf and instructions of Jonathan Barry Kandler and his legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier and Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and his legal firm Ingram Winter Green and Sally Ruffles and Francis Bacon and their legal firm Barlow Lyde and Gilbert and Simon Jackson and his legal firm Finsbury
I am now a begger and a piece of crap for all to see. What’s the point of living any more."
 
 "I was told Natham Tietelbaum is the head of one of the powerful violent criminal networks in London  and has a violent criminal Hungarian Gang ready to carry our his violent orders at any time headed by a man whom is known as Joseph. Previously to all these threats of violence from Natham Tietelbaum and his violent criminal gang which started in July 2004 against me and my son if I did not sign papers with Denniss Matthews Solicitors signing my rights away to my home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey to Nathan Tietelbaum’s company Fineland Investments Limited which is also connected to his other companies Fineland Properties Limited and Nothern Holdings Limited, I had to endure year of fear form violent threats from my son’s father who constantly threatened my with knives and guns. I am a person who has been living in constant fear for over 20 years, first from the father of my son and then starting in July 2004 from Natham Tietelbaum and his violent Criminal Gang which I believe is commonly known as the London Jewish Mafia who are even more powerful because they all are Freemasons who are well known as the most powerful organization in the world who were responsible for the Jack The Ripper killings in White Chapel with 90% of judges, magistrates, senior  and many lower ranking police, 90% of senior politicians, 90% of senior bankers and successful businessmen. 90% of mayor of local council and other male clerical staff in Local Councils in London and the United Kingdom, being Freemasons. It is well known that Freemasons have to protect their own and under their Freemason oath have to at all times regardless if they breach their other oaths and duties in their official office they work for, and thus will act in an illegal, wrongful and/or immoral way in their normal duties as a judge, police officer, council employee, council mayor, banker, financier, politician etc if they have to do so to protect the interests of fellow Freemasons.
I was also told by Nigel Matthews of Denniss Mathews solicitors, that there was no need for me to read the documents I was signing because they were fair and reasonable and there was nothing in them that was not in my interest and that I would not have to leave my home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington until the title deed of the property was transferred into the name of Fineland Investments Limited at land registry and I was handed the 20,000 pounds as soon as I had signed the documents, but not have to leave the property until the title deed of the property was actually formally transferred into the name of Fineland Investments Limited which I was told would take at least three to four years, and this  I had plenty of time to organize myself and my son into alternative accommodation and purchase another place in France as I was planning to do and would have immediately had the 20,000 pounds in cash to do so in August 2004 and would be able to get as far away as possible from Nathan Tietelbaun and his criminal gang commonly known as the London Jewish Mafia, and star a new life.
The homeless unit has been in discussion with Jonathan Barry Kandler and his legal firm Bude, Nathan Iwanier, but refuse to talk to me. That’s why Robert and me have been thrown out of the temporary accommodation the council provided after being a few days in the street after we were thrown out on the street on the 1st April, 2011 by Nathan Tietelbaum, Fineland Investment Limited, Jonathan Barry Kandler, Daniel Jacob Ginsbury and their legal firms Bude Nathan Iwanier and Ingram Winter Green from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, without any warning on a Friday afternoon, without any of our possessions, personal toiletaries, spare underwear, ID, money etc.. just the cloths we walked out with when we were thrown out."
The defendant requests the immediate resignation of organ J form this case and as a judge of the High Court of justice, the Strand London United Kingdom after being voted by the INL News’ International legal Investigative Team as the most corrupt and incompetent Judge in all the English Court System.
Janice Prichard the defendant ha s a doctors certificate that she is too depressed to attend any court hearings for a long time.
 As a result of the illegal and wrongful and immoral actions that have been done against her and her son Robert carter by the Claimants Fineland Investments Limited and its director Powerful Jewish Investor Nathan Tietelbaum and his legal, police and other enforcement associates and representatives who will stop at nothing to destroy the defendant Janice Pritchard and her son Robert Carter
 Signed by   Defendant Janice Vivien PritchardDated 17th May 2011
 
From Press Bureau at New Scotland Yard - last updated Wed 23/3/11 16:26 
(
Please refresh the page to ensure you see the latest update)
Telephone: 020 7230 2171
JAIL FOR DRUGS, THEFT AND CORRUPTION
Images are available.
A prisoner who ran a criminal empire from his cell, dealing in drugs and the theft and ringing of luxury cars, after corrupting a prison officer, a police constable and a member of police staff has today, Wednesday 23 March 2011, been jailed alongside those who helped him.
Robert Talbot, 33yrs, [Date of birth 17.06.77], of no fixed abode, was jailed for 12 years at Southwark Crown Court following an investigation by the Met's Anti Corruption Command.
The investigation uncovered that Talbot:
Corrupted HM Wandsworth prison officer Ian Cooper to smuggle mobile phones and drugs into prison hidden in large cartons of orange juice.
Used an outside 'runner' Thomas King to handle the theft and cloning of high value vehicles totalling £500,000.
Encouraged Cooper to corrupt his partner, MPS Police Constable Hayley Cloud, to carry out vehicle checks on cars he could 'ring'.
Instructed MPS staff member Natalie Ricketts, corrupted by Cloud, to unlawfully authorise the release of a seized Lamborghini from an MPS car pound.
Ordered that checks be carried out on criminal associates, including checks made on behalf of associate Stephen Palmer.
Talbot was jailed today alongside:
= Ian Cooper, 35yrs [Date of birth 02.01.76] - jailed for five and a half years
= Thomas King, 27yrs [Date of birth 12.05.83] of Sutton at Hone, Kent - jailed for four years
= Natalie Ricketts, 28yrs [Date of birth 16.03.83] - 10 month suspended sentence.
= Stephen Palmer, 28yrs [14.09.82] of Temple Road Croyden - jailed for 12 months
= Hayley Cloud, 28 yrs [Date of birth 10.12.82] was also jailed for two years on 17 June 2010.
Carl Bussey, Acting Commander of the Met's Directorate of Professional Standards said: "Today's jail sentences should serve as a stark warning that the MPS will root out and deal robustly with police officers and staff who engage in corrupt activities, and also with those that corrupt them.
"There is no place for the likes of Ricketts or Cloud in our organisation and they no longer work for the MPS.
"This has been a significant and complex investigation with officers from the Met's Anti Corruption Command working closely with the London Prison Anti-Corruption Team, her Majesty's Prison Service, and the Met's Stolen Vehicle Unit.
"Be assured, the Directorate of Professional Standards works to ensure the small number of officers and staff who do not meet the very highest standards of professionalism and integrity expected are identified and dealt with so that Londoners can have confidence in their police service."
A Prison Service spokesperson said: "The vast majority of prison service staff are decent, hard working, professional people.
"There is no place for corrupt members of staff within the Prison Service and we deal with them in a robust manner. 
We do all we can to ensure that corrupt staff are identified, prosecuted and brought to justice through close working with the police. We will always press for the strongest charges to be laid. The prosecution of Ian Cooper demonstrates our commitment to root out corruption."
Background
On 6 May 2009, officers from the Met's Anti Corruption Command arrested 12 people following a series of early-morning raids at 14 locations in south east London, during which officers seized vehicle documentation, computers and mobile phones for examination.
The intelligence led operation was carried out by members of the Anti-Corruption Command, in conjunction with officers from the London Prison Anti-Corruption Team and the Met's Stolen Vehicle Unit.
The arrests followed an investigation, which began in October 2008, into a network of individuals believed to be involved in the theft and ringing of high value cars and the supply of controlled drugs to prison inmates.
The investigation uncovered that the 'ringleader' of this network was Robert Talbot, who was running operations from his cell at HMP Wandsworth [later at HMP Coldingley, Surrey] after corrupting prison officer Ian Cooper.
Cooper provided Talbot with mobile phones and facilitated the smuggling of drugs and other contraband into the prison system, on occasions hidden within large cartons of orange juice.
The other side of Talbot's business, the theft and ringing of luxury cars, was run with the assistance of Thomas King, a 'runner' on the outside who also acted as a go between to supply contraband to Cooper. A police search of King's address revealed a package containing heroin, cocaine and cannabis worth a total of £22,000. The package was believed to be headed for the prison system.
Vehicles stolen included high value Porches, Mercedes, BMWs and Range Rovers totalling £500,000. They were taken from driveways of homes in south east London and the Home Counties.
To 'clone' the vehicles, Cooper corrupted his partner Hayley Cloud, who was then a serving MPS officer based at Lewisham Borough, to carry out unauthorised vehicle checks on police databases.
Talbot would then obtain log books from identical vehicles to those stolen, allowing the vehicle to receive a cloned identity before being sold on to innocent purchasers.
On one occasion, on Talbot's instruction, Cloud also unlawfully authorised the release of a Lamborghini Gallardo from an MPS car pound in south east London and arranged for the vehicle to be picked up by King. The vehicle had previously been seized by police as part of a criminal investigation.
Cloud went on to corrupt her friend Natalie Ricketts, a MPS member of staff based at Bexley borough.
The pair would also carry out checks on Talbot's criminal associates, including checks made on behalf of Stephen Palmer to find out whether he was wanted by police.
Ricketts also stole police radios from Bexleyheath Police Station and passed them to Cloud for the groups use.
Talbot, Cooper, King, Cloud and Ricketts were arrested during the raids on 6 May 2009.
Palmer was identified and arrested at a later date.
All six were subsequently charged with and dealt with as follows:
1] Robert Talbot jailed for a total of 12 years after previously pleading guilty to:
= Conspiracy to bring or otherwise convey prohibited articles into prison- sentenced to five years imprisonment to be served consecutively
= Conspiracy to steal- sentenced to five years imprisonment to be served consecutively
= Two counts of conspiracy to cause misconduct in a public office- sentenced to two years for each count to be served concurrently to each other but consecutively to each of the five year sentences.
2] Ian Cooper jailed for a total of five and a half years after previously pleading guilty to:
= Two counts of conspiracy to cause misconduct in a public office and handling stolen goods- sentenced to four and a half years for each count to be served concurrently to each other and consecutively to; 
= 12 month sentence for handling stolen goods
3] Thomas King, jailed for four years after previously pleading guilty to:
= Conspiracy to bring or otherwise convey prohibited items into prison- sentenced to four years imprisonment to be served consecutively
= Conspiracy to cause misconduct - sentenced to three years imprisonment to be served consecutively
= Conspiracy to steal - sentenced to three years imprisonment to be served consecutively
4] Natalie Ricketts received a 10 month suspended sentence for two years after previously pleading guilty to:
= Conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office
= theft
Ricketts resigned from the MPS in June 2009
5] Stephen Palmer jailed for 12 months after pleading guilty to:
= Encouraging or assisting an offender
6] Hayley Cloud jailed for two years on 17 June 2010 after pleading guilty to:
= theft
= Conspiracy to commit misconduct in a public office
= handling stolen goods
Following a fast track misconduct board, Cloud was dismissed from the MPS in April 2010.
+ On 17 August 2010, ten men were jailed for a total of more than 20 years at Croydon Crown Court after being convicted of stealing high value vehicles, 'ringing' them and then selling them on following an operation led by officers from Bromley Borough and the Met's Stolen Vehicle Unit.
These convictions are directly linked to the anti corruption investigation.
NOTES TO EDITORS: Pictures of Talbot, Cooper, King, Ricketts, Cloud and Palmer are available via the names highlighted in blue above or from Press Bureau. Please quote ref: 'Pics1' CO273-09 Talbot/Cooper/King/Ricketts/Cloud/Palmer

Met Police Apologise For Corrupt Investigation


The Metropolitan Police has made a public apology to the family of a man murdered in south east London 24 years ago after admitting corruption in the first investigation.
Thirty-seven year old private detective Daniel Morgan was found with an axe in his head in Sydenham in 1987.

Nobody has ever been convicted of murder and the latest of five inquiries collapsed at the beginning of March after 19 months.

Metropolitan Police acting commissioner Tim Godwin has admitted there were "failings" by officers, saying:

"I recognise how important this is to both you and your family and that this is acknowledged publicly.

"You are entitled to an apology, not only for this failure, but also for the repeated failure of the Metropolitan Police Service - my organisation - over many years following Daniel's murder to accept that corruption played such a part in failing to bring those responsible to justice."

His family have called for a full judicial inquiry.

What we have been required to endure has been nothing short of torture”
Statement from Daniel Morgan's family

Daniel Morgan's family said they had been "lied to, fobbed off, bullied and degraded" by Met officers
  • Anger over reggae singer's death
  • Reggae singer 'stabbed himself'
  • Reggae star dies in police raid






Daniel Morgan Port
























Daniel Morgan's family said they had been "lied to, fobbed off, bullied and

Metropolitan Police apology over Daniel

Morgan murder

Scotland Yard has apologised to the family of a private detective killed in south-east London in 1987, for a corrupt investigation into his death.
Daniel Morgan, 37, was found with an axe in his head in Sydenham but nobody has ever been convicted of murder.
Acting Commissioner Tim Godwin told a Metropolitan Police Authority (MPA) meeting "failings" by officers. The entire legal case collapsed this month.
Mr Morgan's family has called for a full judicial inquiry.
The father-of-two from Monmouthshire was found with an axe in his skull in a car park outside the Golden Lion pub.
Five people were arrested in 2008 but none was ever convicted.
The cost of the five police inquiries and subsequent legal hearings was estimated at about £30m.
'Repeated failure'
"I am deeply sorry that the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) has failed to bring to justice those responsible for the murder of Daniel," Mr Godwin has said in a letter to Mr Morgan's family.
"The MPS has accepted that police corruption in the original investigation was a significant factor in this failure."
The family was "entitled to an apology" for officers' "repeated failure" to acknowledge this corruption, he added.
"I am also very sorry that for many years your concerns regarding the failure of the MPS to bring those persons to justice were not properly addressed."
He acknowledged the family felt a "deep sense of loss, frustration, anger and distress".
Mr Morgan's relatives said in a statement that a judicial inquiry was "urgently required" as the initial police inquiry was "crippled" by corruption.
"Through two decades and more of public protests, meetings with police officers at the highest ranks, lobbying of politicians and pleas to the media, we have found ourselves lied to, fobbed off, bullied, degraded and let down time and time again.
"What we have been required to endure has been nothing short of torture."
Smiley Culture protest
Meanwhile the meeting descended into chaos when friends and relatives of a reggae singer who recently died during a police raid made a noisy interruption.
On 15 January singer Smiley Culture died of a single stab wound at his Surrey home.
An inquest has heard the wound was self-inflicted.
Asher Seator, his best friend, wept as he called for an inquiry.
He said: "No one is doing anything. What are you investigating?"
MPA member Cindy Butts was reduced to tears. She said: "It has been 30 years since the Brixton riots and so much has changed - [but] we have so much to do."

More on This Story

Related Stories

  • Anger over reggae singer's death 31 MARCH 2011, SURREY
  • Reggae singer 'stabbed himself' 18 MARCH 2011, ENGLAND
  • Reggae star dies in police raid 15 MARCH 2011, ENGLAND
  • Axe murder case folds 24 years on 11 MARCH 2011, LONDON
  • Timeline: Daniel Morgan axe murder 11 MARCH 2011, LONDON
  • Man cleared over 1987 axe murder 18 NOVEMBER 2010, SURREY
  • HM Courts Service
  • Crown Prosecution Service





31 March 2011
 


 
Submissions to Morgan J for 13th April 2011 for application in HC11C00580
 
Fax To: Court 19 Royal Court of Justice Chancery Division, the Stand London,
Heather Watson Asssociate of Morgan J for urgent attention of Morgan J
Tel: +44 (0) 2079476419 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 2079476419      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax: +44 (0) 207 947 6062
 
TO: "J Kandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>
"Hibbert, Nick" <N.Hibbert@kennedys-law.com>
 <johncarewreid@googlemail.com>, "Sophie Ruffles" <SRuffles@blg.co.uk>, "Jonathan Kandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, "Simon Jackson" <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>, "Mooney, Eamon" <E.Mooney@kennedys-law.com>Mendy Bude <aeb@bni.co.uk>, JKandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, Tony Nurse-Marsh <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>, sallylpalmer@gmail.com, geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk, admin@jamison.biz, david.rosen@inlnews.com
 
Re: HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division
Parties: Janice Vivien Pritchard and others
v
Nathan Tietelbaum, Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited, Nothern Holdings Limited Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors
 
Submissions to Morgan J for 13th April 2011 for application in HC11C00580
 
12th April, 2011
 
Attention:
Geraldine Paletz
Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors
 Solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler, Bude-Nathan-Iwanier Solicitors,
Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor,Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors, Solicitor Simon Jackson, Finburn LLP Solicitors, Solicitor Nick Hibbert, Kennedys Solicitors, Nathan Tietelbaum, Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Barrister Clair-Marie Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers
 
Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade, Bridge Lane, London NW11 0QN
Tel:  +44 (20) 8458 5656 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (20) 8458 5656      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065, DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
www.bnilaw.co.uk SRA no 70758
Partners – N N Iwanier, A E Bude V Vernick
 
Sophie Ruffles, Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors
Tel:  +44 (0) 207 643 8407 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 207 643 8407      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, Fax: +44 (0) 207 071 9258
It looks clear that the warrant of execution which was used to evict and lock Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid from the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, London Borough of Sutton fraudulently, wrongly, immorally and unjustly in complete disregard for natural and human justice in clear bread of normal guidelines and acceptable standards used in balliff evictions of residential properties, is a completely fraudulent documents and fraudulently has the words “County Court Claim” typed on it. The action HC06C02639 to do with being a county court action and was never heard in the county court. This action has always been High Court of Justice Chancery Division and the orders made were in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division. This was obviously organised by Jonathan Barry Kandler of Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors, Solicitor Simon Jackson, Finburn LLP Solicitors, Solicitor Nick Hibbert, Kennedys Solicitors, Nathan Tietelbaum, Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Barrister Clair-Marie Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers and Claire Louise Sandbrook, The Sheriff’s Lodgement Centre a Division of Sherwins Solicitors of 3-4 Freeport Office Village, Century Drive, Braintree, Essex UK  CM 77 8YG (SLC Ref 235977) as agents for Bude Nathan Iwanier on behalf of their clients Nathan Tietelbaum and his companies Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited and Northern Holdings Limited,
did this as a deliberate attempt to pervert the course of justice, conspiracy to defraud, by the aforementioned. This was done by the aforementioned as a deliberate and fraudulent attempt to bypass orders 45 and 46 of the Supreme Court Rules which state, “ notice of the application must be given to the tenant &… leave to issue the writ of execution should not be given without the tenant having the opportunity to be heard”
Also Barrister Marie-Clair Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers has admitted to Morgan J that Fineland Investments Limited claim to the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton ranks second to John Carew-Reid’s claim to ownership of the property who has lodged a transfer signed by Janice Vivien Pritchard with HM Land Registry prior to any other lodgments pursuant to a contract agreement dated 4th June, 2004. On this point alone the orders made by Acting Judge Alison Foster QC on the 31st March 2011 in HC06C02639 should be immediately set aside and then the warrant of execution dated the 30th March 2011 will have to be set aside and peaceful possession be granted to Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton.
Thus as John Carew-Reid has priority claim to the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton and John Carew-Reid had appointed Janice Vivien Pritchard and Robert Carter life time caretakers for the property and Robert Carter beneficial owner of the property then this is another clear reason why the eviction and locking out of Janice Vivien Pritchard and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton was illegal, wrongful and immoral and that an Morgan J has no choice but to make orders reinstating Janice Vivien Pritchard and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid in possession of the property 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton and grant peaceful possession of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton.
It is also noted that before Morgan J makes any formal court orders regarding the application by Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid for peaceful possession of  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, he must place the following on the witness stand for cross examination regarding their full knowledge of who prepared the fraudulent writ of possession dated 30th March, 2011 in HC06C02639, and who typed the worlds, “ County Court” on this document, who presented for stamping at the High Court, who actually stamped the document with the High Court Seal on the 30th March, 2011, what room in the High Court was the High Court Seal paced on the document, who and how was the document used  to evict and lock out Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid from their home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton on the 1st April, 2011:
(a)    Jonathan Barry Kandler
(b)   Nathan Tietelbaun
(c)    Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor
(d)   Clare Louise Sandbook of Sherforce_Sherwins Solicitors
(e)    Mr Bushnell of Sherforce_Sherwins Solicitors
 
The so called Mortgage Document that Solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler, Bude-Nathan-Iwanier Solicitors,
Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors, Solicitor Simon Jackson, Finburn LLP Solicitors, Solicitor Nick Hibbert, Kennedys Solicitors, Nathan Tietelbaum, Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Barrister Clair-Marie Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers have all being fraudulently and false saying to the court over the last few years in favour of Heritable Bank dated 9th August 2004, but signed 6th August 2004 could never in any stretch of the imagination could be considered a valid mortgage deed. The fact that this is the only document in existence that the aforementioned solicitors and barristers says is evidence that Janice Vivien Pritchard had a signed registered, real mortgage of 126,000 pounds sterling with Heritable Bank, is a complete disgrace and one of the biggest legal fraud on a court and Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and others in modern English Legal History. Please see some of the reasons why above.
 
We note that you have communicated with Jonathan Barry Kandler to request a copy to be emailed to us being what you all purport to be a signed mortgage for a 126,000 loan from Heritable Bank to Janice Vivien Pritchard secured against 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey CRO 4PW the title number
 
SGL660272.
Please note the following:
1. This purported mortgage document could only have been signed by a person with have a name of Janice Pritchard and purportedly dated 9th August, 2004
2. This is not signed by heritable bank
3. This was not signed on the 9th August, 2004
4. This does not have a title number and without a title number no bank can register a mortgage
5. This does not have an amount of money borrowed
6. This was not in the bundle of papers presented to the court in 11th and 12th October 2010 hearing in front to Foster J. The solicitors and barristers involved presented an unsigned copy ot the judge in the bundle of papers, because if the judge saw the signed one, the judge would have picked all the holes in it and declare it a document that had no legal effect.
7. This was never registered
8. The Heritable bank never lent any money pursuant to this purported mortgage charge and never was a part to it and never knew anything about it's existence
9. the funds 126,000 pounds that were paid to the Sutton borrow cams form overseas to Fineland Investments Limited 800,000 pounds, to Fineland's bank account with the Royal Bank of Scotland, then to Ingram Winter Green's account with Barclays, then to  Denniss Matthews Account then to the Borough of Sutton, this Heritable bank was used as a falsified image that they lent these funds but in reality there was never any money coming from Heritable Bank for the purchase of 1 Garratt Close Beddington
10. One can sign a legally valid mortgage with a bank until the bank has accessed and approved the loan. there is always a paper trail in existence to show an application form signed by the proposed borrower, being Janice Vivien Pritchard, the a letter of approval from the bank with whatever conditions the bank agree to the lend the money..interest rate, type of loan, whether it is interest only or principle and interest... the time given to repay the loan... if the bank requite a guarantor.. etc...the a paper banking trail showing the bank paying out the money directly to the seller of the property (in this case the Sutton Council) and at the same time obtaining a free title deed to be able to register their mortgage over ...   ..which has to be in existence which would go to prove the reality that such a mortgage was approved, paid out, and repaid at some point in time.
Before Royal Courts of Justice High Court Chancery Division Morgan J makes any ruling on whether he should grant possession of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, back to Janice Vivien Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid, he will have to order that solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler of Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, Nathan Tietelbaum, Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors on the witness stand to give evidence of their knowledge of the so called 126,000 pounds sterling had with Heritable Bank. The reality no such mortgage ever existed and this was one of the many false and misleading statements presented to Acting Judge Alison Foster QC on the 11th and 12th October, 2010 to obtain the orders made on the 31st January, 2011 by Acting Judge Alison Foster QC in HC06C02639. On this point alone these orders have to immediately set aside by the High Court of Justice Chancery Division.
 
11. One can not sign a mortgage over a property that is not one ones. name, with no title deed number and no amount of mortgage that is owed on a date that is not the real date....This so called ridiculous Mortgage deed is simply not a document that could have any legal effect and in any event would be void for uncertainty and void because Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors used the trust and faith Janice Vivien Pritchard had in him, to use undue influence to ge3t Janice Vivien Pritchard to sign documents of the 6th August, 2004 that were not in any way in the interest of Janice Vivien Pritchard and/or her son Robert Carter, when Janice Vivien Pritchard was in no fit mental health to know what she was signing being under the care of Sutton Hospital at the time for mental problems and depressions. Please see letters written by Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors to Sutton Council and to Ingram Winter Green Solicitors in August and September, 2004.
 
12. All that has happened is that Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors had a blank copy of a standard Mortgage Charge Deed on file and typed the name of Heritable Bank and Janice Pritchard ( not even her real name, her real name is Janice Vivien Pritchard, no bank would ever allow a borrower to sign a mortgage deed without placing the person's full real name), and had Janice Sign the document along with a mass of others papers that were just shoved in her face to sign, which were never read by Janice Vivien Pritchard and simply relied on her solicitor Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors that he was looking after the interests of herself and he son Robert Carter who is very ill, and still very ill. Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors should be struck off as a solicitor for getting his client to sign the documents he di get her to sign, and the other solicitors involved such Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, and Fineland Investments Limited and Nathan Teitelbaun agent involved in the preparation of these douments and using Solicitor Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors as an agent should all be put on trial by the court for contempt of court and should end up in jail and be struck off as solicitors and barristers so they can not do any more damage to other innocent people.
 
The reason why this document was never produced to the court before because of if had the  court and the judge would have laughed it out of court and the whole case would have fallen away.
 
Your immediate comments to this email would be much appreciated
 
Submissions to Morgan J for 13th April 2011 for application in HC11C00580
 
The so called Mortgage Document that Solicitor Jonathan Barry Kandler, Bude-Nathan-Iwanier Solicitors,
Solicitor Geraldine Paletz, Daniel J. Ginsbury Partner Ingram Winter Green Solicitor, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Solicitor Sophie Ruffles, Solicitor Tony Marsh Nurse, Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors, Solicitor Simon Jackson, Finburn LLP Solicitors, Solicitor Nick Hibbert, Kennedys Solicitors, Barrister Clair-Marie Bleasedale of Radcliff Chambers have all being fraudulently and false saying to the court over the last few years in favour of Heritable Bank dated 9th August 2004, but signed 6th August 2004 could never in any stretch of the imagination could be considered a valid mortgage deed. The fact that this is the only document in existence that the aforementioned solicitors and barristers says is evidence that Janice Vivien Pritchard had a signed registered, real mortgage of 126,000 pounds sterling with Heritable Bank, is a complete disgrace and one of the biggest legal fraud on a court and Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and others in modern English Legal History. Please see some of the reasons why above.
 
1. Letter dated 27th September from Ingram Winter Green (IWG) their client Nathan Tietelbaum  says that is their opinion the purported contract between Fineland Investments Limited (FIL)between Janice Pritchard (JV) dated 9th August 200 was void for two reasons
(a) JV did not sign the transfer
(b) JV was not mentally well enough at the time to understand the documents she signed, please ask the defendant’s solicitors to provide the letters from Denniss Matthews Solicitors to IWG and the Sutton Council in this regard, the claimants copies are wrongly at locked up at 1 Garratt Close Beddington Surrey
as well they have a copy of the letter dated 27th September from Ingram Winter Green their client Nathan Tietelbaum
 
2. Statement prepared by Sophie Ruffles of  Barlow Lyde Gilbert Solicitors dated the 11-04-2011 for Daniel J Ginsbury ( partner of IWG) to sign as the truth was deliberately false and misleading  in a number of material ways
(a) JV's name was never used in the council letter. Also JV constantly liased with the Sutton council at the time  on many occasion and informed the council of her plight and at no time did the council ever mention about have to sue the council.
(b) in relation to para 19 and 20:
It is a false statement to say the Fineland Investments Limited and their solicitors and/or Nathan Tietelbaum had never offered 75,000 pounds to settle the matter, There are legal letters confirming this arrangement being acceptable to all if documented and carried out on a proper fair and  legal basis. All this is a fact:
Nathan Tietelbaum rang up JV and stated this
" I will bring around 75,000 pounds in a bag to give you if you sign the paperwork I bring you to sign to sort of this deal"
 
This is actionable by Contempt of Court see Linwood v Andrews and Moore 1888 High Cotr Chancerey Division MATCH 20TH AND 21ST 1888
ALSO SEE FOR SETTING ASSIDE FOR INOCENT AND/OR DELIBERATE FRAUD
MARSHALL V JAMES cd 1905 Vol1
Moore v Peachey 1892 66LT 198
The ENGLISH LAW IS CLEAR
no one can gain by a court order obtained by either innocent and/or deliberate fraud and in all circumstances such an order will be set aside
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Mrs J V Pritchard
From: J Kandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>
Date: Thu, April 14, 2011 8:44 am
To: "'david.rosen@inlnews.com'" <david.rosen@inlnews.com>
Dear Mr Rosen
In relation to your emails, we wish to make it clear that it is disproportionate that we should have to read through the same to see if there is anything new in them.
If there is anything new, then please advise us separately.
Yours sincerely
Jonathan Kandler, Messrs Bude Nathan Iwanier
Direct Fax: 020 8731 7204
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This email is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by telephoning
  +44 (20) 8458 5656       and request to speak to the sender of the email. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other person.
Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade Bridge Lane, London, NW11 0QN
Tel:
            +44 (20) 8458 5656       Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065 DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
www.bnilaw.co.uk
PARTNERS:                           N N Iwanier                         A E Bude                                     V Vernick
CONSULTANTS:                  J B Kandler                          D Zysblat                                    B Dubiner          

       


Assistant to Gloucester HM Land Registrar, Katharine Brothers, HM Land Regsitrar Julie Jenkins and top property dispute London Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang .........................................
that started in 1983 with the Murder of the Late Henry Herbert Butler and the forging of his will by well known Freemason solicitor Simon James Fisher at the time working for Freemason Eggleton Solicitors who were struck off from being solicitors by the Legal Complaints Tribunal, who then handed their legal files to Madge Lloyd Gibson, who knowing the will was a forgery presented the false will to the Probate Office for as fraudulent Grant of Probate to be issued, all with the long term aim of defrauding the Later Herbert Henry Butler and his only child, Valerie Ann Butler of their legal right to ownership of their 25 acres and farm house known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Gloucester, GL2 3QE and have Haywicks farm fraudulently transferred into two of the fraud conspirators names Peter Leslie Urquhart and his wife Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, who had been legal clients of Eggletons solicitors and Madge Lloyd Gibson for over 30 years, who planned to hold the property as a front for all the other Freemason solicitors and ex-solicitors who are based in the Gloucester area including the Eccleton Family and their family development company Egdon Estates and Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington solicitors who are commonly known as Gloucestershire's Legal Mafia (GLM).

Assistant to HM Land Registrar Katharine Brothers, Gloucester HM Land Registrar  Julie Jenkins  and top property dispute London Barrister
Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang


22nd May 2012

TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

22nd May, 2012

Dear Ms Brothers

Further to our earlier emaIl we need to make the following points:

1. The INL News Investigation Team have obtained  a copy of about 20
internal HM Land Registry memos and records  created by the Gloucester
HM Land Registry Office dated from 6th January, 2011 till 17th May,
2012 which we are placing in an investigation file to be handed to the
Major Crime Squad of Scotland Yard.
These internal HM Land Registry memos and records  created by the
Gloucester HM Land Registry Office dated from 6th January, 2011 till
17th May, 2012  show conclusive evidence of  conspiracy to defraud and
conspiracy to pervert the course of justice along with other criminal
and civil offences committed by yourself and other staff in the HM
Land Registry in Gloucester which are legally described as
Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.
Some of the application reference numbers we have in our possession
are as follows:


1. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: 1740CZK
Applicants Name: Valerie Ann Jouai Priority Date: 6Jan 2011 - 12 Jan 2011
Priority Time: 18:19:47 By: Simons Muirhead Burton Reason: Unilateral Notice

2. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: C990FZK Applicants Name: .......
Priority Date: 11 Jan 2011 By: Claire Francis Hasten Code: Red Hasten
Date 11 Jan 2011 Group: 304, Location Date 20 January, 2011
Customer Name: STEPHEN REID B COM


3. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: C919FZK
Applicants Name: Valerie Ann Jouai Priority Period 12 Jan 2011 By:
David Hodges Reason: Unilateral Notice

4. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: Y750JZK
Applicants Name: .......... Priority Date: 17 Jan 2011, By: Claire Francis
Customer Name: Gloucester District Land Registry Chief Land Registrar
Reference: SR:VAJ: GR327583 DX7599 GLOUCESTER3, Tel: 0300-006-1111
Key Number: 0300-006-0050 Payment Method: NF - NO FEE


5. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: X046KZK
Applicants Name:......... Priority Date: 18 Jan 2011 Prority Time: 11:45:22,
By David Hodges Hasten Date: 18 Jan 2011
Customer Name: Simmons Muirhead & Burton Reference: MAS/JOUAI, Payment
Method: PP-Pre-PAID


6. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: C646KZK
Applicants Name:.......  Priority Time: 11:48:34, By: David Hodges
Hasten Date: 18 Jan 2011
Customer Name: Simmons Muirhead & Burton Reference: MAS/JOUAI, Payment
Method: PP-Pre-PAID

7. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: FB55B6F
Applicants Name:......... Priority Date: 19 JAN 2011 Priority Time:
09:13:56 By: David Hodges
Customer Name: MADGE LLOYD & GIBSON Reference: AKB/SJB?N1245/1
Customer Address: DD Account 34 Brunswick Road Gloucester GL1 1JJ DX
Address: DX7505 Telephone Number: 01452-520224 Key Number: 1518438 Fax
Number: 01452- 306866 Payment Method; DD Direct Debit Fee Payable: 50
pounds Fee Quoted 50 pounds

8. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: FB55C72
Applicants Name:........  Priority Date: 27 Jan 2011 Priority Time:
12:02:59 Last Activity: PC Reg. Creation Update By: Julie Williams
Location Information: GL LWR KB S/O
Customer Name: MADGE LLOYD & GIBSON Reference: AKB/SJB/U1018/4
Customer Address: DD Account 34 Brunswick Raod Gloucester GL1 1JJ DX
Address: DX7505 Telephone Number: 01452-520224 Key Number: 1518438 Fax
Number: 01452- 306866 Payment Method; DD Direct Debit Fee Payable: 550
pounds Fee Quoted 550 pounds


9. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: U299RZK
Applicants Name:........  Priority Date: 27 Jan 2011 Priority Time:
14:17:04 Last Activity: Data Captured  By: Claire Francis Location
Date: 20 JAN 2012
Customer Name: STEPHEN REID Reference: MAS/JOUAI
Customer Address: Reid and Associates, 3 Debra Court, Urangan, hervey
Bay, Queensland, Australia, 4655
Payment Method: PP- PRE-PAID

10. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: M599RZK
Applicants Name:...........................
Priority Date: 14:19:05 Last activity: Data Captured By: Claire Francis
Location Information: S/O adjudication, Location Group: 304 Location
Date: 20 JAN 2012
Customer Name: STEPHEN REID Reference: MAS/JOUAI
Customer Address: Reid and Associates, 3 Debra Court, Urangan, hervey
Bay, Queensland, Australia, 4655
Payment Method: PP- PRE-PAID

11. Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: C346VML
Applicants Name:...........................
Priority Date: 21 FEB 2012 Priority Time: 08:54:06 Last activity: Data
Captured By: Sarah Canipel
Location Information: PB ADJ SO , Location Group: 1.100 Location Date:
22 March 2012 *case exported to Peterborough* Application method: Not
recorded
Customer Name: VALERIE ANN BUTLER
Reference: HAYWICKS FARM -VA BUTLER
Customer Address: View Point Banwell Road Hutton Avalon S24 9TZ


12.  Title number: GR327583
Application Reference: V446VML
Applicants Name:...........................
Priority Date:21 FEB 2012 Priority Time: 08:55:45 Last activity: Data
Captured By: Sarah Canipel
Location Information: PB L:GLG S/O SP, Location Group: 1.100 Location
Date: 27 FEB 2012
*case exported to Peterborough* Application method: Not recorded
Customer Name: VALERIE ANN BUTLER
Reference: HAYWICKS FARM -VA BUTLER
Customer Address: View Point Banwell Road Hutton Avalon S24 9TZ
Payment Method: PP- PRE-PAID

13. ......

You will no doubt be called as a witness when this all comes to a full
trial. civil and criminal to explains the full meaning of these  ans
other application references.
The factual reality that you and the other HM Land Registry Staff and
the Treasury Solicitors involve din advising you and HM Land Registry
in this matter are well aware of is that application notices were
lodged over the title deed of Haywicks Farm from the 6th January, 2011
by Valerie Butler/Jouai's London Solicitors Simmons Muirhead & Burton
and two different sets of UNI and RX1 Notices were also lodged with HM
Land Registry which arrived at HM Land Registry on the 12th January,
2011 which were deliberately lost by HM Registry Staff and the second
set arriving on the 18th January, 2011.. which were corruptly withheld
from being placed on the day list on the 27th January, 2011 at14:17:04
being very conveniently till two hours after the transfer lodged on
the 27th January, 2011 at 12:02:59 by Madge Lloyd Gibson attempting to
have Haywicks Farm transferred from the name of the said Gary Roger
Jouai to Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, as a favour to the
two most powerfully connected Freemason controlled and owned legal
firms in Gloucester, being Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington,
who are well known in Gloucester as the Gloucester Legal Mafia, so
that they try corruptly,illegally and wrongly with the help of
yourself and HM Land Registry Staff to push through the registration
of the transfer of Haywicks Farm title deed to defraud Valerie Ann
Butler/Jouai and her partners of their rightful ownership in Haywicks
Farm, by falsely pretending that a priority interest had not been
lodged over the title deed of Haywicks Farm prior to such transfer
being lodged.

Please note that if what you say is true, that you have on the 21st
May, 2012 completed the processing of the transfer to have Haywicks
Farm transferred from the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai to Peter
Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, without waiting for the outcome of
the stay and setaside applications inn HC12C00678 and the orders
sought in HC11C004156 declare the contracts between the said Gary
Roger Jouai and Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, null and
void and of no legal effect, and the outcome of the set aside
application in HC11C00473 which has been set down for hearing on the
24th July, 2012 in the High Court of Justice and have deliberately
ignore the court order made by Justice Iyer in 1MA3045 on the 29th
December, 2011 ordering HM Land Registry to amend the title deed of
Haywicks Farm from showing the registered owner as being the said Gary
Roger Butler to showing Valerie Ann Butler and have ignored the new
UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over the title deed of Haywicks Farm on the
17th May, 2012 by Stephen  Carew-Reid to protect the interests of
Valerie Ann Butler, Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood in Haywicks
Farm, then what you and HM Land Registry have done is move your
criminal offences already committed of attempted Conspiracy to Pervert
to Course of Justice and Attempted Conspiracy to Defraud, to a
successful and completed Conspiracy to Pervert to Course of Justice
and  Conspiracy to Defraud, which increase the severity of your crimes
which means when you are all convicted of these crimes, which no doubt
you will be, the length of your prison terms will be a lot long and
what ever other punishment the courts hand out will me a lot more
harsh and of course ever worse the public perception and opinion of
your crimes will be a lot worse as the general public will see clearly
that you ignored all the warnings because you thought, like Rebecca
Brooks and her husband thought, that the power of the Freemasons and
the London Jewish Mafia would protect them from being exposed and/or
prosecuted  of the serious crimes that have now being accused and
charged for. The general public will have no sympathy for you at all
and will say he deserves the most harshest punishment the courts are
prepared to hand out as a warning and lesson to others you think they
can abuse their powers in senior positions in HM Government bodies.
We at the INL News Group certainly have no sympathy for your
deliberate willingness to be involved and help the other conspirators
who have been working on their plan to murder the Late Herbert Henry
Butler and forging his will and presenting this forged will for
probate, all with the end aim of defrauding him and his only child
Valerie Ann Butler of their rightful ownership of a valuable
development property in Gloucester that consists of about 25 acres on
two sides of Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester and a two story farm
house which has the potential for a development profit in the next 20
years to the conspirators of over 20 million pounds.

Good luck for the future.. you will need all the luch you can get from now on..

Yours  sincerely

INL News Legal, Editorial and Investigative Team


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Fwd: Our Ref: GR351346/A/223/JW
From: <news@inlnews.com>
Date: Mon, May 21, 2012 3:45 pm
To: "Valerie Butler" <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, "Katharine Brothers"
<Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office"
<gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "Adjudicator to HM Land
Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: "David Rosen" <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>,
davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com, "Marie-Claire Bleasdale"
<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "David Rosen"
<david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>



TO:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

22nd May, 2012

Dear Ms Brothers

By the looks of things your legal career with HNM Land Registry is all but over
You have become a complete liability to HM Land Registry and have
destroyed the good name that HM Land Registry ever had.
It is time you started looking for a new job, may be best in another
country that doe snot have extradition proceedings with England,
before you are carted away in hand cuffs by the police from the
Gloucester Offices of HM land Registry to join the ranks of Rebecca
Brooks in the Royal Courts of Justice on conspiracy to defraud and
conspiracy to pervert the course of justice along with other criminal
and civil offences committed by yourself and other staff in the HM
Land Registry in Gloucester which are legally described as
Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.

Good luck for the future.. you will need all the luch you can get from now on..

Yours  sincerely

INL News Legal, Editorial and Investigative Team

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Our Ref: GR351346/A/223/JW
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, May 21, 2012 3:30 pm
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, David Rosen
<davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>

To:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

22nd May, 2012

Dear Ms Brothers

You and the other HM Land Registry Staff continue to act in an
illegal, wrongful and corrupt way and continue to commit criminal and
civil offences of staff in the HM Land Registry in Gloucester which
are legally described as
Malfeasance, collusion and dereliction of duty of public officers.
You have also joined in with barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale, Owen
Rhys and Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart is a
conspiracy to defraud me and my partners of your lawful rights to
ownership Haywicks Farm and also joined together in a conspiracy to
pervert the course of Justice which are all civil and criminal wrongs
which you all are guilt5y of and along with HM Land Registry as well
as yourselves can be civilly sued as well a criminally charges, which
no doubt you eventually will once a complete police and judicial
inquiry is completed.

Your actions have also also helped bring the International Media's
attention and HM Land Registry, yourself. Barrister Marie Clair
Bleasdale and other corrupt judges, masters and adjudicators who have
helped such an Owen Rhys, Master Teverson, Justice Mann, Justice
Morgan, Justice David Richards Master Price,have now been made famous
on the world Internet and will be recorded in the shame files of the
INL News next publication of The Triumph of Truth (Who is Watching The
Watchers?) which all volumes are help permanently in the National
Library in Canberra for generations to come to read.

Please see:
http://awn.bz/HMLandRegistryCorruption.html

http://awn.bz/HMLandRegistryCorruption.html

Assistant to HM Land Registrar Katharine Brothers, Gloucester HM Land
Registrar  Julie Jenkins  and top property dispute London Barrister
Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang


Also you have no reply to my request to acknowledge the UN1 and RX1
Notices filed by Stephen Carew-Reid on the 17th May, 2012 at HM Land
Registry which attaches a copy of the seal court application for a
stay and a copy of the payment to the court for such stay application.
You in your letters dated the 21st and 22nd February, 2012 stated that
if HM Land Registry have been noticed that a stay on the orders of
Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, that HM Land
Registry would refrain from giving effect to such orders.

Please look forward to further international publicly of your  and the
other HM Land Registry staff's illegal, wrongful and corrupt actions,
a full police and judicial inquiry and HM Land Registry and yourself
and other HM Land Registry staff members being sued for millions of
pounds in damages and be publicly shamed in the world media for ever.

Kindest regards

Valerie Ann Butler
"Valerie Butler" <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>,

CC:
"David Rosen" <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>,
"David Rosen" <news@inlnews.com>,

Date: 21 May 2012

From:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111 Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick
Your ref
N/A
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwick

To:
"Valerie Butler" <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>

Valerie Ann Butler
C/O View Point
Banwell Road
Hutton
Avon
BS24 9TZ

Dear Ms Butler,
I refer to previous correspondence and your email sent at 12:17 on
17 May 2012. I confirm that the application for registration of the
transfer dated 13 December 2012 in favour of Mr and Mrs Urquhart
has now been completed and the other applications which were
lodged on your behalf and referred to in my letter dated 3 May 2012
have been cancelled.
Your application for a stay of the order of the Adjudicator dated 16
February 2012 has not been properly issued by the court and
served on Land Registry. Accordingly in the absence of a stay we
are entitled to proceed with the application for registration of the
transfer.

Yours sincerely,
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 00 61790


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Date: Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:18 PM
Subject: Our Ref: GR351346/A/223/JW
To: valerieannbutler@gmail.com



The document attached is an official requisition, reminder or letter
from Land Registry.  It is not a circular and relates either to an
application you have lodged with us or a property in which you have an
interest.  No paper copy of the item of correspondence will be sent to
you.
The document is in 'Portable Document Format'(PDF) which replicates
the appearance of the hard copy version. You will need Adobe Acrobat
Reader to open the document.  If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat
Reader it can be installed free from www.adobe.com.  Please note that
as the document is in PDF format you cannot add text to any document
that you need to complete and return to Land Registry.  You will have
to return any such completed document by post.
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk


If you have received this e-mail and it was not intended for you,
please let us know, and then delete it. Please treat our
communications in confidence,
as you would expect us to treat yours. Land Registry checks all mail
and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you
open any
attachments at your own risk.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government
Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless
Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number
2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Friday 18th May 2012

Urgent Attention:
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk May, 2012
 
Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke
 
Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers


"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
 
Please see attached High Court Application for your urgent attention that was sent to you yesterday and a copy also attached to the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged by me Stephen Carew-Reid yesterday (17th May 2012) with HM Land Registry, at the West Croyden Office, which should arrive by DX today from HM Registry West Croyden Office.
It would be much appreciated if you could email me to confirm you have received them at the Gloucester HM Land Registry Office,.

Yours sincerely

Stephen Carew-Reid
email: "stephen carew-reid" <stephencarewreid@gmail.com>,


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, May 18, 2012 at 3:54 PM
Subject: UN1-RX1 Notices lodged by SCarew-Reid 17th May 2012 HM Land Registry,
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>, Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>, stephencarewreid@gmail.com


Friday 18th May 2012

Urgent Attention:
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk May, 2012
 
Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke
 
Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers


"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <
MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <
Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <
ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
 
Please see attached High Court Application for your urgent attention
we are asking the High Court to grant a formal stay on the orders Owen Rhys  the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry made on the 16th February, 2012 concerning Haywicks Farm title deed without  a hearing, however it may well be that the High Court may insist that a formal open oral hearing where all parties have the opportunity to have their say and present verbal and written submissions, and in that case we are asking the court to list this application for a formal oral open hearing on the 24th July, 2012 in court 10 in the Rolls Building, Fetta Lane, London. when we already have a hearing set down before a judge to argue setting aside the orders of Justice Mann who made orders refusing to grant leave to appeal the orders made by Master Teverson in the original High Court action taken out on me behalf of John Carew-Reid as trustee and power of attorney for me being HC11C00473
The only reason why Master Teverson struck out HC111C00473 was because he felt that English Law did not allow a non solicitor to be a claimant on behalf of another person in the capacity as trustee and/or power of attorney. However, Master Teverson is absolutely wrong on this legal point, because  High Court Judge, Justice Paul Morgan has allowed an action to continue involving the other High Court claim Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale is involved with between Janice Pritchard as trustee for Robert Carter and Janice Pritchard as trustee for John Carew-Reid against Fineland Investments Limited and others. Justice Morgan has also gone one step further by granting leave to Fineland Investments Limited and its solicitors Bude Natham Iwanier and their counsel Marie Clair Bleasdale to issue a counter claim against Janice Pritchard as trustee for Robert Carter and Janice Pritchard as trustee for John Carew-Reid, thus further cementing the English Law in the High Court of Justice whereby it has become legally acceptable for a non solicitor is be a claimant as trustee and/or power of attorney for another person. Plus there has been so many other false and misleading facts and points of law that has been used by Justice Mann as a basis of his orders, that there is no doubt that his orders refusing leave to appeal the orders made by Master Teverson in HC11C00473 striking out that action will be set aside in due course. No that that makes any real difference as far as sorting out the legal arguments with the rightful ownership and who should be the rightful registered owner of  Haywicks Farm, because the other High Court claims and orders made since HC11C00473 was stuck out have taken over from HC11C00473 and really y passed HC11C00473, so the outcome of HC11C00473 has become irrelevent, other than the facts, that you and the Treasury solicitors that are working behind the scenes on this case for you preparing all your letter to me. are well aware of that Owen Rhys made his wrongful orders on the 16th February, 2012 on a false fact presented by Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale on behalf of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart to Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012 that the leave to appeal oral hearing had been heard and determined. You will notice that the hearing before Justice Mann was in March, 2012 after the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 so this is clear evidence that the adjudicator's ruling was based on a false claim that the leave to appeal oral hearing had been fully determined by the High Court of Justice.

As you are well aware, the internal records of the Gloucester HM Land Registry Office clearly show a conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers by yourself, HM Land Resgistrar for Gloucester Julie Jenkins, and HM Land Registry Clerks Claire Francis,  David Hodges, Julie Williams and others by the clear provable and undisputeable fact that every effort was made by the afforementioned and/or others so clandestinely, wrongly, corruptly and/or illegally lost, mislaid etc the first set of UN1 and RX1 notices set over to Gloucester HM Land Registry to be lodged over Haywicks Farm title deed to protect my claims over the property, by a clerk in HM Land Registry Gloucester Office falsely pretending they were set of to my London Solicitors Simon Muirhead and Burton, which was never received by  my London Solicitors Simon Muirhead and Burton,and thus obviously never sent too them by Gloucester HM Land Registry, so that this would help give a window of opportunity for the two sets of solicitors involved Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson to have the transfer from Gary Roger Jouia to the Urquharts lodged with HM Land Registry and logged on to the day list in at a priority dated when there was no prior notices of claim against the title deed of Haywicks Farm. Their obviously corrupt contacts in the Gloucester Office of HM Land Registry were keeping them informed about any other claims and/or applications against the title deed of Haywicks Farm  and were obviously well aware of the application notices which were lodged against Haywicks Farm title deed by  my London Solicitors Simon Muirhead and Burton, with the first one being lodged on the 6th January, 2011 and renewed three times thus keeping a constant and continued notice of claim over the Haywicks Farm title deed for me until my UN1 and RX1 Notices were formerly lodged, with the first ones lodged on the 12th January, 2012 as per Gloucester HM Land Registry Internal Records, ( which were deliberately made to disappear by HM Land Registry clerks, never to be seen again) and the second lot of UN1 and RX1 notices arriving at HM Land Registry on the 18th January, 2011, while the application notice lodged by  my London Solicitors Simon Muirhead and Burton, were still current against the Haywicks Farm Title deed and second lot of fees provided with the second lot of UN1 and RX1 Notices. So a master plan had to be divided to  help create  a window of opportunity for the two sets of solicitors involved Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson for have the transfer from Gary Roger Jouia to the Urquharts lodged with HM Land Registry and logged on to the day list in at a priority dated when there was no prior notices of claim against the title deed of Haywicks Farm. The plan had worked well with organising the first lot of UN1 and RX1 Notices to disappear, and eventually the application notices would run out of time and there would be no prior claim from me or my representatives over Haywicks Farm title deed so the transfer could be logged onto the day list with no prior claim. However, along came the second lot of UN1 and RX1 Notices which arrived on the 18th January, 2011 at Gloucester HM Land Registry Office from Australia by special courier mail with a second lot of lodging fees attached which should have been immediately logged onto the day lost on the 18th January at the hour, minute and second they arrived at the Gloucester Office of HM Land Registry, however . So what was illegally oranised by public officers by yourself, HM Land Resgistrar for Gloucester Julie Jenkins, and HM Land Registry Clerks Claire Francis,  David Hodges, Julie Williams and others  in a clear  conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers, was for the second lot of UN1 and RX1 Notices to e put in a cupboard and not logged onto the day list as they should have been on the 18th January, 2011, and instead they were corruptly and wrongly shown as being logged onto the day list at 14:17:04 on the 27th January, 2011, conveniently about two hours after  Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson orgainsed for have the transfer from Gary Roger Jouia to the Urquharts logedd with HM Land Registry  and logged onto the day list at 12:02:59 on the 27th January, 2011. This creating to on paper window of opportunity for  Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson to have the transfer from Gary Roger Jouia to the Urquharts lodged with HM Land Registry logged onto the day list without showing any prior claims on the title of Haywicks Farm
This is clear cut corruption, involving a conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers, and you and treasury solicitors, even if not directly involved in doing this illegal wrongful and/or corrupt behaviour, are definately involved in helping to cover it up., by trying to quickly have Haywicks Farm transferred to Mr and Mrs Urquhart and by passing and ignoring the court order made the 29th December, 2011 by Justice Iyer of the High Court ordering HM Land Registry to remove the name of Gary Roger Jouai from the title deed of Haywicks Farm and replace it with my name Valerie Ann Butler, and ignoring the other various High Court claims and applications that are still pending concerning the rightful ownership of Haywicks Farm, in the hope by quickly but illegally and wrongly transferring the title deed from the name of Gary Roger Jouai to the Urquharts, the problem will all get buried and go away.
Please understand that the only way this problem is going to go away for the Gloucester office of HM Land Registry and its staff is for the  HM Land Registry to obey the court order made the 29th December, 2011 by Justice Iyer of the High Court ordering HM Land Registry to remove the name of Gary Roger Jouai from the title deed of Haywicks Farm and replace it with my name Valerie Ann Butler.

Kindest regards

Valerie Ann Butler
Email: 


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Fwd: Appl_Joinder-Stay_ContemptCourt_HC12C00678_Made-16-05-2012(WOutCoveringLetter)
To: David Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, stephencarewreid@gmail.com

David  hello,
Thanks for your comprehensive e-mail - I hope we have cleared a few misunderstandings.
First of all say "hello" to Janice from me.
 

You are right in the work you have done could not have been done by any solicitor - you have stuck your neck out in a big way, so do not think I do not appreciate your will-power and dedication to this sad and sordid case!!

As I understand it to-day from the extraction of the Deeds of Title THE TWIRP still has the Deeds in his name, as you have blocked it onwards.
You are right -  the Adjudicator Owens in our February sessions was very embarrassed and put out that we had gone through Manchester Court - like where did this come from 
A long, and as you know a very corrupt story - as you read from his report I told him if you do not adjourn this case here and now I have no alternative to take this matter to the police - as I was advised to do by very trust-worthy solicitors (I worked for David Hickey) editor of "The Sun Herald" in Sydney and Alex Morrow knew about my case and that is how I came in touch with Simon Muirhead & Burton who were solicitors in London for the newspaper.
 
All in all David, if you can see any way fit to continue on the massive job you started on that would be great.!
 
I will send you a further medical certificate to-morrow.

.
Close for now.
Regards,
Valerie.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:24 PM
Subject: Appl_Joinder-Stay_ContemptCourt_HC12C00678_Made-16-05-2012(WOutCoveringLetter)
To: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>


Urgent Attention:
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk May, 2012
 
Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke
 
Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers


"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <
MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <
Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <
ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
 
Please see attached High Court Application for your urgent attention:
 
Any attempt by yourselves and/or any staff member of HM Land Registry and/or HM Land Registry to attempt to  be in any way involved with  giving effect to the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, will be seen as further attempts by you all to conspire to pervert the course of Justice, conspirsacy to defraud,contempt of court and malefiance of public officers which are serious civil and criminal wrongs which one of the lost powerful people in the United Kingdom Rebecca Brooks and her husband and helpers have now been charged with, So so not think for a second that anyone in the Treasury Solicitors Office and the powerful Freemasons,
( which my son in law is a member of in Australia, so I know who they are and how they work and the power base they have), will protect you in the end as a female non Freemason solicitor in the Crown Solicitors Office will end up having no fear in prosecuting you all if they feel that this is necessary
 
yours kindly
 
Thomas Allwood for the claimants in HC12C00678 Being Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Jouai and Thomas Allwood
Address for service for the Claimants:15 Home Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9JR
In the High Court of Justice Chancery  Division
Claim Number: HC12 C00678
                              and HC11C04156 and HC11C00473
Claimants
Stephen Carew-Reid
Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai
Thomas Allwood
Defendants
HM Land Registry
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart
Antonia Alfresdo Maria Nicolosi and Ruth Helen Nicolosi
Gary Roger Butler/Jouai
Application for Joinder, Application to consolidate claims, contempt of court against Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale, application for stay of order made by Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012, application to vacate hearing before Master Price in Claim Number: HC11C04156 on the 5th July, 2012 for application to strike out and re-list before a High Court Judged in Chambers on the 24th July, 2012 in Court 10, Rolls Building, Fetta Lane London.
 
Orders Sought:
1.       To have the following parties joined to HC12C00678 for acting in a way that they have conspired to pervert the course of justice and in a conspiracy to defraud the  claimants being Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Butler and Thomas Allwood of the lawful rights in a property  know as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE  and also know as Title Number GR327583 and also known as Title Number GR351346:
 (a) Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale
(b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester
(c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester
(d) Treasury Solicitors. 
                        Particulars of Conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers
 Particulars of the parts played in the conspiracy to defraud will exceed three folios and bet set out at trial of this action, however it is noted that some of the wrongful acts they have committed is to deliberately with wilful intent to harm the claimants have presented false and misleading facts , information and legal arguments in letters and submissions (written and verbal) that have been presented to the High Court of Justice and to the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and other letters to the claimants  and as basis for wrongfully claiming they can by pass a number of current court actions and applications that are pending in the courts in HC12C00678, HC11C04156 and HC11C00473 concerning the rightful ownership and who should rightfully ne registered on the title deed as the registered owner of the property known as Haywicks Farm and a court order made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA3045 by High Court Judge Iyer  which states that HM Land Registry should remove the name of “the said Gary Roger Jouai” from the title deed of the property known as Haywicks Farm, and replace it with Valerie Ann Butler. One of the most serious deliberate false statements made (a)  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors is that  HC12C00678 is not a live action because the lodging fees have not been paid, when they all know from the High Court records that the lodging fee was paid for in cash and that the false story that the lodging fee had not been paid was deliberately made up by (a) Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors as a way of arguing that there was no stay and/or set aside order applied against the orders made by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, because  Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester , Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester , Sarah Canipel acting as Objections Clerk for HM Land Registry had in letters dated 21st and 22nd February, 2012 as authorised agents , servants, and/or otherwise made undertakings on behalf of HM Land Registry that as soon as HM Land Registry are notified that  there is a stay application to stay the orders of Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry made in the court, that HM Land Registry not to give effect to the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart. The main aim of the conspiracy being to make sure that well known Freemason Peter Leslie Urquhart and his well known Freemason Partners who have a great power and influence in the English Legal System , The High Court of Justice, Treasury Solicitors, the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and the Office of the Land Registry end up with control of the title deed of Haywicks Farm in the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart as trustee for their various silent Freemason Partners so they can complete a multi million pound luxury residential development of Haywicks Farm within  the next 20 years with a expected net profit of over 20 million pounds to be shares amongst Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart and their various silent Freemason Partners who include powerful and well connected English solicitors and their families. So, because the issue of HC12C00678 which has asked for a stay and set aside orders against the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, meant that HM Land registry had to honour their undertaking not to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, made in the letters written by   Sarah Canipel acting as Objections Clerk for HM Land Registry on the 21st February, 2012 and Katharine Brothers acting a Assistant to Julie Jenkins the HM Land Registrar for Gloucester on the 22nd February, 2012, HM Land Registry could not legally process  a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, unless they could make up the false claim that the lodging fees for HC12C00678 had not been paid, which if this was true, the HC12C00678 would be stayed until these fees were paid. The making up of the false claim that the court  fees of HC12C00678 had not been paid by the claimants is one of the most serious examples of a conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice and conspiracy to defraud made by HM Land Registry and Treasury Solicitors staff and one of the most well respected property dispute barristers in London, that the English Legal System has seen for long time. It is also noted that Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester , Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester  and  Treasury Solicitor   have committed a common law tort of maleficance of public officers and this can be sued personally for damages as well as in their office as representing HM Land Registry owned by the Government of the United Kingdom and  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale has committed a serious contempt of court as  barrister for knowingly presenting false and misleading information to the court and has breach many of the oaths, rules, undertakings and obligations a barrister in the United Kingdom has to abide by and thus should be struck off from being allowed to practice law in the United Kingdom as wel as pay damages that have been causes y such deliberate and calculated wrongdoing.  For all these reasons there in no doubt that (a)  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors should be joined to  HC12C00678 as defendants to be made to account for such wrong doing and also for the reason that they must be immediately restrained from using their power in HM Land Registry to wrongfully and for an illegal and/or wrongful purpose from being able to give effect to  the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart.
2.       To join and/or consolidate High Court Claims HC12C00678, HC11C04156, and HC11C00473 and 1MAC00473.
3.       Application for a stay to  the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, until the full determination and/or carrying out of all applications and claims for orders sought and/or made in HC12C00678, HC11C00415, HC11C00473 and 1MA3045, and/or until further order.
4.       Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry, Julie Jenkins Acting asHM  Land Registrar and HM Land Registrty be restrained from  processing a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart until the full determination and/or carrying out of all applications and claims for orders sought and/or made in HC12C00678, HC11C00415, HC11C00473 and 1MA3045, and/or until further order.
5.       Application lodged by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Urquhart in HC11C004156 to strike out HC11C004156 that has been listed before Master Price on the 5th July, 2012 be vacated and re-listed before High Court Judge in Chambers on the 24th July, 2012 in Court 10, Rolls Building, Fetta Lane, London at the same time as an application to set aside the orders made by Mann J in HC11C00473 has already been listed.
6.       The orders made by Master Price in HC11C04156 on the 10th May, 2012 be set aside on a number of grounds including that fact that the claimant was not served and/or had knowledge of the application that was argued on the 10th May, 2012 in HC11C04156 and was not in attendance in person and/or by legal representative at the hearing before Master Price on the 10the May, 2012in HC11C04156.
7.       That 28 days for service on Valerie Ann Butler of the strike out application by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Urquhart in HC11C004156 to strike out HC11C004156 and all supported statements of truth and submissions be allowed because Valerie Ann Butler is currently in Australia because she is too sick to return to the United Kingdom at present.
8.       Costs of this application be in the cause.
9.       Any further orders the court feels are just and fair to make.
Dated: 16th May, 2012
Signed
...............................................................................................
Thomas Allwood for the claimants in HC12C00678 


Assistant to HM Land Registrar Katharine Brothers, Gloucester HM Land Registrar  Julie Jenkins
and top property dispute London Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang


 
INL News Legal and Investigative Team
Email: news:inlnews.com
8th May, 2012
Attention:
Attorney Marie-Claire Bleasdale
Email: "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
Radcliffe Chambers
 "Radcliffe Clerks" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
and to:
Peter Urquhart
 "Peter Urquhart" <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>
and to:
"Katharine Brothers"
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry
Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
Email:gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk
 
Ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04

Owen Ryhys, Acting as adjudicator to HM Land Registry in Gloucester
 
Notice of proposed article before publishing


Attorney Marie-Claire Bleasdale, HM Land Registry Lawyer Katharine Brothers helps Well Known Freemason Peter Urquhart and other well powerful Freemason attorneys, judges, Masters and Clerks in London's High Court of Justice, to defraud Valerie Ann Butler of her legal rights to Haywicks Farm on about 23 acres, which is in the process of being developed into a multi million pound luxury development in Gloucestershire, which has been in the Butler family for over 100 years.


The Legal and Investigative Team for the INL News Group have been investigating a serious conspiracy to defraud that is in the process of being committed against an elderly very sick English Pensioner, Valerie Ann Butler involving. The main purpose of the fraud is to fraudulently and/or wrongfully steal Haywicks Farm from English Pensioner Valerie Ann Butler, which has been in the Butler family for over 100 years.


The main beneficiaries of the fraud being well known and powerfully connected Freemason, Peter Leslie Urquhart, and well known and powerful Freemason solicitors Simon James Fisher and his legal firm Lutton Dunford, Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington the all powerful Freemason Eggleton Family who run a property development company known as Egdon Estates.


Haywicks Farm is on around 23 acres and is prime residential development land on on the edge of the main canal is Gloucester and is ripe for a multi million pound luxury property development to be approved Stroud Council which is controlled by senior Freemasons who are well known to be happy to take bribes to have a property development approved.


The main conspirators being well known and powerfully connected Freemason, Peter Leslie Urquhart, and well known and powerful Freemason solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson, Rickerby's solicitors and Langley Wellington the all powerful Freemason Eggleton Family who run a property development company known as Egdon Estates, have had to call in favours from corrupt Freemason Owen Rhys acting as adjudicator to HM Land Registry in Gloucester, corrupt Freemason High Court Master Teverson and corrupt Freemason High Court Judges-Justice Mann and Justice David Richards as well as a corrupt Assistant lawyers to HM Land Registrar named Katharine Brothers to help them complete the conspiracy to defraud and cover the conspiracy to defraud up.


There are multi millions of pounds involved because of the development potential of Haywicks Farm situated in Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucestershire.



The conspiracy to defraud English Elderly Pensioner Valerie Ann Butler of her ownership rights to Haywicks Farm started as far back as 1984 when a fraudulent and false will for the Late Herbert Henry Butler, which was never s signed by the Late Herbert Henry Butler and was never formally and/or legally witnessed by the purported witnesses being Simon James Fisher and a person who never legally existed as a real person, a Vivienne Hobbs, was prepared with the help of Freemason attorney Simon James Fisher using false name of the other alleged witness, who worked for the very powerful Freemason Eggleton legal firm, with their power base in Gloucestershire being greatly strengthened by the fact the Mr Eggleton was the Gloucestershire Sherriff and could make anything happen in Gloucestershire.


The INL News Legal and Investigative Team have also uncovered evidence that leads to a strong suggestion and belief that the conspirators and/or their associates were also involved in the murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler in February, 1990, so that they could then use one of the other conspirators Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson to present this fraudulent and false will to the probate Office in Gloucestershire to obtain a grant of probate in favour name of as person who did not legally exist and had no formal photo ID in that name.


Then they all waited 20 years for the dust to settle, and for all the nearby land to be fully developed coming out of Gloucester, so that the next land that will be ready for development and adding council services will be properties in Haywicks that border the canal. They were also hoping that the only daughter of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, Valerie Ann Butler, who has sole right to Haywicks Farm on the death of her father, would have died by now. However, the conspirators could not wait any longer, so the Freemason businessman Peter Leslie Urquhart, who was selected by Eggletons, his  attorneys for over 30 years, to front for the other conspirators to have Haywicks Farm registered in his and his wife Jaqueline Ann Urquhart's names, so that it could be quietly transferred of the name that did not legally exist.


Eggleton Solicitors and the powerful Freemason Eggleton family who run Edgon Estates, were struck off as attorneys by the Legal Complaints Tribunal and all their clients and legal files were taken over by powerful Freemason Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and its was Madge Lloyd Gibson who deliberately and knowingly presented a false and fraudulent will to the Gloucestershire Probate Office in August, 1990 to help the conspirators have Haywicks Farm registered in a name that does not legally exist, with the long term plan of eventually transferring Haywicks Farm title into the name of Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart when the time was right.
So the conspirators had to make out it all was a normal sale of Haywicks Farm to Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquart by publicly advertising the property, however none of the 100 other interested purchasers of Haywicks Farm were interested in making an offer to purchase the property because any sale contract would have to include an overage deed, which meant that for the next 20 years, if the property has development approval obtained by the Stroud Council, then the purchasers of  the property will have to pay the Vendor ( who is behind the scenes a group of powerful Freemason business men and attorneys  who used a name of a person who did not exist to obtain the rights to the property) 50% of the increased value as a result of the development approval. This means that if the value of Haywicks Farm increases from the original sale price around 660,000 pounds to 20 million with the next 20 years, then the purchasers of Haywicks Farm would have to pay these powerful Freemason solicitors and businessmen around 10 million pounds on top of the original 660,000 pounds purchase price in 2011.
Unfortunately for the conspirators, Valerie Ann Butler, even though very sick and elderly, has not died as yet and requested help from the INL News Legal and Investigative Team to get Haywicks Farm back for her form these evil and greedy conspirators who have spent the best part of  30 years planning and scheming how to end up with the title deed of Haywicks Farm into one of their names without being able to be challenged on the future by Valerie Ann Butler and/or one of her children and/or grand children.
The conspirators tried to quietly transfer the title deed of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart in February, 2011 however the INL News Legal and Investigative Team have been legally blocking such transfer since December, 2010.
So the conspirators had call in the help of their powerful corrupt Freemason High Court Masters, Judges and clerks and HM Registry adjudicators, and lawyers working inside the HM Registry Office who have been prepared to act in a very obvious corrupt and/or wrongful way to help the conspirators have the title deed of Haywicks Farm registered in the name of Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart. 
Some of the powerful corrupt Freemason lawyers, attorneys, High Court Masters, Judges and clerks and HM Registry adjudicators, and lawyers working inside the HM Registry Office which included females who are not Freemasons who have obviously been bribed  and/or offered some promotion in their jobs in some way who have been prepared to act in a very obvious corrupt and/or wrongful way to help the conspirators have the title deed of Haywicks Farm registered in the name of  Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart include the following:
1.       High Court Master Teverson- Well known senior Freemason
2.       High Court Judge _ Justice Mann- Well known senior Freemason
3.       High Court Judge _ Justice David Richards - Well known senior Freemason
4.       High Court Judge – Justice Paul Morgan
5.       Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
6.       Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant Land Registrar in Gloucester
7.       Various corrupt freemason clerks and other  staff in the HM Land Registry Office in Gloucestershire
8.       Various corrupt Freemason  clerks and other  staff  in the Office to the Adjudicator  to the HM Land Registry
9.       Various corrupt Freemason clerks and other staff in the London High Court of Justice
10.    Lawyers Madge Lloyd Gibson well known Freemason lawyers
11.    Lawyers Rickerbys, who Colin Gibson who was one of the original partners in Madge Lloyd Gibson now is a partner of and used his new firm’s powerful freemason contacts in the High Court of Justice, the Office to the HM Land Registry and the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to help act in corrupt and/or wrongful ways to help by pass all the High Court legal actions and applications pending and help ignore a court order made by a High Court Judge ordering that the title deed of Haywicks Farm be registered in the name of Valerie Ann Butler
12.    Lawyer Langley Wellingtom Lawyers
13.    Eggleton Solicitors and the Eggleton Family who own and run Egdon Estates
14.    Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale of Radcliffe Chambers in London
15.    Other various powerful and well connected Freemason Attorneys.
16.    Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquart
The current situation is that while English Pnesioner, Valerie Ann Butler is visiting her grand children and other family in Australia and has been ruled by her doctors as unfit to travel back to England for a while, the Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant to the HM Land Registrar have with the help of corrupt HM Treasury attorneys and lawyers conspired together in a corrupt and wrongful way to help the conspirators to bypass High Court claims and applications and appeals rights and write letters that are full of false statements and misleading statement and false and misleading legal arguments to try and have the title deed of Haywicks Farm  illegally, corruptly and/or wrongly registered in the name of Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquart.
The INL News Legal and Investigative Team have been researching and investigating the operations of High Court of Justice in England and Wales, the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, UK Border Agency, The Prime Minister of the UK’s office and HM Land Registry over the last five years in secret undercover operation and have found that illegal, wrongful and corrupt actions as going on a regular basis and the power of anyone connected to the London Jewish Mafia and/or the Freemasons to able to obtain any wrongful and/or corrupt court and/or adjudication orders, have documents and correspondence disappear,  official letters not sent advising people of court hearing dates,  letters and applications requesting court hearing simply disappearing and other important documents have simply disappeared from court files, in many instances never to be seen again.
The INL News Investigation and Legal Team have found that there is quite an obvious corrupt and wrongful net work of people working within the London High Court of Justice, HM Land Registry, HM Treasury Solicitors and the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry using their power in an illegal, wrongful and corrupt way to help powerful London Jewish Mafia and Freemason connections obtain what orders they want at any level of the HM Land Registry adjudication process and/or the High Court process and in the end corrupt staff such as Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and Katharine Brothers acting as assistant to HM Land Registrar  just take the law into their own hands with the help of corrupt Lawyers and Attorneys working for HM Treasury Solicitors to write their letters, judgements and  responses for them to make it all look like they are acting within the law, but in actual fact present letters. Judgement and responses full of false and misleading statements and facts and false and misleading legal arguments.
We have a situation that at present Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant to the HM Land Registrar in Gloucester sending out a letter with her name on it, pretending that she has written the letters, however it was written by a HM Treasury Lawyer and/or Attorney, who wants to hide behind Katharine Brothers, so if anything goes wrong and the whole conspiracy is publicly exposed as it is about to be in this article that is about to be presented worldwide in the International  Media, the Freemason HM Treasury Lawyer or Attorney who really wrote the letter dated the 3rd May, 2012 signed by Katharine Brothers as Assistant to the HM Land Registrar addressed to Valerie Ann Butler, which is full of false and misleading statements of fact and false and misleading legal arguments, can leave Katharine Brothers to publicly and legally take the fall.
This is who the Freemason work. They put an female up front who is not a Freemason, but is willing to act in a wrongful and/or corrupt and/or illegal way to help Freemasons whom are more seniors in their department, by the offer of a good promotion and a secure work life if they do what they are told and do not ask questions.
They advise clerks like Katharine Brothers that they are safe in presenting false and misleading letters to people because they can always just say, “ hey, the letter was drafted by a senior HM Treasury Attorney, and I just put my name to it and signed it believing that a senior Government attorney had  done their job in a correct manner. At the same time never exposing the name of corrupt HM Treasury Attorney who prepared and draft the false and fraudulent letter to Valerie Ann Butler dated the 3rd May, 2012 which was not even sent out in hard copy and only emailed to Valerie Ann Butler, knowing that Valerie Ann Butler was in hospital and very sick and more than likely not see he email till it was too late , and he family farm in Haywicks Lane has already by illegally, fraudulently and corruptly and wrongly transferred into the names of two of  the main conspirators  Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.
 
Note
This article may be published word wide in the next seven days, unless there is an injunction ordered by the High Court stopping to publication of this article. Also the INL News Group always likes to send the draft article out to those being written about, so they have a fair right of reply which will be published along side this article, so that everyone concerned with this matter can have their say in public, so the general public can see all sides of the story from everyone’s point of view.
 
INL News Legal and Investigative Team
Email: news:inlnews.com
8th May, 2012
 

Assistant to HM Land Registrar Katharine Brothers, Gloucester HM Land Registrar  Julie Jenkins and top property dispute London Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale join Haywicks Farm Fraud Gang



Urgent Attention:
Katharine Brothers, Assistant HM Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk May, 2012
 
Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke
 
Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers


"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <
MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <
Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <
ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
 
Please see attached High Court Application for your urgent attention:
 
Any attempt by yourselves and/or any staff member of HM Land Registry and/or HM Land Registry to attempt to  be in any way involved with  giving effect to the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart,
 
be bee seen as further attempts by you all to conspire to pervert the course of Justice, conspirsacy to defraud,contempt of court and malefiance of public officers
which are serious civil and criminal wrongs which one of the lost powerful people in the United Kingdom Rebecca Brooks and her husband and helpers have now been charged with, So so not think for a second that anyone in the Treasury Solicitors Office and the powerful Freemasons,
( which my son in law is a member of in Australia, so I know who they are and how they work and the power base they have),
will protect you in the end as a female non Freemason solicitor in the Crown Solicitors Office will end up having no fear in prosecuting you all if they feel that this is necessary
yours kindly
 
Thomas Allwood for the claimants in HC12C00678 Being Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Jouai and Thomas Allwood
Address for service for the Claimants:15 Home Street, Edinburgh, EH3 9JR
In the High Court of Justice Chancery  Division
Claim Number: HC12 C00678
                              and HC11C04156 and HC11C00473
Claimants
Stephen Carew-Reid
Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai
Thomas Allwood
Defendants
HM Land Registry
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart
Antonia Alfresdo Maria Nicolosi and Ruth Helen Nicolosi
Gary Roger Butler/Jouai
Application for Joinder, Application to consolidate claims, contempt of court against Barrister Marie Clair Bleasdale, application for stay of order made by Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012, application to vacate hearing before Master Price in Claim Number: HC11C04156 on the 5th July, 2012 for application to strike out and re-list before a High Court Judged in Chambers on the 24th July, 2012 in Court 10, Rolls Building, Fetta Lane London.
 
Orders Sought:
1.       To have the following parties joined to HC12C00678 for acting in a way that they have conspired to pervert the course of justice and in a conspiracy to defraud the  claimants being Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Butler and Thomas Allwood of the lawful rights in a property  know as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 3QE  and also know as Title Number GR327583 and also known as Title Number GR351346:
 (a) Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale
(b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester
(c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester
(d) Treasury Solicitors. 
                        Particulars of Conspiracy to defraud, conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and malefiance of public officers
 Particulars of the parts played in the conspiracy to defraud will exceed three folios and bet set out at trial of this action, however it is noted that some of the wrongful acts they have committed is to deliberately with wilful intent to harm the claimants have presented false and misleading facts , information and legal arguments in letters and submissions (written and verbal) that have been presented to the High Court of Justice and to the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and other letters to the claimants  and as basis for wrongfully claiming they can by pass a number of current court actions and applications that are pending in the courts in HC12C00678, HC11C04156 and HC11C00473 concerning the rightful ownership and who should rightfully ne registered on the title deed as the registered owner of the property known as Haywicks Farm and a court order made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA3045 by High Court Judge Iyer  which states that HM Land Registry should remove the name of “the said Gary Roger Jouai” from the title deed of the property known as Haywicks Farm, and replace it with Valerie Ann Butler. One of the most serious deliberate false statements made (a)  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors is that  HC12C00678 is not a live action because the lodging fees have not been paid, when they all know from the High Court records that the lodging fee was paid for in cash and that the false story that the lodging fee had not been paid was deliberately made up by (a) Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors as a way of arguing that there was no stay and/or set aside order applied against the orders made by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, because  Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester , Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester , Sarah Canipel acting as Objections Clerk for HM Land Registry had in letters dated 21st and 22nd February, 2012 as authorised agents , servants, and/or otherwise made undertakings on behalf of HM Land Registry that as soon as HM Land Registry are notified that  there is a stay application to stay the orders of Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry made in the court, that HM Land Registry not to give effect to the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart. The main aim of the conspiracy being to make sure that well known Freemason Peter Leslie Urquhart and his well known Freemason Partners who have a great power and influence in the English Legal System , The High Court of Justice, Treasury Solicitors, the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and the Office of the Land Registry end up with control of the title deed of Haywicks Farm in the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart as trustee for their various silent Freemason Partners so they can complete a multi million pound luxury residential development of Haywicks Farm within  the next 20 years with a expected net profit of over 20 million pounds to be shares amongst Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart and their various silent Freemason Partners who include powerful and well connected English solicitors and their families. So, because the issue of HC12C00678 which has asked for a stay and set aside orders against the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, meant that HM Land registry had to honour their undertaking not to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, made in the letters written by   Sarah Canipel acting as Objections Clerk for HM Land Registry on the 21st February, 2012 and Katharine Brothers acting a Assistant to Julie Jenkins the HM Land Registrar for Gloucester on the 22nd February, 2012, HM Land Registry could not legally process  a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, unless they could make up the false claim that the lodging fees for HC12C00678 had not been paid, which if this was true, the HC12C00678 would be stayed until these fees were paid. The making up of the false claim that the court  fees of HC12C00678 had not been paid by the claimants is one of the most serious examples of a conspiracy to pervert the course of Justice and conspiracy to defraud made by HM Land Registry and Treasury Solicitors staff and one of the most well respected property dispute barristers in London, that the English Legal System has seen for long time. It is also noted that Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester , Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester  and  Treasury Solicitor   have committed a common law tort of maleficance of public officers and this can be sued personally for damages as well as in their office as representing HM Land Registry owned by the Government of the United Kingdom and  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale has committed a serious contempt of court as  barrister for knowingly presenting false and misleading information to the court and has breach many of the oaths, rules, undertakings and obligations a barrister in the United Kingdom has to abide by and thus should be struck off from being allowed to practice law in the United Kingdom as wel as pay damages that have been causes y such deliberate and calculated wrongdoing.  For all these reasons there in no doubt that (a)  Barrister Marie Claire Bleasdale (b) Julie Jenkins acting as HM Land Registrar in Gloucester (c) Katharine Brothers, Acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry Gloucester (d) Treasury Solicitors should be joined to  HC12C00678 as defendants to be made to account for such wrong doing and also for the reason that they must be immediately restrained from using their power in HM Land Registry to wrongfully and for an illegal and/or wrongful purpose from being able to give effect to  the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart.
2.       To join and/or consolidate High Court Claims HC12C00678, HC11C04156, and HC11C00473 and 1MAC00473.
3.       Application for a stay to  the orders made the 16th February by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to order HM Land Registry to process a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart, until the full determination and/or carrying out of all applications and claims for orders sought and/or made in HC12C00678, HC11C00415, HC11C00473 and 1MA3045, and/or until further order.
4.       Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant to HM Land Registry, Julie Jenkins Acting asHM  Land Registrar and HM Land Registrty be restrained from  processing a transfer lodged with HM Land Registry on the 27th  January, 2011 by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart for the property known as Haywicks Farm to be transferred from the name of the  said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Ann Urquhart until the full determination and/or carrying out of all applications and claims for orders sought and/or made in HC12C00678, HC11C00415, HC11C00473 and 1MA3045, and/or until further order.
5.       Application lodged by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Urquhart in HC11C004156 to strike out HC11C004156 that has been listed before Master Price on the 5th July, 2012 be vacated and re-listed before High Court Judge in Chambers on the 24th July, 2012 in Court 10, Rolls Building, Fetta Lane, London at the same time as an application to set aside the orders made by Mann J in HC11C00473 has already been listed.
6.       The orders made by Master Price in HC11C04156 on the 10th May, 2012 be set aside on a number of grounds including that fact that the claimant was not served and/or had knowledge of the application that was argued on the 10th May, 2012 in HC11C04156 and was not in attendance in person and/or by legal representative at the hearing before Master Price on the 10the May, 2012in HC11C04156.
7.       That 28 days for service on Valerie Ann Butler of the strike out application by Peter Leslie and Jacqueline Urquhart in HC11C004156 to strike out HC11C004156 and all supported statements of truth and submissions be allowed because Valerie Ann Butler is currently in Australia because she is too sick to return to the United Kingdom at present.
8.       Costs of this application be in the cause.
9.       Any further orders the court feels are just and fair to make.
Dated: 16th May, 2012
Signed
...............................................................................................
Thomas Allwood for the claimants in HC12C00678 Being Stephen Carew-Reid, Valerie Ann Jouai and Thomas Allwood

From 
INL  News Legal and Investigative Team
Email: news@inlnews.com


Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,


Dear Marie


Pleased be advised that as a result of serious defamatory and slanderous statements made by yourself in the High Court of Justice in front of a number of witnesses against Stephen Carew-Reid who is the founder of the INL News Group, who values is integrity  and good name in the highest regard as do others that know him,
we are instructed to let you know that the INL News Legal and Investigative Team are instructed to start preparing a court claim against you for in excess of 100 million pounds in damages for such deliberate and wrongful slanderous and defamatory comments made against Stephen Carew-Reid.
The court transcript will show a correct record of the slanderous and defamatory comments you made against Stephen Carew-Reid which also were designed to damage Stephen Carew-Reid in his trade and profession,
as a qualified management accountant and well known International author of books exposing corruption in the legal community, the courts system, amongst judges-magistrates-masters-adjudicators-court clerks-lawyers-barristers-attorneys-police-politicians-business people-public trustees etc.

Please let us know the best address for service for this court action.

The amount of the damages claim may be lessened if a formal apology is made in writing to Stephen Carew-Reid by sending such signed formal apology to our email address
news@inlnews.com

We look forward to hearing from you in the near future.

The longer you take to provide an formal written signed apology the greater the damages will be.

Yours sincerely


INL  News Legal and Investigative Team
Email: news@inlnews.com


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Your Ref: Haywicks Farm GR327583/D/201/KB
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, May 12, 2012 3:54 am
To: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)"
<clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Katharine Brothers
<Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk, Adjudicator to HM Land
Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, INLNews admin
<news@inlnews.com>



 
From:
David Rosen
INL News Group
 
"David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>,
"INLNews admin" <news@inlnews.com>,
 
12th May 2012
 
Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers


"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order made the 29th December, 2011 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,

Dear Ms Bleasdale
 
I was CC'ed a copy of an email sent to you yesterday from the INL News Editorial Department. This person in the INL News Editorial Department is named David McMillan and happens to have the same Christian name as me. So I wanted to explain to you that this email was not written by me. It was quite out of order for David McMillan to write such as email to you and would not blame you for being offended.
It seems however that you are quite disliked by the editorial department of the INL News Group who have a copy of all the legal files and feel that you have crossed the line on to many occasions by letting too many false and misleading statements to various masters and judges in the High Court of Justice and presented too many false and/or misleading written and verbal submissions and have overall not acted in an honest way in these various court cases and hearings involving the legal disputes over the properties at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey with Ms Pritchard and Haywicks Farm 
with Valerie Ann Butler and have been prepared to act for evil and greedy people who are trying to steal, cheat and/or defraud innocent people like Mr Pritchard and her son Robert Carter and Valerie Ann Butler of their lawful rights to their properties.
Everyone understands that as an Attorney, you are effectively are a "Gun for Hire" so to speak and are entitled to represent the most evil and greedy people in society for a large fee, but what you must not do is cross the integrity line and day after day present false and/or misleading facts and/or law submissions to the court with an attitude that
" I must win at all costs...regardless if I have to tell lies to the court and present false and/or misleading legal and/or factual submissions to the court to win the case for your clients.... and breach every strict oath, obligation rule and standard that I am obligated to operate under when I  was given permission to practice as an attorney in the High Court of Justice and that I am obligated to abide by when I was recently given the great honour of being a part time deputy  judge in the courts.. I am being paid big fees by these greedy evil people and they have given me the chance to have a good lifestyle and buy new cloths and live in an expensive home ... something I could not do before I started working for one the London Jewish Mafia Bosses Nathan Tietelbaum and other powerful Jewish Mafia law and Freemason law firms and litigants..... I know that these people launder millions of pounds.. ...if not billions of pounds ...of black money ..through the London Banks every year  and and make some of their money by cheating and defrauding innocent people like Ms Pritchard, Robert Carter and Valerie Ann Butler ...of their life savings, homes and property... but who cares.... I am being paid large fees to tell false and/or misleading factual and/or legal submissions to the court so I can hoodwink judges and masters into believing that my lies are statements of truth and that my false and/or misleading legal submissions make legal sense based on the lies I tell everyday to the court... and in any event I know that I cannot be caught out because the powerful London Jewish Mafia and Freemasons that I work for make sure that always make sure their unlimited powerful connections in the High Court of Justice will make sure that the Master and/or Judge I appear before for important hearings where I present  my false and/or misleading factual and/or legal submissions make to the court... is a member of the London Jewish Mafia and/or a Freemason, so that the Master and/or judge will always protect me from being exposed for the false and/or misleading legal and/or factual submissions I present and will always make the judgements and rulings in line with what my clients want no matter how wrongful such judgements are,  because the powerful connections that I am paid by in the London Jewish Mafia and the Freemasons will have organised to make sure the right Master and/or Judge will be appointed to hear the case or application that is more than happy to rule on a pre-arranged ruling in favour of my clients regardless of the facts and law that are presented and/or argued before the court and regardless how wrongful in law and/or in fact such judgement is...because the Jewish Mafia and/or Freemason Master and/or Judge know that nothing will ever happen to them regardless of how wrongful the judgement is that they make... and the worst that can happen is that their judgement is overturned by a higher judge and/or appeals court who will simply say that the master and/or Judge was wrong and set their wrongful orders aside.. with them, myself and my clients knowing that most people do not have the time, money, energy, drive, strength and/or legal knowledge to make the right appeal and/or set aside applications and simply just give up at that point ...and walk away with the evil, greedy and powerful London Jewish Mafia and Freemasons getting away with defrauding, illegally, semi-legally, wrongfully, immorally and/or 
corruptly stealing and/or destroying their property and life possession and putting them on the street, with no money , no home and no possessions... as we did to Ms Pritchard and her son Robert Carter..but who cares.. hey I am being coming rich and living  a great life style from the big money these evil and greedy people continue to pay me... with their protection I can continue to  get away with day after day presenting false and misleading factual and legal submissions to the courts and get very well paid for it as well... I do not care where their money comes from and how their obtain it and I am quite happy to help these people get away with fraud and be part of their fraud gang as long they continue to pay me well and protect me with making sure the right  London Jewish Mafia and/or Freemason Master or Judge is appointed to the case by corrupt court listing staff who are also part of the  London Jewish Mafia and/or Freemasons who "when it is important" will make sure the right London Jewish Mafia and/or Freemason Master or Judge is listed to hear the case that will protect me from being exposed for presenting false and misleading submissions to the court and will rule the way of my client's wishes on a pre-arranged and agreed ruling ... yes this is a great system and I am happy to be part if it because I am becoming rich and have been promised if I continue to do as i a told I will appointed a permanent judge in the High Court and will then have provided to me a city and country residence and retire on one of the most amazing pensions available which continues on even after I die... for the benefit od my family... Oh Yes life is great for me since I started working for the London Jewish Mafia and the Freemasons..."
 
Now, I have gone out of my way to try and convince the INL News Group's Editorial Team of that deep down you are a genuine person who has been fooled by the offer of large money from these evil and greedy people who have absolutely no morals and at the same time partly conned by them as to the real truth of some of the matters which you have been presenting them on...
Marie...-Claire I do not think they have told you the whole truth and nothing but the truth to you and all the truthful background on these matters... and are using you to present their false and misleading information knowing that it is you that will be  " the Fall Guy" and in this instance " the Fall Girl".
"when he shit hits the fan" as the saying goes.. as it will very soon on/or before the 24th July, 2012 hearing listed in the High Court of Justice to set aside  the orders of Justice Mann refusing to grant leave to appeal against Master Teverson's decision to order the strike of HC11C00473 on any different grounds which include the fact that Justice Mann is  Freemason and so is Peter Urquhart and so is Master Teverson, and so is Justice Morgan, and so is Justice David Richards, and so is Master Price, who have all crossed their integrity and honesty line and breached their oaths to the court in favour of their oaths they  gave to their Freemason Brothers to corruptly make sure their Brother Freemason Peter Urquhart and his Freemason partners and associates involved with Haywicks Farm, that have a lot to lose if Valerie Ann Butler wins her legal argument to become the registered proprietor of Haywicks Farm and obtains legal possession of Haywicks Farm.
There are a lot of other strong legal ground why Justice Mann's orders and Master Teverson's orders and well as the orders of Justice Norris and Acting Deputy Judge Alison Foster QC and the orders of Justice Paul Morgan..will and must be set aside in the interests of justice and integrity for the court system otherwise the High Court of Justice will be publicly shamed forever and the full story and background of the shameful actions that have been happening inside the Royals Courts of Justice in London  in these cases will no doubt be documented in detail in Stephen Carew-Reid's next volume of his series of books called " The Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching the Watchers?)" that the Australian Weekend News and the INL News Group are due to publish when it is complete later this year which has two of the chapters entitled
"Nightmare in Garratt Close" and "Murder and Fraud in Haywicks Lane" with the INL News internal film script writer currently working on the film scripts of two film of the same names using the outline provided of these two draft chapters. The way these films will be written and produced is that the real names of the guilty exposed in these films will be kept in the film so that the general public will have the opportunity to  judge whether they have acted in a proper way and if found guilty by the general public these people will be publicly shamed forever in these films and in the books shamed for every in books called " The Triumph of Truth (Who Is Watching the Watchers?)" that the Australian Weekend News and the INL News Group, which are held for public record in the National Library in Canberra so they will be on public record for ever...
 
Marie I am pleading with you for your own sake, come over to the side of truth and justice for the ordinary person and your legal career will be saved and I will do my best that you are not publicly shamed by the wrong actions you are have done so far... so of repent and you shall be saved concept and undertake not to help these evil, vile and greedy people who have no morals or integrity whatsoever and just think more money and power is the way to go,, but in the end we are all going to the same place ad as the saying goes
"there is nothing more sure than Death and Taxes and there is no escape from these two things.."
These people cannot take the power and money they have achieved with them when they die... the Pharohs tried this and it never worked..
What these people have forgotten in that they can only eat three meals a day and sleep in one house and in one bed and all this extra money and power does not help them.. other than their ego....
When we die we all leave a statement behind about our life and that is all we leave behind that will last for ever... and it is up to each of use what sort of statement we want to leave behind for the general public to remember us by..
so if you want a good statement left about you. you need to start acting on a good and honourable way... however if the money and power that these powerful and rich London Jewish Mafia and Freemasons who have sold your soul to present  to for money and power have offered and started giving you is more important than leaving a good and honourable statement about your life.. then so be it... Marie..that is your choice... you really have to think about this and it maybe best if you talk about all this with you mum and dad and husband and children if you have any.. and let them help you make the right decision..
 
Please understand and i am doing you a big favour in telling you this as i was told not to warn you, but on the 24th July, 2012 there are a number of 
different matter listed at the same time and they will be heard by a Female non Freemason High Court Judge which have very much the same general theme as well as their individual focused legal and factual arguments. the Broad theme running with all the various applications is that there corruption and wrongful actions are rife in the High Court of Justice and that attorneys and lawyers and their clients are constantly allowed to get away with presenting false and/or misleading information to the High Court of Justice by London Jewish Mafia and Freemason Judges and Masters and there are a number of applications requesting criminal contempt charges to be heard against various powerful attorneys and lawyers for knowingly and deliberately presenting false and/or misleading factual and/or legal submissions to the court and knowingly withholding material information from the courts and/or recklessly not caring whether the information presented to court is the whole truth and noting but the truth to obtain wrongful order for their rich and/or powerful and well connected clients for very large fees or in the case of Treasury solicitors and various attorneys the promise of promotion and/or the promise to make them a magistrate, judge, adjudicator and/or master etc.
One of the applications for criminal contempt that has been listed is an application for David Cameron the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and George Osborne the Chancellor of the United Kingdom and their Treasury attorneys and lawyers to be found guilty of criminal contempt for knowingly and deliberately presenting false and misleading information to the High Court of Justice to have an action struck out which is asking the court to pay up to one billion pounds in damages for David Cameron (the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and George Osborne (the Chancellor of the United Kingdom) as a favour to Rupert and James Murdoch and their powerful News International and News Corporation media group to illegally arrest a well known comedian from the United States at Heathrow Airport because he was coming to Scotland at no payment to help the a group of Scottish musician friends make a pilot of a TV Entertainment Show which was being sponsored by the INL News Group at great cost and expense to make sure the filming, lighting and sound was top standard for use in International television and international films. Rupert and James Murdoch called in a favour from their good friends David Cameron (the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and George Osborne (the Chancellor of the United Kingdom) to make sure the INL News Filming project was not a success without this internationally famous comedian hosting the pilot TV and film project. Then things became much worse for David Cameron (the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and George Osborne (the Chancellor of the United Kingdom)  and their Treasury Attorney and lawyers when they present  an obviously  false document to a High Court Master purporting to be a statement taken by the UK Border Agency from this international comedian stating that the INL News Group had paid his $US2,000 to appear in the Pilot filming project. The comedian never sated this at all to the UK Border Agency Staff and this was a false and made up claim presented by David Cameron (the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and George Osborne (the Chancellor of the United Kingdom) and their Treasury Attorneys and Lawyers to a Master of the High Court of Justice. Then what is worse for them is that the page that contained the false statement that was meant to have been made by this comedian to the UK Border Agency Staff,  which was never made) was presented to the court 
on a blank unsigned UK Border Agency form, that only had the false statement typed on it and had no names, rank and/or serial numbers and/or signatures of any UK Border Agency staff who were meant to have taken down the statement from the comedian. No self respecting Attorney or lawyer would accept instructions from the clients ( and in particular clients such as David Cameron (the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and George Osborne (the Chancellor of the United Kingdom)  to present such an obvious false document to the High Court to help their client David Cameron (the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and George Osborne (the Chancellor of the United Kingdom)  and the UK Government from being sued for up to one billion pounds in damages.
The international media from the USA, Europe, Japan, China, Australia etc are being invited to attend the various applications being heard at the High Court of Justice on the 24th July, 2012 and they will all attend with keen interest with David Cameron (the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and George Osborne (the Chancellor of the United Kingdom)  and their treasury attorneys and lawyers up for a criminal contempt application against them for doing a favour for their publicly known goods friends Rupert and James Murdoch and their all powerful News International and News Corporation Media Group and then when they are sued in the High Court of Justice, they instruct their attorneys and lawyers to put a false a fraudulent document to a Master of the High Court of Justice to try and get the damages claim struck out. 
This is the sort of behaviour that is not expected from anyone, but ever less expected from David Cameron (the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom) and George Osborne (the Chancellor of the United Kingdom) .
There is no doubt that a pack of the International Media will be at the High Court of Justice on the 24th July, 2012 and in any event they will all be in London for the Olympic games.
I would imagine you will be at this hearing representing Freemason Peter Urquharts interests in the set aside application concerning Haywicks Farm applying to set aside Justice Mann and Master Teverson's orders in HC11C00473, so Marie-Claire, this is you chance to become internationally famous.
 
Yours kindly
 
David Rosen
INL News Group
 
"David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>,
David Rosen
INL News Group
 
"David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>,
"INLNews admin" <news@inlnews.com>,



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <news@inlnews.com>
Date: Fri, May 11, 2012 at 8:54 PM
Subject: RE: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
To: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Cc: Radcliffe Clerks Email <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, Adjudicator HM <alr@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, news@inlnews.com




11th May 2012

Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,


Dear Marie

You understand that a barrister such as yourself constantly tells lies in court is a gaolable offense and would be deemed to be act in a manner that is an embarrassment to the legal profession 
and would mean that you could very well be struck off from being practicing as a barrister and also be publicly embarrassed that you may end up lucky to get a job washing dishes or a kitchen hand in a restaurant in Soho

kindest regards

David


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
From: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
Date: Thu, May 10, 2012 1:03 am
To: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Cc: Radcliffe Clerks Email <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Katharine
Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"
<gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
 INLNews admin <news@inlnews.com>

Dear Mr Rosen

I have previously asked you to provide me with your full name and address because your conduct in sending these scandalous emails is in breach of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
I note that you have failed to do so.

Kind regards
Marie-Claire

On 10 May 2012, at 08:57, David Rosen wrote:



Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale, Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,

26th February, 2012


Dear Marie 

I think you have received your final warning to stop presenting false and misleading information ( facts and law) to the court and withholding material information from the court in the Haywicks Farm matter and other matters you are involved with that the INL News Group are involve din helping with.
The Editorial department of the INL News Group are wanting to publicize your wrongful activities which includes so many courts of contempt of court.
They want me to prepare a submission to the Attorney's Board to have to struck off as an Attorney.
The Editorial Department have a particular dislike for Attorneys that are not honest with the court as you have been on so many occasions.
I have been holding back on presenting this report to them because I am still hoping you are going to start to act for honesty and justice rather than dishonesty and injustice.

You have now tried to drag Katharine Brothers into your and your clients fraudulent, immoral, illegal, wrongful and devious scheme to defraud Valerie Ann Jouai her legal rights to Haywicks Farm, by working with corrupt treasury solicitors in preparing false and misleading facts and legal submissions to Katharine Brothers, so repeats these false and misleading  facts and legal submissions and is got herself into a lot of hot water.
You and Katharine Brothers are being used by these powerful greedy Freemasons and London Jewish Mafia brothers and in the end it is your necks on the line not theirs. they are all hiding behind you and Katharine and when it all blows up it is you ans Katharine that are going to cop the blame for it all.

Yours Sincerely

David Rosen
INL News Group


On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 1:31 AM, David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com> wrote:



Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale, Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
High Court of Justice Order  made the 29th December, 2011  in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545 ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for
 the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
news@inlnews.com,
news@newsoftheworld.bz,
admin@awn.bz,
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,

26th February, 2012


Dear Marie

Please note the submissions and serious allegations against yourself and Owen Rhys acting as the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and others acting in what appears to be a criminal conspiracy to defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners in Haywicks

We hereby attach a copy of the Regulatory requirements of Code of Conduct that the Barristers Board have set down for you to operate under and maintain.
Reading the attached submissions that are also attached to HC12C00678 in opposition to your fraudulent, false an misleading submissions presented to Owen Rhys acting a the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry applying for a stay on the orders made by Owen Rhys over the title deed of Haywicks Farm, it is clear you have many times breached  the Regulatory requirements of Code of Conduct that the Barristers Board have set down for you to operate under

Urgent Attention:
Attorney, Marie Claire Bleasdale, senior attorney for Radcliffe Chambers, London
Re: Criminal Contempt of Court Committed by attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale on the 16th February 2012 before Owen Rhys, acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry in Ref No: 2011/0422 over the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, UK.

Also criminal defamation committed by attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale against John Carew-Reid and many false & misleading statements stated by attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale of Radcliffe Chambers to Owen Rhys in writing & verbally at the land adjudication hearing on 16th February 2012 concerning Haywicks Farm.

Note the INL News Legal & Investigative & Editorial Team have following your court & adjudication hearings & appearances in different matters for sometime now & are very shocked & disturbed that you are willing to continue to attend court & or adjudication hearings & try & win those hearings by presenting false information. why?

----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone

------Original message------
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Cc: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, February 26, 2012 7:32:40 AM GMT+0800
Subject: Attachment file INLNews-LegalTeam_Marie_Claire_Beasdale_25th_Feb_2012.

Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,



25th February, 2012



Dear Marie



Please note the submissions and serious allegations against yourself and Owen Rhys acting as the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.



It is time for you and your clients sake to write to the HM Land Registry
to inform the HM Land Registry that your clients, Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart no longer want HM Land Registry to process the transfer of the  property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346 from the said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

It is time that you start using your great legal ability and resources in
helping your clients retrieve the 660,000 pounds sterling back from their
former solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s
former solicitors, Langley Wellington, rather that wasting any more of your clients money and your valuable time, money and energy trying to obtain an unattainable goal of having the property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346 transferred from the said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

We have continually explained to your clients that their right of action is
against their former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson and and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington, who have your clients 660,000. You and your clients and their former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson and and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington, are all well aware that there was an undertaking from the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington to your clients  former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson, that until your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr N Mrs Nicolosi all received good and clear title of the property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346, and all possible legal disputes and/or disagreements, and conditions in the very complex contracts and agreements associated with the attempted sale and attempted purchase of Haywicks Farm,
between Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and the said”Gary Roger Joaui” and the both sets of Attorneys involved, then the two set of purchase monies, 12,000 and 60,000 would not be paid out to the said “Gary Roger Joaui”. We suggest that you have another good read of all the correspondence and agreement files that are between Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and the said “Gary Roger Jouai”^ and two sets of former attorneys, Madge Lloyds Gibson and Langley Wellington, and you see clearly that even though the transfers and contracts had been signed and dated the 13th December, 2011, even as late at the end of February, 2011 the said “Gary Roger Jouai’s” former solicitors Langley Wellington, were making it quite clear that unless certain legal issues were resolved and agreed between the parties, then the two sets of contracts for the proposed and purchase and sale of Haywicks Farm would be declared null and void and the two parts of
Haywicks Farm will revert back to the name of the said “Gary Roger Butler” and the two proposed purchasers, Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi would have their money returned in full.

The quite false story that is being presented to the court and the
Adjudicator

Now, it is also a clear and undisputed fact that, besides that fact that your clients and their attorneys, the estate agents involved with the sale of Haywicks Fram, the Stroud Council, Attorney Simon James Fisher and his legal firm Luttons-Dunford and others involved in the Haywicks Farm deal, Estate of the LATE HERBET Henry Butler etc were well informed from at least November, 2010 onwards of the serious allegations of fraud involving the purported will of the Late Herbert Henry Butler dated January, 1984 and the a forged will and/or not properly executed will, was used to obtain the Grant of Probate naming the said “Gary Roger Jouai” as the sole administrator and beneficiary of the residual Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, but from the 6th January, 2011 onwards, Valerie Butler/Jouai and/or her representatives had placed warning notices over the title deed of Haywicks

Your clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart have not once in the 18 months this has all being going on, asked for their money back from the two sets of
attorneys . (Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington) and/or have showed any willingness and/or  interest in walking away from the proposed purchase of Haywicks Farm and requesting their money back. In fact when the selling agent were approached at the end of November, 2010 about the property by Jamison and Associates, who said that the property was sold. Jamison then said,

 "well we have a buyer for one million pounds, so if the vendor can in any way get out of the deal, then their buyer will be willing to pay 340,000 pounds sterling more than the asking price on the internet,  and if for any reason the vendor can not get out of the sale, then Jamison and Associates buyer will be prepared to pay the buyers, one million pounds for Haywicks Farm, which would be a 340,000 pounds sterling instant profit for them, which is 50% instant return on their original outlay of 660,000 pounds sterling".

 The answer came back that neither the original owner or the new buyer were at all interested in looking at the offer of one million pounds sterling for Haywicks Farm This is all rather odd behavior, if Haywicks Farm was sold for its true value. The reality is that Haywicks Farm being on 26 acres with a two street frontage, ( Haywicks Lane a gazzeted road running between the property), has a strong potential to be approved for the development of a very valuable luxury housing estate with as likely profit from such development approval of over 20 million pound
sterling. That is why the vendor the said “Gary Roger Jouai” and his former attorneys Langley Wellington, made is clear to any interested buyer that he was not in the least interested in selling the property for 660,000 pounds sterling as a straight out sale, where the buyer receives all increases in value from any future development approval, and the cheap price of 660,000 pounds sterling was only available to a proposed purchaser  on the condition that the purchaser agreed to allow an overage deed to be part of the contract of sale where by the purchaser will have to pay the vendor 50% of any increase in valuation of Haywicks Farm in the next 20 years as a result of any development approval on the land that makes up Haywicks Farm.

This means that if  the development of a luxury residential estate was
approved  in say 15 years time that meant the new valuation of the land
comprising of Haywicks Farm was 30,660,000 pounds sterling, then the
Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s would have to pay the said “Gary Roger Joaui” a further 15, million pounds sterling. However on the plus side for the Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s is that they could sell the property to a
property developer for 30,660,000 and walk away with 15.660,000, being 15 million pounds net profit. It is no wonder that the Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s were not in the least interested in taking a small profit of 340,000 pounds sterling ( the Urquarts would have received the lions share of this), there was a lot more profit in it than that. Also it was actually almost impossible for them to on sell the property as a straight sale, as there was no straight purchase ( it was a development partnership agreement), as they would have to on sell their right and obligations in the property which also included the buyer having to agree to take over the responsibilities of the overage agreement.

Now the factual background to all this over the last 30 years shows clearly that the same set of solicitors that were involved with creating the forged and/or not formally witnessed will purportedly dated January, 1984 (Eccletons, whom attorney Simon James Fisher worked for at the time that they used to create the forged and/or not formally witnessed will purportedly dated January, 1984) were also the attorneys for Peter Leslie Ann Jaqueline Ann Urquhart for 30 years. Then when Eggletons were struck off as solicitors by the Legal Complaints Tribunal, all their clients were taken over by Attorneys Mage Lloyd Gibson. Now add the fact that it was Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson that were used to present the quite obviously not formerly executed and/or witnessed will of the Late Herbert Henry Butler purportedly dated January, 1984. to the Probate District Registrar to have the grant of Probate issued in August, 1990 making the said “Gary Roger Jouai” as sole administrator and beneficiary of the residue estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, Then it is attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson that
represents, encourages and guides Peter Leslie Ann Jaqueline Ann Urquhart  on the purchase of Haywicks Farm the whole affair becomes more and more incestuous. Then when Madge Lloyd Gibson is sued as HC11C00473 long with Mr and Mrs Urquhart and others, it is Rickerbys Attorneys whom  Colin Gibson, one of the founder’s of Madge Lloyd Gibson,("Colin Gibson" < colin.gibson@rickerbys.com>) is a partner, that takes up the defense for Madge Lloyd  Gibson, Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  Now neither Madge Lloyd Gibson or Rickerby’s want anything to do with defending either Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  And left them to hang out to dry, because

  "They have too much to cover up. In fact evem Master Teverson said at the first strike out hearing of HC11C00473 that they advised Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi,  to obtain some separate legal and independent advice from Madge Lloyd Gibson and Rickerbys. This was because the Master could see quite clearly that Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi. had a professional negligence claim against Madge Lloyd Gibson if made Lloyd Gibson did not get their 660,000 an 12,000 pounds sterling back.

As much as Valerie Ann Butler would like all this to end, she also would
also quite welcome a full trial of this matter where everyone involved had to give evidence under oath and the whole truth of the matter is brought to light.

If your clients Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart  are not prepared to
withdraw their application from HM Land registry to have the transfer  of
Haywicks Farm lodged on the 27th January, 2011 processed into their name, then could you please respond  as soon as possible to the below submissions in opposition  and response to your submissions handed to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai  for  the first time at the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 before Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry

We look forward to hearing form you on an urgent basis

Yours sincerely


David Rosen, INL News Legal and Investigative Team

Email: “David Rosen” david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com


20th February, 2012


From:

David Rosen, INL News Legal and Investigative Team

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com

david.rosen@inlnews.com



Attention: The HM Land Registrar

Attention:, Katherine Brothers
Deputy Registrar, Land Registry
Tel: 01452 511 790
Attention:, Katherine Brothers, Deputy Registrar, Land Registry
Tel: 01452 511 790
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB

 Adjudicator to the HM Land Registrar
Owen Rhys, Mark Southby
Saru Hargreave
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Care of: Mandy Smart,Listing Team
 Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Courts and Tribunal Services
7th Floor, Victory House, 34 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6EX
Tel: 020 3077 5829 | E-mail: mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
 oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
Re: John Hastings Carew-Reid as Trustee and Attorney for Valerie Ann
Jouai 2) Valerie Ann Jouai  Your Ref: REF/2011/0422


Please see email attaching a Copy of High Courtdecision  sent  today to the HM Land Registrar made the 29th December, 2011  in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545 ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said  "Gary Roger Jouai" and replacing it with "Valerie Ann Butler" of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law, INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com


From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
      Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, davidrosen@inlnews.com


Attention:

Katherine Brothers Deputy Registrar, HM Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

Attention: Katherine Brothers HM Deputy Registrar, Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790, gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order made the 29th December, 2011  in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said  "Gary Roger Jouai" and replacing it with "Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com


Marie Claire Bleasdale is likely to got to jail & lose her license to
pratice law for presenting false facts to Owen Rhys Adjudicator 16th February 2012

"davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com"
<david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.co


*Date:* Thu, Feb 16, 2012 5:01 pm

*To:
<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com
<alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk #
<mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk
<oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
<jbk@bnilaw.com 
news@inlnews.com 
admin@awn.bz
news@notw.bz 
robertjamisonandassociates@gmail.com

Dear Marie,

 Just have spoken to the INLNews jourmalist that attended the hearing today before Adjudicator Owen Rhys and it seems that the editorial people are keen to put a article about your illegal,wrongful, & or immoral activities in the courts and adjudicator hearings.

You seem to keen to become famous for the wrong reasons, to become known on the world stage as a high priced attorney that makes her living from telling lies to the courts & withhold material information from the courts for your clients. Just as you have done today for clients P & J Urquhart by lying in your submissions that there was no order to amend probate of the Estate of Henry  Herbert Butler, when you & your clients are well aware that there is a High Court Order made 29th December  in 1MA30545 by District Judge Iyer," that a new grant of probate be granted to administer the estate of the Late Henry Herbert Butler appointing the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Late Henry Herbert Butler."

 You then withheld presenting a copy of HC11C04156 being a Current High Court Action issued in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division being Valerie Ann Butler Claimant v P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for declarations that the purported land contracts, agreements and overage deeds were of no valid to legal effect and were null and void. You have read the judgment and directions of Master Teverson striking out the original claim HC11C00473 issued by John Carew-Reid as trustee and power of attorney for Valerie Ann Joaui against Gary Roger Joaui and others to try and obtain a judicial determination as to the Valerie Ann Joaui’s rights to Haywicks Farm, which was struck out only for the reason the master Teverson
believed that Mr Carew-Reid did not have the legal right to issue such
action in his own name as Trustee and power of Attorney for Valerie Ann
Joaui, and in fact gave directions in his judgment to Valerie Ann
Joaui/Butler that she should commence a new High Court Claim in her name against P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for
declarations that for declarations that the purported land contracts,
agreements and overage deeds were of no valid to legal effect and were null and void., and a separate claim against the said Gary Roger Joaui to obtain a court order that the original grant of probate granted to the said Gary Roger Jouai had no legal effect and was null and void and a new grant of probate be granted to administer the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointing Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler. and for a further order that “HM Registry of Land Titles  amend the HM Land Registry records for the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said gary Roger Jouai and replacing with Vslerie Valerie Ann Butker as the registered owner of the property known as Haywicks Farm title number GR327583”

(The overage deeds were a term of these contracts and agreements which have the legal effect that these were not normal sales between seller and buyer for all of the rights of the property of Haywicks Farm to be transferred to the buyer, however was in effect a development partnership agreement between the said Gary Roger Jouai and P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi whereby the buyers paid over a very small portion of the potential worth of the Haywicks Farm and that for the next 20 years when the property known as Haywicks Farm is approved for development then the profit and valuation difference between the valuation of the property based
on the development approval and the amounts to be paid over to the said Gary Roger Jouai being 660,000 pounds from Mr and Mrs Urquhart and 12,000 pounds from  Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, would be shared on a 50.50 basis between the said Gary Roger Jouai an Mr and Mrs Urquhart and 12,000 pounds from  Mr and Mrs Nicolosi).

So as a result of Master Teverson’s directions in his judgment striking out HC11C00473 Valerie Ann Butler using her maiden-birth name, in respect to her late father Herbert Henry Butler to keep the Butler Family name on the title deed on Haywicks Farm, as her Husband hade died, issued two new High Court Claims HC11C04156 (still waiting or a trial to be set down for hearing) and 1MA30545 which has been finalized as per court order made the 29th December, 2011 by District Judge Iyer sitting at Manchester District Registry. As attached to this letter which you and you clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi had a copy of on the 14th February, 2011 as posted by guaranteed delivery to your clients on the 13th February, 2012 the day the court extracted the order for the first time, even though it was made the 29th December, 2011, the court having appologised for the delay in extracting the order.

You are well aware that the appeal in HC11C00473 against Master Teverson’s directions in his judgment striking out HC11C00473 has not legally been fully determined with John Carew-Reid as Trustee and Power of Attorney for Valerie Ann Joaui still awaiting for a hearing of the oral leave to appeal hearing application. The judges listing have stated that it is likely that this leave to appeal application will not be listed til sometime in the middle of March, 2012.Then if leave to appeal is refused then we are informed Mr John Carew-Reid will appeal against that decision to the Court of Appeal, and that is likely to take another six months at least to be dealt with, and the Adjudicator to the HM Land registry can not make any orders and/or directions to the HM Land Registry until that appeal processes involving HC11C00473are all fully dealt with and fully determined.

Some of the Factual and Legal issues and problems with summary of facts and summary of law presented by Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale to the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012 in the hearing of Peler Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart applicant and Valerie Ann Jouai and John Carew-Reid Respondents over the property known as Haywicks Farm Title Number GR327583 also known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 9QE.

1.       Section 204- law of property Act 1925- Orders of the Court
Conclusive. So the court order made of the 29th December, 2011 by District Judge Iyer sitting at Manchester District Registry, Civil Justice Centre, 1 Bridge Street, West, Manchester, M60 9DI is completely conclusive and takes complete priority over everything- Thus HM land registry must act on this court order above all other directions from the Adjudicator to the HM Land Registry- Adjudicator has no power to overrule Court order from District Judge Iyer- If Adjudicator is acting in a correct, proper and non corrupt way in carrying out his duties as an adjudicator then the adjudicator has no choice but to instruct the HM land Registry to act on this court order –
Until this order is set aside nothing else can be done by the Applicants-Mr and Mrs   Urquharts to oppose the registration of the title deed of
Haywicks Farm being registered in the name of Valerie Ann Butler- The HM Land Registry must immediately act and register the property known as Haywicks Farm Title Number GR327583 also known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 9QE. Into the name of Valerie Ann Butler.

2.       Land registration Rules 2003/1417-Misellaneous and Special cases death of a proprietor- 162- Transfer by a personal representative (i) an application to register by a personal representative who is not already registered as proprietor, must be accompanied by  a court order appointed the transferor as the deceased personal representative .Thus the court order made by Iyer J in the High Court of Justice, Manchester Registry satisfies this land registration rule because in paragraph 2 of the court order it states:
2.  An order that a new grant of probate be granted to
administer the estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointing the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate if the Late Herbert Henry Butler (ii) The registrar is under no duty to investigate the reasons for transfer of property by a personal representative of a deceased and must assume that the personal representative is acting correctly and within his or her powers which have been given to Valerie Ann Butler in the court order made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545.

3.       Land Registration Rules 2003: 16.If an application is not in order
the registrar may raise such requisitions as the registrar considers
necessary specifying a period (being not les that 20 days) within which the applicant must comply with the requisition. It is noted that attorney Marie –Clair Beasdale has deliberately misrepresented the true facts in her submissions to the adjudicator. Also the HM Land Registrar seems to have breached its duties by only giving 7 days to rectify the requisition given on the first set of UN1 and RX1 notices lodged the 13th January, 2011, when the Land Registration Rules 2003 Rule 16:Applictions Not In order: States: “if an application is not in order the registrar may raise such requisitions as he considers necessary, specifying a period (being not less than twenty business days) within which the applicant must comply with requisitions

4.       Marie-Clair Bleasdale did not mention to the adjudicator that  that
there were serious allegations in the statements of truth filed in the High Court and with the Adjudicator that someone in the HM Land Registry acted in a wrongful, illegal and/or corrupt way in that something wrongful was cdone with the original UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 13th Januray, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm by Valerie Jouai to protect her rightful interests in Haywicks Farm, in that on the HM Land Registry Records it shows they were sent out for requisitions to be complied with to solicitors for Valerie Ann Jouai being Simon Muirhead Burtons at their London address, however such UNI and RX1 Notices never arrived at Simon Muirhead Burtons’ s offices and in fact seem to completely disappeared somewhere between the HM Land Registry and/or they never were sent and just placed in a draw somewhere out of the way and/or were thrown in the bin.
Either way they have never been found. It is understood that the INL News Investigation team have a witness form the HM Land registry woul will appear at any trial of this action that will verify what happened to these UN1 an RX1 notices and that they were lost as a favour for the powerful legal firms in Gloucester being Langley wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson, who fairly well control most of the land registration business in Gloucester and their power base also helped by the fact that one of the main attorneys and partners of Langley Welling is a Deputy Judge and and an assistant coroner in Gloucester and has a lot of power and influence in Gloucester to get anything done he wants done, even if it is wrongful and/or illegal, and thus to get a clerk in the HM Land registry to lose a UN1 and a RX1 Notice and ask for a seven day requisition instead of the statutory  20 business in day requisition request was probably not a very difficult thing to do in consideration they were dealing with Valerie Ann Jouai and her representatives being in Australia handling the matter, and by the time they found out what has happened the title deed of Haywicks Farm would  have been registered in the names of Mr and Mrs Urquhart and all a bit legally difficult to correct. After all the expected development
profit from a luxury development of Haywicks Farm into a luxury residential subdivision was expected to be in excess of 20 million pounds and so there was a lot of money at stake for  the said Gray Roger Jouai ( his real name being Gary Roger Butler not Gary Roger Jouai) and his silent partners being the various legal firms involved and their development company Edgon Estate Limited  and the other development partners Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi. Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson knew they had to
get the first UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged with MH Land Registry disappeared and/or lost otherwise they could not have been able to the title of Haywicks Farm transferred to Mr and Mrs Urquhart by a transferred lodge on the 27th January, 2011, unless there first UN1 and RX notices had lapsed by getting them to disappear and so the 7 day requisition notice could not be complied with and would not even no known about. The reason why Madge Lloyd Gibson waited till the 27th January, 2011 to lodge the transfers of Haywicks Farm, because that was after they assumed the original UN1 and RX1 notices would have been fully lapsed because they had been lost. However their plan failed because the due dilligence  of Deputy Land Registrar Katharine Brothers who was watching a serious fraud alert on the title deed lodged by Reid and Associates and told Reid and associates  on the 14thJanuary, 2011 that the first UN1 and Rx1 Notices had been requisitioned and sent to attorneys Simon Muirhead Burton’s address in London, however it was
quickly ascertained by Reid and Associates that such UNI and RX1 notices never arrived, and thus there was no doubt that they were never sent, sent to the wrong address, and/or put in the bin and a false record of HM Land Registry files stating they had been sent to Simon Muirhead Burton. So action was quickly taken by Valerie Ann Jouai to instructing Reid and Associates to urgently courier over two new replacement UN1 and RX1 notices to replace the ones first lodged on the 13th January, 2011 ( as a continuance of the application notice lodged against Haywicks Farm by Solicitors Simon Miurhead Burton on the 6th January, 20111 for and/or on behalf of Valerie Ann Jouai) and these arrived for lodgment at the HM Land Registry on the 19th January, 2011 and were formally lodged on the 19th January, 2011 by HM Land Registry over the title deed of Haywicks Farm. as replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices, to replaced the UN1 and RX1 Notices that lodged on the 13th January, 2011 that went missing.

5.       Some points of the true outline and time line of facts And Law
that Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not present to the adjudicator in
her written and verbal submissions on the 16th February, 2012: (i) Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that everyone that was concerned in the buying, selling and transferring, conveyancing, etc of the property known as Haywicks Farm including legal firms an attorneys Langley Wellington –Mage Lloyd Gibson – Simon James Fisher – Luttons Dunford, the Stroud Council, Estate Agents Fox-Grant and Vince Pullen, the purported seller of the property the said Gary Roger Jouai and the proposed buyers of Haywicks Farm being Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were all notified and well well aware of the serious allegations form, at least the beginning of December, 2010, (and earlier) that were being alleged against the said Gary Roger Jouai, Attorney Simon James Fisher, Eggletons Solicitors, legal secretary using the name Vivienne Hobbs ( which is a false surname and a false Christian name, the correct Christian name is Vivian, not Vivienne as was used on the fraudulent purported will of the late Herbert Henry Butler purportedly dated January, 1984 and the surname name is not legally Hobbs) and others being involved with a criminal conspiracy to defraud and possibly murder the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the defrauding of the late Herbert Henry Butler’s only child Valerie Ann-Butler of her rights ownership of Haywicks Farm by the use of a fraudulent will and/or not legally witnessed will to obtain a wrongful and/or fraudulent grant of probate for the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler wrongly naming Gary Roger Jouai as the personal representative of the Estate of the late Herbert Henry Butler with the long term purpose of
the said Gary Roger Jouai fraudulently obtaining the title deed of Haywicks Farm into the name of Gray Roger Jouai. This the two purported buyers of Haywicks Farm, being Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and their two legal firms Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson were all well aware of these serious allegations surrounding claiming a criminal conspiracy against the said Gary Roger Jouai and others as to how the title deed of Haywicks Farm was registered in the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai from at least the beginning of December, 2010 and thus the to propose buyers and their solicitors can not claim their clients are innocent third parties in the proposed purchase of Haywicks Farm. It s also noted that
although they were all well aware of such serious allegations of  criminal
nature as to how the said Gary Roger Jouai obtained the title deed of
Haywicks Farm to be registered into the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai, the two buyers of the Haywicks Farm were happy to proceed with the partnership agreement with the said Gary Roger Jouai to development Haywicks Farm through  the contracts/agreements/ Overage Agreement and hand over 660,000 and 12,000 pounds to their solicitors Madge Lloyds Gibson as part of the conditions of the development partnership agreement. The answer as to why they were prepared to do this lies in the fact that the to sets of legal firms involved both gave advice that even if such criminal conspiracy was proven to be true, because of the law of Statute of Limitations, the said Gary Roger Joaui and his partners  including Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi would be able to get away with defrauding Valerie Ann Butler of her rightful ownership in Haywicks Farm.
However even though master Teverson through that legal argument out at the first hearing of the strike out application in HC11C00743 as not legally valid, neither Mr and Mrs Urquhart nor Mr and Mrs Nicolosi have asked their solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson for their money back from the day they alleged they paid the 660,000 and 12,000 pounds to Madge Lloyds Gibson on the 17th December, 2010, and have been more than happy to rely on their various legal teams, now amounting to at least five sets of attorneys involved in advising them, on and off the court record, to bulldoze their way through the3 courts with false, and misleading factual and legal submissions and withholding material facts, with none of the sets of legal teams now being game to be officially on court record anymore for Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, because they are all too scared to be seen officially being responsible for the presenting of false and
misleading information to the court  and want to advice them from behind the scenes.  It is also noted that is is highly unusual that a top attorney like Marie Clair Bleasdale would  risk her whole legal career to come to the adjudicator’s hearing presenting so many false and misleading facts and withholding so much material facts and information. It is also highly unusual that a top Attorney like Marie Clair Bleasdale would take direct instructions form a litigant, rather than take than the litigant giving the instructions to a legal form and then the legal firm instructing Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale. This situation never happens in the legal process.
Attorneys do not take instructions directly form a litigant, they always
take the instructions from a legal firm who then instructs the attorney.
However, it seems that as Marie-Clair Bleasdale was being blamed by her other clients, legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier, who were instructed by Finelend Investments Limited,  for being sue for one billion pounds in
damages by the INL News Group and others with such damages being caused as a result of advice proved by attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale, she became desperate and determined to destroy the chance of Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai obtain her Haywicks Farm back because Valerie Ann Bulter.Jouai was being supported by the INL News Legal  and Investigative Team that were also suporting Janice Pritchard against Bude Nathan Iwanier and their client Fineland Investments Limited  with the INL News Group and other suing Bude Nathan Iwanier and Fineland Investments for one billion pounds in damages.

6.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that there was no
doubt in the evidence filed with the High Court and the Adjudicator that Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, the said Gary Roger Jouai and their legal firms and attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington  and their estate agents Vince-Pullen and Grant-Fox etc  all well know about the serious allegations as to a criminal conspiracy to defraud the late Herbert Henry Butlerand hus only child Valerie Ann Butler of their rights to ownership of Haywicks Farm from at least the beginning of December, 2010 ( and a lot earlier) before contacts were signed between Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, the said Gary Roger Jouai and their legal firms and attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington  and their estate agents Vince-Pullen and Grant-Fox etc   for the proposed sale and purchase of Haywicks Farm and thus Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, can not be considered as innocent third parties to the transactions.

7.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that the proposed
sale and transfer of Haywicks Farm from the said Gary Roger Joaui to Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, was in any respect a normal sale and/or transaction where all present and future rights in Haywicks Farm are transferred to the buyers because the terms of the contacts include a condition that the purchases enter into an overage deed where by 50% of any future increase in value in the next 20 years of Haywicks Farm as a result of any development approval will have to be shared with the said Gary Roger Jouai and the two proposed purchasers Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi on a 50/50 basis, so this is a partnership agreement to develop Haywicks Farm over the next twenty years and not a normal sale transaction.

8.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that did not
mention that the expected new value of Haywicks Farm on 26 acres as prime potential luxury residential development land over the next 20 years would be around 20 million pounds,which is around 30 times the combined price of 672,000 pounds the Hackwicks Farm was being transferred to purchasers Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for.

9.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that that was an
application notice lodged  on the 6th January, 2011 over Haywicks Farm to stop any dealings of the Haywicks Fran title by London legal firm Simon Muirhead and Burton for their Client Valerie Anne Jouai.Butler. and that application notice was renewed three times by London legal firm Simon Muirhead and Burton for their Client Valerie Anne Jouai.Butler  and each time the application notice was renews it was extent for a six day period thus the Application Notice ran for 18 days.from the 6th January, 2011 to the 27thth January, 2011 and was continued on the 13th and 19th January, 2011 by UN1 and RX1 Notices.The the UN1 and RX1 notices lodged13th and 19th January, 2011 took over as a continuance of the Application notice.

10.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that the first set of
UN1 and RX1 Notices that were lodged on the 13th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm did not lapse because they did not comply with the statutory minimum 20 business days required for a requisition notice.
They were accidently and/or deliberately lost, mislaid and/or sent to the wrong address so they were never received by the London legal Firm Simon Muirhead Burton at their londo9n office the address for service for Valerie Ann Jouai.Butler for these UN1 and RX1 Notices.

11.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that there were a
second set of UN1 and RX1 notices lodged on the 19th January, 2001 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to replace the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 13th January, 2011 that were lost. Mislaid and/or sent to the wrong address ( deliberately and/or accidently by a clerk in HM Land registry Office), which were accepted by HM Land Registry as replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices for the 13th January, 2011 ones and as a continuance of the Application Notice lodged over Haywicks Farm on the 6th January, 2011 that continued by three renewals till the 26th January, 2011.

12.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that in any event the replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over the title of Haywicks Farm by Valerie Jouai/Butler on the 19th January, 2011 are still and were still current at the date of the Adjudication hearing on the 16th February, 2011, so even if it was considered that the original set of Un1 and RX1 notices lodged on the 13th January, 2011 had lapsed ( which is argued strongly that
they did not lapse) then the second set of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 19th January, 2011 are still valid and lodged over the title deed of
Haywicks Farm and are a continuance of the Application Notice lodged on the 6th January, 2011.. thus from the 9th January, 2011 onwards and continuing till the 16th February, 2012 and after the 16th February, 2012 there has been a continuing Application and/or UN1 and/or RX1 Notice lodged against the title deed of Haywicks Farm to protect the rights of Valerie Ann Jouai/Butler in the title deed  of Haywicks Farm.

13.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale tried to present a false picture  of
facts to the Adjudicator that the objection to the application to have a
transfer in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart registered on the title deed of Haywicks Farm lodged the 27th January, 2011 was solely based on an email dated 15th February, 2011 from Reid and Associated to the HM Land Registry objecting to the application to have a transfer in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart registered on the title deed of Haywicks Farm lodged the 27th January, 2011 and Part 8 Claim HC11C00473 which was issued on the 2-3-2011 by John Carew-Reid as Trustee and Power of Attorney for Valerie Ann Jouai against various defendants which included Mr and Mrs Urquhart, Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and their solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson, the said Gary Roger Jouai and his solicitors Langley Wellington and others. This presentation of the facts was completely false in that the objection was based on the Application Notice lodged the 6th January, 2011 and the continuance of such Application Notice in the form of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13t and 19th January, 2011 against the title deed of Haywicks Farm. Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were all well aware that the real legal and factual basis  of the objection was originally based on the application notice lodged the 6th January, 2-11 and the continuance of such Application Notice in the form of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 over the title
deed of Haywicks Farm to protect the interests of Valerie Ann Jouai/Butler in Haywicks  Farm, and also now the court order made by Judge Iyer in the Manchester Registry in 1MA30545 the 29th December, 2011 ordering that the title deed of Haywicks Farm be transferred to Valerie Ann Butler ( the maiden and birth name of Valerie Ann Jouai). Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, all know full well that the truth of the matter in that all legal actions issued such as the the first two earlier actions in the Cardiff an Queensland Australia Courts in January, 2011, and the later actions HC11C00473 and HC11C04156 to have the legal rights of Valerie Ann Joaui/Butler in Haywicks Farm determined by the courts, which were just in support of such Application Notice lodged 6th January, 2011 and the continuance of that Application Notice being UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 and not the main basis of the objections. This was a very tricky and clever type fraud on the court by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and was a legal and clever way of presenting  a  false impression to the Adjudicator but a very dishonest thing to do by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale.

14.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not told the truth to
the Adjudicator in her written submissions in paragraph when she falsely
states: “ Gary Jouai’s title to the property derives out of a grant of
probate of the will of Herbert Henry Butler. Gary Jouai being the sole
executor and residuary beneficiary of that will. Herbert Henry Butler died
on 18th February, 1990 and Gary Jouai was granted probate on 21st August,
1990. That Grant of Probate has not been revoked.”  Attorney Marie Clair
Bleasdale’s clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were sent
in the mail on the 13th February, 2011 and also Attorney Marie Clair
Bleasdale  and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi
were at the Adjudicators hearing on the 16th February, 2012 given another
copy of the court order made by from District Judge Iyer sitting in the
achester District Registry on the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 which
states that: (i) “An order that the Grant of Probate dated 21st August,
1990 granted in the High Court of Justice Probate Court of Wales for the
Administration of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler that
appointed the said,’ Gary Roger Jouai’  as the appointed representative of
the Late Herbert Henry Butler be declared null and void and of no legal
effect. (ii) “ An order that a new Grant of Probate be granted to
Administer the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointed the said
Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate of the Late
Herbert Henry Butler..”

15.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not told the truth to
the Adjudicator by not openly declaring to the Adjudicator that she has
been the main legal counsel directly advising her clients Mr and Mrs
Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi in how to lodge a defense in HC11C0456 and also has been advising her clients in great detail as to what to place in their defense and submissions and how to word their defense in HC11C456 and thus knows the full details of HC11C0456. Thus Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale well knows that until the full determination of HC11C0456 and/or until Valerie wants to by her own agreement, the Adjudicator can not legally by pass the determination of HC11C0456, or the pending leave to appeal in HC11C00473 which is still to be heard at an oral hearing, and can not order the removal of the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm and can not order the HM Land Registry to register the transfers from the said Gary Roger Jouai to P L Urquhart an J A Urquhart of the property known as Haywicks Farm.

16.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not instructed the
adjudicator on the law that the order made by District Judge Iyer on the 29
th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 “ordering that the HM Land Registry amend the
title deed of Haywicks Farm to show Valerie Ann Butler as the registered
owner of such property”… is conclusive and can not be interfered with by
the Adjudicator and that the HM Land Registry are forced in law to
immediately act on such court order to immediately register the title deed
of Haywicks Farm in the name of Valerie Ann Butler

17.   It is also noted that Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqeline Ann
Urquhart have deliberately lied to the High Court of Justice and the
Adjudicator when they have stated: (i) They both had no idea and/or
knowledge of any sort prior to the 2nd March, 2011 of the serious
allegations of the said Gary Roger Jouai, legal Firm Eccletons and their
family development company Egton Estates Limited, Legal From Madge Lloyd
Gibson, Legal Firs Luttons Dunford, Attorney Simon James Fisher, Legal Firs
Langley Wellington an others being involved in a criminal conspiracy
started in 1884 to 2010 and continuing to help the title deed of haywicks
Farmto be wrongly and/or fraudulently registered in the name of the said
Gary Roger Jouai., in circumstances that there are a number of statements
on the High Court of Justice files and the Adjudicator files proving
conclusively that these statements are untrue and that the facts that Mr
and Mrs Urquhart and their attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, well knew about such serious allegations of a criminal conspiracy involving Haywicks Farm against the said Gary Roger Jouai from at least the beginning of December, 2010 and as far as their legal firm Madge Lloyd Gibson advising them on the settlement and transfer of Haywicks Farm, they have known about such serious allegations since 1990.

18.   It is also noted that Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqeline Ann
Urquhart have deliberately lied to the Adjudicator when they have stated:  That they do not have formal legal representation and/or help in dealing with the Adjudicator regarding their claimed right to have HM Land Registry process their application dated the 27th January, 2011 to register the transfer the remainder of the property known as Haywicks Farm from the said Gary Roger Jouai to PE and J A Urquhart. They have stated in a statement and submissions to the Ajudicator that the only legal assistance they have has is a little assistance from a friend who is a solicitor, and have given the Adjudicator that they were mainly dealing with the matter themselves without formal legal assistance. The without any warning to Valerie Ann Butler/Joaui, Mr and Mrs Urquhart appear with Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale , who is one of the top attorneys in London that specialises in land argument matters, to appear for them against an old very sick old lady in her 70’s (Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai) before the Adjudicator on the 16th
February, 2012, with well researched and detailed legal and factual
submissions that obviously took a number of weeks to research and put
together because of the great detail in them and were not a last minute
rushed set of submissions. Valerie An Butler/Jouai  is a very frail sick
old lady in her 70’s that known noting about the a law and how the argue
her rights who has travelled all the way from Australia for the hearing,
even though she is English by birth and spent the first half of her life in
England.

19.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale came armed with a well researched and
detailed set of factual and legal submissions at the hearing before the
Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012 which had never been seen before by
Valerie Ann Butler Jouai, who though she was going to attend a friendly
sort of adjudication hearing where she and the Urquharts were going to
speak for themselves in lay mans terms and try and sort things out on a
friendly basis. Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai was not even given an adjournment to be able to be try and read and understand such detailed factual and legal submissions prepared by one of the top Attorneys in  that specialises in land an property arguments . Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai this had no chance to respond to the detailed legal and factual submissions, let alone even had a chance to read them. The fact that such legally and factually detailed and complex submissions were presented against Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai an only first given to her at the hearing and not the normal at least 24 hours before, which is a standard minimum, and when there is a top Attorney against a frail old sick lady who knows nothing about the law, the such detailed factual and legal submission should have been provided at least seven days before the hearing date to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai. Civil law is not meant be won by ambushing the opponent. The whole concept of
civil law is for each side to present their factual and legal submissions
and arguments to the other side to give the other side a chance to respond
to these factual and legal arguments, to find out where they agree or
disagree on the facts and were they agree or disagree on the law. Then when
there is a disagreement of the facts and the law then it is then up to the
adjudicator, magistrate, judge etc to hear the evidence on the facts form
all parties and decide what the true facts are and then adjudicate on the
law based on these settled facts. That is why all sides are obligated under
the riles in civil hearings of any kind to provide the facts and law they
are going to rely on at the hearing to their opponent at the earliest
opportunity as possible as soon as they are prepared. If detailed,
statements, and factual and legal submissions are given at the hearing
without notice to the other side the adjudicator, magistrate, judge etc
hearing the matter is duty bound to adjourn the hearing to another date to give  the opponent to chance to read, understand and respond to these last submissions. The adjudicator failed in his duty in not giving and adjournment to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai to respond to these last minute detailed legal and factual submissions presented to her for the first time at the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale. Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale should have appologised to the Adjudicator and Valerie Ann Butelr/Jouai for the late service of her submissions and actual herself insisted that there be an adjournment to the adjudication hearing to give Valerie Ann Butelr/Jouai a chance to obtain some legal avice on Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale’s very detailed factual and legal submissions.

20.   It is noted that had there been an adjournment to the proceedings
before the Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012 to another date, then
Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai would have had the opportunity to ask the free
help of the INL News Legal Team, as she has done now, to read and analyse the detailed factual and legal submission presented  by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale an have the INL news Legal and Investigation Team respond to them for her. Thus by the time of the next hearing date all the falsities, misleading statements and withholding of material facts and misleading submissions , misleading time line would have been exposed in written submissions in opposition as they have now been exposed is these submissions.

21.   It is also note that it was false for Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale
to state in her verbal and written submissions that the leave to appeal
application in Hc11C00473 has been finally determined when in actual fact John Carew-Reid is expecting a hearing date to be set in about the middle of March,2012 for an oral hearing to argue leave to appeal the decision oMaster Teverson to strike out claim HC11C00473.

22.

*23. **David Rosen*

*Attorney at Law*

*INL News Legal and Investigative Team*

----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone

------Original message------
From: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
To: "davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com" <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Cc: "alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk" <alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk>,"
mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk" <mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk>,"
oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk" <oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,"
jbk@bnilaw.com" <jbk@bnilaw.com>,"Radcliffe Clerks Email" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Date: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:33:12 PM GMT+0000
Subject: Re: Marie_claire bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her
license to pratice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator
16th February 2012

Dear Mr Rosen

Please supply me with your full name and address. If you continue to send these threatening emails I will involve the police.

Kind regards
Marie-Claire Bleasdale

On 16 Feb 2012, at 19:08, "davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com" <
david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sent from my Nokia Phone
>
> ------Original message------
> From: davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
> To: "MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com
>
> Date: Thursday, February 16, 2012 6:59:02 PM GMT+0000
> Subject: Marie_Claire Bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her
license to practice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator
16th feb2012
>
> Dear Marie-ClairBleasdale

, the INL News Group have given so many warnings to stop presenting false
information to the courts & adjudicators on behalf of your clients to
obtain fraudulent & or wrongful court orders for your clients. The INL News
journalist /actor Today reported that you have lied again. You have to
write to the adjudicator & request his orders to be cancelled because you
deliberately lied in your written submissions presented to Adjudicator  Owen
Rhys & withheld material information. P2 of submissions false & you did not
mention hc11c04156 which P & U Urquhart have stated you advised them on as
they have requested your costs to be paid to the court. You have been given
the court cases showing you will end up in jail & lose your license to
practice law for the criminal contempt you committed today. The INL News
Group have gone easy on you up to now because you are female & not a
freemason. However the INL News group's patience is running. The editors of
various INL News websites as well > Yours sincerely David Rosen
>
> ----------
> Sent from my Nokia Phone
>
>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011 Your Ref:
REF/2011/0422
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, February 17, 2012 2:07 am
To: John stolarczyk <john.stolarczyk@bigpond.com>
Cc: Martin Chapman <martinchapman542@hotmail.com>


 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *David Rosen* <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:10 AM
Subject: HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011 Your Ref:
REF/2011/0422
To: Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>



Copy of High Court sent today to the HM Land Registrar



Attention:

Owen Rhys, Mark Southby
Saru Hargreave
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Care of:
Mandy Smart
Listing Team
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Courts and Tribunal Services
7th Floor, Victory House, 34 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6EX
Tel: 020 3077 5829 | E-mail: mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
 oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
Re: John Hastings Carew-Reid as Trustee and Attorney for Valerie Ann
Jouai 2) Valerie Ann Jouai  Your Ref: REF/2011/0422





Please see email attaching a Copy of High Court sent today to the HM Land
Registrar

 made the 29th December, 2011

 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.



Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com

.

From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
      Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, davidrosen@inlnews.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=14dae934082130bd2c04b8eeb78f


Attention:

Katherine Brothers

Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

Attention:

Katherine Brothers

Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com



Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com
Urgent Attention:

Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale

Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

CC:  Deputy Registrar


Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB 
High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583* \

CC:
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, 
news@inlnews.com, 
news@newsoftheworld.bz, 
admin@awn.bz, 
tony.standen@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, 

26th February, 2012



Dear Marie

Please note the submissions and serious allegations against yourself and Owen Rhys acting as the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and your clients
Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and others acting in what appears to be a criminal conspiracy to defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners in Haywicks

We hereby attach a copy of the Regulatory requirements of Code of Conduct that the Barristers Board have set down for you to operate under and maintain.
Reading the attached submissions that are also attached to HC12C00678 in opposition to your fraudulent, false an misleading submissions presented to Owen Rhys acting a the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry applying for a stay on the orders made by Owen Rhys over the title deed of Haywicks Farm, it is clear you have many times breached  the Regulatory requirements of Code of Conduct that the Barristers Board have set down for you to operate under and maintain. We would image the best course of action is for an application should be made to the Bar Standards Board to ask them to remove your license to practice as a Barrister in England and Wales so you cannot kept carrying on in the deceitful and wrongful way using your good name as a barrister and a recorder who acts as a crown Court Judge five week a years to try and convince adjudicators, magistrate, and judges that the fabrications, falsities and misrepresentations that you present at the bar table are true. 
The whole of the English Court System relies on Barrister, Attorneys and Solicitors telling the truth at the bar table and not presenting false and misleading information. When you obtained a license to practice as a barrister you swore an oath to always tell the truth at the bar table in your written and verbal submissions. You have clearly deliberately beached that oath for the payment of a large fee for your clients and in doing so have breached your clear duty to the court and/or land adjudication process (which is a type of court)  which are set out in red below.
The INL News Legal, Investigative and Editorial Team are at present looking through your files to see whether they should:

(a) prepare and issue a High Court Criminal Contempt of Court Application against you for orders 
(i)  to have your license to practice as an attorney/barrister removed; 
(ii) for your imprisonment and/or
(iii)  a heavy fine and damages against yourself  that have have been caused as a result of your deliberately criminal contempt in knowingly preparing and presenting false and misleading factual and legal submissions to Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Registry on the 16th February, 2012 in the Haywicks Farm Matter.
Of course your criminal type behaviour in clear breach of your duties to the court as a practicing attorney/barrister does not excuse Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, and HM Land Registry in their criminal type involvement with in this matter with they also well knowing that your submissions were false and misleading and that the factual basis on which the the order made by Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012 in file reference 2011/0422- known as the Haywicks Farm Matter is based on false facts and false submissions presented by yourself, which not only you knew to be false, but also Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Urquhart  knew to be false. That is why it is alleged that yourself, Owen Rhys Acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Urquhart  and others are all involved in a criminal type conspiracy to defraud Valerie Ann Butler and her partners Thomas Allwood and Stephen Carew-Reid ( the author of the well known series of books "The Triumph of Truth ( Who is Watching The Watchers?" that specialise in exposing corrupt, criminal, illegal, immoral and/or wrongful behaviour in the legal, political, business, and police systems throughout the world, and particular wrongful behaviour by attorneys, barristers, solicitors, magistrates, judges, adjudicators because if they are allowed to get with wrongful an/or corrupt type behaviour then the whole integrity of the English Law System will break down), of the rightful and lawful rights in Haywicks Farm,

(b) Make a formal complaint about your criminal type behaviour to the Bar Standards Board,

and/or

(c) expose your criminal type behaviour in news articles in world wide websites 
with a news headline
High Priced Star Radcliffe Chambers London Attorney Marie-Claire Bleadale well paid to tell lies in court for her clients and breaches her duty to the court not act in a dishonest or otherwise discreditable manner as a Attorney/barrister and breached her overriding duty as an Attorney/Barrister  to the Court to act with independence in the interests of 
justice and to assist the Court in the administration of justice and duty not to deceive or knowingly or recklessly mislead the Court.

and put you in the shame file in the next volume of Stephen Carew-Reid's "The Triumph of Truth ( Who is Watching The Watchers?" that specialise in exposing corrupt, criminal, illegal, immoral and/or wrongful behaviour in the legal, political, business, and police systems throughout the world, and particular wrongful behaviour by attorneys, barristers, solicitors, magistrates, judges, adjudicators because if they are allowed to get with wrongful an/or corrupt type behaviour then the whole integrity of the English Law  

PART III  -  FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
Applicable to all barristers
301. A barrister must have regard to paragraph 104 and must not:
(a) engage in conduct whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise which is:
(i) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister;
(ii) prejudicial to the administration of justice; or
(iii) likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession or the administration of justice or 
otherwise bring the legal profession into disrepute;
(b)  engage directly or indirectly in any occupation if his association with that occupation may 
adversely affect the reputation of the Bar or in the case of a practising barrister prejudice his ability 
to attend properly to his practice.
Applicable to practising barristers
302. A barrister has an overriding duty to the Court to act with independence in the interests of 
justice: he must assist the Court in the administration of justice and must not deceive or knowingly 
or recklessly mislead the Court.

MARIE....
What happens next is entirely in your court.
It is not the aim of the INL News Group to destroy a well respected and talented attorney/barrister such as yourself. in particular because you are a female and this not a Freemason and the English Legal System needs more female non Freemason Attorneys/Barristers to create a balance of power in the legal system that has been for centuries controlled by mainly male Freemasons.
Marie you have been well paid and used by senior Feemasons such as Peter Urquhart and his legal Freemason partners and associates involved with helping Peter Uquhart defraud Valerie An Butler and her partners Thomas Allwood and Stephen Carew-Reid of their rightful and lawful ownership of Haywicks Farm. You have been also used by other senior Freemasons in the Janice Pritchard cases over the fight over ownership and possession of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey that has now caused Stephen Carew-Reid, the INL News Group, Thomas Allwood, Fusako Tusji and the other partners in the planned Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show to sue your clients for one billion pounds in damages for being responsible for the loss of unreplaceable film, video and music files from 1 Garratt Close, Bedington, Surrey, London, that were to be used in the production of the planned Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show.
We appreciate and understand that the pressure and blame has been out on you for the legal advice you provided to Attorneys- Bude Natham Iwanier, and their clients Fineland Investments Limited, Nathan Tietelbaum and others that has caused them to all to be sued as being jointly and severally liable for the one billion pounds sterling in damages claimed against them by  Stephen Carew-Reid, the INL News Group, Thomas Allwood, Fusako Tusji and the other partners in the planned Fringe Shows Have Talent TV Show. That is why you felt the only way out was to set a plan in place to try and destroy anyone connected with the INL News Group and who might use their assets for legal fees to help fight your clients in the courts and thus you thought by presenting a lot of false and misleading submissions to Owen Rhys, acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012, knowing you had Owen Rhys, a corrupt Freemason Adjudicator hearing the case, who even know he knew a lot of what you presented on the 16th February, 2012 was false and misleading,  you would make sure that Valerie Ann Jouai and her partners in Haywicks Farm being Stephen Carew-Reid and Thomas Allwood who are founding members and shareholders of the INL News Group who lose Haywicks Farm which has potential development value of  over 20 million pounds sterling, and make sure Peter Leslie Urquhart and his fellow Freemason Partners end up with Haywicks Farm after plotting and scheming a criminal conspiracy since the early 1980's to illegally, unlawfully and/or wrongfully obtaining the ownership of Haywicks Farm.
We will leave things up to you to see what happens next in this sordid affair.

Yours Sincerely

INL News Legal, Investigative,
 and Editorilal Team
and

WIJAT
WeekendNews
 Investigative 
Journalistic 
Action 
Team


http://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/regulatory-requirements/the-code-of-conduct/ 

http://www.barstandardsboard.org.uk/media/1353125/word_version_of_full_code_of_conduct___annexes_jan_2012_.pdf 

PART III  -  FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
Applicable to all barristers
301. A barrister must have regard to paragraph 104 and must not:
(a) engage in conduct whether in pursuit of his profession or otherwise which is:
(i) dishonest or otherwise discreditable to a barrister;
(ii) prejudicial to the administration of justice; or
(iii) likely to diminish public confidence in the legal profession or the administration of justice or 
otherwise bring the legal profession into disrepute;
(b)  engage directly or indirectly in any occupation if his association with that occupation may 
adversely affect the reputation of the Bar or in the case of a practising barrister prejudice his ability 
to attend properly to his practice.
Applicable to practising barristers
302. A barrister has an overriding duty to the Court to act with independence in the interests of 
justice: he must assist the Court in the administration of justice and must not deceive or knowingly 
or recklessly mislead the Court.
303. A barrister:
(a) must promote and protect fearlessly and by all proper and lawful means the lay client's best 
interests and do so without regard to his own interests or to any consequences to himself or to any 
other person (including any colleague, professional client or other intermediary or another barrister, 
the barrister’s employer or any Authorised Body of which the barrister may be an owner or 
manager); 
(b) owes his primary duty as between the lay client and any other person to the lay client and must 
not permit any other person to limit his discretion as to how the interests of the lay client can best 
be served;
(c) when supplying legal services funded by the Legal Services Commission as part of the Community 
Legal Service or the Criminal Defence Service owes his primary duty to the lay client subject only to 
compliance with paragraph 304.
304. A barrister who supplies legal services funded by the Legal Services Commission as part of the 
Community Legal Service or the Criminal Defence Service must in connection with the supply of such 
services comply with any duty imposed on him by or under the Access to Justice Act 1999 or any 
regulations or code in effect under that Act and in particular with the duties set out in Annex E.

305.1.  A barrister must not in relation to any other person (including a  client or another barrister or 
a pupil or an employee or a student  member of an Inn of Court) discriminate  directly or indirectly  because of race, colour, ethnic or national origin, nationality,  citizenship, sex, sexual orientation, 
marital status, disability, age,  religion or belief.

305.2.  A barrister must not in relation to any other person, victimise  that person for carrying out a 
protected act as defined in the   relevant legislation .

305.3. Deleted from 1st October 2005.
306. A barrister is individually and personally responsible for his own  conduct and for his 
professional work: he must exercise his own  personal judgement in all his professional activities. 
307. A barrister must not:
(a) permit his absolute independence integrity and freedom from external pressures to be 
compromised;
(b) do anything (for example accept a present) in such circumstances as may lead to any inference 
that his independence may be compromised;
(c) compromise his professional standards in order to please his client the Court or a third party, 
including any mediator ;
(d) give a commission or present (save for small promotional items ) or lend any money for any 
professional purpose to or (save as a remuneration in accordance with the provisions of this Code) 
accept any money by way of loan or otherwise from any client or any person entitled to instruct him 
as an intermediary;
(e) make any payment (other than a payment for advertising or publicity permitted by this Code or in 
the case of a self-employed barrister remuneration paid to any clerk or other employee or staff of 
his chambers) to any person for the purpose of procuring professional instructions;

Provided that nothing in paragraph 307(d) or (e) shall prevent a barrister from paying a reasonable 
fee or fees required by an alternative dispute resolution body that appoints or recommends persons 
to provide mediation, arbitration or adjudication services, or from entering into a reasonable feesharing arrangement required by such a body, if the payment or arrangement is of a kind similar to 
that made by other persons who provide such services through the body;
(f) Deleted from 26th March 2010.
PART IV – SELF EMPLOYED BARRISTERS 
Instructions
401 A self-employed barrister whether or not he is acting for a fee:
(a) may supply legal services only if appointed or instructed by a Court  or if instructed:  [1]
(i) by a professional client; or
(ii) by a licensed access client, in which case he must comply with the Licensed Access Rules 
(reproduced in Annex F1); or
(iii) subject to paragraph 204(c), by or on behalf of any other lay client, in which case he must comply 
with the Public Access Rules (reproduced in Annex F2); or
(b) must not in the course of his practice, except as permitted by the Public Access Rules:
(i) undertake the management administration or general conduct of a lay client's affairs;
(ii) conduct litigation (for example issuing any claim or process or instructing any expert witness or 
other person on behalf of his lay client or accepting personal liability for the payment of any such 
person) and must not conduct correspondence or other work involving other parties save as 
permitted by rule 401A below.
(iii) conduct a case in court if the barrister has previously investigated or collected evidence for that 
case unless the barrister reasonably believes that the investigation and collection of that evidence  is 
unlikely to be challenged.
(iv) attend at a police station without the presence of a solicitor to advise a suspect or interviewee as 
to the handling and conduct of police interviews unless the barrister has complied with such training 
requirements as may be imposed by the Bar Standards Board in respect of such work.
(v) act as a supervisor for the purposes of section 84(2) of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999.
(vi) Conduct in court any criminal proceedings in which the barrister has attended at a police station 
for any defendant in connection with those proceedings or any associated proceedings unless the 
barrister reasonably believes that nothing said, done, heard or seen by the barrister at the police 
station might require him/her to give evidence in those proceedings.
Conduct of correspondence
401A.1    If instructed to do so, a self-employed barrister may conduct  correspondence with other 
parties (in the form of letters, faxes,  emails or the like) provided that the barrister:
(a) is satisfied that it is in the lay client’s best interests that    the barrister does so and that he has 
adequate systems, experience and resources for managing appropriately such correspondence; and;  (b) has adequate insurance cover in the event that the lay client suffers any loss arising from the 
conduct of the correspondence for which the barrister is responsible.
401A.2   Where a barrister conducts such correspondence and is aware that another party has a solicitor or barrister representing that party, the barrister must not correspond directly with that 
party.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:35 AM
Subject: Criminal contempt of court by attorney Marie_Claire Beasdale 16thfeb2012
To: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>



Urgent Attention: attorney, marie claire bleasdale, senior attorney for radcliffe chambers, london re: criminal contempt of court committed by attorney marie clair bleasdale on the 16th feb 2012 before owen rhys, acting as adjudicator to hm land registry in ref no: 2011/0422 over the property known as haywicks farm, haywicks lane, hardwicke, gloucester, uk. Also criminal defamation committed by attorney marie clair bleasdale against john carew-reid and many false & misleading statements stated by attorney marie clair bleasdale of radcliffe chambers to owen rhys in writing & verbally at the land adjudication hearing on 16th feb 2012 concerning haywicks farm. Note the inl news legal & invest igative & editorial team have following your court & adjudication hearings & appearances in different matters for sometime now & are very shocked & disturbed that you are willing to continue to attend court & or adjudication hearings & try & win those hearings by presenting false information. why?

----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone

------Original message------
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Cc: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Sunday, February 26, 2012 7:32:40 AM GMT+0800
Subject: Attachment file INLNews-LegalTeam_Marie_Claire_Beasdale_25th_Feb_2012.

Urgent Attention: Attorney Marie Caire Bleasdale, Radcliffe Chambers

"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
"William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,

25th February, 2012

Dear Marie


Please note the submissions and serious allegations against yourself and Owen Rhys acting as the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

It is time for you and your clients sake to write to the HM Land Registry
to inform the HM Land Registry that your clients, Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart. no longer want HM Land Tegistry to process the transfer of the  property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346 from the said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

It is time that you start using your great legal ability and resources in
helping your clients retrieve the 660,000 pounds sterling back from their
former solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s
former solicitors, Langley Wellington, rather that wasting any more of your clients money and your valuable time, money and energy trying to obtain an unattainable goal of having the property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346 transferred from the said “Gary Roger Jouai” to the name of Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.

We have continually explained to your clients that their right of action is
against their former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson and and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington, who have your clients 660,000. You and your clients and their former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson and and/or the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington, are all well aware that there was an undertaking from the said Gary Roger Joaui’s former attorneys, Langley Wellington to your clients  former attorneys Madge Lloyds Gibson, that until your clients Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr N Mrs Nicolosi all received good and clear title of the property known as  Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 8QE, and also known as title number GR327583 and also known as title number GR351346, and all possible legal disputes and/or disagreements, and conditions in the very complex contracts and agreements associated with the attempted sale and attempted purchase of Haywicks Farm, between Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and the said”Gary Roger Joaui” and the both sets of Attorneys involved, then the two set of purchase monies, 12,000 and 60,000 would not be paid out to the said “Gary Roger Joaui”. We suggest that you have another good read of all the correspondence and agreement files that are between Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and the said “Gary Roger Jouai”^ and two sets of former attorneys, Madge Lloyds Gibson and Langley Wellington, and you see clearly that even though the transfers and contracts had been signed and dated the 13th December, 2011, even as late at the end of February, 2011 the said “Gary Roger Jouai’s” former solicitors Langley Wellington, were making it quite clear that unless certain legal issues were resolved and agreed between the parties, then the two sets of contracts for the proposed and purchase and sale of Haywicks Farm would be declared null and void and the two parts of
Haywicks Farm will revert back to the name of the said “Gary Roger Butler” and the two proposed purchasers, Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi would have their money returned in full.

The quite false story that is being presented to the court and the
Adjudicator

Now, it is also a clear and undisputed fact that, besides that fact that
your clients and their attorneys, the estate agents involved with the sale of Haywicks Farm, the Stroud Council, Attorney Simon James Fisher and his legal firm Luttons-Dunford and others involved in the Haywicks Farm deal, Estate of the LATE HERBET Henry Butler etc were well informed from at least November, 2010 onwards of the serious allegations of fraud involving the purported will of the Late Herbert Henry Butler dated January, 1984 and the a forged will and/or not properly executed will, was used to obtain the Grant of Probate naming the said “Gary Roger Jouai” as the sole administrator and beneficiary of the residual Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, but from the 6th January, 2011 onwards, Valerie Butler/Jouai and/or her representatives had placed warning notices over the title deed of Haywicks

Your clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart have not once in the 18 months this has all being going on, asked for their money back from the two sets of
attorneys . (Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington) and/or have showed any willingness and/or  interest in walking away from the proposed purchase of Haywicks Farm and requesting their money back. In fact when the selling agent were approached at the end of November, 2010 about the property by Jamison and Associates, who said that the property was sold. Amison then said, well we have a buyer for one million pounds, so if the vendor can in any way get out of the deal, then their buyer will be willing to pay 340,000 pounds sterling more than the asking price on the internet,  and if for any reason the vendor can not get out of the sale, then Jamison and Associates buyer will be prepared to pay the buyers, one million pounds for Haywicks Farm, which would be a 340,000 pounds sterling instant profit for them, which is 50% instant return on their original outlay of 660,000 pounds sterling. The answer came back that neither the original owner or the new buyer were at all interested in looking at the offer of one million pounds sterling for Haywicks Farm This is all rather odd behavior, if Haywicks Farm was sold for its true value. The reality is that Haywicks Farm being on 26 acres with a two street frontage, ( Haywicks Lane a gazzeted road running between the property), has a strong potential to be approved for the development of a very valuable luxury housing estate with
a likely profit from such development approval of over 20 million pound
sterling. That is why the vendor the said “Gary Roger Jouai” and his former attorneys Langley Wellington, made is clear to any interested buyer that he was not in the least interested in selling th4 property for 660,000 pounds sterling as a straight out sale, where the buyer receives all increases in value from any future development approval, and the cheap price of 660,000 pounds sterling was only available to a proposed purchaser  on the condition that the purchaser agreed to allow an overage deed to be part of the contract of sale where by the purchaser will have to pay the vendor 50% of any increase in valuation of Haywicks Farm in the next 20 years as a result of any development approval on the land that makes up Haywicks Farm.
This means that if  the development of a luxury residential estate was
approved  in say 15 years time that meant the new valuation of the land
comprising of Haywicks Farm was 30,660,000 pounds sterling, then the
Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s would have to pay the said “Gary Roger Joaui” a further 15, million pounds sterling. However on the plus side for the Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s is that they could sell the property to a
property developer for 30,660,000 and walk away with 15.660,000, being 15 million pounds net profit. It is no wonder that the Urquharts and the Nicolosi’s were not in the least interested in taking a small profit of 340,000 pounds sterling ( the Urquarts would have received the lions share of this), there was a lot more profit in it than that. Also it was actually almost impossible for them to on sell the property as a straight sale, as there was no straight purchase ( it was a development partnership agreement), as they would have to on sell their right and obligations in the property which also included the buyer having to agree to take over the responsibilities of the overage agreement.

Now the factual background to all this over the last 30 years shows clearly that the same set of solicitors that were involved with creating the forged and/or not formally witnessed will purportedly dated January, 1984 (Eccletons, whom attorney Simon James Fisher worked for at the time that they used to create the forged and/or not formally witnessed will purportedly dated January, 1984) were also the attorneys for Peter Leslie Ann Jaqueline Ann Urquhart for 30 years. Then when Eggletons were struck off as solicitors by the Legal Complaints Tribunal, all their clients were taken over by Attorneys Mage Lloyd Gibson. Now add the fact that it was Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson that were used to present the quite obviously not formerly executed and/or witnessed will of the Late Herbert Henry Butler purportedly dated January, 1984. to the Probate District Registrar to have the grant of Probate issued in August, 1990 making the said “Gary Roger Jouai” as sole administrator and beneficiary of the residue estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, Then it is attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson that
represents, encourages and guides Peter Leslie Ann Jaqueline Ann Urquhart  on the purchase of Haywicks Farm the whole affair becomes more and more incestuous. Then when Madge Lloyd Gibson is sued as HC11C00473 long with Mr and Mrs Urquhart and others, it is Rickerbys Attorneys whom  Colin Gibson, one of the founder’s of Madge Lloyd Gibson,("Colin Gibson" < colin.gibson@rickerbys.com>) is a partner, that takes up the defense for Madge Lloyd  Gibson, Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  Now neither Madge Lloyd Gibson or Rickerby’s want anything to do with defending either Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  And left them to hang out to dry, because......

  "They have too much to cover up. In fact evem Master Teverson said at the first strike out hearing of HC11C00473 that they avised Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi.  To obtain some separate legal and independent advice from Madge Lloyd Gibson and Rickerbys. This was because the Master could see quite clearly that Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart   and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi. had a professional negligence claim against Madge Lloyd Gibson if made Lloyd Gibson did not get their 660,000 an 12,000 pounds sterling back.

As much as Valerie Ann Butler would like all this to end, she also would
also quite welcome a full trial of this matter where everyone involve had
to give evidence under oath and the whole truth of the matter is brought  light.


If your clients Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart    are not prepared to
withdraw their application from HM Land registry to have the transfer  of
Haywicks Farm lodged on the 27th January, 2011 processed into their name, then could you please respond  as soon as possible to the below submissions in opposition  and response to your submissions handed to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai  for  the first time at the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 before Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry

We look forward to hearing form you on an urgent basis

Yours sincerely


*David Rosen*

*INL News Legal and Investigative Team*

Email: “David Rosen” david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com


20th February, 2012


From:, David Rosen, INL News Legal and Investigative Team

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com

david.rosen@inlnews.com


Attention: The HM Land Registrar

Attention:, Katherine Brothers
Deputy Registrar, Land Registry
Tel: 01452 511 790
Attention:, Katherine Brothers, Deputy Registrar, Land Registry
Tel: 01452 511 790
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB

 Adjudicator to the HM Land Registrar
Owen Rhys, Mark Southby
Saru Hargreave
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Care of:. Mandy Smart, Listing Team
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Courts and Tribunal Services
7th Floor, Victory House, 34 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6EX
Tel: 020 3077 5829 | E-mail: mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
 oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
Re: John Hastings Carew-Reid as Trustee and Attorney for Valerie Ann
Jouai 2) Valerie Ann Jouai  Your Ref: REF/2011/0422





Please see email attaching a Copy of High Courtdecision  sent

 today to the HM Land Registrar

 made the 29th December, 2011

 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.



Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com

.

From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
      Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, davidrosen@inlnews.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=14dae934082130bd2c04b8eeb78f


Attention:

Katherine Brothers

Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

Attention:

Katherine Brothers

Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com



*Subject:*



Marie_claire bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her license to
pratice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator 16th feb2012

*From:*

"davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com"
<david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>
>

(Add as Preferred Sender<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>
)



*Date:*

Thu, Feb 16, 2012 5:01 pm

*To:*

<MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>,
<alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>,
<mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>,
<oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>,
<jbk@bnilaw.com <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>, <
news@inlnews.com <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>, <
admin@awn.bz <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>, <
news@notw.bz <http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>>, <
robertjamisonandassociates@gmail.com<http://email14.secureserver.net/webmail.php?login=1>
>

Dear Marie,

 Just have spoken to the INLNews jourmalist that attended the hearing today before adjudicator Owen Rhys and it seems that the editorial people are keen to put a article about your illegal,wrongful, & or immoral activities in the courts and adjudicator hearings.

You seem to keen to become famous for the wrong reasons, to become known on the world stage as a high priced attorney that makes her living from telling lies to the courts & withhold material information from the courts for your clients. Just as you have done today for clients P & J Urquhart by lying in your submissions that there was no order to amend probate of the estate of Henry  Herbert Butler, when you & your clients are well aware that there is a High Court Order made 29th December  in 1MA30545 by District Judge Iyer," that a new grant of probate be granted to administer the Estate of the Late Henry Herbert Butler appointing the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Late Henry Herbert Butler."

 You then withheld presenting a copy of HC11C04156 being a Current High Court Action issued in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division being Valerie Ann Butler Claimant v P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for declarations that the purported land contracts, agreements and overage deeds were of no valid to legal effect and were null and void. You have read the judgment and directions of Master Teverson striking out the original claim HC11C00473 issued by John Carew-Reid as trustee and power of attorney for Valerie Ann Joaui against Gary Roger Joaui and others to try and obtain a judicial determination as to the Valerie Ann Joaui’s rights to Haywicks Farm, which was struck out only for the reason the master Teverson
believed that Mr Carew-Reid did not have the legal right to issue such
action in his own name as Trustee and power of Attorney for Valerie Ann
Joaui, and in fact gave directions in his judgment to Valerie Ann
Joaui/Butler that she should commence a new High Court Claim in her name against P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for
declarations that for declarations that the purported land contracts,
agreements and overage deeds were of no valid to legal effect and were null and void., and a separate claim against the said Gary Roger Joaui to obtain a court order that the original grant of probate granted to the said Gary Roger Jouai had no legal effect and was null and void and a new grant of probate be granted to administer the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointing Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler. and for a further order that “HM Registry of Land Titles  amend the HM Land Registry records for the property known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said gary Roger Jouai and replacing with Valerie Ann Butler as the registered owner of the property known as Haywicks Farm title number GR327583”

(The overage deeds were a term of these contracts and agreements which have the legal effect that these were not normal sales between seller and buyer for all of the rights of the property of Haywicks Farm to be transferred to the buyer, however was in effect a development partnership agreement between the said Gary Roger Jouai and P E Urquhart and J A Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi whereby the buyers paid over a very small portion of the potential worth of the Haywicks Farm and that for the next 20 years when the property known as Haywicks Farm is approved for development then the profit and valuation difference between the valuation of the property based
on the development approval and the amounts to be paid over to the said Gary Roger Jouai being 660,000 pounds from Mr and Mrs Urquhart and 12,000 pounds from  Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, would be shared on a 50.50 basis between the said Gary Roger Jouai an Mr and Mrs Urquhart and 12,000 pounds from  Mr and Mrs Nicolosi).

So as a result of Master Teverson’s directions in his judgment striking out HC11C00473 Valerie Ann Butler using her maiden-birth name, in respect to her late father Herbert Henry Butler to keep the Butler Family name on the title deed on Haywicks Farm, as her Husband hade died, issued two new High# Court Claims HC11C04156 (still waiting or a trial to be set down for hearing) and 1MA30545 which has been finalized as per court order made the 29th December, 2011 by District Judge Iyer sitting at Manchester District Registry. As attached to this letter which you and you clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi had a copy of on the 14th February, 2011 as posted by guaranteed delivery to your clients on the 13th February, 2012 the day the court extracted the order for the first time, even though it was made the 29th December, 2011, the court having appologised for the delay in extracting the order.

You are well aware that the appeal in HC11C00473 against Master Teverson’s directions in his judgment striking out HC11C00473 has not legally been fully determined with John Carew-Reid as Trustee and Power of Attorney for Valerie Ann Joaui still awaiting for a hearing of the oral leave to appeal hearing application. The judges listing have stated that it is likely that this leave to appeal application will not be listed til sometime in the middle of March, 2012.Then if leave to appeal is refused then we are informed Mr John Carew-Reid will appeal against that decision to the Court of Appeal, and that is likely to take another six months at least to be dealt with, and the Adjudicator to the HM Land registry can not make any orders and/or directions to the HM Land Registry until that appeal processes involving HC11C00473are all fully dealt with and fully determined.

Some of the Factual and Legal issues and problems with summary of facts and summary of law presented by Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale to the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry on the 16th February, 2012 in the hearing of Peler Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart applicant and Valerie Ann Jouai and John Carew-Reid Respondents over the property known as Haywicks Farm Title Number GR327583 also known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 9QE.

1.       Section 204- law of property Act 1925- Orders of the Court
Conclusive. So the court order made of the 29th December, 2011 by District Judge Iyer sitting at Manchester District Registry, Civil Justice Centre, 1 Bridge Street, West, Manchester, M60 9DI is completely conclusive and takescomplete priority over everything- Thus HM land registry must act on this court order above all other directions from the Adjudicator to the HM Land Registry- Adjudicator has no power to overrule Court order from District Judge Iyer- If Adjudicator is acting in  a correct, proper and non corrupt way in carrying out his duties as an adjudicator then the adjudicator has no choice but to instruct the HM land Registry to act on this court order –
Until this order is set aside nothing else can be done by the Applicants-Mr and Mrs Urquharts to oppose the registration of the title deed of
Haywicks Farm being registered in the name of Valerie Ann Butler- The HM Land Registry must immediately act and register the property known as Haywicks Farm Title Number GR327583 also known as Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 9QE. Into the name of Valerie Ann Butler.

2.       Land registration Rules 2003/1417-Misellaneous and Special cases death of a proprietor- 162- Transfer by a personal representative (i) an application to register by a personal representative who is not already registered as proprietor, must be accompanied by a court order appointed the transferor as the deceased personal representative. Thus the court order made by Iyer J in the High Court of Justice, Manchester Registrysatisfies this land registration rule because in paragraph 2 of the court
order it states: “2.  An order that a new grant of probate be granted to
administer the estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointing the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate if the Late Herbert Henry Butler (ii) The registrar is under no duty to investigate the reasons for transfer of property by a personal representative of a deceased and must assume that the personal representative is acting correctly and within his or her powers which have been given to Valerie Ann Butler in the court order made the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545.

3.       Land Registration Rules 2003: 16.If an application is not in order
the registrar may raise such requisitions as the registrar considers
necessary specifying a period (being not les that 20 days) within which the applicant must comply with the requisition. It is noted that attorney Marie –Clair Beasdale has deliberately misrepresented the true facts in her submissions to the adjudicator. Also the HM Land registrar seems to have breached its duties by only giving 7 days to rectify the requisition given on the first set of UN1 and RX1 notices lodged the 13th January, 2011, when the Land Registration Rules 2003 Rule 16:Applictions Not In order: States:
“if an application is not in order the registrar may raise such
requisitions as he considers necessary, specifying a period (being not less than twenty business days) within which the applicant must comply with requisitions

4.       Marie-Clair Bleasdale did not mention to the adjudicator that  that
there were serious allegations in the statements of truth filed in the High Court and with the Adjudicator that someone in the HM Land Registry acted in a wrongful, illegal and/or corrupt way in that something wrongful was done with the original UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 13th Januray, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm by Valerie Jouai to protect her
rightful interests in Haywicks Farm, in that on the HM Land Registry
Records it shows they were sent out for requisitions to be complied with to solicitors for Valerie Ann Jouai being Simon Muirhead Burtons at their
London address, however such UNI and RX1 Notices never arrived at Simon Muirhead Burtons’ s offices and in fact seem to completely disappeared somewhere between the HM Land Registry and/or they never were sent and just placed in a draw somewhere out of the way and/or were thrown in the bin.
Either way they have never been found. It is understood that the INL News Investigation team have a witness form the HM Land registry woul will appear at any trial of this action that will verify what happened to these UN1 an RX1 notices and that they were lost as a favour for the powerful legal firms in Gloucester being Langley wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson, who fairly well control most of the land registration business in Gloucester and their power base also helped by the fact that one of the main attorneys and partners of Langley Welling is a Deputy Judge and and an assistant coroner in Gloucester and has a lot of power and influence in Gloucester to get anything done he wants done, even if it is wrongful and/or illegal, and thus to get a clerk in the HM Land registry to lose a UN1 and a RX1 Notice and ask for a seven day requisition instead of the statutory 20 business in day requisition request was probably not a very difficult thing to do in consideration they were dealing with Valerie Ann Jouai and her representatives being in Australia handling the matter, and by the time they found out what has happened the title deed of Haywicks Farm would  have been registered in the names of Mr and Mrs Urquhart and all a bit legally difficult to correct. After all the expected development profit from a luxury development of Haywicks Farm into a luxury residential subdivision was expected to be in excess of 20 million pounds and so there was a lot of money at stake for  the said Gray Roger Jouai ( his real name being Gary Roger Butler not Gary Roger Jouai) and his silent partners being the various legal firms involved and their development company Edgon Estate Limited  and the other development partners Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi. Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson knew they had to get the first UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged with MH Land Registry disappeared and/or lost otherwise they could not have been able to the title of Haywicks Farm transferred to Mr and Mrs Urquhart by a transferred lodge on the 27th January, 2011, unless there first UN1 and RX notices had lapsed by getting them to disappear and so the 7 day requisition notice could not be complied with and would not even no known about. The reason why Madge Lloyd Gibson waited till the 27th January, 2011 to lodge the transfers of Haywicks Farm, because that was after they assumed the original UN1 and RX1 notices would have been fully lapsed because they had been lost. However their plan failed because the due dilligence  of Deputy Land Registrar Katherine Brothers who was watching a serious fraud alert on the title deed lodged by Reid and Associates and told Reid and associates  on the 14thJanuary, 2011 that the first UN1 and Rx1 Notices had been requisitioned and sent to attorneys Simon Muirhead Burton’s address in London, however it was
quickly ascertained by Reid and Associates that such UNI and RX1 notices never arrived, and thus there was no doubt that they were never sent, sent to the wrong address, and/or put in the bin and a false record of HM land Registry files stating they had been sent to Simon Muirhead Burton. So action was quickly taken by Valerie Ann Jouai to instructing Reid and Associates to urgently courier over two new replacement UN1 and RX1 notices to replace the ones first lodged on the 13th January, 2011 ( as a continuance of the application notice lodged against Haywicks Farm by Solicitors Simon Miurhead Burton on the 6th January, 20111 for and/or on behalf of Valerie Ann Jouai) and these arrived for lodgment at the HM Land Registry on the 19th January, 2011 and were formally lodged on the 19thJanuary, 2011 by HM Land Registry over the title deed of Haywicks Farm. as replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices, to replaced the UN1 and RX1 Notices that lodged on the 13th January, 2011 that went missing.

5.       Some points of the true outline and time line of facts And Law
that Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not present to the adjudicator in
her written and verbal submissions on the 16th February, 2012: (i) Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that everyone that was concerned in the buying, selling and transferring, conveyancing, etc of the property known as Haywicks Farm including legal firms an attorneys Langley Wellington –Mage Lloyd Gibson – Simon James Fisher – Luttons Dunford, the Stroud Council, Estate Agents Fox-Grant and Vince Pullen, the purported seller of the property the said Gary Roger Jouai and the proposed buyers of Haywicks Farm being Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were all notified and well well aware of the serious allegations form, at least the beginning of December, 2010, (and earlier) that were being alleged against the said Gary Roger Jouai, Attorney Simon James Fisher, Eggletons Solicitors, legal secretary using the name Vivienne Hobbs ( which is a false surname and a false Christian name, the correct Christian name is Vivian, not Vivienne as was used on the fraudulent purported will of the late Herbert Henry Butler purportedly dated January, 1984 and the surname name is not legally Hobbs) and others being involved with a criminal
conspiracy to defraud and possibly murder the Late Herbert Henry Butler and the defrauding of the late Herbert Henry Butler’s only child Valerie Ann-Butler of her rights ownership of Haywicks Farm by the use of a fraudulent will and/or not legally witnessed will to obtain a wrongful and /or fraudulent grant of probate for the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler wrongly naming Gary Roger Jouai as the personal representative of the Estate of the late Herbert Henry Butler with the long term purpose of the said Gary Roger Jouai fraudulently obtaining the title deed of Haywicks Farm into the name of Gray Roger Joaui. This the two purported buyers of Haywicks Farm, being Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and their two legal firms Langley Wellington and Madge Lloyd Gibson were all well aware of these serious allegations surrounding claiming a criminal conspiracy against the said Gary Roger Jouai and others as to how the title deed of Haywicks Farm was registered in the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai from at least the beginning of December, 2010 and thus the to proposed buyers and their solicitors can not claim their clients are innocent third parties in the proposed purchase of Haywicks Farm. It s also noted that although they were all well aware of such serious allegations of  criminal nature as to how the said Gary Roger Jouai obtained the title deed of cHaywicks Farm to be registered into the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai, the two buyers of the Haywicks Farm were happy to proceed with the
partnership agreement with the said Gary Roger Jouai to development
Haywicks Farm through  the contracts/agreements/ Overage Agreement and hand over 660,000 and 12,000 pounds to their solicitors Madge Lloyds Gibson as part of the conditions of the development partnership agreement. The answer as to why they were prepared to do this lies in the fact that the to sets of legal firms involved both gave advice that even if such criminal conspiracy was proven to be true, because of the law of Statute of
Limitations, the said Gary Roger Joaui and his partners  including Mr and
Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi would be able to get away with
defrauding Valerie Ann Butler of her rightful ownership in Haywicks Farm.
However even though master Teverson through that legal argument out at the
first hearing of the strike out application in HC11C00743 as not legally
valid, neither Mr and Mrs Urquhart nor Mr and Mrs Nicolosi have asked their solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson for their money back from the day they alleged they paid the 660,000 and 12,000 pounds to Madge Lloyds Gibson on the 17th December, 2010, and have been more than happy to rely on their various legal teams, now amounting to at least five sets of attorneys involved in advising them, on and off the court record, to bulldoze their way through the courts with false, and misleading factual and legal submissions and withholding material facts, with none of the sets of legal teams now being game to be officially on court record anymore for Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, because they are all too scared to be seen officially being responsible for the presenting of false and misleading information to the court  and want to advice them from behind the scenes.  It is also noted that is is highly unusual that a top attorney like Marie Clair Bleasdale would  risk her whole legal career to come to the adjudicator’s hearing presenting so many false and misleading facts and withholding so much material facts and information. It is also highly unusual that a top Attorney like Marie Clair Bleasdale would take direct instructions form a litigant, rather than take than the litigant giving the instructions to a legal form and then the legal firm instructing Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale. This situation never happens in the legal process.
Attorneys do not take instructions directly form a litigant, they always
take the instructions from a legal firm who then instructs the attorney.
However, it seems that as Marie-Clair Bleasdale was being blamed by her other clients, legal firm Bude Nathan Iwanier, who were instructed by Finelend Investments Limited,  for being sue for one billion pounds in
damages by the INL News Group and others with such damages being caused as a result of advice proved by attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale, she became desperate and determined to destroy the chance of Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai obtain her Haywicks Farm back because Valerie Ann Bulter.Jouai was being supported by the INL News Legal  and Investigative Team that were also suporting Janice Pritchard against Bude Nathan Iwanier and their client Fineland Investments Limited  with the INL News Group and other suing Bude Nathan Iwanier and Fineland Investments for one billion pounds in damages.

6.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that there was no
doubt in the evidence filed with the High Court and the Adjudicator that Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, the said Gary Roger Jouai and their legal firms and attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington  and their estate agents Vince-Pullen and Grant-Fox etc  all well know about the  serious allegations as to a criminal conspiracy to defraud the late Herbert Henry Butler and his only child Valerie Ann Butler of their rights to ownership of Haywicks Farm from at least the beginning of December, 2010 (nd a lot earlier) before contacts were signed between Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, the said Gary Roger Jouai and their legal firms and attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington  and their estate agents Vince-Pullen and Grant-Fox etc   for the proposed sale and purchase of Haywicks Farm and thus Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, can not be considered as innocent third parties to the transactions.

7.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that the proposed
sale and transfer of Haywicks Farm from the said Gary Roger Joaui to Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, was in any respect a normal sale and/or transaction where all present and future rights in Haywicks Farm are transferred to the buyers because the terms of the contacts include a condition that the purchases enter into an overage deed where by 50% of any future increase in value in the next 20 years of Haywicks Farm as a result of any development approval will have to be shared with the said Gary Roger Jouai and the two proposed purchasers Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi on a 50/50 basis, so this is a partnership agreement to develop  Haywicks Farm over the next twenty years and not a normal sale transaction.

8.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that did not
mention that the expected new value of Haywicks Farm on 26 acres as prime potential luxury residential development land over the next 20 years would be around 20 million pounds,which is around 30 times the combined price of 672,000 pounds the Hackwicks Farm was being transferred to purchasers Mr and Mrs Urquhart and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi for.

9.       Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that that was an
application notice lodged  on the 6th January, 2011 over Haywicks Farm to stop any dealings of the Haywicks Fran title by London legal firm Simon Muirhead and Burton for their Client Valerie Anne Jouai.Butler. and that application notice was renewed three times by London legal firm Simon Muirhead and Burton for their Client Valerie Anne Jouai.Butler  and each time the application notice was renews it was extent for a six day period thus the Application Notice ran for 18 days.from the 6th January, 2011 to the 27thth January, 2011 and was continued on the 13th and 19th January, 2011 by UN1 and RX1 Notices.The the UN1 and Rx1 notices lodge3 13th and 19th January, 2011 took over as a continuance of the Application notice.

10.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that the first set of
UN1 and RX1 Notices that were lodged on the 13th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm did not lapse because they did not comply with the statutory minimum 20 business days required for a requisition notice.
They were accidently and/or deliberately lost, mislaid and/or sent to the wrong address so they were never received by the London legal Firm Simon Muirhead Burton at their londo9n office the address for service for Valerie Ann Jouai.Butler for these UN1 and RX1 Notices.

11.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that there were a
second set of UN1 and RX1 notices lodged on the 19th January, 2001 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to replace the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 13th January, 2011 that were lost. Mislaid and/or sent to the wrong address ( deliberately and/or accidently by a clerk in HM Land Registry Office), which were accepted by HM Land Registry as replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices for the 13th January, 2011 ones and as a continuance of the Application Notice lodged over Haywicks Farm on the 6th January, 2011 that continued by three renewals till the 26th January, 2011.

12.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale did not mention that in any event the replacement UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged over the title of Haywicks Farm by Valerie Jouai/Butler on the 19th January, 2011 are still and were still current at the date of the Adjudication hearing on the 16th February, 2011, so even if it was considered that the original set of Un1 and RX1 notices lodged on the 13th January, 2011 had lapsed ( which is argued strongly that they did not lapse) then the second set of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged on the 19th January, 2011 are still valid and lodged over the title deed of Haywicks Farm and are a continuance of the Application Notice lodged on the6th January, 2011.. thus from the 9th January, 2011 onwards and continuing till the 16th February, 2012 and after the 16th February, 2012 there has been a continuing Application and/or UN1 and/or RX1 Notice lodged against the title deed of Haywicks Farm to protect the rights of Valerie Ann Jouai/Butler in the title deed  of Haywicks Farm.

13.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale tried to present a false picture  of
facts to the Adjudicator that the objection to the application to have a
transfer in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart registered on the title deed of Haywicks Farm lodged the 27th January, 2011 was solely based on an email dated 15th February, 2011 from Reid and Associated to the HM Land Registry objecting to the application to have a transfer in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart registered on the title deed of Haywicks Farm lodged the 27th January, 2011 and Part 8 Claim HC11C00473 which was issued on the 2-3-2011 by John Carew-Reid as Trustee and Power of Attorney for Valerie Ann Jouai against various defendants which included Mr and Mrs Urquhart, Mr and Mrs Nicolosi and their solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson, the said Gary Roger Jouai and his solicitors Langley Wellington and others. This presentation of the facts was completely false in that the objection was based on the Application Notice lodged the 6th January, 2011 and the continuance of such  Application Notice in the form of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13t and 19 th January, 2011 against the title deed of Haywicks Farm. Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were all well aware that the real legal and factual basis  of the objection was originally based on the application notice lodged the 6th January, 2-11 and the continuance of such Application Notice in the
form of UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm to protect the interests of Valerie Ann Jouai/Butler in Haywicks  Farm, and also now the court order made by Judge Iyer in the Manchester Registry in 1MA30545 the 29th December, 2011 ordering that the title deed of Haywicks Farm be transferred to Valerie Ann Butler ( the maiden and birth name of Valerie Ann Jouai). Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi, all know full well that the truth of the matter in that all legal actions issued such as the the first two earlier actions in the Cardiff an Queensland Australia Courts in January, 2011, and the later actions HC11C00473 and HC11C04156 to have the legal rights of Valerie Ann Joaui/Butler in Haywicks Farm determined by the courts, which were just in support of such Application
 Notice lodged 6th January, 2011 and the continuance of that Application
Notice being UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 and not the main basis of the objections. This was a very tricky and clever type fraud on the court by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale and was a legal and clever way of presenting  a  false impression to the Adjudicator but a very dishonest thing to do by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale.

14.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not told the truth to
the Adjudicator in her written submissions in paragraph when she falsely states: “ Gary Jouai’s title to the property derives out of a grant of probate of the will of Herbert Henry Butler. Gary Jouai being the sole
executor and residuary beneficiary of that will. Herbert Henry Butler died on 18th February, 1990 and Gary Jouai was granted probate on 21st August, 1990. That Grant of Probate has not been revoked.”  Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale’s clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were sent in the mail on the 13th February, 2011 and also Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale  and her clients Mr and Mrs Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi were at the Adjudicators hearing on the 16th February, 2012 given another copy of the court order made by from District Judge Iyer sitting in the Machester District Registry on the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 which that:
(i) “An order that the Grant of Probate dated 21st August,
1990 granted in the High Court of Justice Probate Court of Wales for the
Administration of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler that
appointed the said,’ Gary Roger Jouai’  as the appointed representative of the Late Herbert Henry Butler be declared null and void and of no legal effect.
(ii) “ An order that a new Grant of Probate be granted to
Administer the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler appointed the said Valerie Ann Butler as the personal representative of the Estate of the Late Herbert Henry Butler..”

15.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not told the truth to
the Adjudicator by not openly declaring to the Adjudicator that she has
been the main legal counsel directly advising her clients Mr and Mrs
Urquhart, and Mr and Mrs Nicolosi in how to lodge a defense in HC11C0456 and also has been advising her clients in great detail as to what to place in their defense and submissions and how to word their defense in HC11C456 and thus knows the full details of HC11C0456. Thus Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale well knows that until the full determination of HC11C0456 and/or until Valerie wants to by her own agreement, the Adjudicator can not legally bypass the determination of HC11C0456, or the pending leave to appeal in HC11C00473 which is still to be heard at an oral hearing, and can not order the removal of the UN1 and RX1 Notices lodged the 13th and 19th January, 2011 over the title deed of Haywicks Farm and can not order the HM Land Registry to register the transfers from the said Gary Roger Jouai to PL Urquhart an J A Urquhart of the property known as Haywicks Farm.

16.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale has deliberately not instructed the
adjudicator on the law that the order made by District Judge Iyer on the 29th December, 2011 in 1MA30545 “ordering that the HM Land Registry amend the title deed of Haywicks Farm to show Valerie Ann Butler as the registered owner of such property”… is conclusive and can not be interfered with by the Adjudicator and that the HM Land Registry are forced in law to immediately act on such court order to immediately register the title deed of Haywicks Farm in the name of Valerie Ann Butler

17.   It is also noted that Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqeline Ann
Urquhart have deliberately lied to the High Court of Justice and the
Adjudicator when they have stated: (i) They both had no idea and/or
knowledge of any sort prior to the 2nd March, 2011 of the serious
allegations of the said Gary Roger Jouai, legal Firm Eccletons and their
family development company Egton Estates Limited, Legal From Madge Lloyd Gibson, Legal Firs Luttons Dunford, Attorney Simon James Fisher, Legal Firm Langley Wellington an others being involved in a criminal conspiracy started in 1884 to 2010 and continuing to help the title deed of Haywicks Farm to be wrongly and/or fraudulently registered in the name of the said Gary Roger Jouai., in circumstances that there are a number of statements on the High Court of Justice files and the Adjudicator files proving conclusively that these statements are untrue and that the facts that Mr and Mrs Urquhart and their attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson, well knew about such serious allegations of a criminal conspiracy involving Haywicks Farm against the said Gary Roger Jouai from at least the beginning of December, 2010 and as far as their legal firm Madge Lloyd Gibson advising them on the settlement and transfer of Haywicks Farm, they have known about such serious allegations since 1990.

18.   It is also noted that Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jacqeline Ann
Urquhart have deliberately lied to the Adjudicator when they have stated:  That they do not have formal legal representation and/or help in dealing with the Adjudicator regarding their claimed right to have HM Land Registry process their application dated the 27th January, 2011 to register the transfer the remainder of the property known as Haywicks Farm from the said Gary Roger Jouai to PE and J A Urquhart. They have stated in a statement and submissions to the Ajudicator that the only legal assistance they have# has is a little assistance form a friend who is a solicitor, and have given the Adjudicator that they were mainly dealing with the matter themselves without formal legal assistance. The without any warning to Valerie Ann Butler/Joaui, Mr and Mrs Urquhart appear with Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale , who is one of the top attorneys in London that specialises in land argument matters, to appear for them against an old very sick old lady in her 70’s (Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai) before the Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012, with well researched and detailed legal and factual submissions that obviously took a number of weeks to research and put together because of the great detail in them and were not a last minute rushed set of submissions. Valerie An Butler/Jouai  is a very frail sick
old lady in her 70’s that known noting about the a law and how the argue
her rights who has travelled all the way from Australia for the hearing,
even though she is English by birth and spent the first half of her life in
England.

19.   Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale came armed with a well researched and detailed set of factual and legal submissions at the hearing before the Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012 which had never been seen before by Valerie Ann Butler Jouai, who though she was going to attend a friendly sort of adjudication hearing where she and the Urquharts were going to speak for themselves in lay mans terms and try and sort things out on a friendly basis. Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai was not even given an adjournment to be able to be try and read and understand such detailed factual and legal submissions prepared by one of the top Attorneys in  that specialises in land an property arguments . Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai this had no chance to respond to the detailed legal and factual submissions, let alone even had a chance to read them. The fact that such legally and factually detailed and complex submissions were presented against Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai an only first given to her at the hearing and not the normal at least 24 hours before, which is a standard minimum, and when there is a top Attorney against a frail old sick lady who knows nothing about the law, the such detailed factual and legal submission should have been provided at least seven days before the hearing date to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai. Civil law is not meant be won by ambushing the opponent. The whole concept of civil law is for each side to present their factual and legal submissions
and arguments to the other side to give the other side a chance to respond to these factual and legal arguments, to find out where they agree or disagree on the facts and were they agree or disagree on the law. Then when there is a disagreement of the facts and the law then it is then up to the adjudicator, magistrate, judge etc to hear the evidence on the facts from all parties and decide what the true facts are and then adjudicate on the law based on these settled facts. That is why all sides are obligated under the rules in civil hearings of any kind to provide the facts and law they are going to rely on at the hearing to their opponent at the earliest pportunity as possible as soon as they are prepared. If detailed,
statements, and factual and legal submissions are given at the hearing
without notice to the other side the adjudicator, magistrate, judge etc
hearing the matter is duty bound to adjourn the hearing to another date to
give  the opponent to chance to read, understand and respond to these last submissions. The adjudicator failed in his duty in not giving and
adjournment to Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai to respond to these last minute
detailed legal and factual submissions presented to her for the first time
at the hearing on the 16th February, 2012 by Attorney Marie Clair
Bleasdale. Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale should have3 appologised to the Adjudicator and Valerie Ann Butelr/Jouai for the late service of her
submissions and actual herself insisted that there be an adjournment to the adjudication hearing to give Valerie Ann Butelr/Jouai a chance to obtain some legal avice on Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale’s very detailed factual and legal submissions.

20.   It is noted that had there been an adjournment to the proceedings
before the Adjudicator on the 16th February, 2012 to another date, then
Valerie Ann Butler/Jouai would have had the opportunity to ask the free
help of the INL News Legal Team, as she has done now, to read and analyse the detailed factual and legal submission presented  by Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale an have the INL news Legal and Investigation Team respond to them for her. Thus by the time of the next hearing date all the falsities, misleading statements and withholding of material facts and misleading submissions , misleading time line would have been exposed in written submissions in opposition as they have now been exposed is these submissions.

21.   It is also note that it was false for Attorney Marie Clair Bleasdale
to state in her verbal and written submissions that the leave to appeal
application in Hc11C00473 has been finally determined when in actual fact John Carew-Reid is expecting a hearing date to be set in about the middle of March,2012 for an oral hearing to argue leave to appeal the decision of Master Teverson to strike out claim HC11C00473.

David Rosen, Attorney at Law,  INL News Legal and Investigative Team

----------
Sent from my Nokia Phone

------Original message------
From: Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>
To: "davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com" <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Cc: "alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk" <alr@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk>,"
mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk" <mandy.smart@hmcts.qsi.gov.uk>,"
oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk" <oluwatovin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,"
jbk@bnilaw.com" <jbk@bnilaw.com>,"Radcliffe Clerks Email" <
clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
Date: Thursday, February 16, 2012 7:33:12 PM GMT+0000
Subject: Re: Marie_claire bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her
license to pratice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator
16th feb2012

Dear Mr Rosen

Please supply me with your full name and address.

If you continue to send these threatening emails I will involve the police.

Kind regards
Marie-Claire Bleasdale

On 16 Feb 2012, at 19:08, "davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com" <
david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> ----------
> Sent from my Nokia Phone
>
> ------Original message------
> From: davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
> To: "MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com
>
> Date: Thursday, February 16, 2012 6:59:02 PM GMT+0000
> Subject: Marie_Claire Bleasdaile is likely to got to jail & lose her
license to practice law for presenting false facts to owen rhys adjudicator
16th feb2012
>
> Dear Marie-ClairBleasdale

, the INL News Group have given so many warnings to stop presenting false
information to the courts & adjudicators on behalf of your clients to
obtain fraudulent & or wrongful court orders for your clients. The INL News
journalist /actor Today reported that you have lied again. You have to
write to the adjudicator & request his orders to be cancelled because you
deliberately lied in your written submissions presented to Adjudicator  Owen
Rhys & withheld material information. P2 of submissions false & you did not
mention hc11c04156 which P & U Urquhart have stated you advised them on as
they have requested your costs to be paid to the court. You have been given
the court cases showing you will end up in jail & lose your license to
practice law for the criminal contempt you committed today. The INL News
Group have gone easy on you up to now because you are female & not a
freemason. However the INL News group's patience is running. The editors of
various INL News websites as well > Yours sincerely David Rosen
>
> ----------
> Sent from my Nokia Phone
>
>

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011 Your Ref:
REF/2011/0422
From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, February 17, 2012 2:07 am
To: John stolarczyk <john.stolarczyk@bigpond.com>
Cc: Martin Chapman <martinchapman542@hotmail.com>


 ---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *David Rosen* <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 12:10 AM
Subject: HaywicksFarm_HighCourtOrder_dated-29thDec-2011 Your Ref:
REF/2011/0422
To: Adjudicator to HM Land Registry <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>



Copy of High Court sent today to the HM Land Registrar



Attention:

Owen Rhys, Mark Southby
Saru Hargreave
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
Care of:
Mandy Smart
Listing Team
Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, HM Courts and Tribunal Services
7th Floor, Victory House, 34 Kingsway, London, WC2B 6EX
Tel: 020 3077 5829 | E-mail: mandy.smart@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>,
 oluwatoyin.ijiwoye@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk,
Re: John Hastings Carew-Reid as Trustee and Attorney for Valerie Ann
Jouai 2) Valerie Ann Jouai  Your Ref: REF/2011/0422





Please see email attaching a Copy of High Court sent today to the HM Land
Registrar

 made the 29th December, 2011

 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said
 "Gary Roger Jouai" and replacing it withm"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com

.

From: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>
To: "gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk" <
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
      Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc: David Rosen <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, davidrosen@inlnews.com
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=14dae934082130bd2c04b8eeb78f


Attention:

Katherine Brothers, Deputy Registrar, HM Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

Attention: Katherine Brothers, Reputy Registrar, HM Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order
 made the 29th December, 2011
 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for

the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester
GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583*

by deleting the name of the said

 "Gary Roger Jouai"

and replacing it with

"Valerie Ann Butler"
of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title
Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com



Deputy Registrar

Land Registry

Tel: 01452 511 790

gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk

"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>
"gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk"<
gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>;
Your Ref: GR327583/D/201/KB
Dear Ms Brothers

Please see attached High Court of Justice Order made the 29th December, 201 in High Court Claim Number 1MA30545
ordering that the RM registrar of Titles amend the HM Registry Records for the property known as "Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucester GL2 3QE" being Title Number GR327583 by deleting the name of the said  "Gary Roger Jouai" and replacing it with "Valerie Ann Butler" of Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Harwicke, Gloucester, GL2 6QE being Title Number GR327583.

It would be much appreciated if the Registrar of Titles attended to this
title amendment as soon as possible.

Please send any correspondence to our Google Mail Address.

Yours sincerely

David Rosen Attorney At Law
INL News Group
Email: "David Rosen" <david.rosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, and
davidrosen@inlnews.com
David Rosen
Feb 27
to Katharine, Adjuaicator, news, news, admin, tony.standen, oluwatoyin.iji., mandy.smart, Marie-Claire, William
 
Urgent attention:
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, 
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, David
Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>, 
"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William
Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>


Fraud by Katharine Brothers, HM Land Registry, Radcliffe Chambers,Marie Claire Bleasdale and ors Ref: GR351346/A/223/KB]

We are following this up with an international news report


We will send you a a draft of the article tomorrow before it is published
for your comments before it is published


INL News Legal and Investgative Team


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Fwd: Our Ref: GR351346/A/223/KB
From: Valerie Butler <valerieannbutler@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, May 16, 2012 5:58 am
To: Katharine Brothers <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
"gloucester.office" <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>, David
Rosen <davidrosen.inlnews@gmail.com>, David Rosen <news@inlnews.com>,
"Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, "William
Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>,
"Adjudicator to HM Land Registry" <ALR@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>

16th May, 2012
To:
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

 and To:
Sarah Canipel, Objections Clerk, Direct line 0300 006 1763
Land Registry
Gloucester Office
Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111
Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Re:Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart and Valerie Ann Butler
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke

Dear Ms Brother and Ms Canipel

I am shocked and dismayed about your quite obvious corrupt and wrongful behaviour and the fact that you both and HM Land registry have now joined the list of conspirators conspiring to defraud m of my rights to Haywicks Farm be ignoring a High Court order to have the property registered in my name and by passing the full outcome other current actions that before courts to further adjudicate on the wrongs and/or rights of Mr and Mrs Urquhart claim to be allowed to have their transfer from the said Gary Roger Jouai of Haywicks Farm processed by HM Land registry.
You ignoring a High Court order dated 29th December, 2012 to have Haywicks Farm transferred into my name which is dated some two and a half months prior tot he orders made by Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land registry, and thus has to take priority to the Adjudicators order. Untill the order made on the 29th December, 2011 is set aside then it is law and can not be ignored or by passed.
You also are not carrying on with you promise and undertaking in your letter dated the 21st February, 2012 which states

 "...should give effect to the order unless we know it has been stayed,
or that one of the parties has applied for a stay..."

You and HM Land registry are well aware that a stay has been applied for in HC12C00678.a dn we are awaiting for the court to set done a hearing date to argue this stay application and HM Land Registry can not act to process the transfer from the said Gary Roger Jouai to Mrs and Mrs Urquhart until that stay application has been heard and fully determined.
There is also a further application to set aside the orders of Justice Mann in HC11C00473 to be heard on the 24th July, 2012 in the High Court
There is also a live action n HC11C04156 that has yet to be determined
and you are saying that you going to corruptly and/or wrongly use your power and authority for a wrongful purpose to by pass all of the court actions and High court order to help the other conspirators defraud me of my rights to Haywicks Farm, all because you have been offered a good promotion and or a better pay salary and want to help cover up corruption in the Gloucester Land Registry Office.

If you carry out your threats to register the title deed of Haywicks Farm in the name of Mr and Mrs Urquhart in these circumstances toy will be guilty of conspiracy to defraud of my rights to Haywicks Farm and will be sued for million of pounds personally  along with HM Land Registry for conspiracy to defraud and malefiance of public officers and I will be doing all i can to work with the INL News Group to have you lose you job, have you arrested and the Gloucester office of the Land Registry fully investigated for serious corruption.
 I am old and sick but before I die O will make sure all this is carried out to others will not do this sort of behaviour and think they can get away with it. I understand that the INL News Group are very keen and also ready to public world wide articles to expose you and your corrupt activities. I have told them to hold off util I see if you are going to start to act in a proper and correct manner and wait to all the court actions are completed and full adjudicated before considering to  carry out your threats to. process the transfer from the said Gary Roger Jouai to Mrs and Mrs Urquhart
I will also be suing barrister Marie Clare Bleasdale for telling lies on court about this matter such as the lie that the action HC12c00678 for a stay did not have the fees paid for, that is a deliberate lie by you and her and neither of you have apologised for telling that deliberate and calculated lie. the fees were paid for in cash and there is not problem with them and this action is alive and well.


I will have the INL News Legal team send you a further letter late on today.

Yours 

Valerie Ann Butler

From:
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry, Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk


Dated 15th May, 2012 but received by email on the 16th

TO:Valerie Ann Butler
View Point
Banwell Road
Hutton
Avon
BS24 9TZ
15 May 2012

Your ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart And Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke


Dear Ms Butler,
I refer to your recent emails and in particular the latest one sent on
14 May 2011 at 15:11.
As indicated in the letter sent by my colleague on 21 February 2012
and in my letter dated 22 February 2012 Land Registry is required
to give effect to the order of the Adjudicator dated 16 February 2012
unless we know it has been stayed or one of the parties has applied
for a stay.
My letter dated 3 May 2012 reviewed the current position and set
out the reasons why the application for registration of the transfer
dated 13 December 2010 should now proceed. Having regard to the
proceedings issued in the High Court of Justice in Manchester
under claim number IMA30545 and the proceedings issued under
claim number HC11C00473 the position remains as set out in my
letter dated 3 May 2012.
You have confirmed in your email sent on 11 May 2012 at 12:14
that the proceedings under Claim number HC11C04156 are subject
to a striking out application which is to be heard on 5 July 2012.
Apart from this update, the position in respect of these proceedings
remains as set out in my letter dated 3 May 2012.
Also in your email sent on 11 May 2012 at 12:14 you refer to an
application for a stay of the Adjudicators order being made in
proceedings under Claim number HC12C00678. As you had joined
in HM Land Registry as a party to these proceedings the matter was
referred to Head Office who instructed Treasury Solicitor to
represent HM Land Registry. I have accordingly verified the current
position with Head Office who have confirmed that although the
claim form does appear to include an application for a stay it has not
been issued and therefore the application for registration of the
transfer should now proceed.
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790

Copy of letter dated 21st February, 2012 to Valerie Ann Butler
 from
Sarah Canipel, Objections Clerk, Direct line 0300 006 1763
Land Registry
Gloucester Office
Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3
Tel 0300 006 1111
Fax 0300 006 0050
gloucester.office @landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk

Date
21 February 2012
Our ref
GR351346/A/223/SC/GL CT04
Proprietor/Applicant Peter Urquhart and Jacqueline Urquhart
Title number GR351346
Property Haywicks Farm, Haywicks Lane,
Hardwicke
Dear Ms Butler
We are in receipt of your email dated 21 February to Katharine
Brothers.
Mrs Brothers has left for the day so I will leave this email for her
consideration tomorrow. As to date we have not yet received the
Order of the Adjudicator. Once received we should give effect to
the order unless we know it has been stayed, or that one of the
parties has applied for a stay.
If you would like to discuss this correspondence or require it in an
alternative format please contact me, quoting our reference.
Yours faithfully
Sarah Canipel
Objections Clerk
Direct line 0300 006 1763


On Wed, May 16, 2012 , <gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk> wrote:
The document attached is an official requisition, reminder or letter from Land Registry.  It is not a circular and relates either to an application you have lodged with us or a property in which you have an interest.  No paper copy of the item of correspondence will be sent to you.    
The document is in 'Portable Document Format'(PDF) which replicates the appearance of the hard copy version. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to open the document.  If you do not already have Adobe Acrobat Reader it can be installed free from www.adobe.com.  Please note that as the document is in PDF format you cannot add text to any document that you need to complete and return to Land Registry.  You will have to return any such completed document by post.
Land Registry's House Price Index is now live. www.landregistry.gov.uk


If you have received this e-mail and it was not intended for you, please let us know, and then delete it. Please treat our communications in confidence,
as you would expect us to treat yours. Land Registry checks all mail and attachments for known viruses, however, you are advised that you open any
attachments at your own risk.

The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Cable&Wireless Worldwide in partnership with MessageLabs. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) On leaving the GSi this email was certified virus free.
Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.


INL News Legal and Investigative Team
Email: news:inlnews.com
8th May, 2012
Attention:
Attorney Marie-Claire Bleasdale
Email: "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
Radcliffe Chambers
 "Radcliffe Clerks" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>
and to:
Peter Urquhart
 "Peter Urquhart" <urquhartpeter@rocketmail.com>
and to:
"Katharine Brothers"
"Katharine Brothers" <Katharine.Brothers@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk>,
Katharine Brothers
Assistant Land Registrar
Direct Line 0300 006 1790
Land Registry
Gloucester Office, Twyver House, Bruton Way, Gloucester GL1 1DQ
DX 7599 Gloucester 3, Tel 0300 006 1111, Fax 0300 006 0050
Email:gloucester.office@landregistry.gsi.gov.uk
www.landregistry.gov.uk
 
Ref: GR351346/A/223/KB/GL CT04

Owen Ryhys, Acting as adjudicator to HM Land Registry in Gloucester
 
Notice of proposed article before publishing


Attorney Marie-Claire Bleasdale, HM Land Registry Lawyer Katharine Brothers helps Well Known Freemason Peter Urquhart and other well powerful Freemason attorneys, judges, Masters and Clerks in London's High Court of Justice, to defraud Valerie Ann Butler of her legal rights to Haywicks Farm on about 23 acres, which is in the process of being developed into a multi million pound luxury development in Gloucestershire, which has been in the Butler family for over 100 years.


The Legal and Investigative Team for the INL News Group have been investigating a serious conspiracy to defraud that is in the process of being committed against an elderly very sick English Pensioner, Valerie Ann Butler involving. The main purpose of the fraud is to fraudulently and/or wrongfully steal Haywicks Farm from English Pensioner Valerie Ann Butler, which has been in the Butler family for over 100 years.


The main beneficiaries of the fraud being well known and powerfully connected Freemason, Peter Leslie Urquhart, and well known and powerful Freemason solicitors Simon James Fisher and his legal firm Lutton Dunford, Madge Lloyd Gibson and Langley Wellington the all powerful Freemason Eggleton Family who run a property development company known as Egdon Estates.


Haywicks Farm is on around 23 acres and is prime residential development land on on the edge of the main canal is Gloucester and is ripe for a multi million pound luxury property development to be approved Stroud Council which is controlled by senior Freemasons who are well known to be happy to take bribes to have a property development approved.


The main conspirators being well known and powerfully connected Freemason, Peter Leslie Urquhart, and well known and powerful Freemason solicitors Madge Lloyd Gibson, Rickerby's solicitors and Langley Wellington the all powerful Freemason Eggleton Family who run a property development company known as Egdon Estates, have had to call in favours from corrupt Freemason Owen Rhys acting as adjudicator to HM Land Registry in Gloucester, corrupt Freemason High Court Master Teverson and corrupt Freemason High Court Judges-Justice Mann and Justice David Richards as well as a corrupt Assistant lawyers to HM Land Registrar named Katharine Brothers to help them complete the conspiracy to defraud and cover the conspiracy to defraud up.


There are multi millions of pounds involved because of the development potential of Haywicks Farm situated in Haywicks Lane, Hardwicke, Gloucestershire.



The conspiracy to defraud English Elderly Pensioner Valerie Ann Butler of her ownership rights to Haywicks Farm started as far back as 1984 when a fraudulent and false will for the Late Herbert Henry Butler, which was never s signed by the Late Herbert Henry Butler and was never formally and/or legally witnessed by the purported witnesses being Simon James Fisher and a person who never legally existed as a real person, a Vivienne Hobbs, was prepared with the help of Freemason attorney Simon James Fisher using false name of the other alleged witness, who worked for the very powerful Freemason Eggleton legal firm, with their power base in Gloucestershire being greatly strengthened by the fact the Mr Eggleton was the Gloucestershire Sherriff and could make anything happen in Gloucestershire.


The INL News Legal and Investigative Team have also uncovered evidence that leads to a strong suggestion and belief that the conspirators and/or their associates were also involved in the murder of the Late Herbert Henry Butler in February, 1990, so that they could then use one of the other conspirators Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson to present this fraudulent and false will to the probate Office in Gloucestershire to obtain a grant of probate in favour name of as person who did not legally exist and had no formal photo ID in that name.


Then they all waited 20 years for the dust to settle, and for all the nearby land to be fully developed coming out of Gloucester, so that the next land that will be ready for development and adding council services will be properties in Haywicks that border the canal. They were also hoping that the only daughter of the Late Herbert Henry Butler, Valerie Ann Butler, who has sole right to Haywicks Farm on the death of her father, would have died by now. However, the conspirators could not wait any longer, so the Freemason businessman Peter Leslie Urquhart, who was selected by Eggletons, his  attorneys for over 30 years, to front for the other conspirators to have Haywicks Farm registered in his and his wife Jaqueline Ann Urquhart's names, so that it could be quietly transferred of the name that did not legally exist.


Eggleton Solicitors and the powerful Freemason Eggleton family who run Edgon Estates, were struck off as attorneys by the Legal Complaints Tribunal and all their clients and legal files were taken over by powerful Freemason Attorneys Madge Lloyd Gibson and its was Madge Lloyd Gibson who deliberately and knowingly presented a false and fraudulent will to the Gloucestershire Probate Office in August, 1990 to help the conspirators have Haywicks Farm registered in a name that does not legally exist, with the long term plan of eventually transferring Haywicks Farm title into the name of Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart when the time was right.
So the conspirators had to make out it all was a normal sale of Haywicks Farm to Peter Leslie Urquhart and Jaqueline Ann Urquart by publicly advertising the property, however none of the 100 other interested purchasers of Haywicks Farm were interested in making an offer to purchase the property because any sale contract would have to include an overage deed, which meant that for the next 20 years, if the property has development approval obtained by the Stroud Council, then the purchasers of  the property will have to pay the Vendor ( who is behind the scenes a group of powerful Freemason business men and attorneys  who used a name of a person who did not exist to obtain the rights to the property) 50% of the increased value as a result of the development approval. This means that if the value of Haywicks Farm increases from the original sale price around 660,000 pounds to 20 million with the next 20 years, then the purchasers of Haywicks Farm would have to pay these powerful Freemason solicitors and businessmen around 10 million pounds on top of the original 660,000 pounds purchase price in 2011.
Unfortunately for the conspirators, Valerie Ann Butler, even though very sick and elderly, has not died as yet and requested help from the INL News Legal and Investigative Team to get Haywicks Farm back for her form these evil and greedy conspirators who have spent the best part of  30 years planning and scheming how to end up with the title deed of Haywicks Farm into one of their names without being able to be challenged on the future by Valerie Ann Butler and/or one of her children and/or grand children.
The conspirators tried to quietly transfer the title deed of Haywicks Farm into the name of Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart in February, 2011 however the INL News Legal and Investigative Team have been legally blocking such transfer since December, 2010.
So the conspirators had call in the help of their powerful corrupt Freemason High Court Masters, Judges and clerks and HM Registry adjudicators, and lawyers working inside the HM Registry Office who have been prepared to act in a very obvious corrupt and/or wrongful way to help the conspirators have the title deed of Haywicks Farm registered in the name of Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart. 
Some of the powerful corrupt Freemason lawyers, attorneys, High Court Masters, Judges and clerks and HM Registry adjudicators, and lawyers working inside the HM Registry Office which included females who are not Freemasons who have obviously been bribed  and/or offered some promotion in their jobs in some way who have been prepared to act in a very obvious corrupt and/or wrongful way to help the conspirators have the title deed of Haywicks Farm registered in the name of  Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart include the following:
1.       High Court Master Teverson- Well known senior Freemason
2.       High Court Judge _ Justice Mann- Well known senior Freemason
3.       High Court Judge _ Justice David Richards - Well known senior Freemason
4.       High Court Judge – Justice Paul Morgan
5.       Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry
6.       Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant Land Registrar in Gloucester
7.       Various corrupt freemason clerks and other  staff in the HM Land Registry Office in Gloucestershire
8.       Various corrupt Freemason  clerks and other  staff  in the Office to the Adjudicator  to the HM Land Registry
9.       Various corrupt Freemason clerks and other staff in the London High Court of Justice
10.    Lawyers Madge Lloyd Gibson well known Freemason lawyers
11.    Lawyers Rickerbys, who Colin Gibson who was one of the original partners in Madge Lloyd Gibson now is a partner of and used his new firm’s powerful freemason contacts in the High Court of Justice, the Office to the HM Land Registry and the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry to help act in corrupt and/or wrongful ways to help by pass all the High Court legal actions and applications pending and help ignore a court order made by a High Court Judge ordering that the title deed of Haywicks Farm be registered in the name of Valerie Ann Butler
12.    Lawyer Langley Wellingtom Lawyers
13.    Eggleton Solicitors and the Eggleton Family who own and run Egdon Estates
14.    Attorney Marie-Clair Bleasdale of Radcliffe Chambers in London
15.    Other various powerful and well connected Freemason Attorneys.
16.    Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquart
The current situation is that while English Pnesioner, Valerie Ann Butler is visiting her grand children and other family in Australia and has been ruled by her doctors as unfit to travel back to England for a while, the Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant to the HM Land Registrar have with the help of corrupt HM Treasury attorneys and lawyers conspired together in a corrupt and wrongful way to help the conspirators to bypass High Court claims and applications and appeals rights and write letters that are full of false statements and misleading statement and false and misleading legal arguments to try and have the title deed of Haywicks Farm  illegally, corruptly and/or wrongly registered in the name of Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquart.
The INL News Legal and Investigative Team have been researching and investigating the operations of High Court of Justice in England and Wales, the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry, Treasury Solicitors, UK Border Agency, The Prime Minister of the UK’s office and HM Land Registry over the last five years in secret undercover operation and have found that illegal, wrongful and corrupt actions as going on a regular basis and the power of anyone connected to the London Jewish Mafia and/or the Freemasons to able to obtain any wrongful and/or corrupt court and/or adjudication orders, have documents and correspondence disappear,  official letters not sent advising people of court hearing dates,  letters and applications requesting court hearing simply disappearing and other important documents have simply disappeared from court files, in many instances never to be seen again.
The INL News Investigation and Legal Team have found that there is quite an obvious corrupt and wrongful net work of people working within the London High Court of Justice, HM Land Registry, HM Treasury Solicitors and the office of the Adjudicator to HM Land Registry using their power in an illegal, wrongful and corrupt way to help powerful London Jewish Mafia and Freemason connections obtain what orders they want at any level of the HM Land Registry adjudication process and/or the High Court process and in the end corrupt staff such as Owen Rhys acting as Adjudicator to HM Land Registry and Katharine Brothers acting as assistant to HM Land Registrar  just take the law into their own hands with the help of corrupt Lawyers and Attorneys working for HM Treasury Solicitors to write their letters, judgements and  responses for them to make it all look like they are acting within the law, but in actual fact present letters. Judgement and responses full of false and misleading statements and facts and false and misleading legal arguments.
We have a situation that at present Katharine Brothers acting as Assistant to the HM Land Registrar in Gloucester sending out a letter with her name on it, pretending that she has written the letters, however it was written by a HM Treasury Lawyer and/or Attorney, who wants to hide behind Katharine Brothers, so if anything goes wrong and the whole conspiracy is publicly exposed as it is about to be in this article that is about to be presented worldwide in the International  Media, the Freemason HM Treasury Lawyer or Attorney who really wrote the letter dated the 3rd May, 2012 signed by Katharine Brothers as Assistant to the HM Land Registrar addressed to Valerie Ann Butler, which is full of false and misleading statements of fact and false and misleading legal arguments, can leave Katharine Brothers to publicly and legally take the fall.
This is who the Freemason work. They put an female up front who is not a Freemason, but is willing to act in a wrongful and/or corrupt and/or illegal way to help Freemasons whom are more seniors in their department, by the offer of a good promotion and a secure work life if they do what they are told and do not ask questions.
They advise clerks like Katharine Brothers that they are safe in presenting false and misleading letters to people because they can always just say, “ hey, the letter was drafted by a senior HM Treasury Attorney, and I just put my name to it and signed it believing that a senior Government attorney had  done their job in a correct manner. At the same time never exposing the name of corrupt HM Treasury Attorney who prepared and draft the false and fraudulent letter to Valerie Ann Butler dated the 3rd May, 2012 which was not even sent out in hard copy and only emailed to Valerie Ann Butler, knowing that Valerie Ann Butler was in hospital and very sick and more than likely not see he email till it was too late , and he family farm in Haywicks Lane has already by illegally, fraudulently and corruptly and wrongly transferred into the names of two of  the main conspirators  Peter Leslie and Jaqueline Ann Urquhart.
 
Note
This article may be published word wide in the next seven days, unless there is an injunction ordered by the High Court stopping to publication of this article. Also the INL News Group always likes to send the draft article out to those being written about, so they have a fair right of reply which will be published along side this article, so that everyone concerned with this matter can have their say in public, so the general public can see all sides of the story from everyone’s point of view.
 
INL News Legal and Investigative Team
Email: news:inlnews.com
8th May, 2012
 





SherForce_and_Claire_Lewis_Sandbrook_Head_of_Sherforce-Enforcement_and_Mr-Richardson_Head_of_SherForce_of-The-High-Court-Justice_On_Behalf_Of_Jonathan_Barry_Kandler_have_Corruptly_Used-The-Name_Of_The_High_Court-Of_Justice_Chancery_Division_and_Kenneth_ClarkeQC_and_The_Lord_High-Chancellor-And_House-of-Commons_To-By-Pass-All-The_Normal-Correct-Legal-Procedures_to-Illegally-Evict-Janice-Pritchard-and_Robert_Carter_From_Their-Home_at_1_Garratt_Close_Beddington_Surry_Sutton_on_1st_April_2011

Need some money laundered:
Call us or our other money laundering Legal Firm-
Ingram-Winter-Green,
Nathan Tietelbuam and his Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited have laundered millions through us successfully each month...
We have the protection of our corrupt police Inspectors in The London Met at the Croyden-Police Station, Inspector Rushworth & Inspector Tandy To Protect us from prosecution and they have Constable-Owen ZT253  and Constable Turley ZT479 to have all opposition arrested on false charges to keep them quiet.
The system works well.
Read our success story below.... how we helped well known Corrupt Drug Money Laundering Nathan Tielbaun, defraud Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter of their home and possessions and with the help of Corrupt London Met Police and corrupt SherForce Employees, we were able to put them on the street for the weekend with no money ...no cloths... no possessions... no ID... no food...
A REAL-SUCCESS STORY FOR OUR CLIENTS NATHAN TIETELBAUN, Brian Bau, Fineland Investments Limited and  Fineland Properties Limited...

Bude-Nathan-Iwanier-Solicitors Master Minds behind inhuman illegal wrongfull criminal teatment of
Janice Pritchard and RobertCarter
Read the Full Story Below
Bude-Nathan-Iwanier-Solicitors-Photos-BackGround
Bude Nathan Iwanier
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade
Bridge Lane
London NW11 0QN
DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
Tel: 020 8458 5656
Fax: 020 8458 5065
Email: info@bnilaw.co.
 
 Jonathan Barry Kandler

Jonathan_Barry Kandler_BudeNathanIwanier-Solicitors
Jonathan was admitted as a solicitor in May 1983. He joined Bude Nathan Iwanier as a Consultant in November 1994 and now heads up the Litigation department.
His work for large property holding groups and private clients has included both residential and commercial landlord and tenant disputes, work with the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal and collection of ground rent and service charges, as well as dealing with cases concerning assured short hold tenants and tenants protected under the Rent Acts.
Outside work, Jonathan enjoys extra curricula study and spending time with his family. Jonathan is also involved in work on behalf of local educational institutions on a pro-bono basis, and sits on two school fundraising committees.
 
Bude Nathan Iwanier is a leading commercial property and litigation law firm in the United Kingdom providing comprehensive services to clientele ranging from the local to the international.
The close relationship we have maintained with the industry is based on the expertise we have developed in our chosen areas of specialization and our in-depth awareness and understanding of the property trade and its investors and developers. Bude Nathan Iwanier is a law firm in the business of providing legal services to corporate UK, international and entrepreneurial clients. At Bude Nathan Iwanier, we thrive on our uncompromising dedication to provide innovative practical solutions to all varieties of complex transactions of a property nature.
Our ethos of excellence is underpinned by an emphasis on providing quality, service and precision to the needs of our clients. We advise on a comprehensive range of legal services including property, commercial real estate, corporate litigation and private client. Our clientele is vast and complex, as is our innovative approach in providing them with the commercial solutions they desire. We value our clients’ interests as if they were our own and in so doing we strive to continually provide to our clients a service that consistently exceeds all expectations
 
Messrs Bude Nathan Iwanier Direct Fax: 020 8731 7204
Bude Nathan Iwanier-SolicitorsBude Nathan Iwanier
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade
Wednesday 16th March 2011
 
Allegegations of Money Laundering have been made in the court cases associated with Nathan Tieitelbaum-Fineland Investment/Properties Limited-Attorneys-Ingram_Winter_Green-Heritable Bank & Others- 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey CR0 4PW
 
Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade
Bridge Lane
London NW11 0QN
 
Tel:+44 (20) 8458 5656 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (20) 8458 5656      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065
DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
www.bnilaw.co.uk
 
 
Bude Nathan Iwanier-SolicitorsBude Nathan Iwanier
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade
Bridge Lane
London NW11 0QN
DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
Tel: 020 8458 5656
Fax: 020 8458 5065
Email: info@bnilaw.co.
Bude Nathan Iwanier is a leading commercial property and litigation law firm in the United Kingdom providing comprehensive services to clientele ranging from the local to the international.
The close relationship we have maintained with the industry is based on the expertise we have developed in our chosen areas of specialization and our in-depth awareness and understanding of the property trade and its investors and developers. Bude Nathan Iwanier is a law firm in the business of providing legal services to corporate UK, international and entrepreneurial clients. At Bude Nathan Iwanier, we thrive on our uncompromising dedication to provide innovative practical solutions to all varieties of complex transactions of a property nature.
Our ethos of excellence is underpinned by an emphasis on providing quality, service and precision to the needs of our clients. We advise on a comprehensive range of legal services including property, commercial real estate, corporate litigation and private client. Our clientele is vast and complex, as is our innovative approach in providing them with the commercial solutions they desire. We value our clients’ interests as if they were our own and in so doing we strive to continually provide to our clients a service that consistently exceeds all expectations
 
 Jonathan Barry Kandler


Jonathan_Barry Kandler_BudeNathanIwanier-Solicitors
Jonathan was admitted as a solicitor in May 1983. He joined Bude Nathan Iwanier as a Consultant in November 1994 and now heads up the Litigation department.
His work for large property holding groups and private clients has included both residential and commercial landlord and tenant disputes, work with the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal and collection of ground rent and service charges, as well as dealing with cases concerning assured short hold tenants and tenants protected under the Rent Acts.
Outside work, Jonathan enjoys extra curricula study and spending time with his family. Jonathan is also involved in work on behalf of local educational institutions on a pro-bono basis, and sits on two school fundraising committees.

 Aaron Emanuel Bude (Mendy)

Aaron Emanuel Bude (Mendy) _BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors
 
Mendy is one of the founding partners of the practice. He graduated from LSE and gained his initial legal experience at a leading city firm, Berwin Leighton which he used as a springboard to develop his own practice.
He has over 20 years experience in commercial property law and in particular specialises in retail property portfolios including acquisitions, sales, leases, banking, property development and landlord and tenant issues.
His client base includes listed Plc’s and major private property investment companies and trusts.
He is also an active member of his community and provides significant pro bono services to institutions and individuals.
 
 Bernard Dubiner (Booky)

Bernard Dubiner (Booky)_BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors
Booky studied law at University College London and graduated in the year 1999 before taking the Legal Practice Course at The College of Law. He joined Bude Nathan Iwanier in 2000.
Booky specialises in commercial and residential property working on a broad range of transactions across all disciplines.
He acts on the purchase and sale of investment properties, portfolio restructuring and financing as well as general landlord and tenant transactions for commercial retail clients.
He also advises on landlord and tenant law, in particular business tenancies and the new changes to the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954.
 
 Daniel Gideon Zysblat

Daniel Gideon Zysblat_BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors 
 
Daniel joined Bude Nathan Iwanier as a trainee in January 1995. He deals with purchases and sales of commercial and residential properties, acting for many private property investment companies, and dealing with large portfolios. He also has considerable experience in dealing with Landlord and Tenant disputes and dilapidations.
Outside work, Daniel has been a magistrate since 2002 and also sits on the Family bench.
 
 Nathan-Naftalie_Iwanier

Nathan-Naftalie_Iwanier_BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors
Nathan is one of the founding partners at Bude Nathan Iwanier. He qualified as a solicitor in 1976 and following qualification worked at Kuit Steinart Levy until 1981. In 1981 Nathan joined the partnership at R G Freeman & Co until he set up partnership at Bude Nathan Iwanier in 1989. Nathan specialises in commercial and residential property as well as commercial Landlord and Tenant work
 
 Vivian_Naftali_Vernick


  Vivian_Naftali_Vernick_BudeNathanIwanierSolicitors
 
Vivian obtained his law degree at the City of London Polytechnic and joined Grangewoods for his articles. Following work as an assistant solicitor at Green David Conway, he joined Bude Nathan Iwanier in 1992.
He acts for a variety of commercial property clients dealing with all aspects of relevant law.
Vivian specialises in development work and advising on property law and landlord and tenant matters.
 
Statement of truth signed by Janice Pitchard lodged in the High Court of Justice Chancery Division
On April 1st 2011, in the afternoon, I opened the door to a delivery man and a bailiff pushed his way in with his foot and body, followed by another man and a police officer. I was forceably ejected from my home. I was manhandled. A man picked me up and threw me out bodily. I was very frightened and I didn't know what to do. There were two men from, I believe, a divisionn of Sherwins as I saw a badge on one of them that said: “Sherforce”. The taller male from Sherwins threw me out. The officers were both aggressive when they threw me out and they treated me with distaste and contempt. The police officer was a fair, blue eyed male I will describe and refer to later. I was not sure why Sherwins had the police there as their “agents” and “enforcers”. The fair officer told me that I had to leave the house. He seemed to be directing operations. The other two men were fairly quiet, that is the men from Sherwins. There may have been another police officer with the fair one.
 
I wasn't able to collect anything that I needed or argue my case, in that my son had a right of tenure and was not mentioned on the notice from the court. I was also unable to explain that service of the order had not been effected, in that I have only ever received from solicitors acting for Fineland a sealed order from Bude, Nathan, Iwanier Solicitors, but that this was not sufficient to obtain a warrant of execution. I couldn't explain that this meant that the warrant of execution must have been obtained by fraud or negligence. The order came through the post from Bude, Nathan, Iwanier Solicitors. It is a sealed order, however, there is no sealed judgment, that sets out the reasons and grounds for the order, subsequent to a trial of the issues (which by the way took place without me being present, without me having any legal representation in a complex matter, and now it would appear, without reasons for refusing an adjournment of the trial, cited by Mr Butcher's at the RCJ, as they are “missing”). The only document that was sent to me in the post, apart from the sealed order from Bude, Nathan, Iwanier Solicitors, was one titled “draft judgment”, and it does not contain a court seal. I have scanned and emailed to you, by way of service of this document, a letter from Mr Butchers, Associate, Royal Courts of Justice, saying that there is no judgment filed with the court: it is “missing”. There is no sealed and filed copy of the judgment and it hasn't been served on me by the court. I also scan and email to you an excerpt from the Civil Procedure Rule, Part 40.4 which deals with how service of orders and judgments must be effected. I also do not think that a sealed order has ever been served on me, as I have said, because it was posted to me by Bude, Nathan, Iwanier Solicitors, not by the court. Without service of the judgment, I understand, service of the order is not effected. In any event, I don't think service of the order was effected either the court record doesn't record that there is a sealed order and one wasn't sent to me by the court. I will return to this point again later. I wanted to add and say too that I have never been served with the reasons for Ms Foster, the trial judge, refusing me a right to appeal. This is something that is required, as a matter of law and procedure, as is proper filing and service of orders and judgments. Mr. Butchers told me that the reasons for refusing permission to appeal were written but were missing along with a copy of the sealed judgement and sealed order. His file and copy file were missing, that is what he told me. I ended up with a copy of the sealed order, that the court doesn't have, incorrectly served, I think, a draft judgement only, and no sight of the reasons for Ms. Foster refusing permission to appeal. As far as I am aware they were still missing as the time to appeal ran out. In the event I did not hear from Mr Butchers that the missing documents had been found at any time and they were never served by the court itself. The warrant of execution, therefore, was invalid and void.
 
My son was out when the enforcers came initially. I presume these people waited for him to go before gathering outside, because I believe they knew he had right of tenure and he couldn't be removed. Ithink they knew that there was no enforceable order and judgment. If Mr Kandler, who obtained this warrant of execution, knew that the order was not enforceable, that amounts to offences of: aggravated trespass, (attempted) fraud, (attempted) theft, perjury, or akin to, concealment of evidence, attempt to pervert the course of justice, intimidation of witnesses and effecting a public mischief. These offences I think may have taken place as part of a conspiracy, an agreement. If Mr Kandler didn't know of the law and procedure and that he could not take possession because of my stay of execution in relation to the matter, then he should answer for his actions as they appear to be negligent. He did not address the court as to the law and procedure in this matter which he must do professionally, as a matter of ethics, if a party is unrepresented. All parties are required to address one another on the law, I thought. It is derived as a matter of professional conduct from the common law about ensuring equality of arms.
 
At the scene, at the time I was been forceably ejected from my home, and my son's home, a short woman, with straggly unkempt hair of an indeterminate colour, wide in girth, approx. 4 feet 11 inches tall, between 40 and 50 years of age, in motorbike leathers, arrived on a motorbike which a man was riding. The male was younger than the woman, about 30 to 40 years of age, tall, on the thin side, maybe average build, with brown wavy hair. I should make it clear that when I asked someone when I was forced bodily outside if I could have time to remove things the tall enforcer said, “ask her”, pointing to the short wide woman. She refused to look at me and talk to me, or give me her name. She said to me, when she was pointed at, like a well trained dog, by the police officer: “I am here for Mr. Kandler”. She was disdainful and haughty. I repeat: she would not even look at me. I then saw 3 men in a white van parked by the garages next to my house. I went up to them to talk to them. I asked them if they were anything to do with the bailiffs. They didn't appear to speak much English or understand me. I asked them for their card as there was no name on the van. They made no comment. The short woman spoke for them and said they were builders who were taking over my property and would be living there. She couldn't bear to look at me but she was directing operations as if I didn't exist. I was horrified and very upset. I asked for the name of the representative of Mr Kandler but she replied: “I am here for Mr Kandler”. She refused to talk to me, so I could not, I presume, ask her to arrange the removal of my property.
 
A man had quickly changed all the locks, and grinned at me when I said someone else had rights over the property. I was heartbroken for my son. I was also heartbroken as there was cash and jewellery in the property and other valuable possessions, many with sentimental value, that simply cannot be replaced. I felt like I had been violated, raped in a way, and burgled. My home had been taken over. People were taking over my home and I thought about men in my house rummaging through my possessions. I thought about wanting to kill myself. My son arrived, as I was on the phone to a friend. I was desperate. I was hoping my legal friends would help me. The blue eyed, fair officer, went away after the locks had been changed, but I refused to leave. I did not see why I should leave my property and my son's property. You might also like to know at this point that I currently hold legal and equitable title to the property – as per office copy entry 4 April 2011. Because I was defending my property, and my son's property, by refusing to leave, more police arrived with the fair haired one and talked to me in an uncaring manner. I did not want to leave and I wanted to defend my property.
 
I was on the phone when the police arrived. After a short time, after about 15 mins, my phone was snatched from my hand and my arms were twisted behind my back which hurt me and handcuffs clipped on. The cuffs were ratcheted up really tightly. It was the fair, blue eyed officer, who snatched my phone and twisted my arm without warning aided by PC Turley. I was arrested so forceably that I could not but struggle, and they went beyond what was necessary and proportionate. My arms were twisted so high the pain was searing and the cuffs so tight, that they left bloody marks and brusing, I was caused to try to seek to avoid the pain the officers were causing me. I was not resisting in any way when they arrested me. I am not alleged to have resisted violently or at all. I was desperately trying to call for help on my phone. I was marched to a police van and locked in the back without a seat belt and I fell about as the driver, the fair haired one, was going quite fast. I was then “processed”. I felt I wasn't human and I wanted to die, being so traumatised.
 
I would like to ask the three police constables at the scene – PC Turkey, PC Owen and the fair, blue eyed male – whether they know what their job is. They did not behave like “justices of the peace”: as per Lord Denning. I didn't resist them and I do not know what time they had to obtain evidence about the matter before an arrest that they undertook took place. The woman “for Kandler” or the man on the bike called the police – she told me they had, I didn't see them do it. None of the officer's had notebooks at the scene, that I saw. I didn't see any report of the scene being recorded. PC Owen says on tape in police interview under caution that he took witness statements at the scene. I think he must be confused. He only took a statement from one process server and one builder, and that was at the scene. My son says that he saw no evidence being obtained at the scene when he was there. It must have been taken after my arrest. I believe there was collusion between the witnesses and the evidence is tainted because their statements which were read to me in interview were almost word for word the same. My friend Stephen Carew-Reid, I think, has the collar number for the blue eyed, fair male officer that directed and enforced my bodily removal from my home, and who was party to my arrest, that I do not have the details for.
 
I was arrested and cuffed by PC Owen for aggravated trespass, as I have explained. I felt like I was dreaming by this point. I was in severe pain. I cannot recall if PC Owen cautioned me. The police acted as agents and enforcers for Fineland Investments Ltd and Mr Kandler for and on behalf of Nathan, Bude, Iwanier Solicitors. They were cruel in their treatment. They subjected me to inhumane and degrading treatment, in that, the arrest was not proportionate and necessary and they did not act, at that time, to ensure I could obtain my personal possessions that related to maintaining my dignity, and my son's dignity. I was flung on to the street without underwear and clothing, money and other essential items. We have no access to our phone chargers so our phones have died, and no-one can get in touch. My son's medication is still there as is important paperwork and important legal documents. I am concerned legal evidence may have been tampered with, evidence in this case. They could not have cared less about my dignity nor my son's. My son was at the scene of my arrest, so even if the officers thought they were right to arrest me for aggravated trespass, they should have ensured our dignity was preserved. My son was not under arrest, he could have been helped to “keep the peace” and to respect our human rights, which are part of English law, and actionable in the English courts. He should have been allowed to collect possessions. The police officers were rude and quite aggressive.
 
PC Owen said to me: “If you don't get off your phone you will be arrested”. That is not a ground for arrest. Did PC Owen intend to arrest me, with reasonable suspicion, for making calls for help? The arrest was wholly unlawful. As was my dehumanising and frightening experience in custody – I was falsely imprisoned. PC Owen in substance didn't have grounds to arrest me for aggravated trespass as I cannot trespass in my home (my home for the reasons explained). He couldn't arrest my son either because of his tenure, but my son can detail his experience, which I witnessed. He was not under arrest. He was threatened with arrest despite there being no grounds and told he would get a criminal record if he did not move. He could not defend himself against 3 police officers including PC Owen who had threatened to send him to prison for doing nothing. It was not a fair fight. And my son was shocked and scared. PC Owen didn't say I had done anything wrong that I could be arrested for, he just told me I had to to get off the phone.
 
The police, after they attended to enforce our forceable removal from the property, came back as I explained. They did not witness any alleged incident of aggravated trespass. I had been treated like a criminal by the blue eyed, blond officer, who grinned at my shock and distress. After I refused to leave the short wide woman said to me she had called the police back, and the police arrived with a van. Shortky after they arrived, and after I had tried to make calls for help, PC Owen, like a petulant and damaging father telling off an innocent child, to get off the phone. I am a woman of 62 years of age. I was treated like I was a child that was doing something seriously wrong. I was trying to phone my legal representative and a friend. I explained to PC Turley the legal position about my son and his legal and equitable title to the property. She seemed sympathetic initially but she assisted with the arrest. There was another officer in the background, the one with short fair hair, 30 years odd, with blue eyes, as I have said. He appeared to be psychotic as he had a strange grin on his face. I would remember his face tomorrow. He seemed amused by the whole incident. I thought he could be dangerous because I thought he could be psychotic. As he was Director of Operations I was very frightened.
 
When the phone was grabbed out of my hand and PC Turley and this officer twisted my arms, I was told to stop struggling as if I had a choice about that. The pain was so bad given the incorrect way they put the handcuffs on (I believe intentionally or recklessly, or negligently) and the pressure they had applied that all I could think about was the pain. The arrest was brutal and inhumane. I was not resisting nor was I aggressive. These officers that arrested me knew not what they were doing and they put me in to a catatonic state because of their treatment. This happened shortly after I was arrested. The police were, I repeat, brutal and, therefore, inhumane. In the van I asked PC Turley to remove the handcuffs as they were very painful, but she refused saying, “don't struggle, you will make it worse”. But I had to try to manoeuvre myself to stop the pain. At the station I saw that my wrists were very red and quite deeply scratched. The skin was cut. That is assault occassioning actual bodily harm if PC Owen intended or was reckless as to whether he caused me to sustain immediate and unlawful violence. The officers degraded me in my neighbourhood and they degraded me in front of my son At the station some of the officers were respectful and caring to me and watched me in the cell as they appeared to think that I was vulnerable. I was very vulnerable. I did feel that I wished I was dead as I was so embarassed and hurt in every way. I felt violated and inhuman.
 
My son arrived at the station sometimed hlater, but we were not allowed to see each other at all , and I was so worried for him, but it appears that they were fairly respectful to him. But all the time I was there my heart was beating very rapidly with intense shock fear and panic. I did see a doctor, but he did not take my blood pressure. He said I was fit. He didn't say in his custody record FME report whether the cuts I sustained as a result of my arrest were recent even though the scabs were formed of fresh blood.
 
My legal friend Miss Palmer has been undermined and abused when trying to do her job by police. She is a complete professional and a very experienced advocate so this was completely uncalled for.

Statement of Truth signed by Robert Carter onthe 3rd April 2011 lodged with
the High Court of Justice Chancerey Division
 
On the 1st of April, early afternoon, I arrived at my house having been informed by my mother that she had been manhandled out of our house. She had texted me to ask me to ring her. This was when I was in the library. When I got there there were policemen, some men next to a van and 2 persons next to a motorbike. She was extremely upset and trying to reason with all the people around her. I approached and said hello to my mother. One of the policemen asked me who I was and I introduced myself to him as her son. I was extremely worried by the situation seeing so many people around. My mother was talking to one of the officers explaining that there was a dispute between herself and a property company. My mother informed me that she had been served with something and had been forcibly manhandled out of our house without a chance to go to the toilet or even get a drink of water. I went over and stood next to my mother who was making some phone calls and trying to sort the situation out. All this time the atmosphere was very intimidating with a large group of people seemingly surrounding us.
 
A taller policeman came over and introduced himself as Owen and said that as the leading officer he would be dealing with the situation. My mother was still on the phone at this point and he said “Get off the phone now or you will be arrested for obstruction”. His tone was extremely threatening. My mother finished her phone call and he said that the people on the bike had served my mother with a court order and we both had to leave immediately. My mother tried to explain that there was an ongoing dispute between us and a property company. He went over to the woman next to the bike to talk to her. My mother then made another phone call while we were waiting. After a few minutes he came back and said that the woman was an enforcer and had a legal order and that was that. My mother said that we had some papers in the house that would prove her ownership if we could just look for them or all they had to do was check the Land Registry website to get the correct information. A short officer with fair hair and a pained expression chimed in and said that asked “Do you have the deeds?” We explained that this wasn't necessary as the information could be checked online. PC Owen then closed down the conversation by saying that there was an order and that was the end of the matter. My mum then started talking on the phone again to check something and Owen then raised his voice saying “Get off the phone NOW!” in an extremely rude and threatening manner. My mother carried on talking so the fair haired officer grabbed her phone and twisted her arm behind her back and put handcuffs on her. Owen then said “You are under arrest for Aggravated Trespass”, grabbed her phone and pulled her away towards a waiting van in the most undignified way possible. I tried to follow but 2 officers jumped in my way. As she was hauled away Owen turned and looked at me. I stood in front of the house and said that I needed to try and sort this out. Owen then said “You have to leave as well.” in a threatening way. I had no idea what my rights were so I said “Can I at least go into the house to collect some possessions like some clothes and loose cash. Also some medication that I am taking and some important forms” and the fair haired officer said “No we already asked your mother if she wanted to collect her possessions and she said no so you are not allowed and you have to leave.” I later found out this was a complete lie. Owen then approached me and stated that I could leave “as a free man” or I would be arrested and put in the van on the same charge as my mother and would get a criminal record. I had no idea what to do against 3 PC's and a number of others so I left.
 
Shortly after I received a phone call from my mother saying that she had informed them that I was vulnerable and that would send a car for me to go to the police station. Owen than turned up in a car and drove me to Sutton police station. I was made to wait for several hours in a back room with no information and no idea what the hell was going on. Eventually my mother was bailed.
The whole situation was extremely distressing and intimidating with no regard for our feelings or safety.
I intend to sue everyone involved for damages and so I believe is my mother..
.
 
 
Statement of truth
3-4-2011
 

INL News Legal and Investigations Group

INL News Legal and Investigation Team
David.Rosen@inlnews.com, admin@inlnews.com
Subject:

[FWD: FinelandInvestments Limited 800,000 pounds dirty money form overseas send to Ingram Winter Green]
From:
<david.rosen@inlnews.com> (Add as Preferred Sender)  
Date: Wed, Apr 13, 2011 3:25 am
To: SRuffles@blg.co.uk, "Jonathan Kandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, admin@inlnews.com, admin@jamison.biz
Cc: "Simon Jackson" <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>, "n.hibbert@kennedys-law.com" <n.hibbert@kennedys-law.com>, "l.maiden@kennedys-law.com" <l.maiden@kennedys-law.com>, "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>





Sophie Ruffles
Associate
Direct Telephone:             +44 207 643 8407 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 207 643 8407      end_of_the_skype_highlighting      
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9258
Mobile:  
Email: SRuffles@blg.co.uk



Fineland Investments Limited 800,000 pounds dirty money from overseas send to Ingram Winter Green
Fineland Investments Limited RBS Bank October 2008 Statement13 April 2008


Fineland Investments Limited Bank account statement with Royal Bank of Scotland
Investigations by the INL News Group's legal ahnd accounting investigation team show clearly that Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited, Northern Holdings Limited, Solicitors Ingram Winter Green, Solicitors Bude, Nathan Iwanier, Solicitors Denniss Matthews, Borough of Sutton, and others arr heavily involved with moving hundreds of million of laudered black money make form selling illegal drugs  through their various bank accounts with Heritable Bank and Barclays Bank and other banks. This is part of the trillions of pounds moved through Barclays Bank in London every year by various people and organisation as fromnt for the Rothschild Family who are involved world wide with having agents to sell illegal drugs from which they make trillions of pounds each year from the misery and deaths it causes ordinary people. because the Rothchilds have about 60% of the worlds wealth and effectly sanction all the appointment of all Britsh Prime Ministers and Chancellors and the USA Presidents, and they can make sure with their powerful connections that there is never any investigations into the trillions of pounds of illegal drug moeny laundered through Barclays Bank in London each year by their agents such as powerful solicitors Ingram Winter Green, Bude Nathan, Iwanier, Denniss Matthews, Barlow Lyde and Gilbert, Finsburns and people like Nathan Tietelbaun and his Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited and Nothern Holdings Limited
Jamison and Associates: Investigative Accountants and Attorneys
admin@jamison.biz www.jamison.biz Tel: +44 (0) 740 724 7764 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 740 724 7764      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Urgent Attention Duty Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy
Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479
Met Police, Sutton Police Station London Tel:  0208 7731212 Fax:  0208 649 0790
 
 
2nd April 2011
 
Urgent Attention: Fishburn Solicitors, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP, London Met Police, Corrupt Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy and constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Met Number ZT 479 of the London Sutton Met Police, Sherforce, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Denniss Matthews Solicitors

Conspiracy to Defraud, money laundering, unlawfully and wrongfully threatened damage unlawful and immoral Physical and mental harassment, assault, robbery , physical and psychological damages, conspiracy ot pervert the course of justice, contempt of court, breaking and entering, stealing electricity gas and water and/or helping to cover  up all these criminal and civil wrongs committed by and/or with know of Fishburn Solicitors, Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Denniss Mathews Solicitors,Tony Nurse, SherForce Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP and their partners and solicitors, Fineland Investments Limited, Nathan Tietelbaun,  Sher Force,  the London Met Police including Inspector Rushworth- constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Met Number ZT 479- Inspector Neil Tandy, Commisisoner of police of the London Met Police and others.
You all have along with other civil and criminal wrongs conspired ot be involved with the deliberate theft of Gas Electricty and Water from Janice Pritchard, Robert and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid form the roperty known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW. It is noted in Particular that Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy of the London Met Police stationed at the Sutton Police Station has worked ina corrupt and wrongful manner in a clear breach of his duties as a police officer to deliberately has been happy to work in with the unknown criminal and thugs that all the herein named conspirators to refuse to arrest and charge the thugs and criminal that have forcefully taken possession of the property at  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW for deliberately stealing gas, water and electricity from Janice Pritchard, Robert and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid. This is a clear criminal offence and Inspector Rushworth has over ridded all attempts by other London Met Police and staff to allow any London Met Police officer to attend at  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW to take the name and ID’s pf all thise wrongfully in possession of the property and arrest and charge them for illegally using gas, electricity and water at the property belonging to Janice Pritchard, Robert and Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid
The London Met Police with the help of constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 and Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy conspired on the 1st April 2011 to help the other conspirators named herein illegally remove and/or force Janice Pritchatd and Robert Carter to leave the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW. They did this by flaselyt and wrongfully arresting Janice Pritchard at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW on the 1st April 2011 with out any due and/or reasonable just course, when shed was rightfully there as a caretaker for the property on behalf of Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid who are the new owners of the property. They asaulted her and caused her extreme physical and psychological damages. Then  they wrongfully and illegally outside their normal duties as police officers acting as agent servants or otherwise for the other named conspirators named herein, told a false statement to Robert Carter by falsey saying that his mother Janice Pritchard does not want him to go into the property. Then they worngky and without any due and rightful  cause threatedned Robert carter with arrest for trespass if he did not immediately leave the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW, incircumsatnces that this property has been hi sonly home for over 16 years and there is no court order with his name of it that states that he has to leave the property and also in circumstances that John Carew-Reid has lodged a properly signed transfer for the property to go into his name at HM Land Registry and this is the rightful owner of the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW and John Carew-Reid has made both Janice Pritchard and Robert carter the caretakers of this property for their life time and has made Robert Carter the beneficial owner of the property.
Under the High Court decision of  Tony Webster v Sergeant Lampart Robert Carter and Janice Pritchard and John Carew-Reid have the right to sue the individual police officers involved and their employers being the other conspirators herein named for damages in common law, Statute Law and Tort Law including a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, conspiracy to defraud, and malefiance of public officers. With the common law tort of malefiance of a public officer, the public officer can not hide behind his badge and just  plead a defense that they were thought they were going their job, but got it wrong  There are many legal precedents that support the wronged litigant to sue public officers as individuals for damages and in the Tony Webster v Sergent Lampard case it was clearly established that a police officer can be personally sued if he or she goes outside his or her normal and accepted and fair duties as a police officer. This case is very similar to the current case of the wrongful arrest of Janice Pritchard for trespass, all because Janice Pritchard rightfully refused to leave her home where she was a rightful caretaker having been appointed by the new owner of the property John Carew-Reid and being a place where she had been living for over 16 years. Then their wrongs were compounded when the police officers The London Met Police with the help of constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 and Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy wrongfully threatened and/or gave authority to wrongfully threaten Robert Carter not to go into his rightful home to be able to get some of his belongings and that he would be immediately arrested by the London Met Police id he did not immediately leave the property and the versinity of the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW. In the Tony Webster v Seargent Lampard case Seargent Lampard walked into a fuel and food roadhouse and told the existing tenants who had been running the roadhouse for a number of years, that they has 5 minutes to pack up and leave the premises. It was a civil matter and the police should not have got involved without a court order listing the removal of all persons who had been living at and running the roadhouse for a number of years. This the current case of Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid against the Met Police and others, the London Met Police have helped the other named conspirators named herein to obtain control of  possession of the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surrey Sutton CR0 4PW by encouraging and supporting those who have just wrongly taken control of the property and have thus gone out of their way to interfere in a civil matter, and then actively supported these same conspirators by wrongly and unjustly and without proper cause arrested Janice Pritchard, the legal caretaker of the property for trespass and firstly lied to Robert Carter saying that his mum Janice Pritchard had told the police to tell Robert Carter that she does not want Robert going into the property and then wrongfully threatened Robert Carter that if he did not leave the premises and the versinity of the premises, the the police will immediately arrest him for a trespass. and he will have a criminal offence in his name. Now the London Met Police have compounded their civil and criminal wrongs but not arresting and charging those persons currently wrongly in possession of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW, for illegally using gas, electricity and gas that belongs to and being paid for by Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid. A couple of weeks ago it was widely publicized in the London Evening Standard that the owners of a multi million pound home in London and the London Met  Police were having removing some squatters form the home. Then the owner sof the property and the London Met Police realized that the squatters were using electricity gas and water belonging to someone else and that was clear theft. So on realizing this the London Met Police immediately went around to the property and arrested the squatters from the property for stealing gas, water and electricity. A number of reports since the 1st of April 2011 have been made to the London Met Police asking the police to go and arrest those in the home for stealing gas, electricity and water and the police phone operations section have stated that some police offers would attend the premises at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW and arrest those there illegally stealing gas, electricity and water. Some of these report number are 8268 of 2nd April 2011 and CAB 2587 of 2nd April 2011 and 82681 of 2nd April 2011. However Inspector Tandy and Inspector Rushworth have both gone out of their way to override other police officers authority if lower rank form going out to attend the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW to take the names of those who are at the property and arrest and charge them for illegally using and stealing electricity, gas and water being paid for and belonging the Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid. Thus these police officers and the whole of the London Met Police are nw accessory after the fact in the continuing offense of stealing gas, electricity and water and protecting those guilty of this crime as they are working for their other co-conspirators named herein who the police have powerful business and religious connections with being all powerful freemasons, Zionist Jews and Illuminati members.
There is no doubt when this debacle hits the world news headlines the police officers constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 and Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy will be swiftly and quickly brought before the Commissioner of Police and Scotland Yard and they will be stripped of the police badges and police rank lose their positions as London Met Police Officers and charged with conspiring to pervert the course of Justice, Conspiracy to Defraud, malicious and devious behavior, assault, failing to protect the property of Janice Pritchard, Robert carter and John Carew-Reid, threatening behavior, and the list goes on and on. They all the other conspirators as named herein will have to be named on the world internet and will have to hold in shame before their families and friends and the world as a whole for their not only illegal and wrongful behavior but their immoral and inhuman behavior, conspiring together to defrauds innocent people of their rightful home and possessions and placing them onto the street without any of their belongings, cloths, personal effects, money, ID, and other valuable belongings and no where to live on a Friday night to live on the street over a cold weekend. The operation was calculated and organized by the conspirators herein named so that it would take place on a Friday so time that Janice Pritchard was released on bail from  the Croyden Police Station (even if she obtained bail) with her son Robert Carter there to see that she was OK, the courts and lawyers officers would be closed till Monday to be able to start to get any legal help or redress on the wrongs done to them by the London Met Police and the other herein named conspirators.
The way the co-conspirators organised this devious, illegal, wrongful and immoral plan was to watch to first watch the property to see when Robert Carter who had been living at the property when out shopping. That way they knew that Janice Pritchard would be a defenseless old sick woman at home on her own. They knocked on the door and when Janice Pritchard opened the door she was faced with a group of about 10 men coming into the home and surrounding her home and they immediately pushed her out of the house by man handling her and scaring her. Then they went and had the locks changed and locked her out of the house with all her, Robert Carter’s and John Carew-Reid’s personal possessions in the home. Then they organized corrupt police officers being officers constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 and Inspector Rushworth and Inspector Tandy arrested Janice Pritchard to wrongfully arrest her for being trespassing on the property. Then Robert Carter came back a short time later from shopping and attempted to ether his home and was falsely told by officers constables Owen Met number ZT253-Constable Turley Number ZT 479 at first that his  mother Janice Pritchard had told the police to tell him that she did not want him to going into the property. Then Robert Carter stood by the front door and a short time later after seeing his mother Janice Pritchard was arrested, was told by the police that the same thing will happen to him if he does not immediately leave the premises and the varsinity of the premises. That is he will be arrested for a trespass of him own home where he has been living for over 16 years, and has a life right to be caretaker of the property with his mother Janice Pritchard and John Carew-Reid who purchased the property from Janice Pritchard holds the property in trust for him. There is no court action against Robert Carter and no Court order against Robert Carter to have him removed from the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Croyden Surry Sutton CR0 4PW.
 
 
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP-London
Beaufort House
15 St Botolph Street
http://www.blg.co.uk/7.aspx
London    EC3A 7NJ
For online map and SatNav systems please use: EC3A 7DT
Tel: +44 (0)20 7247 2277 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7247 2277      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax: 44 (0)20 7071 9000
John Hanson Special Counsel London and Singapore 44 (0)20 7643 7130 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 7130      end_of_the_skype_highlighting jhanson@blg.co.uk
Tony Nurse-Marsh Managing Partner (Oxford) +44 (0)20 7643 8598 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8598      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk
Neil Jamieson Partner London + 44 (0)20 7643 8030 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8030      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
njamieson@blg.co.uk

Katrina McAteer
In-house Counsel London +  44 (0)20 7643 7211
kmcateer@blg.co.uk

Clive O'Connell Partner London + (0)20 7643 8477
coconnell@blg.co.uk
Patricia Orr Associate Director London +44 (0)20 7643 7878 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7878      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
porr@blg.co.uk
James Parker Partner London + 44 (0)20 7643 7117 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 7117      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jparker@blg.co.uk
Timothy Parsons Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 7312
tparsons@blg.co.uk

Patrick Perry  Partner London
+ 44 (0)20 7643 7894
pperry@blg.co.uk

Claire Petts Partner London + 44 (0)20 7643 7698 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 7698      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
cpetts@blg.co.uk
James Preece
Partner Mancester + 44 (0)161 829 6436 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)161 829 6436      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jpreece@blg.co.uk
Ian Plumley Associate Director London +44 (0)20 7643 7810 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7810      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
iplumley@blg.co.uk
Julian Randall Partner London
+ 44 (0)20 7643 8592 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8592      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jrandall@blg.co.uk

Keith Richardson Partner London +
65 6578 6105
krichardson@blg.com.sg
James Roberts Partner London + 44 (0)20 7643 8549 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8549      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jroberts@blg.co.uk
Malcolm Rogerson Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8581 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8581      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mrogerson@blg.co.uk
Marianne Robson Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 7488 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 7488      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mrobson@blg.co.uk


Simon Konsta Senior Partner +
44 (0)20 7643 8085
skonsta@blg.co.uk
Miranda Karali
Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 8070 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 8070      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mkarali@blg.co.uk

Giles Kavanagh Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 8008
gkavanagh@blg.co.uk
Richard Keady Partner Hong Kong +852 2840 2683 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +852 2840 2683      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
rkeady@blg.com.hk
Maurice Kenton Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8566 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8566      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mkenton@blg.co.uk

David Knapp Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 8572
dknapp@blg.co.uk

Gaby Kaiser Associate Director + 44 (0)20 7643 8005 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8005      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
gkaiser@blg.co.uk
Catherine Kearney
Associate Director +44 (0)20 7643 7838 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7838      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
ckearney@blg.co.uk
Adam Lambert Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8029 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8029      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
alambert@blg.co.uk


Janet Lambert Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 8534
jlambert@blg.co.uk
Eurof Lloyd-Lewis Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 7447 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 7447      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
elloyd-lewis@blg.co.uk


Patric McGonigal Partner Singapore
+ 65 6578 6116
pmcgonigal@blg.com.sg
Roderic McLauchlan Partner London 44 (0)20 7643 8474 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 8474      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
rmclauchlan@blg.co.uk


Damian McPhun Partner London
+ 44 (0)20 7643 7337 dmcphun@blg.co.uk
Mike Munro 44 (0)20 7643 7348 mmunro@blg.co.uk


Robert Muttock Partner London +44 (0)161 829 6405 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 829 6405      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
rmuttock@blg.co.u

Estelle Machell Partner Mancester
+44 (0)161 240 2633
emachell@blg.co.uk

David MoonPartner Mancester +44 (0)161 240 2653 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2653      end_of_the_skype_highlighting dmoon@blg.co.uk

Chris Morrison:
Partner Mancester+44 (0)161 240 2655 cmorrison@blg.co.uk
Hugh Mullins Partner Mancester+44 (0)161 240 2656hmullins@blg.co.uk
Siobhan Mullins Partner Mancester 44 (0)161 240 2657
smullins@blg.co.uk

Chris Murray  Partner Mancester +44 (0)161 240 2659 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2659      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
cmurray@blg.co.uk

James Major Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 7815
jmajor@blg.co.uk
Marriam Malik
Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 8839 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8839      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mmalik@blg.co.uk

Marlene McConway Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 7671 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 7671      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mmcconway@blg.co.uk


http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/manchester.aspx
Manchester- Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
Chancery Place, 50 Brown Street, Manchester, M2 2JT, DX 14448 Manchester
Hong Kong, Barlow Lyde & Gilbert
19/F Cheung Kong Center 2 Queen's Road Central, Hong Kong
Tel: 852 2526 4202 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            852 2526 4202      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Fax: 852 2810 5994

http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/oxford.aspx
Oxford
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
420 Nash Court
Oxford Business Park Oxford  OX4 2RU
DX 155700 Oxford 1
Tel: +44 (0)1865 336600 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)1865 336600      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

Fax: +44 (0)1865 336611

http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/s%C3%A3o_paulo.aspx
São Paulo
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert
Av. Paulista, 1337 - 21°
Andar - cj.211
Bela Vista - São Paulo - SP
CEP 01311-200
Brazil
Tel:  + 55 (11) 3179 2900 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 55 (11) 3179 2900      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: + 55 (11) 3179 2914


Shanghai 
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/shanghai.aspx
Suite 2601-2602 26/F Azia Center
1233 Lujiazui Ring Road
Shanghai 200120 PRC
Tel: +86 21 6169 1500                            
Fax: +86 21 6169 1501

Singapore
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
http://www.blg.co.uk/contact_us/singapore.aspx
61 Robinson Road
#18-02 Robinson Centre
Singapore 068893
Tel: +65 6578 6100 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +65 6578 6100      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax:+65 6221 1608


Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP is a leading international law firm. Especially renowned for our commercial litigation and dispute resolution, as well as insurance and reinsurance, we provide an extensive range of legal services to clients from many different industries across the world

Our core values include a strong focus on helping our clients and our own people to achieve their ambitions.
Our international focus is reflected in the work that we (and our affiliated undertakings) do all over the world

Our People

David Abbott
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7338 Email: dabbott@blg.co.uk
David Abraham Head Of Costs London + 44 (0)20 7643 8095 Email: dabraham@blg.co.uk
Fernando Albino
Associate Director São Paulo  +55 (11) 3179 2901 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +55 (11) 3179 2901      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email: falbino@blgsaopaulo.com
Tracey Anderson Associate Director London + 44 (0)20 7643 8338 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7643 8338      end_of_the_skype_highlighting tanderson@blg.co.uk
Chander Agnihotri Associate London 44 (0)20 7643 7243 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 7243      end_of_the_skype_highlighting cagnihotri@blg.co.uk
Sue Barham Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7856 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7856      end_of_the_skype_highlighting sbarham@blg.co.uk

Kevin Bitmead
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8574 kbitmead@blg.co.uk
Richard Black Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7444
rblack@blg.co.uk
Andrew Blair Partne London +44 (0)20 7643 8006 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8006      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
ablair@blg.co.uk
Helen Bourne
Partner London+44 (0)20 7643 7036 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7036      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
hbourne@blg.co.uk

Chris Brennan
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7093
cbrennan@blg.co.uk

Clive Brett Partner Oxford London +44 (0)20 7643 8580 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8580      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
cbrett@blg.co.uk
Jason Bright
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8834 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8834      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jbright@blg.co.uk
Charles Brown Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7277
cbrown@blg.co.uk
Stephen Browning
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7709 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7709      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sbrowning@blg.co.uk
Jim Bryant Partner Manchester +44 (0)161 240 2534 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2534      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jbryant@blg.co.uk
Tony Nurse-Marsh
Managing Partner (Oxford) +44 (0)20 7643 8598 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8598      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk\
Fergal Cathie
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7870 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7870      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
fcathie@blg.co.uk

Simon Chumas Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 8490
schumas@blg.co.uk
Sarah Clover Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8544 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8544      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sclover@blg.co.uk
Jeb Clulow 
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7682 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7682      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jclulow@blg.co.uk
Peter Coles Partner Hong Kong +852 2840 2634 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +852 2840 2634      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
pcoles@blg.com.hk

Rupert Connell Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 8100
rconnell@blg.co.uk
James Cooper Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7554 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7554      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jzcooper@blg.co.uk
Simon Cooper Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8486 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8486      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
scooper@blg.co.uk
Adrian Cottam Associate Director +44 (0)20 7643 8128 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8128      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
acottam@blg.co.uk

Nick Dent Partner London
+44 (0)20 7643 7222
ndent@blg.co.uk
James Dadge
Partner Manchester +44 (0)161 240 2552 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2552      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jdadge@blg.co.uk
Tanguy De Schwarz Associate Director
London +44 (0)20 7643 8032
tdeschwarz@blg.co.uk
John Flaherty
Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8593 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8593      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jflaherty@blg.co.uk
Patrick Foss Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7727 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7727      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
pfoss@blg.co.uk

Tom Fyfe 
Partner Hong Kong 852 2840 2695
tfyfe@blg.com.hk

Kevin Finnigan
Partner Manchester 44 (0)161 240 2727
kfinnigan@blg.co.uk
65 6578 6101 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            65 6578 6101      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
mhifzi@blg.com.sg
Andrew Forsyth Associate Director +44 (0)20 7643 8098 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8098      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
aforsyth@blg.co.uk
Simon Gamblin Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 7217 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 7217      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sgamblin@blg.co.uk
Richard Gimblett Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8069 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8069      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
rgimblett@blg.co.uk
John Goodman Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8467 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8467      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
jgoodman@blg.co.uk

Stephen Gorman Partner Manchester
+ 44 (0)161 829 6432
sgorman@blg.co.uk
Simon Gibson Partern Manchester  +44 (0)161 240 2578 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)161 240 2578      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sgibson@blg.co.uk

Stuart Hall Parter London 44 (0)20 7643 8473 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            44 (0)20 7643 8473      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
shall@blg.co.uk

Mert Hifzi Partner London Senior Partner Singapore +65 6578 6101
mhifzi@blg.

Andrew Howell Partner London
  +44 (0)20 7643 8987 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8987      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
ahowell@blg.co.uk
Douglas Howie Partner London +44 (0)20 7643 8484 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8484      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
dhowie@blg.co.uk
Nicholas Hughes Partner London   +44 (0)20 7643 8459 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7643 8459      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
nhughes@blg.co.uk

Stewart Harper Partner London + 44 (0)161 240 2592 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)161 240 2592      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
sharper@blg.co.uk
Ann Hughes Parter Manchester +44  (0)161 240 2606
ahughes@blg.co.uk

Rod Hunt
Partner Mancester 44 (0)161 240 2610
rhunt@blg.co.uk




UK - London
Fishburns
60 Fenchurch Street,
London,
EC3M 4AD
DX 584 London
Tel: +44 (0)20 7280 8888 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8888      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: +44 (0)207280 8899
Click here for the map
UK - Bristol
Fishburns,
Redcliff Quay,
120 Redcliff Street,
Bristol,
BS1 6HU
Tel: +44 (0)117 301 7390 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)117 301 7390      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: +44 (0)117 301 7391
Click here for the map
Ireland - Dublin
Fishburns
5 George's Dock,
IFSC,
Dublin 1,
Ireland
DX Dublin 49
Tel: +353 1790 9400 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +353 1790 9400      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax: +353 1790 9401
Partners
John Bennett
Peter Campion - Chairman
Andrew Davis
Aoife Gaughan
John Groome
Philip Heartfield
Mark Klimt
Robert Lloyd
Antony Marsh - Senior Partner
Simon Mason
Jonathan Moss
Denise O'Connor
Harriet Quiney
Tracy Sell-Peters
Peter Sewell
Ian Welland
Angus Wilson
Sheona Wood
Solicitors
Welcome to our list of solicitors, please select contact:
Charlotte Adol
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8925 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8925      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: adol@fishburnslaw.com
Nicola Barnett - Barrister
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8934 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8934      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: barnett@fishburnslaw.com
Elizabeth Bell
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8943 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8943      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: bell@fishburnslaw.com
Joanna Bower
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8979 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8979      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: bower@fishburnslaw.com
Jonathan Brown
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7220 5218 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7220 5218      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: brown@fishburnslaw.com
Dominic Burke
Direct Line: +00 353 1 790 9423 Email Address: burke@fishburnslaw.ie
Dominic Collier
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8941 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8941      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: collier@fishburnslaw.com
Pierre Dagonnot
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8834 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8834      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: dagonnot@fishburnslaw.com
Noel Devins
Direct Line: + 00 353 1790 9406 Email Address: devins@fishburnslaw.ie
Sara-Jane Eaton
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8827 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8827      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: eaton@fishburnslaw.com
Joanna Fookes
Direct Line: + 44 (0)20 7280 8949 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44 (0)20 7280 8949      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: fookes@fishburnslaw.com
Alexandra Goddard
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8820 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8820      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: goddard@fishburnslaw.com
Robert Goodlad
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8829 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8829      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: goodlad@fishburnslaw.com
Dan Hall
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8935 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8935      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: dhall@fishburnslaw.com
Gary Hazelton
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8821 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8821      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: hazelton@fishburnslaw.com
Manuela Heise
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8962 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8962      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: heise@fishburnslaw.com
Jennifer Hutchinson
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8924 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8924      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: hutchinson@fishburnslaw.com
Jonathan Hyde
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8927 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8927      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: hyde@fishburnslaw.com
Simon Jackson
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8944 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8944      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: jacksons@fishburnslaw.com
Helen Jenkins
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8816 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8816      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: jenkins@fishburnslaw.com
Sophia Kashmiri
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8823 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8823      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: kashmiri@fishburnslaw.com
Rosemarie Kelly - Legal Assistant
Direct Line: +00 353 1790 9408 Email Address: kelly@fishburnslaw.ie
Carine Kesserwani
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8952 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8952      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: kesserwani@fishburnslaw.com
Robin Lambert
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8879 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8879      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: lambert@fishburnslaw.com
Elinor Lamerton
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8876 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8876      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: lamerton@fishburnslaw.com
Ruth Lane
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7220 5207 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7220 5207      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: lane@fishburnslaw.com
Barry Lewis – Consultant
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8833 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8833      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: lewis@fishburnslaw.com
Marion Mabille - Legal Assistant
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8911 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8911      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mabille@fishburnslaw.com
Sarah Mahoney
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8825 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8825      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mahoney@fishburnslaw.com
Michele Malson
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8872 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8872      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: malson@fishburnslaw.com
Helen Matson
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8870 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8870      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: matson@fishburnslaw.com
Lidia McCarthy
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8968 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8968      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mccarthy@fishburnslaw.com
Hazel McElwain
Direct Line: +353 1 790 9424 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +353 1 790 9424      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mcelwain@fishburnslaw.ie
Damian McKinnon
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8877 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8877      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mckinnon@fishburnslaw.com
Helen McLean
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8871 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8871      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: mclean@fishburnslaw.com
Keira-Eva Mooney
Direct Line: +00 353 1790 9415 Email Address: mooney@fishburnslaw.ie
Ravi Nayer
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8981 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8981      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: nayer@fishburnslaw.com
Matthew Olorenshaw
Direct Line: +44 (0) 20 7220 5210 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 20 7220 5210      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: olorenshaw@fishburnslaw.com
Caroline Omare
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8957 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8957      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: omare@fishburnslaw.com
Joanne O'Sullivan
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8980 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8980      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: o'sullivan@fishburnslaw.com
Eileen Pathiraja
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8878 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8878      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: pathiraja@fishburnslaw.com
Clare Reed
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8938 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8938      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: reed@fishburnslaw.com
Kiley Rogers
Direct Line: +44(0)20 7280 8815 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44(0)20 7280 8815      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: krogers@fishburnslaw.com
Steve Rogers
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8828 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8828      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: rogers@fishburnslaw.com
Alexander Rozycki - Barrister
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8819 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8819      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: rozycki@fishburnslaw.com
Sinéad Ryan
Direct Line: +00 353 1 790 9418 Email Address: ryan@fishburnslaw.ie
Mirjam Schorr
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8831 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8831      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: schorr@fishburnslaw.com
Richard Senior - Barrister
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8814 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8814      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: senior@fishburnslaw.com
Tim Sheldon
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8830 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8830      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: Sheldon@fishburnslaw.com
Kasia Stavrou
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8917 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8917      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: stavrou@fishburnslaw.com
Michelle Thomas - Legal Assistant
Direct Line: +44 (0)117 301 7396 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)117 301 7396      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: thomas@fishburnslaw.com
Annemarie Topliss - Legal Assistant
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8824 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8824      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: topliss@fishburnslaw.com
Donal Twomey
Direct Line: +00 353 1790 9414 Email Address: twomey@fishburnslaw.ie
Philippa Varcoe – Professional Support Lawyer
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8848 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8848      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: Varcoe@fishburnslaw.com
Dan Ward - Barrister
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8936 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8936      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: ward@fishburnslaw.com
Natalie Ward Karas
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8940 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8940      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: wardkaras@fishburnslaw.com
Clare Ward-Smith
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8874 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8874      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: ward-smith@fishburnslaw.com
John Wevill
Direct Line: + 44(0)20 7280 8948 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            + 44(0)20 7280 8948      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: wevill@fishburnslaw.com
Jennifer White
Direct Line: +44 (0)117 301 7395 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)117 301 7395      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: white@fishburnslaw.com
Janet Williams
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8822 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8822      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: williams@fishburnslaw.com
Nicola Woodhouse
Direct Line: +44 (0)20 7280 8826 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7280 8826      end_of_the_skype_highlighting Email Address: woodhouse@fishburnslaw.com
Chancery Place, 50 Brown Street, Manchester, M2 2JT
DX 14448 Manchester



http://www.sherforce.net/

Claire Sandbrook
Claire leads the Sherforce team to deliver services which are innovative but remain balanced and fair to the parties involved.
Claire Sandbrook was appointed as a High Court Enforcement Officer by the Lord Chancellor in March 2004. She is the Chief Executive Officer of Shergroup and is also a practicing Solicitor having qualified in 1989.

In her career as a lawyer in which she has made the enforcement of judgments her specialism, Claire has written for some of the leading texts in this area of law including:
The Fourth Edition of Halsbury's Laws of England on the topic of “Sheriffs'
The Fourth Edition of Halsbury's Laws of England on the topic of “Interpleader"
“Execution of a Sheriff's Warrant” – published in 1995 by Barry Rose Publishers and co-authored with Bill Podevin and James Keith, FCA
“Enforcement of a Judgment” (9 th Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxell and co-authored with Duncan Black
“Enforcement of a Judgment (10 th Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxwell
In edition to writing, Claire was appointed to the Lord Chancellor's Advisory Group on Enforcement Service Delivery in 2001, a group which contributed significantly to the reforms in enforcement we are seeing today.

She has aimed to share her knowledge with the credit industry through lecturing for Central Law Training and other training providers so that more practitioners are aware of how to enforce court judgments using the methods available.

Claire is the current Chair of the High Court Enforcement Officers Association and is working with the Ministry of Justice and other stakeholders to promote the Association's stated aimed of “Responsible Enforcement”.

Christopher Badger

Chris has been part of the Sherforce team since December 2001 when he joined as an administration assistant.

Since then he has gained a wide experience of all areas of High Court Enforcement and has built up an impressive portfolio of case histories where he has handled the execution of the Writ in what may be seemed as very complex issues of law.

Having passed the Sheriffs Officers Association Exam in 2003, Chris was appointed an Authorised High Court Enforcement Officer by Senior Master Turner in October 2007.

In 2009 Chris took on the role of Sherforce Operations Manager in which he liaises with Operational Support, Client Services, Debtor Services, Offshore Operations, and Finance Service Teams who make up the service delivery structure of Sherforce.

He frequently attends Court before the Masters of the Queens Bench Division where he deals with Interpleader, Tools of Trade, and Private Sale applications of which can arise during the course of the execution of a Writ.

He is also has a wide knowledge of High Court Enforcement Officer's fees and has dealt with detailed assessment applications at the Supreme Court Costs Office as well as summary assessment applications for fees.

Chris is also Sherforce's Complaints Officer and complaints about Sherforce should be directed to him in the first instance using the Complaints information on this website.

In addition Chris is willing to assist Judgment Creditors on any technical queries regarding the execution of a Writ, including third party claims, interpleader proceedings, fees or any other matter, and can be contacted at  c-badger@shergroup.net.
Sherforce Enforcement Officers 

The named Officer on the Writ is appointed by the Lord Chancellor to carry out enforcement duties. Authorised Officers do go out from time to time to carry out enforcement and remain at all times personally liable for any action taken in their name.

Day to day however, the Authorised Officers, delegate their duties to a team of trained Enforcement Officers who are controlled by Sherforce to carry out the enforcement across England and Wales .

The names of these Officers are set out below: Gary Allen, Sue Allen, Richard Bushnell, Sarah Bosworth, Darren Burgess, George Bright, Mac Ferguson, Michael Hyde, Mark King, David Carvell, Lynda Carvell, John Himpfen, Kevin Thomas, Steve Michell, David Wharton, Kerri Reynolds, David Flowers, Scott Hines, David Sulway, Chris Stokes, Andy Forrester
Claire leads the Sherforce team to deliver services which are innovative but remain balanced and fair to the parties involved.
 
David Asker 

David Asker was appointed as a High Court Enforcement Officer by the Lord Chancellor in March 2004. He is the Chief Technical Officer of Shergroup, having joined the Sheriff's Office in Greater London in 1983. David's career in enforcement has spanned many different types of execution including the recovery of large value Writs of Fi Fa and high profile Writs of Possession. However early on in his career David became involved in the mainframe computer system used to process the work of Sheriff's Officers in London . This interest led David to achieve his Microsoft Network Engineer qualifications and to build and design the Shergroup computer network of which the processing of Sherforce business is a vital part. Built in collaboration with the needs of the user community, the network which David has created sees Sherforce enjoying a global network for both onshore and offshore back office and voice operations.
 This network is the backbone of a modern and well organised enforcement office. As a result of this expertise he has supported Government initiatives for successful enforcement models including:
the successful implementation of the National Information Centre for Enforcement database (referred to as “NICE')
the online DVLA look up system (known as “Shercar”) which is used by other High Court Enforcement Officers, county court enforcement staff, and magistrates' courts fines officers as well as LACEF member
•
The Fourth Edition of Halsbury's Laws of England on the topic of “Sheriffs”
•
The Fourth Edition of Halsbury's Laws of England on the topic of “Interpleader”
•
“Execution of a Sheriff's Warrant” – published in 1995 by Barry Rose Publishers and co-authored with Bill Podevin and James Keith, FCA
•
“Enforcement of a Judgment” (9 th Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxell and co-authored with Duncan Black
•
“Enforcement of a Judgment (10 th Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxwell
•
“Debt Recovery Through the Courts” (1 st Edition) – published by Sweet & Maxwell
In edition to writing, Claire was appointed to the Lord Chancellor's Advisory Group on Enforcement Service Delivery in 2001, a group which contributed significantly to the reforms in enforcement we are seeing today.

She has aimed to share her knowledge with the credit industry through lecturing for Central Law Training and other training providers so that more practitioners are aware of how to enforce court judgments using the methods available.

Claire is the current Chair of the High Court Enforcement Officers Association and is working with the Ministry of Justice and other stakeholders to promote the Association's stated aimed of “Responsible Enforcement”.

Christopher Badger

Chris has been part of the Sherforce team since December 2001 when he joined as an administration assistant.

Since then he has gained a wide experience of all areas of High Court Enforcement and has built up an impressive portfolio of case histories where he has handled the execution of the Writ in what may be seemed as very complex issues of law.

Having passed the Sheriffs Officers Association Exam in 2003, Chris was appointed an Authorised High Court Enforcement Officer by Senior Master Turner in October 2007.

In 2009 Chris took on the role of Sherforce Operations Manager in which he liaises with Operational Support, Client Services, Debtor Services, Offshore Operations, and Finance Service Teams who make up the service delivery structure of Sherforce.

He frequently attends Court before the Masters of the Queens Bench Division where he deals with Interpleader, Tools of Trade, and Private Sale applications of which can arise during the course of the execution of a Writ.

He is also has a wide knowledge of High Court Enforcement Officer's fees and has dealt with detailed assessment applications at the Supreme Court Costs Office as well as summary assessment applications for fees.

Chris is also Sherforce's Complaints Officer and complaints about Sherforce should be directed to him in the first instance using the  Complaints information on this website.

In addition Chris is willing to assist Judgment Creditors on any technical queries regarding the execution of a Writ, including third party claims, interpleader proceedings, fees or any other matter, and can be contacted at  c-badger@shergroup.net.
Sherforce Enforcement Officers 

The named Officer on the Writ is appointed by the Lord Chancellor to carry out enforcement duties. Authorised Officers do go out from time to time to carry out enforcement and remain at all times personally liable for any action taken in their name.

Day to day however, the Authorised Officers, delegate their duties to a team of trained Enforcement Officers who are controlled by Sherforce to carry out the enforcement across England and Wales .

The names of these Officers are set out below: Gary Allen, Sue Allen, Richard Bushnell, Sarah Bosworth, Darren Burgess, George Bright, Mac Ferguson, Michael Hyde, Mark King, David Carvell, Lynda Carvell, John Himpfen, Kevin Thomas, Steve Michell, David Wharton, Kerri Reynolds, David Flowers, Scott Hines, David Sulway, Chris Stokes, Andy Forrester
Claire leads the Sherforce team to deliver services which are innovative but remain balanced and fair to the parties involved.
David Asker 

David Asker was appointed as a High Court Enforcement Officer by the Lord Chancellor in March 2004. He is the Chief Technical Officer of Shergroup, having joined the Sheriff's Office in Greater London in 1983. David's career in enforcement has spanned many different types of execution including the recovery of large value Writs of Fi Fa and high profile Writs of Possession. However early on in his career David became involved in the mainframe computer system used to process the work of Sheriff's Officers in London . This interest led David to achieve his Microsoft Network Engineer qualifications and to build and design the Shergroup computer network of which the processing of Sherforce business is a vital part. Built in collaboration with the needs of the user community, the network which David has created sees Sherforce enjoying a global network for both onshore and offshore back office and voice operations.
 This network is the backbone of a modern and well organised enforcement office. As a result of this expertise he has supported Government initiatives for successful enforcement models including:
the successful implementation of the National Information Centre for Enforcement database (referred to as “NICE')
the online DVLA look up system (known as “Shercar”) which is used by other High Court Enforcement Officers, county court enforcement staff, and Subject:
Pritchard and others v. Ingram Winter Green and others
From:
Tony Nurse-Marsh <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>
(Add as Preferred Sender)
 
Date:Wed, Mar 23, 2011 7:18 amTo:"'admin@jamison.biz'" <admin@jamison.biz>, "sallylpalmer@gmail.com" <sallylpalmer@gmail.com>, "dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk" <dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk>, "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Jonathan Kandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, Mendy <aeb@bnilaw.co.uk>, N Iwanier <ni@bnilaw.co.uk>, "'david.rosen@inlnews.com'" <david.rosen@inlnews.com>
 
Dear Sirs ,
 
 Please note that we have been instructed to act for Ingram Winter Green in the above matter. Please would all parties correspond with us and not Ingram Winter Green in relation to all aspects of this matter.
 
Please would Jamison and Associates / Sally  Palmer confirm that they have relayed this message to all the Claimants  and any other relevant parties .
 
Please would Jamison and Associates / Ms Palmer and Mr Rosen confirm who is acting for the Claimants in the above action in order that we can correspond with the appropriate legal representative.
 
Yours faithfully ,
 
Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP
Tony Nurse-Marsh, Partner
Direct Telephone: +44 207 643 8598 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 207 643 8598      end_of_the_skype_highlighting,
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9151, Mobile: +44 7920 231321 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 7920 231321      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Email: tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk
************************************************************************
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
Beaufort House, 15 St. Botolph Street, London EC3A 7NJ.
Telephone : +44 (0)20 7247 2277 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0)20 7247 2277      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Fax : +44 (0)20 7643 8500
Web Site : http://www.blg.co.uk
VAT Number: 945619101
 
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC325641. It is an international law firm regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The term partner is used to refer to a member of Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP or an employee or consultant of Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP is open to inspection at the registered office, Beaufort House, 15 St Botolph Street, EC3A 7NJ.
 
BLG Claims LLP is a limited liability partnership, registered in England and Wales with registered number OC344148. BLG Claims LLP is affiliated to Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP. It is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Partners marked * are members of BLG Claims LLP or employees or consultants of BLG Claims LLP with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of members is open to inspection at the registered office, Beaufort House, 15 St Botolph Street, London, EC3A 7NJ.
magistrates' courts fines officers as well as LACEF member
To:"'admin@jamison.biz'" <admin@jamison.biz>, "sallylpalmer@gmail.com" <sallylpalmer@gmail.com>, "dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk" <dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk>, "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, Jonathan Kandler <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, Mendy <aeb@bnilaw.co.uk>, N Iwanier <ni@bnilaw.co.uk>, "'david.rosen@inlnews.com'" <david.rosen@inlnews.com>
Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, 1-2 Temple Fortune Parade, Bridge Lane, London NW11 0QN
Tel:+44 (20) 8458 5656 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (20) 8458 5656      end_of_the_skype_highlighting, Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065, DX: 92006 Temple Fortune, www.bnilaw.co.uk
clerks@radcliffechambers.com, "'N Iwanier'" ni@bnilaw.co.uk CC: admin@jamison.biz, david.rosen@inlnews.com
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedfprd House, 21A John Street, London WC1N2BL Tel: 020 7845 7400 Fax: 020 78457401 www.ing.co.uk
Partners: ND Green, DJ Ingram, CDWinter, PS Sheeter, MA Compion, DP Daws, SE Woolf, DV Popal, MJ Pangbourne, D Ginsbury Consuktants: G Paletz and MA Gordon
 
INL News Legal and Investigation Team
David.Rosen@inlnews.com, admin@inlnews.com
Jamison and Associates: Investigative Accountants and Attorneys
admin@jamison.biz www.jamison.biz Tel: +44 (0) 740 724 7764 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 740 724 7764      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Urgent Attention Duty Inspector Rushworth
Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479
Met Police, Sutton Police Station London Tel:  0208 7731212 Fax:  0208 649 0790
1st April 2011
Re: Illegal and/or wrongful  removal and arrest of Janice Vivienne Pritchard from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW and the wrongful and/or illegal  threat to arrest Robert Carter form his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW, and wrongfully acting as a private security firm for Bude Nathan Iwanier solicitors, Nathan Teitelbaun and fine Investments Limited in clear breach of their duties as London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479, under instructions from Duty Inspector Rushworth of the Sutton Police Station. Such actions being civilly actionable in the courts under the common law tort Male-fiance of the public officer as well as being civil and/or criminal offences such as conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, wrongful and illegal arrest, damages to property and person. There is no doubt that the above names police officers will lose their jobs, likely criminal charges and themselves and the Met Police sued for damages, along with the Media exposing world wide the illegal, corrupt and wrongful actions committed and/or authorized by London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253, Constable Turley Met number ZT 479 and Duty Inspector Rushworth
Dear Sirs and Madame
Further to our earlier letter as attached, we inform you that the London Met Police will be help personally responsible for any items and/or goods, papers, money jewelry, videos, CDs, computer equipment, stereo equipment and/or any other items at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW that we at the premises when your selves on behalf of the London Met Police helped criminals break in to the house and wrongfully stopped the rightful people who had been living in the house stay and protect their belongings. The facts, background and seriousness of the situation is set out in the attached letter that was faxed to you earlier tonight.
Please note unless this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid who are the rightful occupants of the house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW by Monday at 4pm, then all possible civil and criminal action will be taken out along with a complaint to the head of the Met Police and the Mayor of London and other senior politicians as well as all media outlets around the world
We look forward to an urgent and sensible response.
Yours sincerely
 
INL News Legal and Investigations Group
 
INL News Legal and Investigation Team
David.Rosen@inlnews.com, admin@inlnews.com
Jamison and Associates: Investigative Accountants and Attorneys
admin@jamison.biz www.jamison.biz Tel: +44 (0) 740 724 7764
Urgent AttentionDuty Inspector Neil Tandy and Duty Inspector Rushworth
Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479
Met Police, Sutton Police Station London Tel:  0208 7731212 Fax:  0208 649 0790
Aaron Emanuel Bude (Mendy) Founding Partner of Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors
 
Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade, Bridge Lane, London NW11 0QN

 
Tel:+44 (20) 8458 5656Fax: +44 (20) 8458 5065 DX: 92006 Temple Fortune
www.bnilaw.co.uk
Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP and Tony Nurse-Marsh
Partner Direct Telephone:             +44 207 643 8598      
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9151 Mobile:             +44 7920 231321       Email: tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Bedford House, 21A john Street London WC1N 2BF Tel: 020 7845 7400 Fax: 020 7845 7401
Partners: ND Green, DJ Ingram, CD Winter, PS Sheeter, MA Compton, DV Popat, DJ Ginsbury, EJ Bartie, BA Horak, Consultants: M.A. Gordon, G Paletz
1st April 2011
Re: Illegal and/or wrongful  removal and arrest of Janice Vivienne Pritchard from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW and the wrongful and/or illegal  threat to arrest Robert Carter form his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW, and wrongfully acting as a private security firm for Bude Nathan Iwanier solicitors, Nathan Teitelbaun and fine Investments Limited in clear breach of their duties as London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479, under instructions from Duty Inspector Rushworth and Duty Inspector Neil Tandyof the Sutton Police Station. Such actions being civilly actionable in the courts under the common law tort Male-fiance of the public officer as well as being civil and/or criminal offences such as conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, wrongful and illegal arrest, damages to property and person. There is no doubt that the above names police officers will lose their jobs, likely criminal charges and themselves and the Met Police sued for damages, along with the Media exposing world wide the illegal, corrupt and wrongful actions committed and/or authorized by London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253, Constable Turley Met number ZT 479 and Duty Inspector Rushworth and Duty Inspector Neil Tanday
Dear Sirs and Madame
Further to our earlier letter as attached, we inform you that the London Met Police will be help personally responsible for any items and/or goods, papers, money jewelry, videos, CDs, computer equipment, stereo equipment and/or any other items at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW that we at the premises when your selves on behalf of the London Met Police helped criminals break in to the house and wrongfully stopped the rightful people who had been living in the house stay and protect their belongings. The facts, background and seriousness of the situation is set out in the attached letter that was faxed to you earlier tonight.
 
Please note unless this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid who are the rightful occupants of the house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW by Monday at 4pm, then all possible civil and criminal action will be taken out along with a complaint to the head of the Met Police and the Mayor of London and other senior politicians as well as all media outlets around the world
We again remind you all what we said in your earlier letter faxed yesterday>
If a sensible response is not received, rest assured this letter and previous letters will be published on the wortld internet in many international news websites very soon. Once thisd is done there simply is no turning back. Wew are giving yourselves and the London Met Police this once only opportunity to amend the serious wrongs that have been done today as set out in our previous letters dated the 1st April, 2011. If this warning is not acted upon in a sensible manner, you can not say you all have not been warned and please understand that you will then deserve to be exposed in the world media and be prosecuted with the full weight of all the possible civil and criminal laws available. If things are immediately rectified in a sensible manner we can then look at considering  that yourselves and the London Met Police have made a tragic innocent error and have been hoodwinked by the representatives of solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Fineland Investments, Solicitors Ingram Winter Green, Solicitor Tony Nurse-Marsh, Solicitors Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP who all work Nathan Tietelbaun who is a  well known criminal and money laundering involved in a massive International Illegal drug operation who uses these names solicitors to money launder hundreds of millions of pounds each year of black illegal money through their trust accounts and through local council trust  accounts in a scam to defraud life tenants of council flats of their life tenancies.
Representatives of solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Fineland Investments, Solicitors Ingram Winter Green, Solicitor Tony Nurse-Marsh, Solicitors Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP who all work Nathan Tietelbaun have used the London Met Police Force and the authority that goes with London Met Police badges in such a wrongful manner yesterday the 1st April 2011 and besides the fact that what was done was illegal, corrupt and/or wrongful, it was also immoral and inhuman to the highest level. All those involved should hang your head in absolute shame over what you have all being involved with doing and/or ordering to be done and/ot allowed to be done and/or covering up from be rectified and exposed, Iy you all do not immediately
(a)  Apologize to Janice Vivienne Pritchard
(b)  Apologize to Robert Carter
(c)  Release Janice  Pritchard from your custody
(d)  Help and allow Robert Carter to return to his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW. in a peaceful manner with police protection
(e)  Help and allow Janice  Pritchard to return to her home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW.in a peaceful manner with police protection
 
Legal action will commence against yourselves and the London Met Police for damages in excess of 10 million plus other civil and criminal complaints will to made against you to have you all charges with criminal and/civil offences and reports filed to encourage the Met Police to remove you all from your duties to act as police officers so you can not do any more damage to ordinary people
We have already faxed to various fax number being  Fax: 0208 649 0790 and Fax: 0208 649 3712 some 150 pages that have been filed with the High Court of Justice Chancery Division in support of a 100 million pound damages claim against yourselves. As a result of what the London Met Police have done yesterday and continuing today we are about to have the London Met Police, Inspector Neil Tandy and Duty Inspector Rushworth, Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479 joined to High Court of Justice Action HC11C00C580 as defendants for being involved with assault and threatening behavior  on Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter and a conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, conceiling evidence, helping in a robbery, stand over tactics, and the list goes on and on. If the matter is not resolved my Sunday night the met police and your selves as  individual officers will be joined to this court High Court Action.
We have reported for Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid the theft of elect4ricity, water and gas bu unknown persons who illegally broke into the house at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton CR0 4PW on the 1st April, 2011, when the life tenant Robert Carter and new owner of the property John Carew-Reid were away from the property and manhandled and assaulted their caretaker Janice Pritchard, bodily through her out the door and changed the locks and brought a van full of unknown Romanian heavies who say they do not speak English to move into the house. These men threatened Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter and later on re-threatened solicitor Sally Palmer and Robert carter with a shovel with violence that was in the house belonging to Robert Carter with When the police were called by Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid and the INL News Groups investigators the police said it was a civil matter, but 10 minutes later brought a number of policed over to assault Janice Pritchard and wrongfully arrest her without any due cause and wrongfully threatened Robert Carter with arrest if he did not walk away formt he drive way and leave the property altogether.
These people in the house are stealing electricity water and gas form Janice Pritchard and the police and letting them get away with this crime which was reported 12 hours ago. The police have to go and arrest all the people in the house  at 1 Garratt Close Beddington Surrey Sutton CR0 4PW for this crime their names are known so the police have to demand all their names and have their all arrested immediately for steal electricity and also have their bosses charged for conspiracy to steal electricity, gas and water from Janice Pritchard, Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid. These criminals in the house  have been instructed b the legal firms of Bude Nathan and Iwanier, Ingram Winter Green, and Barlow Lyde and Gilbert LLP and Tony Nurse-Marsh as well as Fineland Investments Limited and Nathan Tielelbaun. If the police d not go around and immediately arrest them then the police are continuing to aide and abet a criminal offence and the police themselves refusing to carry out their duties ot arrest these people will have to be also charged and also joined to the above mentioned high Court Action for damages.
We look forward to an urgent and sensible response.
Yours sincerely
 
INL News Legal and Investigations Group
 
 
INL News Legal and Investigation Team
David.Rosen@inlnews.com, admin@inlnews.com
Jamison and Associates: Investigative Accountants and Attorneys
admin@jamison.biz www.jamison.biz Tel: +44 (0) 740 724 7764 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 740 724 7764      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Urgent Attention
Duty Inspector Rushworth
Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479
Met Police, Sutton Police Station London
Tel:  0208 7731212 Fax:  0208 649 0790
 
Re: Illegal and/or wrongful  removal and arrest of Janice Vivienne Pritchard from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW and the wrongful and/or illegal  threat to arrest Robert Carter form his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CRO 4PW, and wrongfully acting as a private security firm for Bude Nathan Iwanier solicitors, Nathan Teitelbaun and fine Investments Limited in clear breach of their duties as London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479, under instructions from Duty Inspector Rushworth of the Sutton Police Station. Such actions being civilly actionable in the courts under the common law tort Male-fiance of the public officer as well as being civil and/or criminal offences such as conspiracy to pervert the course of justice, wrongful and illegal arrest, damages to property and person. There is no doubt that the above names police officers will lose their jobs, likely criminal charges and themselves and the Met Police sued for damages, along with the Media exposing world wide the illegal, corrupt and wrongful actions committed and/or authorized by London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253, Constable Turley Met number ZT 479 and Duty Inspector Rushworth
 
Dear Sirs and Madame
Please note that yourselves have acted in a very wrongful, corrupt and/or wrongful way in arresting Janice Pritchard from her home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW.
Please note that yourselves have acted in a very wrongful, corrupt and/or wrongful way in threatening to arrest Janice  Pritchard from his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW and forcing him to leave the home he has been living for over 16 years under threat of arrest if he did not leave the property.
You have used you London Met Police Badges and authority in such a wrongful way to day and besides being illegal, corrupt, and/or wrongful, it was simply immoral and inhuman to the highest level and you all should hang your head in shame over what you have done. If you do not immediately
(f)      Apologize to Janice Vivienne Pritchard
(g)     Apologize to Robert Carter
(h)     Release Janice  Pritchard from your custody
(i)       Help and allow Robert Carter to return to his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW. in a peaceful manner with police protection
(j)       Help and allow Janice  Pritchard to return to her home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW.in a peaceful manner with police protection
 
Legal action will commence against yourselves and the London Met Police for damages in excess of 10 million plus other civil and criminal complaints will to made against you to have you all charges with criminal and/civil offences and reports filed to encourage the Met Police to remove you all from your duties ot act as police officers so you can not do any more damage to ordinary people
 
We hereby attach copies of relevant papers  that have been filed with the High Court if Justice Chancery Division and the HM Tiles office to show that solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier who represent Fineland Investments and Natham Tietelbaun are acting in a wrongful and/or illegal way by employer heavies  to forcably removing Janice Vivienne Pritchard from her home and ASSAULTING HER to day at  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW and acted in a wrongful and/or illegal way by employer heavies  to forcably removing Robert Carter from his home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW. They have lied ot the police in saying Fineland Investments is the registered owner of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW.  The Met Police, including as London Met Police Officers by Constables Owen Met Number ZT253 and Constable Turley Met number ZT 479have not acted in a proper and fit manner in refusing to speak on the phone when they were at the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW to find out the truth and facts of the matter under instructions from duty Inspector Rushworth. The situation is clear. Inspector  Rushworth was rung up by power people and powerful connections associated with the powerful Jewish Solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, to instruct junior constables who had no idea of the real legal situation ot assist a private security firm and solicitors and corrupt greedy and powerful multi-millionaire property developers who are all involved with money laundering of millions of pounds of drug and other illegal money in trying to buy council flats from councils, abusing the rights of life tenants and defrauding them such as Janice Vivienne Pritchard and Robert Carter.
The facts of this case is that:
1.       Solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier and their representatives lied and misrepresented the truth and with held material facts to the London  Met Police today in order to get the met Police to interfere with a civil matter in circumstances that met Police undertook a few minutes earlier not to get involved as it was in their opinion a civil matter. Some the material false facts told to the Met Police and facts that were with held form the Met Police today are:
(a)     They falsely told the met Police the property at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW was registered in the name of their client Fineland Investments Pty Ltd, when they know full well that the property is registered in the name of Janice Pritchard and that a transfer has been lodge with the HM Land Registry sign ed by Janice Pritchard transferring the property to John Carew-Reid pursuant to an agreement dated 4th June 2004. This transfer has been lodged with the HM Land registry and has priority to any other lodgment against the title deed and there is no reason why the transfer to John Carew-Reid will not completed in due cause,
(b)     Robert Carter has been living at the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW for over 16 years and as such has tenancy rights and can not be forceably removed by anyone without a court order against him as he is a long lasting 16 year tenancy, he is the beneficial owner of the property pursuant to a trust letter signed by John Carew-Reid and pursuant to his right under the original 16 year tenancy that Janice Pritchard and Robert Carter had with the Sutton Council which gives them both life tenancies of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW
(c)     There is a court application due to be heard on the 7th April 2011 in the High Court of Justice- Chancery Division set aside the orders made by Action Deputy Judge Alison Foster on the grounds that the orders were obtained by fraudulent misrepresentation, misleading facts and information provided to the court and withholding of material facts form the court. The attempt to forcibly remove Robert Carter and Janice Pritchard from their home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW with wrongful  and/or illegal and immoral help form the London Met Police force has been an attempt to pervert to course of justice, a civil and/or criminal physical and psychological assault and a most shameful act by agents of solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Fineland Investments Limited, and the London Met Police.
(d)     Janice Pritchard’s right to peaceful possession of the property known as 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW results form a number of angles which(i) include the fact that John Carew-Reid who is the rightful registered owner of the property have lodged a legal and binding transfer of the property to his name with the Land Registry, has appointed both Janice Pritchard and Robert carter as permanent caretakers of the property on his behalf as the rightful owner of the property (ii) Janice Prichard has been a tenant and in possession of the property for over 16 years and has the right to remain as such, whether under her  inherent rights and/or under the rights given to her by John Carew-Reid as caretaker of the property for him and Robert Carter’s behalf So even if one wants to support the view that the wrongful, fraudulent and illegal court order of the 31st January 2011 has given some purported right to have Janice Pritchard removed from the property, she can remain under her right as appointed caretaker of the property as appointed by Robert Carter and John Carew-ReId
(e)     They all have had a copy of the statement of truths lodged with the courts  by Robert Carter and John Carew-Reid as attached to this letter and all know what they have done today is civilly and/or criminanly actionable. The sad part about the matter is that the Met Police have decided to take the law into their own hands and help them with their civil and criminal wrongs committed today. The police know they have done wrong and can be sued and those involved are likely to be removed from the Met Police Force with their careers in a legal and public mess with the whole scandal being exposed all over the world media to warn others that that this sort of behavior will not be tolerated.
 
Solicitor Sally Palmer will soon be at the Sutton Police Station to organize with the met Police to immediately release Janice Pritchard form custody with no charge and help with a police escort to be allowed to peacefully move back into their home at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey, Sutton, CR0 4PW. If the above requested actions are not taken by the London Met Police then the yourselves and the London Met Police will face the full extent of the civil and criminal law against them As well as the the greatest media publicity possible to make it known to the public world wide what is going inside the Met Police and what corrupt, wrongful, immoral and/or inhumane and illegal actions London Met Officers are prepared to be involved with. With all the wrongs going on in the world there is no need for yourselves to shame the London met Police with this sort of behavior.
 
Please email back you immediate response to
admin@jamison.biz and a CC: david.rosen@inlnews.com
If a sensible response is not receive rest assured this letter will be publish on the world internet in many news websites very soon. Once this is done there simply is no turning back. We are giving yourselves and the London Met Police this once only opportunity to amend the serious wrongs that have been done today as set out above, if this warning is not acted on in a sensible manner, you cab not say you all have not been warned and please understand that you deserve to be exposed in the world media and be prosecuted with the full weight of the all possible civil and criminal laws available
If things are rectified in a sensible manner we can accept that yourselves and the London Met Police have made a tragic innocent error and have been hoodwinked by the representatives of solicitors Bude Nathan Iwanier, Fineland Investments Limited and multi millionaire property investor Nathan Tietebaun
We look forward to an urgent and sensible response.
 
Yours sincerely
 
INL News Legal and Investigations Group
 


 
Request for London High Court of JusticeJustice Paul Morgan 
to stand down from hearing  HC11C00580 and HC06C02639
 
Re: HC11C00580 
Royal Courts of Justice, Chancery Division
JV Pritchard and Ors v Nathan Tietelbaum and Ors
 
and HC06C02639
Fineland Investments Limited v JV Pritchard 
 
Hearing set for 4th July, 2011 to attempt to strike out claim in HC11C00580 and for civil restraint orders and for criminal contempt orders against various solicitors and barristers
Hearing to be heard by Justice Paul Morgan by
order of Chancellor of the Royal Courts of Justice 
 
 
Urgent Attention:
Justice Paul Morgan Care of His Clerk, Heather Watson
Tel: +44 (0) 207 947 6419 Fax: +44 (0) 207 947 6062
Royal Courts of Justice, Chancery Division
 and to:
The Chancellor of the Royal Courts of Justice
care of his Clerk Suzanne Gifford
"Gifford, Suzanne" <suzanne.gifford@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>, 
Clerk to the Chancellor of the Royal Courts of Justice,
 
London Solicitor -Adrian Wood
CC: London Solicitor -Adrian Wood
Email: "WOOD Adrian" <adrian.wood@pinsentmasons.com>, 
 
CC: Fishburn Law: "Simon Jackson" <jacksons@fishburnslaw.com>, 
      "Helen Jenkins" <Jenkins@fishburnslaw.com>, 
       "Noel Devins" <devins@fishburnslaw.ie>, 
       "Elizabeth Bell" <Bell@fishburnslaw.com>, 
       "Helen Matson" <Matson@fishburnslaw.com>,
        "Helen McLean" <McLean@fishburnslaw.com>, 
       "Natalie Ward Karas" <wardkaras@fishburnslaw.com>, 
        "Robin Lambert" <Lambert@fishburnslaw.com>, 
       "Noel Devins" <devins@fishburnslaw.ie>,
        "Nicola Barnett" <Barnett@fishburnslaw.com>, 
       "Ravi Nayer" <Nayer@fishburnslaw.com>, 
       "Clare Ward-Smith" <Ward-Smith@fishburnslaw.com>, 
        "Sinead Ryan" <ryan@fishburnslaw.ie>, 
 
      Kennedys-Law: "Mooney, Eamon" <E.Mooney@kennedys-law.com>, 
     "Hibbert,Nick" <N.Hibbert@kennedys-law.com>, 
 
      Hailsham Chambers:"Francis Bacon" <francis.bacon@hailshamchambers.com>, 
      <clerks@hailshamchambers.com>, 
      Radcliffe Chambers: "Marie-Claire Bleasdale" <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>, 
      "William Moffett (Radcliffe Chambers - Chambers)" <clerks@radcliffechambers.com>, 
     
       Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors : "Meny Bude" <aeb@bni.co.uk>, 
       "Vikki Courtney" <VCourtney@blg.co.uk>, 
      <dz@bni.com.uk>, "JKandler" <jbk@bnilaw.co.uk>, 
      "Julia" <julia@bnilaw.co.uk>, 
       "N Iwanier" <ni@bni.co.uk>, 
       <info@bnilaw.co.uk>, <vv@bni.co.uk>, 
       
     39 Essex Chambers:
    <ben.sunborg@39essex.com>, 
     <david.barnes@39essex.com>, 
     <graham.smith@39essex.com>, 
     <niki.merison@39essex.com>,
     <owen.lawrence@39essex.com>, 
     <peter.cambell@39essex.com>, 
 
     Denniss Matthews Solicitors: dm@denniss-mathews.co.uk,
 
    Barlow Lyde Gilbert LLP:
   "David Moon" <DMoon@blg.co.uk>, 
   "Sophie Ruffles" <SRuffles@blg.co.uk>, 
   "Tony Nurse-Marsh" <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>, 
    "Gaby Kaiser" <gkaiser@blg.co.uk>,
 
 
   Doughty Street Chambers: <t.akers-douglas@doughtystreet.co.uk>, 
   <g.robertson@doughtystreet.co.uk>, 
    
   INL News Group: <david.rosen@inlnews.com>,  <admin@inlnews.com>, 
 
  Jamison and Associates: admin@jamison.biz, 
 
  Ingram Winter Green Solicitors: geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk, <info@iwg.co.uk>,  
  
 
  Dear Lord Chancellor of the High Courts of Justice, The Stand London
The claimants in HC11C00580 and the Defendant on HC06C02639  were surprised in some ways, and not surprised in other ways, that you have decided to order the Justice Paul Morgan (Jewish Zionist Family-Morgan Stanley), who is of the famous Morgan Family connected to the well known most powerful families in the world who the all powerful Rothchilds Family made into multi trillionaires in return for their loyalty and silent partnership in most of the worlds most profit commodities, money, transport, energy, finance etc. (Ambani, Astor, Baker, Baring, British Royal Family, Brenninkmeijer, Bush, Bundy, Cheney, Collins, Cowles-Hammett, Disney, DuPont, Field, Ford, Freeman, Fugger, Gates, Goldman, House of Windsor (Saxe-Coburg Gotha/Hanover), House of Rothschild, House of Orange, Kennedy, Kellogg, Krupp, Li (Chinese), Oldyoti. Onassis, Mars, Mittal, Medici, Morgan, Reynolds, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Romanov, Russell, Sachs, Saud, Sawiris, van Duyn, Windsor, Koch, Merovingian (European Royal Families), Field ,Whitney, Wrigley, Vanderbilt and Yusupov The reality is that people on powerful positions such as politicians, judges etc are more scared of the people in the shadows that can harm them and/or their families in many different ways, than any public criticism  of the way their carry out their appointed duties. 
There is no doubt that the High Court of Justice in London needs more judges to ease the work load and that Justice Paul Morgan has the knowledge and experience in the law to be able to handle the job. However a High Court Judge has to not only know the law, , but also be a person whom the public can trust completely to make fair, honourable and independent judgments.
" Power should not go uncontrolled, and must be responsible, and responsive, to the community. These considerations are applicable to the judiciary, as an institution, and to judges as individuals, just as they are to other areas of government activity.... The objective of accountability is that, provided it takes the appropriate form, it should promote good decision making. The public are also interested in the integrity of the decision making process. The method by which decisions  are made must be, and seen to be, just. The decision maker must be impartial, and the decision making process must be transparent and fair. This is because acceptability of the judicial decision making is essential tot he stability of the community... the peace and willingness to abide by them. In short, in pragmatic terms, the ends to be served by accountability in judicial decision making concern the quality of individual decisions, and the community acceptance of the outcome of the judicial process..democracy demands that all forms of Government Institutions are ....responsible and ultimately answerable to the citizens....if judges and magistrates think that the law of contempt id there to protect themselves from criticism...then they are ignorant of the law..." Quote form the former Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia ( similar in legal standing to the House of Lords or the Privy Council in the United Kingdom) The Honourable Murray Gleeson Ac Judicial Review (1995) 2 TJR Page 117 to 140. 
Based on his pasty track record in handling HC11C00580 and HC06C02639, it does not appear that Justice Paul Morgan is the sort of person the community as a whole would trust to make a fair, independent and honourable judgement - the reputation he has built up in these cases is one that he is prepared to feather his own nest and his friends, associates and/or paymasters etc., to protect contempt of court, fraud, false statements, withholding of material information and the presenting of misleading information and misleading legals arguments by barristers and solicitors involved in preparing and/or presenting legal arguments and alleged facts in HC11C00580 and HC06C02639.
 My self and others have over the last few months have watched recorded and analysed many courts he has been involved wit in particular hearings involving HC11C00580 and Hc06C02639. In many instances Justice Paul Morgan's integrity appears to be severely lacking and appears to have made judicial rulings for personal reasons in an unfair and wrongfully manner, without fair analysis of the facts and law involved in the matters he was been ruling on. In his rulings, Justice Paul Morgan does seem to have searched and/or interested in the truth, which is his job. The general opinion of those watching his handling of these cases, Justice Paul Morgan appears to to have just ruled for the Claimants in HC11C00580 and for the Plaintiff in HC06C02639 in every hearing regarding of the truth and or the law in the particular matter, just to help the powerful and well connected Jewish Lawyers and attorneys and clients involved (no offense to the fact they are all Jewish, it is just a fact that they all seem to be of the same faith and there is no doubt in the world that the average citizen would believe that they have very powerful connections and tentacles and would tent to use those powerful connections to get themselves out of a tight legal corner they are now facing with the reputations and finances in potential ruins if they do not have HC11C00580 struck out on the 4th June, 2011 and the orders made by Acting Deputy Judge Alison Forster QC on the 31st January, 2011 in HC06C02639 not set aside on the 8th November, 2011 and civil restraint orders against the claimants in HC11C00580 granted to stop any further applications to expose and/or stop  their wrongful legal tactics. The evidence is clear that one has never seen such a large group of well connected and powerful solicitors and barristers make such a desperate effort and pull what every strings and favours needed behind the scenes to stop any possible allegations of wrongdoing and to stop an open and fair trial being held where they all have to end up on the witness stand and where there is full and open discovery and interlocutory processes and full cross examination of witnesses, their witness statements and documents where there are allegations of a serious, well planned and carried out, civil and/or criminal conspiracy to defraud the claimants in HC11C00580 and the defendant in HC06C02639 which is supported by unending evidence and information. The conspiracy to defraud involving the defendants in HC11C00580 started in July 2004 and is still continuing and much of the evidence supporting the cause of action of conspiracy to defraud coming to light with the transcripts of the hearing on the 11th and 12th October, 2010 in HC06C02639 were finally made available as a result of a fair judge the Honourable Justice Briggs ordering these transcripts to be made available to the Defendant in HC06C02639 ordering them after being absolutely shocked to see that High Court of Justice Staff and/or agents lost an application made by the Defendant (Ms JV Pritchard)  in HC06C002639 to the High Court of Justice which as referred by listings to Acting Deputy Judge Alison Forster QC. 
Then the powerful connections of the barristers and solicitors in HC11C00580 and HC06C02639  started to run sacred that an honest and fair judge of The Honourable Justice Briggs level of law and integrity may end up hearing the hearing for HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 and made further orders that all material information, transcripts, documents, bundals of documents, legal arguments etc that have been filed since the original action of HC06C02639 was issued and full discovery of  all other material documents, transcripts etc; so they made sure this would not happen by calling in a big favour of the Lord Chancellor of the High Court of Justice  to make sure a judge friendly to them such as Justice Paul Morgan, would be ordered to hear all the future hearings for HC11C00580 and HC06C02639. That way there was an excellent chance of always obtaining the orders they require each time regardless of the fair and honourable way of handing the hearing based on looking at all the evidence and allegations, documents and all the law that is relevant, Justice Paul Morgan would appear to the average citizen, a judge that is prepared to make what ever orders requested by the barristers and solicitors involved for the defendants in HC11C00580 and the plaintiff in HC06C02639 regardless of the abuse of power and wrongful legal tactics are used to obtain such orders and/or to grant such orders. As a judge  his job is to search for the truth, not to just accept what a barrister says at the bar table regardless of the conflicting evidence available to him, and ignore all the known legal principles material to the matter, just to help his legal friends out of a legal jam.
 
The skeleton arguments presented to the court by barristers for the Defendants in HC11C00580 have stated that Justice Paul Morgan was accused of being drunk at a previous hearing in HC11C00580. Now whether Justice Paul Morgan was or was not actually drunk at that hearing the mere fact that he has been accused of being drunk by one of the claimants, then that automatically makes Justice Paul Morgan look to the average citizen that  he may become biased and try t get back at the defendant for saying this about him, by ruling against the defendants to show one can not get away with openly critizising a judge like that.  It would be normal and understandable that Justice Paul Morgan would be hopping mad at being accused of being drunk at a hearing as to why he made such biased and wrongful judgments against the claimants in HC11C-0580 and against the defendant in HC06C002639.That is an attach on him as a person and anyone would be hopping mad act being accused of being drunk at a hearing and would in normally course of events want to get back at the people who accused him of being drunk while on duty as a judge and of having an alcohol problem. So just in this point alone Justice Paul Morgan has to immediately stand down form hearing HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 and a judge such as the Honourable Justice Briggs who has shown to be honourable and fair with integrity in his handling of these actions.
It is almost beyond belief that even before Justice Paul Morgan was ordered by the Chancellor of the High Court of Justice to handle all hearing for HC11C00580 and HC06C02639, Justice Paul Morgan was voted as the most corrupt judge in the United Kingdom by the INL News Group for the way he had handled Chancellor of the High Court of Justice and Justice Paul Morgan and the Chancellor of the High Court of Justice were both well aware that such allegations were openly shown on the World Internet on the www.awn.bz web site and other web sites in the World Internet. So what the Chancellor of the High Court of Justice did was in effect say  words to the effect " ...hey guys I know that the claimants in HC11C0080 are accusing you all of a serious criminal and/or civil conspiracy to defraud  .. I will not allow then to get away with this sort of behaviour against mates of mine in the legal system so I will order that Justice Paul Morgan has to handle all future hearings for  HC11C00580 and HC06C02639, because I can trust Justice Paul Morgan to make the orders necessary to help you guys out of trouble, as when it is important Justice Paul Morgan can be relied on making the judgment that will cover up any wrongdoing by barristers and solicitors ..in particular ones that are mates of mine..."
That is how the general public are going to view the situation is Justice Paul Morgan carries on with handling the hearings for  HC11C00580 and HC06C02639.. the law has
"...The public are also interested in the integrity of the decision making process. The method by which decisions are made must be, and seen to be, just..." Quote form the former Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia ( similar in legal standing to the House of Lords or the Privy Council in the United Kingdom) The Honourable Murray Gleeson Ac Judicial Review (1995) 2 TJR Page 117 to 140. 
There is no doubt that if Justice Paul Morgan does not immediately resign and/or remove himself from hearing all hearings associated with  HC11C00580 and HC06C02639, the public will not believe that there has been integrity in the decision making process and not only it is very likely of his past performances, that any orders made by Justice Paul Morgan will not be just, but there can be no doubt at all that any orders made by Justice Paul Morgan will not be seen to be just.. and that is the most important this here. regardless of how strong an argument is made at a later date that any orders made of Justice Paul Morgan in HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 on the 4th July, 2011 and the 8th November, 2011 in the High Court of Justice are a fair and just, the public who has very little knowledge of the finer points of  a complex legal system will never accept that any judgment made by Justice Paul Morgan in HC11C00580 and HC06C02639  could or would be fair and just..
 
If Justice Paul Morgan does not immediately stand down from  hearing HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 on the 4th July, 2011 and adjourn the hearing of the strike out applications, criminal contempt applications and civil restraint orders to the hearing on the 8th November, 2011when HC06C02639 to be heard by another judge, he is risking putting the whole public creditablity and integrity of the English Legal System at risk. Justice Paul Morgan has been accused of becoming a willing participant in the conspiracy to defraud alleged against the alleged the defendants in HC11C00580 being Nathan Tielelbaum property investor, Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Bude Nathan Iwanier Solicitors, Ingram Winter Green Solicitors, Fineland Investments Limited, Fineland Properties Limited, Northern Holdings Limited by helping the defendants obtain any orders they want regardless of the true facts and law involved in the matters being argued before the court. It doe snot matter whether one person or another agrees or disagrees that Justice Paul Morgan has acted in such a wrongful manner, what matters in that he is being accused of doing so, and in fact it has got tot he stage that the claimants want to apply to the court to join Paul Morgan as an individual to HC11C00580 for malefiance of a public officer for acting in a knowingly wrongful manner without care to abide by His Oath of Office when appointed a Judge in the High Court of Justice.
There is no way it could ever be seen to be proper by the public for a judge to be presiding over an application where the claimants of an action has applied to and/or making noises about applying tot he court for the judge himself to be joined to the action as a conspirator to a serious conspiracy to defraud the claimants in HC11C00580 and the Defendant in HC06C02639.
Justice Paul Morgan made a ruling in HC11C00580 that the defendant and its solicitors, security staff etc had an obligation to allow the Claimants in HC11C00580 to collect their belongings from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on or before the 6th May, 2011 which implies in law and in fact that the defendant and its solicitors, security staff etc, had an obligation to keep their belongings at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey safe and in good order or before the 6th May, 2011. Yet when the Claimants in HC11C00580 went to collect their belongings from 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey on or before the 6th May, 2011, they found many of their legal, personal and business papers, items and belongings missing, lost, stolen and/or damaged between the 1st April, 2011 and the 6th May, 2011 and thus have suffered severe loss and damage along with the fact it has made it impossible for the claimants in HC11C00580 and the defendant in HC06C02639 for fairly argue HC11C00580 and HC06C02639  until a complete new set of legal papers that were previously served on the claimants prior to the 6th May, 2011 in HC11C00580 and the defendant in HC06C02639 by the Defendants in HC11C00580 and all other material legal and business papers and documents are recovered what were previously stored at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey up the  1st April, 2011 when  the Defendants in HC11C00580  and/or their agents, servants, or otherwise forceably removed the claimants from  1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey  and took possession of  all the contents of 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey. There is no doubt that all the defendants in HC11C00580 and others are all jointly and severally liable for damages to the claimants in HC11C00580 for their their legal, personal and business papers, items and belongings missing, lost, stolen and/or damaged between the 1st April, 2011 and the 6th May, 2011 and that these damages have to be assessed by the court after and/or at a full trial of HC11C00580, along with the clear fact that it has become impossible to fairly argue their statement of case against the defendants in HC11C00580 without all their legala d business papers that were  stored at 1 Garratt Close, Beddington, Surrey up the the 1st April, 2011. There is also no doubt that until all the transcripts of all hearings before Justice Paul Morgan and Justice Briggs in HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 are transcribed and a copy made available to the claimants in HC11C00580 and the Defendant in HC06C02639 the applications to strike out, summary judgment, contempt of court and civil restraint orders in HC11C00580 should be heard and determined and that in any event such hearing should be adjourned tot eh 8th November, 2011 when the application to set aside the orders made by Acting Deputy Judge Alison Forster QC on the 31st January, 2011 in HC06C02639.
It is further stated that if Justice Paul Morgan continues to act in such a  biased manner as he has in previous hearings then one must be forced to ask him to resign as a judge of the High Court of Justice altogether.
From observations of the running of the High Court of Justice in London, there is need for a dramatic change in the way it is run…the court the way it is run at present shows it is run for the select and powerful few and not for the benefit of the average person to provide fair justice…where by it is standard practice to rule against a litigant in person, not to reads any of the submissions and/ or witness statements of a litigant in person.. just because they are a litigant in person.. files and application and other documents on courts files going missing etc… also it is standard and acceptable practice for barristers and solicitors to present false and misleading information tot eh court and to deliberately withhold material information from the court … this was show as wrong when a judge in 188 in the \chancery court locked uo a barrister until further notice for this sort of chicanery .. also see Moore v Peachy 1892 66 LTR 198 and Marshall v James CD 1905 Vol 1 where judgments were set aside because of material information that was witheld from the court…whether deliberately and/or innocently.. The inherent Jurisdiction of the Court,Halsbury Laws of England, Bullen and Leake, Carew-Reid b DL Jones (c5 if 1993) Aprio, 1994 Full Court of the Supreme Court of Western Australia : which confirmed the Elston case of Contempt of court, the book Suing Judges by Aimbola Olowofoyeku out on Clarendon Press; Linwood v Andrews and Moore High Court of Justice Chancery Division March 20 and 21 ( before Kay j) 612 Vol.LVIII N.S THE LAW TIMES June 1988.
 
I understand that change the degree the claimants are suggesting is very difficult to bring about and upsetting to those whom the change adversely effects because it takes them our of their comfort zone. In this regard we quote Maclavelli’s Prince…
“  …There is noting more difficult to carry out, not more doubtful of success, not more dangerous to handle, than to initiate a new order of things. For the reformer has enemies in all those who profit by the old order of things and only lukewarm defenders in all those who would profit by the new order, this lukewarmness arising partly form the fear of the adversaries and partly from the increduality of mankind, who do not truly believe in anything new until they have practical experience of it..”
Bertrand Russell to Lady Ottoline Morell, 27 August 1918:
“… When will people learn the robustness of truth? I do not know who my biographer may be, but I should like him to report ‘with what flourish his nature will’ something like this ‘ I was not a solemn stained glass saint,  existing only for the purposes of edification; I existed from my own centre, many things I did were regrettable. I lied and practiced hypocracy, because if I had not I should not have been allowed to do my work, but loved life and real people, and wished to get rid of the shams that prevent us from loving real people as they are. I believe in laughter and spontaneity, and trust to nature to bring out the genuine good in people, if once genuiness could come to be tolerated…”
The Unseen Hand by Rald Epperson who states he dedicated the book to Larry McDonald (1935-1983) who died because he dared to expose the very conspiracy that murdered him.
“…..What the reader will see as he progresses through the book. I am convinced, is a great conspiracy so immense that it poses the greatest threat to the freedoms and rights of all human beings, not only in the United States, but all over the world….”
The claimants also quote another previous Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia the Honourable Sir Anthony Mason in an article in the Western Australia Newspaper in 1993 entitles Chief Justice Backs Debate…..” Melbourne: Increased media scrutiny of judges would lead to a better legal system”  the Chief Justice of Australia said today. Speaking in Melbourne on the role of the courts in 2000. Sir Anthony Mason said that although recent gender unsettles judges, public debate was a long term boom. “Wider discussion will promote better understanding of the law and what the courts are doing,”, he said. “The law will have to be seen as a very important part of community life.” He said that, “ in the long run the benefits of an open system would outweight the problems of judicial criticism and lack of respect.”..” Perhaps judges no longer enjoy the status which their predecessors enjoyer,” Mr Justice Said, “ If that is so, judges do not stand alone. There are anumber of casualties of the general decline in respect for institutions and authority.” He said that..”although judicial eminence was sacrosanct for centuries, it was different today.” “There is a demand for openness. The media, if not the people want to know how power is being exercised.” He said.
From the way Justice Paul Morgan has dealt with hearings in HC11C00580 and HC06C02639 so far, that His Honout seems to be prepare to do his utmost to find a semi legal excuse to whitewash, cover up, condone etc., the abhorrent, immoral, illegal and/or wrongful behaviour of the defendants in HC11C00580 and the Plaintiff on HC06C02639 and/or their legal representatives and there is every indication he will continue to do so if he is allowed to continue and/or does not resign from dealing with HC11C00580 and HC06C02639. The claimants also insist that no judge that is of the Jewish Faith and/or is a member of the Freemason Society should be allowed to hear any cases concerning HC11C00580 and H06C02639 and if not removed he must resign in the interests of justice being air and also seen to be fair.
 
 
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_family
 
The Rothschild family (known as The House of Rothschild,[1] or more simply as the Rothschilds) is a European family of German Jewish origin that established European banking and finance houses from the late eighteenth century. Five lines of the Austrian branch of the family were elevated into the Austrian nobility, being given hereditary baronies of the Habsburg Empire by Emperor Francis II in 1816. The British branch of the family was elevated into the British nobility at the request of Queen Victoria.[2][3] It has been argued that during the 19th century, the family possessed by far the largest private fortune in the world, and by far the largest fortune in modern world history.[3][4][5]
The family's rise to European prominence began in 1744, with the birth of Mayer Amschel Rothschild in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, the son of Amschel Moses Rothschild (born circa 1710),[6] a money changer, who had traded with the Prince of Hesse. Born in the ghetto (called "Judengasse" or Jewish Alley) of Frankfurt, Mayer developed a finance house and spread his empire by installing each of his five sons in European cities to conduct business. The new kind of international firm the Rothschilds created was impervious to local attack. In 1819, anti-Semitic violence broke out in many parts of Germany. The Hep-Hep riots included an assault on the Rothschild house in Frankfurt, but the Rothschild fortune, being distributed widely, remained intact.[7] Another essential part of Mayer Rothschild's strategy for future success was to keep control of their businesses in family hands, allowing them to maintain full discretion about the size of their wealth and their business achievements. About 1906, the Jewish Encyclopedianoted: "The practice initiated by the Rothschilds of having several brothers of a firm establish branches in the different financial centers was followed by other Jewish financiers, like the Bischoffsheims, Pereires, Seligmans, Lazards, and others, and these financiers by their integrity and financial skill obtained credit not alone with their Jewish confrères, but with the banking fraternity in general. By this means Jewish financiers obtained an increasing share of international finance during the middle and last quarter of the nineteenth century. The head of the whole group was the Rothschild family...". It also states: "Of more recent years, non-Jewish financiers have learned the same cosmopolitan method, and, on the whole, the control is now rather less than more in Jewish hands than formerly."[8]
Following a royal and aristocratic technique, which also was copied later by business dynasties such as the Du Pont family,[9] Mayer Rothschild successfully kept the fortune in the family with carefully arranged marriages, including between first or second cousins, although by the later 19th century, almost all Rothschilds had started to marry outside the family, usually into the aristocracy or other financial dynasties.[9] His sons were:
  • Amschel Mayer Rothschild (1773–1855): Frankfurt, died childless, passed to sons of Salomon and Calmann
  • Salomon Mayer Rothschild (1774–1855): Vienna
  • Nathan Mayer Rothschild (1777–1836): London
  • Calmann Mayer Rothschild (1788–1855): Naples
  • Jakob Mayer Rothschild (1792–1868): Paris
The Rothschild coat of arms contains a clenched fist with five arrows symbolizing the five sons of Mayer Rothschild, a reference to Psalm 127: "Like arrows in the hands of a warrior". The family motto appears below the shield, in Latin, Concordia, Integritas, Industria, (Harmony, Integrity, Industry).[10] The German family name means "Red Shield". Today, it would be spelled "Rotschild", and is pronounced approximately ROT-shillt in German, not wroth(s)-child as it is in English. The surname "Rothschild" is not uncommon in Germany, and the vast majority of the bearers of the name are unrelated to this family. Moreover, the German surnames "Rothschild" and "Rothchild" are not related to the Protestant surname "Rothchilds" from the United Kingdom.
Families by country:
  • Rothschild banking family of Naples
  • Rothschild banking family of England
  • Rothschild banking family of Austria
  • Rothschild banking family of Germany
  • Rothschild banking family of France
  • Rothschild banking family of Switzerland

Jewish Identity and Positions on Zionism

Jewish solidarity in the family was not homogeneous. Some Rothschilds were supporters of Zionism, while other members of the family opposed the creation of the Jewish state. Some believed it would encourage anti-Semites to question the existing national identities of assimilated Jews around the rest of the world.[19] In 1917 Walter Rothschild, 2nd Baron Rothschild was the addressee of the Balfour Declaration to the Zionist Federation,[23] which committed the British government to the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. Later, Lord Victor Rothschild was against granting asylum or even help to Jewish refugees during the Holocaust.[19]
After the death of James Jacob de Rothschild in 1868, Alphonse Rothschild, his oldest son, who took over the management of the family bank, was the most active in support for Eretz Israel.[24]  The Rothschild family archives show that during the 1870s the family contributed nearly 500,000 francs per year on behalf of Eastern Jewry to the Alliance Israélite Universelle.[25] Baron Edmond James de Rothschild, James Jacob de Rothschild's youngest son was a patron of the first settlement in Palestine at Rishon-LeZion, and bought from Ottoman landlords parts of the land which now makes up present-day Israel. In 1924, he established the Palestine Jewish Colonization Association (PICA), which acquired more than 125,000 acres (22,36 km²) of land and set up business ventures.[26] In Tel Aviv, he has a road, Rothschild Boulevard, named after him as well as various localities throughout Israel which he assisted in founding including Metulla, Zikhron Ya'akov, Rishon Lezion, and Rosh Pina. A park in Boulogne-Billancourt, Paris, the Parc Edmond de Rothschild (Edmond de Rothschild Park) is also named after its founder.[27] The Rothschilds also played a significant part in the funding of Israel's governmental infrastructure. James A. de Rothschild financed the Knesset building as a gift to the State of Israel[28] and the Supreme Court of Israel building was donated to Israel by Dorothy de Rothschild.[29] Outside the President's Chamber is displayed the letter Mrs. Rothschild wrote to the then current Prime Minister Shimon Peres expressing her intention to donate a new building for the Supreme Court.[30]
Interviewed by Haaretz in 2010, Baron Benjamin Rothschild, a Swiss-based member of the banking family, said that he supported the peace process: "I understand that it is a complicated business, mainly because of the fanatics and extremists – and I am talking about both sides. I think you have fanatics in Israel... In general I am not in contact with politicians. I spoke once with Netanyahu. I met once with an Israeli finance minister, but the less I mingle with politicians the better I feel." On the subject of religious identity, he stated that he held an open-minded attitude: "We do business with all kinds of countries, including Arab countries[...] My oldest daughter's boyfriend is a Saudi. He is a great guy and if she will want to marry him, she can."
Signed
 
The Claimants
 HC11C00580 and the Defendant in HC06C02639

 

Further Submissions for Claimants in HC11C00580 being Janice Vivienne Pritchard and others v Natham Tietelbaun and others
This should be read by Morgan J before he agrees to sign his proposed orders regarding the hearing dated the 13th April, 2011 in HC11C00580 and before the below mentioned Attorneys further encourage Morgan J to sign to such his proposed draft orders orders regarding the hearing dated the 13th April, 2011 in HC11C00580. If these orders are signed they will have been based on false and misleading information put before the court and the withholding of material information from the court by the below names attorneys and their named legal firms, this such orders would automatically set aside by the Full Court when the criminal contempt application against all these attorneys and their firms is successful and these attorneys and their other legal partners will end up in prison, lose their legal license to practice law and have to pay substantial damages that has been caused by their obvious and blatant contempt of court
David Rosen Attorney at Law INL News Group
21st April, 2011
Emailed to:
"Watson, Heather (HMCS-RCJ, RCJ-Chancery)"< heather.watson@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
"Katie Birchall" <kbirchall@4pumpcourt.com>,  "Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale"@radcliffechambers.com>;, "Francis Bacon <Francis.Bacon"@hailshamchambers.com>;,
 clerks@hailshamchambers.com,  jbk@bn1law.co.uk, “Mendy” aeb@bn1law.co.uk, “Vv” <vv@bnilaw.co.uk, “Bd”<bd@bn1law.co.uk>, “Daniel Zysblat” <dz@bnilaw.co.uk, geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk,  info@iwg.co.uk
 john carewreid <johncarewreid@googlemail.com>, jacksons@fishburnslaw.com "Buss, Alan" <alan.buss@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk, SRuffles@blg.co.uk
"Tony Nurse-Marsh" <tnurse-marsh@blg.co.uk>,
david.rosen@inlnews.com, admin@jamison.biz, sallylpalmer@gmail.com,
Urgent Attention:
Watson, Heather (HMCS-RCJ, RCJ-Chancery) heather.watson@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Heather Watson
Clerk to Mr Justice Morgan
T: 0207 947 6419
F: 0207 947 6062
Katie Birchall <kbirchall@4pumpcourt.com>,
Marie-Claire Bleasdale <MCBleasdale@radcliffechambers.com>,
Francis Bacon <Francis.Bacon@hailshamchambers.com>;,
clerks@hailshamchambers.com,
john carewreid <johncarewreid@googlemail.com>,
jacksons@fishburnslaw.com
"Buss, Alan" <alan.buss@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Sophie Ruffles
Associate
Direct Telephone:             +44 207 643 8407      
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9258
Mobile:  
Email: SRuffles@blg.co.uk

Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
Beaufort House, 15 St. Botolph Street, London EC3A 7NJ.
Telephone :             +44 (0)20 7247 2277      
Fax : +44 (0)20 7643 8500
Web Site :
http://www.blg.co.uk
VAT Number: 945619101

Daniel J Ginsbury
- Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House,
21A John St.,
London WC1N 2BF
DX1055 London/Chancery Lane
Telephone: 020 7845 7400
Facsimile: 020 7845 7401
Email:
info@iwg.co.uk

geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk
 
 
Marie Clair Bleasdale – Barrister at Radcliffe Chambers
11 New Square Lincoln’s Inn London WC2A 3QB DX LDE 319
Tel:             +44 (0) 20 7831 0081       Fax: +44(0) 20 7405 2560 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44(0) 20 7405 2560      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Email: clerks@radcliffechambers.com
www.radcliffechambers.com
CC: Johathan Barry Kandler-Aaron Emanuel Bude- Bernard Dubiner- Daniel Giden Zysblat- Nathan Naftalie Iwanier -  Vivian Naftali Vernick -Bude Nathan Iwaner Solicitors
1-2 Temple Fortune Parade Bridge Lane LondonNW11 0QN – DX 92006 TempleFortune
Tel:             +44 (0) 20 8458 5656       Fax: +44 (0) 20 8458 5065 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44 (0) 20 8458 5065      end_of_the_skype_highlighting
Emails:info@bn1law.co.uk,  jbk@bn1law.co.uk,  “ N Iwanier”<ni@bnilaw.co.uk>, 
“Mendy” aeb@bn1law.co.uk,  
“Vv” <vv@bnilaw.co.uk;   “Bd”<bd@bn1law.co.uk> “Daniel Zysblat” <dz@bnilaw.co.uk
CC: Alison Foster QC, Sitting Deputy Judge Chancery Division
Care Of  Clerk for Alison Foster Sitting Deputy Judge Chancery Division
: Alistair Davidson Tel:             +44(0) 20 7832 1111       Fax: +44(0) 20 7353 3978 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting            +44(0) 20 7353 3978      end_of_the_skype_highlighting

http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/links.htm
Background on Daniel Jacob Ginsbury partners of Ingram Winter Green London Attorney at Law-Sophie Ruffles .. Tony Nurse Marsh partners of Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP Attorneys at Law , Jonathan Barry Kandler of Bude Nathan Iwanier Attorneys at Law, Nigel Matthews of Denniss Matthews Solicitors, Attorney Marie Calire Bleasdale, Alison Foster QC, Morgan J- Judge in the High Court of Justice in London-Chancery Division and others...

http://awn.bz/CorruptLondonMetPolice.html



There is no doubting that the conspiracy to defraud, damage and completely destroy the lives of Janice Vivienne Pritchard and her son Robert Carter that committed by a group of corrupt and immoral attorney and barristers in the United Kingdom, namely
 Daniel Jacob Ginsbury,  David Peter Daws Malcolm Alan Gordon,   Michael Adrian Compton,  Nathan Anthony Edwards,   Elizabeth Jane Bartle, Sanjay Chandarana,  and their legal firm Ingram Winter Green,
Soffie Ruffles and Tony Nurse March and their legal firm Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
 Johathan Barry Kandler, Aaron Emanuel Bude, Bernard Dubiner,  Daniel Giden Zysblat, Nathan Naftalie Iwanier,  Vivian Naftali Vernick,  and their legal firm Bude Nathan Iwaner Solicitors,
has been done many time before, and these devious, immoral, illegal and wrongful acts have not gone unnoticed in the worls media on the world wide web and one has ot assume they are all true becaus etere has not been any attmepts whatsoever to take legla action ot have the information on these various websites removed from the world wide web, and uless a criminal contempt application is made against these attorneys, QC's and judges etc to have them inprisoned and pay damages thathave resulted form these criminial contempt, conspiray ot defraud , conspiracy to purvert the course of justice, knowingly and deliberately presenting false and misleading information to the court and withholding material information from the court to obtain wrongful, unjust, immoral andillegal court orders and other crimes and worngful and immoral acts,
these these people will simply carry on doing all the worngful, immoral and illegal acts and the court system and the legal system, that their mates control in the United Kingdom will continue to protect them from be exposed and from being accountable to their actions.
These people are turning  the legal system in the United Kingdon into a complete public disgrace...the English legal system is a fair and honourable system, however these people are working together to abuse the system so badly that the general public will in the end not trusting the English Legal System, and when that happens.... the United Kingdom will end up having no rule of law that the general public can trust and rely on..... and when that happens there will be absolute caos in the United Kingdom, and people will start taking the law into their own hands... so the honest people in the English Legal System must immediately stand up and prosecute those that are acting in a corrupt, illegal and/or wrongful way before it is too late... or those that are acting in a corrupt , illegal and/or wrongful way must stop and start to act in a proper manner before it is too late for them, and before it is too late for the legal system as a whole.
 
David Rosen
Attorney at Law
INL News Group -USA
Email: david.rosen.com
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury, Solicitor,
Solicitor London
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
Bedford House
London
WC1N 2BL
England
Address
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
Bedford House
London
WC1N 2BL
England
Contact data
Phone :             +44 (0) 20 7845 7400      
Contact data
[Display contact details]
Qualification
  • Solicitor
Fields of Law
  • Commercial property
  • Conveyancing residential
  • Landlord and tenant - residential
Languages
  • English
  • Spanish
  • Italian
  • Hebrew
  • Punjabi
  • Urdu

Daniel Jacob Ginsbury ...
Terence St J Millett 34 Sumner Place London SW7 \

http://www.aboutus.org/MetPoliceCroydon.co.uk

A Solicitor enters a bar and spots a tasty looking girl sitting on a stool. He walks up to her and says, "Hey there, how's it going?" She turns around, looks him straight in the eye and says, "I'll screw anyone, any time, anywhere, your place, my place, it doesn't matter." 
"Really," he replies. "What firm do you work for?" 
MetPoliceCroydon.co.uk
Wiki Title Home page Description
Excerpted from the website description:
NOT Croydon Policeone of the non bovine excrement sites that give you the reality of Policing and Local Government in the Banana Republic of Croydonia.
Languages
English
Address
21 Agaton Rd, New Eltham, Sidcup
Kent SE9 3RN UNITED KINGDOM
Additional Information
Related Domains
http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/links.htm

http://www.legalxchange.co.uk/colinlinks.htm

http://www.ingramwintergreen.org/ 
why the malevolent disparagement herein? . . . . Ingram Winter Green not only have the problem of what to do about these sites as far as the general public, who search on their name . . . but sometimes more importantly what to say to their’ peers about why they are not doing anything about it. . . I want my readers to be in absolutely no doubt just how much of a problem this is . . . . and hence my excruciating letters . . .I WANT TO DEMONSTRATE BY INFERENCE, THAT BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT INGRAM WINTER GREEN WILL NOT GO TO COURT to prevent me doing this because they know that they lied and dare not admit it in court. Ingram Winter Green deserve this excruciating disdain.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site is not for the sensitive who don’t know what a W*nker is.
http://www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk 
What is not in doubt is the incompetence of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in particular in not being able to solve this problem.. . . . . me. . . . . the only solution they have come up with so far is bar their fax machine to my own, then hide behind the sofa and hope it will all go away. These are the people who sell the service of protecting others at exorbitant cost. Yet they can’t even protect themselves as these sites verify.
One of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that IWG will not reply to.
http://www.dennissmatthews.co.uk 
I have now asked you THREE TIMES . . . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in order to defraud me of my considerable claims against the freeholder of the above address? Are there any words you do not understand?
Another of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that Denniss Matthews will not reply to
 
·     Barnett-Ross.co.uk
·     BarnettRoss.org.uk
·     BlogSpot.com
·     British-Gas.org
·     Cracc.co.uk
·     CroydonCouncil.info
·     CroydonGuardian.co.uk
·     DennissMatthews.co.uk
·     DennissMatthews.org
·     Glalibdems.org.uk
·     Google.co.uk
·     HomeOffice.gov.uk
·     IngramWintergreen.co.uk
·     IngramWintergreen.me.uk
·     IngramWintergreen.org
·     IWg-Solicitors.co.u
·     KentPoliceFraud.co.uk
·     LawyerBaiting.co.uk
·     Mcp-law.org
·     MetcalfeCopemanPettiFar.co.uk
·     MetPoliceLondon.co.uk
·     Nscglobal.com
·     OmbudsmanWatch.org
·     PenthouseHealthAndBeauty.com
·     Piba.org.uk
·     Police.uk
·     RedPepper.org.uk
·     Sir-Ian-Blair.co.uk
·     SpanishBeauty.me.uk
·     Uk.org
·     Vnunet.com
·     WickhamWindows.co.uk
http://www.legalxchange.co.uk/colinlinks.htm
Taken (with permission) from here http://www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/page8a.html 
 Colin's comments are in green.
My favourite quote is however from . . . . http://www.law-society.co.uk/ . . . . . . According to Mr Taranjeet Babra the Caseworker of the Law Society, quote "if a Solicitor has been negligent it does not mean he has given poor service"
Doesn’t that just about say it all?
 
http://www.name-n-shame.co.uk/
The power of words versus the stench of corruption
Society is full of people with no scruples; people who are morally and/or financially corrupt; people who are determined to rip us off at all costs; people with no integrity who will never recognise or acknowledge the truth because their own world is based entirely on lies.
These people usually form themselves into like-minded groups and close ranks to present an almost impregnable barrier to outsiders. Or they may find an innocent scapegoat to blame; some innocent fool who tried to speak the truth. If good people continue to turn a blind eye to the activities of these parasites, they will continue to prosper. In many cases, the law actually protects them but perhaps that merely confirms that those who introduce and enforce laws have in their midst some of the most dishonest and corrupt members of our society. Our aim is to name and shame these people and we welcome your help. Though our current government seems determined to deny our right to freedom of speech it is still our right and we must use it.
The POWER of words indeed . . . great site . . does exactly what it says on the tin.
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,6903,1328964,00.html
“The Law Society's less-than-heroic track-record on complaints has dogged the profession for years. In fact, it could well be its undoing. Sir David Clementi, former deputy governor of the Bank of England, is conducting a review of regulation of the legal profession which reports in December. Which?, the consumers' association, reckons the profession's inability to deal with unhappy clients is 'the greatest threat to self-regulation'.”

AND NOT BEFORE TIME . . . Let’s  hope we can rid ourselves of these dishonourable people.
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/laworjustice.html#well  
“Are corrupt / pervert males appointed as judges, magistrates and police-chiefs? 
" We think the evidence says so " 
A great site with hundreds of actual examples and argument.

http://www.unjustis.co.uk/ 
England has a serious problem with organised crime - The Law Society and rogue solicitors ARE the problem. Criminals - committing fraud and theft in England is easy - get a solicitor to help you. If you believe that solicitors belong to an honourable, trustworthy profession, you are gravely mistaken.
Another great site ’unjustis’ with hundreds more examples. . . . They have a link page similar to this one. http://www.unjustis.co.uk/Support/similar_sites.htm 
http://www.tribweb.co.uk/milligan28112003.htm 
Lawyers have been a law unto themselves for too long. Duncan Milligan advocates a speedy reform of the legal profession. MPs described this as deceitful and dishonest and are calling on the Law Society to ask the lawyers to repay the money in full. Unfortunately, the Law Society will probably do what it always does: nothing. 

http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/ 
Welcome to
the Human-Rights web site. THE independent group of public spirited citizens whose aim is none other than to expose the established practices many fall victim to within the United Kingdom.


http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/historic/justice1/reports-02/j1r02-12-02.htm 
This has led the Ombudsman to "question seriously" whether the Society balances correctly the interests of the profession and the interests of the public.12 
They’ve got there same problem in Scotland. . . . . And they are always complaining they don’t get the same service we do in England?

And in Ireland . . . . . . . 

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2091-1632764,00.html 
O’Sullivan, who does not admit distributing the leaflets, said he initially set up the Irish website because he “couldn’t get anywhere with the legal system”. “The way people know each other in the legal profession seems to me to be the biggest problem,” he said. 

http://www.derbygripe.co.uk/law.htm  . . . . By Martin Mitchell 
LAW SOCIETY GRAVY TRAIN HITS THE BUFFERS AT FULL SPEED
A great site well worth a visit . . .lots of other stuff too about Derby Council
http://www.olso.org.uk/ 
This Web Site is being established to warn people that if they make a complaint to the Law Society about a Solicitor's poor service and incompetency the chances of getting a proper or fair resolution to your complaint is probably about NIL. What you will find is that instead of trying to find any positives in your complaint they will do their very best to make every possible excuse under the sun so that the solicitor will be found not guilty of doing anything wrong.
How can I improve on that?

A Solicitor enters a bar and spots a tasty looking girl sitting on a stool. He walks up to her and says, "Hey there, how's it going?" She turns around, looks him straight in the eye and says, "I'll screw anyone, any time, anywhere, your place, my place, it doesn't matter." 
"Really," he replies. "What firm do you work for?" 
You cant get into this site probably for legal reasons?
Book THE MOST CORRUPT BRITISH JUDGES: Dr A Adoko Dr Adoko won a landmark case against the law society for racial discrimination but costs over £14,000 were awarded against him by judges. He was obliged to write this book which indicates the judiciary`s bias for British authorities against the ... http://www.corruptjudges.co.uk/ 
But you can get an explanation here. 
http://www.elc.org.uk/papers/2000Adoko.doc
http://www.scottishlawyerwatch.org/ 
Of all the professions that have evolved in our society, none have ever come close to matching the legal profession for downright deceit and dishonesty. The legal profession is immutable, intransigent, self-protective, unaccountable, incompetent and corrupt.
THIS IS A FABULOUS SITE . SO PROFESSIONAL . WE NEED AN EQUIVALENT HERE . . IT NAMES AND SHAMES (you’d like to think so . . but some are so thick skinned) THEM ALL . . WONDERFUL STUFF. . . . Scotland Against Crooked Lawyers
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/news/prout/pr_131.asp?id=131 
Five persons have been charged in connection with an alleged investment fraud perpetrated through three solicitors' firms. The defendants are:
Peter Edmund Barnett, solicitor (resident of Bishops Stortford) formerly of Rhodes Barlow, Hertfordshire.
Michael Wilson-Smith* (Haywards Heath) formerly of Wilson-Smith & Co., London (* Wilson-Smith and Ruparelia are former solicitors) Martin Tobias-Gibbins (Berkhamstead), a former client Imdad Ullah (London ), a former client
http://www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk 
What is not in doubt is the incompetence of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in particular in not being able to solve this problem.. . . . . me. . . . . the only solution they have come up with so far is bar their fax machine to my own, then hide behind the sofa and hope it will all go away. These are the people who sell the service of protecting others at exorbitant cost. Yet they can’t even protect themselves as these sites verify.
One of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that IWG will not reply to.
http://www.dennissmatthews.co.uk 
I have now asked you THREE TIMES . . . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in order to defraud me of my considerable claims against the freeholder of the above address? Are there any words you do not understand?
Another of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that Denniss Matthews will not reply to
http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/ 
In their "extreme defence" first of all their Council Catriona "Merciless when necessary" Duthie, St Johns Chambers, Bristol tried lying to the Judge regarding that damning "heading" on their original estimate (the heading that stated they had included costs which were NOT my responsibility and which they had refused to explain to the Law Society or the Judge). However, they didn't push this too far because the Judge said he was tempted to ask for a transcript. If he had done so I'm sure Catriona Duthie would have weaseled out of it by claiming that her memory was at fault. Yeah, Right! It's STILL a misleading lie as far as I'm concerned... it WAS untrue... and she IS on record... trying to mislead a Judge in a family case. Umm, a bit "extreme" when all I wanted was a detailed bill? There is MORE...
A Rant about a firm of Solicitors . . .FDC Law, (Faulkner, Daniel & Cruttwell Solicitors) Norton House, High Street, Midsomer Norton, BA3 2DF - and Patricia Wayman Senior Ptnr, in particular.
This firm also has offices in Frome and Paulton. . . LOADS to see . . lots of interesting links . . . and a whole section about Fathers . . could do with linking up to parents 4 protest
http://www.standyourground.co.uk/ 
Certain business people, their accountants, solicitors and bank managers have been together in a 'ring' for some thirty years in driving people out of business and picking up their business premises, homes, farms, plots of land etc way beneath market value, financed by amongst other things black market and drugs money. Originally it was thought the area was around Aberystwyth, Mid Wales but it quickly became apparent that these scams are widespread throughout the country.
Started off as a local RANT but soon spread out.
http://www.roughjustice.org.uk/ 
The purpose of this website, is to give information based on my own experiences in using solicitors, ombudsmen, the Law Society, (The Office for the Supervision of Solicitors). This experience, gained from bitter and hard lessons in dealing with people who you might think were on the side of justice, especially the Law Society, hopefully will forewarn you, and make you more able to seek justice in a prepared manner. . . .
Can’t say fairer than that.
http://www.ex.ac.uk/~RDavies/arian/scandals/ 
While most of the cases in these pages involve real or suspected criminal activity a few are included simply because the scale of the incompetence or greed makes them scandalous.
Self explanatory.
When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law before he gets arrested, we call him an accomplice.
When a person assists a criminal in breaking the law after the criminal gets arrested, we call him a lawyer.
to which I'd add - i.e. NOT in Colin's words
When a person assists a criminal lawyer in breaking the law, we call him "Your Honour".
 
http://members.aol.com/lawawful/
Theoretically it is an independent body but the Law Society has removed the previous director and taken direct control. Its inefficiency is so great that the present Lord Chancellor gave the OSS until the end of the year 2000 to put its house in order.
Less of a RANT . . but plenty of facts.

http://www.action4justice-fairhearing.org.uk/
On 8th July, 1997, Nolan recommended a statutory criminal offence of misuse of public office to apply to everyone, including "Ministers and Civil Servants; Councillors and Local Government Officers; the police, magistrates and the judiciary; and to non-governmental public bodies." 
John Major had promised that he would implement anything Nolan recommended. Tony Blair came to power saying Labour would change what was wrong. But somehow this important change to the way we're governed has fallen by the wayside.
The mystery is not why it was "disappeared" but who-done-it? 
caught Good solid political stuff . . This is what it’s really all about.

http://www.law-society.co.uk/ 
If the complaints system was run by an independent and impartial body many more solicitors would be found to be incompetent and have given poor service. The Law Society does not want to happen as it is not in their interest, and thus it controls the complaints procedures itself ,ensuring that the decisions lack what the man on the street would call logic and fairness.
This is still my favourite site . . And closest to my heart . . It takes on The Corrupt Law Society going straight for the jugular.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/3340901.stm 
Even when they are caught they are let off.
http://www.ibtl.org.uk 
IBTL has been established for the sole purpose of offering help, advice and assistance to people who have been ill served by the law. We are a charitable organisation who are funded entirely through grants and donations. We have been established now for almost 10 years.
Contact & Help Site for victims of the rest of these pages.

http://www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk/ 
DAVID BLUNKETT AND YVETTE COOPER KNOW ALL! They covered up and kept the lid on Pandora’s Box of undeniable premeditated judicial corruption!! Also included in this DOCUMENTED PROOF, he has deliberately lied!
Mans got a beef. . . 

http://www.freeclaim.co.uk/nnews_story6.htm 
Solicitors' commercial arrangements with claims management companies undermine their duty to the client, says John Barstow. SOLICITORS ARE seen as “arrogant, slow and crooked” according to an article in the Guardian on 26 August 2002 reporting the ICM Poll commissioned by the RAC.

http://www.unjustis.co.uk/News/News.htm#Special 
The Law Society in England and Wales appears to have abandoned all pretence of maintaining any decent standards at all. For those of you with an interest in this matter, you might consider how another solicitor who was struck off for lying to clients and stealing their money has been recently restored to the Roll.
Fantastic site . . full of information . . facts . . . and RANTS in between.

http://www.ingramwintergreen.org/ 
why the malevolent disparagement herein? . . . . Ingram Winter Green not only have the problem of what to do about these sites as far as the general public, who search on their name . . . but sometimes more importantly what to say to their’ peers about why they are not doing anything about it. . . I want my readers to be in absolutely no doubt just how much of a problem this is . . . . and hence my excruciating letters . . .I WANT TO DEMONSTRATE BY INFERENCE, THAT BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT INGRAM WINTER GREEN WILL NOT GO TO COURT to prevent me doing this because they know that they lied and dare not admit it in court. Ingram Winter Green deserve this excruciating disdain.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site is not for the sensitive who don’t know what a W*nker is.

http://www.which.net/media/pr/jun04/which/solicitors.html  
Almost all those who did complain to their solicitors' practice were unhappy with the way their complaint was dealt with. Nearly three quarters said their complaint wasn't resolved.
 
http://www.which.net/press/releases/other/050321_watchdogs_nr.html 
Nick Stace, communications director, Which?, said "Self-regulation isn't working. People complain to Which? time and again about the second rate service they receive from solicitors; often during stressful times. Other professions can't get away with this type of behaviour and it's time for the government to rein in this complaint-riddled industry."
Hear Hear

http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/freedom.htm      
http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/lord_charlie.htm#slj  'The Times' Charlie 'Lord of Nonsence' Click Here
A letter I sent to 'Tony's Crony', Lord 'Charlie' Falconer, who I have so far found to be as straight has a '9 Bob Note' that shows just how corrupt the 'Legal Mafia' are. I'm sure there are some 'Nights in Shining Armour' out there; we know there are plenty of 'Al Capone's' but the ones that 'Severely Damage Your Health' are the 'Cowboys'. A label Mr A Higgins QC put on Thos Boyd Whyte Solicitors in Bexleyheath, Kent, UK. Unfortunately for any Complainants the 'Legal Mafia' have 'Sammy the Bull' and 'Mikey' who between them had never heard of the 'Marquis of Queensberry'. Click Here to read the letter and some remarks 'Charlie' made on 'Human Rights'. 
It seems to me that a great number of the people who sit-in judgment on the 'common English' public are either pedophiles, or paying shirt lifters of young persons or god knows what and if they are caught with their trousers down' then Lord 'Charlie' first of all try's to do a 'cover-up' which ends up with a year's 'gardening leave' and then a £1,000,000.00 pay off. 
Just what happens if a 'common member of the public' is foolish enough to make a complaint against these 'Custodians' of the English Law System? http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com/ombudsman.htm 
Big site . . this one has run for years . . . I first spotted it a year ago and it gave me the ideas to do my own sites. . . It certainly works . . when I was looking for a Solicitor . . . I did indeed avoid Thos Boyd Whyte as the site says . . and I only live round the corner.
The bit about the Law Society acting against complainants leads us nicely on to . . . 

http://www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page4.html 
The point is Law Society . . that if there is defamation or harm to a Co caused by this. . . then it is 
up to that Co to use what everyone else has to use . . . THE LAW . . . NOT other devious means like have a go at the service providers. . . . THOSE back hand days of (usually Masonic influence) are going to be over. Your impotence freely admitted in The Gazette shows that. The point is Law Society . . . These firms of Solicitors have an advantage that none us has. FREE Legal Advice . . . FREE Legal Representation . . . FREE Access to Legal Services. . . .the trouble is they wouldn’t want to rely on that advice . . if they were any good they wouldn’t be on these web sites. But we are supposed to rely on them and they expect to charge a fortune for it. “CONCERN MOUNTS” YOU SAY? . . . NOT HERE IT DOESN’T . . . YOU JUST DON’T GET IT DO YOU LAW SOCIETY? IF YOU ACTED PROPERLY HONESTLY AND WITHOUT PREJUDICE and were INCORRUPT ABLE. NONE OF US (and there will be lots more) WOULD NEED TO DO THIS. AND THE MORE PEOPLE THAT DO, THE MORE TENUOUS YOUR POSITION BECOMES. . . One day it will be GOOD RIDDANCE. THIS IS ALL YOUR FAULT . . YOU CAN’T DECEIVE ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME. Similarly the
LEGAL SERVICES OMBUDSMAN for condoning your disgraceful bias. What you’re annoyed about is your total IMPOTENCE. The fact that matters are being dealt with outside your control.
OK I admit it . . from another of my sites . . but it is a RANT entirely on behalf of Rick Kordowski in his dispute with Moss and Coleman Solicitors, Hornchurch. The point is . . there is published evidence of The Law Society’s meddling and circumnavigation of the LAW. They publish it in their own journal The Gazette 24/02/05. . . . THEY’RE BLOODY WELL PROUD OF IT . . . . for goodness sake.

http://www.geocities.com/profrogues/   
It is a complete and utter waste of time contacting the Legal Ombudsman, as once again staff at the Ombudsman's office like Simon Entwistle, are selected by non other than the Law Society. They are swamped with client complaints, and consequently cannot cope with the influx. It is far easier for them to dismiss a claim, and hope you won't bother them anymore,than to spend time investigating your case. The Law Society and it's members top the list when it comes to "cover ups", simply because they do NOTHING to assist the public in a negligence claim. Judges also "cover up" serious solictor/barrister misconduct, and I have evidence to back up that claim.
Brilliant site . . . very concise . . gets it exactly right . . . more of the same but well put.

http://www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk/ 
WALLYBALL . . . The excruciating game that any no of Solicitors can play.
HAVEN’T-A-CLUEDO . The page that shows these people up for what they really are. A bunch of tossers.
ARE YOU BEING SERVED? . . . The page that teaches 5 year olds what to do with intimidating letters issued by TOSSERS.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site . . . well . . . basically takes the piss out of the lot of them.

http://www.hartjournals.co.uk/le/volumes/6/issues/2/457.html 
The Regulatory Crisis in the Solicitors’ Profession .Mark Davies .Sussex Law School, Uni of Sussex 
Self-regulation and discipline by the solicitor’s profession is in crisis. There is evidence of failure at all levels, from the efficient resolution of straightforward complaints, to ensuring the public is not exposed to dishonest solicitors. Changes by the Law Society in recent years have either failed to meet expectations or have diverted resources away from other problems. In this article I draw together a range of criticisms of the current approach to self-regulation and raise the question of whether or not the current regulatory model is sustainable. I will consider whether changes in the size and nature of the solicitors profession has resulted in the need for radical rethinking about the fundamental nature and structure of the regulatory system.
So it’s not just us that’s saying it. The Government know it’s true . . WHY DON’T THEY DO SOMETHING?

http://www.ca-la.org/html/lawyers.html 
WHY CROOKED LAWYERS GO FREE "a grievance system that moves in secret , then winds up disciplining a minuscule percent of those whose conduct is complained about, can be neither effective nor creditable." Here's what must be done If your lawyer mishandles your case, charges exorbitant fee or steals your money, what can you do about it? Short of suing for malpractice , you must take your complaint to a grievance committee made up of other lawyers. What are your chances of getting a fair hearing? According to all available statistics, they are so slim that you would be wasting your time.
De je vue? . . Well actually it’s NOT The Law Society’s fault . . . This is AMERICA 

http://www.parents4protest.co.uk/p4p/solicitors.htm 
P4p believes this webpage published two years ago in the naming of whom we believe are bad solicitors is justified. An opinion supported by hundreds of letters that P4p receive yearly from Fathers, Mothers, Grandparents and even Children who have reported to us the listed offices below. P4p never include on the webpage any unscrupulous FC office/s until we have received two or more detailed complaints about the same legal individual within that office.
This one is going to need a page of its’s own . . there are dozens of ‘blacklisted’ lawyers on this page. . . . I don’t know what the cases are . . I DON’T CARE . . if the allegations weren’t true the Solicitors could do something about it . . . by definition they do not deserve to be Solicitors. . . CLICK HERE >>>>
1.  The LegalXchange - Copy of Colin's Links
... of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in ... conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors ...
www.legalxchange.co.uk/colinlinks.htm - Cached
2.  Page 11/472 · Solicitor’s Offices Conveyancing residential · Search ...
Ingram Winter Green 21A John Street London WC1N 2BL ... Jane Bartle » Nathan Anthony Edwards » Daniel Jacob Ginsbury ... Terence St J Millett 34 Sumner Place London SW7 ...
www.mcadvo.co.uk/GB/en/advoofficelist/372_f14da_conveyancing... - Cached
3.  MetPoliceCroydon.co.uk - AboutUs Wiki Page
IWg-Solicitors.co.uk; KentPoliceFraud.co.uk; LawyerBaiting ... Croydon_Council_GUILTY, Croydon_Police, Daniel_Ginsbury's ... East_Anglia, Gun_Crime, IWG, Ingram_Winter_Green, ...
www.aboutus.org/MetPoliceCroydon.co.uk - Cached
 
 
Sophie Ruffles
Associate
Direct Telephone:             +44 207 643 8407      
Direct Fax: +44 207 071 9258
Mobile:  
Email: SRuffles@blg.co.uk
Barlow Lyde & Gilbert LLP
Beaufort House, 15 St. Botolph Street, London EC3A 7NJ.
Telephone :             +44 (0)20 7247 2277      
Fax : +44 (0)20 7643 8500
Web Site :
http://www.blg.co.uk
VAT Number: 945619101

Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
- Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House,
21A John St.,
London WC1N 2BF
DX1055 London/Chancery Lane
Telephone: 020 7845 7400
Facsimile: 020 7845 7401
Email:
info@iwg.co.uk
geraldinepaletz@iwg.co.uk

http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/links.htm
 
Not there yet - but a few more - Updated November 2006
New! Website - www.echr-action.co.uk - Human Rights - New!
A few new ones too ... new contacts ... new pages
Dr. Rita Pal - (one could say a LOT here) - http://ritapal.com 
Families and more .... http://www.troublesover.co.uk
;-) Colin - http://www.mcp-law.org/ and http://www.mcp-law.org/page12.html :-)
http://divorce-solicitor-trap.co.uk/ 
I am leaving the majority of my old links on the main page and the tiny weenie bit I did before at the bottom...
Going Great Guns... In the mean time try Rick's site if you are looking for a solicitor (or to warn the world about an awful one) http://www.solicitorsfromhell.co.uk/ ... not to be confused with Brian's original http://www.solicitorsfromhell.com - I like the style and giving NAMES to the enemy.  It seems hell is a lasting theme associated with solicitors. More listed every day ;-)
For my money Paul's http://www.unjustis.co.uk/News/NewsRoundup_2005.htm is an excellent and worthwhile publication.  Just a few of the older sites still worth a special mention.
No, I'm still not properly organised - efforts are (were) going into the Legal eXchange www.legalxchange.co.uk which (I hopeed) will (would) launch in pilot form very soon.  Something you can participate in - please keep an eye out. Still not there - Nov. 2006 - keep checking :-) ... sorry.
Protest sites are a growing phenomenon.  All have their own styles but one thing is certain - all those who take the trouble to create them really believe that things need to change and all are disgusted and cannot accept that there is NOTHING we can do...
The following links are lifted directly from Colin's web site (with permission).  Colin's style is very 21st Century - children cover your eyes or we'll be hearing .... "Dad, what's that place?"  "It's a solicitor's office, son."  "Do Tossers live there?"  "Yes son. Who told YOU?"
Colin certainly works hard and has collected MANY links...

The contents of this page have been taken from: - http://www.sir-ian-blair.co.uk/page7.html
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/cash/story/0,6903,1328964,00.html
“The Law Society's less-than-heroic track-record on complaints has dogged the profession for years. In fact, it could well be its undoing. Sir David Clementi, former deputy governor of the Bank of England, is conducting a review of regulation of the legal profession which reports in December. Which?, the consumers' association, reckons the profession's inability to deal with unhappy clients is 'the greatest threat to self-regulation'.”

AND NOT BEFORE TIME . . . Let’s hope we can rid ourselves of these dishonourable people.
http://www.perceptions.couk.com/laworjustice.html#well
“Are corrupt / pervert males appointed as judges, magistrates and police-chiefs?
" We think the evidence says so "
A great site with hundreds of actual examples and argument.
http://www.tribweb.co.uk/milligan28112003.htm
Lawyers have been a law unto themselves for too long. Duncan Milligan advocates a speedy reform of the legal profession. MPs described this as deceitful and dishonest and are calling on the Law Society to ask the lawyers to repay the money in full. Unfortunately, the Law Society will probably do what it always does: nothing.
http://www.human-rights.demon.co.uk/
Welcome to the Human-Rights web site. THE independent group of public spirited citizens whose aim is none other than to expose the established practices many fall victim to within the United Kingdom.
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/business/committees/historic/justice1/reports-02/j1r02-12-02.htm
This has led the Ombudsman to "question seriously" whether the Society balances correctly the interests of the profession and the interests of the public.12
They’ve got there same problem in Scotland. . . . . And they are always complaining they don’t get the same service we do in England?
And in Ireland . . . . . . .
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2091-1632764,00.html
O’Sullivan, who does not admit distributing the leaflets, said he initially set up the Irish website because he “couldn’t get anywhere with the legal system”. “The way people know each other in the legal profession seems to me to be the biggest problem,” he said.
http://www.derbygripe.co.uk/law.htm . . . . By Martin Mitchell
LAW SOCIETY GRAVY TRAIN HITS THE BUFFERS AT FULL SPEED
A great site well worth a visit . . .lots of other stuff too about Derby Council
http://www.olso.org.uk/
This Web Site is being established to warn people that if they make a complaint to the Law Society about a Solicitor's poor service and incompetency the chances of getting a proper or fair resolution to your complaint is probably about NIL. What you will find is that instead of trying to find any positives in your complaint they will do their very best to make every possible excuse under the sun so that the solicitor will be found not guilty of doing anything wrong.
How can I improve on that?
You cant get into this site probably for legal reasons?
Book THE MOST CORRUPT BRITISH JUDGES: Dr A Adoko Dr Adoko won a landmark case against the law society for racial discrimination but costs over £14,000 were awarded against him by judges. He was obliged to write this book which indicates the judiciary`s bias for British authorities against the ... http://www.corruptjudges.co.uk/
But you can get an explanation here.
http://www.elc.org.uk/papers/2000Adoko.doc
http://www.scottishlawyerwatch.org/
Of all the professions that have evolved in our society, none have ever come close to matching the legal profession for downright deceit and dishonesty. The legal profession is immutable, intransigent, self-protective, unaccountable, incompetent and corrupt.
THIS IS A FABULOUS SITE . SO PROFESSIONAL . WE NEED AN EQUIVALENT HERE . . IT NAMES AND SHAMES (you’d like to think so . . but some are so thick skinned) THEM ALL . . WONDERFUL STUFF.
http://www.sfo.gov.uk/news/prout/pr_131.asp?id=131
Five persons have been charged in connection with an alleged investment fraud perpetrated through three solicitors' firms. The defendants are:
Peter Edmund Barnett, solicitor (resident of Bishops Stortford) formerly of Rhodes Barlow, Hertfordshire.
Michael Wilson-Smith* (Haywards Heath) formerly of Wilson-Smith & Co., London
(* Wilson-Smith and Ruparelia are former solicitors)
Martin Tobias-Gibbins (Berkhamstead), a former client
Imdad Ullah (London ), a former client
http://www.ingramwintergreen.co.uk
What is not in doubt is the incompetence of Ingram Winter Green solicitors, and Daniel Ginsbury in particular in not being able to solve this problem.. . . . . me. . . . . the only solution they have come up with so far is bar their fax machine to my own, then hide behind the sofa and hope it will all go away. These are the people who sell the service of protecting others at exorbitant cost. Yet they can’t even protect themselves as these sites verify.
One of my own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that IWG will not reply to.
http://www.dennissmatthews.co.uk
I have now asked you THREE TIMES . . . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your client S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue, Shirley and with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Islington, to LIE to me in order to defraud me of my considerable claims against the freeholder of the above address? Are there any words you do not understand?
Another ofmy own sites . . where all the sensible letters are, that Denniss Matthews will not reply to.
http://www.legalbullies.co.uk/
In their "extreme defence" first of all their Council Catriona "Merciless when necessary". Duthie, St Johns Chambers, Bristol tried lying to the Judge regarding that damning "heading" on their original estimate (the heading that stated they had included costs which were NOT my responsibility and which they had refused to explain to the Law Society or the Judge). However, they didn't push this too far because the Judge said he was tempted to ask for a transcript. If he had done so I'm sure Catriona Duthie would have weaseled out of it by claiming that her memory was at fault. Yeah, Right! It's STILL a misleading lie as far as I'm concerned... it WAS untrue... and she IS on record... trying to mislead a Judge in a family case. Umm, a bit "extreme" when all I wanted was a detailed bill? There is MORE...
A Rant about a firm of Solicitors . . .FDC Law, (Faulkner, Daniel & Cruttwell Solicitors) Norton House, High Street, Midsomer Norton, BA3 2DF - and Patricia Wayman Senior Ptnr, in particular.
This firm also has offices in Frome and Paulton. . . LOADS to see . . lots of interesting links . . . and a whole section about Fathers . . could do with linking up to parents 4 protest.
http://www.standyourground.co.uk/
Certain business people, their accountants, solicitors and bank managers have been together in a 'ring' for some thirty years in driving people out of business and picking up their business premises, homes, farms, plots of land etc way beneath market value, financed by amongst other things black market and drugs money. Originally it was thought the area was around Aberystwyth, Mid Wales but it quickly became apparent that these scams are widespread throughout the country.
Started off as a local RANT but soon spread out.
http://www.roughjustice.org.uk/
The purpose of this website, is to give information based on my own experiences in using solicitors, ombudsmen, the Law Society, (the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors). This experience, gained from bitter and hard lessons in dealing with people who you might think were on the side of justice, especially the Law Society, hopefully will forewarn you, and make you more able to seek justice in a prepared manner. . . .
Can’t say fairer than that.
http://www.ex.ac.uk/~RDavies/arian/scandals/
While most of the cases in these pages involve real or suspected criminal activity a few are included simply because the scale of the incompetence or greed makes them scandalous.
Self explanatory.
http://members.aol.com/lawawful/ Theoretically it is an independent body but the Law Society has removed the previous director and taken direct control. Its inefficiency is so great that the present Lord Chancellor gave the OSS until the end of the year 2000 to put its house in order.
Less of a RANT . . but plenty of facts.
http://www.action4justice-fairhearing.org.uk/
On 8th July, 1997, Nolan recommended a statutory criminal offence of misuse of public office to apply to everyone, including "Ministers and Civil Servants; Councillors and Local Government Officers; the police, magistrates and the judiciary; and to non-governmental public bodies."
John Major had promised that he would implement anything Nolan recommended. Tony Blair came to power saying Labour would change what was wrong. But somehow this important change to the way we're governed has fallen by the wayside.
The mystery is not why it was "disappeared" but who-done-it?
caught Good solid political stuff . . This is what it’s really all about.
http://www.law-society.co.uk/
If the complaints system was run by an independent and impartial body many more solicitors would be found to be incompetent and have given poor service. The Law Society does not want to happen as it is not in their interest, and thus it controls the complaints procedures itself ,ensuring that the decisions lack what the man on the street would call logic and fairness.
This is still my favourite site . . And closest to my heart . . It takes on The Corrupt Law Society going straight for the jugular.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/scotland/3340901.stm
Even when they are caught they are let off.
http://www.ibtl.org.uk IBTL has been established for the sole purpose of offering help, advice and assistance to people who have been ill served by the law. We are a charitable organisation who are funded entirely through grants and donations. We have been established now for almost 10 years.
Contact & Help Site for victims of the rest of these pages.
http://www.ingramwintergreen.org/
why the malevolent disparagement herein? . . . . Ingram Winter green not only have the problem of what to do about these sites as far as the general public, who search on their name . . . but sometimes more importantly what to say to their’ peers about why they are not doing anything about it. . . I want my readers to be in absolutely no doubt just how much of a problem this is . . . . and hence my excruciating letters . . .I WANT TO DEMONSTRATE BY INFERENCE, THAT BEYOND ANY REASONABLE DOUBT INGRAM WINTER GREEN WILL NOT GO TO COURT to prevent me doing this because they know that they lied and dare not admit it in court. Ingram Winter Green deserve this excruciating disdain.
Yet another of my own sites . . this site is not for the sensitive who don’t know what a Wanker is.
http://www.bentjudgejamesgoss.co.uk/
DAVID BLUNKETT AND YVETTE COOPER KNOW ALL! They covered up and kept the lid on Pandora’s Box of undeniable premeditated judicial corruption!! Also included in this DOCUMENTED PROOF, he has deliberately lied!
Mans got a beef. . .
http://www.freeclaim.co.uk/nnews_story6.htm
Solicitors' commercial arrangements with claims management companies undermine their duty to the client, says John Barstow. SOLICITORS ARE seen as “arrogant, slow and crooked” according to an article in the Guardian on 26 August 2002 reporting the ICM Poll commissioned by the RAC.
http://www.unjustis.co.uk/News/News.htm#Special
The Law Society in England and Wales appears to have abandoned all pretence of maintaining any decent standards at all. For those of you with an interest in this matter, you might consider how another solicitor who was struck off for lying to clients and stealing their money has been recently restored to the Roll.

Fathers etc...
I hope the following links may be useful to someone.  This is certainly not exhaustive but please read the notes below.
http://www.mensaid.com - forums, news, advice and more.  Now a registered charity - formerly UK Fathers - Their very useful "Megaphones" are restored http://www.mensaid.com/megaphone/index.htm 
http://www.fathers-4-justice.org/ - one of their many, many sites - try a search.  I doubt these people need an introduction.
http://www.courtservice.gov.uk/View.do?id=2466 - I came across this judgment when searching the Court Services website.  It is clearly very sad and I feel that more judges should speak out. They should be critical of the law.  They should also be far more critical of mal-practicing legal "professionals" than they currently are.
It is impossible to research "injustice", "solicitor complaints" or "family law" without turning up some really serious, often heart-rending, cases and issues.  It is plain that there are inherent injustices in the substantive law and the way many judges view matters in family cases.  The complete lack of regulation of the so-called "professionals" who deal with these cases must be even more infuriating, exasperating and soul-destroying for many, many other people.
I am thankful that I have NOT had to become an "expert" in such injustices but I am certainly more aware and more concerned than I was.  This website itself may be of little use to such people.  Indeed, my own problems may seem trivial.  On the other hand, we have some common ground and who can really tell the true "cause and effect"?  What will strike a note with any given reader pursuing their own problems?  One example - shortly after I contacted my MP (Dan Norris) regarding my complaints with FDC Law and the OSS he made the news - 
One Other From the Post-Bag
http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200405/cmhansrd/cm050321/debtext/50321-34.htm
From someone who has suffered appallingly at the hands of a solicitor and the Law Society.
also http://www.geocities.com/profrogues/injustice ... another
Please do let me know if you have any more links that belong under this or any related heading.
[ Home ] [ FDC ] [ Misconduct ] [ Deception ] [ Lawyers ] [ OSS ] [ Police ] [ Links ] [ Feedback ]

Two more arrived in today's mail-bag (08/06/2008) under the title "Name & Shame websites":-
Two new websites to add to your links page
 www.scumrus.bravehost.com
 
www.wanksolicitors.bravehost.com
 http://www.echr-action.co.uk/
Does the failure to regulate the legal profession breach the European Convention of Human Rights?
[Applications looking for support]  [Make your own Application]  [Other Useful Actions]  [Links]
New! An Important Survey New! 
Have you ever complained to the Law Society about the conduct of a solicitor only to discover that, far from regulating the profession, the Law Society was biased in favour of the solicitor and did not investigate your complaint?  Have you complained to the Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman, expecting final justice, only to be confronted by more of the same, seemingly inept and biased behaviour?  If so, you are NOT alone.
The British Government has long been aware of the inadequacies of the so-called regulators of the Legal Profession and yet in REAL terms very little has changed.  All so-called improvements seem to offer a flavour of jam tomorrow whilst doing little or nothing for affected citizens today.  New legislated "powers" go unused and it remains business as usual for mal-practicing lawyers and their protection racket.  Access to Justice is thereby denied.  For many 1000's of people a year this may be a grave breach of their basic Human Rights.
If you have persistent genes (Q21) and the LSO gives you a "report" that dismisses your complaints then that is the end of your options, right?  Wrong!  There is no appeal from the Ombudsman's decision but you can have a Judicial Review.  Very few people, it seems, are this persistent.  Fewer still will be willing to take matters to the European Court of Human Rights.
The vast majority of complainants will fall into this last category.  Even if this is YOU, you should not give up so easily.  There is still a GREAT DEAL that you can, and perhaps should, DO.  Some of these positive actions may be far less difficult than you may think.  The purpose of this site is to raise awareness of some of these options.  Together we are much stronger.  Together we may achieve a great deal where individually all will be doomed to failure.  Please read on...
Did you know that the European Court operates a well established and important system for intervention by third parties in existing cases?  "Any person concerned" may adduce supporting information if it is considered to be "in the interest of the proper administration of justice".  This means that some people can have their say where it supports another application.  Read more (new window).  The process is simple and the only financial outlay is the cost of the postage. The only drawback...
How do you find out about such applications?
Here is our mission statement:-
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To attempt to "advertise" relevant applications filed with the ECHR
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To put any applicants in contact with one another to enable them to compare notes and assist each other with their applications, research and resources.
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To put would-be 3rd Party Interveners in contact with applicants in hope that they can help one another.
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To publish any information, guidelines, tips, hints, links and resources that may help others bring their own cases to the ECHR. (Please read the disclaimer).  Contributions welcome.
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To suggest other actions that YOU can take which may help ALL of us afflicted with this problem, now and in the future.
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/_themes/capsules/capbul1a.gif
To listen to YOUR suggestions to improve this site.
Interested?  Please study the pages linked below.
[Applications looking for support]  [Make your own Application]  [Other Useful Actions]  [Links]
Thank you for reading.  Please don't give up trying.  Make those persistent genes count.  Many decent individuals and organisations have been trying to change things for years.  Insist on your Article 10 rights and add your voice to those on the inside.  If you are able, add your voice on the outside too, through the European Court of Human Rights.
Notes:  References to the Law Society generally means the regulatory arm of the Law Society.  This organisation has the dual and conflicting role of both "regulator" and "trade union" to solicitors and their firms.  The Solicitors Complaints Bureau (SCB) was replaced by the Office for the Supervision of Solicitors (OSS).  In April 2004 the OSS re-branded itself as the Consumer Complaints Service (CCS).  Many folks might say that nothing has changed for the better in all this time.  Research carried out in 1998 gave us the Willing Blindness Report - the name says it all.  In 2004 we had the Clementi Review.  Once again we are promised "jam tomorrow" in the form of White Papers.  For more information on these subjects please check out the links page.  So far we have seen "too little, too late" - and we ask the question "How much is likely to change when those resisting change are at the heart of our society - the legal profession as a whole?"  Please act.
Disclaimer: Please note that nobody currently associated with this website has any legal qualifications.  We cannot offer legal advice.  Any information given here is provided in good faith only.  You are advised to check the facts thoroughly for yourself.  If you need legal advice then you may wish to consider consulting a suitably qualified professional.  We cannot (currently) recommend anyone or even tell you who to avoid.  If anything published here is incorrect then please let us know.
To contact us by email please type the address exactly as it appears below...
http://www.echr-action.co.uk/images/email1.GIF
http://www.mcadvo.co.uk/GB/en/advoofficelist/372_f14da_conveyancing-residential_11.html
Ingram Winter Green
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
London
WC1N 2BL
England
·     » Michael Adrian Compton
·     » Sanjay Chandarana
·     » Elizabeth Jane Bartle
·     » Nathan Anthony Edwards
·     » Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
 
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury, Solicitor,
Solicitor London
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
Bedford House
London
WC1N 2BL
England
Address
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green
21A John Street
Bedford House
London
WC1N 2BL
England
Contact data
Phone :             +44 (0) 20 7845 7400      
Contact data
[Display contact details]
Qualification
·     Solicitor
Fields of Law
·     Commercial property
·     Conveyancing residential
·     Landlord and tenant - residential
Languages
·     English
·     Spanish
·     Italian
·     Hebrew
·     Punjabi
·     Urdu


http://www.mcadvo.co.uk/GB/en/law-firm/370_7003839ec_Ingram_Winter_Green_WC1N_2BL_London.html
Legal Practitioners
Michael Adrian Compton
Commercial property, Conveyancing residential, Landlord and tenant - residential
 
Sanjay Chandarana
Commercial litigation, Landlord and tenant - residential, Civil litigation
 
Elizabeth Jane Bartle
Employment law, Commercial litigation, Professional negligence, Civil liberties and human rights
 
Nathan Anthony Edwards
Commercial property, Conveyancing residential, Landlord and tenant - residential
 
Daniel Jacob Ginsbury
Commercial property, Conveyancing residential, Landlord and tenant - residential
 
Malcolm Alan Gordon
Commercial litigation, Insolvency and bankruptcy, Civil litigation, Professional negligence
 
David Peter Daws
Business affairs, Corporate finance, Mergers and acquisitions, Tax law, Employment law, Aviation law
 
Pauline Helen Glen
Commercial property
  http://www.mcadvo.co.uk/GB/en/solicitor_london/359_7020913df_Daniel_Jacob_Ginsbury_WC1N_2BL_London.html
 


Web Hosting Companies